YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #jesuschrist #christmas #christ #merrychristmas #princeofpeace #achildisborn #noël #christmas2025
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
1 y

NO EVIDENCE! PBS Host Geoff Bennett Rips Talk of Democrat Rhetoric Endangering Trump
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

NO EVIDENCE! PBS Host Geoff Bennett Rips Talk of Democrat Rhetoric Endangering Trump

Donald Trump returning to Butler, Pennsylvania on Saturday clearly upset PBS News Hour anchor Geoff Bennett on Monday, especially when multiple speakers argued harsh Democrat rhetoric about Trump -- he's Hitler, a threat to Democracy -- inspired assassins. Bennett didn't object when Jim Acosta and other journalists said Trump's criticism of the "Fake News" media would get them killed. In the weekly political panel with Amy Walter and NPR's Tamara Keith, Bennett explained: "Donald Trump returned to Butler, Pennsylvania, the site of the first assassination attempt. And he and some members of his family suggested that Democrats are somehow behind these attempts on his life." Then he played video of Donald Trump, J.D. Vance, and most passionately Eric Trump blaming the Democrats for inflaming the shooters.   He huffed to Walter: "So claims without regard for evidence or propriety. I mean, what are your — what are your takeaways?" Walter gave a conventional answer about how the shooting in Butler didn't moderate Trump's tone. Neither of them would mention that the second assassination attempt came from a guy who called Trump a "threat to democracy," just like the Democrats do.  From there, Bennett turned to Keith and said "there's one last topic I want to get to. It's The New York Times putting a focus on Donald Trump's age and mental cognition. Our friend Peter Baker and his colleagues over there write that: "Donald Trump's speeches have grown darker, harsher, longer, angrier, less focused, more profane, and increasingly fixated on the past." There is this question of, where's the outrage and the criticism that Joe Biden saw when the question was focused on his age and mental capacity? Keith said the age issue is now "fair game," since Biden was forced out. "He is now the oldest candidate in the race, and he has never released a fulsome health report. He has said he's aced his cognitive exams, but he hasn't ever released non-superlative medical reports." Earlier, Bennett introduced a clip of Kamala Harris doing the "Call Her Daddy" sex podcast (and he bungled the title), but he had to drag in objectionable Republicans:  BENNETT: She was asked about Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders' criticism that somehow Kamala Harris didn't have anyone to keep her humble because she doesn't have biological children. Here's how she responded. HARRIS: I don't think she understands that there are a whole lot of women out here who, one, are not aspiring to be humble. [SCREEN WIPE] Family comes in many forms, and I think that increasingly all of us understand that this is not the 1950s anymore. Bennett then asked Keith to explain Kamala's interview strategy, which you could ask Team Kamala (if Keith isn't unofficially on it).  PBS felt they had to edit out Kamala rambling about women having love in their life and family in their life and children in their life....PBS just seems to line up their beefs with unfair Republican snark against Democrats.  Earlier this year, Clay Waters reported that PBS News Hour completely miscontrued Trump's remarks about an economic "bloodbath" if Biden was reelected. That was dangerously violent rhetoric. How perfectly partisan. 
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
1 y

PolitiFact Founder Claims Lying Has 'Become a Culture' For GOP
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

PolitiFact Founder Claims Lying Has 'Become a Culture' For GOP

If journalism professor and PolitiFact founder Bill Adair meant to increase faith in the fact-checking industry with his appearance on Comedy Central’s The Daily Show, he failed miserably. Adair told host Jon Stewart on Monday that the reason why Republicans get fact-checked more is because “lying... has just become a culture” in conservative circles. Holding up a copy of Adair’s book, Stewart declared, “You’ve taken criticism because you fact-check more people on the right, or you say they lie more... I mean, it’s in here; there’s a statistical analysis.”     Adair replied, “What I did for the book was look at fact-checks by PolitiFact and by the Washington Post fact-checker and then talk to -- I think the most revealing thing was when I talked to Republican politicians and said, ‘Why does your party lie more?’ And it was really revealing.” Stewart then interrupted because he found the premise to be humorous, “Wait, you just said, ‘Why do you guys lie more?’ And they’re like, ‘Good question, Bill. There’s something deeply wrong with us.’” Adair was then forced to admit he didn’t really talk to Republicans, “Yeah, well, these are, for the most part, people who have left the Republican Party and who will acknowledge this truth, but, you know, they have a partisan media that not only looks the other way when they lie, but echoes their lies, and often has a business model built upon their lies, and so, you begin with that. Then, you have a culture in the Republican Party that many people told me goes back to—many people put it with Newt Gingrich as sort of the turning point.” According to Adair, Gingrich “changed the culture of the Republican Party and changed it into sort of an anything goes. ‘Hey, if we’re going to win, let's, you know, you can change the facts.’” Stewart suggested that it was more likely caused by Richard Nixon and Roger Ailes, and Adair didn’t disagree, “And, you know, combine all those things, and you have a recipe for lying and support for lying that has just become a culture.” That’s a funny thing to say after the VP debate where PolitiFact hacked up a JD Vance quote to rate him mostly false when the rest of his quote said what PolitiFact’s rebuttal claimed he omitted while refusing to give Tim Walz a false rating for his Tiananmen Square tall tale. Earlier in the interview, Adair claimed, “The whole idea is to answer people's curiosity... If you hear a politician make a statement, and you wonder, ‘Is that true?’ Those are the things that PolitiFact checks. I mean, and ultimately, that's what journalism is all about. To answer people's curiosity. If they are wondering what is true and what's not, that is what PolitiFact fact-checks.”     Really? Are people really wondering if Donald Trump is dead? Still, Adair later chimed in on the fact-checkers relationship with big tech companies, “I think humans will be needed to create fact-checks. We hear what is wrong, we need to research it. We need to respond to it. But yes, AI can be used to spread it more efficiently, to broader audiences.” He hyped, “Two things we have done with our team at Duke is to, we work with a tech company to create a standard so that fact-checkers could label their fact checks. It's called ‘claim review,’ and it allows them, when they publish something, to put this tag on so that tech companies, search engines, social media platforms can find—“ Stewart interrupted to clarify, “Like a good housekeeping seal, to some extent of—” to which Adair argued, “it is really like a street sign that says, 'This is a fact-check on person, on this claim.' And claim review helps find that fact-check, if you're Google, so, Google can then say, “Oh, here's a fact-check” and could use it in powerful ways. So, that's one way.” Seeing possibilities, Stewart hoped, “And keeps the information from being, let's say, laundered throughout the internet, which is often times what happens. People lose attribution.” Adair hedged, “Potentially. I can't speak for Google, but that is something they could do.” But what is a Googler to do when they see a fact-check label that itself isn’t true? Here is a transcript for the October 7 show: COMEDY CENTRAL The Daily Show 10/7/2024 11:20 PM ET JON STEWART: And the idea is, it's sort of a repository of fact-checkers for political speech. How did you decide what would be included in what you would decide to check? BILL ADAIR: Sure. So, the whole idea is to answer people's curiosity.  STEWART: Right. ADAIR: If you hear a politician make a statement, and you wonder, "Is that true?" Those are the things that PolitiFact checks. I mean, and ultimately, that's what journalism is all about. To answer people's curiosity. If they are wondering what is true and what's not, that is what PolitiFact fact-checks. … 11:24 PM ET   ADAIR: I think humans will be needed to create fact-checks. We hear what is wrong, we need to research it. STEWART: Right. ADAIR: We need to respond to it. But yes, AI can be used to spread it more efficiently, to broader audiences. STEWART: And to be more responsive. ADAIR: So, two ways that we've done that at Duke. We worked – STEWART: Duke? ADAIR: Duke University? STEWART: I have heard it's a safety school. I have heard very, very poor things. ADAIR: [Laughs] So, two things we have done with our team at Duke is to, we work with a tech company to create a standard so that fact-checkers could label their fact checks. It's called “claim review,” and it allows them, when they publish something, to put this tag on so that tech companies, search engines, social media platforms can find – STEWART: Like a good housekeeping seal, to some extent of— ADAIR: It is really like a street sign that says, "This is a fact-check on person, on this claim." And claim review helps find that fact-check, if you're Google— STEWART: I see. ADAIR: So, Google can then say, “Oh, here's a fact-check” and could use it in powerful ways. So, that's one way. STEWART: And keeps the information from being, let's say, laundered throughout the internet, which is often times what happens. People lose attribution. ADAIR: Potentially. I can't speak for Google, but that is something they could do. … 11:35 PM ET STEWART: You’ve taken criticism because you fact-check more people on the right, or you say they lie more. ADAIR: Yes. STEWART: And better. ADAIR: Right. They're very good at it. STEWART: Yes, but you’ve done it, I mean, it’s in here; there’s a statistical analysis. ADAIR: Yes. What I did for the book was look at fact-checks by PolitiFact and by the Washington Post fact-checker and then talk to — I think the most revealing thing was when I talked to Republican politicians and said, “Why does your party lie more?” And it was really revealing. STEWART: Wait, you just said, “Why do you guys lie more?” And they’re like, “Good question, Bill. There’s something deeply wrong with us.” ADAIR: Yeah, well, these are, for the most part, people who have left the Republican Party and who will acknowledge this truth, but, you know, they have a partisan media that not only looks the other way when they lie, but echoes their lies, and often has a business model built upon their lies, and so, you begin with that. Then, you have a culture in the Republican Party that many people told me goes back to — many people put it with Newt Gingrich as sort of the turning point. STEWART: Really? ADAIR: That Newt Gingrich, sort of, changed the culture of the Republican Party and changed it into sort of an anything goes. “Hey, if we’re going to win, let's, you know, you can change the facts.” STEWART: By any means necessary. ADAIR: Yes.  STEWART: Right. ADAIR: And that culture took hold. Now, some people dated earlier. STEWART: I’d go to Nixon on that and Roger Ailes. ADAIR: I was just going say, and Roger Ailes. STEWART: And maybe money isn't even the point. Roger Ailes, the founder of Fox News, very famously said during Watergate, “I’m going to create an apparatus so that what the left did to Nixon,” they viewed any sort of press as the left, what they did to Nixon, “you can never again do to another Republican candidate or president,” and quite frankly, I think has been successful. ADAIR: And, you know, combine all those things — STEWART: Yeah. ADAIR: — and you have a recipe for lying and support for lying that has just become a culture.
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
1 y

