YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #jesuschrist #christmas #christ #merrychristmas #princeofpeace #achildisborn #noël #christmas2025
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
1 y

PolitiFact Rates Vance 91 Percent False At VP Debate, Walz 29 Percent False
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

PolitiFact Rates Vance 91 Percent False At VP Debate, Walz 29 Percent False

After Tuesday’s vice presidential debate between Republican JD Vance and Democrat Tim Walz, PolitiFact was at it again, rating Vance false 91 percent of the time and Walz false 29 percent of the time. While defenders of professional fact-checking may say, “Aha, that proves Vance lies more,” there were problems with PolitiFact’s assessments of both candidates. The PolitiFact team assigned five false, five mostly-false, and one half-true rating to Vance, or ten on the wrong side of the truth-o-meter and one in the middle. By contrast, Walz received one false, one mostly false, two mostly true, and three true ratings. That is two in the red and five in the green. As for the fact-checks themselves, PolitiFact ran into some issues. For example, Vance claimed, “There's a Federal Reserve study … that really drills down on the connection between increased levels of migration, especially illegal immigration, and higher housing prices." Rating that most-false, PolitiFact wrote, “Experts agree that increased immigration leads to higher demand for limited housing, but it is not solely, or predominantly, responsible for higher housing prices. Instead, they point to the shortage of affordable housing as the main driver of higher housing costs.” The funny thing is, Vance would agree. Immediately after PolitiFact’s final quote mark, Vance added, “Now, of course, Margaret, that's not the entire driver of higher housing prices. It's also the regulatory regime of Kamala Harris. Look, we are a country of builders.” Another claim that got Vance the “false” label was, “As I read the Minnesota law that (Walz) signed into law … it says that a doctor who presides over an abortion where the baby survives, the doctor is under no obligation to provide lifesaving care to a baby who survives a botched late-term abortion." PolitiFact’s response begins with a non-sequitur about how rare late-term abortions are before citing a previous PolitiFact article, “When there are fetal anomalies that make it likely the fetus will die before or soon after birth, some parents decide to terminate the pregnancy by inducing childbirth so that they can hold their dying baby, Democratic Minnesota state Sen. Erin Maye Quade told PolitiFact in September.” In other words, Vance is correct, but PolitiFact claims the baby was going to die anyway, so life-saving care is not required. In its original article, PolitiFact wrote, “Experts said cases in which babies are born following an abortion attempt are rare.” It also cited Law Professor Laura Hermer, ‘“Post-viability abortions are very uncommon in Minnesota, as elsewhere, though they do occasionally occur. Abortions resulting in live births, while hypothetically possible, are vanishingly rare,’ Hermer said, citing data from the Minnesota Department of Health.” “Rare,” does not mean "never,” and the new law repealed reporting requirements for births related to failed abortions. Elsewhere, PolitiFact refused to give Walz any sort of false label for his Tiananmen Square tale where he claimed to be in China during the 1989 protests, accepting Walz’s line that he “misspoke” despite Walz's history of making things up on everything from his military experience, rank, political origin story, to his endorsements. Walz also claimed, “Trump ‘gave the tax cuts that predominantly went to the top class. What happened there was an $8 trillion increase in the national debt, the largest ever.’" PolitiFact rated this “mostly true” and spent its entire summary talking about who benefited most from the tax cuts, but it never mentioned the words “COVID” or “pandemic.” While Trump added $8.4 trillion to the debt, the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget said that $3.6 trillion came from COVID-related spending while $2.5 trillion came from the tax cuts. If one were to add those to Walz’s tally, instead of two out of seven being false, you would get four out of eight or 50 percent. Moving the two Vance claims to the true side, would result in a false rating of 72 percent. If you were to throw in claims PolitiFact didn’t check, such as Vance’s true claim the U.S. has built only one new nuclear facility in 40 years, or other false ones from Walz, such as blaming pro-lifers for Amber Thurmond’s death, the numbers would be even closer.
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
1 y

Buried the Lede! Kari Lake's Democrat Senate Opponent Ruben Gallego Skips Debate
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

Buried the Lede! Kari Lake's Democrat Senate Opponent Ruben Gallego Skips Debate

Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) failed to show up for a debate with his Republican opponent for the U.S. Senate, Kari Lake. It was hardly a hostile venue for a Democrat -- Arizona PBS.  This would seem like a big deal...unless you are writing cover for him at the Arizona Republic in Phoenix, the state's largest newspaper (owned by Gannett). The headline about the scheduled debate published on their azcentral.com website does not even mention the no-show by Gallego: "Kari Lake assails economic data, Ruben Gallego and media host in new interview." It wasn't until four paragraphs down that reporter Ronald J. Hansen quickly brought up and then discarded (with no further mention) that Gallego was a no-show.   Lake appeared on the show alone after Gallego, a five-term member of Congress, declined to join her for what would have been a debate. This has been a Democrat habit with Lake. Two years ago, Gov. Katie Hobbs refused to debate her on Arizona PBS, so Lake got her own interview. Then PBS granted Hobbs her own interview anyway, making sure she was unpunished for skipping out.  So despite the Gallego no-show at the debate, the rest of the article comes off as an extended attack ad against the one who actually did show up at the debate, Kari Lake. Here is the plethora the hits at the very start of the story. U.S. Senate candidate Kari Lake, in a tense, televised interview, challenged the integrity of government data, refused again to acknowledge her 2022 gubernatorial loss and cast her Democratic challenger Ruben Gallego as a nuisance employee years ago. Appearing on Arizona PBS’ "Horizon” Thursday, the Republican nominee and former newscaster took umbrage at host Ted Simons' questions in a 30-minute show that veered into personal exchanges. When Simons cited data pointing to a strong economy, Lake sarcastically told Simons, “You know what? I have a great idea for you. When you retire here, you should go work for Kamala Harris.” Despite the no-show by Gallego, Hansen still got a member of the Gallego campaign to debate Lake from a distance by quoting the campaign spokesperson: Hannah Goss, a Gallego campaign spokesperson, said Lake’s comments in the interview are an example of why she is unfit for office. “Kari Lake will do or say anything to get power, even if it means hurting Arizonans,” she said. “This election is a choice between a Marine combat veteran with a lifetime of service and a power-hungry liar who wants to ban abortion — and that’s exactly why Arizonans are going to elect Ruben Gallego in 32 days.” Um, Ronald. Wouldn't it have been better if Gallego spoke up for himself at the debate rather than you covering up for him by quoting his spokesperson and brushing quickly past the inconvenient fact that he was a debate no-show despite a friendly station host? It was almost as if Hansen was trying to memory-hole the Gallego no-show by smothering it in a toxic stew of Kari Lake hits.
Like
Comment
Share
National Review
National Review
1 y

Why Israel Must Fight
Favicon 
www.nationalreview.com

Why Israel Must Fight

The anniversary of October 7 is an important reminder.
Like
Comment
Share
National Review
National Review
1 y

The Travesty of the CBP One App
Favicon 
www.nationalreview.com

The Travesty of the CBP One App

J. D. Vance is right.
Like
Comment
Share
National Review
National Review
1 y

The Pro-Life Movement Needs Men
Favicon 
www.nationalreview.com

The Pro-Life Movement Needs Men

You don’t have to be a woman to know that pregnancy means a new life.
Like
Comment
Share
National Review
National Review
1 y

Anniversary of Evil
Favicon 
www.nationalreview.com

Anniversary of Evil

The history of the October 7 attack is still being written.
Like
Comment
Share
National Review
National Review
1 y

Don’t Praise the Fed for Cleaning Up Its Own Mess
Favicon 
www.nationalreview.com

Don’t Praise the Fed for Cleaning Up Its Own Mess

The problem is that the Fed has too much discretion.
Like
Comment
Share
National Review
National Review
1 y

The Women and Girls We’ll Never Forget
Favicon 
www.nationalreview.com

The Women and Girls We’ll Never Forget

As we grieve for the victims of October 7 and the hostages, we also honor the extraordinary courage of the survivors.
Like
Comment
Share
Twitchy Feed
Twitchy Feed
1 y

Monday Morning Meme Madness
Favicon 
twitchy.com

Monday Morning Meme Madness

Monday Morning Meme Madness
Like
Comment
Share
Trending Tech
Trending Tech
1 y

M4 MacBook Pro leaked hands-on video reveals several key upgrades
Favicon 
bgr.com

M4 MacBook Pro leaked hands-on video reveals several key upgrades

Apple should unveil the M4 MacBook Pro refresh sometime in the coming weeks. That's what all the rumors say. Well, Apple is about to update various Macs this fall, with the M4 chip being the biggest upgrade. Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, who mentioned the M4 Macs several times in the past few months, said over the weekend that Apple might launch the new Macs on November 1st. It's unclear whether Apple will hold a special event for the new Macs and iPad mini 7. The latter is also supposed to come out this fall. While we wait, I'll point your attention to a hands-on video that gives us an unboxing of the purported base M4 MacBook Pro model. The YouTuber seems to have gotten their hands on the M4 MacBook Pro that appeared in a leak a few days ago. Photos of the alleged M4 MacBook Pro box suggested that Apple would equip the base M4 MacBook Pro with 16GB of RAM, just as rumors had claimed. The unboxing video confirms the detail, offering a benchmark test for the alleged Mac. Continue reading... The post M4 MacBook Pro leaked hands-on video reveals several key upgrades appeared first on BGR. Today's Top Deals Today’s deals: $2.75 smart plugs, $79 Ninja air fryer, $6.49 Anker USB-C chargers, $219 Dreo ChefMaker, more Today’s deals: First AirPods 4 discount, $6 smart bulbs, $110 off Dyson V8, $6 MagSafe chargers, more Early Prime Day deals: Rare Nintendo Switch sale, $50 off Oura Ring, $105 Sony ANC headphones, more Best Fire TV Stick deals for October Prime Day 2024
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 58987 out of 103948
  • 58983
  • 58984
  • 58985
  • 58986
  • 58987
  • 58988
  • 58989
  • 58990
  • 58991
  • 58992
  • 58993
  • 58994
  • 58995
  • 58996
  • 58997
  • 58998
  • 58999
  • 59000
  • 59001
  • 59002
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund