A manager for the parent company of Pornhub admitted that pornography is unhealthy‚ addictive‚ and destructive in a newly released undercover video. Mike Farley‚ a Senior Product Manager at Aylo‚ the parent company of Pornhub formerly called Mindgeek‚ made the admissions in undercover video captured by Sound Investigations‚ noting that the porn website has 180 million unique visitors every day. “I definitely think porn addiction is definitely a thing‚ that’s for sure‚” Farley said in the footage. “I don’t think it’s a positive thing in general.” “Liberating?” he questioned before saying‚ “I don’t know‚ I think it’s just the easy way out. To me it doesn’t seem like something that would be good … I don’t think anybody watches porn and then feels good about themselves after.” Farley said that the company doesn’t “really know the implications of this sh*t‚” citing critiques made by psychologist Jordan Peterson‚ host of the Jordan Peterson Podcast on Dailywire+. NEW UNDERCOVER P*RNHUB VID P*rnhub Product Manager Says P*rn “Can’t Be Normal‚” “Can’t Be Healthy” Discusses P*rn Psychology From @jordanbpeterson‚ “We Don’t Really Know The Implications of This S**t” Admits P*rn Is Addictive to Retain 180MM Users/Day “I Hope They All Ban Us” pic.twitter.com/AyM9eMWIZA — Arden Young (@arden_young_) December 14‚ 2023 The video is the latest in a series released by Sound Investigations‚ which previously revealed that the embattled porn company attempts to introduce transgender pornographic content to straight men. It was first reported by the Washington Examiner. Farley‚ who has been employed by the company for over 10 years‚ also conceded that Pornhub is not concerned with ethics. “The government makes it about ethics‚” he said. “I don’t think [Pornhub]’s worried about ethics‚ it’s a f***ing adult website. It’s kind of the opposite of ethical.” The Aylo Senior Product Manager went on to say that the industry has a detrimental effect on men‚ pointing out that viewing pornography is unnatural. “Your brain thinks you’ve seen them in person‚ like‚ there’s no difference … There’s no way that’s normal. That can’t be normal. That can’t be healthy. That must do something because that’s significant‚” Farley stated. “Like‚ if you think of the human species‚ like‚ if you think of the thousands of years we’ve existed before‚ the average guy would have seen like how many girls naked?” Farley also admitted that watching pornography can damage relationships by setting “unrealistic expectations” and said that viewing it is akin to cheating. “I hope they all ban us … because I don’t give a sh*t‚” Farley added in a conversation about states and countries enacting ID requirements to prevent minors from accessing pornography. The company is currently being sued by 257 alleged victims across 10 human trafficking class action lawsuits. 

A federal prosecutor who allegedly placed constraints on the years-long investigation into Hunter Biden said she has parted ways with the Department of Justice (DOJ). The news emerged on Thursday as now-former Assistant U.S. Attorney Lesley Wolf of Delaware appeared for an interview with the House Judiciary Committee. In her opening statement‚ published by PunchBowl News‚ Wolf said she “left” the DOJ “a few short weeks ago” but claimed that she showed up to testify “voluntarily” because of her respect for the law. A source told Fox News that Wolf had planned to leave the DOJ for some time. The exact date and circumstances of the departure were not immediately clear and The Daily Wire reached out to the DOJ seeking further comment. Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) subpoenaed Wolf last month‚ seeking her testimony as the GOP-led House reviews how the DOJ has conducted its criminal probe into Hunter Biden and engages in a corruption-focused impeachment inquiry against his father‚ President Joe Biden. Jordan explained in a letter to Wolf the various ways in which information obtained by the judiciary panel indicated she was “responsible for many of the decisions to deviate from standard investigative protocol during the Department’s investigation of Hunter Biden.” These included claims that Wolf‚ either directly or by instructing others‚ blocked certain lines of inquiry about Joe Biden and tipped off Hunter Biden’s legal team about a planned search of a storage unit. Wolf said in her statement she was “significantly constrained” in what she could say by rules and regulations due to her now being a former DOJ employee‚ but she insisted‚ “At no time did politics play a role in or in any way impact my work as a federal