YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #music #tew #tuba #euphonium #tew2026 #militarymusic #armymusic #armyband #band #freedom #concertband #tusab #armyorchestra #orchestra #warmup
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2026 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Night mode toggle
Featured Content
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2026 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

YubNub News
YubNub News
1 y

3 Members of MS-13 Street Gang Plead Guilty in 9 Killings in New York City Suburbs
Favicon 
yubnub.news

3 Members of MS-13 Street Gang Plead Guilty in 9 Killings in New York City Suburbs

NEW YORK—Three high-ranking members of the MS-13 street gang have pleaded guilty to their roles in nine killings involving machetes and guns in the New York City suburbs, federal prosecutors said.Kevin…
Like
Comment
Share
Strange & Paranormal Files
Strange & Paranormal Files
1 y ·Youtube Paranormal

YouTube
Spirit Box sessions at Historic Bridge (CREEPY)
Like
Comment
Share
Strange & Paranormal Files
Strange & Paranormal Files
1 y ·Youtube Paranormal

YouTube
Spirit Box + Estes Method Session At Historic Limestone Bridge Part 2
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y

Trump hints at action on TikTok in ‘not too distant future’
Favicon 
www.brighteon.com

Trump hints at action on TikTok in ‘not too distant future’

Follow NewsClips channel at Brighteon.com for more updatesSubscribe to Brighteon newsletter to get the latest news and more featured videos: https://support.brighteon.com/Subscribe.html
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y

Trump administration to 'likely boot millions of illegal migrants' on day one
Favicon 
www.brighteon.com

Trump administration to 'likely boot millions of illegal migrants' on day one

Follow NewsClips channel at Brighteon.com for more updatesSubscribe to Brighteon newsletter to get the latest news and more featured videos: https://support.brighteon.com/Subscribe.html
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y

‘Not messing around’: Donald Trump to put an end to ‘climate hysteria’
Favicon 
www.brighteon.com

‘Not messing around’: Donald Trump to put an end to ‘climate hysteria’

Follow NewsClips channel at Brighteon.com for more updatesSubscribe to Brighteon newsletter to get the latest news and more featured videos: https://support.brighteon.com/Subscribe.html
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y

How Trump Can Leverage Russian Energy for Peace in Europe
Favicon 
www.theamericanconservative.com

How Trump Can Leverage Russian Energy for Peace in Europe

Foreign Affairs How Trump Can Leverage Russian Energy for Peace in Europe The postwar framework can end Europe’s artificial energy scarcity while giving Americans an edge. The incoming administration has offered strong indications in recent weeks that it is serious about pursuing a settlement to finally end the calamitous war in Ukraine, now entering its third year. But the difficult yet necessary task of bringing the most dangerous conflict on the European continent since 1945 to a close demands a willingness by U.S. policymakers to grapple not just with the military realities unfolding on the battlefronts in Ukraine since 2022, but with the larger geopolitical dynamics that have driven the confrontation between Russia and the West since the end of the Cold War. Prime among these is a longstanding dispute over European energy security that has found the U.S., Russia, and various European states on opposing sides.  These energy wars, if left unaddressed, threaten to cripple Europe for decades to come. But they also present opportunities that can underwrite a sustainable European security order in a way that benefits long-term U.S. interests. The European energy wars are driven by two dueling forces. First, there is the economics of it. Russia is one of the world’s largest energy exporters, and Russian energy products are innately attractive to European energy importers due to persistent market factors including low prices, simplified logistics, and relative abundance of Russian gas. Germany’s postwar ascendance as a global economic powerhouse, not to mention the industrial beating heart of Europe, was fueled by a continuous supply of cheap Soviet and then Russian gas. This arrangement was not only hugely beneficial for Germany but has underwritten the solvency of the entire European project to a degree that cannot be overstated.  But the clear economic benefits of doing business with Russia have always been interlaced with geopolitical concerns emanating from some voices in Washington and NATO’s eastern flank countries; chief among them the argument that Russia’s role as Europe’s major energy supplier renders the EU dependent on Moscow. How exactly this supposed dependence works has never been fully explained, let alone proven. The notion that Moscow can blackmail European leaders into doing its bidding simply by threatening to shut off pipelines into Europe is one of those pyrotechnically impressive ideas that crumbles even under the lightest scrutiny. Gazprom, the Russian state-owned energy giant, cannot renege on a long-term gas contract because of some political disagreement between the Kremlin and Europe without incurring massive financial losses, taking a credibility hit with its other key trading partners like China, and being severed from a highly lucrative European market.  Nevertheless, these two forces—economics and geopolitics—came to a head with the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, spurring Europe to pursue a complete and costly divestment from Russian energy as part of the international sanctions regime imposed on Moscow. It is tempting to conclude that Russia’s total isolation from European energy markets is good for U.S. interests and should continue in perpetuity, but there are additional layers of complexity with which American policymakers will need to grapple after the Ukraine crisis is over.  The U.S. needs a strong EU ally capable of taking greater charge of its own defense, something President-elect Donald Trump is rightly seeking as part of his larger initiative to renegotiate the terms of U.S. engagement with NATO. Yet the current approach, hailed by the Biden administration as a great victory of transatlantic unity, has normalized a state of affairs wherein Europe is more impoverished and less secure than at any point since the EU was founded.  What will it take to reverse this trajectory of decline? It is difficult to the point of infeasibility for the EU and its principal actor, Germany, to recover from its ongoing economic slump, much less sustain long-term economic growth, without repairing to some kind of functioning energy relationship with Moscow. Russia will not be reintegrated into European energy markets while the war is ongoing, but impending peace talks over Ukraine give the Trump administration and European leaders a chance to pursue what Henry Kissinger referred to as linkage-making diplomacy. The prospect of energy normalization between Russia and Europe isn’t just good for European economies—itself no small boon in light of the EU’s economic death spiral—but is one of the West’s major sources of leverage in negotiating an end to a war that Russia is winning. Russia has ably adapted to Western energy sanctions, in part by greatly boosting energy exports to third countries like India that sell refined Russian crude back to Europe at a markup. But there is little question that Moscow would prefer to transact with European customers directly. Discussing these questions as part of a broader framework for relaxing certain sanctions after the war is diplomatically and economically sound.  Any proposal along these lines is sure to run up against the argument that walling Russia off from European energy markets is good because it clears the way for unfettered exports of American LNG Liquefied natural gas (LNG) across the Atlantic. This view fails to reckon with the reality that, while the U.S. can and should advertise its energy products to Europe, it cannot possibly export enough LNG at low enough prices to cover the market share previously occupied by Russian gas. Letting Europe diversify its energy imports would dampen the tension between maximizing LNG exports to Europe and servicing growing demand for LNG at home, advancing Trump’s goal of reducing energy prices for American consumers. It’s also good geopolitics—allowing Russia to reestablish its energy trade with Europe would bite into Moscow’s growing reliance on its Chinese trading partner, adding distance to a Russia-China economic relationship that has soared to new heights as a result of sanctions imposed on Russia by the Biden administration.  Though the current EU leadership speaks of divestment from Russia as a permanent approach, it is easy to imagine that the economic realities which prompted European states to establish a decades-long energy relationship with Russia in the first place will slowly reassert themselves in the coming years as the tremors of the Ukraine disaster recede into the rearview mirror.  The U.S. has a unique opportunity to preempt this development not by strong-arming Europeans into acting against their economic self-interest, but by restarting the Russia-Europe energy trade on terms that benefit the U.S. One approach would be to simply buy Nord Stream 2, a pipeline project between Russia and Germany nixed by Berlin in response to Russia’s invasion. This could accomplish two critical U.S. goals: American entities would receive transaction fees for Russian gas that flows into Europe, allaying concerns of losing market share to the Russians; and U.S. ownership over the pipeline would allow Washington to impose inherent boundaries on Russian geoeconomic influence, conclusively putting to rest any concerns over European “dependence” on Russia. These two benefits, in tandem, have the potential to permanently end the European energy wars on terms beneficial to U.S. economic and security interests.  Trump was correct in noting the political schizophrenia of European elites who demand American military protection from Russia even as they guzzle hundreds of billions of cubic meters of Russian gas. But the solution is neither to tolerate Europe’s complete and permanent security dependence on the United States, something the Trump administration rightly seeks to upend, nor to insist on an economically suicidal energy divestment between Europe and Russia. There is a middle course—one that promotes long-term European stability while advancing American interests—ripe for the taking, and upcoming negotiations over Ukraine provide a generational opportunity to work toward a stable, sustainable transatlantic order that promotes American and European prosperity. The post How Trump Can Leverage Russian Energy for Peace in Europe appeared first on The American Conservative.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y

The Conditions of Mike Johnson 
Favicon 
www.theamericanconservative.com

The Conditions of Mike Johnson 

Politics The Conditions of Mike Johnson  Using a natural disaster to punish political opponents is shameful behavior. For once, Speaker Mike Johnson felt like a big man. Striding across the Capitol on Monday in his business attire, the diminutive Republican from Louisiana was asked if government aid for American victims of the California wildfires should be conditional. “State and local leaders were derelict in their duties,” Johnson was talking tough. “I think there should be conditions on that aid.” Conditions. In other words, retribution. In a time of stark crisis, when Americans of all political leanings were outraged and heartbroken as they helplessly watched the Palisades remade in the image of post-war Dresden, Johnson and a cast of Republicans were busy parsing political currents. There would be no quarter here. No warm overtures to reassure those who have suffered most recently in our alleged United States of America. After all, California is not Israel.  More than $18 billion of aid has been sent to Israel since the terror attacks on October 7, 2023, and nary a word of complaint from Johnson and his Republicans. The best they could do is work to separate Israel’s funding from that of Ukraine and ensure a quicker, more robust passage of aid to the Knesset. In fact, every member of the House GOP except the unbending Rep. Thomas Massie spent the Friday before the LA fires signing off on legislation to sanction International Criminal Court officials who issued an arrest warrant for Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. In our nation’s capital, it was business as usual. Massie, Kentucky’s whiz kid who holds a soft spot for regenerative farming and the Constitution, voted “present” on the bill and watched as 198 Republicans voted in one voice to protect their favorite politician not named Donald Trump—Netanyahu. Massie’s reasoning was plain as day. “The ICC has no authority over the United States,” Massie wrote following the vote. “We should not get involved in disputes between other countries. Focus on America.” The last sentence is a promise that Republicans, even the chest-pounding MAGA types, struggle tirelessly to make good on—“Focus on America.” Johnson wanted the Democrats in California to bend to his will. He wanted swift punishment. The loudest of the MAGA right, the ones who have been screaming, incessantly, for several days now that the fires and the inability of crews to put them out lie squarely at the feet of LA Mayor Karen Bass, Gov. Gavin Newsom, and the lesbian who runs the LA fire department, were all in agreement. It was DEI run amok. It was empty neighborhood fire hydrants that had yet to be retrofitted to fight 20,000 acres of fire burning simultaneously. More than anything, it was the fault of the Democrat voters and their Democrat mayor who just so happened to be across the world on a humanitarian mission in Ghana. Mismanagement was the word of the week, and everyone was saying it.  In a moment of sheer misery for our Californian neighbors, the Republicans did what they often do—they mocked, they whined, and instead of finding commonality, they incited a rabble that had suddenly become experts in a subject matter none of them knew a thing about until about an hour after the first flames curled its way through the hills above Los Angeles. “There’s a lot of members that aren’t there yet on just exactly what this would look like,” Republican Rep. Scott Fitzgerald said, echoing Johnson during an interview with Maria Bartiromo of Fox News on Tuesday morning. “I’m sure there is gonna be some things tied to any aid that’s gonna make its way to California.”  This is the same Fitzgerald who toured Jerusalem, met with Netanyahu, and featured in an AIPAC video pledging his unabashed support for Israel amid its 15-month bombing campaign of Gaza. In the video released by AIPAC in 2024, Fitzgerald said he made the trip to Israel because “we stand strong with Israel and support Israel in whatever form that takes.” Whatever form that takes—in other words, without conditions. Fitzgerald has yet to make the trip to California to see the devastation wrought on our own people or pledge the same sort of unblinking support for its residents. Such is the game in Washington. The fires had yet to be slowed before Johnson began pointing fingers.  “Obviously, there has been water resource management, forest management, mistakes, all sorts of problems, and it does come down to leadership, and it appears to us that state and local leaders were derelict in their duty, and in many respects,” Johnson declared from his high perch in Washington 2,300 miles from ground zero. “So, that’s something that has to be factored in.” Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso of Wyoming went further in his open admonishment of California’s leadership. “I expect that there will be strings attached to money that is ultimately approved, and it has to do with being ready the next time, because this was a gross failure,” Barrasso said Saturday.  When President Joe Biden attempted to slow arms shipments to Israel in May 2024, Barrasso was downright apoplectic. He said Biden should “be ashamed” of doing what was in his power to end the slaughter of civilians in Gaza. He called Israel “one of our nation’s closest allies.” No such strongly-worded missive dismissing the hardened battle cries of his Republican colleagues who are attempting to tie California aid to an increase in the U.S. debt limit could be found on Barrasso’s senate page this week. On the topic of Californians, some of whom undoubtedly voted for his party in the 2024 election, Barrasso was adamant: “There can’t be a blank check on this.” No blank checks, “on this.” A Congress that has handed down blank check after blank check these last 25 years, suddenly, when our actual countrymen needed them the most, would finally find its fiscal backbone. If there has been one uniting thread among our partisan political theater this last quarter century, it has been the blank check. Republican senators and Democrat Representatives have written blank checks to fund our disgusting war machine, to prop up ridiculous Covid measures, to aid in Israel’s destruction of Gaza, and to lift up every other American city and community affected by natural disasters not named Los Angeles. In fact, Johnson’s home state of Louisiana received more than $75 billion, almost three times the size of the state’s annual budget, in federal aid in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. No conditions, of course. As New Orleans filled to the brim with water, Congress readily opened its purse. When Republican Speaker Dennis Hastert, later convicted of sexually abusing a child, loudly protested federal spending to rebuild parts of New Orleans, both Republicans and Democrats condemned the Illinois politician, who quickly amended his criticisms. This was still America, our America. And we all lived in it. “Never in California did we question whether or not we, as taxpayers in the largest state in the Union, should support the people of Louisiana at a time of emergency and need,” Newsom said in response to Johnson’s comments on Thursday.  “We’d never condition it.”  Then Newsom made a direct plea to both Trump and Johnson: “Millions of your supporters are out here. They need your help, they need your empathy, they need your care. Whatever compassion you can express, as opposed to condemnation and divisive language that has abetted nothing except mis and disinformation that has flamed fear and anxiety for folks that are just trying to recover.” But compassion is not the nature of firebreathers and the most aggrieved members of the GOP caucus showed no signs of relenting their round-the-clock assault on California’s politicians and the hapless, hopeless Angelenos who lost everything last week.   Speaking on Fox News Thursday morning, North Carolina Sen. Ted Budd protested unconditional aid for California residents reeling from the fires. Months after Hurricane Helene tore through his own state, Budd went for pure politics, suggesting that outgoing President Biden and the Democrats cared more about funding Southern California relief because its residents voted blue. Never mind the uncomfortable truth that the same Pacific Palisades neighborhood that was reduced to rubble by the fires voted for billionaire Republican mayoral candidate Rick Caruso over Karen Bass by an astonishing margin of 62–38 in 2022. What have facts got to do with it? Budd, who grew up on a chicken farm and owns a gun store, has no applicable background in forest management or firefighting. That didn’t stop him from suggesting the fires could have been easily satiated if not for the Democrats in charge. “They’ve accumulated decades and decades of bad leadership of something that could be controlled but you can’t control a hurricane in Western North Carolina,” Budd said as a Fox News host hummed along in agreement. “One could’ve been prevented with good government, one could have not.” There were a few Republican stragglers who found within themselves a moral compass among the wreckage. Thom Tillis, the senior senator from North Carolina, saw clearly what Budd could not. In a statement that might as well have been aimed directly at Budd, Tillis implored his colleagues to see themselves in those Californians who had suffered nature’s wrath. “I would ask those folks to put themselves in the same position as people of western North Carolina,” Tillis told HuffPost. “You got to be consistent on disaster supplement, period.” Florida Sen. Rick Scott, another politician from a consistently storm-ravaged state, also backed providing unconditional aid to Californians: “I think we ought to do aid the way we do everybody else.” The question of what preventative measures, if any, could have stopped the fires has masked attacks disguised as discussion this past week, especially on Elon Musk’s ?. In the midst of all the mudslinging was some stark honesty from the most unconventional of places. In the days following the first flames, a clip from podcaster Joe Rogan went viral on the platform in which the UFC announcer recounted a conversation he had with a firefighter who warned that under the worst conditions, nothing could be done, regardless of who was in charge, to stop a city-wide fire event.   “He said, ‘Dude, one day it’s just going to be the right wind and the fire is going to start in the right place and it’s going to burn through LA all the way to the ocean and there’s not a f—king thing we can do about it,” Rogan said. “We just get lucky, we get lucky with the wind. But if the wind hits the right way, it’s just going to burn through LA.” Experts hashing out the early data from the LA fires all agree on one thing—the wind went the wrong way, and fast. What happened in Los Angeles last week was essentially a hurricane of fire. A perfect storm in the most imperfect of ways as the Santa Ana winds steamrolled the hillsides surrounding Los Angeles. Gusts of more than 100 mph were recorded at the height of the storm to create an apocalyptic nightmare. One video captured during the disaster showed a tornado of fire driving along a ridgeside above the Palisades. No one—not the bumbling Newsom or Speaker Johnson’s empowered brat pack—could’ve stopped the wrath laid at the doorstep of America’s Angelenos, no matter who they voted for. Speaking before Congress on Wednesday, California Rep. Mike Levin was incensed by those who would seek to twist California’s cruel fate into a political quagmire:  Some House Republicans are threatening to withhold disaster aid to California unless certain unknown conditions are met. My friends, this could be your state. Never in our nation’s history has the federal government placed such politically-driven conditions on disaster aid to its own citizens. This is a bad faith effort to use California as a punching bag. It’s unacceptable and downright shameful to use the suffering of Californians in need or anyone in need to solve your internal political disputes. It’s not easy to find agreement with Democrats, especially the California types who are among the most progressive flamethrowers in America. But listening to Levin’s heart break as his GOP counterparts argued for conditional aid purely due to the political disagreements they share with the Democratic caucus left me wondering what exactly it means to be an American. The same men who have rubber stamped every dime Israel asked for these last 15 months had suddenly found a fiscal spine and it was Americans who would bear the first burden. Go figure.  Such are the conditions of Mr. Mike Johnson and his Republican caucus. For Israel, anything. For our brothers and sisters in California, a miserable lesson in voting blue. Here’s hoping that, when the next natural disaster befalls a red state in our America, it’s not the Democrats wielding the national purse. The post The Conditions of Mike Johnson  appeared first on The American Conservative.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y

David Lynch’s Popularity Is a Judgment Against Us
Favicon 
www.theamericanconservative.com

David Lynch’s Popularity Is a Judgment Against Us

Culture David Lynch’s Popularity Is a Judgment Against Us The universal acclaim for the Montanan master of the cheap shot says more about us than about him. Credit: Drop of Light/Shutterstock The decades-long valorization and near-deification of the late filmmaker David Lynch is a sign of declining cultural standards and decaying societal values. Long ago, the public flocked to films by directors whose artistic visions, however distinct or personal, affirmed humanity’s best intentions: John Ford saluted American history; Frank Capra pledged allegiance to the American spirit; Leo McCarey celebrated the church.  Lynch, who died last week at age 78, can be said to have emerged from the same tradition only to degrade it openly. A native of Missoula, Montana, whose youth included stints in Idaho, North Carolina, and Virginia, Lynch was deeply familiar with the rhythms, inhabitants, and colloquialisms found in middle America, but in several of his best-known films and TV shows, including Blue Velvet, the Twin Peaks series, and its various offshoots, he used his cultural context as mere fodder for gruesome violence, graphic sexuality, and repellant sarcasm. Again and again, he presented the superficial order and courtesies of small-town America as a cover for the sordid and profane. That Lynch nonetheless persisted in presenting himself, in interviews and appearances, as a darn-tootin’ everyman a la mode du Tim Walz reveals either his cynicism—his persona was part of the joke—or his complete lack of self-awareness. The comedian and filmmaker Mel Brooks, who produced Lynch’s 1980 film The Elephant Man, coined a famous description of his protégé: Jimmy Stewart from Mars. With all due respect to Brooks, this characterization does a disservice to both Jimmy Stewart and to Mars: Stewart would never have wanted to be associated with the maker of movies as unseemly as Blue Velvet, and Martians, were they to encounter Lynch’s generally inscrutable films, would stand no better chance of comprehending them than ordinary Earthlings. Lynch’s many defenders will point to his facility with filmmaking technique. Undeniably, Lynch could conjure unsettling moods, but he was not a natural or fluid filmmaker. Instead of orchestrating images and angles in furtherance of a story—the definition of directing as once given to me by Peter Bogdanovich—Lynch tended to settle on a single bothersome image for its own sake: the severed ear in Blue Velvet, or the smiling face of Robert Blake in Lost Highway, or the monster-like entity behind the dumpster in Mulholland Drive. In his 1992 film Twin Peaks: Fire Walks With Me, Lynch played a hearing-impaired FBI official named Gordon Cole who barks. his. lines. in. a. staccato. fashion. that. has. no. dramatic. justification. Here Lynch betrayed his background as an art-school product: These images and moments would have been no less meaningful if ripped from their films and stuck on a gallery wall or presented as a part of a so-called “video installation.” Surrealism is a valid artistic mode, but when does a preference for the randomly weird signal a retreat from the real world?  Lynch aimed to perturb (or, more often, shock), but never to elucidate. Most of his films are literally incomprehensible, and if earnest effort is expended to identify a theme, it will generally end with a pedestrian platitude. Perhaps the industrial wasteland that provides the setting of Lynch’s 1977 debut film Eraserhead is a commentary on the defilement of the natural world, and maybe the shifting identities of several characters in his 2001 Hollywood soap opera Mulholland Drive is a statement about the multiple natures that exist within each one of us. But if such meaning can be extracted from these opaque movies, it proves only that Lynch was, deep down, a profoundly unoriginal thinker who cloaked his unoriginality in puzzles and pretension. As Roger Ebert put it when writing of the depraved behavior of the characters in Blue Velvet: “What are we being told? That beneath the surface of Small Town, U.S.A., passions run dark and dangerous? Don’t stop the presses.”  In truth, Lynch seems unlikely to have been driven by ideas as much as impulses. He spoke of conceiving whole films on virtual whims—as when he said he got the idea for the Dennis Hopper character in Blue Velvet by seeing a random stranger walk to the counter at a Bob’s Big Boy restaurant. Uh-huh. Such anecdotes, usually relayed with a wry smile by their teller, fed into Lynch’s guru-like status. To become a fan of Lynch’s movies meant becoming conversant with their maker’s entire shtick, including his straitlaced manner of dress, his ceaseless cigarette-smoking, and his hokey kernels of wisdom. His YouTube channel used to feature him squawking out weather reports from Greater Los Angeles. This was no mere movie director, but a sage for those in search of one—like Ayn Rand or Bob Dylan.  Lynch has been revered for so long—he was given an Honorary Oscar in 2019—that the truly indefensible awfulness of his worst films has been forgotten. He scorned his 1984 adaptation of Dune only because he lacked complete control over it; he never apologized for its utter ugliness and total tedium. Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me was described this way by the New York Times critic Vincent Canby: “Its 134 minutes induce a state of simulated brain death, an effect as easily attained in half the time by staring at the blinking lights on a Christmas tree.” Hear, hear. For years, the Chicago Sun-Times critic Roger Ebert was the most committed detractor of Lynch. In invigoratingly censorious terms, Ebert objected to both the content of Lynch’s films and their director’s glib attitude towards that content. “He wants to deal with the most shocking possible imagery—he wants to deal with subject matter that involves violence and images that are sure to absolutely repel the audience—and then he wants to always end with a punchline that’s a joke,” Ebert said in his review of the truly horrendous 1990 film Wild at Heart. Indeed, Lynch displayed deep knowledge of the adolescent sensibility by always encouraging derisive laughter at extreme situations. Alas, Ebert backed off his critical stance of Lynch when reviewing his best film—the G-rated Disney release The Straight Story (1999), about an Iowan who takes to his tractor to visit his faraway dying sibling—and, disappointingly, the universally-admired Mulholland Drive. (Full disclosure: I once recorded an appreciative audio commentary for a Blu-ray release of The Straight Story—a nice little movie.) Lynch either outlived his increasingly lonely detractors or, in the case of Ebert, finally coopted them. He might have started out as a stranger in a strange land, but given the depth and breadth of his fan club, those who dissent are the ones left out in the cold. R.I.P. The post David Lynch’s Popularity Is a Judgment Against Us appeared first on The American Conservative.
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
1 y

Directed Energy Weapons 101: Sonic, Microwave, Laser, & Non Lethal Warfare. ClimateViewer
Favicon 
api.bitchute.com

Directed Energy Weapons 101: Sonic, Microwave, Laser, & Non Lethal Warfare. ClimateViewer

Directed Energy Weapons 101: Sonic, Microwave, Laser, & Non Lethal Warfare. ClimateViewer - (((WATCH THIS BEFORE MY UPCOMING DEEP DIVE INTO DEWs, WILDFIRES AND THE POSSIBLE TECHNOLOGY USED TO CAUSE SUCH FIRES))) - 26,903 views July 5, 2018 ClimateViewer *** TheWarAgainstYou: January 17, 2025 - Regardless of What the Mainstream News, Government Officials or Politicians Say About Directed Energy Weapons. - No Matter How Much They Deny, Attempt to Debunk, or Ridicule those Who Discuss the Subject, THE EXISTENCE OF DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS CAN NO LONGER BE DENIED. - Nor can Anyone Be Ridiculed or Accused of Being Crazy For Talking About DEWs. - The Military From Many Countries Have OPENLY Stated Publicly That They Have Such Weapons and That They ARE IN USE. Even Providing Video Examples, Documentation, and News Briefings. - There are Many Different Types of Directed Energy Weapon Technologies, With a Wide Range of Capabilities and Applications. - Before Anyone Talks About or Shares Claims or Video Evidence Publicly, THEY SHOULD LEARN WHAT IS PUBLICLY KNOWN ABOUT THESE TECHNOLOGIES AND WHAT THEY ARE CAPABLE OF "FIRST". - There Are Far Too Many Wild, Unfounded Claims and Theories that Bounce Through Internet Everywhere you turn. - Understandinh Some of the Basics will help to determine what is likely to be True or False. And What is the Likely Explanation. And it will help Stop Bogus Disinformation that Harms the Credibility of those Reporting Verifiable Facts. When such News or Reports are Shared Publicly, THEY SHOULD INCLUDE OR HAVE LINKS TO CREDIBLE SOURCES THAT PROVES THE TECHNOLOGY IS AN ESTABLISHED FACT. - JIM KEE GIVES A GREAT BRIEF PRESENTATION ON THESE DIFFERENT TYPES OF TECHNOLOGIES AND WEAPONS *** READ THE REFERENCES: https://climateviewer.com/2018/07/05/... - ClimateViewer News (blog) https://climateviewer.com/ ClimateViewer 3D (map) http://climateviewer.org/ - Weather Modification History (timeline) https://weathermodificationhistory.com/ - - About Jim Lee "The ClimateViewer Guy" https://climateviewer.com/about/ ATTACK IDEAS, NOT PEOPLE! https://climateviewer.com/propaganda/ - LIKE US!   / climateviewer     / weathermodificationhistory   FOLLOW ME:   / rezn8d     / rezn8d   - SUPPORT CLIMATEVIEWER! https://www.gofundme.com/fixmythyroid   / climateviewer   https://www.paypal.me/climateviewer PLEASE SUBSCRIBE    / jimlee-climateviewer      / r3zn8d   JOIN OUR CHAT: https://discord.com/invite/SnCG4Wm - FAIR USE FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES MIrrored From: https://www.youtube.com/@climateviewer
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 57291 out of 115280
  • 57287
  • 57288
  • 57289
  • 57290
  • 57291
  • 57292
  • 57293
  • 57294
  • 57295
  • 57296
  • 57297
  • 57298
  • 57299
  • 57300
  • 57301
  • 57302
  • 57303
  • 57304
  • 57305
  • 57306
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund