New Trump Ad: Kamala's Weakness Is Too Dangerous for America

One Year Ago: Jake Sullivan Said Middle East Was at Peace

Monday’s White House press briefing was otherwise uneventful with plenty of process questions about the fallout from Hurricane Helene and concerns about Middle East tensions (which would grow Tuesday with Iran’s missile attacks), but Doocy Time brought the heat with challenging questions on dangerous illegal immigrants and how President Biden and Vice President Harris spent their weekend as untold numbers perished in North Carolina and the surroundings areas. “13,000 people who have been convicted of murder crossed the border illegally and are living among us. So how much danger are you U.S. communities in right now because of this,” Doocy began, citing data from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).     Jean-Pierre went down the route she did in June following a number of videos showing President Biden in states of confusion over in Europe, insisting they were all lies. Uh — so, just a couple of things and I think it’s important to — to correct the record here. Uh — first of all, the false — there — the false representation of the data — uh — I shared, so that was what we are seeing — false representation. I got to call that out. We got to call that out and it’s been fact checked by some of your colleagues here by multiple — multiple — uh — multiple — um — outlets that has been debunked on what has been falsely misrepresented — or mis — misrepresented here, so we have to call that out. Doocy had a simple follow-up to explain “what the misrepresentation is”, but Jean-Pierre refused to do so because the 13,000 number “is been falsely represented here” and “[i]f you look at the total returns and removal of the past year, that has been higher than every year under the previous administration since — since — uh — 2010[.]” Moving on from whatever that meant, Doocy asked about Helene, noting North Carolinians “were drowning in their houses” while “Biden was at his beach house and Vice President Harris was hosting political fundraisers on the west coast.” Jean-Pierre’s long, winding gobbledegook could be boiled down to they made phone calls and the people who are actual experts in disaster response were on the job (click “expand”): The President did exactly what a President in this moment needs to do, which is directing his team to take action. One of the reasons that the FEMA administrator was here in this room on Thursday is the President wanted to make sure that we were sending a message out to folks who are going to be impacted by the hurricane and also wanted her to share how we were prepositioning on the ground. Remember, these are folks who do this type of stuff. We think about FEMA, you think about the Red Cross. You think about the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. This is what they do. This is what they do. And so, the President was on the phone. He said this when he was asked a question by one of your colleagues for more than two hours yesterday with governors and local elected officials making sure that they have what they needed. You heard me talk about Governor Kemp and what he said to the President himself. He said this and shared this in a press conference that the President has provided and said, what else do you need and he actually said to the President, we have what we need. So — and that’s, as you know, a Republican governor, and look, and I talked about how the Vice President also did her calls. She’s going to be going to the FEMA — FEMA agency and — in the center — the center to — to get her briefing later this afternoon. The President is continuing — continuing to have these conversations with folks on the ground — elected officials on the ground to make sure that they have what they need and directing his team to keep pushing. Doocy moved on, but not before a final topic on the dock workers strike: “[H]ow worried your folks at the White House that a port strike that could make things like fruits and vegetables more expensive, could make it a lot harder for Vice President Harris to win the election?” Of course, Jean-Pierre punted by citing the election and stating in part what the administration does believe is ensuring “workers are — are paid and wages and the economy is working — uh — and that we’re lowering costs for the American people[.]” ABC’s Selina Wang followed and lobbed this ridiculous question smearing former President Trump for going to a part of Georgia hit hard by the hurricane: “Former President Donald Trump is in Georgia in a region that’s been hard hit. Now given all the security that’s needed to accommodate him, is his visit putting a strain on resources there or impacting relief efforts?” – ABC’s @selinawangtv at WH briefing pic.twitter.com/8YbpRUrqzo — Brent Baker ?? ?? (@BrentHBaker) September 30, 2024 To see the relevant transcript from the September 30 briefing, click “expand.” White House press briefing [via ABC News Live subfeed] September 30, 2024 3:16 p.m. Eastern PETER DOOCY: 13,000 people who have been convicted of murder crossed the border illegally and are living among us. So how much danger are you U.S. communities in right now — KARINE JEAN-PIERRE: So — DOOCY: — because of this? JEAN-PIERRE: — I’m assuming you’re talking about the ICE data? DOOCY: Yes. JEAN-PIERRE: Uh — so, just a couple of things and I think it’s important to — to correct the record here. Uh — first of all, the false — there — the false representation of the data — uh — I shared, so that was what we are seeing — false representation. I got to call that out. We got to call that out and it’s been fact checked by some of your colleagues here by multiple — multiple — uh — multiple — um — outlets that has been debunked on what has been falsely misrepresented — or mis — misrepresented here, so we have to call that out. Um — and so, look, this is —  DOOCY: Can you clarify what the misrepresentation is? JEAN-PIERRE: — the numbers that is being put out about how many people are out — is been falsely represented here. If you look at the total returns and removal of the past year, that has been higher than every year under the previous administration since — since — uh — 2010, if you look at it and — if we’re going to report something, a — data that’s out there, we got to do it in a way that is not — not confusing the American people and certainly not lying. And so, there has been — this has been fact checked — been fact checked — uh — and so this is the way that is being false falsely represented here is just not okay and — though — got to be really clear about that.  