Now well into his second term, President Trump has made energy policy the foundation of his economic agenda—and the results are increasingly visible. While Democrats argue that his tariffs have contributed to higher consumer prices, their focus overlooks a more consequential economic driver: the Trump administration’s unrelenting campaign to expand domestic energy production and infrastructure. Energy prices in the U.S. are falling so sharply that they are more than offsetting any inflationary pressure tied to trade measures. The surge in U.S. energy output under Trump is historic. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), domestic oil production is projected to rise by over 400,000 barrels per day from 2024 to the end of 2025. Natural gas production has also climbed to record highs. These gains are the direct result of deliberate executive action and regulatory overhaul. One of the most consequential moves came on Trump’s first day in office, when he signed several Executive Orders, declaring a National Energy Emergency. By invoking emergency powers under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, the order allowed federal agencies to bypass key provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Trump’s move resulted in previously stalled infrastructure projects advancing rapidly, gaining approval within months rather than years. Trump’s executive actions have sparked immediate legal challenges. Attorneys general in 15 states — including California, New York, and Massachusetts — have filed lawsuits in federal district court, arguing that the emergency declaration infringes on state authority and violates environmental protections. Despite the litigation, the administration remains committed to its energy initiative. Officials insist that expanding energy infrastructure is essential to national security and economic stability. Recently, the Trump administration secured an agreement with OPEC for a 411,000 barrel-per-day production increase over the May–June period. The deal helped bring crude prices down to $61 per barrel — compared to $81 a year earlier. This kind of international coordination, coupled with a domestic drilling surge, has made the United States one of the few advanced economies experiencing energy deflation. Trump’s “energy dominance” policy does not stop at oil and gas — it also marks a sharp departure from prior federal investments in large-scale renewable energy infrastructure. In February 2025, the administration revoked federal approval for the Empire Wind Project, a $2.5 billion offshore wind farm planned for the coast of New York. Days later, the Bureau of Land Management announced a nationwide pause on new federal land leases for wind and solar farms, citing low output, high subsidy requirements, and extremely poor return on investment. Biden-era policies sacrificed reliability for symbolism. While environmental groups and Democratic governors have condemned the moves as reckless and regressive, Trump’s stance is clear: American energy policy must prioritize dependable performance, cost-efficiency, and infrastructure that can deliver under pressure. Trump’s American Energy Exceptionalism Trump’s policy direction is already translating into tangible economic gains. U.S. natural gas prices have stayed below $3 per million BTUs — less than half the global average. That pricing advantage gives American manufacturers a competitive edge, especially in energy-intensive sectors like chemicals, steel, and industrial fabrication. Capital investment is also rising. In early 2025, ExxonMobil announced a $8 billion expansion of its Gulf Coast operations, citing “regulatory clarity” and “energy security” as primary motivators. Projects of this scale don’t merely boost GDP — they create thousands of high-wage jobs, drive demand in steel, cement, and engineering services, and pour billions into local economies across the South and Midwest. Affordable energy also keeps inflation down. While Europe faces energy-driven price spikes, U.S. core inflation has remained below 2.5 percent, largely due to stable domestic oil and gas supplies. That price predictability matters: it translates to lower interest rates, more accessible mortgages, and steady consumer confidence. While Democratic leaders continue to spotlight the cost of imported consumer goods — such as dolls and strollers affected by tariffs — they miss the broader economic shift. Energy prices in the U.S. are falling so sharply that they are more than offsetting any inflationary pressure tied to trade measures. In short, Trump’s energy agenda has insulated the domestic economy from global shocks and positioned the country for sustained growth. The Left may frame Trump’s policies as outdated or hostile to green energy, but the results speak for themselves: stable prices, surging output, rising manufacturing, and renewed energy independence. What Trump is doing with American energy is not just defensible — it’s economically transformative. READ MORE from Gregory Lyakhov: Trump’s New US–UK Trade Deal Puts America First School Choice Is Common Sense for Students The post Trump’s Energy Policies Are Transforming the Economy appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.

On May 12, 2025, 59 white South Africans arrived at Washington’s Dulles International Airport as refugees accepted by the Trump administration. Predictably, America’s liberal elite swiftly denounced the decision, framing it as ideological favoritism. More significantly, their reaction exposed deep political anxieties about acknowledging white victimhood — a truth that challenges progressive narratives about race and oppression. The uncomfortable truth is clear: human suffering knows no ideological boundaries. These refugees are genuine victims fleeing racial violence and systemic persecution. Yet their plight profoundly unsettles progressives, who instinctively dismiss the legitimacy of white victimhood. The same advocates fiercely highlighting persecution of Uyghurs, Rohingyas, or Middle Eastern refugees become dismissive when whites face similar threats. Guardian columnist Gary Younge illustrates this contradiction, declaring that acknowledging white victimhood “undermines genuine struggles against racism,” exposing a selective morality that weakens progressive credibility. The situation in South Africa is undeniably severe. In 2023 alone, AfriForum documented 296 farm attacks and 49 murders, including the brutal killing of farm manager Brendin Horner. Despite this grim reality, South Africa’s ANC government dismisses these incidents as mere criminality, even as it intensifies explicitly anti-white policies). International bodies remain conspicuously silent, fearing diplomatic tensions with South Africa, a pivotal nation in African politics and global forums. Politicians like Julius Malema openly incite violence, chanting “Kill the Boer” — rhetoric protected by South African courts as political speech. Concurrently, President Cyril Ramaphosa accelerates land expropriation without compensation, explicitly targeting white-owned properties and escalating racial tensions. Rather than addressing these concerns, the ANC attacks refugees fleeing to America, blaming them rather than confronting systemic issues fueling emigration. The American left’s response starkly contrasts with their usual advocacy. Prominent liberal figures swiftly condemned the acceptance of these refugees as preferential. Yet, these same voices previously supported Salvadoran MS-13 affiliate Kilmar Abrego Garcia, arguing he deserved a second chance despite credible security risks. Historically, Britain’s stance mirrors this selective empathy. When white Zimbabwean farmers faced dispossession under Robert Mugabe, Britain’s cautious approach prioritized immigration control over humanitarian aid, granting asylum sparingly — a stance echoed in current restrictive immigration policies toward white South Africans. UK immigration policy grants protection to white South African asylum seekers at a mere 22 percent rate. In contrast, refugees from Ukraine, Syria, and Afghanistan receive near-universal acceptance, reflecting geopolitical biases driven by international alliances and security considerations. Most white South Africans thus rely on skilled migration or ancestry visas, representing around 90 percent of South Africans in the UK. These bureaucratic hurdles create prolonged uncertainty, financial strain, and emotional hardship, implicitly directing them away from asylum and underscoring systemic barriers that compound personal struggles. Paradoxically, progressive voices regularly support individuals with extremist backgrounds, invoking human rights to oppose deportations. For instance, progressives vocally opposed deporting Hoda Muthana, an American-born woman who joined ISIS, claiming she deserved rehabilitation. Similarly, radicalized students facing deportation have received extensive defense in the name of tolerance and diversity, starkly contrasting the skepticism toward white South Africans fleeing real threats. South African President Ramaphosa labeled these refugees “cowards,” suggesting they should endure violence instead of fleeing. British columnist Owen Jones echoed this sentiment, branding their acceptance “a dangerous validation of far-right narratives.” White South Africans Buck the Narrative Such selective compassion undermines foundational human rights principles affirmed by Article 14 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the 1951 Refugee Convention, guaranteeing asylum without discrimination. The implications of maintaining selective empathy are severe, undermining global humanitarian credibility and eroding trust in international human rights standards. Ultimately, the left’s reaction to white South African refugees reveals a profound contradiction: compassion is reserved for narratives aligning with progressive politics. This hypocrisy morally compromises Western liberalism. The uncomfortable truth is clear: human suffering knows no ideological boundaries. Until progressives confront this reality, their commitment to human rights remains fundamentally compromised. The legitimacy of their ideals hinges on openly, consistently, and honestly acknowledging uncomfortable truths. READ MORE from Kevin Cohen: Media Focused on South While Cartels Move to the Northern Border Sanctuary Cities: The Dangerous Illusion of Virtue The post South Africa’s Refugees Expose the Left appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.

As we file, Jannik Sinner, the leading Italian tennis player and world No. 1, is playing point for point against the Spanish star Carlos Alcaraz.  If the latter is heir to the immortal Rafael Nadal, the former carries the athletic legacy of Roger Federer. [A]n alliance between tennis and the Roman Church will help recover … religious and cultural supremacy over the political realm. It has been a glorious fortnight for tennis and for Italy in particular, whose resurgence as a tennis power was confirmed prior to the Sinner-Alcaraz match, with the women’s doubles win by the reigning champions at the Internationali, the great Rome Masters 1000, Sara Errani and Jasmine Paolini. Miss Paolini, who by all indications is as beloved in Italy as Sinner, won the women’s singles on Saturday, overcoming American darling and star Coco Gauff in two sets. No doubt the partisan crowd may have added to Miss G.’s nervous tension, she double faulted at least twelve times — we are reporting from afar with tech assistance and it is not the same as being there and some details get lost — which is really excessive even for someone known for having trouble with the serve.  But as Coco herself said, Jasmine had the better game, aggressive and quick and smart and her marvelous smile sure said it all. However, it is my belief that the really important thing here — and this is not to play down the Italian sweep that a Jannik Sinner win will represent — is that the new leader of the Roman Catholic Church, Leo XIV, received the young Italian at the Vatican on one of his off days and clearly they hit if off. A sinner is welcome at the Vatican, the multilingual American indicated, with a play on the Tyrolean’s name.  As it happens, he was returning to the Tour in this tournament, having done a three month penance for a mishap involving a banned substance that unknown to him touched his epidermis during physical therapy. The time off does not seem to have dampened his mastery, it may even have strengthened it as he exercised, skied, prepared his soul brain heart in his mountain village.  He presented the people with a racquet like the one he uses as well as a membership card in the Italian Tennis Federation.  For sure they will find time to hit a few for Robert Cardinal Prevost, as Leo XIV was known just a week ago, is a baseball and tennis fan and looks fit in body no less than soul. Clearly the pope recognized the sincerity of Sinner’s penance, all the more so as he was by all accounts made to pay a price for another’s error; this comes in sharp contrast to the most famous penance in church history, Henry IV’s walk to Canossa where St Gregory VII reluctantly forgave him, perhaps knowing he soon would have to again excommunicate the power-lusting Holy Roman emperor. One may think this was a quarrel of another time, another age.  But the fact is that the competition between the temporal and the religious powers, or if you prefer politics vs. culture, in the sense of what gives society its spiritual cohesion, is not over, never will be as long as there is an aspiration — and a reality — of freedom. The pope’s evident joy at meeting and befriending the young athlete, the latter’s obvious respect and even awe in the presence of the heir to St. Peter is a symptom of the resilience of Western civilization in a time of confusion bordering on nihilism, which of course has encouraged the West’s enemies to seek to destroy or enslave its nations and communities. Sport plays a vital part in our free culture. It cannot be an accident that the United States Tennis Association chose to announce that it would be spending top dollars over the next several years to strengthen the sport by investing in facilities and player development during the Rome tournament. This is long-term deep strategic planning to regain the glories of yore, but surely is also spurred by the Italians’ comparable investments in recent years, which manifestly have paid off handsomely, with Italian tennis at the most popular ever among pros and amateurs, and it has deep benches as well as many at the top of the rankings. Details of the American development surge are not yet available from USTA, but a word of caution: money isn’t everything and neither is central planning; many if not most of the greatest immortals have not been, historically speaking, products of the establishment. (Bill Tilden, a maverick albeit scion of Philadelphia’s upper crust, won the first Rome tournament in 1930.)  However, establishments, such as organized religion and national sports federations, function as useful backstops and standard-setters as well as foils to those who march to the beat of their own drum and choose to walk the road not taken by most. In any event, an alliance between tennis and the Roman Church will help recover and sustain the principle of religious and cultural supremacy over the political realm. That the Church should take the lead on the cultural side is apt, as Catholicism is the leading religion by numbers in the U.S. and tennis is the fastest growing sport following padel and pickleball, which are derivatives invented for densely populated places where space is a premium. There are unknown risks. Religion’s confrontation with political power, that by nature seeks to control all aspects of public and private life, is inevitable. A clash between the American pope and the American president may even have been foreordained. The question is whether the clash will produce constructive compromise or confrontation harmful to both. The former result is a key to saving Western civilization. The latter may warn of decay and doom. As we saw, Leo XIV, is a tennis player, as Jannik Sinner was quick to recognize with admirable, understated and good natured courtesy.  And Melania Trump, the First Lady, made it a personal project during her husband’s first term to renovate the legendary White House tennis court, on whose surface moved Theodore Roosevelt, G. H. W. Bush, and other greats. In the honored tradition of American politics your correspondent sought out his clout for a featherbed as director of White House Tennis but sad to report he never learned to play the D.C. grift game and struck out each time. But the point is elsewhere. It does not take one of those armchair experts who appear on t.v. (talk about grift …) to see what is needed: a Washington Invitational in which pope and president participate in an exhibition match. Or at least sit courtside and discuss Rerum novarum, the 1891 encyclical of Leo XIII that some observers believe inspired Cardinal Prevost in his choice of names.  Surely the prez could gain from listening to a discourse on that great document’s theme. Rule neither by vanity and greed nor accept the bleakness of despair by misery. These are mirror corruptions of the soul and heart, which the low-key, humble, profoundly thoughtful new pontiff might explain for our times.  The president could note that it was another Leo who held off the Huns by means of skillful negotiation when they threatened the West as other barbarians threaten it today. Diplomacy is indispensable; a readiness to rely on power, however, is critical to diplomacy’s success. On the Tennis Court Sinner is a power from the baseline with an astonishing ability to generate pace; and he has a net game too, and speed and reach, and footwork learned on ski slopes. He retrieves almost anything sent to him and returns it with sharpshooter precision. He has the talent of building his point so he can “release the trigger” at the exact moment he will catch his opponent when he “ain’t where he’s oughta be”, causing him to remember the Louis Jordan line “is you or is you ain’t my baby?,” knowing very well that on the court, Jannik Sinner certainly ain’t, nor should he be. (I am quoting here from the wise counsels of one of the top members of the Banneker Racquets, aka the Georgia Avenue Athletic and Social Organization, a key civic institution dedicated to “keepin’ ’em on the courts and out of court,” a formula borrowed from an older civic uplift organization, the Washington Tennis Foundation, now WETF, for education.) In such insights can pope and president find common ground. Sinner’s occupation of Rome has been as efficient as expected, though he had a “scare” in the semis, where New Jerseyan and American hope Tommy Paul got him off his game in the first set and stopped him from building any momentum, 6-1. But he figured Paul out and seized the offensive to take the next two smoothly.  The tougher test had been the match against Francisco Cerundolo (Argentina), who kept their two sets close.  Against the Spanish star Carlos Alcaraz in the forthcoming final, all bets are properly off but Leo XIV’s trust in faith — he is an Augustinian — could be a factor. Faith and works, attention to one’s soul and training, as well as service to those less fortunate or gifted, or even unlucky enough to not be born American: such qualities apply in sports no less than in the leadership of churches and nations. By the time you read this you will have to look for a replay of the Sinner-Alcaraz final, which is okay, it is what I will have done, since I am not there.  Enjoy and admire the great athletes wherever they come from and remember, America is great because it is good, and while trust is a virtue, make sure to verify all deals. With your finger on the trigger. I mean a good grip on your racquet. Update: Well, Alcaraz won, 7-6(5), 6-1. over an exhausted Sinner whose foot reportedly was injured. Thus it goes, and both players played a great tournament and will soon clash again, as early as three weeks hence in the latter rounds of the French Open. Fede, Forza! READ MORE from Roger Kaplan: A Free Africa for Africans Nations Negotiate For a Reason The post Italian Open Tennis: Faith and Racquets in Rome appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.

The China Blueprint: A Biography and China Blueprint By Brad Good (Jack Gold, 206 pages, $20) Novelist Brad Good’s heart is in the right place. He wants the United States to develop a strategy to “reengage” with China in ways that will transform the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) into a less dangerous, less evil regime. He calls it The China Blueprint, and it is based on his years living in China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan, marriage to a Chinese woman, and his psychological portrait of the CCP leadership. He describes it as a political, economic and psychological strategy that is topped-off with “The China Proclamation,” his version of a Declaration of Independence against the CCP.  The China Blueprint certainly would make a good novel, but it is not a realistic geopolitical strategy for dealing with China. [I]t is understandable that he seeks retribution against the villainous CCP, but he should stick to writing novels. The first half of Good’s book is about Good — his move to Hong Kong in 1986, his study of Mandarin, his move to Taiwan in 1987, his travel to Beijing in 1988, his education in the U.S. and abroad (Middlebury College, University of Chicago), back to Hong Kong in 1993, Singapore in 1995, then back to the United States (Los Angeles), back to China in 2017, after which he began dating a woman named “Manman,” eventually marrying her. The couple experienced COVID lockdowns in Shanghai, they traveled to Dali and Yunnan. In the meantime, he had become a successful novelist. The couple moved to Los Angeles, gambled in Las Vegas, and settled in Austin, Texas. Manman got a job at Google. Good worked on his fourth novel — a thriller set in China, and made some good investments. Good’s latest novel, however, began to cause turmoil in their marriage because it negatively portrayed the CCP, which endangered Manman’s family in China. Their marriage became a victim of the CCP. She moved out of their Austin condo, and he left for Taipei, Taiwan. That is the biographical journey that led Good to write The China Blueprint. The CCP wrecked his marriage, so Good wants to wreck the CCP. It is certainly worth wrecking, as long as you don’t start World War III. Good cites the many evils perpetrated by the current CCP leadership — indeed, they form the “Internal Aggressions” and “External Aggressions” of “The China Proclamation,” just as Thomas Jefferson listed the abuses of King George against the colonists in the Declaration of Independence: the repression of free speech; imprisoning dissenters; crimes against humanity committed against Falun Gong practitioners and Uyghurs; the forced abortions of 400 million babies; censorship; the cultural genocide of Tibetans; ubiquitous state surveillance of citizens; denial of religious liberty; facilitating fentanyl trafficking throughout the world; theft of intellectual property; facilitating the worldwide spread of COVID; aggression in the South China Sea; unfair trade practices. It is a damning indictment. It is Good’s strategy that causes one to pause. It is largely a strategy of psychology designed to target what he perceives as the CCP’s greatest weakness: its desire not to be humiliated. He writes: “The China Proclamation will humiliate China. It delegitimizes China’s leadership and will remind both the leaders and citizens of its past” (the “century of humiliation”). This will be “global humiliation” because Good believes that all or most of the countries of the Western world will sign the Proclamation and work together to humiliate the CCP. That might make a good (no pun intended) novel, but it is just that — fiction. The CCP is Not the British Parliament We are not dealing here with King George and a British Parliament, as ruthless as they were at times. We are dealing with the hardened criminals of the CCP leadership. Proclamations and press releases (which Good refers to endlessly) are not going to transform these Lennist-Maoists. And the Western world will not follow the U.S.-lead in lockstep, as Good imagines it will. Good would add to the humiliation, the closing of our embassy in China, the removal of CCP-connected Chinese students from the United States, the embargo of goods made in China, financial sanctions against the CCP leadership, increased Chinese immigration into the U.S. for non-CCP Chinese, the filing of lawsuits against China for fentanyl deaths, prohibiting Chinese ownership of land and assets in the U.S., and revoking birthright citizenship for Chinese babies born in the U.S. All of these “initiatives” will be announced to the world in press releases to further humiliate the CCP. Good’s “blueprint” would make for a good novel (perhaps even a movie), but it lacks the gravitas and realism of, for example, George F. Kennan’s containment strategy or James Burnham’s strategy of liberation — which combined brought about the fall of the Soviet Union. It is a shame what happened to Good’s marriage, and it is understandable that he seeks retribution against the villainous CCP, but he should stick to writing novels and let real strategists figure out how best to deal with the CCP. READ MORE from Francis P. Sempa: Trump Is an American De Gaulle Canada Did Not Make America Great The post A Novelist’s Blueprint for Transforming the CCP appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.

