Denver Doubles Down on Migrant Response

#Bidenomics Update: Baby, It's Kohls-d Outside and Other Bad News

The Take Back Title IX Summer 2024 Bus Tour May be Coming Your Way

Japanese lawmakers met on Tuesday to create a nonpartisan group that will ask the government to establish an organization for investigating unidentified aerial phenomena, or UAP, also known as UFOs, reports japantimes.co.jp. The lawmaker group will be chaired by Yasukazu Hamada, parliamentary affairs leader of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party. Former Environment Minister Shinjiro Koizumi, also from the LDP, will serve as secretary-general. The group will hold its founding general meeting on June 6 after Tuesday’s preparatory meeting, which was held in parliament. The U.S. government has created a specialized organization in the Defense Department to probe UAP. The lawmaker group will urge the government to gather and analyze information on UAP and pursue cooperation with Washington by forming a counterpart organization. In its founding statement, the group said that if UAP, which have been witnessed many times over Japanese territory, are cutting-edge secret weapons or unmanned spy drones from other countries, they would present a major security threat to Japan. The group is asking members of parliament from all parties to join. The post Japanese lawmakers urge government to investigate UFOs appeared first on Anomalien.com.

Free the nip? A rather disturbing display of insanity took place Wednesday morning outside of the New York City court where deliberations for the flimsy legal case Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has against former president Donald Trump entered its first day of jury deliberation. What was shown by one protestor was none other than HIS bare breasts. Yup, you read that right. A grown transgender woman walked up to a gate surrounding the court and pulled up his T-shirt to expose his black bra. Then, in order to escalate things even more, he popped off his bra to expose his bare DD’s (or honestly probably GG’s). The transgender individual bounced his boobs next to a lady that was advocating to send Trump to jail. She held a sign that read “Lock him up.” (Warning: Graphic tranny version of women's breasts.) Show outside of NYC Court where Trump's trial deliberations begin today. pic.twitter.com/RYFcPl8hhp — Oliya Scootercaster ? (@ScooterCasterNY) May 29, 2024 The well-endowed trans then began screaming at someone else outside the court yelling things like “$9,000 b**ch” while bouncing his boobs up and down. “You got welfare titties b**ch,” he added while pointing at a real woman. “You ain’t a real woman honey, the real woman replied. "You are disgusting.” Then the real woman called the tranny a “charlatan,” which clearly triggered the trans woman. The kicker of all this is that the trans person then began screaming, “Hunter Biden’s laptop matters.” I’m unsure if he realizes that the conservative take is that, yes, Hunter Biden’s laptop does matter. But then again, the left shares one collective brain cell, so it’s likely the trans woman had no idea what he was even saying. What side of the debate was this freak even on? God only knows. What’s obvious though is that he's clearly mentally confused. “Bring back asylums,” a user wrote on X in response to the video. “Hope your eyes is ok after seeing that vile display of trash,” another wrote while one more called the display “pathetic.” No matter what side you’re on, for the love of God, keep your clothes on or stay home.

On the Thursday edition of WMAL’s O’Connor & Company, Media Research Center Founder and President Brent Bozell laid waste to ABC, CBS, and NBC for their “completely biased coverage of Donald Trump” as revealed by our latest study of the sham trial by Manhattan D.A. Alvin Bragg interfering in the 2024 election. Speaking to co-hosts Larry O’Connor and Mercedes Sclapp, Bozell said “the networks have no right to steal elections this way” with a mammoth 640 minutes since jury selection began and rank bias by omission with only three minutes during their evening shows on Michael Cohen’s perjury conviction and zero seconds on Judge Juan Merchan’s liberal ties. Most significantly, Bozell implored listeners at the end of the interview to remember these “broadcast airwaves are owned by the American people” and with this “deliberate attempt to interfere with the election” by “deliberately” withholding key facts about the trial, “it’s high time for Congress to hold hearings” because they “have no right to steal elections”. Earlier in the interview, he conceded the trial’s significance is “so serious that you should expect the networks to treat it seriously” and while “I’ll agree with you completely” that the 640 minutes wasn’t surprising, but a “look inside that coverage” reveals a murderer’s row of bias. After asking a rhetorical question of how the networks would react if Barack Obama were charged with the same crimes by a white prosecutor in Mississippi, he outlined the scant mentions of Cohen’s criminal record, which he argued is “[t]he whole key to the Trump defense”: With D.A. Alvin Bragg, who’s a Democrat who’s prosecuting Donald Trump, out of — get this number — out of 110 evening news stories, only three hinted that he was a Democrat. On NBC Nightly News, there were exactly two references. On ABC, they let it slip once — and that was Donald Trump quoting it. And CBS once never mentioned it once on the trial. It gets even better than that. What about Michael Cohen? The whole key to the Trump defense is that he is a serial liar and a convicted perjurer. Nearly one third of the coverage discussed Michael Cohen and yet, guess how many times they mentioned his conviction for perjury? Three minutes....The key to Donald Trump’s defense was given three minutes out of 640 minutes. Bozell also brought up the lack of mentions for Merchan’s conflicts of interest (including his donations to President Biden and an anti-Republican group) as well as how “[o]n average, more than one time every [evening] story, they’ve said that [Trump’s] a criminal.” Upon being told ABC was the worst, O’Connor proclaimed: “Yeah, the house that George Stephanopoulos built is the worst. Absolutely.” Before closing with a screed against the networks for poisoning the electorate, Bozell pointed out these coverage tallies have real-world impacts with an NBC poll giving Biden “a landslide of 55 percent to 35 percent” over Trump in November among “people who say they primarily get their information from national network news”.

The scent of desperation permeated the set of ABC’s The View on Wednesday as the liberal ladies teamed up with First Lady Jill Biden to shriek like banshees about how, if Republicans won in November and got to put another conservative justice on the Supreme Court, “We will lose all of our rights!” Co-host Joy Behar also shrilly vented to Biden about people questioning her husband’s mental acuity. Near the end of the second of three segments, Dr. Biden implored everyone to “think of the Supreme Court, for God's sake!” “Talk about things getting worse,” she added, “Can you imagine if we put any more Republicans on the Supreme Court?” “We’re finished,” Behar announced. Biden then fear mongered that “We will lose all of our rights” and got resounding agreement from moderator Whoopi Goldberg: BIDEN: So, we're talking about women's rights, gay rights, I mean, we will lose our rights and freedoms! GOLDBERG: Voting rights! BIDEN: Voting rights, yes! GOLDBERG: Voting rights. All of this is up at stake. Earlier in the first segment, Behar lamented that the American people didn’t trust President Biden’s mental fitness for office. She defended him by boasting about how he once told her he exercised “every day.” “Yes, every day,” the First Lady agreed.     “What do we have to do to tell people that the man is competent, alert, and doing the job and it's not about his age?” Behar raged. Ignoring all of Biden's senior moments, she lashed out at former President Trump, declaring: “The other one is doddering and doesn't remember anything and can't put a sentence together and has like brain farts in the middle of a paragraph and they go after Joe.” Biden suggested that the election was “not about age” because they were similar in age, but rather “about character.” Further in the interview, pretend independent Sara Haines shared her enthusiasm for how heavy CNN would be with their “guardrails” during the debate because they would have control of Trump’s microphone. “Donald Trump will gaslight, he over-talks,” she griped. Asked about “what is the strategy” her husband would be using, Biden laughably suggested that her husband doesn’t “scream” at anyone. “No, they built that in where they’re gonna turn off the mics so that somebody can't ramble or scream at somebody, you know, not that my husband would be the one doing that,” she asserted. But according to an Axios article from the summer of 2023, “Biden angrily yells, curse at aides in private.” “Behind closed doors, Biden has such a quick-trigger temper that some aides try to avoid meeting alone with him. Some take a colleague, almost as a shield against a solo blast,” national political reporter Alex Thompson wrote. Of course, faux-conservative Alyssa Farah Griffin was her usual useless self and didn’t push back on any of it. The transcript is below. Click "expand" to read: ABC’s The View May 29, 2024 11:18:17-11:19:07 a.m. Eastern (…) JOY BEHAR: But I know, I have met him a couple of times. He seems right on top of it. I said last time he was here, “do you work out?” He said, “Yes. Every day.” JILL BIDEN: Yes, every day. BEHAR: What do we have to do to tell people that the man is competent, alert, and doing the job and it's not about his age? The other one is doddering and doesn't remember anything and can't put a sentence together and has like brain farts in the middle of a paragraph and they go after Joe. BIDEN: Well, you know - This is – This election is not about age because like you said -- I mean Donald Trump's going to be, what, 78? And Joe is 81. They're basically the same age. BEHAR: Right. BIDEN: But it’s about character. (…) 11:19:35-11:20:43 SARAH HAINES: Donald Trump will gaslight, he over talks- there are no guardrails. So- BEHAR: He stalks. HAINES: Yeah, well I happen to believe it's really important more than ever to have a debate with guardrails. What is the strategy that the president has going into this, any tips you’d have for a debate that we could pull off where we could actually hear our candidates? BIDEN: No, they built that in where they’re gonna turn off the mics so that somebody can't ramble or scream at somebody, you know, not that my husband would be the one doing that. And so, that's already been negotiated and, you know, I think -- but I think the American people deserve a debate because you need to see your choices. You need to see Trump and you need to see the President and you need to see the differences. And my husband -- and you're going to see how smart he is and the experience he has and then you'll see somebody who, like you're saying, I'm gonna use Joy's words, can't put a sentence together and everything is beautiful and it is wonderful- BEHAR: Tremendous. SUNNY HOSTIN: Bigly. BIDEN: Yeah, yeah tremendous. (…) 11:23:09-11:23:39 BIDEN: But we cannot take things for granted because they can – And think of the Supreme Court, for God's sake, talk about things getting worse. Can you imagine if we put any more Republicans on the Supreme Court? HOSTIN: No, no.

A woman who was caught on camera stealing a Chicago police SUV and then dragging the officer was found not guilty by a judge for attempted murder and four other charges by reason of insanity.CWBChicago reported Whitley Temple will have to complete a treatment plan instead of serving prison time due to Judge Tyria Walton's ruling. Temple was filmed by a bystander and a city surveillance camera during the incident. It started when Officer Ed Poppish was responding to shots fired when he saw Temple lying half-naked in the street. When he stopped to help her, Temple got up from the pavement and walked around him to get into the squad car’s driver’s seat.Poppish tried to stop her, but she allegedly told him, “Let me go. This has nothing to do with you.”Temple was hired as as a lead accountant at the city’s Department of Family and Support Services while the case was still pending.Temple put the SUV in reverse and started to drag Poppish, hitting another car behind the SUV before Poppish was able to get free of the vehicle. Your browser does not support the video tag. Temple went on a bit of a joyride with the SUV. She drove the vehicle to a gas station, got out while it was still rolling, went into the station, came back out, and drove away again. Driving at high speeds, she weaved in and out of traffic on the expressway and ran through red lights. After hitting five occupied cars, Temple got out and ran down the block until police were finally able to arrest her.In true Chicago fashion, Temple was hired as as a lead accountant at the city’s Department of Family and Support Services while the case was still pending. She lost her job earlier this year after her hiring became public knowledge.CWBChicago noted Temple's bail had been set at $2 million, but her attorneys filed an appeal, saying the bail was excessive. An appellate court agreed, allowing her to go home with an ankle monitor after a relative posted her $7,500 bail deposit. The ankle monitor was removed last year.

UFC middleweight contender Paulo Costa has placed himself in contention for the worst first pitch of all time after an appearance at Citi Field before a New York Mets game.The curse of the Mets first pitch lived on through Costa after he arrived in Flushing, Queens, New York, ahead of UFC 302. While his fight against former champion and fan favorite Sean Strickland is hosted in Newark, New Jersey, "Borrachinha" stopped in the Big Apple to throw out the ceremonial first pitch before the Mets played the Los Angeles Dodgers.While the Brazilian is beloved by fans in his own right, nothing could shelter him from how bad his pitch was.The public address announcer is heard saying, "All right Paulo, it's your pitch!" right as the fighter prepared to throw the ball. Wearing a dress shirt and dress pants, the 33-year-old wound up in a right-handed stance and threw the pitch about 10 feet to the left of home plate.Either in incredibly good spirits or oblivious to how bad his pitch was, Costa gave fans a thumbs up and a smile as he walked off the mound.Costa later summarized his pitch on social media as an "absolute laser."'I mean, the guy can throw a wheel kick though.'Surprisingly, the fighter's pitch may only be the second- or third-worst pitch by a celebrity at Citi Field. In 2009, also in May, radio producer Gary Dell'Abate threw a pitch so far off the right side of the plate that it hit a nearby umpire.What made things worse for the "The Howard Stern Show" personality was that he had practiced for weeks leading up to the event to ensure he wasn't later mocked for his performance when he returned to the radio show. Obviously, his practice did not yield the preferred results.What may be the most terrible celebrity pitch at Citi Field happened about five years later in 2014. Taking place again in May, Curtis "50 Cent" Jackson took a left-handed approach and threw the ball around 10-15 feet wide of the plate, almost hitting a photographer and then a cameraman. The best pitch ever?Tennis legend John McEnroe is considered to have possibly the best celebrity first pitch in New York Mets history.In 2016, at age 57 McEnroe threw an actual laser of a pitch seemingly just off the lower-left part of the plate, but still very close to a strike. The catcher for the Mets at the time can even be seen instinctively trying to frame the pitch and then fist pumps in celebration on his way to greet McEnroe on the mound.Adding to the conspiracy, the pitch took place in August, not May.Costa's opponent and fellow contender Strickland was asked about the first pitch at a UFC press conference."Did you see him throw out the first pitch at the baseball game yesterday?" a reporter asked Strickland."No! Was it pretty bad?" Strickland responded."It was about seven feet wide," the reporter claimed.Strickland, however, wasn't willing to condemn his opponent and gave him credit for being really good at a different sport."I mean the guy can throw a wheel kick though. I don't mind Costa, he's a funny guy," the 185-pound fighter added. Strickland also noted that he enjoyed Costa's joke about comparing dating a fat woman to being an early investor in Bitcoin."Getting one of these in your prime, regulating [her] diet and sending her [to] the gym is the same thing as buying Bitcoin in 2010," Costa explained.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

The U.S. House of Representatives passed a two-year extension of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act last month, and while the warrantless surveillance authority was said to only target foreign subjects, many Americans' communications could be subject to governmental searches.At the time, critical reforms that wished to address the pervasive abuse of the law had been rejected. Many privacy advocates argued that the reauthorization of Section 702 included alarming language, which broadened the material that could legally be surveilled by the authorities.'Warrantless FISA surveillance is an obvious violation of the Fourth Amendment ban on unreasonable searches.'"One of the things that Congress was ostensibly addressing in the most recent FISA reauthorization was the evolution of digital technology and the rise of cloud computing," Luke Hogg, executive director at the Foundation for American Innovation, said."By expanding the definition of what constitutes an 'Electronic Communication Service Provider,' the federal government can now require a wide array of services to provide information. Now, cloud services, data centers, and many other services that haven’t historically been covered by FISA are now required to help the federal government surveil foreign citizens."Intelligence Chairman Mark Warner led the charge in opposing to strip off the expansive language to make it more narrow. However, he offered to take up the issue again later in the year when the committee drafts its annual intelligence authorization bill.“We are working on it," Warner said. "I am absolutely committed to getting that fixed." He went on to say that the way the House amendment was crafted "raised a whole host of questions," especially concerning electronic communications service providers.“The idea that you draw it so broad, and then try to exclude things, well, you’re never going to be able to figure out all the possible exceptions,” Warner said.Section 702 is a violation of the Fourth AmendmentThe fundamental issue around Section 702's extension is that it changed the definition of electronic communications service providers. Now, more companies fall under this category, which means that they will be obligated to provide the government access to their communications.More businesses than ever throughout the U.S. will have to give the government access to Wi-Fi routers, phones, and other electronic equipment."Warrantless FISA surveillance is an obvious violation of the Fourth Amendment ban on unreasonable searches," Samuel Karnick, a senior fellow at the Heartland Institute, told Blaze News. "The fact that large majorities in the current Congress do not consider such searches unreasonable shows how far our nation's respect for fundamental rights has declined."The Fourth Amendment reads as follows: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.The Center for Democracy and Technology reported in April that the "House's decision by the narrowest of margins — a 212-212 tie — to renew the legislation for two years without a warrant requirement will allow this abuse to continue, and is a serious blow to Americans' civil rights and civil liberties."The extension of Section 702 gives the CIA, FBI, and NSA the power to access Americans' private messages without any court approval. There is a backdoor search loophole that has already been used by government agencies to look up the private communications of campaign donors, lawmakers, journalists, and protesters throughout the country.Nathan Leamer, executive director at the Digital First Project, said that the "intelligence community has made it clear that they will turn over every stone and look behind every tree to catch the 'bad guys' out of fear that terrorists may be using emerging technologies or other communications systems."Leamer added that because so much of the discussion about FISA takes place behind closed doors, including "classified briefings," Americans have to blindly place their trust in the government that there is some justifiable reason why they are leveraging these surveillance powers.The American Civil Liberties Union exposed what appeared to be a contradiction in President Joe Biden's stance on FISA. Sixteen years ago, then-Senator Biden voted against the FISA Amendments Act, which was an effort to collect Americans' international phone calls, emails, text messages, and other digital communications.Now, Biden's administration is defending the very same law that he voted against all those years ago. When Biden was still a senator, he said Section 702 "would be a breathtaking and unconstitutional expansion of the President's powers and it is wholly unnecessary to address the problems the administration has identified.” He went on to say that he refused to "give the President unchecked authority to eavesdrop on whomever he wants in exchange for the vague and hollow assurance that he will protect the civil liberties of the American people.”However, his administration now has the very power he wished to withhold from previous presidents.The future of unwarranted surveillanceIt is still uncertain how the future of unwarranted surveillance might look, but it seems possible that human spying efforts are going away. With the proliferation of artificial intelligence technologies, it is conceivable that the government could reel in vast amounts of personal data under the guise of protecting Americans.AI-powered systems will inevitably change the nature of data management in the future. One report noted that by 2025, there will be more than 180 zettabytes of data. This vast amount of information, coupled with the steep acceleration of AI technologies, could usher in a more expansive form of mass surveillance that was never possible before.The bipartisan concern over Americans' privacy since Edward Snowden revealed the dark underbelly of the NSA's spying apparatus may only become more serious with the deployment of more sophisticated AI surveillance tools. In 2023, Snowden suggested that he was cautiously optimistic about the advent of AI. While some experts have warned that AI could be leveraged by bad actors, the well-known whistleblower said that there are many positive elements of the emerging technology.Snowden said that AI models could work to push back against government surveillance instead of supporting intelligence programs. "Maybe they could stop spying on the public and start spying for the public," Snowden said, adding that this scenario would "be a net good."The whistleblower went on to say that "we don't need machines to be like us; we need them to be better than us."Despite this bit of optimism, Hogg said that Americans who care about their privacy "should absolutely be concerned about the expansion of FISA."Since there are other ways to "legitimately gather information on American citizens," Hogg added that "without transparency reforms and warrant requirements, this expansion of FISA will almost certainly increase the illegal surveillance of American citizens."Leamer noted that one benefit of the debate over Section 702 is that it "will sunset in two years, which will give Congress and the American people another opportunity to debate and discern the future of the program."It is still unclear how far AI might evolve in the next two years and if it will have any bearing on the future of surveillance throughout the country.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!