A federal vaccine advisory panel has finally broken ranks, issuing a stark public warning that the COVID-19 vaccines are not safe for everyone, voting unanimously to shift official guidance away from blanket mandates and toward [...] The post CDC Issues Public Warning: “Don’t Get the COVID Vaccine – It’s Not Safe” appeared first on The People's Voice.

Bombshell government files — hacked, leaked, authenticated, and impossible to ignore — reveal Israel designated Charlie Kirk a “free-speech terrorist” slated for neutralization. Even worse: the same documents show they’ve warned President Trump that he’s [...] The post Israel Threatens To Kill Trump If He Exposes Truth About Charlie Kirk Assassination  appeared first on The People's Voice.

Will our favourite bands please stop retiring?!

A Hollywood celebrity’s declaration reflects broader cultural anxieties as Project 2025 looms on the horizon. O’Donnell’s Controversial Claim Rosie O’Donnell, a prominent comedian and activist, recently declared that “America is no more,” a statement that has reverberated across media platforms. Her comment stems from the perceived threat of Project 2025, a policy blueprint associated with a future Trump administration. The document, which many conservatives see as a corrective measure to liberal overreach, has sparked fears among progressive circles. O’Donnell, who is concerned for her nonbinary child’s safety, suggests she’ll leave the country if Trump returns to power. Her statements underscore a broader cultural anxiety about the direction of U.S. governance. While Project 2025 is hailed by some as a necessary reform, critics, including O’Donnell, argue it could undermine democratic norms and civil liberties. The clash between these perspectives reveals the deepening rift in American political life, where cultural and political identities often determine one’s view of governance and liberty. Project 2025: A Conservative Vision Project 2025 is viewed by its supporters as a roadmap for restoring what they see as fundamental American principles. Developed by conservative think tanks, it outlines policies that aim to enhance executive power and roll back what they argue are overreaches by previous administrations. This has drawn criticism from those concerned about potential impacts on civil rights, especially within the LGBTQ+ community. Critics allege that the project aims to centralize power and diminish protections for marginalized groups. The debate over Project 2025 highlights the ideological battles defining U.S. politics. Supporters argue it addresses fiscal mismanagement and global overreach, while opponents raise alarms about potential authoritarian shifts. As the 2024 election solidified Trump’s candidacy, discussions about the implications of such plans have intensified, reflecting a nation polarized by different visions of its future. Implications for American Society The discourse surrounding Rosie O’Donnell’s comments and Project 2025 has broader implications for American society. In the short term, it has increased anxiety among marginalized communities, leading to discussions about emigration and activism. Long-term, if implemented, Project 2025 could significantly alter civil rights landscapes, affecting governance and social cohesion. However, supporters believe it will restore order and protect constitutional values. As these debates unfold, the entertainment industry and advocacy sectors are likely to see intensified activism and efforts to safeguard rights. The political climate remains charged, with ongoing discussions about the balance between ensuring security and maintaining freedoms. These conversations are crucial as U.S. policies evolve under potentially new leadership. Sources: In the Fascist Regime that is the U.S., We Are All Rosie O’Donnell

EXCLUSIVE: Corporate Watchdog Commends Major Banks For Taking Steps To Prevent Political, Religious ‘Debanking’

Is it really too much to ask that a murdered young man be given the dignity of a proper burial before bad-faith opportunists attempt to posthumously rewrite his legacy to better serve their own nefarious ends? Is it really too much to ask that a murdered young man’s family and friends—to say nothing of the countless individuals whose lives the young man touched and inspired—be allowed to mourn in peace, without having to fend off charlatans seeking to hijack his memory to advance their pet crusades? Apparently, the answer is: Yes, it is. The body of my friend Charlie Kirk, who was tragically assassinated last week during a campus event in Utah by a leftist transgender-adjacent “furry” fetishist, had barely returned home to Arizona before some grifters on the ostensible “right” started trying to capitalize on his memory. Instead of focusing on the metastasizing evil of a distinctly leftist political violence or the fact that transgenderism had yet again found itself implicated in a horrific shooting, as any sane conservative would have done, these agents of chaos decided it would be most appropriate to “just ask questions” about—you guessed it—the Jews. Disgraced podcaster Candace Owens, never one to miss any opportunity to slander Jewish people, took precious time away from her Brigitte Macron legal defense to suggest that Jewish people or the Jewish state of Israel were somehow involved in Kirk’s assassination. To hear Owens tell it: Kirk, a lifelong vocal supporter of the Jewish people and the Jewish state, was souring on Israel and was getting close to publicly adopting a hostile stance. Oh, and what’s more—per Owens, Bill Ackman, the billionaire hedge funder and proud Zionist, staged an “intervention” with Kirk during a retreat last month in the Hamptons where Ackman pressured Kirk to “get in line” on the Israel issue. Notably, numerous high-profile cable news has-beens have legitimized Owens’ outrageous laundering of a left-wing political assassination into an antisemitic caper. Where to begin? I spoke with Kirk less than 24 hours before his untimely death. The night before, a right-wing rabbi friend and I held a Zoom call with Kirk and a few others. During this call, Kirk, an unapologetic Christian Zionist who was greatly distressed by rising antisemitism in some pockets of the Right, asked us a series of Israel-related questions that he anticipated receiving on his upcoming campus tour. We answered those questions and provided messaging advice for how to best communicate and win over students. At one point, Kirk joked to me that he would simply direct students toward my book, “Israel and Civilization,” when Israel came up on tour. It beggars belief that someone on the verge of renouncing Israel would organize this call just before embarking on a campus tour. As for the Hamptons retreat last month: I was there. Kirk had personally texted me to invite me, and I had inscribed book copies for two special retreat attendees—Kirk and Ackman. Put simply, there was no “intervention”—not from Ackman, not from Babylon Bee CEO Seth Dillon, not from anyone else. The retreat featured numerous open-ended conversations, usually moderated by Kirk, and only one of which was actually about Israel itself. The conversations were spirited and robust but hardly rancorous. Kirk was critical of the way some pro-Israel advocates advanced their arguments, but he was not critical of the underlying substance. On the contrary, he only doubled down on his opposition to Islam and suggested that Israel is a natural ally in the fight against jihadism. Ackman and Kirk interacted very amicably. This is who Kirk was: He focused on building bridges and maintaining big-tent coalitions within the broader Right. He had no interest in dividing, tearing down or ostracizing. And he had a long, well-established track record of befriending Jews—like me—and defending the Jewish state of Israel. His May letter to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the existence of which the premier confirmed on Fox News last week and which I was given access to earlier this year, makes his affection very clear. Kirk’s own pastor and spiritual mentor, Rob McCoy, has made it clear as well. At a time when the focus should be on ending the potentially existential threat of left-wing domestic political violence, Owens and other instigators have embarked upon the ultimate gaslighting crusade: Lie to our faces and pretend that Kirk was something other than the champion of Jewish-Christian relations that he demonstrably was, while simultaneously insinuating “the Jews” may have had something to do with his horrific assassination. All of this, moreover, while so many of us simply wish to mourn and honor our fallen friend. From a personal perspective, such behavior is reprehensible. And from a political perspective, it is outright evil. Nor is such a buffoonish “just asking questions” ruse evil merely because of how it seeks to fracture the Jewish-Christian alliance that is the only hope of saving the West—something Kirk fought for every day. It is also evil because such appalling idiocy and grotesque conspiracy-mongering threatens to repel the overwhelming majority of Americans who remain coherent and sane, and who may well conclude that they want nothing to do with a political movement that entertains such cranks. It is not merely the Jewish-Christian alliance that these reprobates are threatening, then. They are also threatening the integrity and viability of the MAGA coalition, which no one did more to hold together than Kirk. Truly, could there be any greater desecration of Kirk’s memory than that? COPYRIGHT 2025 CREATORS.COM We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal. The post Grifters Desecrating Charlie Kirk’s Memory Could Implode MAGA appeared first on The Daily Signal.

An increasing number of alleged murderers, mass shooters, and violent offenders have apparently tried to silence Christians or critics of transgender ideology, acting on the assumption that those who disagree with transgender claims represent a violent threat. The tragic assassination of Charlie Kirk only underscores this unnerving trend, and makes the case for the FBI to formally characterize the threat of transgender ideology violent extremism. The Oversight Project and The Heritage Foundation formally called on the FBI Thursday to use its authority under 18 U.S. Code § 2331 to designate this threat, and I wholeheartedly agree. The FBI declined to comment on the subject when approached Friday. That statute defines domestic terrorism as activities on U.S. soil that “involve acts dangerous to human life” that violate federal or state criminal laws that “appear to be intended” to intimidate or coerce civilians, influence government policy, or affect government conduct via mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping. Current domestic violent extremism categories include: racially/ethnically motivated violent extremism; anti-government/anti-authority violent extremism; animal rights/environmental violent extremism; abortion-related violent extremism; and nihilistic violent extremism. The Oversight Project and Heritage recommend categorizing transgender ideology violent extremism as typically targeting “Christian and religious groups;” featuring “mental illness, self-harm, suicidal tendencies, and lack of respect for genetic human realities, amplified by online radicalization;” and boosted by “echo chambers that promote violence against critics.” Most people who identify as transgender likely do not pose a threat to their fellow Americans, but a growing list of attackers either identified as transgender or appear to be motivated by transgender ideology. pic.twitter.com/lWSeuNYoLw— Oversight Project (@ItsYourGov) September 18, 2025 Transgender-Motivated Violence and Threats Last weekend, Utah Gov. Spencer Cox confirmed reports that 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, who has been charged with Charlie Kirk’s murder, was living with a boyfriend who identifies as transgender. Robinson reportedly confessed to his boyfriend that he committed the murder. Authorities reportedly confirmed that 23-year-old Robin Westman, a male born Robert Westman, opened fire at Annunciation Church in Minneapolis last month, killing two children and injuring 17 others. Audrey Elizabeth Hale, 28, reportedly identified as male. She shot and killed three children and three adults on March 27, 2023, at The Covenant School, a Presbyterian school in Nashville, Tennessee. Police fatally shot her during the attack. According to a court document obtained by The Daily Signal, the man who tried to assassinate Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh in June 2022 identifies as a woman. Nicholas Roske, who was 29 when he pleaded guilty in April, identifies as Sophie Roske in a court document. On May 7, 2019, then-16-year-old Maya “Alec” McKinney and her 19-year-old fellow student, Devon Erickson, opened fire at STEM School Highlands Ranch in Highlands Ranch, Colorado, killing one and injuring eight. Both have been sentenced to life in prison. McKinney, a female, identifies as male. On Sept. 20, 2018, 26-year-old Snochia Moseley shot and killed four people at a Rite Aid distribution center in Aberdeen, Maryland, before killing herself. A close friend of Moseley’s told The Washington Post the perpetrator identified as transgender. In June 2024, a judge sentenced Jason Lee Willie, a man who identifies as a woman and goes by Alexia, to one year in prison after he pleaded guilty to threatening to injure people across state lines. Willie, a resident of Nashville, Illinois, confessed to threatening to rape girls in girls’ restrooms, carry out a mass shooting at schools, and bomb churches. Hatred Toward Christians Many of these offenders targeted Christians or threatened them because of their faith. The transgender movement encourages a victimization narrative that may play a role in radicalizing these people. The Human Rights Campaign, the premier transgender activist group, has described the deaths of people identifying as transgender as an “epidemic.” However, Brad Palumbo at Quillette crunched the numbers and concluded that the “Human Rights Campaign’s own data suggest trans Americans suffer a homicide risk that’s actually less than the U.S. average.” This claim represents the fountainhead of a constant stream of hyperbolic transgender rhetoric. For instance, MSNBC columnist Katelyn Burns once described a move to restrict the Frankensteinian treatments of “gender-affirming care” as an act of genocide. Supporters of “gender-affirming care” maintain—with a straight face—that people with gender dysphoria (the painful and persistent identification with the gender opposite one’s sex) cannot prevent themselves from committing suicide if they do not receive these interventions. Yet, at the Supreme Court, the lawyer arguing for “gender-affirming care” admitted there is “no evidence” these interventions reduce suicide. Online influencers who identify as transgender have amassed huge followings, and members of their audiences may find themselves bombarded with hyperbolic rhetoric about the “hate” of those who dare to disagree with their preferred pronouns. In fact, the influential Southern Poverty Law Center repeatedly compares conservative Christians who disagree with transgender orthodoxy to the KKK. If you legitimately believed that there is an “epidemic” of murder against people like you, that opposition to your agenda is a form of “genocide,” and that Christians’ disagreement with transgender identity is fueling this, you might be tempted to lash out. The FBI should designate Transgender Ideology Violent Extremism and try to prevent further attacks. The transgender movement also needs to take a long, hard look in the mirror and start cooling down the doomsday rhetoric. Most Christians who disagree with transgender identity do so not because they hate anyone, but because they follow the Bible and basic biology, which show that human beings are male and female and cannot change their sex merely by saying so. The post Transgender Ideology Is Motivating Violence: It’s High Time the FBI Designate It as Such appeared first on The Daily Signal.

The Anti-Communist Film Festival: Whittaker Chambers and 'Witness'