MSNBC talking head Nicolle Wallace performed, with the aid of a former Jan. 6 committee member, yet another mental gymnastics routine on Monday, framing as ludicrous the suggestion that the targeted violence against federal agents in Los Angeles over the weekend amounted to an insurrection while insisting that the Jan. 6, 2021, riot in Washington, D.C., still qualified.By way of their acrobatics, Wallace and former Virginia Rep. Denver Riggleman accomplished little more than reveal "insurrection" to be a term used by liberals to differentiate riots on the left from riots on the right. "Insurrection" is not explicitly defined by federal law. It is, however, prohibited and generally understood to be an organized and violent act of revolt against an established government or civil authority. Although a riot is similarly characterized by violence, it alternatively tends to be more spontaneous and localized.Elements of the Washington establishment and the liberal media spent years hyperventilating about how the riot at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 — not the deadly 2020 Black Lives Matter riots that resulted in billions of dollars in damage, thousands of businesses ruined, and 2,037 police officers assaulted or injured — was somehow an insurrection. This suggestion was used to great political effect. For instance, its acceptance enabled the Democrat-appointed justices on Colorado's Supreme Court to rule in 2023 that Coloradans couldn't vote for then-candidate Donald Trump for president — a decision later echoed by a Democratic judge in Illinois but ultimately struck down by the Supreme Court.RELATED: After Trump's decisive action, protests cooling in LA Carlin Stiehl / Los Angeles Times via Getty ImagesSome of the same personalities who liberally threw around "insurrection" in recent years, when doing so meant maligning peaceful Trump supporters and the unarmed boneheads who stole into the U.S. Capitol in 2021, are now coming out of the woodwork to insist that the term's use to describe the targeted leftist revolt against governmental forces in California is inaccurate. As always, MSNBC has been one of their go-to platforms, if not their base of operations. Hosts, contributors, and staff at MSNBC have used the term "insurrection" without reservation when speaking of Jan. 6. MSNBC legal analyst Joyce Vance dubbed it a "mass insurrection." Former MSNBC talking head Joy Reid routinely referred to the rioters and protesters as "insurrectionists." The team over at "The Rachel Maddow Show" also adopted the term with that specific target.Wallace continued using it in reference to Jan. 6 on her show Monday but bristled at the mention of White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller referring to the L.A. riots as an insurrection and of both Trump and Vice President JD Vance calling some of the rioters who violently attacked U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents "insurrectionists."Wallace said that "insurrection" is an important word, not only because of its relevance regarding the invocation of the Insurrection Act but because "anyone older than 4 years old remembers an actual insurrection and the way Trump spent his first day in office the second time, pardoning all the rioters involved in January 6."'It's about the target and purpose of it.'Riggleman warned Wallace that the Trump administration is "trying to take the language of January 6."A similar game was being played over at CNN, where senior reporter Aaron Blake accused Trump of using a "broad definition of 'insurrection.'" RELATED: A president’s job is to stop the burning if governors won’t Photo by Apu Gomes/Getty ImagesWhereas Wallace focused on reminding her viewers that the L.A. riots didn't satisfy her criteria for insurrection, Blake identified other uses of the term that he regards as problematic, such as Stephen Miller characterizing an Obama judge's recent decision to undermine the executive branch and temporarily prevent the Trump administration from revoking status for over 500,000 illegal aliens as a "legal insurrection against democracy and the American people"; and Miller's suggestion that the radicals who marched on the Supreme Court and illegally mounted a pressure campaign at conservative justices' homes around the time of the high court's Dobbs decision were engaged in "an open insurrection.""An insurrection isn't about the level of violence," wrote Blake. "It's about the target and purpose of it."So long as the liberal establishment agrees with radicals' target and purpose, it appears it will refrain from calling organized revolts against governmental targets for a political purpose "insurrections."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Democrat California Gov. Gavin Newsom was dealt a judicial defeat after he requested an emergency motion to halt President Donald Trump's order to use the military to oppose the Los Angeles riots. Newsom named the president, the Defense secretary, and the Department of Defense as defendants in the request, and a judge allowed the defendants 24 hours to file a response to the request. 'Defendants intend to use unlawfully federalized National Guard troops and Marines to accompany federal immigration enforcement officers on raids.' United States District Judge Charles Breyer temporarily allowed the order to the National Guard to continue until Thursday, when the motion would be reconsidered after the defendants answered and the plaintiffs also responded. Newsom had accused the president of trying to "militarize" Los Angeles. He asked the judge to halt the order within two hours of his filing. “Defendants intend to use unlawfully federalized National Guard troops and Marines to accompany federal immigration enforcement officers on raids throughout Los Angeles," the lawsuit claimed. “They must be stopped, immediately.”The Trump administration filed a statement calling the request "legally meritless." The lawsuit said that the troops were not meant to secure federal buildings, as Trump has claimed. “Specifically, these activities ― scheduled to begin today, June 10, 2025 ― will include ‘holding a secure perimeter in communities around areas where immigration enforcement activities would take place, and securing routes over public streets where immigration enforcement officers would travel,'" the lawsuit continued. RELATED: Los Angeles descends into chaos after police chief says officers will not aid ICE agents; Trump sends National Guard troops Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images The lawsuit claimed that the plan by the administration was meant to be replicated across the country. California Attorney General Rob Bonta accused the president of acting unlawfully. “The President is looking for any pretense to place military forces on American streets to intimidate and quiet those who disagree with him. It’s not just immoral — It’s illegal and dangerous,” said Bonta. “Local law enforcement, not the military, enforce the law within our borders." Judge Breyer is the brother of the former Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer and was appointed by former President Bill Clinton in 1997. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Watch a Rioter Throwing Fireworks at Police Allegedly Catch a Rubber Bullet to the Face

BREAKING: Federal Judge Rules on Newsom's Motion to SHUT DOWN Trump’s Efforts To Stop the Riots

Terry Moran Out at ABC Following Suspension Over Anti-Trump Rant

New: Judge Responds to Newsom's Emergency Motion to Stop Trump From Deploying Troops in Los Angeles

Apple didn't announce any new hardware at WWDC 2025, but the iOS 26 beta seems to have confirmed the existence of an unannounced device. According to MacRumors contributor Steve Moser, there are references to "AirPods Pro 3" in the code of iOS 26 developer beta 1, which is noteworthy, considering Apple hasn't announced them yet. Did Apple just leak its new AirPods? Apple was once a bastion of security when it came to keeping secrets, but the company is now as porous as Samsung or Google. Nearly Every Apple product pops up online weeks or months before the company officially reveals it. Sometimes, Apple is even the party responsible for said leaks, as was apparently the case with the AirPods Pro 3. Moser did note that he "couldn't find any other references or hints as to what new features" the AirPods Pro 3 might have. Apple might have leaked the name, but we'll have to look elsewhere to find out what to expect from its next pair of premium earbuds. Previous AirPods Pro 3 leaks Thankfully, leakers have been hot on the trails of these earbuds for months. Although none of the details have been officially confirmed, we do have a rough idea of what to expect from the AirPods Pro 3 when they arrive at some point in the future. In fact, our own José Adorno rounded up all of the most exciting rumors about the new earbuds earlier this year. The most notable rumored upgrades included improved active noise cancellation (ANC), heart rate and body temperature sensors, and the new H3 chip. As for the design, we've heard that the earbuds will be getting a new look, and there's a decent chance that Apple will adopt the slimmer case of the AirPods 4. There's still plenty we don't know about the AirPods Pro 3, but we'll be keeping an eye out for more leaks ahead of the expected launch at the end of 2025. Don't Miss: iOS 26 is bringing two exciting new features to your AirPods The post iOS 26 might have confirmed the existence of AirPods Pro 3 appeared first on BGR. Today's Top Deals Best deals: Tech, laptops, TVs, and more sales Today’s deals: $299 Apple Watch Series 10, $38 Sony portable speaker, $249 DJI Mini 4K drone, more Today’s deals: Nintendo Switch games, $5 smart plugs, $150 Vizio soundbar, $100 Beats Pill speaker, more Today’s deals: $15 Amazon credit, rare PS5 Pro sale, $263 HP Stream laptop, $298 Sony XM5 headphones, more

Shortly before riots and protests broke out in Los Angeles, a CBS News/YouGov poll found that the majority of Americans, 54%, approve of President Donald Trump deporting illegal migrants, compared to 46% who oppose.

Four former staffers of President Joe Biden have agreed to testify before the House Oversight Committee as part of a Republican-led investigation into what GOP lawmakers allege was a coordinated effort to conceal the president's mental decline, Axios reported.

Three decades after Full House, the television sitcom created by Jeff Franklin, ended its original run on ABC, the beloved cast has maintained an unbreakable bond. For the cast members, Full House was more than a job, all thanks to the late Bob Saget, who played a crucial role in ensuring that the cast stayed in touch with each other after the show ended. Recently, Jodie Sweetin, who played Stephanie Tanner, disclosed that despite having a close relationship with her Full House co-stars, she was very displeased with the action of one of her co-stars, Dave Coulier, who shared a horrifying text on their group chat. Dave Coulier sent a horrifying text to the ‘Full House’ group chat – and it’s not what you think it is Jodie Sweetin, Dave Coulier/Imagecollect/Instagram During the recording of a live episode of her Full House rewatch podcast, How Rude, Tanneritos!, on June 5, Sweetin discussed how her former co-star Dave Coulier, who played the character of Joey Gladstone in a bid to keep the group chat very lively recently shared an AI-generated image that reimagined the Full House cast as younger, goth versions of themselves, which sparked both amusement and bewilderment among the actors. She explained that the photo collection used a Kourtney Kardashian lookalike standing in for Lori Loughlin’s character, Becky Katsopolis, with her and the Olsen twins appearing ageless. Coulier also included the late Saget in his edit, depicting him as Geddy Lee, the iconic lead singer of Rush. The only notable exception was actress Mary-Kate, who bore a striking resemblance to her current self. Full House cast reunion/Instagram Jodie Sweetin gives insight into how she felt about Dave Coulier’s text Sweetin revealed that the images that Coulier might have intended to amuse or impress struck her as very eerie and unnatural when she first saw them. FULL HOUSE/Everett collection However, she noted that after taking a step back and giving herself time to process everything, she came to understand the joke and acknowledged that it was, in fact, clever. Next up: A Walk Down Memory Lane: Lori Loughlin And John Stamos Reunite To Celebrate 1991 ‘Full House’ Wedding The post Jodie Sweetin Gives Details About ‘Horrifying’ Text Dave Coulier Sent In ‘Full House’ Group Chat appeared first on DoYouRemember? - The Home of Nostalgia. Author, Peace A