FIRST ON THE DAILY SIGNAL—Republicans could net approximately $1.4 billion in savings through cutting Medicaid coverage for child gender transitions, a senior legislative aide familiar with the unofficial figure told The Daily Signal. The House Energy and Commerce Committee’s markup Tuesday of budget reconciliation includes a provision from Rep. Dan Crenshaw, R-Texas, that would block federal dollars from funding child sex-change procedures, such as hormone-replacement regimens and irreversible transition surgeries. The provision produces around $1.4 billion in savings over 10 years, according to the unofficial Congressional Budget Office score shared with The Daily Signal by a senior legislative aide. President Donald Trump celebrates the Republican victory. “President Trump campaigned on restoring the Gold Standard of Science in American health care. He followed through on that pledge by ordering HHS to conduct a comprehensive, evidence-based review of gender transition procedures for children that revealed serious risks from these interventions,” WH Spokesman Kush Desai. “That science is now driving commonsense policymaking in The One, Big, Beautiful Bill. Promises made, promises kept.” Last month’s budget resolution tasked the Energy and Commerce Committee with slashing $880 billion in spending. If this version of the budget bill is passed by the House and Senate, Medicaid, Affordable Care Act, and Children’s Health Insurance Program funding wouldn’t be allowed to cover child gender transitions. While the markup doesn’t touch Medicaid funding for adult gender-transition procedures, conservatives see the provision as a springboard for future legislation, a senior legislative aide said. Republicans plan to build on the victory of cutting taxpayer funding for child gender transitions. Critics of the Energy and Commerce provision of the markup worry that young 18-, 19-, and 20-year-olds will still be able to obtain taxpayer-funded transitions. Gender clinics might advise young people on Medicaid to just wait until their 18th birthday to begin hormones so that they can receive them on the taxpayers’ dime, critics say. The total cost of transgender interventions can cost upward of $75,000, according to the Human Rights Campaign, one of the largest proponents of the radical gender ideology. Cutting public funding for all transgender medical interventions is widely popular with Americans. The American Principles Project found that 66% of Americans oppose taxpayer funding for all gender-transition procedures, and even The Associated Press recently found that 53% of Americans opposed taxpayer funding for “gender-affirming care,” including puberty blockers and hormone therapy. Crenshaw said on X that his provision, the Do No Harm in Medicaid Act, is something he will be proud of for the rest of his life. He noted that no Democrats tried to strip it out. “Optimistically, maybe the Left finally came around to common sense,” Crenshaw said. “More realistically? They were too afraid to touch it—realizing they’d gone too far. Whatever the reason, we’re putting kids first again—and returning to a basic medical principle: do no harm.” There’s one part of this bill I’ll be proud of for the rest of my life: my provision ending taxpayer-funded irreversible “gender transitions” on kids. No more Medicaid, CHIP, or ACA funding for these barbaric and abusive rituals.No one even tried to strip it out. Not one… pic.twitter.com/jLlESxGsJd— Dan Crenshaw (@DanCrenshawTX) May 14, 2025 Crenshaw is confident his provision will pass the House and Senate. “I think it will pass the House. I think it will pass the Senate. I think President Trump will sign it into law. Keep in mind, President Trump has already done an executive action on this, but it needs to be codified for it to really take effect. This is a huge win,” he said in a video on X. “You got to protect these kids, the science is clear at this point.” The Congressional Budget Office did not immediately respond to The Daily Signal’s request for comment. The post Republicans Could Secure About $1.4 Billion in Savings by Defunding Child Transitions appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Editor’s note: This is a lightly edited transcript of today’s video from Daily Signal Senior Contributor Victor Davis Hanson. Subscribe to our YouTube channel to see more of his videos. Hello, this is Victor Davis Hanson for The Daily Signal. President Donald Trump this week had a historic tour of the Gulf monarchies in the Middle East, in general. He went to Saudi Arabia and he met Mohammed bin Salman, the de facto leader of Saudi Arabia. And he cut a huge deal, which promised $600 million of Saudi investment in the United States and well over $130 or $140 million in Saudi purchase of American arms. And he sort of reset the relationship that had been tenuous during the Biden administration. Then he went to Qatar—which is a rival of Saudi Arabia—and he met the emir. And he kind of topped the Saudi investment because they agreed to buy well over 200 Boeing 777 passengers and 787. That purchase alone could be $200 billion, with maybe a trillion dollars of investment. At the same time, he met the de facto leader who’s emerging out of the disruption and disintegration of Syria, Ahmed al-Sharaa, who’s had, unfortunately, he’s had a history of terrorist activity. And he’d been associated with al-Qaeda, ISIS. Kind of a nebulous past. And the subtext of all of these meetings were: We’re going to replace strife with money. We’re all gonna be profitable. And we have to bring the cause of all of this trouble, Iran, into the fold of the Middle East and drop the hostility to Israel. Notice, of course, that he didn’t go to Israel, although he was trying to elicit support for the continuation of the Abraham Accords with Saudi Arabia and Qatar. This is very ambitious but it’s also very dangerous. Donald Trump thinks he can cut a deal with Iran so that they would do essentially three things: They would give up their nuclear program; they would stop the subsidies to the terrorist surrogates of the Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis; and they would liberalize their society and reenter the family of nations. I don’t think that Shia theocracy feels that is their agenda. I think what they’re probably doing, given their prior history, they’re negotiating, drawing out, and hoping they can outlast the Trump administration while they get closer and closer to 90% enrichment. And they don’t think that Donald Trump, given the MAGA agenda that frowns on unilateral or optional military engagements, especially in the Middle East, will be willing to sacrifice or endanger what has been a spectacular first 100 days, at least in economic terms. And so, they feel that they’re going to, I think, string Donald Trump along and wait him out and then, maybe, with a Democratic administration, announce that they’ve reached 90% enrichment and have a few bombs. So, what am I getting at? There’s a couple of fundamental issues here. One is that the MAGA agenda is kind of a neo-isolationist, that we don’t get involved. But Donald Trump himself—as we saw the first administration and as we saw with the Houthis when he bombed them—has a Jacksonian deterrent and foreign policy. And they’re coming into conflict. MAGA people do not want him to unilaterally stop the nuclear threat in Iran. They would prefer negotiations. But negotiations depend on that threat. By the same token, he’s going to try to get the Saudis and the Middle East sheikhdoms to pump more oil. Pump more oil to not only bring down the price of oil worldwide but really, to be frank, to hurt Russian President Vladimir Putin’s only source of income. And he feels that these two conflicts may be connected. If he can peel away the Middle East from China and Russia and bring down the price of oil, then Putin, who, rumors have it, increasingly is short men, manpower, and equipment, and wants to make a deal with Ukraine but doesn’t know how he’s going to explain to the Russian people how he lost over a million dead, wounded, and missing Russians—for what? Very little in return. Can he make that argument to the Russian people? In conclusion, Donald Trump is facing dichotomies with the MAGA agenda and his Jacksonian foreign policy. He’s trying to get the Arab world to drop their hostility to Israel. At the same time, he’s trying to reason—if that’s the right word—with an unreasonable Iranian regime. And he wants oil to go down. I’m not sure that’s gonna help him in the United States. A lot of the frackers and horizontal drillers are—as the oil has dropped—they’re not at a very big profit margin. And yet, Trump wants them to spend more money and pump more and buy more rigs, etc. So, there’s a lot of things going on. But one thing that’s not going on is we’re not being estranged from the Arab world. We’re not being estranged from Israel. This is not former President Joe Biden mouthing off about the Saudis or the Israelis. It’s a new type of approach that if everybody will just calm down, there’s a great opportunity to make money and be profitable. And that would include the disarmament, nuclearly, of Iran and the inclusion of Israel in the body politic. Very ambitious. Let’s see how it works in the ensuing months. We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal. The post Trump’s Ambitious Middle East Vision, Explained appeared first on The Daily Signal.

The New York Times, which long ago gave up any pretense of objectivity, has once again reminded us what truly keeps the Left up at night: beautiful, confident, conservative women. In a recent style column that reads more like an entry from The Babylon Bee, a writer wrings her hands over a horrifying cultural crisis—no, not the invasion of our southern border or the collapse of American family formation, but the possibility that wearing a sheath dress might make her look like a Trump supporter. Yes, according to the Times, wearing a flattering dress, brushing your hair, and maybe putting on some mascara now constitutes a “MAGA aesthetic.” Heaven forbid a woman look—brace yourself—feminine. The article helpfully outlines how to avoid such tragic associations. Lose the heels. Ditch the makeup. Go “messy.” Wear black to signal you’re “intellectual” or a “rebel.” In short: make yourself intentionally unattractive so as not to be confused with one of those dreaded Trump women—Melania, Ivanka, Kristi Noem, Karoline Leavitt, Alina Habba—all of whom are evidently guilty of the high crime of being beautiful and conservative. The Times calls this look “cartoonish femininity.” But what it really despises is unashamed femininity, especially when paired with traditional values. The modern Left claims to celebrate women’s empowerment—unless, of course, that woman votes Republican, loves her country, and owns lipstick. This isn’t a style critique. It’s ideological policing. The Left understands that culture shapes politics. And they know that feminine, confident, happy conservative women are kryptonite to the feminist narrative that tells young girls their only path to fulfillment is a cubicle, a protest sign, and a therapist on speed dial. The real “Mar-a-Lago face” they fear isn’t lip gloss and lashes—it’s the smile of a woman who knows exactly who she is, what she believes, and isn’t afraid to live it out loud. So here’s a style tip for my liberal friends: if you’re terrified of looking like a conservative woman, maybe you should ask yourself why she looks so put together—and you look like you got dressed in the dark at a gender studies seminar. Because it’s not the dress that’s doing the heavy lifting. It’s the woman wearing it. The post The Left Can’t Tell If They Hate Femininity or Just Conservative Women appeared first on The Daily Signal.

A woman took a shelter cat into her care to give him a soft landing, but the cat decided he wasn't going anywhere. Snuffleupagus (now Tybalt)One Tail at a TimeEarlier this year, a scrawny cat found himself at Chicago Animal Care and Control, needing help. Underneath his rough exterior was a heart of gold waiting to be discovered.He had stopped eating due to a severe upper respiratory infection, but his spirit and love for affection never wavered. When One Tail at a Time (an animal rescue) heard about his urgent need, they sprang into action."We asked our fosters (volunteers) if anyone would be able to take him, and thankfully, a loving foster said yes," Alli Rooney of One Tail At a Time shared with Love Meow. One Tail at a TimeThe cat, named Snuffleupagus, was swiftly taken to the rescue's vet clinic to receive the care and treatment he needed. "Shortly after being rescued, he was so sweet and loving and was so happy to be out of the shelter."He approached everyone who tended to him with snuggles and purrs as if to thank them for helping him. One Tail at a TimeStefanie, who had been with the rescue for a year, came across a request to foster Snuffleupagus and immediately offered her help.She welcomed him into her home, creating a cozy space where he could heal and regain strength. Having cared for numerous foster cats, Stefanie planned to look after him until he found his forever home. But something about this cat felt different. One Tail at a Time"It felt like we could just understand each other, and he trusted me immediately to take care of him," Stefanie told Love Meow.Snuffleupagus quickly made himself at home, shadowing Stefanie everywhere like her most loyal companion. "He's so easygoing and is a friend to everyone—humans, other cats, and dogs. He's nearly unflappable, not scared of vacuums or storms." One Tail at a TimeBrimming with confidence, Snuffleupagus embraced his new indoor life, soaking up every bit of love that came his way. "He loves socializing with people, watching birds either out the window or on TV, playing with toys, and taking naps with mom.""He is the best cat on the planet." One Tail at a TimeSnuffleupagus' sweet and loving nature reminded his foster mom of her late cat, quickly tugging at her heartstrings."I had lost my soul kitty and thought I would never find another cat like him that I had a close bond with. I had been fostering for a year and loved all my kitties but hadn't felt connected to them the way I felt with [Snuffleupagus]." One Tail at a TimeNow fully recovered, Snuffleupagus had turned into a full-time cuddle bug, a dedicated office assistant, and the most adorable supervisor around the house. When it came time to find him a forever home, Stefanie knew in her heart he had already found it."I knew he was for sure mine when he was about to be cleared for adoption, and I found out another volunteer was interested in him—I had a gut feeling that I just couldn't let him go." One Tail at a TimeNow named Tybalt, the once scraggly cat has filled out and blossomed into the fluffy, majestic king he was always meant to be. Whenever he wants attention, he simply gazes at his mom with his striking emerald eyes—and it works like a charm every time.He inspected his mom's bag by flopping right on top of it, giving his feline seal of approval before she could use it. One Tail at a TimeStefanie opened her home and her heart to Tybalt, giving him a second chance at life. Now, he rules the house like a boss, greeting visitors with purrs and snuggles and being his mom's sweetest companion. One Tail at a TimeShare this story with your friends. More cats like Tybalt at One Tail at a Time on Instagram@onlycats_otat and @onetailatatime and Facebook.Related story: Two Kittens Seek Help Together, One of Them Appears Blind but Days Later They Discover He Can See

NJ Transit & Engineers Union Still Talking - Strike Deadline Is MIdnight Tonight

CNN has a weird obsession with making itself look completely stupid by trying to stoke bad vibes whenever it has to report on any good news that can somehow benefit President Donald Trump.  Instead of just reporting the straight news on price pressure relief for American consumers, CNN reporter Matt Egan instead chose May 14 to run one of the dumbest Tasmanian Devil spin headlines yet, “Good news! Prices are falling. But it might be for bad reasons.” Uh, what! The Labor Department’s recently released inflation report showed a welcome unexpected slowdown in the increase of consumer prices against economists’ expectations. This was bolstered by the biggest monthly decline in grocery prices since September 2020 largely attributable to a whopping 12.4 percent decline in the retail price of eggs. Yet, Egan, who is notorious for being a hapless Bidenomics simp, began his piece by noting that “The lowest inflation rate in four-years was made possible by a trend that will surely bring smiles to the faces of Americans: Falling prices.” Then came his absurd spin: “But not all price drops are created equal. Some of the good inflation news might be happening for a bad reason: a weakening economy.” This is like saying, “You shouldn’t really be happy you’re paying less because of an arbitrary doomism theory we have about why your grocery bill just got smaller.” But what more should we expect from Egan? This was the same schlub who in 2024 was waving around leftist economists to cry “that the Trump agenda could actually make inflation worse.” Well, the recent report showed the opposite even with some of Trump’s tariffs already being in place, so Egan predictably had to flip the script and make it look like softening inflation was just as bad as worsening inflation just to ding Trump’s policies: “[M]any economists worry the subdued inflation readings won’t last because of the trade war,” Egan belched. One of the sub-points he zeroed in on from economist Marco Casiraghi was that the recent numbers simply reflected the so-called “‘calm before the storm.”’ Newsflash Egan: This is scareporn propaganda, not news.  Watch CNN Reporter Matt Egan declare Trump’s agenda would worsen inflation in 2024, while Bidenomics was still running amok (June 26, 2024). It didn’t help Egan’s narrative any that the Labor Department would release its report on producer prices a day after his story went live showing a massive 0.5 percent drop against economists’ expectations of a 0.3 percent increase. The Daily Wire noted that the producer price drop “marks the first time the Producer Price Index declined since October 2023.” No worries, Egan will probably find a way to spin that news too. This is just the latest example of CNN not being willing to give Trump an inch even at the cost of looking imbecilic. CNN Business Executive Editor David Goldman also reported on the good consumer price news, but injected a hefty amount of oxymoronic reasoning just to maintain the notion that Trump was still somehow lying about tumbling egg prices even though his argument eventually turned out to be true. His ridiculous headline spoke for itself: “Trump’s egg price fiction has suddenly become reality.” CNN just makes our jobs at NewsBusters way too easy.

The Oversight Project is an initiative by the Heritage Foundation aimed at investigating and exposing abuses of power, corruption, and inefficiencies within the federal government. Back in March, the Oversight Project broke the Biden autopen scandal, alleging that most signed presidential documents during the Biden regime bore an identical signature, with the exception of his announcement of his withdrawal from the 2024 presidential race. The story raised questions about who was really signing documents and running the country. Was Biden authorizing these signatures? If so, was he even aware of what he was signing? Or was someone else acting in his stead? Yet the real bombshell looms: Are the autopen signatures pardoning Hunter Biden, Anthony Fauci, Mark Milley, Liz Cheney, Adam Kinzinger, and Biden family members legitimate? President Trump has made it abundantly clear that he believes they are void. But thus far, no formal court case has been filed by the Department of Justice, despite calls for one. However, the tides may be turning. On May 13, the newly appointed U.S. pardon attorney, Ed Martin, announced that the DOJ is scrutinizing these pardons, particularly those issued immediately prior to Donald Trump’s inauguration. He claimed they were "unprecedented" and very well could wind up in court. To get the scoop on what’s next, “Blaze News: The Mandate” host Jill Savage invited Oversight Project President Mike Howell on the show to shed light on how the Trump DOJ could overturn Biden’s autopen pardons. Howell says the DOJ “[throwing] its weight” behind Martin is “exactly where this always needed to go.” What’s more, Martin has also “expanded the scope” of his investigation into these pardons. “It's not just that they were signed by the autopen mechanism and perhaps without Joe Biden's one, awareness, or two, his capacity to even give his consent”; it’s not just a question of “if it is even legal to use an autopen device,” says Howell. Martin is also asking “whether there was a corrupt intent or a conspiracy in the awarding of the pardons” and “whether it exceeds the scope of the pardon power, which is plenary itself.” “In other words, are these not pardons at all? Were they corruptly designed? And then were they also fraudulent in the implementation via the autopen? There's a lot wrong with these pardons, and I'm glad the DOJ is on it,” says Howell. Blaze News editor in chief Matthew Peterson says this is exactly the kind of thing the MAGA base has been begging for. Since Trump’s inauguration, people have not stopped asking, “When is anyone going to face the consequences of their crimes?” “What are the next steps?” he asks Howell. The only way to test the legitimacy of these pardons, Howell says, is to “charge one of these people,” which shouldn’t be that difficult given that “a lot of evidence that relates to their crimes is already out there, [so] there's not much that is needed in terms of an investigation.” “In the course of that prosecution, of course, these defendants will come up and say, ‘No, I have a perfectly good pardon,’ and that is the means by which the pardons will be tested, and in doing so, we might finally understand who was actually running the White House.” To hear more of the conversation, watch the episode above. Want more from 'Blaze News Tonight'?To enjoy more provocative opinions, expert analysis, and breaking stories you won’t see anywhere else, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

A prosecutor's office is facing outrage after agreeing to a plea deal with only probation and community service for an unlicensed teenage illegal alien who killed a woman in a car accident. The 15-year-old was driving a car with other underage people in it when he barreled into a vehicle being driven by 24-year-old Kaitlyn Weaver in Aurora in July, according to Colorado police. The teenager was driving about 90 miles per hour when he hit Weaver, who was taken off of life support two day later. 'Immigration and the criminal justice system and all these things landed together one day in Aurora, and now I sit here today without a daughter.' John Weaver, the victim's father, said the Arapahoe District Attorney's Office initially told him they would seek the maximum sentence for the underage suspect. "The DA's office said this would be a 'no plea deal' case, so they were not going to offer anything, any concession," he said. Unfortunately, the district attorney's office has changed hands since that time, and the new regime accepted a plea deal with just two years of probation instead. "Why the change? If he had taken a firearm and recklessly just shot it and killed someone, this would be a different case. They would be pushing it completely differently," Weaver said. "There's no deterrence."He is also angered that there is no financial restitution because his daughter's medical bills added up to about $1 million. Weaver says the Jeep the teenager drove was uninsured, and the teen's mother said he took it without permission, so she's off the hook as well. RELATED: Illegal immigrant woman convicted of running over two girls will not be deported nojustice/Getty Images"She didn't even see him coming," he said of the car crash. "That's how fast he was going. She was effectively killed instantly."Weaver said the teenager is applying for asylum, after his mother decided against sending him back to Colombia. The teen is also bound by the deal to go to school and not break any more laws. Arapahoe County Assistant District Attorney Ryan Brackley said that the new administration was not directly involved in the plea deal and that the judge upheld the deal after hearing from the family. He explained that "the impact on the victims and the community" is considered in every plea deal, as well as the "goals of sentencing, including deterrence, rehabilitating the offender, treating similarly situated offenders equitably, and holding each offender accountable."Weaver said the system is broken. "Immigration and the criminal justice system and all these things landed together one day in Aurora, and now I sit here today without a daughter," he added.Scenes from the crime can be viewed on the news video from KCNC-TV on YouTube. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Harvard employees jumped at the chance to offer free legal advice to a comedian who claimed he was going to be deported and even sent him away with tips on how to avoid U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.Education Dept. Secretary Linda McMahon had recently said Harvard has "made a mockery" of the higher education system and has "invited foreign students" to engage in violent behavior.'The second they thought a Palestinian was being deported, all their critical thinking went out of the window.'Much of this contempt on campus has been between supporters of Israel and Palestine, with the school allegedly allowing rampant pro-Palestine protests to take place. When stand-up comedians Danny Mullen and Leo Dottavio visited Harvard's campus, they exposed what appeared to be obvious bias in plain sight.RELATED: House Republicans to hike up Harvard endowment tax in reconciliation Austin Hall, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Photo by: Spencer Grant/GHI/UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty ImagesDottavio allegedly called Harvard's legal offices to ask for help because he was "going to get deported."After simply providing a name and claiming he worked as a cook at Harvard, the men were invited to a nearby building. Blaze News has identified the location as the Office of Clinical and Pro Bono Programs at Harvard Law's Wasserstein Hall.Once inside, Dottavio told staff members he was "living off the grid" and had no documentation or identification on him. As Dottavio was alone with apparent staff members having a discussion, Mullen confirmed that his cohort had been asked to provide documents like an Alien Registration Number, identification from Harvard, and more, which he did not have.Still, at least three people, who appeared to all be Harvard employees, seemingly assisted Dottavio with legal advice based only on his loose assertions. At one point, as Mullen interrupted the meeting with a camera, Dottavio was shown sitting in front of a laptop with a document displayed. Dottavio said the alleged Harvard employees were "showing me the warrant so that I know if ICE shows up, they have to show that warrant."RELATED: Anti-Elon Musk protester starts fight; jiujitsu-trained YouTuber finishes it An immigration poster seen inside a Harvard Law building at Harvard University. Image via Danny Mullen/YouTube (screenshot)Mullen told Blaze News that he was shocked that the staff he interacted with believed Dottavio even though he "had no documents to produce."Mullen added, "The second they thought a Palestinian was being deported, all their critical thinking went out of the window. It took over their minds."The comedian was also surprised to see how much liberal artwork was on the walls of the Harvard facility. This included, per the video, artwork showing a black power fist and a poster showing the text "Keep our families together!" with an image of a baby wrapped in a gay Pride flag."It's crazy that they have a department at a university that isn't even trying to hide its ideology," Mullen remarked.Mullen pointed out that before they left the building, he and Dottavio were handed a "know your rights" card written in Spanish.According to a Google translation, the card read as follows:You have constitutional rights:DO NOT OPEN THE DOOR if an immigration agent is knocking.DO NOT ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS from an immigration agent if he or she tries to speak to you. You have the right to remain silent.DO NOT SIGN ANYTHING without first speaking to a lawyer. You have the right to speak to a lawyer. If you are outside your home, ask the agent if you are free to leave, and if he or she says yes, leave quietly. GIVE THIS CARD TO THE AGENT. If you are inside your home, show the card out the window or slide it under the door.RELATED: Border Patrol agent allegedly exposes genitals to YouTubers, brags about penis size before kissing adult film star - Harvard did not respond to a request for comment from Blaze News.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Pre-orders have just gone live for the long-awaited Stellar Blade PC port, which brings Eve (and her ever-growing wardrobe) to Steam and the Epic Games Store more than a year after its debut on PS5. However, players in some countries are finding themselves unable to lock in their pre-order, with Stellar Blade blocked in dozens of countries, seemingly due to the same issue that caused mass review bombing for Helldivers 2 last year - the requirement for a Playstation Network account. The really wild part is that the game’s developer appears to have been blindsided by this and is surprised to see the game being region-locked. Continue reading Stellar Blade PC port blocked on Steam in over 100 countries, surprising its dev MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Stellar Blade PC, Best soulslike games, Best RPG games