Like most conservatives, I was disheartened by the warp speed break in the partnership of Elon Musk and Donald Trump, the two men who saved America. Trump by leading the movement to reclaim the nation’s destiny, Musk by freeing the movers’ speech from the veil of censorship and identifying government waste. For some time, both repelled the dark, violent forces that sought to stop them — Musk the torching of his revolutionary cars, Trump a bullet to the head. But unlike Trump, Musk couldn’t go the distance. The Mr. Hyde Virus infected him. He could have discreetly made his sound point about the flaws in the Big Beautiful Bill to the leader who’d welcomed and repeatedly celebrated him. Apart from the disruptive geopolitical consequences to the world, I had a selfish reason to lament the Trump-Musk severance — my screenwriting career. At the urging of a major producer friend, I wrote a seven-page treatment for a film about the SpaceX rescue of the two astronauts marooned on the International Space Station. Rocket Man is the sort of spectacular true story Hollywood once loved yet today will never touch. Not because of, but despite its most thrilling elements: a faulty spacecraft built by an DEI-ridden company (Boeing), mortal danger, Christian faith and heroism (astronaut Butch Wilmore’s), White House callousness, and patriotism. Hollywoke won’t make the movie for the same reason the Biden people left the astronauts stranded in space for nine months. My fictional Musk identifies the reason while confronting a Biden official. “Starliner’s stuck up there. I could have those two astronauts back on Earth by next month. Politics. That’s it, isn’t it? I just endorsed Trump. The White House can’t afford to let me be a hero — and by extension Trump.” Rocket Man was free money on the table just waiting for a smart investor to pick it up, and me along with it. Traditional and MAGA audiences would have made us both a success. Until Musk went nuts last week. He could have discreetly made his sound point about the flaws in the Big Beautiful Bill to the leader who’d welcomed and repeatedly celebrated him. Trump may even agree with Musk while dealing with political reality — a bare majority in Congress — over economic purity. Only that’s not how the Mr. Hyde Bug works. Musk went rabid, going so far as to call Trump an Epstein crimes participant. But Trump was right, and Musk was wrong, as the party that goes off the rails always is. Not Only Trump I was saddened but not surprised by Musk’s 180-degree turn, having experienced the same thing in my far less prominent life. Friends turning viciously against me. I’ve written here about my former Hollywood mates, with whom I’d shared laughs and groans, success and failure. How my support for Trump in 2015 made me a pariah even on their social media. But I was right, and they were wrong, and now they’re dead to the clueless DEI Girl Bosses they helped install. While I — other than the failure to launch of Rocket Man — am doing all right careerwise. The best aspect of the Mr. Hyde Bug is how fully it works in revealing the hidden vile persona. It did on Elon Musk last week — and ABC reporter Terry Moran late Saturday. As an ABC News senior national correspondent, Moran long played the old mainstream news game of trying to fool viewers into thinking he’s an unbiased reporter. But around midnight Saturday, the Mr. Hyde Moran exploded on X in an unhinged tweet about White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller. The thing about Stephen Miller is not that he is the brains behind Trumpism. Yes, he is one of the people who conceptualizes the impulses of the Trumpist movement and translates them into policy. But that’s not what’s interesting about Miller. It’s not brains. It’s bile. Miller is a man who is richly endowed with the capacity for hatred. He’s a world-class hater. You can see this just by looking at him because you can see that his hatreds are his spiritual nourishment. He eats his hate and so does his boss, who is also a world-class hater. But for Trump hatred is a means to his end: self-glorification. The Dr. Jekyll Moran reemerged to delete the devastating — to the author and his employer, not Stephen Miller — tweet. ABC News had recently been forced to pay Trump $16 million in a defamation lawsuit. But it was too late for Moran, who was instantly suspended. An ABC News spokesperson issued a mockable statement: “ABC News stands for objectivity and impartiality in its news coverage (cue laugh track) and does not condone subjective personal attacks on others. The post does not reflect the views of ABC News and violated our standards. As a result, Terry Moran has been suspended pending further evaluation.” I had one more encounter with the Mr. Hyde Bug last week on X, in my area of expertise, the narrative arts. A movie critic I’d been friendly with for years, let’s call him Mr. Moto, posted a gushing review of the new action film, From the World of John Wick: Ballerina, starring the gorgeous Ana de Armas.  I responded, “It’s another chick beating up men like ‘trans’ boxers are doing to top women. Waste of Ana. I’m out.” Moto’s response: “You shouldn’t make assumptions moron.” Somehow, he’d gone straight into personal insult territory, with someone whose opinions he’d recently valued. Recognizing the signs, I knew where this would end, but I had to see it through, posting, “She doesn’t beat up men in unarmed combat?” Instead of answering, Moto babbled the obvious point about not judging without seeing, getting increasingly hostile. Finally, he admitted Ana’s fighting prowess was built into the plot. When I ribbed Ballerina as the Citizen Kane of girl beating up men movies, Moto called me a f___ing moron and blocked me. I saw Moto’s post predicting a $40-million number one opening weekend, but I knew From the World of John Wick: Ballerina would be a dud like Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga, despite a desperate cameo by Keanu Reeves as John Wick. I was right and Moto was wrong. The $90-million Ballerina limped to a $25-million opening, coming a distant second to Lilo & Stitch in its third week. Hollywoke can’t force guys to watch a female action lead they’d rather make love to than thrash. But I have a great true story they would love to see. READ MORE from Lou Aguilar: Revenge of the Real Men This Memorial Day, New Respect for the Military The post Trump Encounters the Mr. Hyde Virus … And So Did I appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.

There are not many air raids or even battles that have a strategic effect. The Ukrainian strike on Russian air bases, some thousands of miles from Ukraine, may have been one. The Russian raid on Kyiv was a paltry response but everyone must assume that Russia is not done retaliating, far less done with the war. NATO’s concern is that if Putin is allowed to conquer Ukraine he will attack one or more of the NATO members. That concern is entirely valid. The June 1 Ukrainian attack was ingenious and daring. It hit four Russian airbases. Two were within usual range of Ukrainian attack forces but two — Olenya and Belaya — were respectively 1,000 miles and 3,000 miles from Kyiv. According to a Wall Street Journal report, Ukraine claimed to have damaged or destroyed 41 Russian combat aircraft worth about $7 billion with more than a hundred drones that cost about $2,000 each. Ukraine almost certainly exaggerated the extent of the damage their attack caused to Russian aircraft. Nevertheless, they have clearly damaged or destroyed many Tupolev Tu-95 “Bear” bombers, which are prominent in several Tom Clancy novels. The “Bears” are very old propeller-driven aircraft but have been effective in Ukraine. In addition, Ukraine reportedly damaged several Russian supersonic bombers, (roughly equivalent to our B-1s) and at least one Russian A-50 aircraft, which is roughly the same as our AWACS — Airborne Warning and Control aircraft — which direct air operations and warn of approaching enemy aircraft. According to a German assessment of the raid, the Ukrainian attack destroyed or crippled about 10 percent of Russia’s bomber fleet. Two days later the Ukrainians also attacked and partially destroyed the bridge between mainland Russia and the Crimean Peninsula over the Kerch Strait. Russia will be able to repair the bridge sooner than it will be able to replace the aircraft Ukraine destroyed. The raid, as described by Ukraine’s government and media, took18 months to plan. It was accomplished by smuggling trucks laden with drones (or drone parts) into Russia and then used in a coordinated attack on the bases which hosted the bombers. Those bombers had been used frequently by Russia to bomb and launch missiles against Ukraine. On June 5 Russia launched its response comprised of about 40 missiles and 400 drones. Targeting civilians intentionally (repeating their war crimes) Russians reportedly killed at least four people and injured about twenty in Kyiv and other areas of Ukraine. The Russians have also hit Kharkiv, in Ukraine’s northeast, with a very heavy attack. More retaliation is certain to follow. Russian President Putin can’t be happy about the results of these attacks. Russia lacks the facilities and manpower to replace the bombers Ukraine managed to destroy. The repairs to the Kerch bridge will take a short time (it’s already supposedly back in service) and won’t result in any inability of Russia to resupply its forces in Crimea. So where does Russia’s war against Ukraine go from here? Clearly, no peace agreement is possible at this point or at any time in the near future. Russia remains confident of victory or at least Putin does. But he has to have doubts about his ability to sustain the war which is now in its fourth year. A few heads will be lopped off — or some generals sent to the Gulag — but Putin’s determination to conquer Ukraine remains. As this column has often written, Putin has said that the fall of the Soviet empire was the greatest tragedy of the twentieth century and his ideological guide — Alexander Dugin — has written that unless Ukraine is conquered, Putin may as well not bother with the rest. The Russian war on Ukraine will go on as long as Putin is alive. At the age of 72 Putin is still able to conduct the war but not to his satisfaction. He has already survived the not-quite-coup against him by Yevgeny Proghozin, leader of the Wagner Group of mercenaries who were fighting in Ukraine. They may have returned to the battlefield. It is easy to say that Ukraine is Europe’s problem and they should have to deal with it. But it may all come down to whether the U.S. will continue to supply arms and other materiel to Ukraine. The Ukrainian forces are reportedly going to run out of missiles and other air defense weapons in July. President Trump has never made it clear whether he will continue to supply Ukraine’s needs. Vice President Vance, while he was in the senate, was the strongest opponent of any further aid to Ukraine. The question remains open amid the Hamas war on Israel, the fuss over Elon Musk, Trump’s concerns over his “One Big Beautiful Bill,” his so far unsuccessful negotiations with Iran, and the budget reconciliation on which Trump’s agenda depends. The president isn’t likely to have Ukraine on the top of his concerns. The NATO nations, which for the most part, are indistinguishable from the members of the European Union, cannot and certainly will not continue to meet Ukraine’s needs. But NATO’s concern is that if Putin is allowed to conquer Ukraine he will attack one or more of the NATO members. That concern is entirely valid. The Russian people, aside from Putin’s inner circle, have no voice in the continuation of the war. But if Trump abandons Ukraine, Putin will have a huge victory that will embolden him to attack NATO. That cannot be allowed to happen. U.S. troops should never be sent to fight for Ukraine. Nevertheless, we can’t stop supplying them with the tools of war they need. And let’s not forget the problem the Ukraine raid presents for every Western nation. Their vulnerability to smuggled drone strikes may not be as great as Russia’s but it is there. It’s another urgent problem that Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth need to deal with. READ MORE from Jed Babbin: Israel Back to War Mr. Trump’s Threats Hurt US Credibility The post Ukraine’s Drone Attack on Russian Bases appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.

Over two years ago, the nation’s top law enforcement agency landed in hot water when a memo leaked detailing plans to infiltrate and illegally spy on certain Catholic parishes and classifying American Catholics devoted to the Tridentine Mass as “Radical-Traditionalist Catholics” and “Racially or Ethnically Motivated Violent Extremists.” The memo, drafted and approved by the FBI’s Richmond field office, caused outrage and initiated a series of congressional hearings, during which then-FBI director Christopher Wray attested, under oath, that the Richmond field office had acted alone in drafting the memo, which was never circulated or meant to be circulated to the FBI more broadly. Wray lied. In at least one instance, an FBI agent actually went undercover and infiltrated a Catholic parish, and other agents interrogated sacristans and organists. In a letter to current FBI director Kash Patel, Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and the Senate Judiciary Committee requested further documents related to the FBI’s targeting of American Catholics, in addition to revealing that the agency’s anti-Catholic animus spread far beyond the Richmond office. Grassley wrote that, contrary to Wray’s testimony, the anti-Catholic memo “had been widely distributed to FBI field offices across the country.” In fact, the memo reportedly reached at least 1,000 FBI employees in multiple field offices across the country. Grassley noted that the Richmond memo served as the basis for a much broader-reaching second intelligence product being drafted when the initial memo was leaked. “Director Wray’s testimony was inaccurate not only because it failed to reveal the scope of the memo’s production and dissemination, but also because it failed to reveal the existence of a second, draft product on the same topic intended for external distribution to the whole FBI,” the senator wrote. He said that the second draft “was clearly a separate product, since it involved a different planned distribution to the whole Bureau, and a different chain of review, through the Counterterrorism Division.” Furthermore, other FBI field offices prepared to act on the contents of the memo and likely “placed [Catholic] groups in their areas of responsibility under suspicion based on reporting from the deeply-biased sources used in the memo.” The FBI’s field office in Buffalo, New York, for example, identified two Catholic groups labeled “Radical-Traditionalist Catholics” and possible “Racially or Ethnically Motivated Violent Extremists” within its jurisdiction. Once the anti-Catholic Richmond memo was leaked to the public, Grassley found, the FBI hastily tried to gather internal information to get ahead of the impending P.R. nightmare and found at least “13 documents and 5 attachments” which used such biased terminology as “radical traditionalist Catholic.” When Grassley and other senators grilled Wray in 2023 over the anti-Catholic memo, the then-director pledged that the FBI was currently investigating how the memo came into being and who thought it was a good idea to target American Catholics. He refused to provide further information to Congress because the investigation was still “ongoing.” But according to Grassley, the FBI had concluded its internal investigation in April of 2023, several days before Wray testified before the Senate. Months later, testifying before the House Judiciary Committee in July, Wray continued to claim that the internal review was still “ongoing.” The FBI began hurriedly deleting documents related to the anti-Catholic memo and its production once the memo itself was leaked. In fact, according to Grassley, then-FBI deputy director Paul Abbate ordered the memo and related documents to be deleted the very day that the memo became public. “This led to the reported permanent loss of records related to the production of the memo. While the FBI last year told my staff they believed they could recover deleted files, no such files were ever produced,” Grassley wrote. The veteran senator affirmed that he will “continue to investigate [the] Richmond memo and the culture at the FBI that allowed it to be produced and approved.” Of course, it became fairly obvious fairly quickly, back in 2023, that Wray and his cohorts were fibbing. The scope of Grassley’s subsequent findings over the past two years, however, are alarming, to say the least. This was not, as Wray swore under oath, a “single product by a single field office,” but appears to have been rather a symptom of a far more pervasive ideological animus infecting the FBI at nearly all levels. Multiple field offices — in Virginia, Wisconsin, and Oregon, at the very least — collaborated on the anti-Catholic memo. In at least one instance, an FBI agent actually went undercover and infiltrated a Catholic parish, and other agents interrogated sacristans and organists. Yet the FBI referenced “radical traditionalist Catholics” in over a dozen other documents and was actively preparing a second document to coordinate an agency-wide effort to target American Catholics as terrorist threats. The “radical traditionalist Catholic” terminology was borrowed directly from the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), a far-left hatemongering group that places American Catholics in the same category as neo-Nazis, White Supremacist Skinheads, and the Ku Klux Klan. Other contributors to the anti-Catholic animus included the anti-Catholic magazines The Atlantic and Salon. Over two years after the anti-Catholic Richmond memo became public, several startling questions remain: How often does the FBI rely on anti-Catholic sources and biased misinformation? How pervasive is anti-Catholicism in the FBI? How many times has the FBI targeted American Catholics in the past and subsequently lied about it? How close was the FBI to doing that again in 2023? Hopefully, with President Donald Trump now in office, Grassley and others may actually find some answers to these questions. The post Christopher Wray Lied: The FBI Was Targeting American Catholics appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.

Former White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre will release a book titled Independent: A Look Inside a Broken White House, Outside the Party Lines on Oct. 21, detailing her time in the Biden White House. The American Spectator has obtained an exclusive excerpt. “You’re gonna make history, kid,” President Biden told me on May 16, 2022, when I became the first African-American immigrant lesbian with curly hair to serve as White House press secretary. “Thank you, Mr. President. I am a truly historic figure. Just ask me,” I modestly replied. “I knew you would make a great vice president when I picked you based on merit and not race or gender.” “I’m not Kamala Harris,” I told a president who was on top of his intellectual and physical game. “I also enjoy your CNN show, but why do you wear a suit and have a lower voice and shorter hair from 10 p.m. to midnight?” he said. “I’m not Don Lemon, either,” I replied. Unable to keep up with him running mental rings around me, I knew we had to get down to the day’s business. “Mr. President. We have a jam-packed schedule,” I said. “I have a Vogue photo shoot at noon, a Vanity Fair sit-down at 1 p.m., and The New York Times wants to interview me about my history-making debut at 2 p.m.” “Can I go with you?” “No, Mr. President. You have a schedule to keep, too. The Columbo marathon starts at 9 a.m. on TBS, and your morning tapioca pudding cup arrives at 10 a.m. (CNN personality) Jake Tapper gives you a sponge bath at 11 a.m. You nap from noon to 6 p.m., and then it’s bedtime.” “Oh.” The president stared out of the Oval Office, steeped in reflection, or at least he would have been had a window existed before him and not a bare spot on the wall. “Anyway.” “Mr. President, my publicist, Gilda Squire, will escort you to a safe place where you won’t have to say or do anything.” I gave my boss a helpful nudge so he could shuffle off with Gilda, and I could go about my day battling misinformation and speaking truth to the nation based on whatever it said in my binder. A press secretary’s job is to convince the American people that they don’t see what is clearly in front of their faces. Take the millions of migrants who strolled across the southern border during the Biden-Harris administration. “We agree that the border is secure, but there is still more work to be done,” I said at the time. Videos of migrant caravans swamping the Texas border? Cheap fakes. (I can’t believe the media bought our cheap fake narrative. Actually, I can.) Following the president’s June 27, 2024, presidential debate hiccup, I blamed, in part, jet lag for his poor performance, even though the plane had landed a week earlier. “He’s as sharp as ever,” I told Real Clear Politics reporter Philip Wegmann in response to his ridiculous question about the president slowing down. Everyone knew that behind closed doors, President Biden balanced spinning plates on a stick on his nose while riding a unicycle around the Resolute Desk. I could barely keep up with him! Press secretaries must have a solid grip on the facts, and I demonstrated this when a suspected Chinese spy balloon drifted over North America in early 2023. Impartial journalist Jonathan Capehart asked me why a U.S. fighter jet shot it down over our neighbors to the north. “Because it’s part of, uh, NORAD,” I replied. “There’s — uh — the NORAD is part of like a — part of — It’s a, it’s a, what you call a coalition — a consortium. A pact.… We did it clearly in step with Canadia.” Such brilliance can inform the public and potentially land you a job on The View, where I would be the most intelligent panelist should ABC hire me when my star shines bright enough. And for the record, I disagree with those who say being the smartest co-host on The View is like being the hunchback with the best posture. Naturally, my historic success drew some detractors, including former Biden official Tim Wu, who posted (and later deleted) on X: “From WH policy staff perspective, the real problem with Karine Jean-Pierre was that she was kinda dumb. No interest in understanding harder topics. Just gave random, incoherent answers on policy.” Hatred of marginalized groups leads people to say hurtful things, including one former Biden official telling Politico, “Everyone thinks this is a grift,” regarding this book serving as a shameless cash grab by an unqualified, self-promoting political hack. I’m an Independent now, there’s nothing political or egotistical about me. And if you believe that, I’ve got a book to sell you. READ MORE from Matt Manochio: Goldberg Wasn’t the Only Outsider on That Message Chain Test Your Knowledge of Government Efficiency The post Karine Jean-Pierre: A Day With the President appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.

There’s something poetic perhaps even prophetic about watching the Trump–Musk bromance go up in flames. For those of us paying close attention, this fracture wasn’t a surprise. It was a slow-motion collision between two titans who were never built to coexist. I predicted this moment in a previous piece months ago: when ego meets ego, when populist power collides with techno-utopian ambition, sparks are bound to fly and one of them will get burned. It’s not just about Trump vs. Musk. It’s about populism vs. technocracy. Nationalism vs. globalism. Faith and family vs. algorithms and avatars. Now it’s happening. The very public fallout between Donald Trump, the 47th President of the United States, and Elon Musk, the self-proclaimed free-speech absolutist, is dominating headlines. But what the mainstream media won’t admit, and what conservatives must now recognize, is that this isn’t just a personal feud. It’s a defining fracture in the coalition of power, wealth, and influence that shaped the modern right. And it matters. Deeply. It started with flirtation. Trump praised Musk’s entrepreneurial brilliance, while Musk applauded Trump’s deregulatory approach and First Amendment bluster. In a political landscape craving disruptors, both men styled themselves as alpha outsiders: Trump, the blue-collar billionaire; Musk, the digital-age messiah. They dined together at Mar-a-Lago. Musk publicly considered voting Republican. Trump even mused about bringing Musk into a second-term administration. But underneath the bromantic tweets and photo ops, deep ideological fault lines were forming. Elon Musk doesn’t like to be controlled. Neither does Donald Trump. And there is only room for one gravitational center in the right-wing galaxy. The unraveling began subtly. Musk reinstated Trump’s Twitter account, only for Trump to ghost the platform in favor of his own Truth Social. Then came subtle jabs: Musk praising Ron DeSantis during the primaries, Trump mocking Musk as a “bull artist.” But now the gloves are off. In his latest Truth Social posts, Trump accused Musk of being “disloyal,” “overrated,” and “desperate for relevance.” Musk, for his part, has begun cozying up to Trump critics and making thinly veiled digs about “old men who won’t let go of power.” Let’s be clear: this was always inevitable. Musk’s vision of world libertarian tech dominance powered by AI, Mars colonies, and robotaxis is fundamentally incompatible with Trump’s America First populism. Musk wants to sell electric cars to the Chinese Communist Party. Trump wants tariffs. Musk wants to be seen as above politics. Trump is politics incarnate. Musk profits from globalism. Trump wages war against it. But the real split came over control of the cultural narrative. Musk wants to be the symbol of digital freedom. That’s why he bought Twitter and rebranded it as X. But Trump already owns the “free speech warrior” crown among the base. Musk’s attempt to edge him out of that spotlight was always going to fail and Trump doesn’t take betrayal lightly. What does this mean for conservatives? First, conservatives must realize that their movement cannot be outsourced to billionaires. Neither Musk nor Trump built their wealth serving the working class. Both are media manipulators. Both shape-shift to suit their interests. But only one has consistently stood by the forgotten men and women of America: factory workers, coal miners, truck drivers, veterans, those who get nothing from the electric future Musk is building. Second, this feud reveals a deeper civil war within conservatism. It’s not just about Trump vs. Musk. It’s about populism vs. technocracy. Nationalism vs. globalism. Faith and family vs. algorithms and avatars. The right must decide: do we want a country rooted in community, history, and sovereignty? Or a transhumanist playground for tech elites who build rockets while America burns? Why Trump Survives This Clash For all his faults, Trump’s compass points toward real people. He talks like them. He fights like them. Musk, by contrast, speaks in riddles and retreats into labs when things get hard. He champions “free speech,” but when X becomes unprofitable, he’ll sell it to the highest bidder, censorship be damned. Let the record show: Trump will survive this feud. Musk, despite his legions of simps online, may not. Because movements aren’t built in space they’re built on dirt. On faith. On sacrifice. On the blood and sweat of patriots who don’t care how many Teslas you’ve sold or whether you’re verified on X. This feud is not a distraction. It’s a revelation. It shows us who’s truly in the fight and who just wants to be adored by all. There’s no room for fence-sitters in 2025. Not with open borders, weaponized justice, and war at our doorstep. So let the feud continue. Let Musk tweet. Let Trump roar. In the end, we’ll find out whose voice actually moves the people. Spoiler: it won’t be Elon Musk’s. READ MORE: Extremism on the Left Has Institutional Support No, Elon, Americans Elected Trump — Not You Joshua Chronicles is a political analyst and cultural commentator whose work explores the intersection of faith, governance, and public discourse.  The post Trump-Musk: Why This Feud Was in the Cards appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.

The British Labour government is facing backlash after nearly 1,200 migrants crossed the English Channel in a single day, prompting ministers to propose linking immigration enforcement to a new digital ID system […] The post Mass immigration is being used to roll out the Globalists’ agenda, including digital IDs first appeared on The Expose.

The Academy Awards are considered the highest honor in the film industry, a symbol of recognition for artistic excellence and unforgettable performances. Each year, actors dream of clutching the coveted golden statuette, hoping to etch their names in cinematic history. Yet, shockingly, some of the most legendary and beloved actors have never won an Oscar ...

A band of desperate religious refugees find themselves blown hopelessly off course, only to be deposited at the one spot on a wild continent best suited for their survival. George Washington’s beaten army, surrounded by a ruthless foe and on the verge of annihilation, manages an impossible escape due to a freakish change in the weather. Continue Reading...

Los Angeles ICE protesters trap police officers under a bridge by throwing rocks and bricks down on them when they try and get back to their police vehicles Officer tries to get to his vehicle and gets hit with a rock and seriously injured The rioters all cheer and cuss at them pic.twitter.com/oCJ12pBjox — Wall […]

from RT: The US president said he “didn’t like” Kiev’s escalatory attacks on Russia’s nuclear triad The recent Ukrainian drone attacks on long-range nuclear-capable Russian bombers have sharply increased the risk of escalation and given Moscow a valid reason to retaliate with force, US President Donald Trump told reporters on Friday. In addition to launching […]