from SD Bullion: TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/

by Selwyn Duke, The New American: “Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.” This line was uttered, infamously, by Chinese communist dictator and murderer of millions Mao Zedong. It’s also now agreed with by millions of American young people, citizens who don’t see violence as a means to an end. The may […]

JUST IN – New York Governor Kathy Hochul signs Medical Aid in Dying Act, making New York the 13th state in the U.S. to authorize human euthanasia for terminally ill adults, effective August 5 — CBS pic.twitter.com/9flMl1aGLw — Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) February 6, 2026

Grocery shopping has completely changed. READ MORE...

It’s silly, but it really works! READ MORE...

Recently, the Supreme Court heard arguments in two cases about the validity of state laws banning boys from girls sports, West Virginia v. B.P.J. and Little v. Hecox. The lawyers on the trans side bizarrely claimed that puberty blockers erase whatever athletic advantage men who say they are women may have. That’s crazy enough—as the attorneys for the young women pointed out, the male athletic advantage doesn’t begin at puberty, but begins as early as 5 or 6 years of age. But there is something even crazier here, for the presumption seems to be that men have a right to compete in women’s sports unless they have a biological advantage, just because they think they are really women. No. They aren’t what they think they are, and they have no such right. To say what ought to be obvious: Men and women are different. Moreover, women want and need some girls-only activities, and men want and need some boys-only activities. This would be true even if the two sexes were equally big, fast, and strong. We don’t have to pretend that they are the same, and we don’t have to pretend that sexuality is all in our minds, so that I might be a “woman in a man’s body,” a “man in a woman’s body,” or even, as we now sometimes hear, a “lesbian in a man’s body.” If you haven’t heard the last one yet, it refers to a woman who is sexually attracted to other women, but who is trapped in the body of a man. We are passing through a pandemic of lunacy, of dangerous and contagious detachment from reality. It isn’t just young people with gender dysphoria who suffer the harmful delusion that we can be the sex other than what we are. Now, schoolteachers often promote transgender ideology, even to children in the lower elementary grades, asking them, “What are your pronouns?” At the university where I teach, if I were to use the male pronoun for a male student who “identified as” female, I would be roundly condemned. I don’t go out of my way to offend people, so in a case like that, I would avoid pronouns altogether. But for some people, even that isn’t enough. They won’t be satisfied unless I pretend to agree with them. How far does this go? The gender delusion isn’t just about whether we are male or female, or whether men can get pregnant. We are now told that there are up to 95 genders, and the number keeps growing. Some activists suggest not just giving men faux vaginas and women faux penises, but leaving the polarity of male and female behind altogether. They’re for surgically crafting genitals to look like flowers or abstract sculpture. Other activists are pressing for attraction to minors to be considered a gender. Perhaps next in line will be attraction to other men’s wives: “My gender is adulterer.” So far, the weirdest so-called gender is “xenogender,” defined as “a gender “that cannot be contained by human understandings of gender.” If it can’t be, I wonder, then how do we know that it is a gender at all? Nor does the lunacy stop even there. Not only do some people claim to be of a different sex than they are, some now claim to be of a different species than they are. They “identify” as dogs, raccoons, or bunny rabbits, and expect to be treated as such even at school and work—although I don’t think they want to be kept in a cage and fed kibble. And then there are those who think that they have different bodies than they have. Some people “identify as paraplegic” and demand that doctors sever their spines. Articles have appeared in medical journals, seriously discussing whether people who “identify” as having fewer limbs should have some of their limbs amputated. This isn’t “affirming” them. It’s mutilating them. All these delusions are symptoms of a still deeper lunacy. Their root is the notion that true freedom lies in rejecting every limitation, even the very framework of human nature. Every artist knows that to make beautiful things he must honor the laws of his medium, whether paint, stone, or sound. This is also true of the artistry of living, in which the medium in which our lives are etched is human nature itself. We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal.  The post Speaking of Reality: Men Are Not Women appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Am I sexist? I think there are differences between men and women—traits beyond obvious physical ones. But when I was young, feminist leaders said there were no differences. The only reason men ran most things was sexism. There was plenty of that. One example people forget: Until 1974, women couldn’t get a credit card without their husband’s permission. A women’s movement was long overdue. I believed the new “experts” who said, if we raise children in gender-neutral ways, men and women will behave similarly. Then I had kids. Now I understand that boys and girls are just different. But for some reason, we’re not supposed to acknowledge that. “Aren’t women, in general, better nurturers?” I asked Gloria Steinem. “No,” she snapped. “Next question.” Today many people still avoid talking about differences. But not Heather Mac Donald! “If we weren’t so insane, it would be perfectly obvious that there are innate differences,” she says in my new video. She points out that men explored the world, not women. “Their societies wouldn’t allow it!” I say. “That’s true,” she notes, “but they haven’t been doing much in the interim.” “Men drove the Thirty Years’ War … the Hundred Years’ War,” I say. “Maybe it would be better if women managed governments.” “Some of the Green parties, the female dominated parties in Europe, they’re the war parties,” she replies. “They’re all for continuing to arm Ukraine, for involvement in the Serbian conflict … A lot of female EU politicians are no more pacifistic than some of their male colleagues.” She points out that it was men who “developed ideas of constitutional government, due process, human rights. Those are much more powerful than the Thirty Years’ War.” Men, she says, have more “passion for novelty, competitiveness, aggression.” It’s why more inventions are made by men, and businesses started by men. “You have to be a very ideologically dominated parent,” adds Mac Donald, “not to notice that there are differences between male and female children almost from the start, as far as levels of aggression, the types of toys they gravitate towards.” Some of this is not good for men. “Males have a greater predilection towards insanity, towards really stupid behavior. … There’s obviously individual exceptions,” adds Mac Donald. “There’s highly aggressive, competitive females and highly nurturing, empathetic males … But we’re talking averages. The average male, there’s a greater change that he’s going to be a risk taker and seeker of knowledge.” A recent study blames “unconscious bias in the selection process” for the lack of women in CEO positions. But Mac Donald says it’s not sexism that keeps women out of CEO roles. “Nobody’s keeping females out. They just aren’t interested. Google is desperate to hire more females. Nobody’s preventing females from doing an AI startup! … They don’t have that same drive to stay up until 3:00 a.m., eating cold pizza, coding! That drive to conquer facts and data is disproportionately male.” Women, on the other hand, laughs Mac Donald, “They’re influencers! They’re talking about makeup (and) fashion.” Really? Is she saying women are less useful? “They are very useful for raising children,” she answers. She also notes that many women accomplish remarkable things. “George Elliot and Edith Wharton are great novelists,” says Mac Donald. “We’ve got great female composers, Fannie Mendelssohn, Cecile Chaminade, Amy Beach. I want to hear all of them, absolutely! But I am not going to try to tear down an institution because it is predominantly male.” One institution women have harmed, she says, is the university, because its civilizational mission has been compromised by women claiming victimhood. “The claims of ‘unsafety,'” she says, are hysterical neurosis. “You now have portraits of white male scientists being taken down because they might make female medical students feel unsafe.” She says pursuit of knowledge is under threat because women care less about free speech. One study did find 60% of women favor “inclusivity” over free speech, while 71% of men favor protecting free speech. “When you ask either (group), which do you value more? … A vast majority of males choose the pursuit of truth, academic freedom, whatever the cost. The females favor emotional safety and equity.” “So what?” I push back. “Both are good qualities.” “No, they’re not!” she scolds me. “The university exists for the pursuit of truth.”COPYRIGHT 2026 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS INC. We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal.  The post Boys vs. Girls appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Waukegan High School teachers and staff in Chicago, Illinois, led students in a walkout to protest ICE arresting criminal aliens. They carried a perverted, crucified effigy of President Trump, a man who was almost killed in two assassination attempts. They are sacrilegiously defiling the death of Christ. I would like to see them do this […] The post Chicago HS Teaches Kids to Dehumanize Trump & Defile Jesus Christ appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.