101 Bug Out Bag Items You Might Have Forgotten

15 Steps to Take Immediately after an EMP Event

Test Your Crocks For Lead.

DIY Worm Compost Tower

Are You Ready Series: Wildfire Preparedness

3 Free Things that Make My Days Better

Recession Coming? Job Growth Lays an Egg in July

While we’re lovers of all kinds of animals here at IFLScience, even we have to admit that some of them do look quite spectacularly silly – which arguably, makes us love them even more.Continue reading to discover some of our favorites…Arabian sand boaOur first animal was described by one member of the IFLScience team as “when you buy a snake from Wish” and frankly, that’s a pretty accurate assessment of the Arabian sand boa (Eryx jayakari).When someone on the internet says "snek", this is what we picture.Image credit: Dan_Koleska/Shutterstock.comEndemic to the deserts of the Arabian Peninsula and western parts of Iran, these relatively small, non-venomous reptiles might look like someone forgot where the eyes go on a snake, but there’s a very good reason why they’re on top of its head rather than the side.Arabian sand boas spend most of their time hiding under the sand. When the night draws in, aka the time for a tasty little rodent snack, having eyes on top means they can stay buried within the sand whilst keeping an eye out for prey, making it easier to take it by surprise.Essentially, having derpy eyes means they can sit pretty and wait for the food to come to them, which sounds like a regular Friday night for many of us humans.Irrawaddy dolphin10/10 would pat (but please don't).Image credit: Jodphoto/Shutterstock.comIrrawaddy dolphins (Orcaella brevirostris) are most likely how I would’ve drawn a dolphin when I was a kid (and now, if we’re being honest). Unlike the more pointed snouts seen in the more well-known bottlenose dolphin, this species has no distinct beak and a pronounced rounded head.Combine that with the arm-roll-on-a-baby-esque creases from their unusually flexible necks, general chonkiness, and smile-like expression, and you’ve got yourself a thoroughly friend-shaped looking animal.Unfortunately, Irrawaddy dolphins are also an endangered species, with human activity bringing them to the brink of extinction in the late 20th century – but thanks to 21st-century conservation efforts, their numbers were recently reported to have increased in Cambodia.  Tibetan foxIt’s safe to say that Tibetan foxes (Vulpes ferrilata) look quite different from the red foxes that many of us will be familiar with. “Is it just me or do Tibetan foxes just look like someone tried to draw a normal fox and it kinda sucked[?]” posted one Reddit user. Others have said they look like taxidermy gone wrong or the result of a bee sting.Tibetan foxes' snack of choice is the plateau pika.Image credit: han longwei/Shutterstock.comLooking at these creatures, such comments aren’t all that surprising. Tibetan foxes have big heads with square-shaped faces and small, triangular ears. Quite why that’s the case is unclear, particularly as their skulls are quite similar to those of their red fox relations.Rain frogsThe epitome of the slang term "angy".Image credit: Lauren Suryanata/Shutterstock.comIf someone was asked to draw a small, angry frog from memory, we imagine it would probably look something like a rain frog, a whole group of adorably small, grumpy looking amphibians that give off the same energy as an unentertained Boo in Monsters Inc.While this has seen them earn a place on many “cute animal” lists, one member of the gang, the common rain frog (Breviceps adspersus), is perhaps better known on the internet as the frog with “buttcheeks”.View this post on InstagramA post shared by (@marron.chestnut777) IFLScience is not responsible for content shared from external sites.Obviously, it would be hilarious for a caked-up frog to exist, but sadly, saying it has buttcheeks isn’t quite accurate. As fact-checking site Snopes pointed out, it’s actually the frog’s cloaca, the chamber where the intestinal, reproductive, and urinary systems all link up and let their contents out.If you’re on the lookout for other unusual-looking animals, check out the breed of goat that appears less like someone drew it from the memory of a regular goat and more like the memory of their sleep paralysis demon.

Surprising few, Donald Trump chose JD Vance as his running mate; surprising many, almost instantaneously, word went out across the Democrats’ elite that the hit on Vance would be that he was “weird.” Soon thereafter, the intended smear was spread to Trump himself. The commentariat weighed in, the public square pulsed with reactions, and the blowback began. Many found it weird that Vance, who’d previously been more susceptible to hostile classification by the lefty meme ironically begging for “the confidence of an average white man,” was now being attacked as an oddball — often by people who, to put it charitably, presented with an eccentricity so extreme that just 10 years ago, it was all but absent from public life. How the normies of today can be attacked as weird by today’s freakazoids ... But there was another kind of pushback in defense of Vance: Not only was he weird, his weirdness went far beyond his critics’ imagination — and that was a good thing. Perfect case in point — the Atlantic’s attempt to portray Vance as weird depicted him in a political cartoon as a wizard out of Tolkien toking richly on a most mystical pipe. Seemingly unpredictably, accounts on X started half-joking that Vance was, indeed, wyrd, a figure of destiny straight out of the 1400s, when, as the etymology dictionaries will tell you, that word first appeared. This kind of leap may strike many normal Americans as the “real” weird, one that didn’t really influence public life before the internet and now seems to be everywhere, as ever more obscure and bizarre identities double and triple down on what’s least accessible about them to outsiders. And it’s not that hard to see how the force of this identitarian logic points, as Marshall McLuhan observed decades ago, in the reifying and deifying direction “from cliche to archetype.” All over the internet and our digitally influenced society, we now see affinity and identity groups elevating representative people to what the gamers call “god-tier” — a symbolically superhuman status meant to capture and express the “eternal” about the identity in question. But thanks to my years of obscure McLuhanverse studies, nothing about these uncanny trends was weird or surprising to me. I learned in the late 2010s that the rise of digital technology “retrieved,” in McLuhanite speak, “the medieval.” The immense power of digital machines to record and recollect was refounding our interior and exterior experience in a way that privileged memory over the master faculty of modernity, imagination. That topsy-turvy transformation returned us to a collective cast of mind last shared in premodern times. It was a change massively intensified by the fact that our machines’ dominance over us in recollective power returned us to fundamental questions that our prior worship of imagination only temporarily muted — questions like who we as humans really are and why. These questions, ultimately theological, demanded theological answers ... and the last time society so tightly revolved around the question of the human and the divine was the Middle Ages. And so it could come to pass that I logged on in spring of 2021 to post that the rise of digital tech heralded weird's fall and wyrd’s rise: Of course, big happenings like these are not toggle switches. It’s a much messier transition. That’s how it can be that yesterday’s weirdos (hippies, freaks) are now today’s establishment ... How today’s ex-weird establishment can be struggling with the rise of a still-weirder youth cadre of psychosexual mutants beyond the old hippies’ imagination ... How the normies of today can be attacked as weird by today’s freakazoids ... And how the whole mess can produce such a fractured pantheon of pseudo-demigod figures whose titanic, cosmic conflict reveals identity politics to be a grand manifestation of the technological and theological character of experience in our strangely neo-medieval age. Who’s in control of your fate?