POR FIN: Fox News lanza ‘Fox Noticias’ en español
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

POR FIN: Fox News lanza ‘Fox Noticias’ en español

Por fin, después de décadas de llamados para lanzar contenido en español, finalmente está sucediendo: Fox News está lanzando programación de noticias original en español, además de una versión en español de su sitio web. Según Axios: Fox News Media lanzará un noticiero diario en  español programa de noticias llamado "Fox Noticias" que se transmitirá por Fox Deportes, la red de cable deportivo en español de Fox Corp., dijeron ejecutivos a Axios. Antes del debut la próxima semana, Fox News también presentará una versión en español de su sitio web. Por qué es importante: el 50% del aumento de nuevos votantes elegibles en los últimos cuatro años ha sido hispano, lo que representa uno de los bloques de votantes de más rápido crecimiento en el país, por Pew Research. Pero los medios tradicionales de televisión y periódicos que atienden a ese grupo han experimentado disminuciones (en audiencia). Que conste: los canales de televisión tradicionales que experimentan caídas son Univisión y Telemundo. Ha sido así durante décadas. ¿Y hacia dónde, te preguntarás, van esas audiencias? Según el comunicado de prensa de Fox News que anuncia el lanzamiento: FOX News se ubica como el principal destino de noticias por cable entre los televidentes hispanos con la audiencia más diversa políticamente en noticias por cable, según Nielsen Media Research. En particular, FOX News fue la cadena de cable número uno con espectadores hispanos en un total de 24 horas del día, así como durante el horario de máxima audiencia, durante el tercer trimestre de 2024. En general, la cadena ofrece el 36% de la participación total de visualización de noticias por cable hispanas y el 45% del grupo demográfico de 25 a 54 años. La cadena también mostró el mayor crecimiento en audiencia hispana durante el trimestre más reciente, un aumento del 65% en el total de espectadores diurnos y del 114 % en el segmento demográfico.   Al hacer el anuncio, Sylvester dijo: “Como proveedor líder de noticias por cable entre los televidentes hispanos con una de las audiencias más diversas en noticias por cable, estamos orgullosos de ofrecer nuevo contenido basado en titulares que se centra en los problemas que afectan a la comunidad hispana”. Siendo los números los que son, parecía una obviedad para Fox lanzar Noticias. En lugar de adoptar un enfoque de “constrúyelo y ellos vendrán”, Fox analizó datos históricos y determinó “Por cuanto ellos vinieron, nosotros lo construiremos”.  El lanzamiento es modesto y escalable, comenzando con una versión en español del sitio web de Fox News y un noticiero vespertino, presentado por la copresentadora de Fox & Friends Weekend, Rachel Campos-Duffy, que se transmitirá por Fox Deportes y en todas las propiedades digitales de la cadena, así como en sus redes sociales. Fox Noticias es la primera incursión completa de la cadena en la programación en español. ¿Y donde queda MundoFox, podrías preguntarte? Eso no cuenta. MundoFox, una empresa conjunta entre NewsCorp y la RCN de Colombia, se posicionó como una cadena de transmisión completa con entretenimiento, telenovelas y un noticiero que era indistinguible de lo que se podía ver en Univisión o Telemundo, y rápidamente se desvaneció. Como el Joker de Joaquin Phoenix, MundoFox es absolutamente no canónico. Si tuvieras una moneda por cada vez que terminé uno de mis artículos de MRC Latino con “el mercado clama por una alternativa”, tendrías muchas monedas. Después de años de pedirle a Fox News que entrara al mercado en español, finalmente lo hicieron. Es de esperarse que la izquierda, que se siente con derecho a controlar el flujo de información en español, caiga en brote.  
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
1 y

