The Supreme Court ruled Monday in Trump v. United States that a former president has substantial immunity from prosecution for official acts committed in office. However, not for unofficial acts. The Court sent the matter back to a lower court. The justices did not apply the ruling to whether or not former President Trump is […] The post President’s Have Absolute Immunity on Core Constitutional Powers appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

The Supreme Court issued a ruling on Monday that Donald Trump‘s claim of presidential immunity to shield himself from federal prosecution is valid for official acts, but not for unofficial conduct, in a partial victory for the former president. Justices voted 6-3 along ideological lines in the decision and sent the case in which Trump pleaded not guilty to charges accusing him of unlawfully plotting to overturn the results of the 2020 election back to a lower D.C. court for further review. “The President is not above the law,” the ruling said. “But under our system of separated powers, the President may not be prosecuted for exercising his core constitutional powers, and he is entitled to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for his official acts.” Because the ruling was released so late — on the final day of the term — the Associated Press noted the justices “reduced” or “eliminated” the chances of a trial being held before the November election. And the case may already be weakened by a prior ruling that found the Justice Department went too far with January 6-related obstruction charges. “BIG WIN FOR OUR CONSTITUTION AND DEMOCRACY. PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN!” Trump exclaimed in a post to Truth Social after the ruling. Trump’s lawyers filed to dismiss the case in October of last year by asserting that the former president’s actions were “within the heartland” of his “official duties.” Federal prosecutors, led by special counsel Jack Smith, argued that the defense’s immunity argument threatened to give presidents a “license” to commit crimes while in office. U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, spurned Trump’s immunity claim, saying the defendant’s “four-year service as Commander in Chief did not bestow on him the divine right of kings to evade the criminal accountability that governs his fellow citizens.” The case now returns to her for determining what constitutes official acts. A federal appeals court panel also rejected the immunity argument in an early February ruling. By the end of the month, the Supreme Court agreed to take up the question. Chutkan had set the trial to start on March 4 — one day before Super Tuesday — but that plan fell by the wayside. The high court heard arguments in April. Last year, in December, the Supreme Court denied a bid by federal prosecutors to fast-track consideration of the immunity claim, arguing that a quick resolution to allow a trial to proceed was of “imperative public importance.” Trump’s defense lawyers said the question should be considered in a “cautious, deliberative manner.” CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP Trump has faced three other criminal matters during his 2024 campaign, including another case led by Smith over the former president’s handling of classified documents, as well as civil litigation. Attorneys for Trump cited presidential immunity in a request to dismiss the documents case in which the judge has indefinitely postponed the trial. In a New York hush-money case, a jury convicted Trump on all counts. Sentencing is scheduled for July 11, just days before the GOP convention. Trump vowed to appeal. A case in Georgia that also relates to the 2020 election has been paused, likely until after the 2024 contest, as Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis fights to stay involved.

A group of educators is sounding the alarm after its union tasked an activist who holds openly anti-Israel views with developing a new curriculum on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The Director of Training & Professional Learning for the Massachusetts Teachers Association, Ricardo Rosa, has a record of disseminating anti-American and anti-Israel rhetoric. He referred to the United States as a “settler colony,” glorified Leila Khaled, a terrorist who hijacked a plane, supported a professor who labeled Zionists “swine,” encouraged protests in Jewish neighborhoods, and advocated for a “Free Palestine” in the immediate days after the October 7 massacre by Hamas on civilians in southern Israel. The MTA, representing 117,000 teachers and faculty members at public schools and universities, has come under fire for its response to the October 7 massacre. In December, its board of directors voted in favor of a statement condemning the United States as complicit in the “genocidal assault” in Gaza. The vote also approved the Training and Professional Learning Division, run by Rosa, to develop “a framework for discussing and set of curriculum resources for learning about the history and current events in Israel and Occupied Palestine, for MTA members to use with each other and their students.” Several union members from across Massachusetts tell The Daily Wire that Rosa’s views would infect any curriculum on Israel and demanded that the MTA halt its development.  