If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The European Union pulled the trigger on Elon Musk’s social media platform X. On Friday, Brussels fined X a massive $140 million for what it described as “transparency failures” under its censorship law, the Digital Services Act. In plain terms, the EU is angry that X is not policing speech the way it wants. Of course, officials insist the penalty is not about censorship. It is about “accountability.” Yet every part of the fine print points to the same thing: a government demanding more control over what people say and see online. The European Commission called X’s blue check system “deceptive” because Musk turned what used to be a verification badge into a paid feature anyone can buy. In the eyes of Brussels, that is chaos, a marketplace where speech is treated like a right, not a licensed activity. Henna Virkkunen, the Commission’s executive vice president for tech sovereignty, summed up the mood. “Deceiving users with blue check marks, obscuring information on ads, and shutting out researchers have no place online in the E.U.,” she said. “We are holding X responsible for undermining users’ rights and evading accountability.” European regulators also accuse X of not sharing advertising data and refusing to give researchers access to its user information. The law says platforms must open up to “independent research.” In reality, that means academics and NGOs, often with pro-censorship political affiliations, getting privileged access to social data, exactly the kind of surveillance the DSA claims to prevent. Officials call this “transparency.” It is a transparency that flows one way, upward, toward the state. Musk’s decision not to hand over user data now counts as a punishable offense. When asked to explain how they calculated the €120 million penalty, the Commission offered a masterpiece of vagueness about “proportionality” and “the nature of the infringements.” The only clear metric seems to be how defiant a company is about following orders. From Washington, the outrage came fast. “The EU should be supporting free speech, not attacking American companies over garbage,” said Vice President JD Vance. Musk responded with his usual brevity: “Much appreciated.” In the same breath that Brussels punished X, it closed an investigation into TikTok without a fine. TikTok, after all, promised to “cooperate” and adjust its design. “If you comply with our rules, you don’t get a fine,” Virkkunen told reporters. That sentence could serve as the EU’s motto. Compliance equals peace. Free speech costs money. The European Union has moved beyond suggesting rules for online speech and is now issuing orders. American social media platforms are facing a steady increase in censorship demands from Brussels, framed as “transparency” and “safety” obligations. Each new regulation adds another layer of political oversight, turning what used to be private platforms into instruments of European policy. The DSA sits at the center of this system. The law forces companies like Meta, Google, and X to remove “harmful” content, grant access to internal data, and submit regular reports on how they handle information deemed risky by regulators. None of these terms have clear definitions, which gives officials the freedom to decide what speech is acceptable after the fact. In effect, the EU has built a structure that allows censorship by procedure rather than decree. US companies are learning that “transparency” now means constant surveillance from European regulators and activist groups. The enforcement process rewards compliance, not innovation. Platforms that fail to align with the EU’s preferred moderation standards face public scolding and multi-million-dollar fines. Those who comply end up filtering speech to avoid further punishment. This has turned into a quiet export of European political culture. The EU’s rhetoric about “accountability” and “responsibility” conceals a growing ambition to shape global online discourse. If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The post EU Fines Elon Musk’s X $140 Million Amid Free Speech Clash appeared first on Reclaim The Net.

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. US consular officers have been directed to screen foreign tech workers for any record of silencing lawful expression before granting them H-1B visas, according to a newly circulated State Department cable obtained this week. The order, part of a broader tightening of immigration oversight, tells officials to reject applicants linked to online content control or the policing of political speech. The guidance, distributed to all US embassies on December 2, according to Reuters, marks the first time Washington has explicitly tied visa eligibility to involvement in censorship or the restriction of constitutionally protected expression. It instructs consular staff to examine résumés and professional profiles, particularly LinkedIn accounts, for signs that an applicant or accompanying family member has worked in fields like misinformation response, fact-checking, compliance, or online safety. “If you uncover evidence an applicant was responsible for, or complicit in, censorship or attempted censorship of protected expression in the United States, you should pursue a finding that the applicant is ineligible,” the cable said, citing the Immigration and Nationality Act. The H-1B program, used by US companies to hire what are meant to be skilled professionals from abroad, is a big part of the technology industry. Many firms dependent on it have extensive workforces from India in particular, making the new instructions particularly relevant to Silicon Valley. The document singles out applicants in social media and financial services, sectors it says have played roles “in the suppression of protected expression.” “You must thoroughly explore their employment histories to ensure no participation in such activities,” consular officers were told. The rules apply equally to first-time and returning visa seekers. A State Department spokesperson confirmed that the US opposes admitting foreign nationals who engage in restricting American speech. “We do not support aliens coming to the United States to work as censors muzzling Americans,” the spokesperson said. They added that the President’s own experience of being locked out of social media accounts shaped his insistence that “allowing foreigners to lead this type of censorship would both insult and injure the American people.” In May, Secretary Marco Rubio warned that individuals involved in “censoring speech by Americans” could face visa bans, a threat he suggested might even apply to foreign regulators overseeing US tech platforms. If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The post US Orders Visa Screening of Foreign Tech Workers Involved in Online Censorship appeared first on Reclaim The Net.

Oh, Here's News - Taliban Actually Using That Stuff POTATUS Abandoned During the Skeedaddle

We have all the latest images of our interstellar visitor from ESA's Juice, Hubble, NASA's STEREO, and even a photobomb from PUNCH.

Nope, they're not weather sensors.

This queen lived her best life, despite her zig-zagging neck.

Bondi should try to persuade her headstrong boss that enough is enough.

Jesse Kelly Points to Sen. Schumer's Outrage As Proof Hegseth Threatens More Than Just Narco Terrorists

SURE: CNN ROASTED for Claiming J6 Pipe Bomb Suspect (Who They Said Was White) Thought Election Was Stolen

FBI Official Who Oversaw Targeting of Catholics Lands Sweet New Gig – Thanks to This Democrat