NEW Family Bible Study

5 Powerful Prayers for Breast Cancer

The committee refused to give the Peace Prize to President Donald Trump. This is despite him acting as intermediary to end several wars. He is bringing peace most notably to Israel and Gaza. The Norwegian Nobel committee gave the Peace Prize to Barack Obama at the very beginning of his administration. He did nothing to […] The post Nobel Peace Prize Goes to a Woman Who Has Not Achieved Peace appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

Earlier this month, President Donald Trump and Energy Secretary Chris Wright’s Climate Working Group completed its work, and quietly achieved something few expected: they reset the national conversation on climate policy. For years, Washington’s climate agenda has been dominated by alarmism, junk science, and a revolving cast of “experts” whose warnings are backed not by empirical evidence but the billions of dollars flowing from dark money climate advocacy groups and left-wing billionaires more focused on concentrating power than global temperatures. The federal government has relied heavily on so-called “climate attribution” studies, which claim to link every hurricane, wildfire, and heatwave to carbon emissions. These studies are widely criticized, even within the scientific community, for flawed methodology and confirmation bias. Yet policymakers have treated them as gospel, driving expensive and economically damaging regulations. Craven politicians have used them to attempt to condition the American people to believe every storm is the result of energy producers, and the only answer is multi-trillion-dollar energy transitions. The Climate Working Group ripped that narrative apart. Its report exposed the flimsy assumptions, the overreliance on discredited models, and the tendency to inflate worst-case scenarios while ignoring economic realities. The group didn’t simply question climate orthodoxy; it demanded that science, logic, and reality guide policy — rather than ideology and grant-driven research agendas. Get 40% off new DailyWire+ annual memberships with code FALL40 at checkout! Predictably, the backlash was immediate and loud. Dark-money-funded climate groups with questionable credibility, like the Union of Concerned Scientists and the Environmental Defense Fund, and self-styled “scientists” who have been discredited within peer-reviewed circles, launched predictable attacks, dismissing the report as reckless or even dangerous. They sued to prevent the report from even seeing the light of day. The rapid, even frantic mobilization to shut this report down told us everything we need to know. Because this report poked holes and raised questions about the “climate consensus,” it served as an existential threat to an entire constellation of dark money interests, NGO’s, political candidates and groups, and non-profits that rely on Americans believing that every raindrop and gust of wind they experience is actually the fault of the oil and gas companies. The truth is simple: the group accomplished exactly what it was supposed to do. It recentered the debate on facts, not fear, and reminded policymakers that exaggerated claims of catastrophe do not replace rigorous analysis. And that those with genuine scientific curiosity should not kowtow to a politically driven “consensus” that shuts down questions and intellectual challenge. Events at Climate Week in New York highlighted just how important this shift has been. Secretary Wright joined David Gelles of The New York Times for a discussion on Energy in the Trump administration. Gelles asked questions using the Left’s normal framing about extreme weather and climate change, and Secretary Wright pushed back forcefully, saying, “These crazy convoluted links … making weather more extreme, more hurricanes, more intense hurricanes. That’s not what’s in the IPCC reports, it’s not what’s in the data. It’s what the media says, it’s what activists say, it’s what politicians say. It’s not in the data.” Gelles pushed back: “There’s a ton of attribution science, though. Are you saying that the studies that are showing attribution science that do the actual scientific work to link global temperature rise to specific weather events are not to be trusted?” “Attribution science is not science,” Wright responded. “You can’t draw a long-term slow trend to a weather event, tornadoes, hurricanes, extremely complicated phenomena. Attribution science is someone reaching for something.” Thanks to the Climate Working Group, discussions about climate policy can no longer ignore economic costs, energy realities, or the limits of current science. For the first time in years, the debate has been pulled back from ideological extremes and into the light of scrutiny. Mission accomplished. And if the critics are howling, that’s just proof the Working Group hit the mark. The Honorable Jason Isaac is the Founder and CEO of the American Energy Institute, a trade organization that unapologetically champions free markets and American energy. Previously, he served four terms in the Texas House of Representatives. The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

America is grappling with the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s assassination—not just from the violence itself, but from the painful moral crossroads faced by the suspect’s own parents, who chose justice over blood ties and helped bring their son to account. The Tragic Loss of a Conservative Leader On a Wednesday that will not be forgotten, Charlie Kirk—a prominent conservative activist and co-founder of Turning Point USA—was shot and killed during a public event at Utah Valley University. Kirk’s influence extended far beyond campus, making him a frequent target of political hostility. The attack’s public nature and Kirk’s stature amplified its impact, leaving conservatives across the nation mourning and inflaming concerns about escalating violence against those defending constitutional and traditional values. Investigators quickly released images of the suspected shooter, later identified as 22-year-old Tyler Robinson. What set this case apart was not only the shocking act itself but the critical role played by the suspect’s parents, Matt and Amber Robinson. Recognizing their son in the released images, and guided by Matt’s background as a retired law enforcement officer, the Robinsons faced an agonizing choice between family allegiance and civic duty. In the end, they acted decisively, convincing Tyler to surrender and providing key evidence to authorities—actions that prevented a potentially deadly standoff and ensured the rule of law was upheld. Parental Courage and Moral Dilemma The Robinsons’ decision did not come easily. According to reports, Tyler’s mother had previously noticed troubling signs of political radicalization in her son, which she shared with investigators. When the moment of truth arrived, the family, with the help of a retired investigator friend, prioritized justice and public safety over personal pain. Their cooperation not only led to Tyler’s swift arrest near the family’s home in Washington County, Utah, just 33 hours after the shooting, but it also set a powerful example of integrity under the harshest circumstances. Law enforcement and public officials, including President Trump, commended the Robinsons for their fortitude and commitment to justice, underscoring that personal responsibility and the rule of law remain cornerstones of a free society. Beyond the immediate family, the Robinsons’ actions shifted the entire trajectory of the investigation. By stepping forward, they prevented further violence and community unrest, demonstrating how individual choices can have profound ripple effects in times of crisis. Their conduct stands in stark contrast to the erosion of accountability and personal responsibility too often seen under leftist policies, which many conservatives blame for growing chaos and social division. Social Media Chaos and Misinformation Threat In the aftermath of the shooting, social media erupted with speculation. Tragically, misidentification of the suspect’s father led to death threats against unrelated individuals, including a Nebraska sheriff who bore no connection to the case. Law enforcement was forced to clarify details and protect innocent people caught in the digital crossfire. This episode lays bare the dangers of online mobs and the need for accuracy and restraint in public discourse—a lesson especially critical as political polarization fuels reckless accusations and undermines civil society. Broader Impact and Lessons for the Future The consequences of this event extend far beyond a single tragedy. The Kirk family, the Turning Point USA community, and conservatives nationwide are left to grieve, but also to reflect on the importance of family, justice, and moral clarity. The Robinsons’ willingness to do the right thing—even at immense personal cost—serves as a rare example of virtue in a culture often hostile to traditional values. Meanwhile, the incident has prompted law enforcement to review campus security protocols and highlighted the potential for family involvement to resolve violent crises peacefully. As debates over crime, political violence, and the defense of core American principles continue, this story stands as a powerful reminder that defending constitutional values sometimes requires difficult choices and unwavering courage. The Parents Of Charlie Kirk’s Assassin Faced Darkness But Chose Justice — What this family confronted deserves to be noticed, praised, and modeled. Our country was given clarity in real time. https://t.co/SfVvYq3zzD — kam (@pjkate) October 9, 2025 Ultimately, the Robinsons’ actions have been publicly recognized as exemplary, even as they endure public scrutiny and personal anguish. Their story is a testament to the enduring strength of conscience, the rule of law, and the conservative belief that justice—no matter how painful—must be served for the greater good of the nation. As America confronts threats to its foundational principles, the resolve shown by one family in Utah offers a glimmer of hope for those who still cherish truth, justice, and the American way. Sources: Tyler Robinson, 22, arrested after Charlie Kirk assassination at Utah Valley University Nebraska sheriff receives death threats after being misidentified as dad of Charlie Kirk’s shooter

Renewable energy sources like solar and wind produced more electricity during the first half of the year than any other energy resource, including coal. To bullet another massive accomplishment in the clean energy transition, of the cumulative demand for new power worldwide, renewables met 100% of it. Coal has been the world’s most-consumed energy resource […] The post Renewables Overtake Coal as World’s Biggest Source of Electricity appeared first on Good News Network.

Happy October Listeners! We’re hitting #SpookySZN off hitting you all in the feels, as we venture back in time and reminisce about 10 forgotten and discontinued snacks of yesteryear! It’s an episode that’ll leave you CONTINUE READING... The post The Retro Resurgence Podcast – Episode 26 | The Retro Snacks We Miss appeared first on The Retro Network.