YubNub Social YubNub Social
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2026 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2026 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Daily Caller Feed
Daily Caller Feed
1 y

KJP Gets In Heated Exchange With Reporter As She Denies That Biden Called Trump Supporters ‘Garbage’
Favicon 
dailycaller.com

KJP Gets In Heated Exchange With Reporter As She Denies That Biden Called Trump Supporters ‘Garbage’

'Does he have any regret...?'
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Caller Feed
Daily Caller Feed
1 y

The Media Is The Biggest Dumpster Fire In America, But There’s A Close Runner-Up
Favicon 
dailycaller.com

The Media Is The Biggest Dumpster Fire In America, But There’s A Close Runner-Up

So this is less an indictment of the polls per se
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Caller Feed
Daily Caller Feed
1 y

FACT CHECK: Does Viral Video Show North Carolina Crowd At Harris Rally?
Favicon 
checkyourfact.com

FACT CHECK: Does Viral Video Show North Carolina Crowd At Harris Rally?

A post shared on X claims to depict a large North Carolina crowd at a rally for 2024 Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris. Holy shit, North Carolina is gonna elect Kamala Harris y’all,check out the crowd pic.twitter.com/tUsHNHpXYv — Henry Djoutsa ???? Supports?? (@D_jeneration) October 28, 2024 Verdict: False The video shows a concert that was […]
Like
Comment
Share
SciFi and Fantasy
SciFi and Fantasy  
1 y

Prepare Yourself for Baby Bear Cuteness in Latest Paddington in Peru Trailer
Favicon 
reactormag.com

Prepare Yourself for Baby Bear Cuteness in Latest Paddington in Peru Trailer

News Paddington in Peru Prepare Yourself for Baby Bear Cuteness in Latest Paddington in Peru Trailer Paddington also rides a llama By Vanessa Armstrong | Published on October 30, 2024 Credit: Sony Pictures Comment 0 Share New Share Credit: Sony Pictures We’ve already got a few trailers for the third Paddington film, Paddington in Peru. What those trailers didn’t have, however, are glimpses of everyone’s favorite bear as a wee one in the jungle. Today’s trailer rectifies that, and in it we see footage of Paddington as a baby cub in Peru, where he was adopted by his Aunt Lucy. In this film, Aunt Lucy has gone missing, and he, along with the Brown family and Mrs. Bird, leave London and head to his homeland to find her. In addition to seeing Paddington as a cute ‘lil cub, this trailer also features the bear riding a llama, as one does, and attempting to steer a riverboat. While in Peru, they not only meet a nun played by Olivia Colman and a riverboat captain portrayed by Antonio Banderas, the marmalade-loving bear and his friends, according to the synopsis, also have “thrilling escapades through the Amazon rainforest and up to the stunning mountain peaks of Peru. Together they encounter unexpected challenges, and Paddington begins to uncover surprising secrets about his past. Throughout the ups and downs, his unwavering optimism and kindness shine brightly in this brand-new Paddington cinematic adventure that reinforces the importance of family, and the joy of embracing one’s heritage.” We can see more of his adventures when Paddington in Peru premieres in theaters on January 17, 2025. Check out baby Paddington in the trailer below.[end-mark] The post Prepare Yourself for Baby Bear Cuteness in Latest <i>Paddington in Peru</i> Trailer appeared first on Reactor.
Like
Comment
Share
Fun Facts And Interesting Bits
Fun Facts And Interesting Bits
1 y

WIZARDS The Podcast Guide To Comics | Episode 99.5
Favicon 
theretronetwork.com

WIZARDS The Podcast Guide To Comics | Episode 99.5

Doom returns to pester Adam as he explores a Last Woman Standing battle between Vampirella and Buffy The Vampire Slayer, a Spawn movie sequel Casting Call, Top 10 Comics and more. Want to take your CONTINUE READING... The post WIZARDS The Podcast Guide To Comics | Episode 99.5 appeared first on The Retro Network.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
1 y

COVID-19 Misinformation: How Our Government Failed America
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

COVID-19 Misinformation: How Our Government Failed America

Biden-Harris administration officials seriously misled the American people during the COVID-19 pandemic. In a detailed and devastating report, the Republican majority of the House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations exposes “We Can Do This,” the administration’s two-year, $900 million public relations campaign during the pandemic. (The subcommittee is part of the House Energy and Commerce Committee.) The U.S. government’s massive PR effort focused on convincing the public that COVID-19 vaccines and vaccine mandates, masking (including the masking of children), and school closures were effective public policy interventions. To conduct its PR offensive, the Biden-Harris administration contracted with the Virginia-based Fors Marsh Group for its multimillion-dollar media campaign. That company, the subcommittee notes, describes itself as a “full-service behavior change research and strategy firm.”   Launched as a means to combat COVID-19 “misinformation” and “boost vaccine confidence and suppress public skepticism,” the administration’s campaign effort itself became a vehicle for imposing or recommending scientifically invalid public policies. Instead of “following the science,” the Biden-Harris administration’s agenda seemed to focus on shaping a dominant political narrative, echoed routinely in major media outlets. Ironically, the effort ultimately undermined confidence in the COVID-19 vaccines and helped to damage public trust in public health agencies.   The new House subcommittee report, chapter and verse, in charts and graphs, describes how and why this happened and how the federal government itself became a troubling source of “misinformation” amid one of the worst public health crises of modern times.        Vaccine Misinformation In 2021, the Biden-Harris administration declared a level of effectiveness for the COVID-19 vaccines that was not scientifically supported. In fact, when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued its emergency use authorization for Pfizer’s vaccine on Dec. 11, 2020, the agency was explicit: “At this time, data are not available to make a determination about how long the vaccine will provide protection, nor is there evidence that the vaccine prevents transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from person to person,” FDA said, using the scientific name of the coronavirus that causes COVID-19. The agency repeated this warning on the lack of evidence that the new vaccines would prevent transmission of the virus on Dec. 18, 2020, and again on Feb. 27, 2021. That, however, made little difference to the Biden-Harris administration. Its vaccine messaging initially was confused, then became inaccurate. In March 2021, Dr. Rochelle Walensky, then director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, declared that those who have been vaccinated “do not carry” the virus. This, though, was refuted quickly by career CDC staffers. Nonetheless, the Biden-Harris administration persisted. It argued that vaccines and boosters were necessary for school reopenings, even while insisting that vaccinated kids continue masking. It also recommended that healthy children (as young as 6 months old) get the vaccines even though their risk of severe illness and death was negligible. This vaccine policy made the U.S. an outlier among other advanced nations in the world, including the United Kingdom, France, Japan, Austria, and Germany. In September 2021, the Biden-Harris administration announced a series of unprecedented public- and private-sector vaccine mandates, affecting 100 million Americans. President Joe Biden insisted that the pandemic was a “pandemic of the unvaccinated.”  Such a claim was patently false. Vaccinated persons were routinely contracting the coronavirus at the time. And recall that FDA, as noted, had not determined that the COVID-19 vaccines would prevent transmission of the virus. So, the House subcommittee reports: “Despite this disclosure, high-ranking federal officials, including President Biden, knowingly made unsubstantiated claims about the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines.” In January 2022, the Supreme Court halted enforcement of most of the federal government’s vaccine mandates.   Masking Misinformation At the inception of the pandemic in January 2020, leading public health officials discouraged the use of masks to ward off the virus or discounted the effectiveness of masks. Suddenly, in April 2020, the CDC and its leading experts reversed their initial guidance against mask-wearing. By July, they declared masks a “critical tool” in the fight against COVID-19. Even the National Institutes of Health’s Dr. Anthony Fauci, who previously had dismissed masks as ineffective, soon advocated for aggressive adoption of local and national mask mandates. To this day, the scientific rationale for this radical reversal remains unclear. In January 2021, the new Biden-Harris administration imposed mask mandates on all persons 2 years old and older for domestic and international travel. In January 2022, the administration updated its masking guidelines. According to the House subcommittee report, many states followed CDC guidance to impose compulsory masking for about half of the nation’s 53 million schoolchildren. Parents who raised concerns about how mask mandates affected their children were dismissed as “anti-vax” or extremists, despite their valid worries. A 2022 Politico-Harvard survey found that nearly half of parents believed that harmed their children’s emotional development, speech, and social interactions—concerns later backed by research in the professional journal Public Health in Practice. Eventually, common sense aligned with scientific data. Dr. Ashish Jha, Biden’s White House COVID-19 coordinator, acknowledged in December 2022: “There is no study in the world that shows masks work that well.” By then, however, the damage to children was done. School Closures The epidemiological evidence, including CDC data, demonstrated overwhelmingly that children were not at elevated risk of serious illness or death from COVID-19. Despite mounting evidence that schools were not driving outbreaks, federal officials recommended extended school closures as a key feature of their COVID-19 response. By sharp contrast, many European countries followed a far more rational policy and reopened schools by mid-2020 with minimal spread of the disease. Yet, the CDC continued to push for school closures well into 2021. The Biden-Harris administration, through its high-priced PR campaign, doggedly emphasized masking, social distancing, and childhood COVID-19 vaccination even after it became clear that these policies weren’t necessary to keep schools open. The administration’s refusal to align policy recommendations with the data not only disrupted education with school closures but helped to undermine public trust in the CDC’s messaging. Politics, not science, influenced school closure policy. Congressional investigators revealed that teachers unions lobbied for extended closures and that the American Federation of Teachers influenced CDC policy. With schools around the nation closed, prolonged remote learning devastated children academically and emotionally; low-income students suffered the most, with big declines in math and reading scores. The cost of the CDC’s policy recommendations—academic regression, emotional hardship, developmental delays, and worsening social inequality—will be felt for years to come. Needed Reforms The next president and the new Congress must address the serious shortcomings of our federal public health agencies, especially the CDC, as The Heritage Foundation recommended.  Obviously, agency officials should be transparent, cooperative with congressional requests for information, and held directly accountable for their decisions. That’s why congressional investigators recommend in the report that Congress formally authorize the CDC, clearly define its role and responsibility, and clarify its “core mission.” That mission should be to protect the American people from deadly infectious diseases. Beyond that, based on its findings, the House subcommittee report makes several other positive recommendations. Among the most notable is that the CDC or any other public health agency should be prohibited from making claims about an FDA-approved product, such as a vaccine, that is incompatible with or goes beyond the FDA approval. Likewise, Congress also must address deficiencies in evaluating the safety of vaccines and improve the quality of data collection and reporting of adverse reactions or vaccine injuries. Reforming the federal public health agencies is a big job. The next presidential administration and the new Congress have a lot of work to do.     The post COVID-19 Misinformation: How Our Government Failed America appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
1 y

Betting Markets Have Trump Running the Table Days Before Election
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

Betting Markets Have Trump Running the Table Days Before Election

As Americans prepare to head to the polls on Nov. 5, some voters are putting their money where their mouth is by placing bets on the election’s outcome.  With less than a week left before the election, Polymarket, a betting platform and the world’s largest prediction market, gives former President Donald Trump a two-thirds chance (66.3%) of winning back the presidency. Vice President Kamala Harris has a one-in-three chance (33.8%).  Behind the overall odds of becoming president are Polymarket’s odds for Trump and Harris in the major swing states. Trump, according to Polymarket, is the favorite to win five of the six tracked swing states: Arizona, Georgia, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Michigan is currently a dead heat, while Polymarket does not include North Carolina among the swing states on its webpage.  Polymarket users are placing their bets on Trump in the state of Nevada, home to the gambling mecca of Las Vegas. Currently, the betting platform has Trump with a 66% chance of winning the Silver State, while Harris has a 34% chance.  The polls, however, show the race much closer. Real Clear Polling averages show Trump winning by only 0.7 of a percentage point. Why, then, do the betting markets seem fairly confident of a Trump victory there?  For one thing, Nevada is home to one of the highest unemployment rates in the country, at 5.6%. The state’s economy is still reeling from the havoc caused by the COVID-19 lockdowns. Trump is planning to address the housing crisis and inflation when he visits the state for a rally in Henderson on Thursday afternoon.  In Arizona, Trump is seen as having a 74% chance of winning, whereas Harris has just a 26% chance. However, Real Clear Polling averages show Trump winning by 1.3 percentage points. Trump won the state in 2016 by 3.6 points, but lost to Joe Biden in 2020 by 0.3%.  Polymarket shows Trump with a 73% chance of winning Georgia, Harris with a 27% chance.   Shelby Arnette moved to Georgia four years ago and has noticed that she and her husband are receiving different political messaging that seems to be targeted at their respective genders.  “I have seen different signs and things specifically advertising toward women to vote Democrat to have reproductive rights,” Arnette said.  There’s a smaller margin between Trump and Harris in Wisconsin, according to Polymarket, with a 55% chance of a Trump victory there and a 45% chance of Harris winning the state. In 2016, Trump won the state by 0.7%, but lost to Biden by 0.7% in 2020.  Polymarket shows a dead heat in Michigan, 50% to 50%. The state is still up for grabs, as Democrats are targeting women on the issue of abortion, while Trump is banking on support from the state’s autoworkers.  Trump invited a group of Arab and Muslim leaders to speak at his rally in Novi, Michigan, on Saturday.   “We as Muslims stand with President Trump because he promises peace, not war,” one speaker at the rally said. “We are supporting Donald Trump because he promised to end war in the Middle East and Ukraine. The bloodshed has to stop all over the world, and I think this man can make it happen.”  As all eyes turn to Pennsylvania, seen by many as the most important of the swing states, Polymarket shows Trump with a 62% chance of winning the state, with Harris trailing at a distant 38%. But again, Real Clear Polling averages put Trump in the lead by a much smaller margin—0.4 of a percentage point.   Pennsylvania resident Ruth Howard moved to the Keystone State from Oregon a few years ago. She said that she thinks Pennsylvania will play a pivotal role in the presidential election.  “I knew it was important to vote in [Oregon], but then coming to Pennsylvania, I feel like there’s a little more opportunity that my vote will make a difference, that it could help swing the state or politics in particular,” Howard said.   The post Betting Markets Have Trump Running the Table Days Before Election appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Reclaim The Net Feed
Reclaim The Net Feed
1 y

Harris-Walz Social Media Machine Is Silencing Critics and Boosting Supporters
Favicon 
reclaimthenet.org

Harris-Walz Social Media Machine Is Silencing Critics and Boosting Supporters

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The Kamala Harris campaign has been caught orchestrating a behind-the-scenes effort to manipulate social media platforms, including X, to stifle dissenting voices. Operating through a strategically organized Discord server, the Harris team has coordinated its volunteers and paid operatives to flood platforms with content and, more importantly, suppress any criticism or alternate viewpoints. According to a two-part report from The Federalist, the campaign’s activity includes the promotion of pro-Harris messages to simulate a groundswell of enthusiasm while encouraging supporters to target and downvote corrective notes added by X’s Community Notes feature. This tool, introduced by Elon Musk to foster transparency on X, allows users to flag misleading posts and add context to dubious claims. Musk’s acquisition of the platform was aimed at creating a more balanced environment, moving away from Twitter’s previous management that frequently drew criticism for silencing viewpoints. The Harris-Walz campaign, however, appears bent on undermining this system, directing volunteers to block any Community Notes that challenge their narratives, regardless of the notes’ accuracy. On Discord, paid Democratic staff members instruct supporters to artificially elevate pro-campaign notes while downvoting corrective ones. These actions, according to some involved, are part of a broader strategy to manipulate X’s visibility algorithm. This activity is not confined to X. Yesterday, reports highlighted that the campaign has also been successful in skewing Reddit’s algorithm. But X, given its political influence, has been a primary target. In one instance, a tweet from the campaign falsely quoted Trump, leading volunteers to downvote a Community Note that clarified the context of Trump’s statement, causing it to be suppressed. Harris’ posts remain largely untouched by X’s Community Notes due to these mass downvoting campaigns to suppress criticism. Discord discussions further reveal a campaign-led effort to “train” supporters on how to increase their Community Notes “Rating Impact,” enabling them to create notes themselves and upvote them to prominence. This carefully orchestrated strategy extends to other platforms like TikTok and Instagram, though their design limits political virality compared to Reddit and X. While rallying support and organizing digital outreach have become standard tactics in modern political campaigns, the strategic suppression of criticism through coordinated mass reporting, down-ranking, and flagging represents a shift with significant implications. Astroturfing—manufacturing the appearance of grassroots support—is commonly used to amplify a candidate’s visibility and sway public opinion. However, when campaigns direct their supporters to actively suppress dissenting voices, discredit community note mechanisms, or downvote corrective measures, it veers from advocacy into the territory of censorship. This tactic not only undermines the transparency and credibility of social media platforms but also risks eroding public trust in the authenticity of online discourse, blurring the line between legitimate campaigning and manipulation of the public conversation. Elon Musk says that X is investigating the findings. Read the full report at The Federalist here. If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The post Harris-Walz Social Media Machine Is Silencing Critics and Boosting Supporters appeared first on Reclaim The Net.
Like
Comment
Share
Hot Air Feed
Hot Air Feed
1 y

Trump's Closing Argument Is Strong
Favicon 
hotair.com

Trump's Closing Argument Is Strong

Trump's Closing Argument Is Strong
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
1 y

Washington Post Spins Furiously on 'Garbage'! 'Biden's Defense Is Entirely Plausible'
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

Washington Post Spins Furiously on 'Garbage'! 'Biden's Defense Is Entirely Plausible'

Aaron Blake is a "senior political reporter" at The Washington Post, for a section they call "The Fix." Well, Blake's pathetic attempt to help Joe Biden paper over what he quite obviously said is an attempt at "the fix," but it doesn't work. Biden said "Just the other day, a speaker at his rally called Puerto Rico a floating island of garbage...the only garbage I see floating out there is his supporters. His, his demonization of Latinos is unconscionable, and it’s un-American." The Washington Post headline:  Did Biden call Trump supporters ‘garbage’? It comes down to an apostrophe. Republicans have long strained for a new Hillary Clinton-"deplorables" moment, but Biden’s defense is entirely plausible. [Emphasis mine.] Blake recalled how Hillary Clinton calling Trump supporters a "basket of deplorables" may have kept her from winning in 2016. But Blake insists the Republicans can't make this stick:  Republicans’ latest entry on the eve of the 2024 campaign — President Joe Biden’s “garbage” comment Tuesday night — is more plausible than most as their hoped-for “deplorables” moment. But it’s still not nearly as ironclad as Clinton’s comments. And Biden’s increasing tendency to stumble over his words, which marred these very comments, makes it entirely plausible that he didn’t intend to tar large numbers of Trump supporters — as he soon clarified that he hadn’t. It may come down to the placement of an apostrophe, and it’s worth a parse. No. It’s not. It’s about as plausible as trying to argue that when Trump said you can grab ‘em by the pussy, he meant a cat. The Biden camp is trying to transcribe it this way: “The only garbage I see floating out there is his supporter’s — his — his — his demonization of Latinos is unconscionable, and it’s un-American.” Blake claimed this version was "entirely plausible. The context is clearly Biden talking about Hinchcliffe’s remark. Biden often speaks in non sequiturs, failing to finish his thoughts and shifting course midsentence, including in the Delaware comments that preceded his “garbage” remark. It’s basically the entire premise of Dana Carvey’s Biden impersonation on Saturday Night Live.” So they're using Biden's infirmity to spin out of this mess. As Biden himself often says, “I mean what I say; the problem is that I sometimes say all that I mean.” Just last week, he made a comment about locking Trump up — the kind of rhetoric Democrats have long criticized Trump and his supporters for — before catching himself. Somehow, despite all of the Democrat prosecutors trying to lock up Trump, this was spun as an innocent booboo, and not a political objective.  It's not helping Blake when Chris Cillizza -- his former colleague at "The Fix" -- said Blake's take was laughable.  Also the attempt to transcribe this by the White House as “supporter’s” as opposed to “supporters” — which he clearly says — is laughable. https://t.co/JEDvpHLDcF — Chris Cillizza (@ChrisCillizza) October 30, 2024 Responding to Cillizza, Michael LaRosa, Jill Biden’s former press secretary, the White House’s attempt to transcribe "supporters" as "supporter’s," was "a bonehead move and one they’ve been caught making before."
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 59461 out of 107405
  • 59457
  • 59458
  • 59459
  • 59460
  • 59461
  • 59462
  • 59463
  • 59464
  • 59465
  • 59466
  • 59467
  • 59468
  • 59469
  • 59470
  • 59471
  • 59472
  • 59473
  • 59474
  • 59475
  • 59476
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund