YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #virginia #astronomy #police #humor #nightsky #moon #crime #treason #animalbiology #supermoon #perigee #commies #zenith #loonyleft #lawenforcement
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

One America News Network Feed
One America News Network Feed
6 w

Speaker Johnson reveals GOP is working on new healthcare plan amid shutdown
Favicon 
www.oann.com

Speaker Johnson reveals GOP is working on new healthcare plan amid shutdown

GOP Speaker of the House Mike Johnson revealed that Republican leaders are developing a new healthcare plan amid the government shutdown, while Democrats continue pushing the Trump administration to permanently extend Obamacare subsidies.
Like
Comment
Share
NEWSMAX Feed
NEWSMAX Feed
6 w ·Youtube News & Oppinion

YouTube
‘I’m Rudy Giuliani 2.0’: Curtis Sliwa
Like
Comment
Share
NEWSMAX Feed
NEWSMAX Feed
6 w ·Youtube News & Oppinion

YouTube
Kamala Harris would not be serious in 2028: Mark Meadows | The Record with Greta Van Susteren
Like
Comment
Share
Independent Sentinel News Feed
Independent Sentinel News Feed
6 w

Expose in Jonathan Karl’s Book: Trump Called Pence a “Wimp”
Favicon 
www.independentsentinel.com

Expose in Jonathan Karl’s Book: Trump Called Pence a “Wimp”

ABC News released some notes and a comment President Trump made to Pence that are in a new book. They are notes Jack Smith planned to use as evidence to prosecute President Trump. The big reveal is that Trump apparently told Pence he would be known as a “wimp.” This was during their final phone […] The post Expose in Jonathan Karl’s Book: Trump Called Pence a “Wimp” appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Wire Feed
Daily Wire Feed
6 w

Poking Holes In California’s Prop 50: See-Through Envelopes And Lack Of Voter Privacy
Favicon 
www.dailywire.com

Poking Holes In California’s Prop 50: See-Through Envelopes And Lack Of Voter Privacy

