by Niamh Harris, The Peoples Voice: The former Prince, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has been accused of watching a young girl, aged between six and eight years old, being subjected to electric shock torture. An FBI report alleges that Andrew watched as the child was restrained on a table while being ‘tortured with electrical shocks’ by Ghislaine […]

from ZeroHedge: An Israeli television channel reported Thursday that the government’s Health Ministry convened an emergency session with hospital directors and major health funds to assess readiness for a possible escalation with Iran. According to i24 News, senior ministry officials attended the meeting and instructed hospital administrators to detail their level of preparedness in the event of a […]

There was much more to late Scottish singer Gerry Rafferty than Baker Street

A South Korean court has sentenced former President Yoon Suk-yeol to life in prison for leading an “insurrection” after he declared martial law and deployed military forces to block elected lawmakers from performing their constitutional duties. Martial Law Declaration Triggers Constitutional Crisis Yoon Suk-yeol declared martial law in December 2024, citing a “national emergency” amid allegations of electoral fraud. The conservative president deployed military forces to physically prevent National Assembly members from accessing the legislature. South Korea’s National Assembly quickly nullified the martial law order and passed an impeachment bill on December 14, 2024. The Constitutional Court immediately prioritized the case, beginning proceedings just two days later. This marked the first attempted martial law declaration since 1980, raising alarms about democratic backsliding in a nation still recovering from its authoritarian past. Court Rejects Presidential Immunity Defense Throughout hearings spanning January and February 2025, Yoon’s legal team attempted to invoke U.S.-style presidential immunity, citing the 2024 Trump v. United States Supreme Court decision. The Constitutional Court firmly rejected these arguments, with Justice Jeong Hyeong-sik—ironically a Yoon appointee—presiding over proceedings that examined surveillance footage and witness testimony. Former Defense Minister Kim Yong-hyun testified that he recommended martial law but denied ordering forces to storm the Assembly. The court ultimately ruled that Yoon committed “serious violations” including assembly interference, judicial pressure, and unauthorized intrusions into the National Election Commission offices. Criminal Trial Proceeds After Impeachment Upheld Following the Constitutional Court’s decision to uphold impeachment, South Korea held a snap election on June 3, 2025, which progressive candidate Lee Jae Myung won. Yoon’s criminal trial for insurrection began April 14, 2025, with prosecutors seeking accountability for what they characterized as an attempted coup against democratic institutions. The former president faces potential life imprisonment, though South Korea has maintained a moratorium on executions since 1997. Yoon’s defense team cited safety concerns and alleged media bias as reasons for his non-attendance at proceedings, arguments the court dismissed while admitting additional evidence from National Election Commission surveillance footage. Implications for Constitutional Governance This conviction strengthens precedents for holding executives accountable when they exceed constitutional authority. The case echoes the 2016-2017 impeachment of President Park Geun-hye for corruption, but Yoon’s deployment of military force against elected representatives represents a more severe threat to democratic institutions. The ruling clarifies that emergency powers cannot justify obstruction of legislative functions or deployment of armed forces against the people’s representatives. For Americans watching political polarization intensify globally, South Korea’s swift judicial response demonstrates how constitutional guardrails can function when courts prioritize institutional integrity over political allegiances, even when presiding justices were appointed by the accused. South Korean Court Sentences Former President Yoon Suk-yeol to Life in Prison for Leading “Insurrection” https://t.co/IOBFFKPTbu — The Gateway Pundit (@gatewaypundit) February 20, 2026 The trial outcome sends a clear message that military action against democratic institutions will result in severe consequences, regardless of claims about electoral fraud or national emergencies. This case may influence how other democracies address executive overreach, particularly regarding the limits of presidential immunity and the use of emergency powers to circumvent elected legislatures. Sources: Impeachment of Yoon Suk Yeol – Wikipedia

Dynomutt, Dog Wonder brought cheerful chaos to Saturday mornings, pairing a straight‑laced hero with a lovable mechanical sidekick whose gadget misfires turned every mission into a bright, unforgettable blend of action and comedy. The post Saturday Morning Memories: Dynomutt, Dog Wonder appeared first on The Retro Network.

And why the nipple might be our best bet.

Nearly half of Americans now refuse to identify as either Democrat or Republican. According to a recent Gallup poll, independents make up a record 45% of the electorate, yet our political system continues to operate as though this plurality doesn’t exist — until now.Both major political parties are facing widespread public dissatisfaction, with 58% of Americans viewing the Republican Party unfavorably and 61% expressing unfavorable views of the Democratic Party. As confidence in the parties erodes, 2026 is shaping up to be the year that we see a handful of independents elected to Congress, disrupting the balance of power in Washington.Independents need only three to five seats to fundamentally transform American politics.For politically homeless voters, this moment calls for supporting credible independent candidates where they can actually win, especially in congressional districts where neither party is delivering for its constituents.While the Gallup poll shows the increase in independent self-identification metrics, which have been sitting at around 40% since 2011, there is a convergence of two major trends that make this moment in politics ripe for independents.The first major trend is the rise of Millennials and Gen Z as a central voting bloc. 2026 will be an election in which younger Americans make up a sizeable portion of the electorate, with projections currently holding that Millennials and Gen Z will account for over half of voters by 2028.Millennials are now well into their 30s, many serving in executive and senior leadership roles in politics and business, including prominent voices such as Vice President JD Vance and New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani (D). Together, Millennials and Gen Z are becoming one of the most influential forces in the electorate.Unlike their predecessors, these two generations are far more likely to identify as independent. Many have never belonged to a political party in the first place. Younger independents are focused on issues like affordability, which both parties are failing to address. They gravitate toward candidates from either party who appear to be invested in their issues.The second trend is the broader integration of AI systems into everyday life — including politics. AI is the great leveler, much like the printing press fundamentally altered information systems and power structures centuries ago. It will be a game-changer in a similar way, and it’s a major reason why an independent movement in 2026 can make more progress than past efforts.RELATED: Republicans and Democrats are in revolt — for very different reasons Douglas Rissing/Getty ImagesThe two-party system, like the taxi industry before Uber disrupted it, represents an entrenched but flawed model that has resisted reform. AI provides the tools to completely bypass the old system, rather than slowly reforming it from the inside. Technology now democratizes campaign infrastructure, voter outreach, and message distribution pathways for alternatives that were previously impossible without massive institutional backing.Americans are hungry for more options at the ballot box. We can customize what we watch, what we drive, even which type of peanut butter sits on our shelves. Yet when it comes to politics, those options narrow dramatically. As the two major parties continue to struggle to meet the moment, voters’ appetite for credible alternatives is only growing stronger.In the private sector, we would call it a clear product-market fit. If there were two brands that people clearly rejected, competition would naturally emerge in the market. The same logic applies to politics. Recent polling from the Independent Center Voice discovered that 76% of voters would likely vote for “strong, well-funded independent candidate.”For far too long, the conversation among independents has fixated on electing a third-party candidate to the White House. They’ll find more luck channeling their dissatisfaction, frustration, and growing disillusionment toward Congress, where institutional change is more enduring. It’s in congressional races — not presidential ones — that the independent movement will be felt first.Independents need only three to five seats to fundamentally transform American politics. With growing concentrations of independent and “no party preference” voters across key districts, the foundation for change is already in place.The real question is no longer whether the independent movement will arrive, but whether the political system is prepared to respond.Editor’s note: This article was originally published by RealClearPolitics and made available via RealClearWire.