YubNub Social YubNub Social
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Day mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

100 Percent Fed Up Feed
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
5 d

‘Very Embarrassing’: Scott Jennings Shares Blunt Prediction About Crockett’s Senate Bid
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

‘Very Embarrassing’: Scott Jennings Shares Blunt Prediction About Crockett’s Senate Bid

US Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) has provided the right with a significant amount of fodder in recent months as she goes from one mainstream media outlet to another spewing a mix of conspiracy theories and outright fabrications about Republicans. But among many of her fellow Democrats, the brash lawmaker represents the preferred tactic for discussing politics in 2025. For Scott Jennings, the pundit CNN calls on to provide a counterargument to its endless parade of leftist talking heads, Crockett’s schtick will probably be enough to secure her a primary victory in her recently announced Senate campaign. But as he said in a recent interview, her general election chances stand at roughly zero. Per the Daily Caller: “The Democratic base wants Crockett. They want someone who portrays herself and their party in the way that she does on cable news 24 hours a day or the way that she does on social media … Her constituents are people on TikTok, people on Instagram, people in the newsrooms,” he added. “Her constituents have nothing to do with the people she represents. I mean, she lives in this fantasy online world. And she also lives in a world where you can say anything, whether it’s true or not, and then deny everything you said, even though you did say it.” Crockett claimed on CNN’s “The Source” on Nov. 19 that she “wasn’t trying to mislead people” when she falsely claimed that Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin received political contributions from deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. She made the false suggestion on the House floor on Nov. 18, but the donations in question were from another Jeffrey Epstein. Moreover, the Democrat suggested in a December 2024 Vanity Fair profile that Latinos who voted for President Donald Trump have a “slave mentality” because they oppose illegal immigration. Yet during a Tuesday appearance on “The Lead with Jake Tapper,” she denied saying they have a “slave mentality” despite Tapper reciting her own remarks back to her. “It’s very embarrassing, but for some reason, Democrats have embraced this communication style as their future,” Jennings said. “And so, I actually think she’s going to win that primary. I think she’s going to get beat in the general election.” Crockett’s campaign has also drawn significant criticism on social media: TEXAS SENATE CANDIDATE JASMINE CROCKETT: We need illegal migrants in America because we done pickin’ cotton! Major mask-off statement. Holy smokes. Pummel this woman in the 2026 election, Texas. Send a message. pic.twitter.com/RR5gVnPces — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) December 13, 2025 Jazzy Jumps in! It’s official: Jasmine Crockett has entered the Texas Senate race, and her announcement went EXACTLY how you would expect: -Insulting the voters she needs to win-A long, strange video of herself -Major media mishaps pic.twitter.com/48FwipnpWg — 10 Minute Drill (@10minutedrill) December 10, 2025 Jasmine Crockett is going to be the Democratic nominee for Senate in Texas. @davidmdrucker of The Dispatch sizes up the consequences. https://t.co/WfM8KKnLGV pic.twitter.com/fyzsiSxZEw — HughHewittShowLinks (@HHSLinks) December 9, 2025 As Axios reported, Crockett’s ascension is getting under the skin of some other Democrats on Capitol Hill: Many in the party fear the anti-Trump firebrand will alienate swing voters and drag down Democrats in the state if she clinches the nomination — including in several key House races that could decide control of the lower chamber. “She might win a primary, but she ain’t winning a general in Texas,” said a senior House Democrat who, like others quoted in this story, spoke on the condition of anonymity to offer candid thoughts about a colleague. “It’s concerning for [swing] districts … I think it’s a bad decision,” said a second House Democrat. What she’s saying: “It’s hard to get a clear picture of who the Texans are from the fog of Washington,” Crockett shot back in a statement to Axios. “My message is one that reaches people who are often ignored by the political class. I’m not running a campaign focused on insider politics … I’m focused on reaching all 30 million Texans and earning their trust.” Here’s some more commentary about Crockett’s attention-grabbing entry into the 2026 Senate campaign: Jasmine Crockett’s campaign ad is a perfect representation of the Democratic party: saying nothing and focusing solely on Trump.@ggreenwald on Crockett’s bid for Senate: pic.twitter.com/3DtNcZriL7 — System Update (@SystemUpdate_) December 10, 2025 And here’s a relevant clip from Jennings’ recent podcast interview:
Like
Comment
Share
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
5 d

BREAKING: Person of Interest in Custody for Brown University Sh**ting
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

