I received the following letter in the Sentinel email and thought you might be interested in it. Mr. Rivera‚ a Marine‚ was sentenced to eight months in prison for what looks like speech crimes and for walking around the capital taking pictures. The DOJ said he joined a crowd that surged police. I don’t know […] The post J6er Is Suing the DOJ Over False Arrest &; Imprisonment appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

Almost three years after the January 6‚ 2021 protest‚ the Blaze reporter Steve Baker was notified that he would be charged for something he did on J6. He doesn’t know the charges yet. His lawyer told him the FBI notified him that Mr. Baker had to turn himself in on Tuesday. BREAKING My attorney has […] The post Blaze Reporter to Be Arrested on Tuesday for J6 Reporting appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

According to the polls‚ the number one concern of Americans is the economy. Joe Biden continues to brag about Bidenomics. Overall inflation under Joe Biden and his Bidenomics is at 17.2%. Real wages have declined by 3%. Biden falsely claimed wages have gone up while inflation has gone down 65%. Economist Larry Kulow reported on […] The post Biden Says Bidenomics Is to Give Us a Little Breathing Room appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

Ian Sams‚ White House Spokesman for Oversight and Investigations‚ got into a brief spat with CNN’s Phil Mattingly during a Thursday broadcast of “CNN This Morning‚” accusing the anchor of pushing the same “talking points” he had heard from Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH). Sams voiced his objection to the way Mattingly framed his initial question — which was a side-by-side comparison of direct quotes from President Joe Biden during the 2020 campaign‚ the White House‚ and the president’s embattled son Hunter Biden — regarding House Republicans’ investigation into the Biden family’s alleged foreign business dealings. WATCH: CNN's Phil Mattingly: "It was said explicitly the president did not talk to his son about business dealings! That is very clearly NOT the case … it is a FACT that the president said one thing that ended up being not true!" Biden spokesman Ian Sams: "I dispute that that's true" pic.twitter.com/TWmflWiW55 — RNC Research (@RNCResearch) December 14‚ 2023 Mattingly referenced Hunter Biden’s Wednesday press conference — which he gave outside the Senate side of the Capitol complex while actively defying a subpoena from the House — and noted that the statement he gave had been an “evolution” from past statements. “In the statement that Hunter Biden made yesterday said‚ ‘Let me say it as clearly as I can. My father was not financially involved in my business‚'” Mattingly began. “He was unequivocal about that. But that is an evolution of where the president had been during the campaign‚ where the White House had been at the start of the administration. Not involved financially in the business is very different than never talked about the business‚ not been involved in the business at all. Was that an intentional point of clarity‚ do you think?” “I actually dispute the whole premise of that question‚” Sams objected. “Why?” Mattingly asked. “It’s one of Jim Jordan’s favorite little shiny objects is to try to take a semantic thing and make an argument that is‚ that is somehow far afield from what they’re actually focused on‚” Sams continued. “We’ve been extremely clear over and over again for years‚ and nothing has changed. The president was not in business with his son‚ period. They’re trying to make up all sorts of allegations and make up lies about him doing things that were wrong and –” Mattingly interrupted then‚ saying‚ “Ian‚ with respect. I’m not citing Jim Jordan here. I was in some of the White House press briefings where it was said explicitly the president did not talk to his son about business dealings – that is very clearly not the case. ” CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP The anchor went on to say that it was also clear that the White House had finessed the statement over time – and while that may not amount to “an impeachable offense” in itself‚ “it is a fact that the president said one thing that ended up being not true.” “Again. I dispute that. That’s that. That’s true. That is not true!” Sams insisted. “The truth is that he wasn’t in business with his son. The Republicans have been for years trying to make arguments that he was somehow wrapped up in all of this —” “I’m not saying that he was in business with his son‚” Mattingly repeated. “– over and over again. Those have been refuted‚” Sams continued. “And so what they do is they try to take semantic games and try to distract from the actual truth‚ which is that all of these things have been debunked. These allegations are false‚ and they’re using their power in Congress to launch this impeachment inquiry over false allegations that have no basis in reality.” The House voted this week — along party lines — to continue an official impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden.

House investigators may have received a new line of inquiry in their newly-authorized impeachment probe after President Joe Biden‘s son Hunter Biden defied a subpoena for a deposition‚ according to George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley. In an op-ed published by The Messenger on Thursday‚ Turley suggested that contact between father and son about Hunter Biden holding a press conference on Wednesday outside the U.S. Capitol before the younger Biden refused to show up for a scheduled deposition could be grounds for obstruction. White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters that President Biden was “familiar” with what Hunter Biden was going to say at his press conference — during which the first son stated that he would appear for a public hearing‚ but not the deposition. Jean-Pierre declined to offer any more details when pressed on whether the commander in chief tried to talk his son out of violating a congressional subpoena. With impeachment investigators now saying Hunter Biden will face contempt of Congress proceedings for defying the subpoena‚ Turley wrote that Jean-Pierre’s remark “suggests that the president spoke with his son before his act of contempt and discussed his statement.” Turley argued this could be a “breathtaking mistake” for the Bidens. “One of the four most obvious potential articles of impeachment that I laid out in my prior testimony was obstruction. There already are questions over special treatment potentially being given to Hunter in the form of alleged felonies being allowed to expire‚ warnings about planned federal raids‚ and sweetheart deals‚” Turley wrote‚ referring to a separate criminal investigation into Hunter Biden run by the Department of Justice — a probe that is being looked at as part of the impeachment inquiry. “In addition‚ President Biden has enlisted White House staff to actively push challenged accounts of his conduct and attack the House Republicans’ investigative process. Such acts could legally bootstrap prior misconduct into his presidency under abuse-of-power allegations‚” he added. “If this latest allegation is true‚ the president was speaking with his son about committing a potentially criminal act of contempt‚” Turley continued. “Hunter was refusing to give testimony focused not on his own role but on his father’s potential role in the alleged influence peddling. The House can pursue evidence on that conversation and how the president may have supported his son’s effort.” CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP Much of the rest of the op-ed from Turley‚ who gave testimony in the impeachment probe earlier this year‚ made a case for how Hunter Biden may have “opened a new potential front for prosecution” for resisting a subpoena with his “bizarre public display.”