Not all customers are going to be happy with the upcoming update to Starbucks' Rewards program. Continue reading…

Imagine a home that feels like you're on vacation, with a water park and spa sprawling across 60 acres. This place is something else. Continue reading…

The Supreme Court just ruled to put judges on notice! The tendency of activist judges to crush infrastructure and energy projects over extreme environmental concerns just got called out in a SHOCKING 8-0 vote. I can hear the astonished response now: “Even the LIBERAL JUDGES voted for that!?” YES! — but for a different reason than the others.  (We’ll get to that in a moment, because I don’t trust them on this.) What this means is that the usual nightmare of red-tape facing every critical project of national or regional importance is going to be harder for activist judges to use for blocking those projects than in recent decades. If you count the judges in this photo, you’ll see the usual 9: BREAKING: In a MAJOR WIN for the Trump Administration, the U.S. Supreme Court has UNANIMOUSLY limited activist judges’ authority to block infrastructure projects over alleged environmental concerns. pic.twitter.com/KKZ1bLqEX6 — Proud Elephant (@ProudElephantUS) May 29, 2025   But one of those judges didn’t vote, and actually recused himself from the case. He didn’t explain why, but rumor has it Gorsuch’s connections to a certain Utah-based billionaire with a stake in this case was the reason he opted out. (We’ll get to that, too.) This ruling “slightly curbs” the overreach of the courts in cases revolving around the environmental impact of big projects like drilling for oil, putting in rail lines, or constructing pipelines. The ruling came down this morning, with Kavanaugh authoring the UNANIMOUS opinion according to a Fox News report: The Supreme Court on Thursday limited the authority of judges to block infrastructure projects due to environmental concerns. The justices handed down the lone decision Thursday morning, slightly curbing judicial authority at a time when President Donald Trump’s administration is loudly complaining about alleged judicial overreach. “NEPA does not allow courts, ‘under the guise of judicial review’ of agency compliance with NEPA, to delay or block agency projects based on the environmental effects of other projects separate from the project at hand,” Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote in the opinion of the court. “Courts should afford substantial deference and should not micromanage those agency choices so long as they fall within a broad zone of reasonableness,” the opinion continued. Thursday’s decision was an 8-0 ruling, with Justice Neil Gorsuch taking no part in the consideration of the case. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Amy Coney Barrett joined with Kavanaugh’s opinion. That wording is hard to misinterpret, even for us folks who never opted for a law degree. “…does not allow courts…” “…under the guise of judicial review…” “…should afford substantial deference…” “…should not micromanage…” Those phrases are music to Conservative ears when you apply them to OUT OF CONTROL judges! One person whose ability to do his job will be impacted immediately by this ruling is President Trump’s FCC Chairman, Brendan Carr. Drilling, transporting, and refining oil isn’t the only thing impacted with this ruling. (Though they certainly are impacted!) Advancements in technologies related to communications like internet and satellite-fed television transmissions generally require ground-based projects to support those advancements in remote wilderness areas often considered off-limits by the environmental extremist crowd. Those technologies, and the infrastructure that supports them, is the FCC’s area of regulation — but allowing a certain degree of DEREGULATION to occur in order to remove roadblocks to those technological advancements requires cutting the red tape. And that’s EXACTLY what this ruling will do, among other things. FCC Chairman Carr took to social media to express his excitement over today’s decision: For too long, America’s infrastructure builds have been held back by reams of red tape. But today, the Supreme Court helps to correct course—eliminating needless environmental hoops. As the FCC works to unleash more infrastructure builds, permitting reforms like this are key. pic.twitter.com/wNAWl7ec05 — Brendan Carr (@BrendanCarrFCC) May 29, 2025 Here’s the full text of his excited post: This is welcome news for Utah and America’s energy future. The Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling poses a firm and a clear message: NEPA is a “procedural cross-check, not a substantive roadblock.” For too long, litigious groups have weaponized environmental reviews to stall critical projects—oil, gas, wind, solar, nuclear, and more. I’ll keep pushing for real permitting reform to unlock our full potential to provide affordable, reliable, and clean energy. If we’re serious about unleashing American energy, we need to give the sector what it needs most: predictable rules and freedom from arbitrary delays. But one key energy-related infrastructure project was even more immediately impacted by today’s ruling. At the heart of this case was a railway the federal government wanted to install in Utah to increase the ability to transport oil. That project was held up by judges on the basis of potential impact on theoretical “future project”, as Kavanaugh went on to address in his opinion, as reported by The Hill: NEPA requires the government to consider the impacts of proposed infrastructure projects, ranging from highways to pipelines. At issue in the case was a federal government’s assessment of a proposed railway line to ship oil in Utah. A lower court ruled the government’s review was inadequate because it did not fully consider the impacts of increased oil production and refining that could occur as a result of the railway project. The majority opinion, written by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, disagreed. “When the effects of an agency action arise from a separate project—for example, a possible future project or one that is geographically distinct from the project at hand—NEPA does not require the agency to evaluate the effects of that separate project,” he wrote. The opinion also reins in the power of federal courts to block projects along similar grounds. Kavanaugh’s opinion literally called out the judicial activists who argued that there might be MORE OIL PRODUCTION as a result of this rail project, and the ability to move more oil… and that was somehow a bad thing. Thankfully, Kavanaugh (and 7 other Justices!) called BS. One US Senator from Utah (a Republican) took to social media and emphasized the impact this would have on President Trump’s plan to make America ENERGY DOMINANT again. Just like he did during his first term, in case anyone forgot! Here’s his post celebrating now that the ‘litigious groups’ that kept America from becoming energy dependent have now had their knees swept out from under them, which will now allow the railway project in his state to go forward: This is welcome news for Utah and America’s energy future. The Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling poses a firm and a clear message: NEPA is a “procedural cross-check, not a substantive roadblock.” For too long, litigious groups have weaponized environmental reviews to stall… pic.twitter.com/oqHeyX1jvm — Senator John Curtis (@SenJohnCurtis) May 29, 2025 Here’s a more detailed report on that rail project in Utah, and the implications for oil deliveries to the rest of the nation, from the local Fox News affiliate: 20250529 U.S. SUPREME COURT GIVES THE GREEN LIGHT ON THE UINTA BASIN RAILWAY scotus pic.twitter.com/Eprhr5aToE — Robert Waloven (@comlabman) May 29, 2025 As I stated earlier, even the three Justices known for being the liberals on the high court voted in favor of limiting judge’s ability to throw the brakes on these types of projects. I can promise you — it isn’t because they suddenly became conservative-minded Trump-supporting members of the MAGA movement. In fact, I wonder if they didn’t have an ulterior motive for siding with the rest of the Justices, knowing that the ruling was going to pass anyway. Here’s the ‘official’ reason they gave for voting against judicial overreach in this circumstance, as explained in this article from CNN: The National Environmental Policy Act, signed by President Richard Nixon, is considered one of the foundational environmental laws formed at the beginning of the modern environmental movement. Kavanaugh wrote that the environmental question at issue in the case – an 88-mile railway that would carry waxy crude oil from the Uinta Basin in Utah to existing rail networks – was “not close.” “Simply stated, NEPA is a procedural cross-check, not a substantive roadblock,” he later added. “The goal of the law is to inform agency decisionmaking, not to paralyze it.” The court’s three liberals – Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson – agreed with the outcome of the case but had different reasoning. Writing for the three, Sotomayor said that such environmental reviews conducted by federal agencies should be limited to their own expertise. The Surface Transportation Board, which conducted the review in this case, is primarily focused on transportation projects, not oil refining. (Emphasis added.) Did you catch that? I suspect Sotomayor let the cat out of the bag on her reasoning. I’ll contend that she and the other two liberal Justices didn’t care one bit about “judicial overreach”. After all, those three are some of the judges consistently engaging in that same “overreach”! Their reasoning was more in line with a top-down view of governance; you know — centralized planning and “experts” put in charge of all the rest of us in a utopian system of PRAGMATIC governance. I’m remembering the calls to “trust the science” during Biden’s Covid era, which wasn’t about “science” at all.  What they REALLY meant was trust the SCIENTISTS. In other words… trust the people that WE deem are experts — and let them rule you, for your own good. (Screw that.) She wasn’t worried whether the judges had the authority to stop those projects, only that the specific agency that tried to stop this project wasn’t the right “expert” that should have been handling this case. Those three would have been perfectly fine with this overreach, if only the RIGHT EXPERT would have done the overreaching! Her separate opinion representing the specific reasoning of those three liberal Justices was their way of saying “we don’t agree with the limited government folks”. And yet, since they voted to restrict those judges (which was going to happen with or without their support) their vote allowed them a chance to create more illusion of AGREEMENT that this was more about WHO was allowed to impose judicial control, as opposed to whether that control is allowable at all. Maybe I’m missing something, but that’s my take.  Sneaky! For the time being, it won’t matter. Critical projects necessary for the national development President Trump wants to put on the front burner during this term in office can now go forward with far less obstacles. Eventually, those liberal Justices will try to bring their skewed version of today’s ruling back in to play, when some other litigation pops up. But for now, it’s “Build, Baby, Build”… an “DRILL, BABY, DRILL”! Tally that up for a HUGE WIN for the Trump Administration, and the nation! What do you think?

This is pretty incredible…. President Trump is hosting a press conference with Elon Musk on his last official day as a special advisor and he suddenly stops the press conference and has a laptop brought in and he forces the entire press pool to watch CNBC praising his administration for off the charts good numbers. I love his face in this clip, it really says it all! Enjoy: Only President Trump would make the Fake News watch their own Fake News networks admit Trump is a economic genius Look at that smile… https://t.co/TNtwcYx2o6 pic.twitter.com/xKgnHRq1rO — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) May 30, 2025 You can watch the entire press conference here if you like:

Here’s what we previously reported right here on WLT Report: Ok, now let’s go deep…. Here’s a full summary of everything we know so far: U.S. Army 250th Anniversary Parade – June 14, 2025 Event Overview: Date & Time:Saturday, June 14, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. EDT Location & Route: Start: Pentagon’s north parking lot, Arlington, VA Crosses: Arlington Memorial Bridge Proceeds: Constitution Avenue Ends: 15th Street near the National Mall Estimated Duration: 90 minutes Participants: Troops: 6,600 total soldiers 6,300 marching Soldiers from 11 Army corps and divisions Vehicles: 150 military vehicles Up to 25 M1 Abrams tanks Stryker vehicles, Bradley fighting vehicles Paladin artillery, Howitzers Aircraft: 50 aircraft Includes CH-47 Chinooks, UH-60 Black Hawks B-25 bombers, P-51 Mustangs Bands: Seven Army bands Civilians: Up to 2,000 Historical reenactors, veterans’ groups Military college students Operators of historical vehicles and aircraft Historical Representation: 60 troops per major conflict: Revolutionary War Civil War World Wars I & II Korea Vietnam Gulf War Global War on Terror All in period uniforms Followed by 400 modern-uniformed soldiers from corresponding units Key Events: Golden Knights parachute team lands on the Ellipse Presents folded American flag to President Donald Trump Enlistment Ceremony: Trump will administer the oath to 250 recruits and soldiers Aircraft Flyovers: Featuring both modern and historical planes Presidential Involvement: Review stand and bleachers at the Ellipse President Trump expected to deliver remarks The event coincides with Trump’s 79th birthday National Mall Festival (11:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m.): Military equipment displays (Humvees, helicopters, armored vehicles) Fitness competition for soldiers Family-friendly activities: NFL-sponsored Kids Zone with Commanders coach Dan Quinn Camouflage face painting Recruiting booths Expected Attendance: ~200,000 Evening Events: Concert on the Ellipse – 8:00 p.m.: 5 to 7 musical acts Likely performers: Noah Hicks, Scotty Hasting, DJ Nyla Fireworks Display – 9:45 p.m. Logistics & Costs: Estimated Cost: $25–$45 million Covers troop transport, housing, meals, and equipment Soldiers to sleep in USDA and GSA buildings Meals: MREs for breakfast and lunch, hot dinners Tanks: Transported by train from Fort Cavazos, Texas Roads protected with metal plates and rubber track pads Security: Not included in estimate Event designated as a National Special Security Event Public Access: Free Tickets: Available via America250’s registration portal Deadline: June 10, 2025, at noon EDT Controversy: Criticism from Lawmakers: Senator Chris Murphy and Representative Steve Cohen allege political motives linked to Trump Concerns from D.C. Officials: Mayor Muriel Bowser warns of potential road damage from heavy military vehicles Protests Planned: Groups opposing the event’s scale and political undertones Context: This parade is an early celebration of the U.S. Army’s 250th anniversary Broader America250 events are scheduled for 2026 Follows Trump’s longstanding interest in military parades A similar parade was proposed in 2018 but canceled due to a $92 million cost estimate Military.com reports that the soldiers will stay in federal bulidings: Thousands of soldiers coming to Washington, D.C., next month will be housed in government buildings in the city as part of an unusual military parade, an idea originally floated by President Donald Trump during his first term in office. The June 14 military parade, which coincides with Trump’s 79th birthday, will include about 6,600 soldiers as well as tanks, armored personnel carriers and aircraft on top of other festivities throughout the week in celebration of the Army’s 250th birthday, according to the service. Roughly 150 vehicles, including Strykers, M1 Abrams tanks and Humvees, along with 50 aircraft, will take part. The soldiers will come from all 10 of the Army’s active-duty divisions located across the country, and most will be housed in the General Services Administration and Agriculture Department buildings in the city, The Washington Post reported. All told, the festivities could cost between $25 million and $45 million, Army spokesperson Lt. Col. Ruth Castro said. Celebratory events will start at the beginning of the week and will conclude with the parade, fireworks and a fitness competition, Castro said.

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott signed legislation requiring Apple and Google to verify the ages of all app store users. The bill, called the App Store Accountability Act, aims to prevent minors from downloading apps or making in-app purchases without verified parental concerns. This week, Governor @GregAbbott_TX signed the App Store Accountability Act into law. Texas protects children and empowers parents with the tools to keep them safe. https://t.co/oKBYWgSQO0 — Governor Abbott Press Office (@GovAbbottPress) May 29, 2025 Texas became the second state to pass an age-verification law. Per NewsNation: The law follows similar legislation passed earlier this year in Utah and reflects growing concern over children’s access to digital platforms. Meta, the parent company of Instagram and Facebook, along with Snap and X, praised the bill’s passage. “Parents want a one-stop shop to verify their child’s age and grant permission for them to download apps in a privacy-preserving way. The app store is the best place for it, and more than one-third of US states have introduced bills recognizing the central role app stores play,” the companies said, according to Reuters. However, Apple and Google opposed the law, arguing that it requires them to share age data with all apps, even those that pose no risk. “If enacted, app marketplaces will be required to collect and keep sensitive personal identifying information for every Texan who wants to download an app, even if it’s an app that simply provides weather updates or sports scores,” Apple said in a statement. Critics said the bill essentially mandates digital ID to access apps. “In Texas, Apple and Google will now be the bouncers at the front door of the internet, checking IDs for every app download,” Reclaim The Net wrote. In Texas, Apple and Google will now be the bouncers at the front door of the internet, checking IDs for every app download.https://t.co/81ONgZUwxX — Reclaim The Net (@ReclaimTheNetHQ) May 29, 2025 Opponents of the bill also cited the attack on privacy and online anonymity by requiring verification of an individual’s identity with their digital presence. CNN reports: App store operators Google and Apple argue that the age verification bills will undermine individual privacy. That’s because every user, not just children, will have to provide sensitive data — likely an ID or a scan of their face — to confirm their age, even if they only want to download something like a weather app, where age is irrelevant. And the custody rule will require parents to turn over even more personal documentation. Legal experts have also raised concerns that such laws could run afoul of the First Amendment by forcing adults to choose between handing over personal information or accessing “legally protected online speech.” Likewise, minors would be forced to get parental consent before accessing protected online speech. Apple and Google have suggested alternative proposals that would involve a shared responsibility for age verification between app stores and app developers, and sharing age data only with the platforms that need it. Apple says it is set to release an “age assurance” feature that lets parents share their child’s age range with app developers. “Importantly, this solution does not require app marketplaces to collect and keep sensitive data—such as passports or driver’s licenses—from all users to verify age,” a company spokesperson said in a statement last week. Google did not immediately respond to a request for comment after Abbott signed the Texas law.

Elon Musk is officially stepping down today as special advisor to DOGE but only because the law mandated he do so. In parting remarks, he says DOGE will continue and only grow stronger.  It’s in the beginning of it’s efforts and is becoming a way of life.  It’s not going anywhere. And neither is he, in many regards. He says he will continue to be an advisor to the President and continue to be involved as needed. President Trump also gifted him with a very special honorary key. Watch here: Elon Musk is presented with a giant KEY as a “Parting Gift” and Elon gives a brief speech Elon thanks President Trump and says this is just the beginning, but takes a moment to appreciate the GOLD through the Oval Office. Feel like a messages was just sent. Anyone else?… https://t.co/qw49iHnlJS pic.twitter.com/Mr7fbZeDD0 — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) May 30, 2025 From the same event, we also got this gem: EPIC: President Trump Forces The Fake News To Watch The Media Praising His Administration! This is pretty incredible…. President Trump is hosting a press conference with Elon Musk on his last official day as a special advisor and he suddenly stops the press conference and has a laptop brought in and he forces the entire press pool to watch CNBC praising his administration for off the charts good numbers. I love his face in this clip, it really says it all! Enjoy: Only President Trump would make the Fake News watch their own Fake News networks admit Trump is a economic genius Look at that smile… https://t.co/TNtwcYx2o6 pic.twitter.com/xKgnHRq1rO — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) May 30, 2025 You can watch the entire press conference here if you like:

It seems as though Elon Musk was not in the mood to suffer fools kindly today. Nor should he be. And he seems to also have taken a page out of President Trump’s playbook and ran that play to perfection! When asked about the New York Times, Elon cut off Peter Doocy and absolutely destroyed the New Your Times….while the New York Times was in the room! Watch here: JUST IN: Elon Musk Absolutely Destroys The New York Times Right To Their Face pic.twitter.com/PiYgC4ALJT — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) May 30, 2025 While I loved the response, I do have to say I think it was a bit unfair to Doocy. I think Doocy was trying to lob him a softball right over home plate and Elon torched it before ever getting to really swing at it. But that’s ok, the New York Times doesn’t even deserve to get mentioned in a question. Well played Elon!

To quote Sigmund Freud, “Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar”. The point being that while Freud was famous in his career for finding hidden meanings in dreams, sometimes there is no hidden message to be found. Sometimes, if a cigar appears in your dream it doesn’t necessarily represent a giant penis.  Sometimes it just represents a cigar. The same I suppose is true in the world of politics and news. While we’ve been called “conspiracy theorists” more times than I can remember, and while most of those “conspiracies” have actually been proven to be true over time, sometimes…..a black eye is just a black eye. At least, I hope so. Because the major topic today is not the budget, or tariffs, or deportations….no, the major topic is why Elon Musk suddenly has a big old black eye. You know, like these guys: At the Doge press conference Elon appears to have a blackeye. Is he part of the club? pic.twitter.com/js4oM6phrz — Tracie Wiest (@TracieWiest) May 30, 2025 I’ve covered this so many times before, probably because it just keeps happening. We just keep adding new people into the club. And let’s just say it’s a club full of very unsavory characters. But the big question now is, did Elon Musk just join it?  And was it an initiation or is a black eye sometimes just a black eye? Credit to my friend MJTruth for being one of the first to notice it and call it out: What’s up with Elon’s eye? https://t.co/j7YvI3vMTw pic.twitter.com/r4VPWR70x7 — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) May 30, 2025 Another angle here, all from Elon’s Oval Office press conference with President Trump: Why is Elon Musk’s right eye, black and blue?????? pic.twitter.com/pq3RkEfNl4 — CM MAGA (@Kelseynicki) May 30, 2025 A couple more here: Does Elon have a black eye? pic.twitter.com/RPt4aY0W4j — FloridaGirl (@EyesOnThePlan) May 30, 2025 Side view: What’s wrong with Elon’s right eye? pic.twitter.com/zMaNrJial9 — Brian with an i (@br_anlee) May 30, 2025 Ok, so those are all not the best quality, and I was wondering if perhaps there were just some weird shadows going on with his hat, but sadly I don’t think that’s the case. This clear, zoomed-in photo makes it quite clear: Elon has a black eye. Getty / Kevin Dietsch pic.twitter.com/tuobW7jBsx — Blue Georgia (@BlueATLGeorgia) May 30, 2025 Backup here: Elon Musk has a black eye. Who punch him? Getty / Kevin Dietsch pic.twitter.com/NE7YQySxA7 — Lucas Sanders (@LucasSa56947288) May 30, 2025 And this one shows a close up of Elon from his big SpaceX presentation last night: Zoom in on @elonmusk. Am I the only one who seen the bruised eye. I hope he’s ok! pic.twitter.com/8UY1h36HEH — Austin (@SimObjReality) May 30, 2025 So the black eye is clearly there. The only question now is…why? What happened? For the record, I asked Grok and it says there is no public record (yet) of Elon addressing the black eye. So…did he join the Black Eye Club? I will point out one positive note on the club, most of the initiates have the black eye on their LEFT eye: Elon’s black eye is on his right eye. So that is different than 90% of the members of the club. Here was the last new initiate we had: Famous Pop Singer Joins The “Black Eye Club” Famous Pop Singer Joins The "Black Eye Club" I just recently ran an article about the "Black Eye Club". In case you missed it, I'll put the link right here: EXPOSED: The Satanic “Black Eye Club” And we suddenly have a new member. NOTE: I am not claiming this person is Satanic.  And we don't even know how or why she has a black eye (more on that in a moment).  But we do know that she suddenly has a black eye and is being very cryptic about it. She posted these two photos without much context: ??DEVELOPING: Multi Grammy award winning singer Lorde has fans concerned after she shared these photos of her with a bruised eye. pic.twitter.com/n8rlfQ8J03 — Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives (@dom_lucre) October 1, 2024 US Magazine reports that not only did Lorde post the cryptic photos, but she also deleted all other posts from her Instagram: Lorde is raising eyebrows due to her recent social media behavior. On Monday, September 30, the Grammy winner wiped everything from her Instagram profile except for a cryptic new post. “DYHTS? © ?ĿŁု⑷♶⚤ ,” she wrote via Instagram, sharing several selfies showcasing what appeared to be a black eye. In the carousel of photos, Lorde, 27, is seen driving around Los Angeles with a visible bruise below her right eye. She also shared a picture of a disc from ProHealth Advanced Imaging, which may provide answers to her apparent injury. While the bruises may appear troubling to some, some fans didn’t appear to be too concerned about the “Royals” singer. In the comments section, a few followers reacted to the post with references to her music. “Someone said she got punched for the love club,” one fan wrote in an ode to her 2013 album. Another user seemingly recalled her 2017 single “Green Light” when they added, “Did you forget to wait for that green light…?” Others simply believe this might be a way for Lorde to tease her upcoming album. In her latest post, the artist shared a photo of a hat that stated, “Do you have the stones?” The initials for Lorde’s caption are also DYHTS. “She’s hinting that she has a ‘hit’ coming,” one fan speculated in the comments section. Another user added, “Excellent way to re-enter social media. Lead with the black eye and the enigmatic baseball cap. I like it, Lorde. I like it. Keep these people on their toes.” Over the summer, Lorde seemingly teased her long-awaited fourth album by sharing a brief clip via Instagram of herself nodding along to a catchy techno beat with the caption, “Will be back in touch.” Here's more from the NY Post: New Zealand singer Lorde has worried her fans after wiping her Instagram feed before sharing several photos of herself sporting a black eye. The cryptic post, shared to her social media account on Tuesday, featured a handful of selfies of the 27-year-old sitting in a car with a bruise under her eye. Another photo, shared to the same post, showed Lorde sitting at a restaurant, where her black eye was also visible. The caption read, “DYHTS?”. The acronym was followed by several symbols, in which the letters ‘L4’ were among them, which some have deemed as a hint Lorde is preparing to release her much-anticipated fourth album. In one of the pictures, the New Zealand singer was seen sitting in a car with the bruise under her eye. Instagram / @lorde Others, however, expressed confusion and fears for the Grammy winner, with her post racking up thousands of concerned comments. “GIRL THIS IS SO CONFUSING,” one fan wrote. “So concerning,” another wrote. “Posting this with no context is crazy. It’s probably all for aesthetic, but hope you’re okay girl,” a third added. “WHAT DOES IT MEAN,” another begged. Lorde’s latest Instagram post has her fans worried after she posted several selfies spotting a black eye. Instagram / @lorde “Help what happened?” a fifth wrote. Lorde, real name Ella Yelich-O’Connor, shot to fame as a teenager in 2012 with the release of her hit single Royals. Fans of the singer have been eagerly awaiting an announcement on new music, with Lorde teasing her upcoming fourth album several times over the past year. She released her third studio album, Solar Power, to much fanfare in 2021, with the album marking her first drop in four years following 2017’s Melodrama. We've covered the "Black Eye Club" many times before here at WLTReport and it's so strange that we keep adding new members! But seemingly only famous people. Have you ever known someone in real life (friend or family member) who got a black eye? I can't think of one! But all these big celebrities and politicians keep getting them like clockwork: Adrenachrome "Black Eye Club" Finally Exposed In Detail... I've written about the Black Eye Club several times before. Most recently, when John Roberts was inducted. First a little background if you're not familiar, and then scroll down for the most recent video I found giving more information than I have ever seen. What is it they say.... Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is......? And how about a dozen or two dozen? No, I'm not talking about the Clinton Kill List. I'm talking about the "Black Eye Club". Many of you have probably heard of this, but in case you haven't get ready for your mind to be blown. How many adults have you known in your life that have ever suffered a black eye? A really bad one....a huge black and blue shiner? Me? None, personally. I have never rolled into work and saw Hank in the office next door suddenly have a huge black eye on Wednesday morning. But for powerful political people and celebrities? It happens all the time! Strange, don't you think? Just take a quick look, and I think you'll be shocked: The Black Eye club. I have NEVER had a Black eye. and TBH I actually dont know anyone personally who has.Yet... pic.twitter.com/qS5BSRXc0p — Deke Savage (@big_simp) April 24, 2019 https://twitter.com/ihatematt/status/1121941782940606465?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1121941782940606465%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fdeplorablefeed.com%2Fwhy-do-so-many-politicians-and-celebrities-have-black-eyes%2F What's up with the "Black Eye Club?" pic.twitter.com/etBJGnMUua — YasharAl (@YasharAl2) April 27, 2019 4)There are numerous politicians and celebrities who have had a (left) black eye. Remember, this is about Royal Authority. #Qanon pic.twitter.com/pg92vmQ1l4 — Jess Telling Truth (@fixurheart2016) December 23, 2017 The “Black Eye” ClubAlthough not officially an organization at all, the “#BlackEye” club refers 2 a growing number of #politicians, #celebrities, business elites, & heads of State who have suddenly & mysteriously wound up with black eyes.#TheBlackEyeClubhttps://t.co/U5GzS9DEH1 — ֆǟʍǟɛʟ (@FragmentedSoul5) October 20, 2018 Riiiight. Sounds like the good ol “I fell down the stairs and got this black eye” excuse. Hillary trying to teach ol’ Bern a lesson ? Sen. Bernie Sanders expected to continue on the campaign trail after shower door injury https://t.co/IGVy7w2hhu — Trent Lanie (@TrentLanie) March 15, 2019 Just hours after suffering injuries from a fall in his home, the oldest living former US president traveled to Nashville, where he and his wife, Rosalynn Carter, have been working on building new porches for 21 homes with Habitat for Humanity https://t.co/cnmgYLWogz — CNN (@CNN) October 12, 2019 Why is it always the LEFT eye? And the same exact spot? Black Eye Club. pic.twitter.com/IA8nv532A3 — DailyTruthReport (@DailyTruthRpt) November 24, 2020 https://twitter.com/MunkeyPilot/status/1306978567159508992 https://twitter.com/soldav4/status/1326060059814752256 Last year, I brought you the newest inductee.... U.S. Supreme Court CHIEF Justice, John Roberts. Just a HUGE coincidence, I'm sure: https://twitter.com/Starsns44130411/status/1282055873901322246 https://twitter.com/17SpaceForce17/status/1324474530170052608 https://twitter.com/AJ_Patriot4Life/status/1280688306012000259 https://twitter.com/RussellPost/status/1291166767025455111 https://twitter.com/Kojak1776/status/1280829305006800898 Judge Roberts - Compromised, Hunter Biden, Rush Limbaugh, Trump News https://t.co/nWKvUPI9gu via @YouTube JOHN ROBERTS APPARENTLY IS IN THE BLACK EYE CLUB. — molly98 (@hoffman47) October 25, 2020 https://twitter.com/RussellPost/status/1290499649082494979 Watch out for the black eye... Chief Justice John Roberts hospitalized last month after fall near Maryland home, Supreme Court confirmshttps://t.co/3oaxFDxbXO — Efficiency Advocate Lord Rupert Everton (@smarkster) July 8, 2020 And today? In March of 2021? I bring you the newest member.....none other than Mittens Romney! The Hell you say! Take a look: https://twitter.com/WayneDupreeShow/status/1366546040233558020 https://twitter.com/NetworksManager/status/1366613249454669827 Mitt Romney has now joined the black eye club. pic.twitter.com/bXG6mKXwR8 — Ben Owen (@hrkbenowen) March 2, 2021 Are Harry Reid and Mitt Romney part of some type of Mormon Fight Club I am unaware of? https://t.co/6HF8t7Wj3l — Steven Jackson (@stevenpjackson) March 1, 2021 https://t.co/9oD0uWXbs7 "Soul Scalping" - Is Facial Bruise Mark of the Beast?https://t.co/IzIaHenbMk — Henry Makow (@HenryMakow) March 2, 2021 Mitt Romney joins the Black Eye Club pic.twitter.com/GO2gjR2DvF — Ben Owen (@hrkbenowen) March 2, 2021 Let's not forget Justice John Roberts testifying under oath with a black eye couple yrs ago He said he fell by his home as well. More than 3 & it starts to look not so coincidental. It's not just Reid, Romney & Roberts, there r more officials that have rocked black eyes as well pic.twitter.com/6unr2IBUCy — Just For Fun (@resistance_ms) March 2, 2021 Are these people just the most clumsy, uncoordinated people in the whole world? Or something more going on? From the NY Post, here is the "official" story: Sen. Mitt Romney was knocked unconscious when he fell in Boston over the weekend, leaving him with “a lot of stitches” and a black eye. “I took a fall. Knocked me unconscious. But I’m doing better,” Romney told reporters on Capitol Hill Monday night. The Utah Republican said he was visiting his grandchildren when he got injured. With noticeable bruising under his right eye, Romney infused some humor into the situation. “I went to CPAC, that was a problem,” the Republican lawmaker joked, referring to the Conservative Political Action Conference that ended Sunday. Romney was not invited to the marquee event after receiving backlash over his vote to impeach ex-President Donald Trump. Asked how many stitches he received, Romney claimed he was not sure. “A lot of stitches. I don’t know how many. I asked the doctor how many stitches and she said, ‘I don’t know,’ but it’s all through my eyebrow and my lip.” Now I told you I wasn't going to draw any conclusions...and I'm not. I don't know what is going on, I really don't. But I DO know when something is not right, and I will say that....this is not right. And this is not a coincidence. Even The Sun has even noticed the trend and had this to say (sure, it's all just "NUTTY"): NUTTY conspiracy theorists have claimed celebrities with black left eyes are marking themselves out as members of the ILLUMINATI. Actors, musicians, politicians, and even the Pope have all been snapped with shiners recently – sparking claims they are members of a secret society. Conspiracy theorists claim Illuminati recruits are forced to ‘eat pain’ during high-level initiation rituals. They claim bruised left eyes – known as ‘Illuminati shiners’ are marks given to those who have scaled their way to the top of the sinister organisation. Radio host Sherry Shriner – who wrote ‘Interview With The Devil’ – said: “You cannot be on TV now, without signing on the dotted line. “The bizarre recurrence of facial bruises on Illuminati politicians and entertainers has resulted in speculation that their souls have been replaced in a satanic ritual called ‘soul scalping'”. Shriner, who died last year, claimed all of the world’s leaders have been soul-scalped. She also claimed to have been able to speak to the devil. Among the celebs to have sported black eyes over the years are Adam Sandler, Prince Philip, George W Bush, and Liz Hurley. Prince Andrew showed off one in 2017, while Prince Phillip reportedly “woke up” with one one morning in 2013. Gossip columnist Perez Hilton claimed a black eye was given to him by Polo Molina – the manager of the Black-Eyed Peas. Pope Francis had a bad eye cut last year, which he attributed to an accident in the ‘Pope-mobile’. And George W Bush claimed he had been hit in the face by a microphone stand during a speech. And I have to end with this. Because this is the perfect ending.... https://twitter.com/MstrDebator/status/1288487213534261249 Yup. Bingo. And THAT is why they hate him. He's not in their "club". They don't control him. Period. Now, here's the latest! I just found this video and it does the best job I've seen from any source of showing exactly how many "famous" people are in the club. It will shock you. And horrify you. It's not in English, but that doesn't matter, just watch the names and faces: Watch safely here on Rumble: And one more. How the Illuminati Black Eye Club, the abduction of Children for sacrificial uses and the use of Adrenochrome for nefarious purposes by the rich elite/Illuminati Satanic Order. Watch here on Rumble:

New York City mayoral candidate Andrew Cuomo received a $675,000 fine from the New York City Campaign Finance Board for improperly coordinating with a Super PAC. The former New York governor is widely considered the frontrunner of the race. Andrew Cuomo fined $675,000 by New York City Campaign Finance Board over super PAC commercial https://t.co/EDai0JrAuE — John Solomon (@jsolomonReports) May 30, 2025 Per Just the News: The former New York Democrat governor was fined $622,056 two weeks ago over an ad that the PAC, Fix the City, aired in support of Cuomo, which the city’s campaign finance board suspected was improperly coordinated with the campaign, Politico reported. Board member Richard Davis noted that Fix the City spent another $675,000 to continue airing the ad after the first fine. Consequently, the board withheld that same amount in public funds from Cuomo’s campaign and counted it against his spending cap. “The board will continue to investigate the issue,” Davis said. The total amount of campaign finance fines against Cuomo’s campaign is around $1.3 million. WATCH: .@andrewcuomo is docked another $675k in matching funds for alleged coordination with a Super PAC, @FixTheCityNYC. It’s also going to apply to his spending cap – so he won’t be able to spend as much as other candidates in the race pic.twitter.com/g57niw2IfG — Courtney Gross (@courtneycgross) May 30, 2025 Cuomo also faces a Justice Department probe related to his congressional testimony last year. He faces accusations from congressional Republicans for allegedly lying about nursing home deaths in New York during COVID-19. Justice Department Launches Probe Into Andrew Cuomo According to PIX11, new polling indicates a tightening race for New York City mayor. An internal poll from Zohran Mamdani’s campaign shows he is gaining on former Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the race for mayor. https://t.co/IvKUyObbIm — PIX11 News (@PIX11News) May 27, 2025 PIX11 reports: Former Gov. Andrew Cuomo may no longer be running away with the Democratic Primary. This poll conducted from May 23 to May 26, shows him with a 12-point lead over Queens Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani, a lead that shrinks to 8% with ranked-choice voting. Cuomo is getting 35% of first-choice votes in the first round of Emerson’s ranked-choice voting simulation, which excluded approximately 4% of voters who said they were undecided. Mamdani is at 23% in round one, and Comptroller Brad Lander rounds out the top three getting 11%. Cuomo’s lead further narrows as lower candidates are eliminated and their votes flow to others under NYC’s ranked-choice system. He beats Mamdani in the final round of ranked-choice voting by 54% to 46%. In response to the poll, Cuomo Campaign spokesman Rich Azzopardi wrote: “This poll of registered voters appears to be an outlier, but the facts across the board remain the same — Andrew Cuomo is the consistent and overwhelming frontrunner in this race. That’s because New Yorkers know he is the only candidate in this race with the executive experience and the proven record of results to fix what’s broken and put this city back on the right track after 12 years of failed leadership.”