BREAKING: Person of Interest in Custody for Brown University Sh**ting

A person-of-interest has been taken into custody for the mass shooting at Brown University on Saturday that killed two students and left many others injured. Police say they are not currently looking for any other suspects, and the university lockdown has been lifted. Students have been dismissed for winter break, with all final exams canceled. The shooting appears like it may have been a targeted attack, with the suspect going to a specific classroom where students were studying for an economics exam. This clip from Fox News broke down what we know so far: BREAKING: Brown University lockdown LIFTED after a person of interest is in custody for the mass shooting That’s good, at least. LATEST:– The shooter “yelled something” and began shooting– Reportedly used a handgun– 7-story physics and engineering building, unlocked-… pic.twitter.com/J6WJwfl99P — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) December 14, 2025 BREAKING: Brown University lockdown LIFTED after a person of interest is in custody for the mass shooting That’s good, at least. LATEST: – The shooter “yelled something” and began shooting – Reportedly used a handgun – 7-story physics and engineering building, unlocked – Went to a “specific classroom” that was a study session for an economics exam The FBI previously released this video of the suspect, dressed in all black, walking down the street: Help find this Person of Interest. If you have any information, please call 1-800-CALL-FBI (225-5324) or https://t.co/iL7sD5efWD. pic.twitter.com/AkFDVtOCmw — FBI (@FBI) December 14, 2025 At this time, details about the person-of-interest’s identity have not been released. Watch what police had to say about the suspect here: BREAKING – Police now have a suspect in the mass shooting at Brown University but are refusing to provide the suspect’s age, race, or motive, only stating that the shooter “yelled something” before the attack and that the weapon used has a “unique characteristic” on it. pic.twitter.com/971tJeYDUU — Right Angle News Network (@Rightanglenews) December 14, 2025 But, rumors are spreading that it could have been another Islamic terror attack. Some reports indicate that the “something” this monster yelled before opening fire was “Allahu Akbar.” Laura Loomer claimed that sources have confirmed the attacker was Muslim: MASS SHOOTER AT BROWN TARGETED CLASSROOM OF PROFESSOR WHO TAUGHT JUDAIC STUDIES AT @BrownUniversity. THE PROFESSOR ALSO TAUGHT ABROAD IN ISRAEL! Why is the media protecting the murderous Muslim who killed innocent people at Brown University? Source tells me the Democrat… https://t.co/snEWinnSn5 pic.twitter.com/yegBXsuPu7 — Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) December 14, 2025 MASS SHOOTER AT BROWN TARGETED CLASSROOM OF PROFESSOR WHO TAUGHT JUDAIC STUDIES AT @BrownUniversity . THE PROFESSOR ALSO TAUGHT ABROAD IN ISRAEL! Why is the media protecting the murderous Muslim who killed innocent people at Brown University? Source tells me the Democrat officials in Rhode Island and woke administrators at Brown are doing all they can to hide the fact that the shooter at Brown University was a Muslim who targeted the classroom of Professor Rachel Friedberg, who taught Judaic Studies in edition to Economics. A source told me students heard the shooter scream “ALLAHU AKBAR” before he opened fire, but the PC culture of Brown has them afraid of being called “Islamophobic”. Source tells me Police and @FBI agents on the ground have also been instructed by Democrat officials on the ground in Rhode Island to not say the words “Muslim” or “Islamic terror”. At this time, we cannot independently verify whether or not the attack was related to Islamic terror. We only know that the suspect is reportedly not a student at the university. He was apprehended at a hotel early Sunday morning. ABC News provided the latest update: A person of interest was taken into custody early Sunday in connection with the fatal mass shooting at Brown University, according to Kristy DosReis, a spokesperson for the Providence Police Department. The person in custody was caught about 3:45 a.m. at a hotel in Coventry, R.I., about 28 miles south of Providence, according to law enforcement sources and Coventry police. At the time the person was detained, the individual was allegedly in possession of two guns, according to sources. “We have detained a person of interest,” Providence Mayor Brett Smiley said at a Sunday-morning news conference. “We are lifting the shelter-in-place.” Rhode Island law enforcement authorities said no one else is being sought in the shooting that occurred Saturday on the Ivy League campus and left two people dead and nine others injured, according to officials. The residents of Providence can “breathe a little easier,” Smiley said. A tip from the public led police to a Hampton Inn in Coventry, where the person of interest was detained, according to sources. A federal source told ABC News the person was only being called a person of interest at this point, but added that they were confident they were on the right track. The person in custody is not a student at the university, sources familiar with the situation said.
Like
Comment
Share
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
5 d

Why is China Buying Farmland Near Military Bases?
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

Why is China Buying Farmland Near Military Bases?

It’s one of the most underreported threats in America right now: The Chinese Government is quietly acquiring critical farmland right here in the United States. We’re talking acres, just outside of our U.S. military bases. What’s the real plan here? No one buys wheat fields next to missile command unless something bigger is going on. Now Trump’s team is enacting a national security response:  to take it back before it’s too late. The clock’s ticking. The land is already in enemy hands. And your future is at risk. Click here to get the full story –  before this breach becomes a disaster. (Note: Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message in this article and ordering through the included links, which benefits WLTReport. We appreciate your support!  MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!)
Like
Comment
Share
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
5 d

DISGUSTING: MSM Now Using Charlie Kirk Murder To Push CENSORSHIP
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

DISGUSTING: MSM Now Using Charlie Kirk Murder To Push CENSORSHIP

I’m old enough to have heard this one before, first with the advent of the Internet, then again with the advent of Social Media, and now once again with the resurgence of free Social Media after Elon Musk freed Twitter… And the story basically goes like this: We can’t possibly let people investigate and think for themselves, that’s “brain rot”! The plebs are asking far too many questions, and they’re no longer swallowing the narrative we are telling them so Social Media must be really bad!  We have to stop it! And they’re now rolling out that exact same playbook now with regard to the murder of Charlie Kirk, calling it “brain rot” that “seemingly otherwise sane people” (their words not mine) are not accepting at face value that of course Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk and how dare you investigate or ask questions at all to the contrary! Except….that’s not our system. And Charlie Kirk of all people RAILED against censorship like this, so to now use his name to push the very thing he hated is despicable.  But that’s exactly what they’re doing. How disappointing to see what Bari Weiss has become (or perhaps always was). Watch here: He was murdered 3 months ago. If you go on the internet and, frankly, it has leapt beyond the internet now into real life, and you talk to many seemingly sane people, they do not believe that the 22-year-old named Tyler Robinson that has been arrested and charged with his murder is the actual murderer. They believe—Who do they think—Yeah. They, they believe any number of theories. They believe that Erica Kirk was his Mossad handler and that he was killed by a foreign government. They believe that she was tracked by Egyptian planes. They believe that the rings on her hand are signs of Illuminati. The theories themselves are absurd. What matters is that—She speaks about this in the interview. The brain rot that social media is allowing to spread, the way that it is detaching us from humanity, from our ability to talk to one another and our ability to discern the truth from just out-and-out lies is something that is incredibly important as a, as a theme, I think. That’s what’s so strange. MEMO TO BARI WEISS (tune out now if Franklin Graham is reading this): Bari, you can go fuck yourself with a ten foot steel pole and GTFO when this garbage! That’s not how America works. That’s not how Free Speech works. The official narrative might be true, but we don’t have to accept it point blank and be prohibited from investigating and asking questions. Also, I remember when Journalists honored and revered the First Amendment (and the 5th, 14th and 6th) and understood the most basic concept of “Innocent until proven guilty.” Look at Bari out here calling it “Brain rot” if we don’t just accept that OBVIOUSLY Tyler Robinson is guilty before the trial has even began! Can you get any more Un-American than that? Look, I’m not here to defend Tyler Robinson.  Quite frankly, those videos of him in Court from a few days ago make it look like he’s quite evil…. But I AM here to defend Free Speech, Investigative Journalism and the search for TRUTH. And you, Bari Weiss, are not the final arbiter of what is Truth, even though you seem to think you are way up on your high horse. So now they want to use Charlie’s name to push censorship. Unbelievable. And this is who has the big town hall with Erika tonight. Also, who has benefited greatly during this administration via Ellison. https://t.co/oc0peYIKza — Owen Shroyer (@OwenShroyer1776) December 13, 2025 The entire Town Hall was a disaster…. Here is Weiss making another horrible decision to invite this guy to confront Erika Kirk: CBS had the man who asked Charlie Kirk his last question, while still alive, to Erika Kirk’s Town Hall. He asked Erika Kirk to condemn Donald Trump’s past rhetoric. Whoever told CBS this was a good idea should be fired.pic.twitter.com/AIXjDSJR3a — Evan Kilgore (@EvanAKilgore) December 14, 2025 Garbage move. This also emerged from the Town Hall and is very strange: Erika Kirk Gives Very Bizarre Excuse For The Egyptian Planes Set aside any personal feelings you have about Erika Kirk (love her, distrust her, whatever else) set that all aside and in this article I simply want to talk about facts. Fair enough? Specifically, I want to focus on these Egyptian Planes that Candace Owens keeps talking about. And same with Candace, please set aside any personal feelings you have about her (love her, distrust her, whatever else) set all that aside and just focus on facts. And those facts are that Candace has been alleging that for the prior two years, Egyptian Planes have been tracking Erika Kirk, with the Egyptian Planes overlapping with Erika Kirk's flights over 70 times in the past few years, which statistically speaking is nearly impossible to be random chance: BREAKING: Candace Owens now believes the unusual Egyptian planes were actually tracking Erika Kirk and not Charlie. The Egyptian plane overlapped with Erika's flight travels about 70 times the past few years. That is a 0.000000001% chance. This is actually mindblowing. pic.twitter.com/YrjW5mxt0w — Evan Kilgore ?? (@EvanAKilgore) November 17, 2025 Again, I'm not saying Candace is right, I'm just saying that's the allegation. Now we go to the new Townhall Erika Kirk just did on CBS. I have no idea who is watching these two small children, but I do know given how often Erika is on CBS, Fox News and any other network that will have it, it's not her most of the time.  But I digress.... So Erika went on a Townhall on CBS and responded to the Egyptian Planes allegations.  Kind of. She definitely felt the need to talk about them and debunk the claims, but instead of debunking the claims that Egyptian Planes had been tracking her movements for over two years, she debunked the claim that she was flying on the Egyptian Planes. No one ever alleged that. This is really strange, watch here: EXPOSED: Erika Kirk's Bizarre CBS Excuse for Egyptian Surveillance Flights —She Debunks Claim NOBODY Made About Egyptian Planes! Why So Defensive? Erika Kirk just went on a PRE-STAGED CBS Town Hall (complete with Deep State favorite Bari Weiss as the "interviewer") and… https://t.co/PNiWC8M6zw pic.twitter.com/XD5JZaFcAr — Project Constitution (@ProjectConstitu) December 14, 2025 Here is the full X post from @ProjectConstitution because I think it's very well said and spot on: EXPOSED: Erika Kirk's Bizarre CBS Excuse for Egyptian Surveillance Flights —She Debunks Claim NOBODY Made About Egyptian Planes! Why So Defensive? Erika Kirk just went on a PRE-STAGED CBS Town Hall (complete with Deep State favorite Bari Weiss as the "interviewer") and delivered the most tone-deaf, strawman-filled rant yet about the Egyptian planes tracking her. She actually laughed off the Egyptian surveillance flights as “haha funny” because—she claims—she was pregnant for “90% of those trips” and too busy craving In-N-Out and chocolate milkshakes to hop on any Egyptian plane. Hold up. NOBODY ever accused Erika of personally flying ON those Egyptian planes. We said intelligence-linked Egyptian aircraft were TRACKING her movements for TWO FULL YEARS—objectively verified by multiple flight data sources. Was she pregnant for 24 straight months to cover the entire tracking period? That would shatter every medical record in history. Pregnant women fly commercially all the time (up to certain points)—but that’s irrelevant because, again, nobody said she was a passenger. Most chilling: She ends with “Game on.” GAME ON?! This isn’t a reality show, Erika. Your husband was brutally assassinated. Lives—including Candace Owens’—are still in danger. Yet you treat legitimate questions about foreign surveillance aircraft monitoring your every move as a joke? If mysterious planes from a foreign government were shadowing YOU for years, wouldn’t you demand answers—especially AFTER they murdered your spouse? But Erika’s not curious at all. Instead, she attacks a claim nobody made. That’s classic deflection: build a strawman, knock it down, and hope everyone stops asking the real questions. This scripted CBS appearance—questions pre-approved, narrative tightly controlled—only proves one thing: the Egyptian plane story terrifies them. When they rush out Bari Weiss (the regime’s go-to “independent journalist”) and have you mocking the issue with milkshake jokes, it means we’re directly over the target. Keep digging, patriots. The planes are the key. They’re panicking for a reason. Justice for Charlie. The truth doesn’t care about your scripted town halls. Backup video here if needed: Now we go to Candace who did an excellent job completely tearing apart the fake and staged Townhall ran by CBS's Bari Weiss. Watch here: FULL TRANSCRIPT: Not my opinion that these questions were preselected, it's a fact. a fact. Like I said, we have insiders, the questions were preselected. And one of the preselected questions was for Erika, and this will come out on Saturday, uh, setting the stage for her to condemn antisemitism, to which she responds and speaks about, as I told you yesterday, how Turning Point will be hosting a Shabbat dinner. And in case the direction of travel for CBS under the stewardship of Bari Weiss is not clear, they even brought in, during this town hall, the father of the young woman who was shot in DC at the Jewish Museum. I think that that was an IDF soldier, I might be wrong about that. They also brought out Hunter Kozak, who asked the last question to Charlie Kirk. They filled the audience with people selected by, uh, CBS, College Republicans, with questions selected by CBS. So it just is objectively a controlled and a managed situation, a controlled and a managed conversation, if you will. But, and you can predict this, if you are at home this Saturday and you watch this and you're just, you know, a regular old person around the world and you go, "This feels really scripted," the influencers are gonna come out and they're gonna mark you as evil, demonic even. How dare you ques- what, are you kidding me? This is like, you're not allowed to say that this feels scripted ever, even though it, this entire thing since September 10th feels scripted to me. But that's not it, okay, we're gonna get more, because Erika also sat down with Glenn Beck of Blaze TV. Now, again, this is all a part of a PR blitz for Charlie's upcoming book on honoring the Shabbat, which I'm not gonna be doing, because I'm Christian. So I'd like to already just say no, okay? Anyways, Glenn Beck's interview has a bunch of high points, if you will, foremost Erika stressing that she believes that the truth is clear. Take a listen. Glenn Beck: I don't know how you handle this, Erika. I don't know how th- to be dragged into, you know, you were involved in the death, and all this crazy, evil stuff. Oh, it's sick. God bless you. It's sick. God bless you. I don't know. Erika: It is. My family means everything to me. Turning Point USA has always been in our life and has always been so good to Charlie, and Charlie was good to his team. Everyone loved Charlie. Yeah. I get that. Everyone wants, everyone wants an answer to this evil, and sometimes the answer is very clear. Yeah. The truth is- You know, I- very clear. So I just wanna say to, first and foremost, Glenn setting that question up, I can't find, to this day, 'cause this just feels to me to be like the, the ultimate straw man, any commentator that has explicitly accused Erika of killing Charlie Kirk. I've seen psychological manipulation of influencers trying to say that if you critique Turning Point, that's akin to accusing Erika Kirk of killing her husband, which is utterly ridiculous. But I have never seen, and maybe I missed it, I've seen a lot, somebody come out and say, "Erika Kirk murdered Charlie." But that's what they set up always, which is like, I don't know how you are d- I've seen people digging into her background, I've seen people speaking about her Romanian charity, uh, her, I've seen people, uh, looking into her mother, all of that. I've seen all of that, but I have not yet seen where this idea that they keep trying to seed into our minds that asking any questions is a, uh, is equivalent to accusing her of murder. That that, even that feels manipula- m- m- manipulative to me. Then comes in this totally organic question from Glenn Beck, totally organic, right? And this is going to be the extreme appeal to authority which is, "Okay, if we don't wanna answer any questions, we're just gonna say you don't understand, um, how the court works. Don't, you shouldn't be asking questions, 'cause that's gonna, that could potentially ruin the upcoming trial." Take a listen. Glenn Beck: You concerned about, th- th- his assassin is in court today. Are you concerned about being able to have a jury that's not been tainted? Erika: No, it's, it's, it's a j- it's a real thing, Glenn, and you, and you get this. A lot of people don't, and I think that we need to do a better job of educating our citizens about our court systems. A lot of people don't know how a d- an actual trial plays out. I know. I am very curious about how the UnitedHealthcare case plays out. We are living in a day and age where social media can absolutely impact Uh, I, I feel it can. The reason I say that is because I don't want a tainted jury pool. I want justice for my husband. Any time we have leads, any time we hear anything, we send it to the authorities. We're not messing around. W- none of us are involved in my husband's murder, none of us, Turning Point USA, myself, any of these other crazy accusations, none of us. Okay, so this is what I mean where I, I, I just feel like we're just doing the same thing over and over and over again in politics, where you can just apply any situation, like this is, it's how it starts, it's like they come up with a narrative and it feels really stupid. Uh, you could, like apply this to COVID, whatever. And then people start asking questions, 'cause it feels really stupid, and then they tell you, like, "Oh, I wish you guys were more educated about" s- science, I wish you guys were more educated about doctors and nurses, and, like, you're just not there. I wish you could explain to you how these things work, but you, you, you're gonna have to trust the experts. Um, and, yeah, I, I actually think that also, and because you guys are not trusting the experts, we're going to have to censor people on social media, as they did during COVID, because social media is problematic. Actually, the problem is free speech, ultimately, right? Like the problem is that you have people on social media who are talking common sense, and they don't understand this. Okay? That, that's like I just, that doesn't work for me. It doesn't work for me, and it shouldn't work for you. And this next portion is where we get into the mass formation psychosis element, which is when, uh, i- th- they're trying to modify our behavior, the m- the behavior of the masses, and they kinda want us to all form around this idea. And h- this is, this is kind of actually the we're all in this together psychology that you're about to see, right? The higher calling element of the psychological conditioning, the you guys are focusing on the minutiae of, of that day and whether or not the government is involved with assassinating Charlie Kirk. But, you know, Tim Pool's telling you guys midterms, there's midterms, and there's things. That's the higher calling, right? The masses, the masses sh- sh- should get around that higher calling. Like even if it goes against your gut to mask your toddler, even if it goes against your gut to let your grandma die alone in a hospital, even if something is screaming at you, and you're saying, "Why does this all feel abusive?" Like abusive to toddlers, abusive to our grandparents to let them die alone. Why, why does it feel to me, my instinct tells me that we shouldn't put medical masks on a toddl- on toddlers who can't see expressions. Well, the higher calling is that you should always ignore your gut, right? Because we're, we're all in this together, and there's, there's something bigger that we can aspire to. They said you'd violate your gut instinct, and that's what's coming next. Take a listen. Glenn Beck: I don't need you to comment on this, but I think mental illness is involved in, uh, in some of this, uh, stuff that is online. Erika: Yeah. A- and, and Glenn, I'll be honest. I think it's really- I, I am not- Honestly, I feel bad it's mentally- I am not going to waste my time. it's mental illness. I'm not gonna waste my time in, in, um, combating people- He was sweet. I, we, like- Yeah. going toe-to-toe, calling people names. I, I don't, I don't, I just That's just not me. That's not how Charlie operated. We There's no reason for me to go down a, a, a dark place like that. Mm-hmm. I, I am so tired of the fracture. What drives me nuts is that Charlie, uh, he has worked and provided- It's all good. and has blessed us with so much, like literally his book. He has blessed us with so much wisdom, so much, um He's just such a good thought leader. He, he blessed us with, with laser focus on the mission on saving this country, but instead, we're so focused on who did what. Like, yes, we will figure all that out. Mm-hmm. Yes, this is a murder case. He was n- He did not die in a car crash. Yes, that will be handled, but my husband's legacy is not about his murder. My husband's legacy- And- is what he left behind. I just reject that. Okay? I reject that there's a higher calling that we need to all get around and the legacy of Char- Like, actually, the legacy, if we find out that the government is implicated, and it looks like to me th- And I think a lot of people on the outside, the government is implicated. Otherwise, it wouldn't require, uh, every department of the government using propaganda to convince us against common sense. Okay? And if we find out that the government is implicated, then actually his legacy is going to be that a person who gave all of himself to helping people get elected, uh, all of himself to this political machine, was ultimately killed by it. And I think that, that matters to a lot of people, and I think it's obvious it matters to a lot of people, because it, what feels like a billiondollar campaign of propaganda against it doesn't seem to be working. There is something very big that we are very close to unpacking here, and the panic that we sense right now in deploying what feels to me to be a really nasty emotional tactic here, basically trying to say to people, "How, how dare you go against the grieving widow. How dare you go against David Hogg?" Right? And you're like, "Well, I don't know if David Hogg I know he's s- I, I'm very sad, uh, obviously that a school shooting happened. The Parkland shooting at high school should not happen, no child should have to live through that. But why does that mean David Hogg gets to go to Harvard?" Right? Does that, does that make sense? Like, does he belong at Harvard? And they go, "Oh, how dare Oh, my how, my how you evil, demonic s- person. Are you possessed? How could you ever question his authority and whether or not he's equipped to run the charity and speak on, you know, gun issues? He survived a school shooting." That's what they're doing right now. And I wanna also say that why I don't love these interviews, and I am, I say this with great deference to Erika, and in the beginning with some of these interviews I said, "Look, like, of course they're gonna wanna make sure they screen these questions. Like, she's going through a lot, like, she's transitioning, she's doing this, she's like that." I was like, "I wouldn't wanna be in her position." We're 3 months in now, okay, we are still getting rehearsed answers, and I feel like what is missing from all of this is, I don't know, like, passion, normal passion. Not this, like, ChatGBT feeling of, well, we all need to unite around the mission. It's like, no, I don't really care about Kash. I would just be, like, "What is the borough doing? What, has anybody traced this down?" Okay, I don't know if Candace is crazy but she says the French Foreign Legion was there. Has anybody chased this down? I texted her, I got this information, okay, it's wrong, that's a dead-end. Let me move over here, I've got files, I'm running I'm gonna run this investigation alongside you, Kash. And I don't know what he's doing. I want, like, one critique of the FBI, one critique of anything which the public is saying is worthy of critique. Like, it's almost like you're dressing down public perception. Like, people think that you can have enough money to just cut over people's gut instincts. It, that's what it is. It feels like we're so rich you don't have the right to think. Okay? We are rich enough to remove that, so stop thinking. The elites are here. It feels elite. That's why I hate this, it feels elite. It feels like the opposite of whatever Turning felt, Turning Point felt like when they were the underdogs, right? This entire presentation is elite. I'm on CBS stage with prepaid questions and Bari Weiss, and I obviously have rehearsed this answer because I got these questions ahead of time. I obviously know I'm gonna get asked this, so I'm gonna do, like I don't even like, and this is a fact, you can ask anybody who's ever interviewed me, I never ask for questions ahead of time. I don't wanna know, I don't wanna know the direction it's going into. I don't, I never give them anything, I never say, "We can't talk about this. That thing's off record." Because even getting questions ahead to me, preparing answers, feels fake and gay. Right? That just feels rehearsed, because it, it is. It has to be rehearsed because you got the questions ahead of time and at this stage I don't, I don't like it. I don't like it. I want something that feels au- anywhere where it feels authentic. Like, one question mark that you have. You're like, "Oh, I'd like him to be like, don't know about those text messages. think Tyler Robinson pulled the trigger. But those text messages are weird.'" It's just, "I trust my team. My team is amazing and my favorite date is April 24th because it's not too hot and it's not too cold and all you need is a light jacket." Like, it feels, it feels fake. It does. I'm sorry. And I am still interested in getting basic answers to our questions. I don't accept that that's somehow going to ruin the court case because that's a nonsense. It, you cannot logically explain to the public how letting us see Mikey McCoy's phone records, just one example, if that's really causing you so much grief. Here they are, here's who he called on that day and for how long. How would that implicate How, how would that frustrate your lawyer's efforts? How would the current court case and the jury pool be impacted if you answered about why these Egyptian planes, why it's a statistical anomaly for these Egyptian planes to be surrounding Turning Point USA faith events, you and Charlie this many times? What, how would that impact And, uh, again, I'm a gut player, it's co- uh, common sense, so forgive me for not being elite enough and educated enough and expert enough to understand how it would impact things. Explain it to me like I'm not a legal expert, you know. Like, I don't trust legal experts because I think they're all full of shit. Explain it to me that way. It's not tracking. It's not tracking and I am, I, I get it, it's me against the whole world. Actually, it's not, it's me against the elites. We've done this a lot of times, like I said, Ukraine, COVID. There's a, a formula here, there's a pattern here. If all of the mainstream apparatus and all of the influencers are pushing something and calling the other thing evil, we're probably about 2 years away from them all then apologizing, being like, "I just got it wrong. I shouldn't have told you to get the vaccine. I should" Like, it's a pattern that I've noticed, so I'm gonna stick with saying that what happened on September 10th, we are not getting the truth about. So there you have it. I'm not saying who is right overall, but on this point I think it's game, set and match to Candace.
Like
Comment
Share
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
5 d

Why Do We Sometimes Write Titles With Asterisks In The W*rds Like Th*s?
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

Why Do We Sometimes Write Titles With Asterisks In The W*rds Like Th*s?

Have you wondered why we sometimes put asterisks in the words in our headlines? Like this: President Trump Speaks Out On 1 Year Anniversary of Ass*ss*nation Attempt: “God had something to do with it!” And this: UPDATE: Firefighters K*lled In Idaho Sh**ting Identified Why are we doing that? Is it because we've gone WOKE? Gone soft? Are we embracing the censorship regime? That's what some of you have told me in (quite frankly very irrational and angry) emails you've sent me! Like this one from William (last name and email redacted for privacy purposes): William is BIG MAD at me for using asterisks! William is a "big boy" and he doesn't need my censorship!  And he's unsubscribing from my "pannsie" site!   I think it's "pansy" by the way William, but whatever. So....is that what we're doing? Did we cave to the woke mob and are we trying to censor the news from people like William who are big boys and can handle reading the full uncensored headline? Well, if you believe that then you haven't been around here very long or you don't know anything about my history here or my character. That's not what we do. That's not who we are. So....back to the main question: Why are we doing this? Its probably for a strategic reason, wouldn't you assume? And to be fair, I'm sure most of you do assume that because for every one "William" who sends me a childish and immature email like this, there are probably one million of you who get it.  So perhaps I'm preaching to the choir. But I wanted to actually address it and give you the answer for why we do this. And the answer is simple....because there IS a censorship brigade out there, but it's not me censoring things from you.  It's Big Tech censoring ME from ever reaching you! You see, once we publish and article, it goes a million different places. It gets shared all over social media -- Facebook, X, Telegram, TruthSocial. It also gets blasted out to our email Newsletter which so many of you subscribe to (JOIN HERE FOR FREE). And what happens in all of that is places like Facebook and the email companies have HUGE censorship technology that constantly scans for certain words and then deletes you if you use them. The list is long, but words like killing or assassination or bombing or knife or gun or hundreds of other words can INSTANTLY get you banned. All of a sudden, Mark Zuckerberg decides he knows what you should be allowed to see better than you do, so if the headline of our article includes a banned word and you try to post it on Facebook the post could be shadowbanned, or deleted or sometimes even the person trying to share it will get sent to Facebook Jail. Same for email...if an article has a banned word in the headline and we include it in our email Newsletter, companies like Gmail and YahooMail and AOL and all the way down the line will determine that they know better than you what you should be reading and they'll send that email into your Spam folder, or they'll just outright delete it and never allow it to come into your Inbox. That's all very real. And it's getting worse. So I have a choice, and it's kind of like the choice Thomas Massie has in Congress... I can choose to be ULTRA PRINCIPLED and use the banned words in my headlines with no edits and I'll be SO PRINCIPLED and I'll have taken a stand and people like "big boy" William will be so happy!  Because we didn't cave to the woke mob!  That's the Massie approach.  Principled and you win the battle but lose the war. Or...I can take the Trumpian approach which is to play their game with their rules and beat them at their own game, so that maybe I lose the war and I get an angry email from "big boy" William, but at the end of the day my email Newsletter makes it into your email Inbox and you get to read all the news from that day. Which one of those two scenarios has the most winning? I think you know where I stand. Thank you for your attention to this matter. -Noah
Like
Comment
Share
The People's Voice Feed
The People's Voice Feed
5 d

Favicon 
thepeoplesvoice.tv

Netanyahu Demands FBI Arrest Critics of Israel or There Will Be “Bloodshed Across America” 

Benjamin Netanyahu has crossed the line — openly threatening to assassinate critics of Israel right here on American soil. This isn’t hyperbole. It’s the escalation we’ve been warning about. Charlie Kirk wasn’t just silenced—he was [...] The post Netanyahu Demands FBI Arrest Critics of Israel or There Will Be “Bloodshed Across America”  appeared first on The People's Voice.
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
5 d ·Youtube History

YouTube
The Last Radio Transmissions Before Amelia Earhart's Mysterious Disappearance
Like
Comment
Share
Front Page Mag Feed
Front Page Mag Feed
5 d

Geert Wilders Speaking in Beverly Hills on January 10, 2026!
Favicon 
www.frontpagemag.com

Geert Wilders Speaking in Beverly Hills on January 10, 2026!

American Freedom Alliance invites you to an amazing dinner! The post Geert Wilders Speaking in Beverly Hills on January 10, 2026! appeared first on Frontpage Mag.
Like
Comment
Share
Front Page Mag Feed
Front Page Mag Feed
5 d

Why Brussels Put Up a Faceless Nativity Scene
Favicon 
www.frontpagemag.com

Why Brussels Put Up a Faceless Nativity Scene

And why everything went wrong. The post Why Brussels Put Up a Faceless Nativity Scene appeared first on Frontpage Mag.
Like
Comment
Share
Front Page Mag Feed
Front Page Mag Feed
5 d

Glazov Gang: Ex-Muslim FBI Informant on ‘America’s National Security Illusions’
Favicon 
www.frontpagemag.com

Glazov Gang: Ex-Muslim FBI Informant on ‘America’s National Security Illusions’

Hedieh Mirahmadi exposes the suicidal willful blindness that rules in Washington. The post Glazov Gang: Ex-Muslim FBI Informant on ‘America’s National Security Illusions’ appeared first on Frontpage Mag.
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 728 out of 103317
  • 724
  • 725
  • 726
  • 727
  • 728
  • 729
  • 730
  • 731
  • 732
  • 733
  • 734
  • 735
  • 736
  • 737
  • 738
  • 739
  • 740
  • 741
  • 742
  • 743
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund