It can even boost your home value. READ MORE...

Three singers on this list have eight kids, while one country mama has nine. Continue reading…

Suicidal ideation, drug dealing and abuse, pornography addiction, crippling anxiety and unforgiveness.  Those are just some of the wrenching problems a group of pastors and ministers personally endured before their Christian faith healed them.  Armed with these experiences, these leaders over the past two years have guided more than 100,000 college students nationwide in how faith in Jesus can also heal Gen Z, a generation wrestling with record depression and other mental illnesses.  The story of these college gatherings, led by students and organized through a nonprofit called UniteUS, will be unveiled in a new documentary called “The Revival Generation,” premiering at the Kennedy Center for Performing Arts in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday.  The film, directed by Laura Hand, founder of Handwritten Studios, is produced by Christian Broadcasting Network’s Abigail Robertson. “The media paints Gen Z as broken and lost, but what I saw on campuses was the opposite,” Hand told The Daily Signal. “We hear endless headlines about chaos and division, but almost nothing about the unity and faith spreading among students. I knew it was a story that needed to be told because the strength of our nation depends on the strength of our young people.” “The Revival Generation” film has been endorsed by the Trump administration, which is taking a hands-on approach to reshaping the cultural powerhouse that is the Kennedy Center. “In the early 1900s, my mom’s family was part of the Azusa Street revival in Los Angeles which helped ignite the Jesus movement of the 1970s,” Ambassador Richard Grenell, president of the Kennedy Center, said in a press statement. “Today, we are on the cusp of another exciting revival in America and this film premiere at our nation’s cultural center highlights some of those beginnings.” The documentary also features comments from Dr. Ben Carson, secretary of housing and urban development during the first Trump administration.  “The Revival Generation” shares the story of UniteUs founder Tonya Prewett, a loving mother of three members of Gen Z who felt ignited by concern for one of her daughters, who almost died and landed in jail for drunk driving. Prewett’s daughter shares on camera her struggle with alcoholism and her mother’s unconditional, Christlike love through her shame and suicidal ideation while in jail. Burdened by her daughter’s pain and Gen Z’s technology-infused anxieties, Prewett envisioned a series of gatherings for Christian evangelism, not unlike Billy Graham’s famous revivals from generations ago. Seasoned author and Bible teacher Jennie Allen, one of the UniteUS ministers, is shown throughout the film joining with pastor Jonathan “JP” Pokluda, to mentor and baptize thousands of students at the revival gatherings, which began Sept. 12, 2023, with 6,000 students at Auburn University’s Neville Arena.  Since then, students have invited UniteUs onto numerous campuses including Ohio State University, Florida State, University of Mississippi, Purdue, University of Alabama, and the University of Georgia. In September, UniteUs will land in Oklahoma, Phoenix, Cincinnati, Tennessee and University of South Florida in Tampa. Prior to the large stadium gathering with bright stage lights and music from viral contemporary worship groups like Elevation Rhythm, UniteUs connects with local pastors and campus ministry leaders in each community, bringing them in to set up tables outside the event so students can get connected that night. This ensures that the commitment made amid the glitz and glamour of the thunderous applause and bright lights in the arenas during an emotional night isn’t just a flash in a pan.  Partnerships with the local and campus churches ensure the students get plugged into their local church, with many reporting they’re now serving at their church or leading small groups or discipleship programs—continuing in their faith walk. In the film, Allen powerfully challenges a dusty stereotype that church is a place where people dress in their finest, putting up fake, shiny facades of perfectionism while secretly deeply mired in pain, sin and doubt. This inauthenticity fails with Gen Z.  Allen poignantly calls for Christians to treat church as a hospital, a place for recovering sinners who encounter Jesus, the “Divine Physician,” who heals souls and binds wounds. She’s absolutely right.This is how a lost generation is found. “The Revival Generation” will be available for streaming and DVD on Thursday, Aug. 28, 2025. We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal. The post ‘The Revival Generation” Film Debuting at Kennedy Center Shows Gen Z Embracing Christian Faith  appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Whether on social media or in elected office, Democrats these days cannot seem to get out of their own way. Monday on the social media platform X, for instance, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced that he would instruct Texas schools to "display the Ten Commandments in accordance with Texas...

In the world of motorcycles, where enthusiasts constantly seek to push boundaries and create unique rides that reflect their personal […] The post Laurel Classics’ Custom Harley-Davidson XR1000 – The Beast appeared first on Hot Bike Magazine.

Riding the only running 1905 Harley Davidson

When you run a website called WLT Report, you might expect that on a large, large majority of issues we are completely in-line with President Trump. By the way, you do know WLT stands for “We Love Trump” and stems from my prior site called WeLoveTrump.com, right? Introducing…WLT Report! [From Noah] So while we aim to be critical thinkers and not just sycophants, critical thinking leads us to supporting and agreeing with President Trump's actions in most situations and our reporting reflects that. And I have learned that even when things might look questionable on the surface, usually there's a very good reason for why President Trump is doing what he's doing the more you look into it. It's easy to armchair quarterback and no one is above tough questions, but I've also learned long ago that President Trump is privy to VAST amounts more of information that we have on the outside looking in, and I've come to trust that he's going to make the best decision he can based on all of that information -- some of which I may not have. That all said, this is one of those topics that on the surface looks, well....just plain wrong. Because yesterday President Trump announced he is bringing in 600,000 Chinese students into the US. Watch here: NOW - Trump says he'll allow 600,000 Chinese students into the U.S. pic.twitter.com/8h0S9O1Ib6 — Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) August 25, 2025 On the surface, it's hard to see how this is good for MAGA... How does this Make America Great exactly? It seems like it does two things, neither of which are good.  First, it takes up 600,000 seats at colleges and universities that will NOT go to American students.  That's just math and reality.  How is that good? Your kid who might have a 4.0 GPA and was born here and wants to go to school for engineering is suddenly facing 600,000 Chinese students who want his seat?  Really? Second, it seems to only enrich the Ivy League institutions that have made very clear they hate America. These elite hellhole institutions are no different than any other business -- they need customers to stay in business and President Trump just gifted them 600,000 new customers.  Why? I guess there's also a third item...there's no guarantee this group isn't loaded with Chinese Spies.  In fact, it's almost guaranteed that some number of Chinese Spies are coming into the US with this program, perhaps a number much larger than you might expect. So while I trust President Trump and give him wide benefit of the doubt, this one is hard to understand. Laura Ingraham also found it perplexing and she pushed Howard Lutnick on the topic last night on her show.  I note that Lutnick tried to offer an explanation that really didn't make any sense, Ingraham pushed again, and Lutnick essentially admitted he had no answer. Watch for yourself: BREAKING: Fox's Laura Ingraham is GRILLING Howard Lutnick on how allowing 600K Chinese students into the United States is "America First?" "With all due respect, how is allowing 600K students from the Communist country of China putting America first?" "But why are you… pic.twitter.com/bvb9XqPqRU — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) August 25, 2025 TRANSCRIPT: It's very important. Uh, Mr. Secretary, with all due respect, how is allowing 600,000 students from the communist country of China putting America first? Well, the president's point of view is that what would happen if you didn't have those 600,000 students is that you'd empty them from the top. All the students would go up to better schools, and the bottom 15% of universities and colleges would go out of business in America. So his view is he's taking a rational economic view, which is classic Donald Trump, looking at higher education and saying—But why are you helping Harvard? "Until we modify that." That just helps Harvard and UCLA and UC Berkeley, and that means you're all helping those schools. Why? They're like the pro—you know, basically factories of anti-American propaganda, and now they're getting a big influx of cash because of the Chinese students. I mean, I know President Trump has always been very pro–Chinese student, I just don't understand it for the life of me. Those are 600,000 spots that American kids won't get. Well, I'll tell you what I'm involved in. I'm involved in changing the H-1B program, right? We're gonna change that program— Oh, that's a scam. —because that's terrible, right? We're gonna change the green card. You know, we give green cards. The average American makes $75,000 a year and the average green card recipient $66,000. So we're taking the bottom quartile. All right. Like why are we doing that? That's why Donald Trump is gonna change it. That's the gold card that's coming, and that's—we're gonna start picking the best people to come into this country. I know. It's time for that to change. I think our American engineering students need to be given the first role at every job, and I think they're brilliant when given half a chance. But, Mr. Secretary, I know you're juggling a lot of balls over there. We really appreciate your explaining a lot of this to us. Thank you. Backup here if needed with captions added: MAGA MISFIRE? President Trump To Flooding USA With 600,000 Chinese Students pic.twitter.com/N2RTPlYM4X — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) August 26, 2025 What do you think?

President Trump has faced some pretty vocal criticism over the past 24 hours, some even coming from his base, over a couple issues. The first was this: MAGA MISFIRE? President Trump To Flooding USA With 600,000 Chinese Students And the second was this: President Trump Signs Executive Order BANNING American Flag Burning — Severe Penalty! On the second topic, the general criticism goes like this:  "I definitely don't support burning the American flag, but that is free speech protected by the First Amendment and the Supreme Court has already made that clear long ago!" Let's talk about that... And I want to start with a hat tip from my friend Shawn Farash who suggested anyone spouting the take written above should go and read the Executive Order first before commenting: I have no problem with Trump's Flag Burning EO because I read the text of Trump's Flag Burning EO. Thank you for your attention to this matter. — Shawn Farash (@Shawn_Farash) August 26, 2025 Great advice Shawn! I would venture to guess that 99% of people criticizing President Trump over this issue have not read the EO, so let's do that together shall we? From WhiteHouse.gov, here is the full text: PROSECUTING BURNING OF THE AMERICAN FLAG August 25, 2025 By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered: Section 1.  Purpose.  Our great American Flag is the most sacred and cherished symbol of the United States of America, and of American freedom, identity, and strength.  Over nearly two-and-a-half centuries, many thousands of American patriots have fought, bled, and died to keep the Stars and Stripes waving proudly.  The American Flag is a special symbol in our national life that should unite and represent all Americans of every background and walk of life.  Desecrating it is uniquely offensive and provocative.  It is a statement of contempt, hostility, and violence against our Nation — the clearest possible expression of opposition to the political union that preserves our rights, liberty, and security.  Burning this representation of America may incite violence and riot.  American Flag burning is also used by groups of foreign nationals as a calculated act to intimidate and threaten violence against Americans because of their nationality and place of birth. Notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s rulings on First Amendment protections, the Court has never held that American Flag desecration conducted in a manner that is likely to incite imminent lawless action or that is an action amounting to “fighting words” is constitutionally protected.  See Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397, 408-10 (1989). My Administration will act to restore respect and sanctity to the American Flag and prosecute those who incite violence or otherwise violate our laws while desecrating this symbol of our country, to the fullest extent permissible under any available authority. Sec. 2.  Measures to Combat Desecration of the American Flag.  (a)  The Attorney General shall prioritize the enforcement to the fullest extent possible of our Nation’s criminal and civil laws against acts of American Flag desecration that violate applicable, content-neutral laws, while causing harm unrelated to expression, consistent with the First Amendment.  This may include, but is not limited to, violent crimes; hate crimes, illegal discrimination against American citizens, or other violations of Americans’ civil rights; and crimes against property and the peace, as well as conspiracies and attempts to violate, and aiding and abetting others to violate, such laws. (b)  In cases where the Department of Justice or another executive department or agency (agency) determines that an instance of American Flag desecration may violate an applicable State or local law, such as open burning restrictions, disorderly conduct laws, or destruction of property laws, the agency shall refer the matter to the appropriate State or local authority for potential action. (c)  To the maximum extent permitted by the Constitution, the Attorney General shall vigorously prosecute those who violate our laws in ways that involve desecrating the American Flag, and may pursue litigation to clarify the scope of the First Amendment exceptions in this area. (d)  The Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting within their respective authorities, shall deny, prohibit, terminate, or revoke visas, residence permits, naturalization proceedings, and other immigration benefits, or seek removal from the United States, pursuant to Federal law, including 8 U.S.C. 1182(a), 8 U.S.C. 1424, 8 U.S.C. 1427, 8 U.S.C. 1451(c), and 8 U.S.C. 1227(a), whenever there has been an appropriate determination that foreign nationals have engaged in American Flag-desecration activity under circumstances that permit the exercise of such remedies pursuant to Federal law. Sec. 3.  Severability.  If any provision of this order, or the application of any provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be invalid, the remainder of this order and the application of its provisions to any other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby. Sec. 4.  General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect: (i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or (ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals. (b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations. (c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. (d)  The costs for publication of this order shall be borne by the Department of Justice. DONALD J. TRUMP THE WHITE HOUSE, August 25, 2025. So what do we notice? Immediately we notice that the Executive Order acknowledges and speaks directly to prior Supreme Court protections for flag burning and free speech, and this EO specifically says it is not aimed as those situations. The text of the EO specifically notes it is intended to address only those situations where "American Flag desecration conducted in a manner that is likely to incite imminent lawless action or that is an action amounting to 'fighting words'". In other words, it is completely legal and recognizes in its very text that sanctity of the First Amendment and Supreme Court Rulings on free speech. Case closed.