President Trump spoke with Ukraine’s President Zelensky today. He repeated his pledge to end the war. Donald Trump and JD Vance don’t want to send any more money to Ukraine. They both want peace. “President Zelenskyy of Ukraine and I had a very good phone call earlier today,” Trump wrote on his platform. “He congratulated […] The post President Trump Spoke with President Zelensky, War Came Up appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

Well, the RNC is over! And I think we’ve seen just about enough of what the Republican party has been reduced to under the so-called leadership of Donald Trump. It’s time for America to choose. Do we want a courageous leader like Joe Biden, who when he falls down, gets back up — whether he falls down going up a flight of stairs or trying to go up the flight of stairs again or even just walking across a room — he gets back up as many times as it takes to cross that room. Or do we want to descend to the level of a man like Donald Trump who when he falls down — because, you know, he’s been shot in the head by a bullet from an AR-15 sniper rifle — sure, he gets back up, but then he spits the bullet out, and shakes his fist at death and shouts, “Fight, fight, fight,” which frankly is just divisive. I, for one, was appalled by the RNC and its rampant display of Christian white nationalism, and Sikh white nationalism, and bi-racial rapper woman white nationalism, and even black white nationalism from people like Tim Scott who has so internalized white supremacy that he expects to be treated just like everybody else. It’s disgusting. And then there was Vivek Ramaswamy — and who even knows what the hell color he is with a name like that. It must be seven syllables at least, the guy could be purple for all we know. And this Rama whatever-his-name-is had the gall to stand up at the RNC and say that Americans should be able to disagree with one another openly and then still treat each other with respect, which is against everything the Democrat party stands for. Democrats understand that here in America, people are free to disagree with us, then be called racist, then be banned from YouTube and other social media, then be summoned to HR, fired from their jobs, and have their homes raided in the early morning hours by armed federal agents so they can be charged with any crime we can drum up, then spend the rest of their lives being harassed by screeching men with pink hair, face piercings and tattoos, who are taking female hormones until they turn into screeching women with pink hair, face piercings and tattoos who are indistinguishable from all the other Democrat voters. We will not allow some purple-faced Vivek Hamahooney to weaponize the First Amendment by using it to give a voice to people with other opinions than our own. That’s not who we are as Americans. WATCH: The Andrew Klavan Show While Republicans were at the RNC, wearing silly cowboy hats and screaming belligerently about their radical MAGA agenda of cutting taxes and standing up to our enemies, our president Joe Biden was having a civilized conversation with NBC’s Lester Holt. And sure, we couldn’t understand what he was saying half the time either, but the point is, he was setting a good example by sitting right there in close proximity to an almost black man and condemning Donald Trump for saying there would be a bloodbath and there were good people on both sides of the Charlottesville riots. And it was incredibly inspiring to see how Lester Holt respected this president so much that he didn’t once interrupt him to point out that none of that was true, which is what we expect from journalists. Because as Democrats, we believe that, if you don’t nod with servile conformity while we’re lying to you, you ain’t black. Or whatever Lester Holt is, you ain’t that either. Basically, if you don’t nod with servile conformity while we’re lying to you, as far as we’re concerned, you ain’t a journalist at all, no matter what color you are. So in conclusion, I am personally calling for four more years of Joe Biden, or whatever fraction of that time he’s got left. Because as President Biden himself said in his speech to the NAACP, “This country is gala-zeeben anyway to garoon the finchin fanchin booben deebee dobby.” And that’s exactly why President Biden will remain the Democrat candidate. Because we Democrats know that if you ever understand what we’re actually saying, we’re in deep trouble. * * * Andrew Klavan is the host of “The Andrew Klavan Show” at The Daily Wire. He is the bestselling author of the Cameron Winter Mystery series. The third installment, “The House of Love and Death,” is now available. Follow him on X: @andrewklavan This excerpt is taken from the opening satirical monologue of “The Andrew Klavan Show.” The views expressed in this satirical article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

As a growing number of prominent Democrats publicly call for President Joe Biden to bow out of the 2024 presidential race, many Americans are asking themselves a simple, yet complicated, question: what happens if Biden resigns? In the latest episode of “FACTS,” Daily Wire Editor Emeritus Ben Shapiro tackles that question and many others related to Biden’s age, cognitive decline, and apparent determination to remain in the presidential race despite a series of disastrous public appearances. WATCH: What happens if Joe Biden resigns? The President faces three potential scenarios—and there are significant constitutional, legal, and social implications for all three. Watch my latest episode of “Facts” where I break down each possible outcome. pic.twitter.com/VMSRSDSEXg — Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) July 19, 2024 In the episode, Shapiro outlines three potential scenarios that could play out before November 5: What happens if Joe Biden withdraws from the ticket, but does not resign the presidency? What happens if Joe Biden resigns? What happens if Joe Biden dies in office? The first scenario, Shapiro explains, “would be politically the worst case scenario for the Democrats, who would leave the next nominee carrying Joe Biden’s baggage without ever assuming the power of the presidency.” The main issue, as Shapiro points out, is that there is no way for the party to force Biden off the ticket if he is not ready to do so willingly. The delegates already pledged to him are bound by the “faithful delegate” rule, which the Democratic National Committee adopted in 1980 “to prevent delegates pledged to then President Jimmy Carter from defecting to Senator Ted Kennedy.” Shapiro goes on to explain that Biden withdrawing from the race — but not resigning the presidency — would likely lead to chaos. “If Biden steps down as presumptive nominee after securing the nomination but before the election, say, you know, like this week, the DNC would convene, select a new nominee. That process would involve consultation with Democratic governors, congressional leaders, party officials to ensure a smooth transition,” he says. “This decision could lead to significant internal conflicts within the Democratic Party, going all the way to the convention in Chicago.” The other two scenarios are far less complicated, at least politically, Shapiro notes. If Biden were to resign the presidency, for example, the 25th Amendment would take effect and the transition would likely be much smoother. “According to the Presidential Succession Act and the 25th Amendment, if Biden resigns the office of the presidency, then Vice President Harris immediately assumes the presidency,” Shapiro explains. “The process is clear cut. It has historical precedent. When Richard Nixon resigned in 1974 amidst Watergate, for example, Vice President Gerald Ford became president.” A similar scenario would play out if Biden were to pass away while still holding office, much like the transition from President Franklin Delano Roosevelt to President Harry S. Truman in 1945. But however smooth such a transition might be, it would not be without its complications. “The death of a sitting president always leads to a period of national mourning and a focus on maintaining stability and continuity. Presumably, Kamala Harris would at least attempt to accomplish just that,” Shapiro notes. “The sudden change in leadership would, of course, totally upend the 2024 election altering campaign strategies. The Democratic Party would undoubtedly then unify behind Harris in order to maintain electoral momentum … In fact, if a past president dies, the public tends to again have a lot of sympathy for the new president. While some, however, might rally around a new president, Kamala Harris, we live in a very polarized time. Others might question her legitimacy or her readiness.”

The Captain is among the dead

The video also captured the mother's screams for her baby

This damage threw the engine out of balance

'By enacting these measures, we continue to uphold the principles of safety, fairness, and common sense for all our citizens'

Donald Trump has a lot of things to celebrate this week, but a foregone conclusion in November isn’t one of them. Joe Biden is down in the polls and losing the unwinnable war against time’s toll. But Biden is nothing if not tenacious, and the president has a trick ready to turn Trump’s latest triumph— over an assassin’s bullet—into a political defeat. In his Oval Office remarks last Sunday, Biden tied the attempt on Trump’s life the day before to a litany of other acts of political violence, including the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol. Biden was returning to a winning theme from 2020, when the summer of rage following the death of George Floyd gave Democrats an opening to identify Trump with chaos. The Biden campaign’s next move is obvious enough—blame Trump and the GOP themselves for the assassination attempt by linking it to their position on guns. Just why 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks tried to murder Trump isn’t clear. But how he tried to do it is significant enough for Biden’s purposes: Crooks used a rifle, and whatever his ideological interests may have been, he’s confirmed to have been a firearms enthusiast. He tried out for his high school’s shooting team, belonged to a gun club, and died wearing the T-shirt of a pro-gun YouTube channel called Demolition Ranch. A vote for Trump, Democrats will say, is a vote for political instability and putting deadly weapons in the hands of unstable individuals like the Trump shooter. Republicans, meanwhile, have already sprung a trap on themselves. To score cheap political points, or because they’re simply victims of their own groupthink, Trump supporters have started echoing a theme of Democrats. They think they’re turning the tables on progressives by holding them accountable for creating a climate of violence with their extreme anti-Trump rhetoric. Trump even appears as Adolf Hitler on a recent New Republic cover. Isn’t that an incitement to murder the man? When Biden himself talks about putting Trump in a bull’s-eye, isn’t that language likely to lead to someone actually putting him in the crosshairs? Republicans never thought so before, whenever they used such “targeting” metaphors and progressives were the ones accusing them of inspiring violence. It shouldn’t take an exceptional degree of self-awareness for supporters of Donald Trump to recognize how hyping the dangers of intemperate language might backfire. Any comparison of Trump to Hitler is moronic, but it’s not an instigation. And if rude rhetoric were the deciding issue of the campaign, voters would be quick to send Trump into retirement—not only for the things he says but for the deranged utterances he elicits from his enemies’ mouths. Democrats are only too happy to wage a campaign on these terms. Their strategy calls for getting voters to see Biden, once again, as a force for calm and unity and Trump as a source of endless controversy, anger, and upheaval. Trump, on the other hand, has to court moderates without repudiating the right if he wants to match or surpass his 2016 victory. He needs the Republican base, including gun owners and pro-lifers, to turn out in full strength—but the no-compromise policies conservatives hope for are what many swing voters fear most. Trump was the president who built the Supreme Court majority that overturned Roe v. Wade. But he’s seen how referendums on abortion have turned out since then, and he’s determined not to let his campaign become one. Democrats are doing their utmost to turn it into just that. Biden is no moderate when it comes to guns or abortion, or almost anything else, but moderation is a message he’ll exploit to the fullest. He wants to be the no-drama candidate—a steady, mature hand at the wheel, even if one that’s a bit too mature. Trump at his best is an inimitable mixture of humor, optimism, urgency, and outrage. He takes the stage to opera, disco, and the Rolling Stones—drama is his element. Trump must, however, be seen to master the whirlwind, as he did when he rose to his feet and raised his fist defiantly after the assassin missed his shot. Biden seeks to turn his own mediocrity into a strength. It worked last time. Republicans shouldn’t help him do it—either by becoming complacent about their chances Nov. 5 or by adopting the Democrats’ framework on rhetoric and violence. COPYRIGHT 2024 CREATORS.COM We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal. The post Are Republicans Ready for Biden’s Counterattack? appeared first on The Daily Signal.

I think it was 2019 when I first interacted with Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio. I had just finished my judicial clerkship and begun my career in media. JD, just a few years older than me, was already a bestselling author and a tech venture capitalist. We were both interested in some of the energetic and ascendant elements of the Trump-era Right, and had followed each other on social media accordingly. We messaged about meeting up on the sidelines of the first-ever National Conservatism Conference (“NatCon 1”), held in Washington, D.C., in July 2019. I don’t think we actually met up amid the fracas, but JD gave a memorable speech. We’ve remained in touch ever since. Vance published two op-eds at Newsweek during my tenure as opinion editor. We have remained active with national conservatism and both spoke at the recent NatCon conference (“NatCon 4”). We are two of the founding advisory board members for American Moment, which seeks to “identify, educate, and credential” young leaders of the New Right. We have both been active with American Compass, a think tank that aims to reorient conservative economics away from doctrinaire libertarianism. We both spoke at the Restoring a Nation Conference in Steubenville, Ohio, in October 2022; we got dinner before his keynote speech, nerding out on public policy. Like a true American, JD downed two Miller Lites. We have also taken a similar path when it comes to former President Donald Trump. JD and I were both critical of Trump during the 2016 election but quickly came around as we saw the great achievements he secured in short order as president. We became vocal proponents of a more pragmatic, nimble, and dynamic Right—a Right, that is, which rejects the dog-eared playbook of yesteryear and prefers prudent statecraft to blindly following abstract dogma. We have been influenced by many of the same people and count some of the same people as friends. It is somewhat surreal to watch a friend be coronated as a major party’s vice presidential nominee. But JD Vance is not merely a spokesman for our particular corner of the American Right. Rather, he is an authentic voice for all those tens of millions of forgotten Americans who have been sold out by globalism and left in a cloud of dust by neoliberalism’s “free movement” of goods, labor, and capital. (Anyone who thinks neoliberalism has been “free” ought to walk around a town like Steubenville.) And JD is the best possible voice for frustrated millennials and Gen Zers who have inherited a country, following decades of boomer malpractice, where the social fabric is tattered and the American dream of upward economic mobility is all but dead. Our current predicament may seem dire, but JD was made for this moment. Out of the new American Right’s motley band of brothers, vice presidential nominee JD Vance has emerged as the chosen one— the one uniquely capable of giving voice to an entire disaffected generation or two and permanently transforming America’s cultural and political landscape. Trump would be wise to give JD an outsize role on the campaign trail and an even more outsize role in the presidential administration that is to come. In JD he will find someone who is not merely a talented communicator with an inspiring personal biography. Trump will also find someone who is highly thoughtful and has his finger squarely on the pulse of America’s economic and cultural ailments—and, perhaps most importantly, a keen sense of what public policy can actually do to tangibly improve Americans’ everyday lives. Vice President JD Vance will help advance a trade agenda and economic statecraft that meaningfully prioritizes the interests of places like Steubenville—not Wall Street. He will pursue policies that enable others to rise up through the economic ranks and live their own American dreams—just as he did. He will advance a realistic foreign policy that views every geopolitical issue and every global hotspot through the prism of the American national interest and the American way of life. Ultimately, as the now clear heir to the throne in a post-Trump Republican Party, JD Vance will have a unique opportunity to effectuate transformative change in American political life by scrambling arbitrary old political lines and building a durable, generational coalition of the broader center. Just as Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal and the post-Berlin Wall neoliberal “Washington consensus” helped define the parameters of “consensus” American political life in their own times, so too can JD Vance’s Republican Party—and the broader movement he will soon lead—usher in a new American epoch of cultural restoration, civilizational sanity, and material prosperity. JD Vance is only 39 years old; he turns 40 on Aug. 2 He has been Trump’s vice presidential nominee for less than a week. But to set the bar any lower would be a disservice to his prodigious talent. COPYRIGHT 2024 CREATORS.COM We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal. The post The Chosen One appeared first on The Daily Signal.

'WHO?' POTATUS a Couple Hostages Short of a Full Retort