A new legal battle is erupting as America First Legal takes aim at federal health agencies over alleged race-based organ transplant criteria. The group accuses the Biden administration of pushing DEI policies that could determine who lives and who dies—not based on need, but on identity. Legal Fight for Transparency America First Legal (AFL), founded by former Trump adviser Stephen Miller, has filed a lawsuit demanding answers from the Biden administration. The target? DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) policies allegedly influencing organ transplant allocation. AFL’s suit names the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), and Health Resources and Services Administration—all accused of withholding records. The group argues that a colorblind, medical-based system is under threat from politically motivated race-based preferences. After a failed FOIA request in 2023, AFL is turning to the courts, insisting that Americans deserve to know whether life-saving organs are being rationed based on ideology, not urgency. Race vs. Need? AFL warns that “equity” policies could warp transplant criteria by giving racial and ethnic factors undue influence over objective medical need. While CMS claims it’s working to improve fairness and access to transplants, AFL says the administration has “infected” the system with race-conscious decision-making. /1BREAKING — AFL just SUED HHS, CMS, and HRSA to expose an ILLEGAL Biden-era plan to give out organ transplants based on RACE and ETHNICITY — not medical need. DEI in healthcare is DEADLY. pic.twitter.com/qMgo4cvOk8 — America First Legal (@America1stLegal) July 2, 2025 “The Biden Administration infected the federal government with ‘equity,’ replacing traditional principles of fairness and need with race-conscious criteria.” — Will Scolinos, AFL Counsel President Biden’s Executive Order 13985, signed in 2021, mandates all agencies to address barriers for “underserved communities.” But critics argue that in the life-and-death world of organ transplants, such policies can lead to dangerous consequences—where identity trumps medical urgency. The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher With thousands of Americans on transplant waiting lists, AFL says this fight is about preserving trust in the fairness of the healthcare system. The group is calling for full disclosure from the administration and a return to merit-based criteria that save lives—regardless of race, gender, or political pressure. MAGA law group fights to expose how Biden's DEI agenda may have tainted life-saving organ transplants https://t.co/tTuB61RfAd — Fox News (@FoxNews) July 2, 2025 “We want transparency. We want fairness. And we want to make sure critical health decisions aren’t being hijacked by ideology.” — America First Legal As this lawsuit unfolds, it taps into a larger national debate about how far DEI should go—and whether it belongs in life-or-death decisions at all. Sources: HHS Faces Lawsuit over Race-Based Organ Transplant Reforms Under Biden MAGA law group fights to expose how Biden’s DEI agenda may have tainted life-saving organ transplants

When Mark Zuckerberg was abruptly asked to leave the Oval Office, insiders say it was no accident. The high-profile snub marks a turning point in the cold war between tech giants and the political forces determined to rein them in. Escorted Out: Tech Meets Turbulence Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg was abruptly asked to leave the Oval Office during a recent White House meeting, in what insiders are calling a symbolic clash between tech overreach and government accountability. The reason? Zuckerberg reportedly lacked security clearance and appeared uninvited during a classified discussion about military defense platforms. Zuck outside the White House like:“Hey guys… heard you’re in the market for a new socially awkward billionaire?” pic.twitter.com/yUqWvpzCPO — Sovey (@sovey_X) June 5, 2025 Sources say his presence derailed a briefing on the Air Force’s next-gen fighter jet program. The optics: a tech titan stepping into a room meant for national defense, only to be shown the door. Lobbying, Fines, and the FTC Fight Zuckerberg didn’t just drop by for coffee. He’s been aggressively lobbying behind the scenes, allegedly spending millions to influence President Trump and avoid both FTC fines and the forced breakup of Meta. At the heart of the battle are Instagram and WhatsApp—acquisitions now under fire from regulators who claim they’ve given Meta unchecked control over social media. BREAKING: Mark Zuckerberg wants to become part of the DOGE team. Do you trust Mark Zuckerberg? YES or NO? pic.twitter.com/7lrCwOHgnC — Commentary Elon Musk (@ElonMuskNews47) June 26, 2025 The FTC, still pursuing the case years later, argues Meta’s dominance was on “full display in 2020” and calls for major structural changes. Zuckerberg, meanwhile, has been relentless, insiders say, in attempts to get the case dropped. His push to align with the Trump administration, including hiring Republican insider Joel Kaplan, is seen as a clear pivot from his earlier liberal alliances. Big Tech vs. the Oval Office Zuckerberg’s ejection is more than procedural—it’s symbolic. It exposes a deepening distrust of Big Tech from both political camps. Trump-era officials have increasingly challenged Meta’s influence, especially after revelations about censorship, political bias, and shadow-banning. White House denies Mark Zuckerberg was ‘asked to leave’ Oval Office meeting about F-47 fighter jet https://t.co/PhWLIgFtJ8 pic.twitter.com/YEjbU2TtYT — New York Post (@nypost) July 2, 2025 “Relentless in trying to get the case dropped,” said one White House official—underscoring the pressure campaign Zuckerberg waged behind closed doors. Meta’s attempts to rewrite its public image haven’t gone unnoticed. From sudden support for free speech reforms to policy rollbacks seen as more conservative-friendly, critics call it “too little, too late.” Sources: ‘Maga Mark’ Zuckerberg unceremoniously kicked out of Oval Office after White House tour | Daily Mail Online ‘Maga Mark’ Zuckerberg unceremoniously kicked out of Oval Office after White House tour

'Disgusting, pervert, female abuser'

Liberals really hate it when you say they hate America. Some of them prove it. Some of them make strange arguments about how they love Cherry Pop-Tarts and McDonald's, so of course they love America. Managing Editor Curtis Houck took exception to a Washington Post column about how liberals love America, too -- or things about America. That's missing the patriotic point. Monica Hesse has a new column headlined  Trump’s lazy insult for liberals is deeply confusing. “These people hate our country,” says Trump. But she loves Pop-Tarts.... I also love McDonald’s. I love Thanksgiving Day parades and Fourth of July pool parties. Mission: Impossible movies and John Grisham novels. Holiday Inn Expresses and my hometown’s annual Corn Festival…     But she said this: "This has become a central political division in our country. The right accuses the left of hating the United States; the left responds that protest is American." We know that journalists don’t like wearing flag pins or saying the Pledge of Allegiance at the white house. But they often have a problem with the concept of patriotism in general. They associated it with jingoism, the use of patriotism to push for endless wars. Hesse complained:  "There’s no point to a stupid argument about whether you or I love America more than Trump or a bunch of Fox hosts do."  But loving America is about loving the founding ideas of America, of democracy and liberty, even if these ideas weren't fully put into practice for many years. Pledging allegiance to the flag isn't suggesting the country has always been perfect. It's about allegiance to the country through thick and thin. Journalists have said some vicious things about displays of patriotism. In 2003, PBS host Bill Moyers uncorked one:  “I decided to put on my flag pin tonight…I put it on to take it back. The flag’s been hijacked and turned into a logo – the trademark of a monopoly on patriotism….When I see flags sprouting on official lapels, I think of the time in China when I saw Mao’s Little Red Book on every official’s desk, omnipresent and unread.” That’s especially gross, comparing flag-pin wearers to Chinese commie mass murderers. In 2007, Bill Moyers was at it again on PBS, saying the Pledge of Allegiance is a LIE:  "The next time you say the Pledge of Allegiance….Remember, it's a lie, a whopper of a lie. We coax it from the mouths of babes for the same reason our politicians wear their flag pins on their lapels. It makes the hypocrisy go down easier." Moyers went on to talk about executions of murderers, Rickey Ray Rector in Bill Clinton's Arkansas and Karla Faye Tucker in George W. Bush's Texas. It's a little weird to think the Pledge is somehow about... the death penalty? In addition, we chat about Alex Christy's latest late-night study, which found the guests of these talk shows lean dramatically. There were 106 liberal guests to one conservative. Among partisan officials, it was 30 to zero. As our Rich Noyes tweeted, “Republicans control the White House, Senate and House, but Dems control late night TV by a 30-to-zero margin.” Stephen Colbert on CBS was the most aggressive, with 14 left-wing pols and 29 woke celebrities and journalists. People still watching that show know what to expect. It sounds more like a Democrat precinct meeting than a bubbly comedy hour. We also discuss the latest on defamation suits against the network, including Gavin Newsom's new suit against Fox News, and Paramount settling with President Trump over quote-mangling on 60 Minutes. CNN's Brian Stelter summarized: "CBS News did nothing wrong. But its parent company still paid the price." Nick Fondacaro has a new column up on the defamation-suit battles. Enjoy the podcast below, or wherever you listen to podcasts. 

Daily Mail: Boulder Terror Suspect's Wife Struggles With Modesty In ICE Detention

Etsy Threatened With Boycott for Alligator Alcatraz Merchandise; Woman Threatens Assault

Teetering Tater: Brian Stelter Melts Down Over Paramount/CBS News Paying Out Millions to Trump

Jamie Raskin Is Going to Have a Tough Time Getting Off the Mat After This Trump Roundhouse

A Hispanic nonprofit civil rights organization plans to file a $1 million lawsuit on behalf of a U.S. citizen who it asserts was assaulted and detained as part of a recent Immigration and Customs Enforcement raid in Los Angeles.

A class-action lawsuit has been filed against a Tennessee law signed by Republican Gov. Bill Lee in May that criminalizes providing shelter to illegal immigrants.