Jany Finkielsztein, a former instructional coach for the Waltham public schools who retired last year, said Rosa’s social media posts about the United States and Israel reveal his “commitment to transforming classrooms into arenas of radicalism.” “He posted ‘Free Palestine’ on October 9, before Israel even responded to the Hamas’ massacre of Israeli civilians,” Finkielsztein told The Daily Wire. “I think it’s concerning that the MTA is employing someone who is so committed to a political agenda against the world’s only Jewish state.” Some Hamas terrorists were still in southern Israel at the time of his Instagram post. Ricardo Rosa’s post called for “Free Palestine” two days after Hamas’s massacre of Israeli civilians in southern Israel. In the following months, Rosa made posts declaring “Western humanity is a lie,” accused Israel of committing genocide, and again posted “Free Palestine” with an image of a Houthi-run rally calling for supporting Gaza and increasing attacks. He also praised Aaron Bushnell, the U.S. airman who set himself on fire in February outside the Israeli embassy in Washington, D.C. In April, Rosa called for the reinstatement of Danny Shaw, a former John Jay College professor, who he described as a “good brother.” Shaw was dismissed after calling Zionists “Babylon swine,” encouraging protests in “their neighborhoods,” and pushing other anti-Semitic tropes, according to Canary Mission. Rosa also voiced support for the anti-Israel student encampments around the country. Ricardo Rosa’s posts about Aaron Bushnell, a Houthi-run rally, and terrorist and plane hijacker, Leila Khaled. (Photo: Instagram) Other union members argue Rosa’s posts showing his participation at several anti-Israel rallies across Massachusetts should disqualify him from making curriculum, including a now-deleted post where he called to “cut off the oxygen of this empire.” “May the screams of the women, men and children of Gaza haunt all those who have chosen the side of evil, of settler colonialism, of imperialist, patriarchal, racist violence. May the suffering of Palestinians living under Apartheid be erased,” Rosa wrote in another post. Ricardo Rosa’s posts of pro-Palestine protests. (Photo: Facebook) “I was shocked when I saw his activism posts just days after he was tasked with the development of the new curriculum,” Max Reich, a math teacher at Shawsheen Valley Technical High School said. “Asking activists to develop curriculum will not lead to accurate or useful material for students.” According to several MTA members, the MTA has not made a curriculum or resources for other world conflicts. The MTA did not respond to a request for comment about the curriculum. Massachusetts Teachers Association’s promotional material for its “The Struggle Against Anti-Palestinian Racism” webinar. In March, the MTA faced backlash when Rosa’s department hosted a “The Struggle Against Anti-Palestinian Racism” webinar which featured a presenter who praised Hamas terrorists for their “courage” in attacking Israel “whatever the cost” just two weeks after the attack. The webinar made it a focus to convince attendees that anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism have no correlation.  “You know exactly what you’re going to get before it’s even created,” Reich said, citing the webinar as proof Rosa’s office cannot be trusted with crafting educational materials on Israel. “They demonstrated their bias already.” Ricardo Rosa posted a series of graphics in a now-deleted post. One of which referred to the U.S. as “Turtle Island.”(Photo: Facebook) In an email defending the webinar obtained by The Daily Wire, Rosa compared the United States to Israel, calling the former “a settler colony.”  “The critique of settler colonialism is leveled not only at Israel,” Rosa wrote. “I think that everyone agrees that we also live in a settler colony.” Rosa’s posts also expressed anti-American sentiments, including one graphic referring to the United States as “Turtle Island,” a term used by so-called “anti-colonialists” to suggest that the United States exists on stolen land. In a comment on a post, he accused U.S. taxpayers of being complicit in funding “the genocide.” Ricardo Rosa’s comment on his Facebook post where he accuses the U.S. taxpayers of being complicit in funding “the genocide.” (Source: Facebook) After the webinar, Rosa shared a statement from Jewish Voice for Peace, a radical leftist group that helped craft the webinar and is known for blaming Israel for Hamas’ attack. In the email, Rosa defended the webinar by asserting it was to “critique” Israel and not Jewish people, adding that if MTA members want to submit proposals for other workshops and webinars “they may do so.” While Rosa mentioned in the email that the group is deliberating hosting a workshop on anti-Semitism, Finkielsztein said her proposal for a session on the topic during a December conference titled, ‘Cultivating Cultural Pride: Nurturing Cultural Identity and Heritage,’ was rejected after October 7. An email from Ricardo Rosa where he calls the U.S. a “settler colony.” “I believe my workshop proposal, titled ‘Jewish Ethnic and Cultural Diversity at a Time of Rising Anti-Semitism’ was likely declined due to a potential conflict with the narrative promoted by certain members of the MTA, including Rosa, who advocate for portraying Israel as a settler colonial enterprise and Jews as white oppressors,” Finkielsztein, who has created many teacher training programs during her 17-year career, said. “After the tragic events in Israel the following day, accepting it seemed like the obvious choice.”  The Anti-Oppression Strategist and Educator working in Rosa’s office notified Finkielsztein on November 3 that her proposal was rejected without a cited reason, according to an email obtained by The Daily Wire. When Finkielsztein probed for a reason, an MTA employee responded 20 days later, stating they had no feedback to provide. “As educators, we consistently provide and anticipate specific feedback, yet I was not provided with the information necessary to understand why the workshop proposal was not accepted,” Finkielsztein said. “At the same MTA conference, Bettina Love was the keynote speaker.” Bettina Love is the co-founder of Abolitionist Teaching Network (ATN) which promotes critical race theory and claimed “Palestine is always under attack” and said “we don’t need to All Lives Matter this moment,” about a week after the October 7 attack. “When it comes to #Palestine, we know which side of history we are on. Genocide is unfolding before our eyes, so taking action is not a question,” ATN’s X account posted the same day with instructions to help end the “Gaza Genocide.” Finkielsztein said that she and other Jewish members have repeatedly had their concerns about Rosa ignored by the MTA. “MTA should be focused on protecting its educators, not promoting divisive political rhetoric and an anti-Israel agenda that is represented by keeping Rosa in his position of leadership,” she added. “As educators, it’s crucial to maintain a separation between our political beliefs and the classroom environment to uphold the quality of education for our students.” Several MTA members said Rosa lacks the qualifications and expertise in foreign politics to craft any curriculum on the topic. “He has no academic experience in Middle Eastern history or politics,” Finkielsztein said. “He only has a personal political ideology.” Reich said the MTA has been increasingly aggressive in pushing anti-Israel views that are not held by the majority of its members. He recalled attending the Annual Meeting of Delegates in April where he wanted to discuss vocational education, but instead was greeted by a group of union members passing out anti-Israel materials and pushing to propose non-business items about Israel. Another source said MTA members wore wearing keffiyehs to make a political statement at the conference. Many of the anti-Israel MTA members are part of the MTA Rank & File for Palestine group, which regularly posts anti-Israel propaganda and advertisements for protests on its Instagram page. “As a Jewish person, I was alarmed and was shocked by how aggressive it was and how organized they were as a group,” Reich said, adding that the group was passing out fliers with anti-Israel talking points. Reich said he has considered leaving the MTA, but remains because he likes his local union which requires him to stay a member of the MTA.  MTA and Rosa did not respond to a request for comment.

The following essay originally appeared on Andrew Klavan’s Substack, ‘The New Jerusalem.’ Oklahoma’s top education official has ordered the state’s public schools to teach the Bible. State School Superintendent Ryan Walters says, “The Bible is an indispensable historical and cultural touchstone. Without basic knowledge of it, Oklahoma students are unable to properly contextualize the foundation of our nation.” The mandate set off a wave of near-hysteria among establishment elites. The New York Times called it an “extraordinary move that blurs the lines between religious instruction and public education.” But no. Superintendent Walters is fully in the right. Indeed, his statement doesn’t go far enough. The fact is, you cannot understand the West without thinking about God and the Bible. You cannot understand Western man or Western history, Western literature, art, or philosophy, without considering them in the context of faith. This is true whether you believe in God or not. Human beings act on certain basic drives and instincts. If you don’t acknowledge and account for those drives and instincts, you can’t understand what humans are trying to do and why. If you don’t know human motives and desires, you can’t make sense of human actions or see into people’s inner lives. History, culture, politics, even personal relationships become little more to you than a meaningless jumble of facts and events. Wikimedia. This is basic common sense. People want to live and thrive. You can’t begin to understand them without examining the pressures of survival that form their priorities. People are driven to mate and reproduce. You can’t understand women without considering their maternal instincts. You can’t understand men without parsing the nature of their sexual longings. It makes no difference that your Aunt Matilda hates children or your Uncle Ned never looked at a woman. Even those experiences must be understood in the context of the norm. This is not an imposition of societal values. This is the way things work. After the desire to live, which is common to all creatures, perhaps the most basic human desire — the most human human desire — is the desire for happiness. “Every art and every inquiry, and similarly every action and choice, is thought to aim at some good; and for this reason the good has rightly been declared to be that at which all things aim,” writes Aristotle in the “Nicomachean Ethics.” The good, he goes