Since Hamas’ grotesque attack against the nation of Israel and the Jewish people on October 7th, Canada has become rife with antisemitism. Unfortunately, the Jew-hatred that has defaced Canadian society is not a mere consequence of the Israel-Palestine Conflict and its most recent outbreak. Furthermore, for over a year and a half, radical Islamic clerics and their adherents have invaded Jewish communities in Montreal. Rather, Canada has been engulfed by antisemitism and Jew-hatred throughout the modern era, due to the fact that, for nearly a decade, the Liberal government’s inadequate migration policy and summary inability to secure Canada’s borders has permitted radical Islamic ideology and fundamentalism to flow freely into Canada. In fact, it is clear that, until Prime Minister Carney and the Liberal government begin to earnestly secure Canada’s borders and prevent the influx of Islamic fundamentalism within Canada, antisemitic violence and Jew-hatred will continue to inundate Canadian society and abuse the fundamental human rights of Canada’s Jews. Firstly, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) itself has confirmed that, since 2015, radical Islamic ideology and extremism have become commonplace in Canada as a result of the Canadian state’s porous borders. In fact, a prominent Islamic school in Canada, the East End Madrassah, was recently forced to issue a public apology after it was exposed for “teaching children that treacherous Jews conspired to kill the Islamic Prophet Mohammed.” Furthermore, since 2015, Islamic terrorism has become increasingly prevalent in Canada, and “nearly a dozen terrorism-related incidents [have occurred] in Canada or abroad involving Canadians” since October 7th 2023 alone. Countless terrorist leaders and people with intimate connections to terrorist organizations, such as Samidoun and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), have been permitted to migrate within the Canadian state and promote their own hellish ideology over the past decade. For example, in 2024, Muhammad Shahzeb Khan, a longtime resident of Canada, attempted to carry out a mass shooting in support of ISIS in New York City, and Shamsud-Din Jabbar, the ISIS terrorist who committed the horrific ‘Bourbon Street Attack’ in New Orleans, was also previously permitted to travel freely between Canada and the U.S.. Even Justin Trudeau, Canada’s previous Prime Minister, was recently forced to admit that “bad actors … have been exploiting [Canada’s] immigration system for their own interests.” The result is that antisemitic hate-crime has become prolific in Canada over the past decade and has skyrocketed by 670 percent since 2023. Furthermore, violent antisemitic hate-crime increased by 208 percent from 2022 to 2023, and 80 percent of Jews in Canada are now “concerned about antisemitism in their communities.” In addition, throughout 2024, Canadian society was forced to endure a record 6,219 antisemitic incidents, or 17 outpourings of Jew-hatred per day. In truth, since 2023, Canada’s Liberal government has permitted Islamist extremists and radicals to prey upon Canada’s Jewish community with impunity. Toronto’s Jewish community, for instance, has been invaded over 300 times by violent mobs of extremists and anti-Israeli bigots. Furthermore, for over a year and a half, radical Islamic clerics and their adherents have invaded Jewish communities in Montreal and clamored for a total genocide of the Jewish people, while swarms of extremists have freely attacked innocent Jews throughout the city. Moreover, gunshots have been fired into multiple Jewish schools and numerous prominent synagogues and schools across Canada have been firebombed. In addition, countless innocent Jewish people, men, women, and children alike, have been viciously attacked, and over 100 Jewish organizations, institutes, and communities across Canada were targeted with a bomb threat, which explicitly stated “you will all end up in a pool of blood … This will be your last day on earth.” Islamic Extremism Migrates Unfortunately, although antisemitism has become endemic in Canada, it is evident that the Jew-hatred is not a mere consequence of the Israel-Palestine Conflict and its most recent outbreak. Rather, Canada has been disfigured by antisemitism throughout the modern era due to the Liberal government’s inadequate migration policy and consistent inability to secure Canada’s borders, allowing Islamic ideology and fundamentalism to flow freely into Canada. Until the Liberal government begins to earnestly secure Canada’s borders, antisemitic violence and Jew-hatred will continue to menace Canadian society. More importantly, it is readily apparent that the Canadian people must begin to confront the uncomfortable reality that, despite their own earnest desire to champion the liberal ideal and embrace a plurality of people within Canadian society, it is impossible for radical Islamic ideology and fundamentalism to exist peaceably within any state that is a home to Jewish people. In truth, any democratic nation that embraces Islamic fundamentalism within its society inevitably courts its own collapse. READ MORE from Will Barclay: Hamas, Not Israel, Has Caused Gaza Suffering Palestinians’ ‘Allies’ Need to Abolish Hamas, Not Israel William Barclay is an award-winning political theorist, as well as a policy expert and private consultant. William’s work has been published by the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, Palgrave-Macmillan, The Hill Times, The American Spectator, and the Journal of Liberty and International Affairs, among others. Follow him on Twitter/X @WillBarclayBBC. The post Immigration, Islamism, and Antisemitism in Canada appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.

Biden Administration Hid Millions of Defaulted Student Loans

NOLA Prison Break is a Product of Progressivism

RINO Removal Project Gaining Steam, Targets 10 RINOs in Congress

My Dad, A 'Good' Death, And The Unforgivable Covid Era

Democrats Show Their True Colors