YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #trump #astronomy #florida #humor #inflation #nightsky #biology #moon #plantbiology #terrorism #trafficsafety #animalbiology #gardening #assaultcar #carviolence
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
1 y

CNN’s Coates: Supreme Court Justices Lack Legitimacy
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

CNN’s Coates: Supreme Court Justices Lack Legitimacy

On Thursday, CNN’s Laura Coates mocked Supreme Court justices by declaring, “at the end of the day, if I hold my breath long enough and bite my tongue long enough, you'll call me justice.” Meanwhile, former Obama White House senior director Nayyera Haq and GOP Rep. Joe Walsh made it evident that they believe the Supreme Court could use some upgrades. Coates began by playing a clip of First Lady Jill Biden on The View. In the clip, Biden started out by warning, “Think of the Supreme Court. For God's sake, talk about things getting worse! Can you imagine if we put any more Republicans on the Supreme Court?” As the clip continued, Jill Biden confidently stated that, “We will lose all of our rights! We’re talking about women’s rights, gay rights” if Donald Trump gets reelected.     Afterward, Coates asked, “Should they be leaning into this messaging more about the Supreme Court composition?” Walsh agreed with what Biden had to say. After stating that he is a “political conservative,” he noted that “It's perfectly okay to use the Supreme Court to your political advantage.” Although Walsh supported her statements, he continued, “I just worry. I don't want anyone to question the legitimacy of the Court,” but as this interview would prove, people were already questioning the legitimacy of the justices. Walsh seemed to be unsure of whether or not he should be in favor of what Biden stated. He refers to what she said as “perfectly okay” but then acknowledges that he worries about the perspective people will have in regards to the Supreme Court. Right after he shared his concern, he stated, “But yeah, call them out politically all day long.” While Walsh tried to portray himself as the reasonable conservative Haq was quick to illustrate that, for the left, the Court’s legitimacy is directly tied to its rulings, “the Court is questioning its own legitimacy and providing fodder for these conversations by acting and behaving in unethical ways.” While Haq claims that the Court is questioning its own legitimacy, it is evident that the media, rather than the justices themselves, is questioning the court's legitimacy. Haq called the lifetime appointment of justices “unique in the modern landscape.” She also tried to argue we should reconsider this because of “how long people are living these days” as if her problem with conservative justices is their age and not their rulings. Click "Expand" to view the transcripts: CNN Laura Coates Live 5/29/24 11:46:58-11:49:12 (…) LAURA COATES: And, of course, we talk about the Supreme Court more broadly. Before Roe v. Wade was overturned, this was a very big election issue. There were many Republicans who said they're going to compartmentalize their feelings about Donald Trump and their visceral reactions to him personally because of the promise of being able to overturn Roe v. Wade. And really, it remains a campaign issue, the composition of the court and who might decide who's on it. Just ask the former leader of the Senate, Mitch McConnell. But the first lady, Jill Biden, was talking about how the election could actually impact the court. Listen to this. [ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: JILL BIDEN: “WE WILL LOSE” RIGHTS IF TRUMP APPOINTS ANOTHER JUSTICE] (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) DR. JILL BIDEN: Think of the Supreme Court. For God's sake, talk about things getting worse! Can you imagine if we put any more Republicans on the Supreme Court? SUNNY HOSTIN. No, no. BIDEN: No! JOY BEHAR: We’re finished. BIDEN: We will lose all of our rights! So, we're talking about women's rights, gay rights. (END VIDEO CLIP) COATES: Should they be leaning into this messaging more about the Supreme Court composition? JOE WALSH (FORMER U.S. REPRESENTATIVE): Yes, and I say this as a political conservative. It's perfectly okay to use the Supreme Court to your political advantage. I just worry. I don't want anyone to question the legitimacy of the court. But yeah, call them out politically all day long. NAYYERA HAQ (FORMER WHITEHOUSE SENIOR DIRECTOR): That's part of the challenge, right? That the court is questioning its own legitimacy and providing fodder for these conversations by acting and behaving in unethical ways, by making decisions that go contrary to what they said they would do in their confirmation hearings. That's part of the challenge of there being no check on the Supreme Court. And listen, we didn't start with the Constitution that had nine Supreme Court justices. The court has been expanded. And it will be interesting to see if there is another Biden term, how they address this challenge of the imbalance in the court. WALSH: We've got one side, Laura, that has been talking about rigged elections. I don't want the Democrats to be the party that talks about rigged rulings, but go after them politically. HAQ: The challenge we have with the Supreme Court is they're not elected at the end of the day. WALSH: Yeah. HAQ: And that lifetime appointment is something very unique in the modern landscape, considering how long people are living these days. COATES: And they are very savvy about how to answer the questions to get at the end of the day, if I hold my breath long enough and bite my tongue long enough, you'll call me justice.  
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
1 y

Jury finds Trump guilty on all counts in New York criminal trial
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

Jury finds Trump guilty on all counts in New York criminal trial

Former President Donald Trump was found guilty on all counts by a panel of 12 jurors on Thursday in the New York criminal trial, according to live updates from the courthouse. After roughly 11 and a half hours over two days, the jury reached its verdict. "Please let there be no reactions, no outbursts of any kind," acting Justice Juan Merchan said before the jury read its verdict.Trump was facing 34 felony counts of falsifying business records, filed by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg (D) last year. The prosecution accused Trump of marking payments made to his then-personal attorney, Michael Cohen, as legal expenses in an attempt to cover up a $130,000 settlement payment the attorney made to porn actress Stormy Daniels to keep quiet about an alleged affair with the former president.'We think that appears to be a highly unlikely outcome here.'Trump pleaded not guilty to all counts and denied Daniels' allegations. The defense argued that the monthly $35,000 payments made to Cohen in 2017, totaling $420,000, were for legal services. However, Cohen claimed a portion of the funds were reimbursement for his payment to Daniels. Trump could not leave the courthouse while the jury was deliberating.“Very unfair that I am not being allowed to Campaign. Crooked Joe Biden Witch Hunt. Third World Country!!!” Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social.On Tuesday morning, Merchan delivered jury instructions, during which he told the panel that they did not need to agree on the "unlawful means" to render a unanimous guilty verdict against Trump."You need not be unanimous as to what those unlawful means were … you may consider: violations of FECA [Federal Election Campaign Act], falsification of other business records, violation of tax laws," he added.Legal expert Jonathan Turley explained in a post on X, "Merchan just delivered the coup de grace instruction. He said that there is no need to agree on what occurred. They can disagree on what the crime was among the three choices. Thus, this means that they could split 4-4-4 and he will still treat them as unanimous."Journalist Paul Ingrassia remarked that Merchan's jury instructions "may be the broadest definition of a crime in history." He accused the judge of "literally throwing the whole book at the jury."On Wednesday, after roughly four and a half hours of deliberations, the jury requested to hear a readback of several parts of witness testimony, including former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker's statements regarding his phone conversation with Trump in June 2016 and a meeting in August 2015 at Trump Tower. Jurors asked to hear Pecker's testimony concerning a payment from AMI, the media outlet's parent company, to former Playboy model Karen McDougal, who claimed she had an affair with Trump.Cohen's testimony regarding the meeting at Trump Tower was also requested by the jury.Additionally, the panel asked to hear Merchan's jury instructions again. New York state courts prohibit jurors from receiving a written copy of the instructions.On Thursday morning, ahead of the readbacks requested from the previous day, the jury submitted another note specifying which part of Merchan's instructions they would like to hear again. The panel also requested headphones or speakers for the evidence laptop. Trump spoke out about Merchan’s jury instructions in a post on Truth Social on Thursday, stating, “The Jury Instructions given by HIGHLY CONFLICTED Judge, Juan Merchan, were UNFAIR, MISLEADING, INACCURATE, AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL. They were also VERY CONFUSING (Just what the Judge wanted!), BECAUSE THERE WAS NO CRIME!”Earlier Thursday afternoon, the jury left the courtroom to continue deliberations. During the lunch break, the panel did not request any additional notes.Will Scharf, an attorney for Trump, told CNN's Jake Tapper that they are prepared to appeal if Trump is convicted. "If there were to be a conviction here, which we believe would be a gravely unjust verdict, we would speedily appeal to the New York Appellate division, potentially to the New York Court of Appeals as well. And we'll take that step if we get there," Scharf stated. "But so far, we think that appears to be a highly unlikely outcome here."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Like
Comment
Share
National Review
National Review
1 y

NRPLUS Conference Call with Rabbi Meir Soloveichik and Rich Lowry
Favicon 
www.nationalreview.com

NRPLUS Conference Call with Rabbi Meir Soloveichik and Rich Lowry

Rabbi Soloveichik and Rich Lowry discussed the alarming surge of anti-semitism in America, pro-Hamas protests on college campuses, and the ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestine. The call also offers insightful viewpoints on how these matters could impact the Jewish vote in the 2024 presidential election.
Like
Comment
Share
National Review
National Review
1 y

Trump Found Guilty on All Counts in Hush-Money Trial
Favicon 
www.nationalreview.com

Trump Found Guilty on All Counts in Hush-Money Trial

Trump became the first former president to be convicted of a crime after a controversial prosecution by DA Alvin Bragg.
Like
Comment
Share
National Review
National Review
1 y

Yes, It Was Rigged
Favicon 
www.nationalreview.com

Yes, It Was Rigged

The Alvin Bragg trial was everything that Trump warns about.
Like
Comment
Share
Twitchy Feed
Twitchy Feed
1 y

After Lying Repeatedly, DOJ Releases Emails PROVING They Tracked Moms for Liberty As a Hate Group
Favicon 
twitchy.com

After Lying Repeatedly, DOJ Releases Emails PROVING They Tracked Moms for Liberty As a Hate Group

After Lying Repeatedly, DOJ Releases Emails PROVING They Tracked Moms for Liberty As a Hate Group
Like
Comment
Share
Twitchy Feed
Twitchy Feed
1 y

YIKES: Guy With Suspended License Makes Zoom Court Appearance While DRIVING
Favicon 
twitchy.com

YIKES: Guy With Suspended License Makes Zoom Court Appearance While DRIVING

YIKES: Guy With Suspended License Makes Zoom Court Appearance While DRIVING
Like
Comment
Share
Twitchy Feed
Twitchy Feed
1 y

BREAKING -- Welcome to the Banana Republic: Trump Found Guilty; UPDATE: Trump Responds, Sentencing Set
Favicon 
twitchy.com

BREAKING -- Welcome to the Banana Republic: Trump Found Guilty; UPDATE: Trump Responds, Sentencing Set

BREAKING -- Welcome to the Banana Republic: Trump Found Guilty; UPDATE: Trump Responds, Sentencing Set
Like
Comment
Share
Twitchy Feed
Twitchy Feed
1 y

Reactions Come in to Donald Trump's Guilty Verdict; Ron DeSantis, Marco Rubio, and More
Favicon 
twitchy.com

Reactions Come in to Donald Trump's Guilty Verdict; Ron DeSantis, Marco Rubio, and More

Reactions Come in to Donald Trump's Guilty Verdict; Ron DeSantis, Marco Rubio, and More
Like
Comment
Share
Twitchy Feed
Twitchy Feed
1 y

Rep. Jamie Raskin Writes That SCOTUS Recusals Are Not a ‘Friendly Suggestion’
Favicon 
twitchy.com

Rep. Jamie Raskin Writes That SCOTUS Recusals Are Not a ‘Friendly Suggestion’

Rep. Jamie Raskin Writes That SCOTUS Recusals Are Not a ‘Friendly Suggestion’
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 69775 out of 98537
  • 69771
  • 69772
  • 69773
  • 69774
  • 69775
  • 69776
  • 69777
  • 69778
  • 69779
  • 69780
  • 69781
  • 69782
  • 69783
  • 69784
  • 69785
  • 69786
  • 69787
  • 69788
  • 69789
  • 69790
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund