Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivers a strong and defiant message following the brutal execution of six Israeli hostages by Hamas. “We will not make any further concessions to Hamas after they shot six hostages in the back of the head,” Netanyahu declares, setting the record straight. Despite multiple generous offers from Israel, Hamas has consistently […]

The US seized the airplane, a Falcon 900EX, of Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro while it was in the Dominican Republic. The airplane, the “Air Force One” of Venezuela, was seized for Maduro’s violations of US sanctions. Maduro was not on the $13 million plane, which is now in Florida as US officials scour it for […] The post US Seizes Venezuelan Dictator Maduro’s Presidential Plane appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

Stephen King was dragged on social media after he made an overly-broad claim about how more than two dozen of his books were supposedly banned throughout the state of Florida. In a post on Sunday on X, the 76-year-old horror author claimed that “Florida has banned 23 [of] my books. What the f***?” It later went viral, with more than 14 million views at the time of this publication. However, as many pointed out in the responses, none of King’s books have been completely banned in the state. Rather, Florida passed legislation in 2022 that prevents “sexually explicit material” from being in school libraries and seeks to ensure there are only age-appropriate books. “Babe, elementary school kids don’t need to be reading ‘The Shining.’ It’s not personal. It’s parenting,” one person wrote, referring to one of King’s works. Another added, “Removing books from a SCHOOL library [because] they may not be appropriate for the age group is NOT a ban Mr. King. The parents can go to a public library in town or any bookstore in FL and purchase or check out any book they would like including yours. You have a robust vocabulary and know the definition of the word ban. You should use it, sir.” Florida has banned 23 pf my books. What the fuck? — Stephen King (@StephenKing) August 31, 2024 “You’re lying. Some of your books that contain explicit sexual material were removed from elementary schools,” a third person wrote. “But let’s talk about why you’re mad about this… Do you think it’s appropriate for children to read about orgies?” Florida Department of Education spokesperson Sydney Booker also disputed the book banning claim, stating, “There are no books banned in Florida. Sexually explicit material and instruction are not suitable for schools,” Newsweek noted. The horror author previously was trashed by online users when he encouraged kids to find and read books that had been removed from school libraries. “I’m not sure Stephen understands how creepy this is, considering the materials that are being restricted are openly pornographic,” Nick Frietas, a Republican member of the Virginia House of Delegates, agreed.  “Does this include pornography? Because I’m pretty sure parents don’t want you telling their children to access pornographic material.” Stephen Miller, former senior adviser to President Trump said. “Periodic reminder that when they accuse us of ‘banning books’ they’re referring to graphic books containing pornographic content. Stephen King wants your kids to have access to these books in school,” Libs of TikTok shared. Related: Stephen King Roasted For Blaming ‘The Marvels’ Failure On ‘Adolescent Fanboy Hate’: ‘Maybe The Movie Just Sucks?’

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the cost of food for your Labor Day barbecue has skyrocketed since the Biden-Harris administration took office in January 2021. Here are the numbers reflecting how much typical barbecue food has soared under the Biden-Harris administration: Ground beef, up 26%; hot dogs, up 25%; chicken, up 23%; biscuits, up 28%; beer, up 16%; lettuce, up 21%, and condiments, up 24%. Labor Day barbecues are more expensive than ever thanks to to the failed economic policies of Kamala Harris: ?Beef: 26%??Hot Dogs: 25%??Chicken: 23%??Biscuits: 28%??Beer: 16%??Lettuce: 21%??Condiments: 24%? pic.twitter.com/Io4GeMcNUf — Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) September 2, 2024   On January 2021, when former President Trump left office, the inflation rate rested at 1.4%. The inflation rate immediately began a dizzying ascent with the advent of the Biden-Harris administration, rising from 2,6% in March 2021 to 4.2% in May 2021, to 5.4% in July 2021, to 6.2% in October 2021, to 7% in December 2021, to 8.5% in March 2022 to 9.1% in June 2022. It was only two and a half years into the Biden-Harris administration, in June 2023, before the inflation rate fell back down to 3.0%. “Based on estimates from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, the inaptly-named Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, and the 2021 Thrifty Food Plan Re-evaluation combined to increase federal spending by trillions in fiscal years 2021 and 2022,” the United States Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry, noted in early March. “At a time when the economy was still recovering from COVID-19 supply chain disruptions, this rapid and significant influx of funding overheated consumer demand and contributed to historic inflationary pressure across the entire U.S. economy.” “Led by food, transportation, energy, and housing costs, consumer prices have increased nearly 20% since January 2021. The cumulative impact of inflation over the last 37 months is the highest pace of inflation of any administration since President Carter was in office,” the committee continued. In May, CNN’s Erin Burnett said to President Biden, “Grocery prices are up 30 percent, more than 30 percent since the beginning of the pandemic, and people are spending more on food and groceries than they have at any time really in the past 30 years. I mean, that’s a real day-to-day pain that people feel.” “The fact is that, if you take a look at what people have, they have the money to spend,” Biden responded.

“Yellowstone” fans finally got their first peek at what the last season of the hit Paramount series will look like following the departure of Kevin Costner from the show. In a 30-second teaser clip shared by the Paramount network on YouTube, a voice over of Costner can be heard while images of the Dutton family and ranch come across the screen, giving audiences an idea what to expect when the second half of Season 5 comes out in November — two years after the first half of Season 5 debuted, the Hollywood Reporter reported. “Legacy … we build something worth having, someone’s going to try and take it,” Costner, who played head of family character John Dutton, said. We then hear Jaime Dutton’s character (played by Wes Bentley) issue a warning to rival sister Beth Dutton (played by Kelly Reilly), “You destroy me, you destroy yourself.” Reilly’s character replied, “Unlike you, I keep my promises.” The trailer dropped days after reports surfaced that Reilly and co-star Cole Hauser could be staying on board for another season despite all the reports that the original Dutton story with Costner will end after part 2 of season 5, THR noted. Paramount has yet to respond to the report. The “Waterworld” star previously told GQ that a scheduling conflict had nothing to do with his departure from the series amid reports that blamed him for halting production on the second half of the season due to filming for his western movie “Horizon: An American Saga-Chapter 1,” followed by the writers’ and actors’ strikes, as previously reported. “They still haven’t shot it. As far as I know,” the actor said. “The scripts never came. And so then, at one point, they said to me that we don’t have an ending or anything.” Costner said he offered options for killing off his character so he could make both work, saying, “‘Well, if you want to kill me, if you want to do something like that,’ I said, ‘I have a week before I start. I’ll do what you want to do.’” The “Dances with Wolves” star said despite everything that has happened, he would be open to returning to the series, Deadline noted. Paramount released a statement later to Fox News about Costner’s GQ comments and said that “Kevin has been a big part of ‘Yellowstone’s’ success.” “While we had hoped that we would continue working with him, unfortunately, we could not find a window that worked for him, all the other talent, and our production needs in order to move forward together,” the statement read. “We respect that Kevin has prioritized his new film series and we wish him the best.” The “Yellowstone” series focuses on the “Dutton family who controls the largest contiguous cattle ranch in the United States. Amid shifting alliances, unsolved murders, open wounds and hard-earned respect — the ranch is in constant conflict with those it borders — an expanding town, an Indian reservation, and America’s first national park,” THR noted. Related: Kevin Costner’s Second Part Of Western Saga Pulled From Theaters Ahead Of August Release

In a bold move that underscores Elon Musk's defiance against governmental control, Starlink, the satellite internet service operated by SpaceX, refused to comply with a Brazilian court order to block access to X (formerly known as Twitter). This decision has thrust Musk and his tech empire into a fierce legal battle with Brazilian authorities, raising critical questions about the limits of corporate power and freedom of speech in the digital age. The controversy erupted when a Brazilian court issued an order for Starlink to block access to X following the platform's refusal to remove content deemed unlawful by the government. The court's directive was part of a broader effort by Brazilian authorities to crack down on disinformation and harmful content spread on social media, particularly as the nation grapples with politically charged rhetoric ahead of the 2024 elections. Despite the legal mandate, Starlink did not comply, effectively allowing X to remain accessible to its users in Brazil. https://x.com/iamnot_elon/status/1829993097725444569 Musk’s decision to keep X online through Starlink has drawn sharp criticism from Brazilian officials, who argue that the tech billionaire is undermining the rule of law. Justice Alexandre de Moraes, a prominent figure in Brazil's Supreme Court, condemned Starlink's non-compliance as a "blatant disregard" for the nation's legal system. De Moraes, who has been leading the judicial efforts to combat online disinformation, suggested that Starlink’s actions could lead to severe penalties, including hefty fines and potential restrictions on its operations in Brazil. However, Musk, who has positioned himself as a champion of free speech, defended the decision, framing it as a stand against government overreach. In a series of posts on X, Musk argued that the court's order represented a dangerous precedent for censorship, one that could stifle open discourse on crucial issues. He emphasized that Starlink's mission is to provide uncensored internet access to all, regardless of government mandates. "Freedom of speech is a fundamental right," Musk tweeted, "and we will not comply with orders that violate this principle." https://x.com/Model3Owners/status/1828803246074540484 This standoff has sparked a heated debate over the balance between free speech and regulatory control in Brazil. While Musk's supporters praise his defiance as a necessary pushback against authoritarianism, critics warn that his actions could embolden other tech companies to flout legal obligations, potentially leading to a breakdown in the enforcement of laws designed to protect public safety and order. The situation is particularly tense given the political climate in Brazil. The country is deeply divided, with social media playing a significant role in shaping public opinion and influencing the upcoming presidential election. The Brazilian government has been ramping up efforts to curtail the spread of misinformation, which has been blamed for fueling political violence and undermining trust in democratic institutions. By refusing to comply with the court order, Starlink is not only challenging Brazil's legal authority but also potentially exacerbating the political tensions in the country. Legal experts are closely watching how this conflict will unfold, as it could set a significant precedent for the regulation of internet services provided by foreign companies. If Brazil decides to impose sanctions on Starlink, it could signal to other nations that they too can take a hard line against tech giants that refuse to adhere to local laws. Conversely, if Musk's defiance goes unpunished, it may encourage other companies to resist governmental controls, potentially leading to a new era of digital anarchy. The stakes are high for both sides. For Musk, the outcome could either bolster his image as a free speech advocate or tarnish it by portraying him as a corporate mogul who disregards the sovereignty of nations. For Brazil, the situation is a test of its ability to enforce its laws in the face of powerful international corporations. As the legal battle intensifies, the world is watching to see whether Brazil will stand its ground or if Musk's Starlink will emerge victorious in this high-stakes showdown. The post Musk’s Starlink Defies Brazilian Court Order to Block X, Sparking Legal Showdown appeared first on The Conservative Brief.

'Slam-dunk case'

'The discovery of the statue of Diana was an exciting moment'

NBC News Issues Correction After Kristen Welker Makes False Claim