Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., is demanding answers from Food and Drug Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary after he declined to give The Daily Signal a timeframe for his review on the abortion pill. “Yesterday, in response to the latest reports, you said, ‘There has been an ongoing review of mifepristone. It’s actually required as part of a policy called REMS,'” Hawley wrote, linking to The Daily Signal interview. “But that is not what you promised. You promised a new and comprehensive study taking account of all available safety data, not the standard monitoring FDA already performs for countless drugs.” The science is clear. The chemical abortion drug is not safe. FDA head Marty Makary needs to reinstate President Trump’s safety rules from his first term and stop stonewalling on a full safety review of mifepristone. Enough is enough. pic.twitter.com/SoVoumSB9W— Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) December 10, 2025 Makary told The Daily Signal Tuesday that the review of the abortion drug mifepristone is in the “data acquisition phase” following a Bloomberg report saying he is delaying the process until after midterms. “We do an ongoing review, but we’re also engaging in a robust study that can serve to validate or not validate other numbers that have been put out there in the literature,” the FDA chief said. Makary and Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. have pledged to do a review of the safety of abortion drugs. But Hawley said it is unclear if Makary is “conducting an independent safety review at all.” EXCLUSIVE??: @DrMakaryFDA responded to a report saying he is delaying the review of the abortion pill.The FDA is currently in the “data acquisition phase” of the review," he told @DailySignal.“We do an ongoing review, but we’re also engaging in a robust study that can serve… pic.twitter.com/bhkTwXqvby— Elizabeth Troutman Mitchell (@TheElizMitchell) December 9, 2025 “This is totally unacceptable,” the senator wrote. “I cannot emphasize enough the danger of playing politics with women’s health.” The Ethics & Public Police Center study found that about 11% of women experience sepsis, infection, hemorrhaging, or another serious adverse event within 45 days following a mifepristone abortion. This has led to calls to reinstate the in-person dispensing requirement for mifepristone. “The safety regulations from President Trump’s first term should be reinstated,” Hawley said. “But you have not done so. And news reports indicate you are attempting to sideline any review of mifepristone safety.” In response to Hawley’s letter, HHS press secretary Emily Hilliard said “FDA’s comprehensive scientific reviews take the time necessary to get the science right, and that is what Dr. Makary is ensuring as part of the Department’s commitment to gold-standard science and evidence-based reviews.” Hawley demanded direct answers on what the FDA is doing regarding the safety review. “Is the FDA conducting a comprehensive safety review of mifepristone separate from the REMS process?” Hawley asked, specifying that the answer should include when the study began and a specific timeline for its completion. “If you are conducting a comprehensive safety review, did you order it to be delayed? Why? Until when?” Hawley asked. When questioned by The Daily Signal about the timeline of the review, Makary said he is unable to predict the “results or the timeframe” of it.  “The shutdown was a little bit of a setback in that, but we’re gonna do it and whenever the results are available,” he said, “we’re gonna make them public.”  Hawley also asked if the FDA has plans to update the Mifepristone Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) “to restore basic safety guardrails from President Trump’s first term, such as in-person dispensing.” When asked by The Daily Signal if it’s safe for women to take the abortion pill at home without seeing a doctor first, Makary said the Ethics & Public Police Center study “was done in claims data, so it didn’t have granularity into the patient characteristics in a way that many researchers would want to have.”  He dismissed the report that he is delaying the review of the abortion pill as a rumor circulating on social media. “There’s a lot of rumors that are circulating out there,” he said. “We live in a very partisan time, and so you’re going to see the echo chambers of social media sort of magnify rumors, things that are just not true. There has been an ongoing review of mifepristone.”  Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America said “the reality is far worse” than a social media rumor. “Now, nearly a year into the Trump administration, the Dr. Makary abortion drug safety review hasn’t even passed the data-gathering phase and there’s no ETA,” the organization wrote on X in response to The Daily Signal’s interview. “That’s the definition of slow-walking.” “We repeat: Makary must go,” the leading pro-life organization said. The post Hawley Ramps up Pressure on FDA Chief After Daily Signal Interview appeared first on The Daily Signal.

The House of Representative passed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), an annual defense bill, by a vote of 312-112 Wednesday evening after a drama-filled day on the House floor. The NDAA with over a $900 billion price tag received support from both Republicans and Democrats, a rarity this Congress as House Speaker Mike Johnson has regularly had to pass major legislative items through the lower chamber with just a few votes to spare. The 312 in support of the bill was divided between 197 Republicans and 115 Democrats. Only 18 Republicans joined 94 Democrats in opposition. BREAKING: House passes compromise version of the NDAA in a 312-112 vote.It’s a wide bipartisan vote, though Democrats fairly closely divided on supporting the defense bill. pic.twitter.com/Ad4NyYVLZ3— Connor O'Brien (@connorobrienNH) December 10, 2025 Both the House and the Senate have previously passed their own versions of the NDAA, and the text is a compromise between the two. The topline spending number set in the bill is $8 billion above the White House’s budget request and includes some major wins for conservatives. These include a 4% pay raise for enlisted service members, ending “authorizations for use of military force” for previous Middle East wars, and a prohibition on programs related to diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, as well as critical race theory. Wins also came in the form of provisions left out of the bill, such as an artificial intelligence regulation moratorium and language that would have expanded IVF coverage. The bill additionally has oversight provisions over the executive branch. The Pentagon would not be allowed to reduce the number of active troops stationed in Europe below 76,000 for longer than a 45-day period unless it has certified to Congress that it is in the best interest of the United States and the decision has been reached after consultation with NATO allies. How the NDAA Almost Failed Drama came to the chamber during the vote on the rule to bring the bill to a vote, as Democrats refused to back the annual legislation which is often considered “must-pass” legislation. A large contingency of swing district Republicans, many of whom support extending Affordable Care Act premium tax credits, also withheld their votes for an extended period. House Majority Whip Tom Emmer and Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., huddled with these members for an extended period of time before they voted for the bill.  These informal huddles on the House floor between holdouts and leadership are often used to resolve policy questions and disagreements This group of swing district Republicans slow to make their vote included Reps. Mike Lawler and Nick LaLota of New York, as well as Brian Fitzpatrick and Rob Bresnahan of Pennsylvania. Additionally, multiple conservative firebrands, such as Reps. Eric Burlison of Missouri, Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, Anna Paulina Luna of Florida, and Lauren Boebert of Colorado, initially voted against the rule before ultimately backing it.  House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., engaged in a one-on-one conversation with Greene before she flipped her vote. On X, Greene, who is set to resign her seat on Jan. 5, 2026, said she had struck a deal with House leadership for her support on the NDAA. “I made a deal and changed my NO vote on the rule to a Yes in exchange for a floor vote next week on my bill that is one of President Trump’s key campaign promises and executive orders,” Greene said. “Leader Steve Scalise has promised me that my bill Protect Children’s Innocence Act, H.R. 3492, will be brought to the floor for a vote next Wednesday, Dec 17th.” The bill, Greene said, “would make it a class c felony to trans a child under 18. Every Republican campaigned to protect kids from the trans agenda.” I made a deal and changed my NO vote on the rule to a Yes in exchange for a floor vote next week on my bill that is one of President Trump’s key campaign promises and executive orders.Leader Steve Scalise has promised me that my bill Protect Children’s Innocence Act, H.R. 3492,…— Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene?? (@RepMTG) December 10, 2025 CNN’s correspondent Manu Raju reported after the rule vote that Burchett, Luna and Boebert had been won over after a few leadership concessions: a phone call with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, a promise of a vote on a bill to prohibit stock trading among members of Congress, and a vote on banning the potential creation of a digital U.S. dollar. An anti-central bank digital currency provision in the bill had been left out after previously being promised to members. Just spoke to conservative holdouts who ultimately voted to advance NDAABurchett/Luna/Boebert-They said they spoke to Rubio who assured them money going to certain NGOs won’t go to Taliban– won assurances to move version of Stock Act– concession from Johnson on crypto bill— Manu Raju (@mkraju) December 10, 2025 Shortly after flipping her vote, Luna posted on X, “Our Secretary of State [Marco Rubio] is incredible. He talked to us on the phone and told us he is cutting off all funding of US tax or dollars to Taliban. We will be providing him with the vehicle in which that is happening!” Rep. Burchett is the author of a bill to prevent United States funds from being sent to the Taliban in Afghanistan. It has not come to a vote in the Senate, causing frustration for Burchett. Luna had earlier on Wednesday complained of the NDAA, “The Senate GOP is pulling some massive trash with the NDAA meanwhile undermining POTUS with his confirmations. Guess what? NO ANTI-CBDC legislation in NDAA? Taxpayer dollars for Taliban? The same POS’s that shot my husband? UKRAINE funding? NDAA in current form is NO GO sincerely WE THE PEOPLE.” It appears that the phone call with Rubio may have been part of a deal to satisfy Luna and others’ concerns about taxpayer funds ending up in the hands of the Taliban.  The bill will now go to the Senate, where it will require 60 votes to proceed to a vote on the floor. The post House Agrees to Over $900 Billion in Pentagon Spending After Drama on the Floor appeared first on The Daily Signal.

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. It was sold as a “historic day,” the kind politicians like to frame with national pride and moral purpose. Cameras flashed in Canberra as Australia’s Prime Minister Anthony Albanese stood at the podium, declaring victory in the fight to “protect children.” What Australians actually got was a nationwide digital ID system. Starting December 10, every citizen logging into select online platforms must now pass through digital ID verification, biometric scans, face matching, and document checks, all justified as a way to keep under-16s off social media. Kids are now banned from certain platforms, but it’s the adults who must hand over their faces, IDs, and biometric data to prove they’re not kids. “Protecting children” has been converted into a universal surveillance upgrade for everyone. According to Albanese, who once said if he became a dictator the first thing he would do was ban social media, the Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2024 will “change lives.” He described it as a “profound reform” that will “reverberate around the world,” giving parents “peace of mind” and inspiring “the global community” to copy Australia’s example. The Prime Minister’s pride, he said, had “never been greater.” Listening to him, you’d think he’d cured cancer rather than making face scans mandatory to log in to Facebook. Sydney lit up the Harbour Bridge to celebrate Australia’s new online digital ID age verification law. The press conference had the feel of an awards show where everyone on stage gets a trophy. Communications Minister Anika Wells said, “December 10 will be remembered as a moment that sparked a movement.” South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas called it “a really special day.” Mel Pilling, the Courier-Mail editor who helped push the News Corp “Let Them Be Kids” campaign that lobbied for the law, echoed the talking points about a “historic day” that would “change lives” and “save lives.” The repetition was almost hypnotic. Every official and media figure used the same words, the same emotional framing. Nobody mentioned that the “change” involves handing one’s biometric data to a third-party verification vendor so that a regulator can confirm you’re not a 15-year-old trying to watch cat videos. Then came Julie Inman Grant, Australia’s eSafety Commissioner and top censor, defender of youth against the dark arts of free speech. Grant hailed the law as the world’s first real cure for what she called “one of the great social experiments of our time.” She predicted other nations would follow Australia’s lead, just as they once copied its policies on plain tobacco packaging and gun reform. “The world will follow,” she said. “How can you not follow a country who is clearly prioritizing teen safety ahead of tech profits?” Her office promised immediate enforcement. In a media release, eSafety vowed it “will not hesitate to take enforcement action” and threatened fines of up to $49.5 million for “systemic breaches.” Grant herself announced she would begin issuing “information notices” to ten major platforms the very next day. Later, in an interview with 10 News, Grant revealed that behind the moral triumph, things weren’t so glorious. She said pushing the law had “been shit” and that her office was “tired.” She complained that tech companies hadn’t “really applied themselves” and hadn’t done a “much better job” implementing her preferred verification systems. She called it “frustrating” before urging parents to report any platforms that “have not de-platformed your child.” It’s a strange sight: the official enforcing biometric compliance across an entire country also describes herself as exhausted and underappreciated. Yet even in fatigue, she remained eager to deputize parents as informants in her digital age patrol. Behind the speeches was a full public relations campaign. News Corp’s outlets, whose biggest competitors are social media platforms, framed the rollout as a moral victory, emphasizing that “Australia leads the world.” The coverage celebrated the architects of the law while warning that tech companies better comply. The message to other governments was unmistakable: copy this model or be accused of neglecting children. If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The post Australian Leaders and Legacy Media Celebrates Launch of Online Digital ID Age Verification Law appeared first on Reclaim The Net.

Somewhere in Madison, a lawmaker is staring at a Wi-Fi symbol like it’s a hieroglyphic. Around the table, other lawmakers nod along, pretending to understand. The problem, they say, isn’t that their age verification law is absurd. The problem is that people are using Virtual Private Networks to get around it. The solution: outlaw the VPNs. Become a Member and Keep Reading… Reclaim your digital freedom. Get the latest on censorship, cancel culture, and surveillance, and learn how to fight back. Join Already a supporter? Sign In. (If you’re already logged in but still seeing this, refresh this page to show the post.) The post From Madison to Moscow: How VPNs Work and Why Governments (Despite Trying) Can’t Stop Them appeared first on Reclaim The Net.

Brown poodle puppy adoption offers families a chance to welcome an intelligent, hypoallergenic companion into their homes. These curly-coated dogs come in various shades of brown and make excellent pets for active households. We at DogingtonPost understand that finding the right rescue poodle requires knowing where to look and how to prepare. This guide covers everything from locating reputable adoption sources to setting up your home for success. Understanding Brown Poodle Characteristics and Care Needs Brown poodles showcase coat colors that span from deep chocolate to café-au-lait, created by a recessive gene that both parents must carry. This genetic requirement makes brown poodles less common than their black or white counterparts, but their rich coloration creates striking visual appeal. The recessive nature of the brown gene means breeders must carefully select parent dogs to produce these distinctive puppies. Size Variations and Intelligence Traits Standard poodles weigh 44 to 70 pounds and stand at least 15 inches tall, while miniature and toy varieties offer smaller alternatives for different living situations. The American Kennel Club ranks poodles as the second most intelligent dog breed (following Border Collies), which makes them exceptionally trainable but also means they require consistent mental stimulation to prevent behavioral issues. Their intelligence allows them to excel in agility competitions and obedience training, but it also means they can become bored easily without proper engagement. Professional Grooming Requirements Brown poodles need professional grooming every 4 to 8 weeks to maintain their curly coat structure. Daily brushing sessions prevent matting and maintain healthy skin conditions. Owners should schedule baths every 3 to 6 weeks depending on activity levels and outdoor exposure. Many poodle owners choose shorter trims to minimize grooming challenges and reduce costs associated with frequent professional maintenance. Exercise and Training Demands These dogs require 30 to 60 minutes of vigorous daily exercise, including swimming and retrieving games that honor their water-retriever heritage. Their high energy levels and intelligence make them unsuitable for sedentary families who cannot provide adequate physical and mental exercise. Without sufficient physical and mental activity, poodles develop destructive behaviors and anxiety problems. Early socialization and positive reinforcement training methods work best with their independent nature, while their hypoallergenic coats benefit families with allergy concerns. Now that you understand what makes brown poodles special companions, you’ll want to know where to find these intelligent dogs available for adoption. Where to Find Brown Poodle Puppies for Adoption Local Animal Shelters Offer Your Best Starting Point Contact every animal shelter within a 50-mile radius of your home, as brown poodles appear less frequently than standard black or white varieties. The ASPCA reports that 23 million American households acquired a pet during the COVID-19 crisis, which increased competition for specific breeds. Call shelters weekly rather than rely on websites, since many facilities update their online listings slowly. Ask staff to notify you when poodles arrive, and consider expanding your search to include poodle mixes. Most shelters charge adoption fees between $100 to $500, which typically covers spaying, neutering, vaccinations, and microchipping. Breed-Specific Rescue Organizations Provide Expert Knowledge The Mid-Atlantic Poodle Rescue operates across multiple states and maintains extensive networks of foster families who care for poodles awaiting adoption. These specialized rescues often have waiting lists for brown poodles due to their popularity and limited availability (making patience essential for prospective adopters). Submit applications to multiple poodle rescues simultaneously, since approval processes can take weeks. Breed-specific rescues provide detailed health histories and temperament assessments that general shelters cannot offer. Online Platforms Expand Your Search Radius Use platforms like Petfinder and Adopt-a-Pet to filter searches specifically for poodles, but check these sites multiple times daily since desirable dogs get adopted quickly. These websites allow you to set up alerts for new brown poodle listings in your area and surrounding regions. Social media groups dedicated to poodle adoption also share available dogs before they appear on official websites (giving you an advantage over other potential adopters). Network Within the Poodle Community Connect with local poodle clubs and attend dog shows to network with rescue volunteers who know about upcoming adoptions. Volunteer at poodle rescues to build relationships and gain insider knowledge about available dogs. These connections often lead to early notifications about brown poodle puppies before they become publicly available. Once you locate potential adoption sources, you’ll need to prepare your home and finances for your new companion. Preparing for Brown Poodle Adoption Home Safety and Space Setup Install baby gates to create designated spaces for your brown poodle puppy, as they need boundaries while they adjust to their new environment. Secure all electrical cords, remove toxic plants like azaleas and tulips, and lock cabinets that contain cleaning supplies or medications. Purchase a 36 to 48-inch crate for standard poodle puppies, since they grow rapidly during their first year. Position the crate in a quiet area away from high-traffic zones but within sight of family activities. Financial Planning for Real Costs Adoption fees range from $100 to $500, but first-year expenses can be substantial for standard poodles. Professional grooming costs $75 to $150 every six weeks, which adds up to $650 annually. Quality dog food costs $600 to $800 per year for standard poodles, while veterinary care (including vaccinations, heartworm prevention, and routine check-ups) averages $800 to $1,200 annually. Pet insurance premiums range from $30 to $70 monthly depending on coverage levels and deductibles. Essential Supply Checklist Purchase stainless steel food and water bowls, a slicker brush for daily grooming, and high-quality puppy food recommended by the rescue organization. Buy a 6-foot leather leash, a properly fitted collar with ID tags, and interactive puzzle toys to challenge their intelligence. Stock up on enzymatic cleaners for accidents, puppy training pads, and dental chews designed for medium to large breeds. Required Documentation Gather your lease agreement or homeowner documentation, veterinary references from previous pets, and personal references as required by most rescue organizations. Many rescues require proof of stable housing and income verification before they approve adoption applications. Complete application forms thoroughly and submit them promptly, as brown poodles generate significant interest from potential adopters. Final Thoughts Brown poodle puppy adoption offers significant advantages over breeder purchases. Adoption fees typically cost $100 to $500 compared to breeder prices that range from $1,500 to $3,000. Rescue dogs often come spayed, neutered, and vaccinated, which saves hundreds in initial veterinary costs while you help reduce pet overpopulation. A brown poodle requires a 12 to 15-year commitment that includes daily exercise, regular grooming, and consistent training. These intelligent dogs need mental stimulation throughout their lives and can develop behavioral problems without proper engagement. Budget for ongoing expenses including professional grooming every six weeks, quality food, and annual veterinary care (which can total $2,000 yearly). Start your adoption journey by contacting local shelters and breed-specific rescues immediately. Submit applications to multiple organizations since brown poodles generate high demand. We at DogingtonPost support your adoption efforts with comprehensive dog care resources to help you succeed as a poodle parent.

MA Judge Rules Trump's Offshore Wind Ban 'Contrary to Law'

A portrait of a transgender-identifying former official of the Department of Health and Human Services now carries his biological name rather than his chosen identity.Rachel Levine is the first transgender-identifying person to be confirmed by the U.S. Senate and served as the assistant secretary of HHS in the Biden administration.'We remain committed to reversing harmful policies enacted by Levine and ensuring that biological reality guides our approach to public health.'Levine's portrait now reads, "Richard Levine," his birth name.HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon said in a statement that the decision was made in order to follow "gold-standard science.""Our priority is ensuring that the information presented internally and externally by HHS reflects gold-standard science," said Nixon. "We remain committed to reversing harmful policies enacted by Levine and ensuring that biological reality guides our approach to public health."A spokesperson for Levine called the decision "petty" and bigoted in a statement to NPR."During the federal shutdown, the current leadership of the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health changed Admiral Levine's photo to remove her current legal name and use a prior name," said Levine spokesperson Adrian Shanker.Shanker went on say it was an act "of bigotry against her."Other Democrats condemned the decision."Trump officials are so insecure they even erased Admiral Rachel Levine’s name from her own HHS portrait," responded Democratic Rep. Becca Balint of Vermont. "Instead of honoring a patriot who is serving this country, they’re busy stoking bigotry, while the rest of America pays the price."RELATED: Twitter suspends Tucker Carlson over 7-word tweet on transgender official Rachel Levine Levine was a prominent supporter of transition surgeries and interventions during his time at HHS."Gender-affirming care is medical care," he said in a 2023 statement. "Gender-affirming care is mental health care. Gender-affirming care is literally suicide prevention care."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Democratic Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker said a new bill he signed on Tuesday is intended to limit the "depravity" of the Trump administration, but government officials say it's unconstitutional.The law restricts federal immigration enforcement outside of state courthouses and allows residents to sue federal immigration agents if they believe their civil rights have been violated. It also restricts similar operations near hospitals, university campuses, and day-care centers. 'Dropping your kid off at day care, going to the doctor, or attending classes should not be a life-altering task.'"The idea that the Trump administration wants to prevent people from attending courts, doing their civic duty, and protecting public safety just boggles the mind," Pritzker said about the law.School officials are prohibited under the new law from reporting the immigration status of a student, employee, or another person associated with the student or employee."Today, I've signed into law legislation that expands legal protections for the people of Illinois," the governor wrote in a post on social media. "Dropping your kid off at day care, going to the doctor, or attending classes should not be a life-altering task. We will counter the Trump Administration's depravity."The Department of Homeland Security responded by accusing Pritzker of acting unconstitutionally against federal authority."Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution, still clearly states: 'This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof ... shall be the supreme Law of the Land,'" reads the statement on social media."By signing this law, @GovPritzker violated the Supremacy Clause," the department added. "We hope the headlines and social media likes are worth it."RELATED: Trump names liberal mayor and governor who 'should be in jail' A recent DHS report said that as many as 1,768 criminal non-citizens, which includes illegal immigrants and other residents, were released in Illinois despite ICE detainers placed on them. Among the released, there were at least five homicide convictions, 141 assault convictions, and 10 convictions for sexual offenses.Pritzker is considered by some to be a possible candidate for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

The U.S. military has seized an oil tanker off the coast of Venezuela, according to comments made by President Donald Trump.The president has warned government leaders of Venezuela that he would take action against narco-terrorists smuggling harmful drugs from the country into the U.S. Those actions have manifested in military strikes against alleged drug vessels in the Caribbean.'For multiple years, the oil tanker has been sanctioned by the United States due to its involvement in an illicit oil shipping network supporting foreign terrorist organizations.'"As you probably know, we've just seized a tanker on the coast of Venezuela," Trump said. "Large tanker, very large, largest one ever seized actually."Sources told ABC News that the tanker is referred to as a VLCC, or very large crude carrier, and can carry as many as 2 million barrels of oil.The president offered few details about the incident but said more information would be released soon."It was seized for a very good reason," he added.U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi offered more details in a statement on social media."Today, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Homeland Security Investigations, and the United States Coast Guard, with support from the Department of War, executed a seizure warrant for a crude oil tanker used to transport sanctioned oil from Venezuela and Iran," she wrote."For multiple years, the oil tanker has been sanctioned by the United States due to its involvement in an illicit oil shipping network supporting foreign terrorist organizations," she added. "This seizure, completed off the coast of Venezuela, was conducted safely and securely — and our investigation alongside the Department of Homeland Security to prevent the transport of sanctioned oil continues."She included video from the operation in the post.Also on Tuesday, the president said in an interview with Politico that Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro's days were numbered.RELATED: US strike against military targets in Venezuela could begin at any moment: Report Democrats have accused the administration of committing war crimes in the strikes on alleged drug-runners. In one incident, two survivors of a strike on a boat were killed by a second strike, which many have said was illegal.The Trump administration has put up a $50 million reward for the arrest of Maduro.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Mary Katharine Ham Roasts John Pavlovitz for Repugnant Erika Kirk Post