Slavoj Žižek Decries Creation of Israeli State As 'Original Sin' in Oct. 7 Screed for Soros Outlet
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

Slavoj Žižek Decries Creation of Israeli State As 'Original Sin' in Oct. 7 Screed for Soros Outlet

On the first anniversary of the horrific Hamas Oct. 7 terror attack against Israel in 2023, a prominent leftist philosopher decried the creation of the Israeli state in a George Soros-funded outlet. In an op-ed published in the Soros-funded publication Project Syndicate, Slavoj Žižek, a Slovenian Marxist philosopher and director at the University of London’s Birkbeck Institute, insinuated the destruction of the Israeli state would result in peace in the Middle East.  Žižek had the temerity to invoke biblical language by bafflingly referring to the Israeli state as Europe’s “original sin” following World War II that sparked much of the conflict around that region seen today and as a “symbol of European oppression and colonialization.” An estimated $2,914,890 was funneled into Project Syndicate by Soros, who has a sordid history of peddling anti-Israel sentiments and financing anti-Semitic groups that celebrated the Oct. 7 massacre. In a resurfaced op-ed from early 2007, Soros demanded America and Israel “open the door to Hamas.”  Žižek, in effect, fits himself right in with the Soros brand.  Žižek buried his true intent at the bottom of a hill of ludicrous equivalencies between the Israel-Palestinian conflict and the Russia-Ukraine war. In Žižek’s view, Israel is not that dissimilar from Russia, and Ukraine has parallels with “Palestine.” “If Russia occupies part of Ukraine and proclaims it part of Russia, can it then claim self-defense when it crushes those who resist,” he absurdly stated in comparison to Israel. FLASHBACK: Answers, Please! Why Did George Soros Fund a Radical Pro-Hamas Group? The Holy Land, long dominated and conquered by numerous empires over the centuries, is known to be the ancient land of the Jewish people. This fact, however, seems to be lost on Žižek, who claimed the establishment and movement of Jewish people to Israel was the result of European guilt following the Holocaust post-World War II. As long as that “sin” is not atoned for, spewed Žižek, there won’t be peace in the Middle East.   “Europeans gave the survivors of that genocide land that other people had inhabited for centuries. It is that original sin which, unexpiated, is once again preventing peace and quiet in the Middle East.” Žižek wrote disturbingly. Dan Schneider, Vice President of Free Speech America blasted Žižek in a statement, saying, “Žižek is a shining example of how really smart people can also be really dumb. First, he is very deceptive about how he describes the creation of the modern state of Israel. Jews have been continuously living on that land for thousands of years, more than twice as long as Islam has even existed as a religion. Jews were ‘given’ nothing they didn’t already have a right to.” Schneider continued, “And the so-called ‘sin’ of which Žižek writes allowed for the creation of the only country in the Middle East that honors the rule of law, individual rights, and pluralism. Try being a Muslim of the wrong sect in Egypt, Jordan, Iran, or any other Islamic country. The two safest places on the planet for Muslims are the US and Israel. The Marxist dogma remains strong in Žižek to this day.”  ICYMI: MRC’s Bozell, Schneider Blast Soros Empire for Funding Radical Pro-Hamas GroupsConservatives are under attack. Contact ABC News (818) 460-7477, CBS News (212) 975-3247 and NBC News (212) 664-6192 and demand they report on Žižek’s outrageous anti-Israel comments.
Like
Comment
Share
Twitchy Feed
Twitchy Feed
1 y

YUP, He Hates Her! What Biden Did RIGHT As Kamala Appeared on The View is TOO GOOD (Or Bad, For Her)
Favicon 
twitchy.com

YUP, He Hates Her! What Biden Did RIGHT As Kamala Appeared on The View is TOO GOOD (Or Bad, For Her)

YUP, He Hates Her! What Biden Did RIGHT As Kamala Appeared on The View is TOO GOOD (Or Bad, For Her)
Like
Comment
Share
RedState Feed
RedState Feed
1 y

Donald Trump Rakes Kamala Harris Over the Coals After Disastrous '60 Minutes' Interview
Favicon 
redstate.com

Donald Trump Rakes Kamala Harris Over the Coals After Disastrous '60 Minutes' Interview

Donald Trump Rakes Kamala Harris Over the Coals After Disastrous '60 Minutes' Interview
Like
Comment
Share
RedState Feed
RedState Feed
1 y

CONFUSION: Dozens of Imams and Religious Leaders Encourage Muslims to Vote for and Against Kamala Harris
Favicon 
redstate.com

CONFUSION: Dozens of Imams and Religious Leaders Encourage Muslims to Vote for and Against Kamala Harris

CONFUSION: Dozens of Imams and Religious Leaders Encourage Muslims to Vote for and Against Kamala Harris
Like
Comment
Share
RedState Feed
RedState Feed
1 y

JD Vance: Why I Ignored Tim Walz During Debate
Favicon 
redstate.com

JD Vance: Why I Ignored Tim Walz During Debate

JD Vance: Why I Ignored Tim Walz During Debate
Like
Comment
Share
RedState Feed
RedState Feed
1 y

Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and the VACANCY Sign at the White House
Favicon 
redstate.com

Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and the VACANCY Sign at the White House

Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and the VACANCY Sign at the White House
Like
Comment
Share
Trending Tech
Trending Tech
1 y

5 features Apple is expected to add to the iPad mini 7
Favicon 
bgr.com

5 features Apple is expected to add to the iPad mini 7

Apple will likely introduce a new iPad mini in the coming weeks. Three years after Cupertino last revamped its smallest tablet, there are several features we expect Apple to add to the iPad mini 7, making it a solid option for buyers. Even though a redesign and new display technology are expected for 2026 or 2027, there are at least five other features we think Apple will add to the iPad mini 7. A18 chip: When Apple introduced the iPad mini 6, the company added the newest A15 Bionic chip, exclusively available for the iPhone 13. If Cupertino follows the trend, this new iPad will feature the A18 chip. With that, Apple will double the performance on this new iPad, while also improving memory bandwidth and power efficiency. Apple Intelligence: The only two iPad models that don't feature Apple Intelligence are the mini and the base-model options. Since the iPad mini is almost an iPad Air with a smaller display, we think Apple will add 8GB of RAM to this device so it can run Apple Intelligence features. Image source: Apple Inc. Apple Pencil Pro: Apple has made a mess out of its Apple Pencil offering. There are four different accessories that work with different iPads. If the company wants to make sense of this confusing lineup, it might add support for Apple Pencil Pro with this upcoming tablet, which would add support for squeeze gestures, haptic feedback, and Find My integration. Camera tweak: Now, the only iPad that doesn't offer a front-facing camera on the landscape edge is the iPad mini. This next iteration could make the switch. However, I wouldn't be surprised if Apple doesn't tweak this iPad's camera, as it's the most portable and easy to use in portrait orientation. Improved connectivity offerings: The new iPhone offers Wi-Fi 7 capabilities. However, BGR expects Apple to upgrade the iPad mini 7 with Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3, and perhaps an eSIM technology instead of a physical SIM tray. Wrap up The new iPad mini 7 will likely be announced at Apple's upcoming October event. Would these features be enough to make you upgrade to this tablet? BGR will let you know once we learn more about it. Don't Miss: Apple Pencil comparison: 1st-gen, 2nd-gen, USB-C, or Pro – which is best for your iPad? The post 5 features Apple is expected to add to the iPad mini 7 appeared first on BGR. Today's Top Deals Reolink Fall Prime Day: Autumn’s Best Deals on Home Security – Get up to 44% OFF ECOVACS Fall Prime Day blowout: Up to $350 off best-selling robot vacuums like the T30S Best Fire TV Stick deals for October Prime Day 2024 Today’s deals: $60 Insignia smart TV, $735 black Apple Watch Ultra 2, $120 Ninja food processor, more
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 58844 out of 104005
  • 58840
  • 58841
  • 58842
  • 58843
  • 58844
  • 58845
  • 58846
  • 58847
  • 58848
  • 58849
  • 58850
  • 58851
  • 58852
  • 58853
  • 58854
  • 58855
  • 58856
  • 58857
  • 58858
  • 58859
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund