It’s Never Too Late to Cut Taxes for Small Businesses

Fresh-squeezed juice can be a great start to your day. But cleaning your juicer may not be as fun. Check out our tips to make quick work of cleaning.

Even if you love every cheese in the known universe‚ they won't all be great for making nachos. Thankfully‚ an expert weighed in on which ones work well.

The gold market is currently characterized by unusual demand driven by foreign central banks‚ not individual investors. Peter recently appeared on Fox Business to discuss Bitcoin’s recent performance. In this segment‚ he takes on Natalie Brunell‚ host of the podcast Coin Stories‚ in a friendly debate on the merits of crypto and precious metals. When asked why gold is performing so well‚ Peter replies‚ “Gold’s probably going to close at a new record high close today. It’s only a few dollars off it now‚ above $2370. Gold is rising because the dollar‚ the euro‚ the yen‚ and fiat currencies are losing value. Inflation is real. It’s here to stay. It’s not going anywhere near the Fed’s 2% target. We’re headed in the wrong direction. We’ll probably be in double digits by next year‚ and eventually‚ the first digit isn’t going to be a one.” The gold market is currently characterized by unusual demand driven by foreign central banks‚ not individual investors: “Central banks are out in front of this. They’re the main buyers. A lot of Americans have been foolishly selling their gold to buy these Bitcoin ETFs. There’s nothing elegant about losing your money in Bitcoin. Bitcoin is not going up.”Survival Shield X-3 is BACK at the Infowars Store&;#33; Get 40% OFF on the next evolution in activated nascent iodine HERE When Brunell criticizes gold for being “analog” and falling behind Bitcoin‚ a “digital sound money‚” Peter points out gold’s historic track record as real money: “There’s nothing sound about Bitcoin. It’s losing the race right now&;#33; Take a look at your screen. Gold is up 25—26 dollars— and Bitcoin is getting clobbered. There is no flaw in gold. Gold worked great for 5000 years. The problem is the flaws with governments— the flaws with human beings— not with gold. But Bitcoin is really flawed because it doesn’t have any actual value. Gold is the most useful metal on the periodic table. That’s why it’s money&;#33;” Investing in Bitcoin is akin to betting on a horse race. You can make money‚ but it’s all luck: “Wall Street didn’t embrace it [Bitcoin]. They’re just trying to make a buck off it. These big Wall Street firms aren’t buying any Bitcoin with their own money. This is their customers’ money that are dumb enough to buy it. They’re just booking the bets. They’re operating the casino.” Learn Why The Globalists Are Killing Their Own Monetary System

As was the case with the Ukraine narrative leading up to Russia’s invasion‚ the American narrative regarding Taiwan points to China’s provocative actions around Taiwan while waving off the possibility that Washington’s weapons deliveries and military buildup in that part of the Indo-Pacific region would be perceived as provocative from Beijing’s viewpoint. Earlier this year‚ the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences nominated Island in Between in the Best Documentary Short Film category at the ninety-sixth Academy Awards. Although it didn’t end up taking home the Oscar‚ the documentary drew attention to the little-known Kinmen Island and its precarious position as an inflection point in the relationship between Taiwan‚ mainland China‚ and the continuing involvement of the United States. Taiwanese American director S. Leo Chiang narrates scenes of the tranquil lives of locals on the island juxtaposed against the dreaded possibility of war that looms larger there than in the rest of Taiwan as the shores of the mainland lay in visible distance. In the film‚ a massive concrete loudspeaker pointed across Xiamen Bay wafts the voice of classic Taiwanese pop singer Teresa Teng as she sweetly sings her hits and delivers political taunts to the nearest mainland city‚ proclaiming that “I just hope all of you on the mainland will enjoy the same democracy and freedom that we have.” Chiang noted in an interview that from there‚ you probably can see and hear things and feel things that you cannot from Taipei‚ or from the rest of the main Taiwan Island. A lot of them have the attitude [that] we’ve always been really friendly with the folks in China‚ and we support closer relationships [with China]. The nuance of the Taiwanese people in managing relations with China seems utterly lost on Americans‚ and it shows in Washington’s policy.Introducing Next Level Foundational Energy from Dr. Jones Naturals starting at 30% off&;#33; This cutting-edge dietary supplement is designed to elevate your energy levels and support your overall well-being. Green Berets Confirmed Stationed Just Miles from China’s Shores The main island of Kinmen is situated just six miles away from the mainland Chinese city of Xiamen‚ and some parts of the island group are just 2.5 miles away. While Taiwan and its key role in US-China tensions has been gaining attention‚ far fewer people have heard of Kinmen. That might be changing as the US raises its level of engagement‚ sending military advisers and US Army Special Forces‚ better known as the Green Berets‚ there. Just a couple weeks after Island in Between was nominated for an Oscar‚ it was announced that US military advisers had begun long-term deployments to the island to assist in the training at the Taiwanese military’s amphibious camps to enhance their capabilities in countering enemy incursions. The deployments were planned along with various other types of support for Taiwan’s military under the 2023 National Defense Authorization Act. These include the Green Berets of the 1st Special Forces Group‚ which are permanently stationed at two bases of the 101st Amphibious Reconnaissance Battalion. The presence of Green Berets in Kinmen and another outlying island group called Penghu was recently confirmed by Taiwanese defense minister Chiu Kuo-cheng. Another aspect of the cooperation under the National Defense Authorization Act includes the Green Berets’ training of their counterparts in Taiwan on the use of the Black Hornet Nano‚ a small unmanned aerial vehicle that assists with portable surveillance and intelligence gathering. The Taiwanese Aviation and Special Forces Command has shown interest in buying these microdrones‚ which the US will likely oblige. Nobody actually believes that a group of US Army Special Forces stationed in Kinmen with small observation drones would make any difference if China launched an invasion. It would appear that this move serves as posturing against China‚ especially as a signal that America will brazenly and openly station special forces just miles from the mainland. It is nothing short of provocative‚ laying a tripwire for a miscalculation that could bring about the cross-strait conflict. Flare-Ups over Taiwan A few weeks after that revelation‚ tensions flared up around Kinmen when two Chinese fishermen drowned when their boat capsized following a chase by the Taiwanese coast guard under accusations of trespassing to which the Chinese coast guard responded by boarding a sightseeing boat and escorting it back to the island. The next day‚ the Taiwanese said that they drove off Chinese coast guard vessels that had entered the waters near the island. While these incidents did not result in more serious consequences‚ the increased attention on Kinmen is raising red flags that the island is once again becoming a hotspot for cross-strait tensions. Taiwan has been proclaimed an integral part of China by the People’s Republic with claims that extend much further back in time than before the end of the Chinese Civil War. Xi Jinping has staked his reputation and legacy on reunifying the island with the mainland. Top American intelligence officials say Xi has ordered his military to be ready to invade the island by 2027. Against this backdrop‚ the Chinese military has increased its deployment of air forces that cross into Taiwanese air identification zones‚ implemented maritime demonstrations‚ and thrown its weight around in the South China Sea as the world anticipates the worst for the self-governing island. Speaking to the Washington Post‚ Tom Shugart‚ adjunct senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security‚ said that “these drills keep getting bigger and bigger. As the number and frequency continues to grow‚ it naturally becomes that much harder to know whether next time is the real thing.” The US government’s stances and policies that openly place it in opposition to China in a geopolitical rivalry has pushed relations to ever-worse depths. Whose Doorstep&;#63; Chiang ends his documentary by asking‚ “When these young men arrive in Kinmen‚ will they be surprised‚ like I am‚ of the peaceful sunsets&;#63; The same ones that my father must have seen when he served here all those years ago&;#63; And by the kindness of the people here who are forever caught in between&;#63;” His words ring as true for the young Taiwanese men who go to Kinmen for their mandatory military service as it does for the American troops that are now stationed there. At the big picture level‚ Kinmen‚ Taiwan‚ and all of the inhabitants there are tragically in the crosshairs of the greater rivalry between the US and China. As was the case with the Ukraine narrative leading up to Russia’s invasion‚ the American narrative regarding Taiwan points to China’s provocative actions around Taiwan while waving off the possibility that Washington’s weapons deliveries and military buildup in that part of the Indo-Pacific region would be perceived as provocative from Beijing’s viewpoint. In a 2016 campaign speech‚ Hillary Clinton said that “Moscow has taken aggressive military action in Ukraine‚ right on NATO’s [the North Atlantic Treaty Organization] doorstep.” Whose doorstep now&;#63; A quick look at a map of where eastern Ukraine and Taiwan are in relation to the US‚ Russia‚ and China should give a sufficient impression of who’s on whose doorstep. It’s a shining example of Ron Paul’s “imagine” speech where the former Congressman preached the kind of strategic empathy that asks to put the shoe on the other foot‚ to see what things look like for the other side. What does it look like to China‚ then‚ when the superpower almost seven thousand miles across the Pacific openly places its special forces in viewing distance from China’s shores on an island in between the mainland and Taiwan&;#63; Who’s on whose doorstep&;#63; Learn Why The Globalists Are Killing Their Own Monetary System

Many products commonly found in pantries in American households contain chemical additives linked to cancer. Several US states are considering legislation to outlaw common snack foods following revelations these products contain chemical additives linked to cancer. Among the cancer-causing foods are many products commonly found in pantries in American households‚ including Flamin’ Hot Cheetos‚ General Mills’ Lucky Charms cereal‚ Oreo cookies and and Gatorade. Some of the artificial dyes targeted by lawmakers have been associated with serious health complications‚ including Yellow 6‚ found in Lucky Charms‚ which has reportedly been linked to adrenal tumors in rats‚ as well as DNA mutations‚ while Blue 1 – found in Oreo’s – has raised concerns over potential kidney tumors and nerve cell damage. Every day food snacks‚ facing ban because of cancer causing agents pic.twitter.com/QqgjpVypxq— Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸 (@KarluskaP) April 18‚ 2024 According to the Daily Mail‚ in addition to California’s “Skittles Ban” going into effect in 2027‚ states such as New York‚ Pennsylvania‚ Illinois‚ New Jersey and Missouri are also poised to enact some type of ban on carcinogenic food ingredients‚ which could force sweeping changes in the way the processed foods are produced.Survival Shield X-3 is BACK at the Infowars Store&;#33; Get 40% OFF on the next evolution in activated nascent iodine HERE “But some are seeking to go even further than the Golden State‚” the Mail notes. From the Daily Mail: New York’s bill calls for the ban of azodicarbinamide‚ used in breads and other baked goods‚ and butylated hydroxyanisole‚ a preservative used in processed meats.And lawmakers in Pennsylvania are calling for multiple food colorings — Red 40‚ Yellow 5‚ Yellow 6‚ Blue 1 and Blue 2 — to be outlawed‚ due to their links to hyperactivity in children. Pennsylvania’s ban is the most far-reaching because it targets five of the food coloring agents that are commonly used to give candies bright‚ attractive colors or to change the hues of processed foods to make them more appealing.  This infographic from the Mail lists various problematic snack food items‚ the chemical additives they contain‚ and the health complications they can cause. Consumer Reports food safety director Brian Ronholm noted‚ “The Food and Drug Administration’s system for ensuring that food additives are safe is broken.” “There is no consumer confusion on this issue—they want these chemicals out of foods. But when they see that the FDA has not been able to keep up with the latest research‚ and also see that the industry is already using substitutes in other countries‚ they recognize that the states are the only ones trying to protect them from toxic food chemicals right now.” Bonus — FLASHBACK SPECIAL REPORT — Food: The Ultimate Secret Exposed – Alex Jones’ Special Report

Much of the blame for the vaccines’ underperformance could be placed on Pfizer itself; the company relentlessly promoted hopelessly inaccurate efficacy estimates and supported efforts to unnecessarily mandate mRNA shots. There used to be a time where claims from pharmaceutical companies may have been treated with some degree of skepticism from major institutions and media outlets. Yet in late 2020 and into 2021‚ suddenly skepticism turned to complete blind faith. But what changed&;#63; Why‚ political incentives‚ of course&;#33; Initially‚ Covid vaccines produced by Pfizer were seen as dangerous and untested; they were considered a Trump vaccine that only idiots who were willing to risk their own health would take. However when the 2020 election had been officially decided‚ and Biden and his political allies represented the Covid vaccines as the pathway out of the pandemic‚ a moral choice that would help yourself and others‚ narratives and incentives changed dramatically. Pfizer became a heroic symbol of virtue‚ and all questioning of Covid vaccines was grounds for immediate expulsion from polite society‚ regardless of the actual efficacy of Pfizer’s products. Much of the blame for the vaccines’ underperformance could be placed on Pfizer itself; the company relentlessly promoted hopelessly inaccurate efficacy estimates and supported efforts to unnecessarily mandate mRNA shots. Our fan-favorite Turbo Force Plus is now 40% off&;#33; See for yourself the delicious one-of-a-kind energy boost infowarriors CRAVE&;#33; Sure enough‚ on the back of progressive orthodoxy‚ corporate and institutional incompetence and media activism‚ they proudly reported record revenues. We all know how that turned out in 2022 and 2023.  Skepticism towards Pfizer’s vaccine was obviously quite well warranted. And it turns out that now we‚ and of course‚ Pfizer’s chief promoters in the media and public health class should have been even more skeptical. They weren’t. Pfizer’s Claims On Covid Treatments Were Wildly Inaccurate As the Covid vaccines failed spectacularly to stop the spread of infections and did nothing to lessen all-cause mortality or even decrease population level Covid-associated deaths in highly vaccinated countries‚ Pfizer saw another opportunity. Sure‚ their signature product failed to perform as expected. So why not create another one as an antidote&;#63; Enter Paxlovid.  Paxlovid‚ an antiviral drug‚ was supposed to help individuals with symptomatic Covid‚ who’d already been infected‚ recover more quickly and lessen the risk of severe illness. Sounds great right&;#63;  It would appear that it sure did to Anthony Fauci and the cadre of media-promoted “experts.”  Fauci praised Paxlovid in 2022‚ after the mRNA vaccines and booster doses failed to prevent him from contracting Covid. Bizarrely‚ Fauci implied that the same Pfizer products that he demanded everyone take would not have been enough to keep him healthy‚ saying that he believed Paxlovid had kept him out of the hospital. Never mind‚ of course‚ that Fauci had a “rebound” case of Covid-19 after taking Paxlovid and getting vaccinated and boosted. Acknowledging imperfections would undercut his desire to get everyone to take more of his preferred products.  Paxlovid made headlines again later in 2022 as Rochelle Walensky also praised Pfizer’s efforts‚ despite once again testing positive for “rebound” Covid after Paxlovid treatments. Even today‚ the CDC’s own website says Paxlovid is an “effective” treatment for those who’ve contracted the virus and want to avoid severe illness.  There’s just one problem; it’s not true. A newly released study on Paxlovid on randomized adults with symptomatic Covid; one subset was given Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir) or a placebo every 12 hours for five days‚ with the intent of determining how effective it was at “sustained alleviation” of Covid-19 symptoms. In this phase 2–3 trial‚ we randomly assigned adults who had confirmed Covid-19 with symptom onset within the past 5 days in a 1:1 ratio to receive nirmatrelvir–ritonavir or placebo every 12 hours for 5 days. Patients who were fully vaccinated against Covid-19 and who had at least one risk factor for severe disease‚ as well as patients without such risk factors who had never been vaccinated against Covid-19 or had not been vaccinated within the previous year‚ were eligible for participation. Participants logged the presence and severity of prespecified Covid-19 signs and symptoms daily from day 1 through day 28. The primary end point was the time to sustained alleviation of all targeted Covid-19 signs and symptoms. Covid-19–related hospitalization and death from any cause were also assessed through day 28. Spoiler alert: it wasn’t effective at all. Their measured results revealed that there was effectively no difference whatsoever in the “sustained alleviation” of symptoms between Paxlovid and a placebo. Those taking Pfizer’s miracle antiviral treatment saw their “signs and symptoms” resolve after 12 days‚ while the placebo recipients took 13 days.  The median time to sustained alleviation of all targeted signs and symptoms of Covid-19 was 12 days in the nirmatrelvir–ritonavir group and 13 days in the placebo group (P=0.60). Five participants (0.8%) in the nirmatrelvir–ritonavir group and 10 (1.6%) in the placebo group were hospitalized for Covid-19 or died from any cause (difference‚ −0.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval‚ −2.0 to 0.4). This is the product that to this day is relentlessly promoted by the CDC‚ the media‚ and politicians as an effective tool to reduce the severity of symptoms and the length of illness. And it was virtually meaningless.  Even with regards to the most severe outcomes‚ hospitalization‚ and death‚ the difference was negligible. Confidence intervals for the difference in outcome even stretched to a positive relationship‚ meaning that it’s within the bounds of possibility that more people died or were hospitalized after taking Paxlovid than a placebo.  Succinctly‚ the researchers confirmed in their summary that there was no difference between the two treatments. The time to sustained alleviation of all signs and symptoms of Covid-19 did not differ significantly between participants who received nirmatrelvir–ritonavir and those who received placebo. But who are these researchers‚ you might ask…surely they’re fringe scientists‚ desperate to undercut a big‚ bad pharmaceutical company‚ right&;#63; How else could their conclusions so thoroughly undermine Pfizer&;#63; Let’s take a look at the disclosure to see who funded this study‚ designed the trial‚ conducted it‚ collected the data‚ and analyzed the results. Surely‚ that will reveal the nefarious intentions behind this dastardly attempt to cut at the heart of Pfizer’s miracle drug. Pfizer was responsible for the trial design and conduct and for data collection‚ analysis‚ and interpretation. The first draft of the manuscript was written by medical writers (funded by Pfizer) under direction from the authors. Oh. Oh no. Pfizer created the trial‚ conducted it‚ collected the data‚ and analyzed it. And it found that Paxlovid made no difference to the resolution of symptoms or with keeping people alive or out of the hospital. That has to sting. Even worse‚ Covid vaccination was once again proven to be almost entirely irrelevant where results were concerned. Results were the same between “high-risk subgroups‚” meaning those who had been vaccinated but had an elevated risk for more serious symptoms‚ and those who had never been vaccinated or had received the last dose more than a year ago. Similar results were observed in the high-risk subgroup (i.e.‚ participants who had been vaccinated and had at least one risk factor for severe illness) and in the standard-risk subgroup (i.e.‚ those who had no risk factors for severe illness and had never been vaccinated or had not been vaccinated within the previous 12 months). So not only did Paxlovid not make a difference‚ but vaccination status AND Paxlovid wasn’t enough to create a sizable gap in outcomes between healthy‚ unvaccinated individuals. But wait‚ there’s more.  Viral load rebounds were also more common in the Paxlovid group‚ and symptom and viral load rebounds combined were more common among those taking Pfizer’s treatment. While percentages were generally low‚ other studies have pegged Paxlovid-associated rebound as occurring nearly one quarter of the time.  So it’s not particularly effective at reducing symptoms or resolving them more quickly‚ doesn’t lead to statistically significant improvements in the most severe outcomes‚ and is more likely to result in a rebound case of the illness it’s supposed to be protecting you from. Sounds exactly like the type of product that Fauci‚ Walensky‚ and the CDC would praise‚ doesn’t it&;#63; Paxlovid is the entire Covid-pharmaceutical complex summarized perfectly. Created to solve a problem that was supposed to be fixed by another product…understudied‚ overhyped by the “experts‚” and prematurely authorized by a desperate FDA…and ultimately shown to be mostly ineffective. Once again‚ the actual science disproves The Scienceâ„¢. And once again‚ we’ll get no acknowledgment of it or apologies for the billions of taxpayer dollars wasted. Can’t wait to see what Pfizer does for an encore. Learn Why The Globalists Are Killing Their Own Monetary System

The connection between transgender individuals and mass murder cannot be ignored An 18-year-old transgender student was arrested on Wednesday after police learned of the individual’s plan to commit a mass shooting at her Maryland high school and a nearby elementary school. The Montgomery County Police Department (MCPD) found a 129-page “manifesto” written by the suspect‚ who is named Andrea Ye but goes by Alex. An 18-year-old high school student has been charged in connection with plans to commit a school shooting at a Montgomery County school.https://t.co/hdfRk7Rfys#MCPD #MCPNews pic.twitter.com/S8sqOH0bA5— Montgomery County Department of Police (@mcpnews) April 18‚ 2024 According to 7News Maryland Bureau Chief Brad Bell‚ “Ye is biologically female though identifies as male.” #BREAKING 18yo charged with threats of mass destruction. @mcpnews allege Andrea Ye‚ who prefers the name Alex and identifies as male‚ planned shootings at Wooten HS and Lakewood ES and detailed them in a manifesto. An 18 page charging doc includes a number of excerpts: pic.twitter.com/CDYEhI0CXJIntroducing Next Level Foundational Energy from Dr. Jones Naturals starting at 30% off&;#33; This cutting-edge dietary supplement is designed to elevate your energy levels and support your overall well-being.— Brad Bell (@Brad7News) April 18‚ 2024 Ye was previously receiving treatment at a psychiatric facility when another person in the psych ward learned of the manifesto and reported it to the police‚ fearing she’d act upon the “realistic” writings. Charging documents show Ye also told her counselor about urges to harm people‚ wanting to use a gun against innocents and even describing a hypothetical attack at her high school graduation. The individual allegedly hoped to achieve fame in connection with an act of mass murder.

Students claim furries causing distractions by biting‚ scratching‚ spraying air freshener on‚ barking at‚ and chasing other students. Students at a middle school in Utah walked out of class Wednesday in protest of a policy allowing peers to attend classes dressed in cartoonish animal costumes‚ otherwise known as “furries.” Mt. Nebo Middle School students report furries have been causing disruptions by biting‚ scratching‚ spraying air freshener on‚ barking at‚ and chasing other students‚ as detailed by ABC4.com. What a time to be alive.Yesterday‚ over 70 students walked out of Mt. Nebo School to protest the school for letting &;quot;furries&;quot; to bite‚ bark‚ &; lick them.ABC even interviewed a &;quot;member of the furry community&;quot; (they/them) to give a comment about the situation: pic.twitter.com/zIMjoy9U9b— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) April 18‚ 2024 Wednesday’s hours-long protest was evidently an effort by students to demand the district enforce its dress code policy‚ as put forth in a Change.org petition that’s received over 1‚400 signatures. Students reportedly carried signs reading‚ “Compelled speech is not free speech‚” “I will not comply‚” and “We just wanted to learn.”Survival Shield X-3 is BACK at the Infowars Store&;#33; Get 40% OFF on the next evolution in activated nascent iodine HERE “We’re standing up for what we believe is right‚” one student told the media outlet. Speaking to ABC4.com‚ a furry named Strudel explained‚ “Furry is a fandom‚” and claimed‚ “We don’t think that we’re animals.” “I really like the idea of animals that walk and talk‚ so I’m going to dress up as one‚ as kind of a fun sort of cosplay thing‚” described Strudel. The protest comes as some students claim furries have been acting out towards other members of the student body. “There was some kids dressed up as animals and I heard that another kid got bit by one of them‚” one parent told ABC4. “Back when I went to school‚ you couldn’t dress that way. You couldn’t do certain things‚ and I think it kind of has to go back a little bit. And I know kids need their own personalities‚ but it’s ridiculous when kids are dressing like animals and licking and biting people. I just don’t think that’s ok‚” she added. However‚ according to a district spokesperson‚ the problem has been embellished and possibly altogether fabricated. From ABC4: “A lot of the information that’s been put out there is completely incorrect and inaccurate‚” Nebo School District Public Information Officer Seth Sorensen told ABC4.com.While Sorensen said there have been issues with harassment or students making others feel uncomfortable or unsafe‚ he said most of the claims online are false.“The administration at the school addressed that with the entire student body and they sent out a couple of emails‚” Sorensen said. “Some of those emails were misinterpreted‚ and parents took to online formats to voice some of their concerns and questions.” Moreover‚ Sorensen said videos circulating online showing furries at school didn’t come from Mt. Nebo and called reports of furries “a little bit inaccurate.” “Today‚ we had some students and parents choose to exercise their right to assemble‚ and do a little protest for what they perceived was something that was happening in the school‚” he insisted. “It actually is not something that’s been occurring.” Even Strudel conceded school’s not the right place for cosplay‚ saying‚ “school is for learning.”