Stunning new undercover footage of Nancy Pelosi’s daughter reveals that the DC elites know that there’s something fishy about January 6th. In fact‚ this video appears to show Pelosi’s daughter essentially calling January 6th a hoax. Specifically‚ she said: You’re doing to be able to laugh about this one day. Really? The Democrats told us that J6 was the day democracy almost died. They claimed that this was the worst “attack” on America… even worse than 9/11! They claimed that J6 was the worst thing since the Civil War. So… if that’s true‚ why would we laugh about it? Don’t take our word for it. Watch Pelosi’s daughter for yourself: On January 6‚ 2021‚ Nancy Pelosi's daughter‚ Alexandra Pelosi‚ was filming the events surrounding her mother for a documentary.The following video was filmed during a meeting with a January 6 defendant whom she wanted desperately to be in her documentary. Alexandra Pelosi… pic.twitter.com/Xh2aWUBJoN — CitizenLenz (@CitizenLenz) July 18‚ 2023 pic.twitter.com/Fw6Ivu1caR Hear Nancy Pelosi’s daughter admit Jan 6 was a set up by the establishment &; there was no insurrection. If you believed the establishment propaganda on Jan 6 you are a typical American‚ a.k.a a chump They will do the same to you if you ever oppose the… — Jimmy Dore (@jimmy_dore) November 25‚ 2023 How Speaker Pelosi and daughter sold the Insurrection Narrative on J6. Astounding and EVIL. https://t.co/RHfYJ1c0O5 — Juanita Broaddrick (@atensnut) November 25‚ 2023 If J6 was as dangerous as they claim‚ it would be no laughing matter. No matter how much time has passed. Yet‚ this under cover video reveals the politicization of what happened. It suggests that Democrats knew they were pushing a false narrative and were strategically doing so. According to PJ Media: Nancy Pelosi’s nepo-baby‚ Alexandra‚ was caught on camera admitting essentially that January 6 and the ensuing prosecutions were a marketing gimmick to propagandize the public for the benefit of the Democrat Party. The video‚ apparently filmed surreptitiously in the style of Project Veritas and released by CitizenLens‚ reportedly between Pelosi and a January 6 defendant she was courting so as to appear in her documentary of the event‚ featured Pelosi discussing the political implications of the Jan 6 show trials and their effects on the upcoming 2022 mid-term elections. This news comes off the heels of never-before-seen J6 footage being released to the public. No matter how hard they try‚ their narrative is falling apart before our very eyes. This is Nancy Pelosi’s daughter caught explaining how the democrats are using lawfare to persecute‚ not prosecute‚ their political enemies Release the J6 prisoners now pic.twitter.com/Q3HsY9XgdE — CaliRN619 (@CaliRN619) November 25‚ 2023 Alexandra Pelosi Explaining The Need For The Psyop That’s About To Be Unleashed Against The American People Nancy Pelosi's Daughter Is Talking About The Importance Of 24/7 Media Lies To Push A False Narrative About January 6th. She CLEARLY States There Was “No Insurrection‚ No… pic.twitter.com/MfIDOPvZ1M — Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) November 19‚ 2023 Nancy Pelosi’s daughter caught on camera discussing January 6th participants. You cannot tell me J6 wasn’t completely orchestrated!! All of these people belong in prison. pic.twitter.com/SbNAUth8DB — Steve (@SteveLovesAmmo) November 25‚ 2023 There are many people sitting in jail right now. If January 6th was indeed a laughing matter‚ then why are they in jail? Why aren’t they being given fair and speedy trials? Let’s emphasize how strategic this propaganda is. Look at her words for yourself: After the Democrats lose the House and then they get rid of the committee‚ people may lose interest. The first trials are gonna get a lot of attention. It’s like [an] anniversary; the first one is a big deal… No one’s gonna care after the Democrats are out of power. And then take Biden out of office‚ then who cares?… I know you’re not the bad guys [to the Jan 6 defendant]… If it was an insurrection… you were supposed to have a plan…. You’re going to be able to laugh about this one day. “I know you’re not the bad guys”? This proves the DC elite knows the truth. And they are pulling this sham over the American people. Share this article far and wide! You know the mainstream media won’t cover it!

Rules for thee‚ but not for me! Every year‚ the UN hosts a climate conference where they discuss how to fight climate change. Of course‚ they lecture us on how we need to be more green… But here’s the ironic part: The most recent UN climate conference may have caused the most pollution ever! Over 400 private jets were used to fly to this conference. Private jets‚ especially that many‚ pollute far more than commercial airlines. Also‚ why are these people flying in private jets? Are they too good to sit and fly with the rest of us? Shouldn’t they practice what they preach? By flying private‚ they’re adding more to their carbon footprint than if they had flown commercial. The hypocrisy! UN climate confab may have largest carbon footprint in event’s history‚ more than 400 jets | Just The News https://t.co/6OlnZp03EP — John Solomon (@jsolomonReports) November 25‚ 2023 I love it when 400 private jets fly to the UN Climate Conference to tell the peasants to ride bikes‚ eat bugs and live in tents. — Celestial Being (@CelestialB12) November 25‚ 2023 You can't be a Leftist without being a Hypocrite. Corrupt @UN climate confab may have largest carbon footprint in event’s history‚ more than 400 jetshttps://t.co/GpXPW9cGfR pic.twitter.com/aGOH96hjrQ — The Patriot Hammer (@patriot_hammer) November 25‚ 2023 Of course‚ they tell the rest of us to walk‚ ride bikes‚ or take mass transit. But apparently commercial transportation is beneath them. Just the News has the details: Do as we say‚ Not as we do: Last year’s UN climate conference — attended by climate bureaucrats and celebrity climate activists — saw more than 400 private jets used by attendees. This year‚ organizers expect even more to arrive. The upcoming United Nations (UN) climate conference in the United Arab Emirates (UAE)‚ known as COP28‚ appears likely to have a larger carbon footprint than any previous UN climate change summit. More than 70‚000 people are expected to show up to COP28‚ about 25‚000 more people than last year’s summit‚ COP27. The conference‚ which runs from Nov. 30 through Dec. 12‚ will focus on global strategies to reduce emissions and accelerate the shift away from fossil fuels in favor of green energy. Here’s the reality: If these folks were truly concerned about the climate‚ they would be practicing what they’re preaching. The fact that they’re being hypocrites should raise a lot of questions! UN climate confab may have largest carbon footprint in event’s history‚ more than 400 jets https://t.co/D8Ur6bWWp3 — Just the News (@JustTheNews) November 25‚ 2023 SO all these people will on PRIVATE JETs arriving in a country… which has dubious human rights to talk climate‚ a country who got right on OIL… you could not make it up could you … the UN is not fit for purpose https://t.co/THFAlWbi7y — Walker Henry Smith (@WalkerHenrySmi1) November 24‚ 2023 Here’s where things get worse. Apparently‚ the UN has been called out on this before. And instead of improving‚ they’ve gotten worse! They’re polluting now more than ever! Why should we take them seriously? The New York Post details previous blowback against the UN’s climate pollution: They’re burning the climate at both ends. Activists have lambasted delegates to this year’s United Nations climate conference as hypocrites for traveling to the confab in Sharm El-Sheik‚ Egypt by private jet. Egyptian authorities told AFP that some 400 private jets had flown in to the Red Sea resort city from around the world for the global meeting on limiting carbon emissions — known as COP27. The meeting kicked off days after activists across Europe and the United States blockaded airports in protest of private jets. European advocacy group Transport and Environment estimates that a private jet can emit two tons of carbon dioxide in one hour — five to 14 times more pollution per passenger than a commercial airliner. 14 TIMES more pollution. Wow. And they threaten the rest of us about using gas stoves! Before we practice what they preach‚ perhaps they should lead by example. Share this article if you agree!

Joe Biden claims to be a devout Catholic. So why did he snub “Almighty God” in the annual presidential Thanksgiving proclomation? This is a tradition that goes back centuries. And it appears that Biden could be the only president (aside from Barack Obama) to completely avoid mentioning God on the day our nation gives thanks. NOT SMART. https://t.co/nepGYWlpP2 — Breitbart News (@BreitbartNews) November 25‚ 2023 Biden Officially Attempts to Remove God from Thanksgiving with 2023 Proclamation via @gatewaypundit https://t.co/kSargyFlEs — The Gateway Pundit (@gatewaypundit) November 24‚ 2023 In fact‚ Abraham Lincoln himself said that we should always remember to thank God above. If Joe is so strong in his faith‚ then why is he the only president who has refused to thank God on Thanksgiving? I don’t know about you‚ but to me‚ that’s not a good idea. According to Breitbart: President Joe Biden omitted any reference to Almighty God or Divine Providence Thursday in his annual proclamation of the quintessentially American feast of Thanksgiving. In his own 1863 presidential proclamation instituting Thanksgiving as a national holiday‚ Abraham Lincoln urged his fellow Americans to set apart and observe the last Thursday of November “as a day of Thanksgiving and Praise to our beneficent Father who dwelleth in the Heavens.” […] Fast forward 160 years‚ and it would seem that the “devoutly Catholic” President Joe Biden has done just that‚ insisting in his own 2023 proclamation of Thanksgiving that Lincoln had established this national holiday “to honor the blessings of our country‚” rather than to praise and thank God. Could this be a slip of the tongue? It’s unlikely. Presidential appearances are tightly scripted. And Joe Biden is known to rely on a teleprompter. This suggests that the idea to snub God was intentional. Well‚ Joe Biden can go to Catholic mass each day‚ but God knows Joe's murderous position on unrestricted abortion &; and Joe's other slights of God are in line with Joe's entire hypocritical life!https://t.co/kJVUgJdhzL — Daniel F. Baranowski (@DFBHarvard) November 25‚ 2023 Biden’s radical handlers will no longer allow Joe to acknowledge God. More proof that this Democrat White House hates the country &; our founding traditions. “You know‚ the thing….” Biden Officially Removes God from Thanksgiving with 2023 Proclamation https://t.co/SweULC987f — ProsperousUSA (@Prosperous1776) November 25‚ 2023 Keep in mind‚ Joe Biden has a lot to be thankful for. He has a house that’s worth tens of millions of dollars. And he apparently “won” the 2020 election in a historic landslide while literally campaigning from his basement. You’d think he’d be thankful‚ right? Apparently not. The Independent Journal Review confirms the snub: When we say the word “Thanks-giving‚” it presumes the giving of thanks. But to whom is that thanks given? Since the first Thanksgiving on Plymouth Rock and its subsequent establishment as a day of thanks on Oct. 3‚ 1789‚ the recipient of that thanks on behalf of the United States of America has always been God. But in keeping with the destruction of everything good and virtuous in this nation‚ this year‚ God has been removed as the recipient of thanks on Thanksgiving. On Wednesday‚ President Biden released his Thanksgiving proclamation for 2023. For the first time in American history‚ the proclamation completely omitted any reference to God or faith. Joe Biden may think that this move will score him political points. But in the heavenly realm‚ this could have far reaching consequences. So what do you think? Do you think this was ok? Or was this a miss by Joe Biden? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below!

Here we go. The United Nations has just released a report detailing their plan to curb online speech in an effort to “fight misinformation.” But there’s just one problem: In the United States‚ we have a little thing we like to call Free Speech. And yes‚ that includes “misinformation.” The problem with misinformation is that everyone will have different view points on what is considered “truth.” That’s the beauty of free speech. People should be able to decide for themselves. After all‚ wasn’t the internet meant to be an open exchange of ideas? Instead‚ a global authority that has nothing to do with the United States is threatening to censor our right to free speech! We are living under global government. Wake up and make it stop.Inside the UN Plan to Control Speech Onlinehttps://t.co/k3GINOjYq6 — Lara Logan (@laralogan) November 25‚ 2023 Speaking at the UN‚ WEF Young Global Leader and former PM of New Zealand‚ Jacinda Ardern‚ declares free speech a "weapon of war"‚ in the globalist war against so-called "disinformation"―i.e. any information that exposes the agenda for global control by unelected globalist… pic.twitter.com/b0pdfWuytq — Wide Awake Media (@wideawake_media) November 24‚ 2023 Inside the UN Plan to Control Speech Onlinehttps://t.co/67HhHUVkCd — Larry Elder (@larryelder) November 25‚ 2023 The scary thing is that once regulations are passed‚ they are very difficult to remove. The most important part is prevention. We must prevent this from happening – or else the way we use and access the internet will be changed forever. According to the Epoch Times: A powerful United Nations agency has unveiled a plan to regulate social media and online communication while cracking down on what it describes as “false information” and “conspiracy theories‚” sparking alarm among free-speech advocates and top U.S. lawmakers. In its 59-page report released this month‚ the U.N. Educational‚ Cultural‚ and Scientific Organization (UNESCO) outlined a series of “concrete measures which must be implemented by all stakeholders: governments‚ regulatory authorities‚ civil society‚ and the platforms themselves.” This approach includes the imposition of global policies‚ through institutions such as governments and businesses‚ designed to stop the spread of various forms of speech while promoting objectives such as “cultural diversity” and “gender equality.” In particular‚ the U.N. agency aims to create an “Internet of Trust” by targeting what it calls “misinformation‚” “disinformation‚” “hate speech‚” and “conspiracy theories.” Examples of expression flagged to be stopped or restricted include concerns about elections‚ public health measures‚ and advocacy that could constitute “incitement to discrimination.” The problem is that mainstream media is often used to determine what’s true or not. And as we know‚ the mainstream media tends to get a lot of things wrong. From Trayvon Martin to George Floyd to the 2020 election‚ the mainstream media has been on the wrong side of history. Yet‚ it’s the mainstream media that’s used to “fact check” anything posted online. A powerful UN agency has unveiled a plan to regulate social media and online communication while cracking down on what it describes as “false information” and “conspiracy theories‚” sparking alarm among free-speech advocates and top U.S. lawmakers. https://t.co/Ooq7FcipXH — Dr. Anastasia Maria Loupis (@DrLoupis) November 25‚ 2023 UNESCO (a UN Agency) has a plan to control speech online …. Why don’t we have avenues to resist these global organizations that are funded by our tax dollars? https://t.co/Bt4LXk0ROC — 爪aÉ€e ã„¥oꪜe (@MazeLove14) November 25‚ 2023 Once you start censoring speech‚ the world will never be the same. It’ll be the “beginning of the end‚” as they say. Even the ACLU‚ which is notoriously liberal‚ is against this UN plan: Given the importance of protecting political speech by political figures‚ the biggest platforms should strive to allow as much political speech as possible and avoid account-level punishments. And‚ if they decide to censor candidates‚ they should have a consistent plan in place for preserving the offending speech for transparency‚ research‚ and historical record purposes. In addition‚ all platforms should publicly explain their rules for removing posts and accounts of political figures and all users‚ and explain the penalties that can apply. Those rules must take into account the needs of human rights advocates‚ researchers‚ journalists‚ and others to access rule-violating content. And — contrary to what we’ve seen from most if not all of the companies — penalties should not be imposed on an ad-hoc or political basis. We recognize that the major platforms are private entities with their own First Amendment rights to control the content they publish. But the largest platforms’ central role in online speech also means they should err on the side of preserving political speech — and‚ given their scale‚ they must also offer clarity upfront‚ at a minimum stick to their own rules‚ and offer opportunities for appeals when they (inevitably) get things wrong. So what do you think? Do you support this move by the UN? If so‚ let us know in the comments below. But if you don’t‚ be sure to share this article. Information‚ not censorship‚ is key to fighting authoritarianism!

A second group of hostages have been released following a cease-fire agreement between Israel and Hamas.

Gigi Hadid DELETES ‘Jew-hating’ post that she shared with her 80 million followers‚ claiming Israel is ‘only country that keeps children as prisoners of war‚’  while totally ignoring that fact on Oct. 7ththe Hamas terrorists abducted many Israeli children and have been keeping them captive in underground tunnels in Gaza. Daily Mail (h/t Nita) What’s […]