on to say, “is generally agreed to be happiness,” because happiness is an end in itself. And he adds: “Happiness is an activity of soul in accordance with perfect virtue.” Through all of Western history, and most certainly in that portion of Western history dominated and shaped by Christianity, the form of virtue has been understood in relation to the will of God. This means that the central human drive for happiness is inseparably linked to faith. “All men seek happiness. This is without exception,” wrote the great 17th century scientist-philosopher Blaise Pascal. “While the present never satisfies us, experience dupes us, and from misfortune to misfortune leads us to death, their eternal crown… These are all inadequate, because the infinite abyss can only be filled by an infinite and immutable object, that is to say, only by God Himself.” For C. S. Lewis, the very presence of this God-shaped desire within us was cause for faith: “Creatures are not born with desires unless satisfaction for those desires exists. A baby feels hunger: well, there is such a thing as food. A duckling wants to swim: well, there is such a thing as water. Men feel sexual desire: well, there is such a thing as sex. If I find in myself a desire which no experience in this world can satisfy, the most probable explanation is that I was made for another world.” Now, of course, Lewis could’ve been wrong about this. It may be that our desire for God cannot be satisfied. But that doesn’t make the desire go away any more than our sexual desires go away when they can’t be satisfied. As with sex, repression or abandonment of our God desire causes it to morph into other forms. Those atheist philosophers honest enough to face the ramifications of their unbelief have acknowledged that, without God, both virtue and happiness must logically become manifestations of our will to power and pleasure. The Marquis de Sade declared, “There is no God, nature sufficeth unto herself.” Therefore “if misery persecutes virtue and prosperity accompanies crime, those things being as one in Nature’s view,” isn’t it “far better to join company with the wicked who flourish, than to be counted amongst the virtuous who founder?” Sade, the namesake of sadism, saw that the greatest pleasure of the strong is to satisfy their desires on the weak. One story has it that Sade helped spark the French Revolution by crying for help from within the Bastille. Though apocryphal, the story does illustrate this sadean insight: Seeking the basis of virtue within ourselves will quickly transform our quest for freedom into a riot of sadistic violence. Nietzsche agreed that, without God, objective morality vanishes. We are left to deconstruct the genealogy of our contingent morals so that the strong among us can impose a morality of their own “beyond good and evil.” After his death, this philosophy was used — unfairly, some say; inevitably, I think — to support the depredations of Hitler and the Nazis. Nietzsche’s most influential disciple, Michel Foucault, likewise believed that what we call morality is merely power in masquerade. To move beyond power’s oppressive conventions, he sought to dismantle them within himself and so destroyed himself (and likely others) in an orgy of sexual masochism. We long for happiness. Happiness derives from virtue. Without God, virtue is a manifestation of power and desire. If we seek happiness in power and desire, we become agents of destruction. As God himself warned: “All those that hate me, love death.” This is not to say that atheists can’t be good people, only that they can’t make sense of their own virtue. They cannot explain why the strong should suppress their desires for virtue’s sake. Thus even atheists, one way or another, will ultimately be forced to confront their unbelief in the context of God. READ: Find more in-depth articles from Andrew Klavan at ‘The New Jerusalem.’ Nevertheless, we seem to have entered a time in which the clerisy is desperate to ignore God’s presence even as a psychic construct. The panic over Oklahoma’s Bible mandate is only one example of the ubiquitous attempts to erase any mention of the source and motivation of our culture and history. Brilliantly rational believers like C. S. Lewis and Rene Girard are relegated to second rate status beneath thinkers like Nietzsche and Foucault, whose philosophies led to disastrous outcomes. The atheist arguments of writers like Richard Dawkins, Stephen Pinker and Yuval Harari are praised and elevated, though it is clear these men, while obviously intelligent, have absolutely no understanding of what religious thinkers actually think. In 2007, the European Union marked the 50th anniversary of its founding without once mentioning the religion that shaped the continent formerly called Christendom. The brilliant Wall Street Journal book reviewer Barton Swaim recently remarked, “I don’t know how many lives I’ve read in which otherwise fair and capable biographers dismiss or minimize their subject’s expressions of faith for no obvious reason.” This is true onscreen as well where biopics about such fervent Christians as Louis Zamperini and Johnny Cash reduce their subject’s faith to a footnote. The resistance against — the hostility toward — considering life and culture in light of our God-shaped yearnings may have begun as a rebellion against superstition and church oppression, but it seems to have metastasized into something like the rebellion of Satan in John Milton’s Paradise Lost: an attempt to free ourselves from moral reality altogether, so we can define our own natures, genders, rights and wrongs and make “a heaven of hell, a hell of heaven.” But because neither reality nor our desires will reshape themselves at our command, the predictable result of our willful ignorance about God is that we have become stupid about ourselves and our human situation. The 2022 Pulitzer Prize winning novel “Trust” by Hernan Diaz contains a remark being much quoted on the internet as a kernel of wisdom: “God is the most uninteresting answer to the most interesting questions.” Taken as an axiom, this strikes me as the opposite of the truth. Certainly, without God, we can answer the questions available to science, namely how do things happen. But the most interesting question is always: why? And if the universe came into existence without an act of sovereign will, there can be no why. Everything just is. Only when we consider the universe, our world and our lives as conscious acts of creation, can we begin to wrestle with the reasons they exist at all. This, this alone, is the path to finding meaning, virtue and happiness. If we think we can create a different path on our own, we do not know ourselves. We cannot know ourselves. * * * Andrew Klavan is the host of “The Andrew Klavan Show” at The Daily Wire. He is the bestselling author of the Cameron Winter Mystery series. The third installment, “The House of Love and Death,” is now available. Follow him on X: @andrewklavan This essay originally appeared on Andrew Klavan’s Substack, ‘The New Jerusalem.‘

The Supreme Court is poised to issue a landmark decision on whether former President Donald Trump can claim presidential immunity from prosecution for actions taken during his tenure. The case, pivotal for both Trump’s legal battles and future presidential powers, centers on allegations of conspiracy and obstruction related to the 2020 election. Trump’s attorneys argue that his actions, including pressuring state officials and coordinating with the Republican National Committee to challenge electoral results, fall within his official duties and should be protected by presidential immunity. They cite the 1982 Supreme Court case, Fitzgerald v. Nixon, which granted former President Richard Nixon immunity from civil damages for official acts, as a key precedent supporting their position​. Pictured here are three men who are praying the Supreme Court grants Trump Presidential immunity today…. pic.twitter.com/xHkjUHtBc0 — Chicago1Ray (@Chicago1Ray) July 1, 2024 However, lower courts, including a three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, have unanimously rejected this claim, ruling that Trump’s actions after the election were not official acts but rather personal and political maneuvers. This decision allowed Special Counsel Jack Smith to proceed with a trial, prompting Trump to seek a stay from the Supreme Court​. The case, known as Trump v. United States, has attracted significant public and legal scrutiny. The Supreme Court’s decision could redefine the scope of presidential immunity, impacting not only Trump but also future presidents. Legal experts suggest that the court might adopt a middle-ground approach, distinguishing between actions taken within the "outer perimeter" of presidential duties and those clearly political or personal in nature. Good Monday. We could see a significant Supreme Court ruling on “Presidential Immunity” this morning. If SCOTUS denies immunity, then Obama can face charges for spying on Trump’s 2016 campaign. It works both ways! pic.twitter.com/6DsFht4fUD — Charles R Downs (@TheCharlesDowns) July 1, 2024 Several key issues are under consideration. Firstly, whether Trump's efforts to organize alternate slates of electors and communicate with Congress members to object to electoral votes can be deemed official acts. The court is also examining whether his pressure on Vice President Mike Pence to delay the electoral count constitutes an abuse of power beyond constitutional boundaries​​. Trump’s defense emphasizes that his conduct was part of his constitutional responsibilities, arguing that any prosecutorial action against a former president for official acts is unprecedented and would set a dangerous precedent. Conversely, the prosecution insists that Trump's actions were overtly political and aimed at subverting the electoral process, thereby falling outside the scope of legitimate presidential duties​​. The Supreme Court’s impending ruling, expected within weeks, will not only determine Trump’s legal fate but also clarify the extent of legal protections afforded to a sitting or former president. The decision could influence ongoing and future investigations, shaping the legal landscape for executive accountability in the United States​​. The outcome holds significant political ramifications as well, particularly with Trump being a prominent candidate for the 2024 presidential election. A ruling in his favor could bolster his campaign, while a decision against him might complicate his path to re-election. Regardless of the verdict, the case underscores the ongoing debate about the balance of power and accountability at the highest levels of government. The post Supreme Court to Rule on Trump’s Presidential Immunity: High Stakes for Legal and Political Landscape appeared first on The Conservative Brief.

One woman was touched to find out that her neighbor has been giving fresh eggs to everyone on the block! She caught the sweetest footage of the elderly man stopping by to speak with her boyfriend. After that, he handed the younger man a package of eggs, too. The couple was touched by the lovely gesture! It turns out that the elderly gentleman is pretty organized when it comes to his acts of kindness. In order to make sure all his neighbors get their eggs, he has a system in place. The woman explained how it works in her video. @mikstupidb.tch this was soo precious :’) i wish i had the audio on it #foryou #viral #ring #daily #trend #tiktok ♬ original sound – ˚ · ⋆ ☆ ˚ · .⋆ “We just moved into the neighborhood and this older man that lives down the street comes to us with fresh eggs and says every neighbor just puts the empty box with their name on in it in his mailbox so he can refill them for everyone,” she wrote in her post. In the caption, she added, “This was soo precious.” Internet users are falling in love with this sweet neighbor. Commenters absolutely loved seeing this generous neighbor bringing fresh eggs to the new people on the block. Many users advised the couple to treasure this sweet man! “Pleaseeee check in on him!” one person wrote. “Make him feel like family! There aren’t many like him anymore and we need to cherish and protect the ones that do exist! Love that y’all got to experience someone like this.” Screengrab from TikTok Additionally, a few others came up with some great ways for this woman and her boyfriend to reciprocate! “Omg as someone who loves to bake I’d ask what his favorite treats are and use those eggs to bake him a sweet treat,” said one commenter. Another added, “Maybe invite him over for dinner or a cookout sometimes. Maybe he’s doing this bc he is lonely trying to make friends and enjoys getting out and talking to everyone.” These are excellent suggestions! You can find the source of this story’s featured image here. The post What Neighbors Should Be — Woman Shares Kind Gesture Elderly Neighbor Does For Families On His Block appeared first on InspireMore.

It’s been quite a big year for Colin Stough. At the start of 2024, the singer took a leap of faith by auditioning for American Idol. In fact, the reason he ended up doing so is because of encouragement he received from his mom, Nara. It didn’t take long for the then 18 year old to be oh-so grateful for his mom’s insistence. He blew the judges, and viewers, away with his country-rock style. In fact, he ended the competition in third place! As exciting as all of that has been, this latest milestone means even more to him… Colin Stough is engaged! Now 19 years old, Colin is happy to share that Mckenzie Rhett, a former Miss Jr. Teen in Mississippi, said “yes” when he asked her to marry him. He revealed this news to his followers on social media. The post includes lots of adorable (and silly) photos of the newly engaged couple. Check them out for yourself in the post below! View this post on Instagram A post shared by Colin Stough (@colinstough) “Only God knew that a pretty little angel would end up with a tatted up cowpoke,” Colin’s social media post reads. “I love you and this life with you and I can’t wait for the miles and the memories we will have to my best friend and my life partner. Let’s get married.” Colin Stough Shares Sweet Photos to Announce He’s Officially Engaged! Mckenzie was also quick to share the exciting news with her own followers. In her post, it seems that we see the moments that took place just around the time that Colin first popped the question. In any case, the pure joy on her face is the best! View this post on Instagram A post shared by Mckenzie Rhett (@mckenzierhett) As you can imagine, fans of the American Idol star couldn’t be happier for him and his fiancé. Both of their posts are full of well wishes and love! “Congratulations, you will sing beautifully to her at your wedding,” one fan writes, with American Idol finalist, Jack Blocker, adding, “Cmonnnnn.” You can find the source of this story’s featured image here! The post “American Idol” Star Gets Engaged To Former Miss Jr. Teen Mississippi In Touching Social Media Post appeared first on InspireMore.

Would you want to live with you? Were we a fly on the wall of your attitude, posture, and disposition at home, would you really want to live with you?