Mark Zuckerberg announced on Friday that his company Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, had abandoned its DEI practices. And so go the male tampons. The company told facilities managers to remove the tampons from the men’s bathrooms. It came directly from Mark Zuckerberg. No More Tampons in Men’s Rooms “That same day at Meta’s […] The post Zuckerberg Ordered the Removal of Tampons from Men’s Rooms appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

This is the tale of a baby donkey named Frosty who lives on a small Montana ranch. Frosty isn’t just tiny; he’s a miniature donkey and super-duper tiny. And ever so cute, but also a bit sassy. It’s important when working with animals to encourage new skills. However, encouragement might not be the best idea when the new skill is hurtful. @mr.winslow Frosty learned to kick overnight #minidonkeycolt #minidonkeys #babydonkey #babydonkeycuteness ♬ original sound – Mr.Winslow When it comes to being adorable, Frosty got a double scoop! The tiny silver baby donkey has a black stripe down his back, black ears, and white highlights that multiply the cute factor. Frosty’s newest skill is kicking, which he just learned. That means he is practicing almost constantly, much to the dismay of his human. Fortunately, most of his kicks are misplaced and don’t make contact. In addition to being sassy, Frosty is sometimes gassy. If you turn the volume up, you can hear the little tyke give a little toot in this video. @mr.winslow Rambunctious Frosty’s little toot #minidonkeycolt #minidonkeys #babydonkey #babydonkeycuteness #babydonkeynoises #italianchristmasdonkey ♬ original sound – Mr.Winslow If you find yourself falling in love with Frosty, you aren’t alone. You can find more Frosty content on the Mr. Winslow TikTok page. Although we’re pretty sure that humans run the page, Mr. Winslow is a white Persian cat who is pretty regal. There are plenty of videos with his antics also, and it is clear that he runs the ranch. Getting back to Frosty. He is a Christmas donkey, born about ten days before the holiday. He is growing quickly and getting more sassy every day. His mom, Twinkle, has her hooves full, trying to keep the little rascal in line. Frosty is already talking back, being very vocal for a baby donkey who just learned to talk! Please share if Frosty is too adorable to ignore. You can find the source of this story’s featured image here and here. The post Sassy Baby Mini Donkey Learns To Kick In Adorable Clip appeared first on InspireMore.

Oasis, one of the most influential British rock bands of the 1990s and 2000s, was formed in Manchester, England, in 1991. Originally called The Rain, the group was renamed after Liam Gallagher joined as lead vocalist. His brother Noel Gallagher became the band’s primary songwriter and lead guitarist, solidifying their lineup with Paul “Bonehead” Arthurs on rhythm guitar, Paul “Guigsy” McGuigan on bass, and Tony McCarroll on drums. The band’s debut album, Definitely Maybe (1994), became the fastest-selling debut album in the UK at the time, spearheaded by iconic tracks like “Live Forever” and “Supersonic.” Their follow-up, (What’s the Story) The post Complete List of Oasis Songs From A to Z appeared first on ClassicRockHistory.com.

Cinderella was an American rock band that formed in 1983 in Pennsylvania. The band became widely known during the late 1980s and early 1990s, thanks to their blend of glam metal, blues, and hard rock. With their catchy hooks, heartfelt ballads, and a gritty yet polished sound, Cinderella achieved significant commercial success, particularly with their 1986 debut album Night Songs and the follow-up, Long Cold Winter (1988). Their third album, Heartbreak Station (1990), further solidified their place in rock music. Although the band went on hiatus after the early 1990s, their influence continued through their popular songs like “Nobody’s Fool” The post Complete List Of Cinderella Band Members appeared first on ClassicRockHistory.com.

In the summer of 2020, a leaked Navy video showed a mysterious object darting through the skies off the coast of California. Military personnel described the object as performing maneuvers defying the known laws of physics. Yet, when questioned, government officials were quick to dismiss the incident, attributing the anomaly to drones or weather phenomena. For many, the explanation was underwhelming, raising a bigger question: why does the government seem so intent on labeling UFOs as drones? Now unidentified light orbs were spotted hovering over urban centers, oceans, other countries, moving in patterns inconsistent with known drone technology. Despite public outcry, officials quickly dismissed these sightings as drones, often without presenting evidence to support the claim. These light orbs, seen darting at incredible speeds and vanishing abruptly, bear striking similarities to historical UAP sightings, yet the “drone” label persists, raising questions about the government’s intent to downplay or obscure the phenomena. The term UFO, or Unidentified Flying Object, has long been a cultural lightning rod. But over the past decade, the U.S. government has systematically reframed the narrative, opting for the term UAP—Unidentified Aerial Phenomena—and often explaining sightings as mundane misidentifications or foreign drones. A History of Evasion Government obfuscation surrounding UFOs is not new. In the late 1940s, sightings of unidentified objects surged, prompting the Air Force to launch Project Blue Book. The program’s stated goal was to determine if UFOs posed a national security threat. By the time it was shut down in 1969, the official conclusion was that most sightings were either natural phenomena or hoaxes. Skeptics argued that the project’s primary aim was not investigation but public reassurance. Fast-forward to 2017, when The New York Times revealed the existence of the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), a Pentagon initiative quietly investigating UFOs. Videos released alongside the report depicted inexplicable aerial maneuvers. The government’s acknowledgment of AATIP marked a seismic shift, yet officials were quick to downplay its significance, emphasizing prosaic explanations for the sightings. In 2021, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) released a preliminary report on UAPs, analyzing 144 incidents. While officials admitted that most cases remained unexplained, they suggested foreign adversaries—not extraterrestrial beings—as the likeliest culprits. The term “drones” began to dominate the discourse. Evidence Contradicting the Drone Narrative The government’s drone explanation, however, raises more questions than it answers. In numerous cases, the objects in question display capabilities far exceeding current drone technology. On July 1, 2023, a Pentagon official at NASA headquarters calmly stated, ‘We see these metallic spheres all over the world, making maneuvers we can’t explain…moving at Mach 2 against the wind, with no apparent propulsion.” Navy pilots have described encounters with objects accelerating from a standstill to hypersonic speeds in seconds, making abrupt turns without visible propulsion systems. These objects often evade radar or display signatures inconsistent with known aircraft. Commercial and military drones are limited by battery life and fuel capacity. Yet, some UAPs have been observed hovering or performing complex maneuvers for extended periods. Reports document objects seamlessly transitioning between air and water, a capability unmatched by any known drone technology. Given these attributes, the suggestion that these phenomena are merely drones seems insufficient. Experts argue that even the most advanced technologies developed by foreign powers like China or Russia would likely leave some trace—a supply chain, a scientific paper, or a whistleblower. Motivations Behind the Misinformation Why, then, does the government persist in labeling these sightings as drones? Admitting ignorance about UAPs—or worse, acknowledging them as non-human—could undermine public confidence and national security. Labeling them as drones allows authorities to frame the issue within a familiar context. Some UAP sightings may indeed involve classified military projects. By attributing sightings to foreign drones, the government diverts attention away from its own experimental technologies. UFOs carry cultural baggage, conjuring conspiracy theories and public hysteria. Rebranding them as UAPs and offering plausible, terrestrial explanations helps the government maintain control over the discourse. Some experts suggest that even the military lacks a full understanding of UAPs. In the absence of concrete answers, attributing sightings to drones is an expedient way to close the case. Despite official denials, insiders have come forward with conflicting accounts. In July 2023, former intelligence officer David Grusch testified before Congress, alleging that the U.S. possesses recovered non-human spacecraft and has engaged in decades-long efforts to reverse-engineer the technology. Grusch’s claims, while sensational, were made under oath and accompanied by calls for greater transparency. Other whistleblowers have corroborated aspects of Grusch’s testimony, describing secret programs and unexplained recoveries. The Public’s Right to Know At the heart of this issue lies a fundamental question: does the public have the right to know the truth about UFOs? Withholding information erodes trust in institutions. If UAPs represent advanced technologies—whether human or otherwise—studying them could yield breakthroughs in energy, propulsion, and materials science. Obfuscation, they argue, delays potential progress. Congressional hearings on UAPs—once unthinkable—have become a regular occurrence. Lawmakers from both parties have demanded clearer answers, citing concerns about aviation safety and national security. However, meaningful change requires more than hearings. Establishing non-governmental panels to study UAP incidents, ensuring objectivity and public access to findings. Releasing historical and contemporary UAP files, redacting only what is necessary for national security. Allocating resources to study UAPs through reputable scientific institutions. Strengthening protections for individuals who come forward with information about UAP programs. The government’s tendency to ignore UFO sightings as drone activity reflects a broader pattern of evading responsibility. While concerns about national security are valid, they do not justify withholding information or offering implausible explanations. The public deserves to know what’s out there. Tim Burchett: "It's either from the extraterrestrial, or something we have in our Skunkworks that we are reverse engineering." pic.twitter.com/8Pz0n2D9uw — Neil Thomas Goodman (@Neil__Goodman) January 12, 2025 The post Why Is the Government Calling UFOs Drones? appeared first on Anomalien.com.

Taxpayer-funded National Public Radio relished describing Donald Trump with words "criminal" and "convicted" and especially a “convicted felon.” Friday’s sentencing in New York offered a golden opportunity. I could tell this was coming because in Friday's 9am top-of-hour newscast, they talked of Trump's "criminal sentencing" three times.  On Friday’s Morning Edition, anchor A Martinez announced “he will come away with a criminal record.” They used “convicted” six times. Reporter Ximena Bustillo said “even with a criminal conviction, voters elected him to the White House,” so he “will become the first convicted felon sworn into the Oval Office.” STEVE INSKEEP, anchor: What was it that Trump was convicted of? BUSTILLO: The jurors ultimately convicted Trump of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. On Friday’s All Things Considered, anchor Juana Summers and reporter Andrea Bernstein used “convicted” five times to thrill their leftist audience. Summers began: "New York Judge Juan Merchan sentenced President-elect Donald Trump today for concealing payments to a porn star to influence the 2016 election. Trump's sentence of unconditional discharge means he'll have no jail time, probation or fines, but it does mean the criminal trial has left him a sentenced, convicted felon 10 days before he takes the oath of office." Bernstein explained: “So throughout this case, which started years ago, we didn't know would Trump be charged, tried, convicted. But today we knew the outcome because last week the judge said there would be no jail time.” Later, Bernstein praised Merchan as "deliberative," and "taking into account all sides," but "He said this was a serious crime Trump was convicted of, that it has what lawyers call gravamen, precisely because, quote, "it was the premeditated and continuous deception by the leader of the free world that is the gravamen of this offense." And this is how it ended:  BERNSTEIN: Trump becomes the first U.S. president to enter office a convicted felon. SUMMERS: That's right -- a convicted felon. On Saturday morning's Weekend Edition, there was anchor Scott Simon in their Week in Review segment: "Yesterday Donald Trump sentenced in New York for the hush-money trial - no jail time, no other punishment. There is the notoriety, of course, of being the first convicted felon to be inaugurated as president." Typically, none of these reports even mentioned this case was brought by Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg, a Democrat elected on a promise to get Trump. None of them mentioned that "deliberative" Judge Merchan donated to Joe Biden and the "Progressive Turnout Project" (a small amount), and his daughter Loren Merchan is a professional Democrat who worked for Kamala Harris's 2020 campaign (and was paid by the 2024 Kamala campaign as well). Trump is quoted as calling it a "witch hunt," and then the media skip all evidence that underlines their partisanship. Our Rich Noyes study found ABC, CBS, and NBC avoided mentioning the Democrat affiliations in 90 percent of their stories on Trump's legal cases. In Bragg's case, we found CBS filed 48 stories and never mentioned Bragg was a Democrat.

Nigeria is a youthful, fast-growing country with an estimated population of over 235 million. According to the CIA Worldbook's 2018 estimate, roughly 53.5% of the Nigerian population is Muslim and roughly 45.9% of the population is Christian — 10.6% of which is Roman Catholic. While Nigeria is now home to around 100 million Christians — the sixth-largest Christian population in the world as of 2019 — numbers have proven no guarantee of protection for the faithful against intense persecution, especially not from the jihadist groups hell-bent on totally transforming Nigeria into an Islamist nation. This persecution takes various forms, one of which is kidnapping. Although the former British colony sees millions of kidnappings every year, it is clear that many are religiously and/or ideologically motivated, especially when it comes to the persistent abductions of priests. Terrorism and conquest Nigeria is plagued by Islamic terrorists and gangs, including the al-Qaeda-affiliated outfit Ansaru, Islamic State of West African Province, and the terrorist group Boko Haram, which has reportedly killed over an estimated 36,000 people over the past two decades. Some academics have warned against similarly recognizing elements of the deadlier, mass-killing Fulani herder-militant groups as religiously motivated terrorists, and others have suggested their attacks are instead economically or climate-driven. However, Nigerian Christians such as Bishop Wilfred Chikpa Anagbe of the Diocese of Makurdi recognize that the Fulani herders' apparent systematic killing of Christians also has "a motive of religion behind it." Bishop Anagbe said in 2021, "The Fulani killers are Muslims, and the conquering of territory is paramount to large Muslim populations in Nigeria." 'I classify them as terrorists now.' Jeff King, president of International Christian Concern and a leading expert on religious persecution, told Blaze News that like Boko Haram, the Fulani militants, a group of traditionally nomadic cattle herders seeking greater grazing lands for their livestock, "are also driven by Islam's practice of using violence to subjugate territories to Islam. In fact, the Fulanis are the driving force behind radical Islam's massive land-grab of a huge swath of Africa known as the Sahel. They are motivated by a desire to rebuild a caliphate they had built in the 1700s and 1800s." Christians in the region have long suffered the savagery of these Muslim groups. For instance, on July 19, 2024, Islamic Fulani militants reportedly dragged Christians out of their homes in Benue State and shot them, leaving 18 dead and many more wounded, reported ICN. "I no longer call them bandits because I'm seeing elements of terrorism in their activities," Justine Shaku, the chairman of the local Katsina Ala government, said in a statement. "I classify them as terrorists now." 'Gaza and Ukraine are deadly, but if you're a Christian, the most likely place in the world to be hunted and killed is Nigeria.' Muslim Fulani militants also massacred hundreds of Christians in over 160 villages on Christmas 2023, burning down eight churches in the process. On June 5, 2022, terrorists later identified by the Nigerian government as members of ISIS-West Africa stormed into St. Francis Xavier Catholic Church in the southwestern city of Owo, where parishioners were celebrating Pentecost Sunday. The terrorists slaughtered at least 41 parishioners, including children — some reports indicated more than 80 victims killed in the church — and brutally injured scores of others. Mark Hill, a visiting professor of law and distinguished fellow at the University of Notre Dame, and Thomas Hellenbrand of the Society of Jesus noted in a 2022 paper that violence between Nigeria's religious and ethnic groups has worsened over the past two decades "due in part to the enlargement of the jurisdiction of Sharia Courts of Appeal in twelve Nigerian states after 1999, which have allowed the courts to handle Islamic criminal law, and are generally considered better run than their civil equivalents." "Islamic jihadists in the north have attempted to use Sharia law to mobilize Muslims against minority Christian communities, notwithstanding the long-standing peaceful coexistence of indigenous Christian minorities in states such as Kano, Jihawa, Katsina, Zamfara, and Kebbi." The Christian persecution watchdog Open Doors now ranks Nigeria as the sixth-worst place for Christians in the world: More believers are killed for their faith in Nigeria each year than everywhere else in the world combined. The attacks are often brutal in nature and can involve destruction of properties, abductions for ransom, sexual violence and death. Believers are stripped of their livelihoods and driven from their homes, leaving a trail of grief and trauma. Violence by Islamic extremist groups such as Fulani militants, Boko Haram and ISWAP (Islamic State in West African Province) increased during the presidency of Muhammadu Buhari, putting Nigeria at the epicenter of targeted violence against the church. The government's failure to protect Christians and punish perpetrators has only strengthened the militants' influence. Ryan Brown, the CEO of Open Doors US, said in a statement to Blaze News, "More believers are killed for their faith in Nigeria than anywhere else in the world." Mindy Belz, an American journalist who has covered wars in Africa and the Middle East, emphasized the gravity of the situation last year in the Wall Street Journal, writing, "Gaza and Ukraine are deadly, but if you're a Christian, the most likely place in the world to be hunted and killed is Nigeria — a diverse country with a constitutional federal government and one of Africa's largest economies." Despite their apparent bloodthirst, some Islamic terrorists and gangs have realized that victims are more valuable alive. Captive shepherds While groups like Boko Haram may still partially fund their operations through illegal mining, holding priests and seminarians captive now serves as an additional revenue stream as well a strategic means of disrupting Christian communities. The Catholic Church, a popular target for extremists in the region, does not officially pay ransoms as a matter of policy; however, parishioners and others in the church routinely front the cash to spring the abducted church personnel, saving lives on the one hand but risking perpetuating the cycle of victimization on the other. Maria Lozano, press director at the pastoral Catholic aid organization Aid to the Church in Need International, told Blaze News that "if ransoms are paid, it is usually because the parishioners, some financially well off faithful, and the families have collectively gathered the requested funds." Bishop Matthew Hassan Kukah of Nigeria's Sokota Diocese admitted in 2023 to shelling out roughly $37,200 to rescue church personnel from kidnappers. "Many things have happened to us in Sokoto. We have had our churches burned down, the killing of Deborah Emmanuel [a Nigerian Christian student who was stoned to death by a Muslim mob], our cathedral was almost burned down, and my priests were almost killed," Kukah told ACI Africa. "I have lost a seminarian, I've lost a priest; we have spent over 30 million naira which we don't have to rescue our pastoral agents from kidnappers." In the past several months alone, there have been numerous abductions, including: Fr. Gerald Ohaeri, a member of the Missionary Society of the Holy Spirit, who was kidnapped on Nov. 30, 2024, after celebrating Mass, then released on Dec. 4; Fr. Christian Uchegbu, a priest in the Diocese of Orlu, who was kidnapped on Nov. 6, 2024; Fr. Emmanuel Azubuike, the parish priest at St. Theresa's Church in the Diocese of Okigwe, who was kidnapped on Nov. 5, 2024, then released on Nov. 11; Fr. Thomas Oyode, the rector of the Immaculate Conception Minor Seminary in the Diocese of Auchi, who was kidnapped on Oct. 27, 2024, then freed on Nov. 7; Fr. Mikah Suleiman, the parish priest at St. Raymond Damba in the Diocese of Sokoto, who was kidnapped on June 22, 2024, then freed by July 7; Fr. Christian Ike, the parish priest at St. Matthew's Church in the Diocese of Ekwulobia, who was kidnapped along with a parishioner, Ogbonnia Aneke, on June 16; Fr. Gabriel Ukeh, a priest in the Diocese of Kafanchan, who was kidnapped on June 9, 2024, then freed the next day; Fr. Oliver Buba, a priest in the Diocese of Yola, who was kidnapped on May 21, 2024, then freed on May 30; Fr. Basil Gbuzuo, a priest in the Archdiocese of Onitsha, who was kidnapped on May 15, 2024, then abandoned on May 23; Frs. Kenneth Kanwa and Jude Nwachukwu, priests at St. Vincent de Paul Fier Parish in the Diocese of Pankshin, who were kidnapped on Feb. 1, 2024, then released on Feb. 8; and Fr. Thaddeus Tarhembe, the parish priest of St. Ann’s Sarkin Kudu Parish in the Diocese of Wukari, who was kidnapped on Oct. 29, 2023, then released the following day. The radicals who target priests and seminarians sometimes butcher their victims. For instance, Fr. Tobias Chukwujekwu Okonkwo, a 38-year-old priest and pharmacist, was reportedly murdered on Dec. 26, 2024. The previous year, Fr. Isaac Achi was burned alive by Islamic terrorists. Crux reported that two years after jihadists bombed his church in Madalla on Christmas Day, killing 44 parishioners, Achi was kidnapped by militants. Although he survived, years later, Islamic gunmen would once again storm into his church, this time Saints Peter and Paul Church in Niger State, yelling, "Allahu Akbar." The gunmen in the deadly January 2023 attack held Achi and another priest, Fr. Collins Omeh, at gunpoint. After Achi urged his fellow priest to escape, both priests were shot, but Omeh still managed to get away. Angered by the turn of events and Achi's heroism, the gunmen set fire to the rectory, leaving the wounded priest to die in the inferno. "It's got to a point where out of ten [priests] in Nigeria, four are at risk of being kidnapped," Nigerian criminologist Emeka Umeagbalasi told the Tablet in June. "Out of that four, one or two are at high risk of being killed in captivity." Blaze News reached out to various Nigerian Catholic dioceses impacted by the kidnappings for comment, including the Archdioceses of Abuja and Lagos and the Dioceses of Auchi, Awka, Minna, and Wukari, but did not receive responses by deadline. Money and the 'stealth jihad' King told Blaze News that "these abductions are often used to spread fear, fund further terror activity, or force conversions, targeting Christian communities to undermine their stability and presence." "There is substantial evidence that clergymen and seminarians in Nigeria are specifically targeted due to their Christian faith and their potential deep pockets," continued King. "This targeting is part of a broader strategy by groups like Boko Haram and Fulani Islamist militants to eliminate Christian influence, as noted by the systematic attacks on churches and church leaders." Lozano noted that priests and religious sisters are also prime targets because they "don't hesitate to be present in places that many people avoid working on." "Priests are frequently abducted in areas affected by conflict, extremism, or political instability, where they may be seen as representatives of a specific faith or because they are considered easy targets," added Lozano. Just as with the broader persecution of Christians in the region, religion appears to be a major factor when it comes to the abductions, though Lozano noted there are other factors at play. Catholic priests and seminarians are often targeted because of their faith, particularly by Islamic extremists. However, it's important to understand the broader dynamics in Nigeria. We must differentiate between regions such as the Middle Belt, Maiduguri, Kaduna, Benin, and Lagos, as the motivations behind these attacks can vary. In some cases, priests are targeted directly because of their faith, while in others, the primary motive may be linked to the general lawlessness and insecurity in the region. There are economic kidnappings perpetrated by criminals who are only looking for quick money. Kidnapping has become a business in many cases. However, priests and seminarians are vulnerable in all cases due to their commitment to serve. Archbishop Kaigama of Abuja similarly suggested to ACN in 2021 — after Bishop Moses Chikwe of the Catholic Archdiocese of Owerri was kidnapped by armed bandits — that while there were criminals undertaking abductions for "quick money," there were also Islamists seeking to "conquer those they consider infidels, and Christians are number one on their list." Umeagbalasi noted that priest kidnappings in the north of the country are usually conducted by jihadists "in furtherance of their quest to Islamize Nigeria. Those who kidnap priests in the eastern part of the country are out for ransom payments." 'The Islamist deep state in Nigeria is aiding and abetting a stealth jihad.' Archbishop Kaigama noted that the kidnapping situation is "a disease that is spreading without any significant effort being made to stop it." While the kidnapping of religious leaders amounted to an escalation and "big news," Kaigama noted that multitudes of other Nigerians are suffering the same fates: "They are what I would call silent victims, and there are many of them." According to the Crime Experience and Security Perception Survey released by Nigeria's National Bureau of Statistics in December, over 2.2 million Nigerians were kidnapped between May 2023 and April 2024. Among the households that suffered kidnapping incidents, 65% reportedly paid a ransom. The survey indicated that Nigerians paid over $1.42 billion at the current exchange rate as ransom during that time period. While the Catholic Church reportedly invests heavily in prevention measures as well as in training priests and nuns on how to deal with these frequently occurring hostilities, Lozano indicated that "governments must invest in improving law enforcement capabilities, especially in regions where abductions are most prevalent." Extra to training police, improving resources for intelligence gathering, reinforcing border patrol to curb human trafficking across state lines, and promoting religious dialogue, Lozano suggested that the influence of extremist groups and criminal organizations can be reduced by “tackling poverty, fighting corruption, and promoting economic development." Governmental indifference — or worse When asked whether Nigeria's federal government and law enforcement have done enough to help victims and to protect Catholics in the country, Lozano noted that the response has "been criticized for being insufficient. Catholics and Nigerians, in general, do not feel that they are being well protected." The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom indicated in its 2024 annual report that the government not only failed to prevent attacks against Christians and churches but has faced accusations of actually fomenting certain attacks. King told Blaze News, "The Nigerian government has done nothing for two decades despite the approximately 100,000 Christians killed and 3.5 million Christian farmers and families displaced. Perpetrators are very rarely engaged or chased down by the military. In fact, many report that the military has cordoned off Christian areas for attackers to enter. In the very rare instances where we see a quick military response [it] is when Christians have responded to attackers with gunfire." "To be very frank and impolitic, the simple and obvious truth is that the Islamist deep state in Nigeria is aiding and abetting a stealth jihad and slow-moving genocide against Christians in Nigeria," said King. "Until the international community (especially the U.S.) cries foul and says 'no more,' it will continue. President Trump will hopefully lead the way." Trump stated in an October post on Truth Social, "When I am President, I will protect persecuted Christians." Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) echoed Trump on Oct. 23, writing, "The United States should fight against the persecution of Christians all over the world, and it will when President Trump is back in the White House." The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom recommended in its latest report that the the U.S. government "designate Nigeria as a 'country of particular concern,' or CPC, for engaging in systematic, ongoing, and egregious violations of religious freedom." The Biden State Department previously dropped the country's CPC designation. The USCIRF also recommended that Congress ask the Government Accountability Office to investigate the effectiveness of American aid to Nigeria in achieving religious freedom objectives in the country. When asked about what the faithful at home can do, King and Lozano both emphasized the importance of prayer, advocacy, and financial support. "Nigeria needs our prayers, but it also requires our support, both financial and advocacy," said Lozano. "People can raise awareness about the situation in Nigeria. Sharing information about the persecution of Catholics and other religious minorities helps to bring global attention to the crisis, which can, in turn, lead to greater support from international communities. It is good to advocate for Nigeria by urging governments, international organizations, and institutions to take a stronger stance against religious persecution. This includes urging for diplomatic pressure, greater law enforcement, and the protection of religious freedoms in Nigeria." Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Do you live in a red state, a blue state, or one where Republicans and Democrats share power?Your answer might provide the best indicator of what to expect from your governor and state lawmakers as President-elect Donald Trump takes office and legislatures convene.In many...

Chinese and Indian refiners will source more oil from the Middle East, Africa and the Americas, boosting prices and freight costs, as new U.S. sanctions on Russian producers and ships curb supplies to Moscow's top customers, traders and analysts said.The U.S. Treasury on...