prosecutor.” Wolf also generally talked about how there was “room for disagreement” when attorneys and investigators discussed prosecutorial decisions. Jordan told reporters after the interview that Wolf “refused to answer most of our questions‚” pinning it on “instructions she was given by the Justice Department.” In addition‚ testimony from Internal Revenue Service (IRS) whistleblower Gary Shapley alleged that Wolf “obstructed” another U.S. attorney’s team in Pennsylvania from briefing Delaware U.S. Attorney Davis Weiss’ office about bribery allegations concerning Joe and Hunter Biden‚ the letter said. Following the collapse of a plea deal and being given special counsel status by Attorney General Merrick Garland earlier this year‚ Weiss is now locked in a legal battle with Hunter Biden upon securing federal indictments on gun and tax charges against the first son. Still‚ GOP congressional investigators have pressed for evidence of obstruction in the years that led up to what they dubbed the “sweetheart” plea deal. Weiss testified in a deposition before the House Judiciary Committee last month‚ after which Jordan indicated “the key takeaway” was that the prosecutor requested but did not receive special attorney powers that would have allowed him to bring charges outside of his jurisdiction in Delaware last year without the partnership of the local U.S. attorney. CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP That would appear to affirm concerns‚ spurred by whistleblower testimony from Shapley and another IRS agent who also worked on the Hunter Biden case‚ that the DOJ slow-walked the inquiry in a way that may have precluded other serious charges due to the statute of limitations. But‚ according to a statement obtained by The Daily Wire‚ Weiss told the House Judiciary Committee that “processes” associated with investigative and charging decisions did not “interfere” with his authority. “At no time was I blocked‚ or otherwise prevented from pursuing charges or taking the steps necessary in the investigation by other United States Attorneys‚ the Tax Division or anyone else at the Department of Justice‚” he testified.

Yesterday‚ Hunter Biden announced he would be avoiding a subpoena by the House Oversight Committee. The Republicans on that committee wanted to ask Hunter about his business relationships with his father‚ Joe. Hunter is currently under indictment for nine charges related to tax evasion‚ all based on unreported income and spending from his lucrative years as his father’s alleged bagman.  Republicans voted last night to formally open an impeachment inquiry‚ which presumably gives them greater subpoena power. So yesterday‚ Hunter showed up in Washington D.C. to grandstand. He began by announcing that he was the real victim — a victim of Republican cruelty. Hunter Biden‚ according to his father‚ the media‚ and — wait for it — Hunter Biden himself‚ is a victim. In fact‚ he is the greatest victim. Were it not for his last name‚ he wouldn’t be prosecuted for gun charges and tax evasion. Were it not for his last name‚ he wouldn’t be dragged before Congress to talk about his business.  Of course‚ were it not for his last name‚ he would also likely be a homeless drug addict with no penny to his name‚ unpaid child support‚ and no life prospects at all. As Hunter once admitted‚ his last name was “gold” to foreign investors and his father’s job “opened doors that wouldn’t be opened up to other people.”  Hunter is not the only member of the Biden family who feels this way: Jim Biden‚ Joe’s brother‚ told potential business partners‚ “We’ve got people all around the world who want to invest in Joe Biden.” Frank‚ Joe’s other brother‚ called the Biden name a “tremendous asset” for business. Val‚ his sister‚ said‚ “I had a better seat at the table because my brother is at the head of the table.” Hunter Biden is not a victim. He’s anything but a victim. WATCH: The Ben Shapiro Show But according to Hunter — a man who tried to disown his own daughter‚ fathered while he was a drug-addled derelict‚ and who urged his father to do the same to his granddaughter‚ all while he spent nearly a million dollars on prostitutes and the like — the whole debacle surrounding him and his dad is a witch hunt. And he says Republicans have turned his dad’s love for him into darkness. But sometimes love can turn into darkness. Like‚ say‚ when your powerful father uses his power to clear millions of dollars for his family‚ using you as the family bagman‚ even knowing that giving you access to the family credit card allows you to fund your sex and drug addictions.  Putting aside the seamy personal situation of the Biden family‚ however‚ what we really have here is a cut and dried corruption case. Yesterday‚ Hunter claimed his father wasn’t financially involved in his business‚ saying he was not “financially involved.” That is some pretty careful wording‚ meaning‚ he didn’t sign checks on behalf of the business. Didn’t fund it himself. Wasn’t doing the 1040s. But what about whether Joe was involved at all in Hunter’s business.  Obviously‚ Joe was. He always has been. In reality‚ Hunter has never held a job unconnected to his father or his dad’s corruption. As a Delaware senator‚ Joe was very close with the vice president of MBNA‚ the biggest bank in Delaware. MBNA hired Hunter to a management training post. After he left MBNA‚ Hunter got a job with the Clinton Department of Commerce. Then‚ he went to work as a lobbyist for a former Biden campaign staffer named William Oldaker; during that time‚ MBNA paid him $100‚000 per year. MBNA‚ for what it’s worth‚ made bank while they pushed Hunter’s career. According to the American Spectator‚ it became the “second-largest issuer of Visa and Mastercards in the country‚ and some analysts believe it will eventually overtake Citicorp to become the nation’s biggest credit-card bank.”  How convenient! Hunter’s lobbying work earned him huge dollars. As per the New Yorker‚ “An informal arrangement was established: Biden wouldn’t ask Hunter about his lobbying clients‚ and Hunter wouldn’t tell his father about them. ‘It wasn’t like we all sat down and agreed on it. … It came naturally‚’” Hunter said.  Hunter has been clearing family money for years on the back of Joe’s position. As he texted his daughter in January 2019‚ “I hope you can all do what I did and pay for everything for this entire family for 30 years. It’s really hard. But don’t worry‚ unlike pop‚ I won’t make you give me half your salary.” In November 2013‚ Hunter joined with Chinese investors to create a company called Bohai Harvest RST Equity Investment Management Co.‚ Ltd.‚ or BHR for short. That investment fund was controlled by the Bank of China. The next month‚ Joe brought Hunter with him on Air Force 2 to Beijing‚ where they met the CEO of BHR‚ Jonathan Li. The business license in China was quickly approved‚ and Hunter joined the board. In May 2014‚ Burisma Holdings Limited‚ a Ukrainian natural gas and oil company‚ announced that Hunter Biden would join its board of directors. Joe Biden was overseeing Ukrainian policy for the White House at the time. In March 2015‚ Hunter organized a business dinner in Washington‚ D.C.; Joe stopped by to meet a high-level Burisma official‚ Vadym Pozharskyi.  In November later that year‚ Pozharskyi suggested that U.S. officials should visit Ukraine and talk with the Ukrainian Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin‚ as well as President Petro Poroshenko‚ about Shokin’s investigations into the CEO of Burisma‚ Mykola Zlochevsky. That same month‚ Amos Hochstein‚ the Special Envoy and Coordinator for International Energy Affairs in the Obama White House‚ met with Hunter to talk about Burisma. Five days later on November 11‚ Hochstein met with Joe in the West Wing; the next day‚ he called Hunter again. The next month‚ Joe hosted a party attended by both Hochstein and Hunter. In December 2015‚ Joe went to Ukraine‚ where he demanded that Shokin be fired‚ and threatened to withdraw $1 billion in International Monetary Fund (IMF) loans if he wasn’t. Two days later‚ Poroshenko acquiesced and committed to firing Shokin. During this time‚ a confidential human source later told the FBI‚ Burisma CFO Vadim Pojarski said that he had hired Hunter to “protect us‚ through his dad‚ from all kinds of problems.” A month or two later‚ the source said‚ Zlochevsky dismissed any threats from Shokin as easily solved‚ saying‚ “Don’t worry‚ Hunter will take care of all of those issues through his dad.” According to that confidential human source‚ Zlochevsky also said it cost $5 million “to pay one Biden” and $5 million to pay “another Biden.”  In February of 2016‚ Zlochevsky gave Hunter extravagant birthday gifts; then‚ a couple of weeks later‚ Shokin was fired‚ and Joe called Poroshenko to thank him.  During this time‚ Joe was apparently using a pseudonym‚ Robert L. Peters‚ to email his son‚ Hunter‚ with regard to Ukraine. Joe was also‚ according to Hunter’s business partner Devon Archer‚ routinely called into meetings on the phone so Hunter could exhibit ties with his father. Democrats have defended Joe by claiming he called only to talk about the weather — which is precisely what a racketeering head would do in order to demonstrate the viability of connection with power. That same month (December 2015)‚ Hunter and CEFC China Energy Company Limited Chairman Ye Jianming began communicating regarding a possible U.S. partnership. In January 2017‚ Ye gave Hunter a diamond worth $80‚000.  In March 2017‚ Ye’s company wired $3 million to Robinson Walker LLC‚ a company owned by a Biden associate‚ Rob Walker. Then‚ Joe attended a CEFC meeting at the Four Seasons in Los Angeles. In May 2017‚ Hunter’s business associates infamously emailed each other about creating a CEFC deal that would include “10 held by H for the big guy.” It’s worth noting that other documentation from a confidential human source also referred to Joe as the “big guy” in regards to Burisma. Former Hunter business partner Tony Bobulinski similarly says that the “big guy” referred to Joe. By July 2017‚ Hunter was writing to the head of a Chinese company in a WhatsApp message: I am sitting here with my father and we would like to understand why the commitment made has not been fulfilled. I am very concerned that the Chairman has either changed his mind and broken our deal without telling me or that he is unaware of the promises and assurances that have been made have not been kept. Tell the director that I would like to resolve this now before it gets out of hand. And now means tonight. And Z if I get a call or text from anyone involved in this other than you Zhang or the Chairman I will make certain that between the man sitting next to me and every person he knows and my ability to forever hold a grudge that you will regret not following my direction. All too often people mistake kindness for weakness – and all too often I am standing over top of them saying I warned you. From this moment until whenever he reaches me. […] Ok my friend – I am sitting here waiting for the call with my father. I sure hope whatever it is you are doing is very very very important. On August 2‚ 2017‚ Hunter wrote an email explaining that the chairman — presumably Ye Jianming — had now cut a “MUCH MORE LASTING AND LUCRATIVE ARRANGEMENT.” That arrangement was the creation of Hudson West III‚ LLC‚ an entity owned 50% by CEFC agent Gongwen Dong and 50% by Hunter. The next day‚ Hunter told Gongwen Dong via WhatsApp‚ “The Biden’s are the best I know at doing exactly what the Chairman wants from this partnership.” In January 2019‚ Hunter’s then-personal assistant Katie Dodge wrote an email to personal aide to Joe Biden‚ Richard Ruffner‚ saying Joe had elected to pay Hunter’s legal bills‚ amounting to hundreds of thousands of dollars‚ including legal fees for restructuring his JV with the Bank of China. We know all of this only because Hunter isn’t just a bagman for his dad. He is‚ as we should remember‚ a drug-addled derelict.  The story broke wide open in mid-October 2020‚ when Hunter’s laptop came into public view — since he‚ while high as a kite‚ had left his laptop in a repair shop in Delaware. It contained not just pictures and video of drug use and prostitution‚ but also the content of emails and WhatsApp messages. The whole Biden criminal corruption story was emerging just before the election. So Biden lied. And so did the media. On October 22‚ 2020‚ Biden lied in open debate. Joe said‚ “I have not taken a penny from any foreign source ever in my life. … My son has not made money‚ in terms of this thing about — what are you talking about? — China. The only guy who made money in China is [President Trump].” The American public never got the full story before the election. That was because the FBI vaguely warned America’s largest social media services that the laptop might be Russian disinformation. So the social media services actively shut down dissemination of the New York Post’s blockbuster story. Then hundreds of former pseudo-experts on intelligence signed a letter also attesting the laptop had the hallmarks of Russian disinformation. Then Joe’s campaign suggested the laptop was Russian disinformation too.  All this time‚ Hunter was under active criminal investigation by the FBI. He had been since 2019. That investigation covered two separate matters: Hunter’s years-long tax evasion‚ and his false attestation on a gun form that he was not a drug addict.  In 2023‚ U.S. Attorney David Weiss of Delaware — a man who had worked with Beau Biden and had long connections with all the power players in the state — announced a sweetheart deal with Hunter. Hunter would receive no jail time for the tax charges‚ and he would receive a diversion on the gun charge. The deal also included a cleverly-created proviso to immunize Hunter from all further investigation on his foreign dealings‚ including possible and obvious violations of the Foreign Agents Registration Act. That proviso was included in the diversion charge‚ not the tax charges.  This all blew up in public view when two IRS whistleblowers came forward to allege that the DOJ had acted to prevent the Hunter investigation from implicating Joe; not only that: They claimed that Joe Biden’s DOJ under Merrick Garland had hamstrung the investigation by refusing Weiss special counsel status and that the DOJ had implemented a sweetheart deal. The whistleblowers were right. According to the New York Times: Mr. Weiss appeared willing to forgo any prosecution of Mr. Biden at all‚ and his office came close to agreeing to end the investigation without requiring a guilty plea on any charges. But the correspondence reveals that his position‚ relayed through his staff‚ changed in the spring‚ around the time a pair of I.R.S. officials on the case accused the Justice Department of hamstringing the investigation. Mr. Weiss suddenly demanded that Mr. Biden plead guilty to committing tax offenses.  The deal finally blew up when the judge in Hunter’s case refused the plea deal‚ noting that it was completely unprecedented. To cover up the debacle‚ Merrick Garland then announced that Weiss would be appointed special counsel — suspiciously just in time to avoid testifying before Congress about the sweetheart deal. Now Weiss has charged Hunter on nine tax charges. He’s likely going to jail. But just remember: He’s not going to jail because he’s a victim. And there is no way in hell that Joe was ignorant of all of this. This is why the impeachment inquiry is gaining steam. Hunter says it’s all about politics‚ of course — and‚ as with any political act‚ politics are part of the game. But Hunter also says the impeachment inquiry itself is scurrilous and calls the inquiry “shameless.” No‚ the only shameless one here is the guy who sells $500‚000 finger paintings to his father’s donors‚ then refuses to pay child support‚ and insists any settlement involve denying his daughter the right to use the only actual asset the Biden family has: the Biden family name. Hunter should be hit with contempt. And he will be. The only question is how much more information will drip out that debunks every last argument Joe Biden has ever made about the innocence of his son — and his own ignorance.

Shortly after the 2018 midterms‚ Jerry Nadler — who was about to become the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee — boarded an Acela train from New York to Washington. When he got to his seat‚ he began loudly speaking on the phone with someone who remains unknown to this day. Unfortunately for Nadler‚ the editor-in-chief of the conservative website The Federalist‚ Mollie Hemingway‚ was seated nearby‚ jotting down notes about the whole conversation. Hemingway overheard Nadler outline‚ in no uncertain terms‚ Democrats’ plans for going‚ “all-in” on investigating and ultimately impeaching Donald Trump. It was much more important for Democrats to impeach Donald Trump than Brett Kavanaugh‚ Nadler said‚ because going after Kavanaugh might remind voters of Joe Biden’s disastrous handling of Anita Hill’s sexual harassment allegations against Clarence Thomas. That could harm Joe Biden’s chances of becoming president. So‚ Nadler said‚ the safe play was to impeach Donald Trump for colluding with Russia‚ which is an accusation that Jerry Nadler has never had any evidence to support. If Democrats went with that strategy‚ Nadler said on the phone‚ it would clear the way for a Joe Biden presidency. In one sense‚ what Mollie Hemingway overheard wasn’t surprising. More than a year earlier‚ just minutes after Donald Trump was inaugurated‚ The Washington Post announced‚ “The campaign to impeach President Trump has begun.” But in retrospect‚ Jerry Nadler’s remarks on that train back in 2018 didn’t just foreshadow Donald Trump’s two impeachments‚ or the presidency of Joe Biden. They also established the blueprint for how Leftists would treat all political investigations moving forward. They have no interest in the evidence. They don’t care about the law. Their goal‚ instead‚ is to use the force of the legal system to punish their enemies. This was a shift that was much bigger than Jerry Nadler. The same year that Nadler made those remarks on the Acela‚ Letitia James was campaigning to become New York’s attorney general. And she said pretty much the same thing. She promised to find some way to take Donald Trump to court‚ however implausible. Aand she followed through. WATCH: The Matt Walsh Show One of the many problems with this strategy is that it’s short-sighted. Democrats failed to ensure they’d hold onto political power forever. That’s certainly their goal. It’s the entire justification for their immigration policy. But they haven’t achieved it yet. So right now‚ Republicans are in control of the House of Representatives. And yesterday‚ they announced their own impeachment inquiry. They’re looking primarily at whether Joe Biden sold favors to overseas interests‚ particularly in Ukraine and China.  In a moment‚ I’ll go into some of the evidence that justifies this inquiry. But really‚ we don’t have to go into all of it. Once Jerry Nadler adopted the Stalinist standard for impeachment — basically‚ “show me a man and I’ll show you the crime” — then evidence became moot. Impeachment is all about raw political power now. It’s not about evidence. And it’s certainly not about fairness‚ or the rule of law. The White House and the Biden family know all of this. That’s why they’re not even pretending to defend themselves. Hunter Biden went in front of the cameras and announced he’s not going to comply with a congressional subpoena he was served. Watch: Hunter Biden refuses to comply with @JamesComer's subpoena to be deposed behind closed doors and demands a public hearing so he can tell sob stories on TV. Reminder that Don Jr. testified behind closed doors for over 40 hours about the Russia hoax. Hold him in contempt! pic.twitter.com/1FoJB06zyX — Greg Price (@greg_price11) December 13‚ 2023 Hunter Biden received a lawful subpoena for closed-door testimony. This is the same kind of subpoena Donald Trump Jr. and many other Trump aides were forced to comply with‚ for hours on end. But he just doesn’t want to do it‚ so he refuses. And his justification for refusing is completely absurd. There’s no legal basis for it‚ and Hunter Biden isn’t pretending there is one. Instead‚ he’s saying he wants to testify in front of the news media‚ instead of a closed-door session. It’s just his preference‚ and he seems to think that his preference is somehow binding on Congress. It was just a couple of years ago that former Trump adviser Steve Bannon defied a congressional subpoena. Unlike Hunter Biden‚ he had a reason for doing so. He argued it was unlawful for Congress to compel him to testify about his work in the White House‚ citing executive privilege.  Now‚ whatever you make of that defense‚ it’s clearly rooted in the law. It’s working its way through the federal appellate process as we speak. What happened to Steve Bannon because he asserted that defense? He was sentenced to four months in prison: Is that going to happen to Hunter Biden? As of now‚ congressional Republicans are threatening to hold him in contempt of Congress‚ which they obviously should. But then there’s the question of whether Joe Biden’s DOJ will pursue criminal charges. Will they throw Hunter Biden in prison for this? Will they demand he testify‚ under oath‚ about his father’s involvement in his business? That’s an open question. Right now‚ the DOJ is pursuing charges against Hunter Biden about his fraudulent gun form‚ and his tax evasion. But those charges don’t directly relate to the main issue in this impeachment inquiry‚ which is where Hunter Biden got all of his money from — and more importantly‚ Joe Biden’s involvement in procuring that money. Yesterday a reporter at Fox asked the White House press secretary about all of this. She proceeded to make it clear that Joe Biden knew that Hunter would defy the congressional subpoena. Beyond that‚ she just made light of the whole situation. Watch: KJP to Doocy on whether President Biden knew his son would defy a congresional subpoena: "I don't have anything else to add. The President was familiar with what Hunter was going to say today &;‚ you know‚ look‚ he's proud of his son…how he's rebuilding his life back. He's going… pic.twitter.com/envjQGxsEl — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) December 13‚ 2023 This kind of question should be extremely easy to answer. If you’re asked whether the president told his son to defy a congressional subpoena‚ you should be able to respond and explain yourself. Instead‚ the White House press secretary cracks a joke‚ and starts talking about how much Joe Biden loves his son. What this means‚ almost certainly‚ is that Joe Biden did advise his son to defy the congressional subpoena‚ without any legal basis whatsoever. Under the standards Democrats established with Steve Bannon and several other Trump aides‚ that’s a crime.  And there’s an obvious motive for why Joe Biden would want his son to commit this crime. Hunter Biden himself made that motive very clear during his remarks to reporters yesterday. Watch: Hunter Biden moves the goalposts again: "My father was not financially involved in my business" pic.twitter.com/n9L3miu2h8 — RNC Research (@RNCResearch) December 13‚ 2023 Did you catch the qualifier there? Hunter wants you to know that his father was not “financially involved” in his business dealings with corrupt oligarchs in Ukraine and China. So this is not a denial that Joe Biden was involved in Hunter Biden’s business dealings. Now it’s a denial that Joe Biden was “financially” involved. This is a very different claim from the one Joe Biden has been making for years. Watch: This is one HELL of a new qualifier from Hunter Biden. Hunter now says‚ “My father was not financially involved in my business” FLASHBACK: Joe Biden used to say he has never talked about business with his family. This is a major shift from the Bidens. pic.twitter.com/4oiALdD4Yg — Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) December 13‚ 2023 The reason for this change is the Biden family knows they can’t deny a direct link between Joe Biden and Hunter Biden’s influence peddling operation. Devon Archer‚ one of Hunter Biden’s business associates‚ has already testified in front of the House of Representatives‚ saying that Joe Biden spoke with Hunter Biden’s business partners roughly 20 times. Those conversations‚ according to Archer‚ took place while Joe Biden was the sitting vice president of the United States.  The Wall Street Journal also reported that Archer testified that‚ “Burisma would have gone out of business if it didn’t have the [Biden] brand attached to it.” As you will recall‚ Burisma is the Ukraine oil company that paid Hunter Biden tens of thousands of dollars a month for a no-show job‚ despite Hunter Biden having no oil expertise whatsoever. Burisma was being investigated by Ukraine’s attorney general‚ up until Joe Biden threatened to withhold money to Ukraine’s government until they fired him. Then there’s the fact that Joe Biden used a fake name to email with Hunter’s business partners. There’s also the many public comments of Tony Bobulinski‚ the Hunter Biden business partner who has repeatedly said that Joe Biden personally profited from Hunter Biden’s influence peddling. Bobulinski — who had no reason to lie whatsoever — told Tucker Carlson that Joe Biden was the “big guy” referenced repeatedly in emails on Hunter Biden’s laptop. The Big Guy‚ according to the emails‚ was slated to receive 10% of the profits from one business venture in China. It’s important to recount all of this because even now‚ Democrats are claiming that there are no witnesses to support the idea that Joe Biden could possibly be corrupt. Here’s AOC for example: "They have not called a single witness‚ a single first-hand witness to any of their allegations." AOC says Republicans don't have witnesses to back up their alleged allegations of Hunter Biden's financial crimes. pic.twitter.com/mMca5v7UhL — Citizen Free Press (@CitizenFreePres) December 13‚ 2023 This is how the Left plans to respond to the congressional investigation into Joe Biden. They’ll deny reality. They’ll pretend that witnesses don’t exist‚ even when those witnesses have appeared before Congress and on primetime television. They’ll make fun of you‚ as Karine Jean-Pierre did yesterday. All of this was foreseeable when Jerry Nadler‚ Leticia James‚ and other top Democrats decided to use the legal system and the impeachment process to punish their political opponents. It was inevitable that soon enough‚ they’d be forced to admit they can’t possibly live up to their own nonexistent standards. Just five years after Jerry Nadler’s conversation on that Acela‚ that moment is here now. Conservatives can either take advantage of it‚ or they can do what they usually do. They can make a big show for the cameras and completely fail to follow through. It’s clear that Karine Jean-Pierre and Hunter Biden think that will happen. They don’t believe their political enemies are anywhere near as ruthless and cynical as they are. For once‚ it’s time for conservatives to prove them wrong.

'The upper eyelid is a little suspicious'

'And for young people like this suspect‚ we hope this can be a teachable moment'

IRS Whistleblowers Unable To 'Verify' Loans White House Claims Joe Biden Sent To Family Members

'I bid you farewell'

'DeSantis Then Vs. Now'

'There's no evidence'