DOOCY: On Helene, people in west — western North Carolina were drowning in their houses this weekend. Others were losing everything. President Biden was at his beach house and Vice President Harris was hosting political fundraisers on the west coast. Is there a reason that they could not be here? JEAN-PIERRE: The President did exactly what a President in this moment needs to do, which is directing his team to take action. One of the reasons that the FEMA administrator was here in this room on Thursday is the President wanted to make sure that we were sending a message out to folks who are going to be impacted by the hurricane and also wanted her to share how we were prepositioning on the ground. Remember, these are folks who do this type of stuff. We think about FEMA, you think about the Red Cross. You think about the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. This is what they do. This is what they do. And so, the President was on the phone. He said this when he was asked a question by one of your colleagues for more than two hours yesterday with governors and local elected officials making sure that they have what they needed. You heard me talk about Governor Kemp and what he said to the President himself. He said this and shared this in a press conference that the President has provided and said, what else do you need and he actually said to the President, we have what we need. So — and that’s, as you know, a Republican governor, and look, and I talked about how the Vice President also did her calls. She’s going to be going to the FEMA — FEMA agency and — in the center — the center to — to get her briefing later this afternoon. The President is continuing — continuing to have these conversations with folks on the ground — elected officials on the ground to make sure that they have what they need and directing his team to keep pushing. DOOCY: And one more, how worried your folks at the White House that a port strike that could make things like fruits and vegetables more expensive, could make it a lot harder for Vice President Harris to win the election? JEAN-PIERRE: I’m not going to talk about an election from here. That’s not what we’re going to do. That is ---- when it comes to making sure that workers are — are paid and wages and the economy is working — uh — and that we’re lowering costs for the American people, that is just the right thing to do, and that’s what this President focuses on. Every day, day in and day out, how do we have an economy that works for all? When it comes to this particular question that you’re asking me, we’ve said this many times and nothing has changed, we support collective bartering [sic]. It is the best way for American workers and employers to come to a fair agreement. We encourage all parties to come to the bargaining table and negotiate in good faith. A — senior officials from the White House, Labor Department, and Transportation Department are in touch with the parties to urge them to return to the table and negotiate in good faith towards the — an  agreement that benefits all sides and do it fairly and quickly, and this is something that we have said and we’re going to continue to push forward on. DOOCY: Is the Vice President involved in these negotiations? JEAN-PIERRE: What I can say is — I just named the secretaries that are involved, Secretary Pete Buttigieg, Secretary Julie Sue. and the director of National Economic Council Lael Brainard. What I can say is the president and the vice president are being regularly updated about the situation, and — um — I know there’s a question about the Taft Hartley. We — we never — uh — we have never invoked the Taft Hartley to break a strike and are not considering doing so now, but this is a President that has been called a pro-union president by labor — by the labor unions because of how much he believes that the union built the middle class and so, that’s what you’re going to continue to see from this President. He’ll say regularly updated. DOOCY: Thanks. JEAN-PIERRE: Go ahead, Selina. SELINA WANG: Former President Donald Trump is in Georgia in a region that’s been hard hit. Now, given all the security that’s needed to accommodate him, is his visit putting a strain on resources there or impacting relief efforts? JEAN-PIERRE: Here’s what I can say, and you’ve heard this from this President earlier today in his remarks where he said he will visit impacted communities this week and is taking caution — he is taking caution to avoid using critical resources that is needed right now on the road that — on the ground that people need and so, that should be everyone’s top consideration right now. That’s what we should be doing. That’s what we should be focusing, and I’ll leave it there. WANG: So, were there any requests for Trump to delay his visit? JEAN-PIERRE: I’m not getting into it anymore than what I just stated. The President has been really clear about how he sees his presence on the ground. As you know, when the President traveled, it’s a big footprint in this particular moment, he wants to make sure that he’s not taking away resource — resources. He wants to make sure that It is not taking away from the emergency — uh — resources that are on the ground and as I just stated, he believes everybody should adhere — adhere to that.

Big finance is giving off some interesting signals as the 2024 election draws closer, including JPMorgan Chase’s longtime CEO Jamie Dimon, when he sang the praises of former President Donald Trump on CNBC. “You have all these very powerful forces that are going to be affecting us in ‘24 and ‘25, so if I was the government, I would be preparing for what I’m going to do about that, assuming things aren’t good,” Dimon told the reporter. “I wish the Democrats would think a little more carefully when they talk about MAGA, you know, and if you travel this country,” Dimon continued, “I don’t think they’re voting for Trump because of his family values.” “If you take a step back, be honest, he was kind of right about NATO, kind of right about immigration. He grew the economy quite well, tax reform worked, he was right about some of China,” he said, adding, “He wasn’t wrong about some of these critical issues.” Jill Savage of “Blaze News Tonight” is curious as to whether or not Dimon’s sentiments reflect his colleagues. “Who would you say big finance is backing at this election?” Savage asks Ten31 managing partner Marty Bent. “I think it’s pretty clear it's got to be Donald Trump,” Bent tells Savage and Matthew Peterson. “If you’re looking for some certainty in terms of economic policy in the next administration, like you mentioned, it doesn’t seem like Kamala has a policy at all.” Peterson points out that there’s one issue with this prediction. “We have a little problem in the last couple decades, which is that big finance, and big money in general, is not allowed to say that they support anyone other than sort of the Borg, and that’s the Democrats now,” Peterson says. “So it’s an interesting predicament,” he adds. Want more from 'Blaze News Tonight'?To enjoy more provocative opinions, expert analysis, and breaking stories you won’t see anywhere else, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Californians looking to cast a ballot in the next several weeks likely won't have to present proof of identification thanks to a new bill signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D).On Thursday, Newsom signed SB 1174, which bars all local governments in California from "requiring a person to present identification for the purpose of voting or submitting a ballot."'Unnecessary obstacles to voter participation disproportionately burdens low-income voters, voters of color, young or elderly voters, and people with disabilities.'State Sen. Dave Min (D-Irvine) introduced the bill earlier this year after residents in Huntington Beach voted to approve a local ordinance requiring voters to show ID to cast a ballot in municipal elections.Folks in Huntington Beach previously ran afoul of state Democrats for fighting back against lockdown measures in 2020 and voting to outlaw the Pride flag on municipal buildings.In April, California Attorney General Rob Bonta and Secretary of State Shirley Weber sued the city, claiming the local ordinance requiring ID to vote violated state law."State election law already contains robust voter ID requirements with strong protections to prevent voter fraud while ensuring that every eligible voter can cast their ballot without hardship. Imposing unnecessary obstacles to voter participation disproportionately burdens low-income voters, voters of color, young or elderly voters, and people with disabilities," Bonta previously said in a statement."We cannot have 100 different charter cities making up 100 different sets of voting rules based on fringe conspiracy theories," added Min.Huntington Beach officials have yet to respond to the lawsuit.Meanwhile, SB 1174 will go into effect, though exactly when is unclear. Democracy Docket reported that the "new law is now in effect," though Newsweek reported that it won't go into effect until January 1.Sam, a likely AI-generated online assistant at the website for the California secretary of state, recommended that voters bring ID to their polling locations this year. Sam went on to explain to Blaze News that "in most cases, California voters are not required to show identification at their polling place." However, poll workers may request to see an ID in certain cases of incomplete voter registration, Sam said.Blaze News then called the secretary of state's voter hotline for further clarification about whether the law will be in effect in the November election. Unfortunately, the call was disconnected before we received an answer. Blaze News called back, only to be told to contact county-level officials.Elon Musk, a former California resident who moved some of his businesses to Texas in large part because of California's destructive policies, lambasted the new law."Wow, it is now illegal to require voter ID in California!" Musk posted to X. "They just made PREVENTING voter fraud against the law. The Joker is in charge."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Democratic Sen. Jon Tester of Montana faced his Republican challenger in a heated debate on Tuesday, but it is a closing line that is getting a lot of attention on social media. 'Tester got his head dunked in a DC toilet.' The wide-ranging debate touched on many topics, but Tim Sheehy lobbed a haymaker at Tester when the Democrat tried to accuse the Republican of supporting privatization of public lands in Montana. "Well, Senator Tester knows all about backroom meetings. He's been taking them for 20 years as the number one recipient of lobbyist cash. The number one recipient of lobbyist cash in the whole country! Of all candidates, number one!" Sheehy said. "So if you want to talk about backroom meetings, while I was fighting in Afghanistan, he was eating lobbyist steak in D.C.," he added.Sheehy went on to deny that he was trying to sell off public lands. Video of the moment went viral on social media where many commentators declared Tester's political career expired. "Tim Sheehy committed a homicide during the Montana Senate debate tonight," responded Greg Price. "The look on Tester’s face. He knows," replied Republican activist Matthew Hurtt. "This is called a smack down! Tester got his head dunked in a DC toilet," read another critical tweet. The RealClearPolitics average of polling in the race has Sheehy trouncing Tester with an average of 5.8% over the incumbent Democrat. In-person voting for Montana begins on Oct. 8.The entire debate can be viewed on Montana PBS on its YouTube account. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, a UN agency, released a statement on Monday criticizing the Biden-Harris administration's decision to extend its so-called asylum restrictions, which the agency claimed "severely curtails access to protection for people fleeing conflict, persecution, and violence, putting many refugees and asylum seekers in grave danger without a viable option for seeking safety."The agency expressed "profound concern," arguing that "every person seeking asylum must be granted access to safety and afforded the opportunity to have their claims individually and fairly assessed before deportation or removal."'We have not cut off our asylum system.'In June, President Joe Biden signed Proclamation 10773, 89 FR 48487 - Securing the Border, an executive order that claimed to give the federal government the authority to shut down the southern border when the number of immigrant encounters reached 2,500 per day for seven consecutive days. The restriction could be lifted if the average number fell to 1,500 per day for a week.However, it carved out numerous exceptions, including for unaccompanied minors; individuals from countries that do not take back deportees; and individuals experiencing medical emergencies, a "severe form" of trafficking, or those with a "credible fear." Additionally, the so-called shutdown does not impact foreign nationals who schedule an appointment to claim asylum at a port of entry through the Customs and Border Protection's CBP One app. The administration recently extended these actions and added that the average number of encounters must drop below 1,500 per day for 28 days before being lifted. Additionally, as part of the recent extension, the administration announced that it is now counting all children in that total. Previously, only children from Mexico were counted.Despite the administration's toothless restriction potentially impacting only foreign nationals who attempt to illegally cross the border between designated ports of entry, the UNHCR claims the rules are too strict and may even violate international law."Limiting or blocking such access is a violation of international refugee law and the humanitarian principles to which the United States has long been a leader," the agency's statement read."UNHCR remains committed to collaborating with the U.S. in support of much needed reforms to enhance the fairness, efficiency, and capacity of its asylum and border management systems," it continued. "The United States has a long history of offering refuge and it is crucial that it continues to uphold its legacy as a beacon of protection for those in need. That is why UNHCR continues to call on the U.S. to reconsider these measures and ensure that no person seeking protection is unjustly turned away or put at risk of harm."The American Immigration Lawyers Association similarly claimed that the administration's new rule is effectively an asylum ban, the Associated Press reported.Kelli Stump, the AILA's president, stated, "It is imperative that our nation have safe, orderly, and efficient processes at the border that also ensure fair and humane treatment of asylum seekers. The consequences of denying asylum to someone who is being persecuted can literally be a matter of life or death."Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas rejected those claims, pointing to the restriction's built-in exceptions, according to the AP."We have not cut off our asylum system," Mayorkas remarked.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Imagine waking up, grabbing your morning coffee, scrolling through your news feed, and seeing this headline: “U.S. Port Workers Begin Nationwide Strike.” It’s easy to dismiss it. Dockworkers and ports seem like distant concerns, right? On the contrary, this strike will hit you in the most personal way possible: your wallet, your daily life, and your family’s security. It’s not a question of if this strike will impact you — it’s a question of when and how much. In the first week, things will seem almost normal. You’ll still receive your online orders, stores will remain stocked, and most people will continue with their daily routines, oblivious to what’s happening behind the scenes. But even in that first week, the cracks in the system will start to form.Automation is already here. Like AI, it’s too late to stop it. The question now isn’t whether it will happen but how we will adapt.Retailers, manufacturers, and businesses that rely on steady shipments will begin to feel the pressure. Stockrooms will start to run thin as supply chains begin to wobble as they did during COVID. While it may seem like life is carrying on as usual, there’s an invisible strain building across the economy. By the second week, the changes will become obvious. You'll visit the grocery store and see emptier shelves. Fresh fruits like bananas, avocados, and berries, typically available year-round, will become scarce. This shortage won't stop at food. Electronics, clothing, and children's toys may also start disappearing from the shelves. Businesses will scramble for limited inventory, pushing prices higher as competition intensifies.By the third week, minor inconveniences will give way to a full-blown crisis. Entire industries that depend on overseas parts and materials will slow down or shut down completely. Factories will furlough workers as the supply chain dries up. Grocery stores will start rationing items, limiting how much you can purchase as shortages spread. Inflation will rear its ugly head, driving up prices on food, clothing, and gas. Even if the strike ends in week three, the damage will already be done, and clearing the port backlog will take weeks, if not months.By the fourth week, the strike will escalate from an economic issue to a national security problem. We are entering what I call a “polycrisis” — a perfect storm of interconnected challenges poised to deliver a knockout blow to the nation. Inflation is already spiraling out of control, a devastating hurricane has disrupted supply chains, and now a crippling port strike adds to the turmoil.These crises will combine, creating a cascading effect that could overwhelm the country. Small businesses will close their doors, grocery store shelves will become sparse, and your favorite brands may vanish entirely. Industries will collapse as jobs disappear, and inflation will erode the purchasing power of everyday Americans. The economic impact won't stop at inflation or supply chain disruptions — companies will eliminate jobs as they shift operations to reduce reliance on U.S. ports in the future.Why would dockworkers risk such a crisis? At the heart of this dispute are their demands for higher wages and ironclad guarantees that their jobs won’t be replaced by automation. Their specific demand regarding wages is a 77% pay raise over six years after already turning down a 50% increase. As tough as dock work is, the pay is already well above the national average — $100,000 to $200,000 a year. Meanwhile, the rest of America is barely keeping up with inflation.But the bigger issue is their demand to halt automation. The union is pushing back hard against the tech-driven future that corporations are pursuing. They demand guarantees to prevent machines from completely phasing out human workers. They are calling for limits on automation to ensure that human jobs remain at the ports in the future. Without these guarantees, workers fear being reduced to a skeleton crew that merely oversees machines taking over their roles. Once that happens, they believe it's only a matter of time before even those remaining jobs disappear entirely.I can sympathize with the dock workers. No one wants to hear, “We have a machine that can do your job faster and without breaks. Good luck.”But here’s the cold reality: Automation is already here. Like AI, it’s too late to stop it. The question now isn’t whether it will happen but how we will adapt. China has already embraced automation, making its ports more efficient, cheaper, and safer. If we fail to adapt, we will fall behind, and in the long run, that poses a much bigger threat to American workers than the immediate concerns of this strike. Instead of pushing people out, we need to focus on retraining and retooling the workforce to meet the demands of this new era.This strike will ripple through the entire economy, leading to job losses, higher prices, and a weakened global standing. The longer it drags on, the more permanent the damage will be, and without leadership to address these challenges, we’ll be left scrambling to pick up the pieces.Want more from Glenn Beck? Get Glenn's FREE email newsletter with his latest insights, top stories, show prep, and more delivered to your inbox.

Several Springfield, Ohio, residents recently told Blaze News' Julio Rosas that their concerns about the impacts of the immigration crisis on their community are not being addressed.Rosas attended Springfield's commission meeting on September 24, speaking with locals ahead of the scheduled discussion. Many expressed frustrations over the lack of solutions and contended that their concerns seemed to be passed over.'If we're going to welcome them into our community, why are we going to exploit them that way?'One resident told Rosas before the meeting, "We're not getting any solutions right now. And it's up to our leaders — all of them, even the county commissions need to come in on this because it affects the whole county.""We need to sit down together and come up with a list of the problems and come up with solutions," he stated.In particular, locals have stated that the influx of 20,000 Haitian nationals into the Springfield metropolitan area has led to an increase in traffic accidents, spiked rental costs, and a housing shortage. Several residents told Blaze News that women have reported being followed around retail stores by Haitian men."We have not gotten anywhere at these council meetings," the local continued to tell Rosas. "Can we get some support on training these people on how to drive? There needs to be some training. When you come here, you don't stalk women in the stores and scare our women. It's not going to go good for them. And to me, it's not even so much a culture thing, that's more of common sense. You don't just follow women around in a store. Our women are scared to go to the store."He claimed that the Haitian nationals in the city should also have some grievances they would like to see addressed."They're being trafficked for labor and who knows what else," he told Rosas. "And the way they're being taken advantage of. They're paying three times as much for rent as what they should be.""Why is that?" he questioned. "If we're going to welcome them into our community, why are we going to exploit them that way? Why are we going to let them be exploited that way?"Richard Jordan, another resident, speculated that some local leaders may be benefiting from the immigration crisis and, therefore, are not eager to address the community's concerns."The money's going somewhere. There's a reason these people are being coddled," he said, referring to the Haitians. "And the American citizens are being put as second class. And it's bulls***."When asked whether he was concerned about potential backlash, he told Rosas, "We've already seen the backlash. People are calling us liars because we're expressing our voice, which everybody should."Residents confronted their city leaders in the commission meeting, demanding answers and swift solutions. One local shouted out during the meeting, "This is the swamp right here. We need to drain it on a local level."Diana Daniels, a Springfield resident, told city leaders, "Every time a citizen got up here and had a concern … [they receive] pushback. 'That's racist; that's xenophobic.' When, in fact, you weren't listening to what was said underneath.""The city commission and someone decided that race needed to be the issue," Daniels added.Jordan addressed city leaders during the meeting, stating, "I'm getting tired of people portraying white people as being racist.""There's a bunch of scandalous things going on in our town," Jordan said.Mark Sanders, a resident who previously spoke with Rosas, laid the blame for the city's issues at the commission's feet."Everything that's happened in this city in the last two weeks [is] your fault," Sanders said, pointing toward commission members. "In March of this year, I brought to the commission about domestic animal abuse. Gave you where to look. Nobody looked. Nobody." Springfield was thrust into the national spotlight after allegations Haitians were stealing geese and ducks from parks and residents' dogs and cats. "I've been harping since September of last year about towing vehicles driven by unlicensed drivers. It's still happening today," he said, referring to claims that Springfield Police Division is not towing vehicles of unlicensed drivers.After the public comment period concluded, city commissioners responded to some of the questions and concerns raised by residents. Mayor Rob Rue (R) said, "I just need to say, I had no foreknowledge of immigrants coming into our community and making a decision to allow or disallow. Folks that are here are here. And I have said this multiple times publicly: It is our job to make sure this community's secure and that we wrap our arms around this situation. It is a human thing to do, period. I don't like to see a broad brush of hate swathed against any human group, and I don't like seeing what we're seeing in the last couple weeks.""As good city leaders, we are subject to the federal administration policy that we are dealing with ... which means we're going to deal with it, and that's the best we can do," he stated. "It is, again, a misunderstanding or absolutely not true that I would be accused not to care about the things that we're hearing from both of these podiums and microphones."After several unanswered calls to the Springfield Police Division, the department told Blaze News in an emailed statement, "Thanks for your interest. I will see what we can get to you, but your deadline is tight and we do not have capacity right now with all the media requests we are getting. We will get back to you as soon as practical."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Distributive Justice? Receipt-filled Thread Details MESS Biden/Harris Has Made of FEMA in the Name of DEI