Late on Thursday night, President Donald Trump signed an executive order to cut taxpayer funds to PBS and NPR through the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. The text was posted on the Trump team’s “Rapid Response 47” account on X. It said: “@POTUS just signed an executive order ENDING the taxpayer subsidization of NPR and PBS — which receive millions from taxpayers to spread radical, woke propaganda disguised as ‘news.’” The executive order includes this argument: Unlike in 1967, when the CPB was established, today the media landscape is filled with abundant, diverse, and innovative news options. Government funding of news media in this environment is not only outdated and unnecessary but corrosive to the appearance of journalistic independence. At the very least, Americans have the right to expect that if their tax dollars fund public broadcasting at all, they fund only fair, accurate, unbiased, and nonpartisan news coverage. Since PBS and NPR are funded by all the American people, it should reflect the viewpoints of the people, and instead, after Trump was re-elected, both networks have doubled down in their anti-Trump animus. This was the top of the NPR home page on Thursday morning:    PBS News Hour marked the first 100 days of Trump with White House correspondent Laura Barron-Lopez quoting federal judges slamming Trump for a "path of perfect lawlessness" and bringing in leftist historian Mark Updegrove to proclaim "Donald Trump campaigned on the notion of making America great again. We have seen him tear down much of what has made America great to this point." Earlier this week, the CPB sued Trump over his move to fire three members of its five-person board that were Democrats appointed by President Biden.  The Trump administration has been working to defund the U.S. Agency for Global Media, including Voice of America and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, which were founded to provide unbiased broadcast news coverage for people inside totalitarian regimes, but now sound more like NPR. You can tell, because liberal media outlets have presented them as journalistic heroes. Federal judges have ruled against some of these efforts, finding that funds were already appropriated by Congress. The White House was expected to send a request to Congress this week that they rescind forward funding for the CPB, which has been given $535 million a year to provide a taxpayer-funded TV and radio equivalent to MSNBC. The order demands an end of their taxpayer funding not just through CPB, but through :all executive departments and agencies," since public broadcasting entities have received grants through the Department of Education, the National Endowment for the Humanities, and other federal sources.

The Supreme Court heard arguments on April 30 on whether a Catholic school in Oklahoma named for St. Isidore the Farmer can be the first charter school with a religious foundation. It’s the latest case to alarm the media about the so-called “separation of church and state.” New York Times legal reporter Adam Liptak cited a study finding that since Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court in 2005, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of religious people and groups over 83 percent of the time, compared with about 50 percent of the time for other courts since 1953. “In most of these cases, the winning religion was a mainstream Christian organization, whereas in the past pro-religion outcomes more frequently favored minority or marginal religious organizations,” two professors concluded. This underlines how the Left fears “mainstream Christians” are going to ruin public education. On CBS Evening News, Oklahoma’s Republican Attorney General Gentner Drummond was so aggressive about touting a “slippery slope” of allowing Christians to have charter schools, he claimed it would open the door to “Satanic School” and “Wiccan School.” In reality, many public school teachers today preach the polar opposite of “mainstream Christian” values, but that’s never something that liberal reporters think should be separate from the state. Take a look at the LGBTQ-pushing teachers sporting purple hair featured on “Libs of Tik Tok.” You can put up rainbow flags on the wall, but you can’t put up a cross. You can’t “establish” religion, but you can establish its godless opposite. A week earlier, when the high court took up Maryland’s Montgomery County removing any parental choice in opting out students during discussions of illustrated children’s books like Pride Puppy and Uncle Bobby's [Gay] Wedding. Liptak found two professors who argued “The First Amendment does not shield public school students from the mere exposure to ideas that conflict with their personal views, whether secular or religious.” How does Liptak reconcile these two arguments about public schools? It would seem that introducing Catholic views is a dangerous intrusion, but introducing the LGBTQ advocacy is merely “inclusion.” If a religious parent showed up in the grade-school classroom to add a little balance to the discussion, they wouldn’t welcome that as “the mere exposure of ideas” some find disagreeable. At least reporters can clearly label the two sides of this debate. On NBC Nightly News, legal reporter Laura Jarrett (daughter of Obama’s White House chief of staff Valerie Jarrett) touted the views of Oklahoma’s Erin Brewer, as just a “mom of two teens.” Brewer argued “For the government to choose a particular religion to force us as taxpayers to fund it or to force us as students to study those tenets, that's un-American.” Jarrett didn’t tell viewers that Brewer was a losing Democrat candidate for the Oklahoma state senate in 2024. Brewer, like many liberal journalists, decries the spread of “Christian nationalism” and campaigned against Oklahoma superintendent of schools Ryan Walters, who has touted bringing the Bible back into public schools. Secular reporters often betray that their minds meld with Ron Reagan Jr. and the Freedom From Religion Foundation. “Freedom” is about keeping religion out of the public square, while the opposing view gets untrammeled promotion. “Freedom” also somehow means preventing parents from opting out on the propaganda, and calling that a lesson in “civility and respect.” That’s Orwellian. 

President Trump’s approval declined after he announced broad tariffs not just on China but on trading partners who, in his opinion, take advantage of America with their tariffs on American goods. Yet…

By Gloria Ogbonna George Simion, the frontrunner in Romania’s presidential election, has declared in an exclusive interview with Breitbart News that his potential victory, alongside a like-minded conservative…

By Blessing Nweke Ten people, including four children, were killed and more than 30 others injured when a passenger bus collided with multiple vehicles at a toll gate on the Subic-Clark-Tarlac Expressway…

The late Pope Francis was the least favorite pope of American conservatives. In 2020, when Francis published an encyclical a month before the U.S. election, he seemed to be playing to his part as “the…

There's a spiritual cause and effect ratio that says the longer I ignore God, the greater the speed bump.

Exclusive: David Icke Part III: Trump, The Third Temple & The Anti-Christ - April 29, 2025 Stew Peters Network - FAIR USE FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES Mirrored From: https://rumble.com/c/StewPeters https://rumble.com/v6sqfqv-exclusive-david-icke-part-iii-trump-the-third-temple-and-the-anti-christ.html

He speaks facts on this subject & on the climate scam. He would make a fantastic Prime Minister & more & more you get people are voting for him #auspol25 #Election2025

"It still brings tears to my eyes."