Discussing SHTF Strategies & Scenarios

Kudzu: An Unlikely Survival Food

DIY Root Cellar In A Box

What to Do with a Financial Windfall

America Should Jail People for “Misinformation” and “Propaganda”

ABC News, Again: Rig a Debate? Who, Us?

This Makes Two Times Iran-Linked Assassins Have Been Ignored By Feds

NASA’s Curiosity spotted a close encounter between the moon and our planet.

I recently wrote that after Trump had spoken publicly about releasing the files on the JFK assassination, as well as more UFO files and videos, that he would be at risk of further assassination attempts. This risk was compounded after joining forces with JFK’s nephew Robert Kennedy Jr who as well wanting to wage war on the Deep State, via vested corporate and medical interests, has spoken in depth about how he wants the truth released to public about JFK’s death. Robert Kennedy Jr. firmly believes that the CIA were being both the deaths of JFK his Uncle and also his father Robert Kennedy. From my research I believe that there are details of a UFO cover up in the unreleased JFK files and that the reason for his and Robert Kennedy’s assassination was that they both thought that the American public deserved to know the truth that we are not alone. The recent attempt on Trump’s life at his Mar A Lago resort in Florida by a lone wolf suspect, Ryan Wesley Routh, is being seen in the mainstream media as an ex Trump supporter who has now turned his anger against the former President disillusioned at his record and behaviour. However, some are suggesting a possible CIA connection which is why Florida Governor Ron De Santis wants the investigation kept in Florida and not conducted by the FBI. If this seem far fetched then you have realise that the CIA has a long history of political interference both at home and abroad and some ever suggest that Robert Kennedy’s assassin – Sirhan Sirhan – was a CIA stooge subjected to Mind Control via the MK Ultra programme. Sirhan Sirhan was even a member of the secret society of The Rosicrucians. MK Ultra is not just fantasy and the product of Netflix’s imagination via hit show – Stranger Things – there are documents in the public domain that show that the CIA recruited and tested people for psychic abilities with the aim of using them as weapons. My friend Uri Geller, the mystical spoon-bender, has told me often that he was tested by the CIA via Mossad and was found to have special abilities that they could not explain. They wanted him to be a super spy soldier which he refused to be.  MK Ultra also developed a programme of mind control where subjects were subjected to extreme mental torture with the aim of breaking their will so they could be fed instructions to carry out killings and terrorist acts triggered by certain key words. So was Ryan Wesley Routh subject to mind control by the CIA – with instruction to take out Donald Trump in order to stop him revealing the truth about UFOs and the cover up? It’s a possibility which shouldn’t be ruled out. But why would they go to such great lengths to keep the truth about UFOs secret? I believe through my research that UFOs are not just nuts and bolts physical craft from other planet but that the truth is they are far weirder maybe from another dimension or reality which is alongside us on Earth and from a distant planet. Those in control of this secret, you can call them MJ 12 or The Collins Elite, know that the public could not handle this and that its release would herald the breakdown of society. This is why they will go to any lengths to keep it secret. I have written about this more extensively in my recent book God Versus Aliens and I highlight all the evidence that there is in the Bible and the ancient texts for this. Some in this Collins Elite group who are controlling the secret believe that these UFOs and aliens are actually demons and we should just leave them alone. Another reason why “they” will never release the truth. I have also made a film about it called Project Alien Earth now streaming on Amazon Prime. We should continue to press those in authority for the truth to be released. It is our planet and our lives we deserve the truth not matter how mind blowing it will be. The post Deep State Tries To Silence Trump Over UFO Disclosure appeared first on Anomalien.com.

Not even Sunday’s close call with a would-be assassin could interrupt the liberal TV networks’ barrage of bad press against Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump. A look at the first 72 hours of coverage on the ABC, CBS and NBC evening newscasts — Sunday, Monday and Tuesday nights — finds that while the attempted assassination dominated campaign coverage, these networks’ anti-Trump spin was nearly as bad as it could be: 95% negative, vs. just five percent positive. MRC analysts analyzed all 69 minutes of campaign coverage on the evening newscasts from September 15 through September 17. The attempted assassination was by far the dominant story:  48 minutes of airtime, or almost 70% of all campaign news. The networks aired more than 17 minutes of coverage on Sunday night, an additional 22 minutes on Monday and another eight minutes Tuesday evening. Yet even as they covered the shocking new danger to Trump, the networks persisted in bashing the GOP candidate on a range of other issues — as well as his reaction to his own close call. Over the three nights, we tallied 21 evaluative comments about the GOP candidate, 20 of which were negative, which computes to a 95% negative spin score. (For more, see the methodology explanation at the end of this article.) On Sunday, less than four hours after news of the shooting broke, NBC Nightly News anchor Lester Holt scolded Trump for his rhetoric: “Today’s apparent assassination attempt comes amid increasingly fierce rhetoric on the campaign trail itself. Mr. Trump [and] his running mate JD Vance continued to make baseless claims about Haitian immigrants in Ohio.” CBS Weekend News reporter Skyler Henry similarly linked Trump to the situation in Springfield, running a clip of Trump from the debate — “They’re eating the dogs” — before scolding: “The city has been thrust into the national conversation on immigration with unsubstantiated claims immigrants are eating pets.” Not to be left out, ABC’s Perry Russom on Sunday’s World News Tonight also blasted the Republican: “The baseless claim amplified by President Trump at the ABC News debate.” CBS’s Sunday night newscast also included a taped piece from correspondent Scott MacFarlane, which for no particular reason decided to look at the history of mail-in ballots. He included this gratuitous shot: “It [voting by mail] was the subject of baseless conspiracy theories and false claims of fraud by some critics, including former President Donald Trump and his supporters.” Those negative statements all aired within hours of Sunday’s dangerous security scare. On Monday’s CBS Evening News, anchor Norah O’Donnell decided to blast Trump yet again for the “cats and dogs” meme: “Donald Trump is blaming Democrats for inflaming political rhetoric, but the former President’s own words seem to be increasing the threat of political violence in Springfield Ohio. That’s where a false and ugly accusation against Haitians, thousands of whom are legal permanent residents, is impacting everyday life.” CBS’s Nikole Killion echoed her boss, ruing how “viral unfounded claims about Haitian immigrants stealing and eating pets continue to circulate, amplified by former President Trump and running mate Ohio Senator JD Vance.” She talked to a Haitian restaurant manager in Springfield, Roman Pierre. “He says Trump and Vance should apologize,” Killion relayed. On Tuesday, ABC’s World News Tonight caught up, with former debate moderator David Muir blasting the “false claims that have been spread by Donald Trump,” while correspondent Rachel Scott described Springfield as “a community on edge ever since former President Donald Trump amplified a false conspiracy theory....” NBC on Tuesday night also used Harris’s appearance before the National Association of Black Journalists to repeat criticism of Trump’s appearance back in July. Correspondent Gabe Gutierrez reminded viewers that the group “held a contentious session with former President Trump in July where he falsely questioned the Vice President’s racial identity.” These networks gave relatively little time to the accusation that these attempted shootings might have been influenced by Democratic rhetoric painting Trump as an existential threat. Out of 48 minutes of coverage of the attempted shooting, the three networks spent less than two minutes (1 minute, 53 seconds) on the possibility that Democrats could share the blame. All of the networks treated the charge as a cynical deflection. On NBC Monday night, reporter Garrett Haake rejected Trump’s argument: “Trump has also used incendiary language against Democrats, and authorities have not yet revealed a motive in either incident.” On Tuesday, CBS’s Caitlin Huey-Burns ran a clip of Vance blasting Democratic rhetoric before immediately countering: “Both Vance and Trump have a record of attacking their opponents.” If Sunday’s shooting is a sign that American political discourse has become too negative and too nasty, then the media coverage immediately following the event was its own cause for concern. It appears not even the second near-death experience of the former President is cause for even a brief cease-fire in the ongoing onslaught of negativity against Trump that marks TV’s 2024 campaign coverage. ++++ METHODOLOGY: To determine the spin of news coverage, our analysts tallied all explicitly evaluative statements about each candidate from either reporters, anchors or non-partisan sources such as experts or voters. Evaluations from partisan sources, as well as neutral statements, were not included. As we did in 2016 and 2020, we separated personal evaluations of each candidate from statements about their prospects in the campaign horse race (i.e., standings in the polls, chances to win, etc.). While such comments can have an effect on voters (creating a bandwagon effect for those seen as winning, or demoralizing the supports of those portrayed as losing), they are not “good press” or “bad press” as understood by media scholars as far back as Michael Robinson’s groundbreaking research on the 1980 presidential campaign.