For years, concerns about the lack of voting integrity in California have simmered beneath the surface — concerns rooted foremost in the absence of a requirement for valid identification at the polls. This has been a central issue for Republicans, who have fought for decades to implement common-sense verification measures, yet repeatedly found their efforts stymied by Democrats resistant to change. Now, with the approach of the November 4 election, these concerns are once again thrust into the spotlight thanks to the controversial California Proposition 50, a ballot measure that stands alone and, many argue, wastes both public time and money. At the heart of this issue is the gerrymandering that has come to define California politics. Despite making up roughly 25% of the state’s registered voters, Republicans account for just 17% of California’s congressional delegation. Democrats, meanwhile, hold an overwhelming 83% of the state’s 52 available House seats. Such disproportions raise pressing questions about the fairness and responsiveness of the democratic process within the state. To better understand the stakes of this upcoming vote, I spoke with Deborah Pauly, an attorney with the Lex Rex Institute in Long Beach — a constitutional advocacy group engaged in public interest litigation to restore electoral integrity. According to Pauly, Proposition 50 is not just a technical adjustment or benign update to election law. She describes it as a retaliatory measure, devised in Sacramento, aimed at achieving mid-decade partisan redistricting that further consolidates Democratic power at the expense of meaningful representation and electoral competitiveness. But as troubling as the redistricting implications may be, Pauly points to an even larger and more urgent issue: the fundamental security, or lack thereof, in California’s voting process, especially with respect to mail-in ballots. She urges all voters to be extremely cautious about using their mail-in ballots to register votes in this election. Why is secure voting so critical? Because the legitimacy and stability of our democratic process depend on it. A core American principle is that every vote must be counted as cast and must remain private and protected. When voters are confident their ballots are secure, the civic fabric holds firm — even amidst the most heated or contentious races. Strip away that confidence, and the door swings open to polarization, conspiracy, and ultimately, the unraveling of public trust in democratic outcomes. Unfortunately, there is mounting evidence that California is failing to uphold this bedrock democratic principle. As revealed by a volunteer working with Patriot Force California, the mail-in ballots for this year’s solitary ballot initiative appear to be neither private nor secure. Pauly thus describes an “incurable flaw” in the design of the mail-in ballot envelope issued in Orange County — a flaw that may very well be echoed in counties across the state. In a recent Lex Rex Institute video, and as seen in the image below, this risk is starkly demonstrated. With just one item on the ballot, folding the ballot in half and placing it in the purportedly “secure” envelope leaves the vote clearly visible if anyone shines a light through it. As someone who has already sent in such a ballot, I can attest to the disturbing accuracy of this claim. Thankfully, the Lex Rex Institute is preparing to file a challenge to the mail-in ballot envelopes in the federal courts in the Central District of California. Source: Author/Lex Rex Institute. Note this is not just an abstract concern: the right to vote in privacy has deep historical roots, going back to 1888. That is why voter privacy is built into the infrastructure of every voting center, with walls and barriers designed to ensure confidentiality. Yet these same standards are being ignored when it comes to absentee and mail-in voting. Even worse, Pauly notes flaws have been discovered in Sacramento — ballots that can be partially viewed due to literal holes in the envelope, putting the privacy of the vote at direct risk. The evidence is clear: compromised privacy in mail-in voting is not unique to Orange County. So what does Proposition 50 represent, if not a dangerous step backward? The flaws and breaches revealed are not mere technical oversights — they are fundamental violations of a citizen’s right to a secret ballot and to confidence in the voting process. Allowing these problems to go unchecked would undermine not only the outcome of this ballot, but the entire system by which we govern ourselves. This is a clarion call for all Californians who value their vote and believe in genuine democracy. If you care about the sanctity of your ballot, do not remain silent. Make your voice heard loudly — not only at the ballot box, but by contacting your Registrar of Voters, your local representatives, and the courts. Demand real security for all ballots, insist on proper ballot design, and require true transparency in our electoral process. Support principled organizations like the Lex Rex Institute and Patriot Force California as they lead the legal challenge to restore election integrity. The right to privacy, and the assurance of a fair, accurate vote, is the foundation of self-government. These are not partisan issues, but essentials of the republic itself. Insist on immediate reforms and lend your voice and energy to the fight to ensure Proposition 50 and future elections live up to the standards America deserves. The integrity of our republic depends on our resolve to defend it. Stand up. Speak out. Demand better — for yourself, and for generations of Californians yet to come. * * * Walter Myers III is a Southern California-based Senior Fellow at Discovery Institute. The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire. Join us now during our exclusive Deal of the Decade. Get everything for $7 a month. Not as fans. As fighters. Go to DailyWire.com/Subscribe to join now.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Wire Feed
Daily Wire Feed
6 w

Dem Loses It When Confronted With His Thoughts On Past Shutdowns: ‘I Don’t Know And I Don’t Care’
Favicon 
www.dailywire.com

Dem Loses It When Confronted With His Thoughts On Past Shutdowns: ‘I Don’t Know And I Don’t Care’

Senator Rubén Gallego (D-AZ) became visibly agitated when CNBC host Joe Kernen confronted him directly on how he’d responded to government shutdowns in the past — particularly when Republicans had been the ones making demands — and Kernen ultimately pulled the plug on the entire interview. “If Republicans shut down the government the next time Democrats are in charge to extract whatever it is that they happen to want —” Kernen began. “Like they did last time?” Gallego interrupted. “Are you saying that’s okay? Are you saying that’s okay if they do that next time?” Kernen asked. “Republicans have done this quite a while, yes,” Gallego claimed. “What did you say about it when they did it?” Kernen asked. “I don’t know and I don’t care,” Gallego shot back. WATCH: “I don’t know and I don’t care,” says petulant baby @RubenGallego when asked about his past shutdown comments. Here’s a reminder — 2013: You can’t “shutdown the government… and still claim to be a Patriot” 2019: “Putting the country in danger” 2023: “Put country before… pic.twitter.com/JbA7aU1M2B — Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) October 27, 2025 The interview did not get less contentious from there. Join us now during our exclusive Deal of the Decade. Get everything for $7 a month. Not as fans. As fighters. Go to DailyWire.com/Subscribe to join now. Kernen and Gallego clashed over Democrats’ demands for reopening the government, in large part because Gallego claimed Democrats were not making any demands and then in the same breath explained what he and other Democrats “want” before they’ll vote to reopen the government. WATCH: Senator Gallego (D-AZ) claims Democrats aren’t “demanding anything” to reopen the government. This is a lie. Democrats have spent the last month demanding a plethora of things, including $1.5T in spending, which could allow illegal aliens to receive taxpayer-funded healthcare. pic.twitter.com/IiZdP4U8Dt — Media Lies (@MediasLies) October 27, 2025 “We’re demanding a very simple thing. … We want to make sure that Americans, 24 million Americans, do not see their insurance premiums doubled,” Gallego said at first. “Well, by not extending [subsidies], it would go up. But what’s the $1.5 trillion, Senator? You could extend those for one year, you could extend the Obamacare subsidies for $40 billion. For 10 years, you can do it for $345 billion. You’re asking for $1.5 trillion.” “I’m sorry, are you an insurance broker?” Gallego objected, and then insisted that the money was all to prevent increases in premiums. “What’s in the $1.5 trillion? You could do it for 10 years, Senator, for $345 billion. What’s the $1.5 trillion that Democrats are demanding to open the government?” Kernen asked again. “We’re not demanding anything. This is just a Republican talking point,” Gallego claimed. “All I want is for the ACA to be extended for Americans, for 24 million people to not get their premiums doubled. In Arizona, we are talking about 500,000 people.”
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Wire Feed
Daily Wire Feed
6 w

Trump’s Third-Term Talk Puts Leftists In A Tizzy Again
Favicon 
www.dailywire.com

Trump’s Third-Term Talk Puts Leftists In A Tizzy Again

President Donald Trump riled up leftists again on Monday when he addressed rumors about a potential run for a third term in 2028. While traveling to Japan on Air Force One, Trump told reporters that he hasn’t “really thought about” running for a third term, but then added, “I would love to do it.” Trump suggested that the GOP didn’t need him to run to win the next presidential election and was complimentary of Republicans under him who could take the mantle. He name-dropped Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, even saying that Rubio and Vance would be “unstoppable” if they joined forces. Trump, however, appeared to leave the door open for another White House run. “I would love to do it. I have the best poll numbers I’ve ever had,” the president added. “I mean, I just solved eight wars, and a ninth is coming. I believe Russia-Ukraine will happen.” Speaking with reporters on board Air Force One en route to Japan on Monday, President Trump again refused to rule out a bid for a third presidential term, despite the 22nd Amendment limiting presidents to being elected twice. Read more: https://t.co/Ya2ePJ8PGo pic.twitter.com/5yReOrVuWg — ABC News (@ABC) October 27, 2025 A potential third term came up when a reporter asked Trump about comments made last week by the president’s former chief strategist, Steve Bannon, who said that Trump would serve a third term in the White House. Bannon, who is not serving in the current administration, said that “there is a plan” to allow Trump to run again. “Trump is going to be president in 2028, and people just ought to get accommodated with that,” Bannon told The Economist, adding, “We need him for at least one more term, and he’ll get that in 2028.” Join us now during our exclusive Deal of the Decade. Get everything for $7 a month. Not as fans. As fighters. Go to DailyWire.com/Subscribe to join now. On Monday, Trump ruled out one theory of how he could obtain a third term, saying that running as Vance’s vice president in 2028 and then having Vance step down would “be allowed,” but added that it would be “too cute.” “I wouldn’t do that. I think it’s too cute. Yeah, I would rule that out,” he said. “I think the people wouldn’t like that. It’s too cute. It wouldn’t be right.” Multiple leftist political commentators and legacy media hosts latched onto Trump’s and Bannon’s remarks, with one commentator even calling them a “threat,” rhetoric similar to what progressives have been using more regularly to describe the Trump administration and Republicans. After Trump’s third-term remarks, CNN host Brianna Keilar interviewed presidential historian and author Alexis Coe, who said that the talk about a third term for Trump “should be viewed as a threat.” Coe also suggested that by the 250th birthday of the United States next summer, it could “no longer” be a constitutional republic. NEW: CNN is very concerned about President Trump’s jokes about running for a third term, says the comments should be seen as a “threat.” This is coming from the same people who had no problem with Kamala Harris being handed the nomination without a single vote. “We should view… pic.twitter.com/bhp9Dezgzi — Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) October 27, 2025 Cenk Uyghur, host of The Young Turks, wrote on X that Trump’s comments on Monday prove the point of “No Kings” protesters who gathered in cities nationwide earlier this month to protest the Trump administration’s actions. “Trump said he hasn’t ruled out a third term. Good news, the constitution already ruled it out for him,” Uyghur said. “And you wonder why people have No Kings protests. Really, it’s hard to figure out?” The hosts of ABC’s “The View” also chimed in, with Sunny Hostin saying, “I have come to the conclusion that he is most definitely going to try to remain in power.” She then brought up Trump’s White House East Wing construction, arguing that the president “is hooking up the White House because he doesn’t plan on leaving it.” “I told you all that years ago,” co-host Whoopi Goldberg said. “That he was not going anywhere. He said it. He said, ‘I want to be president for life.'” ‘The View’ Goes Full-Tilt: Leftist Hosts Spread Conspiracy Theory Trump Wants to Remain in Power The View ladies are back spreading a wild conspiracy theory that Trump wants a THIRD TERM in office… all because he is doing renovations at the White House. No, Seriously. “Did… pic.twitter.com/wTvQ9kJa3s — Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) October 27, 2025 Third-term rumors have been swirling again among many on the Left amid Trump’s East Wing demolition and plans for a White House ballroom. Trump’s critics argue that no president would make such drastic changes to the White House if he planned on leaving it. Whether Trump is trolling leftists who make these arguments with his remarks on a third term remains unclear, but if he is, it’s working. Trump, who would turn 82 before the 2028 presidential election, has brought up serving more than two terms multiple times and has given mixed signals on where he stands on the possibility. The 22nd Amendment of the Constitution states, “No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice.” The 22nd Amendment was ratified in 1951, shortly after President Franklin Delano Roosevelt was elected to four consecutive terms before he died in office in 1945. After saying in April that “there are methods” that would allow him to run again, he told NBC’s Kristen Welker in May, “This is not something I’m looking to do.” “I’m looking to have four great years and turn it over to somebody, ideally a great Republican, a great Republican to carry it forward,” he added.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Wire Feed
Daily Wire Feed
6 w

Muslims Are The Real Victims Of 9/11, According To Zohran Mamdani
Favicon 
www.dailywire.com

Muslims Are The Real Victims Of 9/11, According To Zohran Mamdani

Six days after Islamic terrorists murdered thousands of Americans on September 11, 2001 — as many victims remained unaccounted for, and as rescue workers continued cutting through the rubble — George W. Bush spoke at the Islamic Center of Washington. The president stated that the terrorist attacks, although they were committed by Islamists in the name of Islam, had actually contradicted the fundamental tenets of the faith, because, as he put it, “Islam is peace.” Bush also affirmed that Muslims in the United States “love America just as much as I do.” Ask any historian, and they’ll tell you that Bush’s “Axis of Evil” speech — delivered five months later, at the State of the Union — was the defining neoconservative speech of the era, the one that launched the global war on terrorism and established its objectives. But that’s not true. It’s actually not even close to true. The real goal of the neoconservative movement, from 2001 onward, was spelled out at the Islamic Center of Washington by George W. Bush, as Ground Zero was still smoldering.  That speech made it official: Neoconservatives were not going to defeat anti-American evil abroad. Instead, in response to 9/11, they would accelerate their efforts to import this evil into the United States, on the theory — which they maintained in public, with a straight face — that foreigners from the Middle East were just as American as anyone else. To be clear, Bush did not simply make the claim that al-Qaeda — along with millions of Muslims all over the world — had misunderstood the Quran’s call to murder non-believers. Bush went much, much further than that. He declared that Muslims from foreign countries, most of whom advocate for sharia law, are just as American as you are. What happened next is almost never talked about, although it’s one of the most important — and catastrophic — developments in the history of America. We didn’t pause or end Muslim immigration to the United States. We increased it dramatically. I want you to stop and really pay attention to what I’m about to share. Here it is: Virtually the entire current Muslim population in the United States came here after 9/11. This is a chart from DataHazard: @fentasyl Credit: @fentasyl/X.com/DataHazard In the 1990s, there were between 500,000 and 1 million Muslims in this country. Now there are more than 4.5 million. Put another way, in this country, the Muslim population has more than quadrupled since 9/11. Guess what’s happened to the Christian population in Iraq during that same period — the country we were supposedly liberating? It went from 1.5 million to around 200,000. They were ethnically cleansed. They were terrorized and killed, or forced to leave. Meanwhile, some of our most important cities — the centers of our economy — were flooded with Muslims. We were told to welcome these people and give them refuge from their third-world hellholes because, after all, they’re just as American as we are. So how have things turned out, exactly? Nearly 25 years after 9/11, after several decades of unfettered neoconservatism and liberalism, what does New York City look like today? As of 2024, more than 20% of the voters in New York currently struggle to speak English. That’s not an exaggeration. It’s from a document prepared by the “Office of Immigrant Affairs” in the mayor’s office: “22 percent of New Yorkers … are considered to have Limited Language proficiency.”  Think about that for a second. One in five New Yorkers can’t speak the English language. One in five people in our largest and most important city cannot speak our language. Pick a random person on the street, and there’s a good chance you won’t even be able to have a conversation with them. Nor will you have any shared culture or history whatsoever. You will have nothing in common with this person — this “American.” Overall, 38% of the population of New York wasn’t even born in America. And of course, roughly 35% of these foreigners are unemployed and completely dependent on the government for survival. They are contributing nothing to this country or its economy.  This is a demographic replacement that, under administrations of Bush and Obama, was sold to the American people as a clear positive. After all, who wouldn’t want more hard-working, peace-loving future Americans to move to this country and contribute their talents and work ethic to the advancement of Western civilization? That particular outcome was never going to happen. Instead, we have imported so many foreigners who despise this country and Christianity in general that the next mayor of New York City is almost certainly going to be a Muslim socialist from Uganda who openly mocks the victims of 9/11. To that end, the other day, this Muslim socialist, whose name is Zohran Mamdani, delivered his closing argument in the mayor’s race. Watch: Zohran through tears: “My aunt stopped taking the subway after 9/11 because she did not feel safe in her hijab.” Yes, she was the real victim of 9/11 pic.twitter.com/aILr4JtVvF — Greg Price (@greg_price11) October 24, 2025 Credit: @greg_price11/X.com This is a line that Mamdani has trotted out in other contexts, as well — including a video that his campaign put out, in which he complains that Muslims have been forced “to endure hatred and bigotry in the shadows.” So he really thinks this is a compelling argument. He’s saying it’s horrifying and sad that his aunt’s tummy felt funny when she wore a hijab on the subway, shortly after Islamist terrorists murdered thousands of Americans and destroyed one of the most recognizable landmarks in the entire country. And not only that — he’s blaming us for his aunt’s feelings. He’s not blaming the Muslim terrorists. It’s our fault. Mamdani’s aunt is the real victim here.  This is that Norm Macdonald tweet in real life. Credit: @normmacdonald/X.com The one where he says, “What terrifies me is if ISIS were to detonate a nuclear device and kill 50 million Americans. Imagine the backlash against peaceful Muslims?” This is, essentially, the closing argument of the Mamdani campaign. You can watch Mamdani’s full remarks, and he never really gets around to mourning the thousands of Americans who were slaughtered at the hands of al-Qaeda, or explaining why they died and who killed them. He also never gets around to articulating any actual harm that his aunt supposedly suffered. You’d think, if this were really a bigoted white supremacist hellhole, that someone would’ve actually done something to his aunt. It wouldn’t all be in her head. But that didn’t happen. Nor did it happen to anyone like Mamdani’s aunt. First of all, the story is almost certainly made-up for political reasons. We all know that. It’s completely unverifiable. It makes no sense. Additionally, there are now reports floating around that Mamdani has just one aunt, who lived in Tanzania during 9/11, according to her LinkedIn, and who doesn’t wear a hijab in photographs posted on social media. Credit: @TrinityMustache (Trinity Votes Blue)/X.com. (LinkedIn. Devex.com) Whatever the truth may be, don’t expect The Washington Post or “PolitiFact” to look into this, for obvious reasons. Mamdani is a sociopath. They know it. That’s why they support him in the first place. And to be clear, he’s not just lying about his aunt here. In that campaign video I mentioned earlier, Mamdani tries to claim this is broader than his aunt. He says that Muslims are constantly antagonized in this country. Watch: The dream of every Muslim is simply to be treated the same as any other New Yorker. And yet, for too long, we have been told to ask for less than that, and endure hatred and bigotry in the shadows. No more. pic.twitter.com/B7BWrifQ1f — Zohran Kwame Mamdani (@ZohranKMamdani) October 25, 2025 Credit: @ZohranKMamdani/X.com There’s a lot to go over here. Mamdani constantly runs down this list of grievances that Muslims supposedly have against our country. A country that they have flocked to in record numbers. But the complaint about “random screening” is always the most incredible. In reality, to this day, they make sure to screen elderly white disabled grannies at TSA just as much as they screen military-aged Arab males named Mohammed, even though 0% of the global terror threat comes from the former and 100% comes from the latter. This country has bent over backward for the Zohran Mamdanis of the world. Muslims have been treated far better here and have been far more welcomed than any white American Christian would be in any Muslim country. In fact, Muslims have been treated better in the United States than they’re treated in many Muslim countries. There wasn’t any sort of campaign of persecution and oppression against Muslims after 9/11. In fact, the government went absurdly out of its way to avoid even the impression of such a thing. Our government responded to 9/11 by apologizing to Muslims, and then importing millions of them into our cities, and letting them build their mosques and blast their call to prayer over the loudspeakers at 5:00 in the morning. That’s the kind of “persecution” they’ve endured. The persecution of being welcomed here and given literally everything they want with virtually no pushback whatsoever. And for all that effort, we don’t get even so much as a thank you in return. Instead, they whine and complain and denounce and accuse us. And work every day to subvert our country and destroy everything that made us great. In response, you’ll often hear leftists argue that “hate crimes” against Muslims supposedly went up after 9/11. And they’ll show you this chart of “reported hate crimes.” Credit: @rowanfornow/X.com There are about a thousand different problems with their argument here. First of all, as we’ve discussed many times, “reported hate crimes” are a meaningless category. The idea of a “hate crime” itself is meaningless, but a “reported” hate crime is even more meaningless. A reported hate crime is when someone calls the police and claims someone did something mean to them. It’s not an arrest. It’s not a prosecution. It’s not a conviction. It’s a report. For example, if Mamdani’s aunt called the police and said someone yelled at her for wearing a hijab, that would count, even if it wasn’t true. So by the definition of “hate crime,” roughly 95% of the hate crimes are just flat-out fake. They’re either misinterpreted by the victim, or the victim himself called them in, to get sympathy.  And even given this definition — which is extremely overbroad — there were still fewer than 500 hate crime reports involving Muslim victims, across the entire country, in the aftermath of 9/11. So there was one hate crime report for every five people who burned to death, or jumped out of a burning building, or died in a plane crash on 9/11. And we’re supposed to be horrified by these numbers. Compare those figures to other religious groups, and the narrative falls apart even further. Source: FBI Credit: FBI Uniform Crime Reports Using the FBI’s numbers, from 2001 to 2012, hate crimes against Muslims were reported roughly as often as hate crimes against Christians (including Catholics and Protestants). Jews are at the top of the list. The category of “other religions” and “multiple religions” together reported more hate crimes than Muslims.  If you get back to the hate crime chart, you’ll notice even more issues. It’s pretty clear from the trajectory here that, after the spike in reported “hate crimes” post-9/11, reports of hate crimes against Muslims plummeted, then went flat, for the rest of the decade. And that’s remarkable because, again, the Muslim population exploded during this period. So you’d think that the raw number of hate crimes against Muslims would go up, simply as a matter of statistics. But the number didn’t go up. In fact, it went down. And it stayed down. The point is — no, there was no epidemic of criminal violence against Muslims after 9/11. There was no legitimate reason for anyone to be afraid of wearing a hijab. But even if Muslim women were afraid of wearing a hijab on the subway — that would actually be completely rational. When Islamists commit mass murder in the name of their religion, it’s entirely reasonable to feel uncomfortable if you go out in public, days later, showing off an unmistakable sign of your submission to Islam. It would be weird if we lived in a society where that wasn’t the case. When members of a religion slaughter thousands of us, and then point to supposedly holy texts that explicitly validate their approach, then basic survival instincts dictate that we take a closer look at people who adhere to that particular religion. Meanwhile, if you look at hate crime convictions, instead of reports, you’ll find that, according to the DOJ, there have been around 200 “anti-Muslim hate crime convictions since 9/11.” That’s it. A grand total of 200 convictions, over more than two decades. That includes everything from making threats to vandalism to murders. (And there were just three murders in this category, out of the 200 total “hate crimes.”) Already, you can see how minuscule these numbers are when you consider the fact that we’re a country of 340 million people. But just for fun, let’s put that number in context. By one estimate, in the same time period, since 9/11, there have been at least 160 actual, confirmed Islamic terrorist attacks on the U.S. homeland. Not “reports” of attacks. Actual violent attacks by Islamists in the United States. So if you’re going to try to make the argument that “Islamophobia” is a real thing, then by the exact same token, you need to agree that Islamist ideology is a much, much bigger deal. Of course, the truth is that there was no rash of “Islamophobia” after 9/11 or whatever. Instead, what’s happened is that we’ve imported millions of people who openly despise this country and its forefathers— including Mamdani’s father, who believes that Hitler was inspired by Abe Lincoln. (He also wrote in his book that we should consider suicide bombers as “soldiers”). Watch: Zohran Mamdani’s father was ethnically cleansed by Ugandans in 1972, along with 80k other Indians. The Brits took him in as a refugee. Americans gave him a scholarship and a professorship. And he’ll never forgive us for it. https://t.co/gOcH3vrSWP — Roman Helmet Guy (@romanhelmetguy) October 26, 2025 Credit: @romanhelmetguy/X.com Mamdani’s entire family needs to be denaturalized and deported. That’s what it takes, at this point. This is a guy who was forced, along with his entire family, to leave Uganda by the dictator Idi Amin. He wanted the entire Asian minority gone, and he gave them 90 days to get out of the country. (This is the same dictator, by the way, who uttered the infamous line, “There is freedom of speech, but I cannot guarantee freedom after speech.”). As they forced nearly 100,000 Asians out, Ugandan soldiers robbed, beat, sexually assaulted, and killed many Indians. So this was a very desperate time for people like Mamdani’s father. They would have easily been killed or forced into poverty. But Britain took them in, along with many other refugees. Ultimately, Mamdani’s father was welcomed into America, where he became a well-paid professor at Columbia University, where his wife would become a millionaire director working on Disney movies, and where his son would ultimately become a theater kid writing school essays about “white supremacy.” So, Mamdani and his family and his fellow Muslims have not been persecuted at all in the slightest. They have not faced hate crimes at a rate any higher than any other religion, and in fact have faced them at a lower rate than several other religions. They have been nothing but welcomed, tolerated, and celebrated. One of the very first things the President of the United States did in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, while the rubble was still smoldering, was step on stage and talk about how wonderful Muslims are. And yet, through all of this, across thousands of public speeches and interviews and debates, here are two words we’ve never heard Zohran Mamdani say: “Thank you.” As in, “Thank you, America, for opening your arms to me. Thank you for allowing me to come and reap the benefits of a nation that nobody in my family or my home country or my religion has any hand in building. Thank you for continuing to welcome us even after co-religionists attacked you. Thank you for giving me everything, while I have given you nothing in return. Thank you for taking me in, and taking in my people, and supporting us and feeding us and housing us, and taking food out of your own children’s mouths to put into ours. Thank you.” Zohran Mamdani has never said that, or anything like it. And every year, we welcome millions more foreigners into this country who will never say that, or anything like it. You teach your children to say please and thank you, and yet we import millions who have never said it, and will never say it, and demand more even as they show no gratitude or appreciation for what they’ve already been given. Mamdani is their poster child. He has no spirit of humility or gratitude at all. He takes from us and then scolds us for not allowing him to take more. He sits down at our table uninvited, eats more than anyone else — doesn’t even use a fork — complains that he wasn’t served better food, and never says thank you. Not once. And we, as Americans, are sick of being treated this way. This was always going to be the result of decades of uninterrupted immigration from countries that are fundamentally incompatible with our own, at a cultural and religious level. It was always going to be the outcome of decades of false rhetoric, promising that Islamists are somehow just as “American” as anyone else. This is what “neoconservatism” and “neoliberalism” have in common. Sooner or later, both ideologies — which are supposedly polar opposites — guarantee that anti-American foreigners will start running in our elections. And although they can barely speak English, they will eventually out-vote Americans. And then, without firing a shot, they will conquer the very city they attempted to destroy on 9/11. Barring a miracle — barring a realization that eluded New Yorkers, and most of America’s political leadership, for decades — that’s exactly what’s about to happen.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Wire Feed
Daily Wire Feed
6 w

WATCH: Hochul Says She Thought Socialists Chanting ‘Tax The Rich’ At Her Were Saying ‘Let’s Go Bills’
Favicon 
www.dailywire.com

WATCH: Hochul Says She Thought Socialists Chanting ‘Tax The Rich’ At Her Were Saying ‘Let’s Go Bills’

In a moment ripped straight from the sidelines at Talladega, Governor Kathy Hochul claimed on Monday that when a crowd of New Yorkers began chanting “Tax the rich!” at a rally for mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, all she’d heard was, “Let’s go Bills!” Hochul gave the implausible explanation when she was asked about the chanting and whether she would stand firm on not raising taxes despite Mamdani’s repeated calls for higher taxes on wealthy New Yorkers — and on corporations that do business in the city, whether they are located within the city limits or not. WATCH: Kathy Hochul oddly drags Buffalo Bills into ‘tax the rich’ chant that overwhelmed her appearance at Zohran Mamdani rally https://t.co/tTLLtrO6Nv pic.twitter.com/1vBIiNrzL6 — New York Post (@nypost) October 27, 2025 “Given the reception that you received last night at Zohran’s rally where people were chanting, ‘Tax the rich, Tax the rich,’ are you going to hold the line on raising taxes even if it means losing an endorsement or getting a primary challenge?” the New York Post’s Stephen Vago asked. “I couldn’t hear what they were chanting,” Hochul claimed, before adding, “I thought they were saying, ‘Let’s go [Buffalo] Bills.’ I wasn’t sure. When you’re up there, I heard some noise. I heard a lot of cheers. But later on it became clear to me that there’s a — I know there’s a passion for that.” Join us now during our exclusive Deal of the Decade. Get everything for $7 a month. Not as fans. As fighters. Go to DailyWire.com/Subscribe to join now. Hochul left out the fact that she was in New York City at the time — where they have two NFL teams — and therefore a little over six hours away from Buffalo, New York, by car. She went on to say that she really hoped Democrats could harness the “energy” behind those cheers in order to win back control of the House in the 2026 midterm elections. Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) shot back, “The #BillsMafia won’t forget. What a trainwreck @KathyHochul is every single day.” The #BillsMafia won’t forget What a trainwreck @KathyHochul is every single day. https://t.co/dBgS5giRI2 — Elise Stefanik (@EliseStefanik) October 27, 2025 Others pointed out how similar that moment was to the time the “Let’s go, Brandon” chant was born — when NBC reporter Kelli Stavast heard a crowd of NASCAR fans at Talladega chanting “F*** Joe Biden” and claimed she believed they’d been chanting “Let’s go, Brandon” to cheer on winning driver Brandon Brown.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Caller Feed
Daily Caller Feed
6 w

Male College Athlete Doesn’t Understand Why He Allegedly Was Booted Off Female Track Team, Files Lawsuit
Favicon 
dailycaller.com

Male College Athlete Doesn’t Understand Why He Allegedly Was Booted Off Female Track Team, Files Lawsuit

He’s a man
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 5366 out of 101749
  • 5362
  • 5363
  • 5364
  • 5365
  • 5366
  • 5367
  • 5368
  • 5369
  • 5370
  • 5371
  • 5372
  • 5373
  • 5374
  • 5375
  • 5376
  • 5377
  • 5378
  • 5379
  • 5380
  • 5381
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund