Texas and a group of gun rights organizations won a legal victory on Sunday after a federal judge temporarily blocked a gun control rule from the Biden administration regulating private firearm sales.  Federal Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk said that the Biden administration could not implement a policy against Texas or members of multiple gun rights groups that require individuals who “earn a profit” selling guns to conduct background checks and have a federal firearms license no matter where or how they sell their merchandise. In his 14-page ruling, Kacsmaryk said that the rule likely violates the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and was not in alignment with the “Bipartisan Safer Communities Act,” (BSCA) which the Justice Department cited in its justifications for implementing the policy. He said that because of this determination, evaluating the other arguments made against the rule was unnecessary.  “Plaintiffs understandably fear that these presumptions will trigger civil or criminal penalties for conduct deemed lawful just yesterday,” the judge wrote. “Other Plaintiffs face both civil and criminal enforcement actions for engaging in conduct that the BSCA permits but the Final Rule impermissibly forbids.” The decision applies to Texas, the Gun Owners of America, the Gun Owners Foundation, the Tennessee Firearms Association, and the Virginia Citizens Defense League. The judge ruled that Louisiana, Mississippi, and Utah failed to demonstrate standing and did not issue the temporary injunction in their favor.  Republicans have argued that the regulations infringe on Second Amendment rights and would make it a felony for family members and friends to sell guns to each other without conducting background checks or having a federal license.  “I am relieved that we were able to secure a restraining order that will prevent this illegal rule from taking effect,” Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said in response to the ruling. “The Biden Administration cannot unilaterally overturn Americans’ constitutional rights and nullify the Second Amendment.” CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP Gun Owners of America President Erich Pratt praised the decision.  “President Biden and his anti-gun administration have aggressively pursued an agenda meant to harass, intimidate, and criminalize gun owners and dealers at every turn,” he said. “This ruling is a compelling rebuke of their tyrannical and unconstitutional actions that purposely misinterpreted federal law to ensure their preferred policy outcome.” The rule broadly goes into effect on Monday after it faced a flurry of lawsuits. For Texas and the gun rights groups, the rule will be on hold until June 2, pending further litigation. 

A pair of GOP senators introduced a bill on Monday to protect in vitro fertilization (IVF) at the federal level. The goal of the “IVF Protection Act,” spearheaded by Sens. Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Katie Britt (R-AL), is to discourage states from prohibiting access to IVF services. If enacted, the legislation would amend the Social Security Act to require that states do not block IVF services as a condition to receive federal Medicaid funding. “IVF has given miraculous hope to millions of Americans, and it has given families across the country the gift of children,” Cruz said in a statement. Britt said the legislation “affirms both life and liberty — family and freedom, and I look forward to working with my colleagues to enact it into law.” Senate Republicans previously blocked legislation from their Democrat colleagues that would have established a federal right to IVF treatments. The AP reported many GOP lawmakers do not want the federal government to meddle with state-level decisions on reproductive care after Roe v. Wade was overturned. Cruz and Britt stressed in press releases about their new bill that the legislation would not compel any person or organization to provide IVF services. They also emphasized that the “IVF Protection Act” permits states to ensure appropriate “health and safety standards” for practicing the fertilization treatment. Former President Donald Trump, who is running for another term in the White House in this year’s election, has voiced support for IVF as polls show it to be a major issue for voters. In a video last month, Trump praised Alabama for passing a bill to protect IVF services after a state high court ruled frozen embryos should be recognized and protected as unborn children. CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP “We want to make it easier for mothers and families to have babies, not harder,” Trump said. “That includes supporting the availability of fertility treatments like IVF in every state in America.” Pro-life advocates had lauded the Alabama Supreme Court for the ruling that determined the state’s Wrongful Death of a Minor Act applied to frozen embryos. “Each person, from the tiniest embryo to an elder nearing the end of his life, has incalculable value that deserves and is guaranteed legal protection,” Live Action President Lila Rose said.

Kevin Costner said he’s been knocking on doors at the Cannes Film Festival looking for backers to finance the next installments of his country Western passion project. The 69-year-old actor confirmed he put up $38 million of his own money into the project he’s been obsessing over for decades. The first film, “Horizon: An American Saga,” debuted at Cannes over the weekend before its national release on June 28.   “That’s the message I want my kids to understand about who I am: that I do what I believe in,” Costner told GQ of taking such a big risk. “I have fear like everybody else. I don’t want to be humiliated.” The actor also commented on taking out a mortgage on his Santa Barbara home to help finance the project. “I mean, it’s okay, maybe I lose that. But it’s: Have I lost myself?” he told the outlet of making that decision.  Warner Bros. is releasing the first two installments of the project this summer and production has already started on the third despite the second two movies not yet being fully funded.  “They’re going to happen regardless, but they’re not already funded,” Costner said. “I got my suitcase on the end of the street, you know, and seeing: Where are all you brave, rich billionaires? If I hear the word billionaire one more time, I think I’m going to puke.” “I need somebody that’s impulsive, is emotional, has money, and wants to go west,” Costner said of his ideal investors. “And it’s like: Now let’s see how much of a gambler you are. Because everything I have is in the movie.” When asked at a Cannes press conference about his struggle to finance the project, Costner said, “I don’t know why it was so hard.” CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP “You saw the movie. I don’t know why it was so hard to get people to believe in the movie that I wanted to make,” he said, per Variety. “You know, I don’t think my movie is better than anybody else’s movie, but I don’t think anybody else’s movie is better than mine. I don’t go out into the world with something I don’t think is good.” “I’ve knocked on every boat in Cannes to help me,” Costner said of trying to get more financial backers. “‘Oh come, we’ll have a picture.’ No, come get your checkbook out. Let’s talk money!” So far, critics at Cannes have given “Horizon” mixed reviews.

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to wreak havoc on the world, President Joe Biden has hinted at a potential game-changer in his approach to tackling the crisis. In a recent statement, the President suggested the possibility of appointing a Vice President to aid in managing the pandemic. This bold move has sparked curiosity and speculation amongst the public and political circles alike. Let's dive deeper into the potential implications of this suggestion. Firstly, it is important to note that this suggestion is unprecedented in American history. While Vice Presidents have played significant roles in the past, they have never been officially appointed to a specific crisis management task. This raises the question of why Biden would propose such a drastic step at this crucial time. Could it be a sign of desperation or a stroke of genius? NEW: President Joe Biden appears to think he was vice president during the pandemic, says Obama told him to go to Detroit to fix it. Wow, these debates should be fun. For those who don't know, Mike Pence was vice president during the pandemic. "When I was vice president,… pic.twitter.com/iSawVdcOgm — Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) May 20, 2024 One possible reason for this suggestion could be to alleviate the immense pressure and responsibility on the President's shoulders. With the pandemic far from over, the weight of managing the crisis solely may be too much for one person to handle. By appointing a Vice President to take charge of the pandemic response, Biden could free up some of his time and energy to focus on other pressing issues. This would also provide a backup plan in case of any unforeseen circumstances. Moreover, this move could also signal the Biden administration's commitment to a more collaborative and inclusive approach to governance. By involving the Vice President, who is usually seen as a "second in command," in a critical decision-making process, the administration could be setting a precedent for future crisis management strategies. This could also bridge the gap between the executive and legislative branches and strengthen the overall decision-making process. WTH is he talking about, the the moron agreeing with him and shaking his hand??? Hidin Biden, are you saying that OBAMA and you KNEW about the Pandemic BEFORE it arrived???? https://t.co/3al7xEN8IO — Lori (@LJMnNV) May 20, 2024 On the other hand, some experts argue that this suggestion may not be as groundbreaking as it seems. They point out that Vice President Kamala Harris has already been actively involved in the pandemic response, and this proposal may not significantly change her role. However, if the Vice President is given more specific responsibilities and authority, it could significantly impact the administration's approach to the pandemic. Another crucial aspect to consider is who would be the ideal candidate for this role. The Vice President is usually chosen based on their political alignment and ability to complement the President's strengths. However, in the case of pandemic management, other factors such as experience and expertise may also come into play. This decision could also have significant implications for the future of the Democratic party, as the chosen Vice President would be seen as a potential presidential candidate in the future. Additionally, appointing a Vice President to manage the pandemic could also have far-reaching effects on public perception and trust in the government's ability to handle the crisis. With the pandemic being a highly politicized issue, the choice of Vice President and their performance in this role could impact the public's perception of the administration's handling of the pandemic. This could also have implications for the upcoming midterm elections and the Biden administration's overall popularity. In conclusion, Biden's suggestion of appointing a Vice President to manage the pandemic has opened up a new realm of possibilities and raised several questions. While the decision has not been made yet, it has sparked discussions and debates about the role of a Vice President and the potential impact it could have on the pandemic response. Only time will tell if this suggestion will come to fruition and if it will indeed be a game-changer in the fight against COVID-19. What are YOUR thoughts? We want to hear from you! Please comment below to join the discussion. The post The Key to Biden’s Pandemic Strategy: The Potential Role of a Vice President appeared first on The Conservative Brief.

Be sure to look at the night sky on June 3rd to see a somewhat rare event called a large “planetary parade.” The term refers to an alignment of planets. In this case, six are involved—Mercury, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. Some parts of the United States will need binoculars or telescopes to witness the sight, but some will have a clear view of most of the planets with the naked eye. “A planetary alignment is an astronomical event that happens when, by coincidence, the orbits of several of the planets of the Solar System bring them to roughly the same side of the Sun at the same time,” Kate Pattle, a Physics & Astronomy lecturer with University College London, told Glamour UK. “This means that they appear in a line on the sky when we view them from the Earth. In this case, the planets Jupiter, Mercury, Uranus, Mars, Neptune, and Saturn will form a line across the sky, in that order.” New York State will have the best view of the planetary parade. Anyone in the area should head out at 5 am ET to catch the show, which will last until 5:26 am. Only Jupiter, Mercury, Mars, and Saturn will be visible without special equipment. You’ll need high-powered binoculars to see Neptune and Uranus. Technically, the alignment will also include Venus, but it will be too close to the sun to see. The Planetary Parade Is Purely Visual People on the eastern seaboard will have views of a partial planetary parade that day, as well. Floridians should be able to see Jupiter, Mercury, Mars, and Saturn at about 6 am. And those in Ohio can see that same lineup around 5:40 am. The alignment will remain in the sky for about a week. To know more about viewing the planetary parade in your area, you can use the interactive Stellarium website or download the mobile Sky Tonight app. It should also be noted that the alignment is purely visual. The planets are not actually lined up in space, and small planetary alignments are more common than large, which are defined by five or more planets. However, literal planetary alignments do happen—but they are extremely rare. The last full event took place in 949 and the next won’t happen until May 6, 2492. You can find the source of this story’s featured image here. The post A Rare Event Called A “Planetary Parade” Will Soon Take Over The Cosmos, See If You’re In The Path Of Totality appeared first on InspireMore.

Police detained two people of interest as well as a suspected vehicle

'It was a very vulnerable experience'

Scheduled to start in June 3.

His cause of death was not revealed

To every single American, the failure of the IRA is clear