Shocker! The ideology that claims to support women doesn’t actually support women.  In an interview with “The View,” Leftist billionaire Mark Cuban admitted his feminism cuts off for women who refuse to vote his way.     “Donald Trump…you never see him around strong, intelligent women,” he mansplained to former Trump spokeswoman Alyssa Farah Griffin. Of course, ever since she threw her former boss under the bus to score a cozy talk show position, Griffin passes Cuban’s litmus test. In a desperate attempt to put toothpaste back in the tube, Cuban “clarified” in an X post that he was merely bashing Trump for finding smart women, “intimidating.” It sounds like he’s projecting. “I know many strong, intelligent women voting for Trump. Including in my extended family. I’m certainly not saying female voters are not smart, strong and intelligent,” Cuban insisted. Except that’s exactly what he suggested. His comments section isn’t forgiving him anytime soon for saying the quiet part out loud. Everyone knows he only believes women deserve a voice, as long as they voice opinions they’re told to.  

Pennsylvania Judge Angelo Foglietta handed Elon Musk and his America PAC a legal victory on Thursday.Foglietta decided not to immediately move forward with Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner's lawsuit against Musk and his PAC's $1 million sweepstakes.'Mr. Musk was named as a defendant as a publicity stunt. ... We all know that he is a very busy man who cannot just materialize anywhere he wants to with 12 hours' notice.'Instead, the judge placed the case on hold while a federal court considers whether it will move forward with the lawsuit or send it back to the state. Musk's legal team filed a "motion of removal" on Wednesday to move the case to federal court, arguing that the issues mentioned in Krasner's lawsuit "raise significant questions of federal law that are within the exclusive province" of the federal court."The Complaint, in truth, has little to do with state-law claims of nuisance and consumer protection," Musk's attorneys wrote. "Rather, although disguised as state law claims, the Complaint's focus is to prevent Defendants' purported 'interference' with the forthcoming Federal Presidential Election by any means."The decision allows Musk to continue the giveaway, which provides $1 million per day to random registered swing state voters who signed the America PAC's petition supporting the First and Second Amendments. The daily giveaway will continue through Election Day.To be eligible, voters must be from a battleground state: Pennsylvania, Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, or Wisconsin.Krasner accused Musk of "brazenly" continuing the daily lottery, claiming it is an "illegal lottery scheme to influence voters."Musk was ordered to attend the hearing on Wednesday but did not. As a result, Krasner is now pushing for sanctions against Musk for his failure to attend.Outside the courtroom, prosecutor John Summers stated that he is seeking to have the case returned to state court, claiming it "involves state law issues."He called Musk's failure to attend the recent hearing "both cowardly as well as irresponsible."Krasner's lawsuit also accused Musk and his PAC of failing to include clear rules for the sweepstakes and details on how they plan to use applicants' information. He also claimed that the winners are not chosen at random.Defense lawyer Matthew Haverstick accused the prosecution of naming Musk in the lawsuit to create a "circus atmosphere," stating that the PAC should have been the only defendant in the case."Mr. Musk was named as a defendant as a publicity stunt," Haverstick said. "We all know that he is a very busy man who cannot just materialize anywhere he wants to with 12 hours' notice."The Department of Justice previously warned the PAC that the lottery may violate federal laws but has taken no action against it.In response to the judge's decision to halt the case, Musk wrote on X, "American Justice FTW [for the win]."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

No American truly cares who a large historically leftist newspaper endorses, because for the most part, America is already well aware what their own and the media's beliefs are. However, there is a small subset of people who do care: namely, the employees at the Washington Post and the L.A. Times, who are furious that the outlets did not endorse Kamala Harris. “The only people who were waiting for this were the editorial writers who are so obsessed with their own point of view and so convinced that the world just hangs on their every word,” Blaze Media senior politics editor Christopher Bedford tells Jill Savage and Matthew Peterson of “Blaze News Tonight.” Now those employees are “quitting en masse.” “Which is really a wonderful thing to see, because the world definitely needs plenty of unemployed Washington Post and L.A. Times editorial writers who attack their bosses,” Bedford says. Bedford believes this “is a little foreshadowing” if Kamala Harris loses the election — despite all of the insane measures taken against Trump, including two assassination attempts, to keep him out. “If she loses this election,” he says, “this kind of turning on the publishers, turning on Bezos, turning on the owner of L.A. Times, turning on each other, is kind of a foreshadowing of the Democrat civil war that you’re going to see.” “These folks aren’t going to take it lying down,” he continues. “Their power has been decreasing every single day. The more they attack Donald Trump, the higher his popularity goes, but as opposed to looking outward or even inward and saying, ‘Where is his popularity coming from’ and ‘Where have we gone wrong,’ they’re kind of circling around a firing squad to turn on each other.” “I think that’s good news for everyone except them,” he adds. Want more from 'Blaze News Tonight'?To enjoy more provocative opinions, expert analysis, and breaking stories you won’t see anywhere else, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

BREAKING: Trump Sues CBS News for Gigantic Sum Over '60 Minutes' Fiasco

Renowned Liberal Author Naomi Wolf Endorses 'More Inclusive' Trump

The 'Warning Sign' in North Carolina That Is Giving Kamala Harris Nightmares

A 4,400-year-old settlement found by archaeologists in the Khaybar Oasis of northwestern Saudi Arabia has revealed some eye-opening truths about the pace of urbanization on the Arabian Peninsula during the Bronze Age. In comparison to developments taking place at the same time in Egypt, Mesopotamia, and the Levant, a new study shows that the progress of urbanization in this part of the world was slow, although far from completely non-existent. In an article just published in the journal PLOS One, an international team of researchers led by archaeologist Guillaume Charloux from the French research institute CNRS detail the results of their study of a small, fortified Bronze Age town known as al-Natah, which was discovered near the city of  Al-'Ula in Saudi Arabia’s Hejaz region. This is the first settlement of its type found in this area, and for the time it existed its small size can be considered somewhat unexpected. Arabian Peninsula Was a Hotbed of Hominin Cultures 400,000 Years Ago Mapping Mustatils, Saudi Arabia’s 7000-Year-Old Stone Monuments This settlement covered about 3.7 acres (1.5 hectares) of land, and featured a central public district and an adjacent residential district that were encircled by a system of protective ramparts. The peak population of al-Natah never surpassed 500, and it was apparently occupied between the years 2,400 and 1,500 BC. Read moreSection: NewsHistory & ArchaeologyAncient PlacesAsiaRead Later 

A transgender woman filed a lawsuit against a Hooters franchise in Colonie, New York, claiming the popular restaurant chain refused to hire her due to her appearance and gender identity.

Celebrations turned chaotic in Los Angeles after the Dodgers beat the New York Yankees in Game 5 of the World Series Wednesday night, with multiple arrests and incidents of looting and vandalism reported across the city, the New York Post reported.

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump sued CBS on Thursday over an interview of his Democratic rival Kamala Harris aired in early October that the lawsuit alleged was "doctored" and misleading, according to a court filing.The filing was made in the U.S. District...