YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #humor #loonylibs #charliekirk #illegalaliens #tpusa #bigfoot #socialists #deportthemall #blackamerica #commieleft #communityassociationmanagement #orlandofl #hoamanagement #condomanagement #propertymanagement
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Day mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
1 y

A Question of Timing
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

A Question of Timing

by Jeff Thomas, International Man: France, 1788.    Russia, 1916.    Germany, 1937. These dates have something in common. In France in 1788, political conditions had been getting questionable, but there was no apparent need to panic. That came the following year, with the sudden outbreak of the French Revolution. From that point on, it was dangerous […]
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
1 y

Bill Gates “Apeel” notice hidden underneath a removable organic sticker
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

Bill Gates “Apeel” notice hidden underneath a removable organic sticker

from Jim Crenshaw:  TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
Like
Comment
Share
Pet Life
Pet Life
1 y ·Youtube Pets & Animals

YouTube
Woman Stops While Driving Home As She Spots Two Stray Puppies | The Dodo
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y ·Youtube Politics

YouTube
REACTIONS: Should Illegal Immigrants Get Free Healthcare?
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y ·Youtube Politics

YouTube
Israel at War: 1973 | 5 Minute Video
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y ·Youtube Politics

YouTube
Israel at War: 1967 | 5 Minute Videos
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y

Why It’s Time for Family-First Conservatism
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

Why It’s Time for Family-First Conservatism

This is a lightly edited version of remarks delivered July 25 in Washington by Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts at the Social Conservative Policy Conference, dubbed So-Con-Con and organized by the Family Policy Alliance Foundation. Before I begin, I want to commend the Family Policy Alliance Foundation for putting on another tremendous conference this week. The Heritage Foundation once again was proud to be a key partner with your CEO Craig DeRoche, a longtime friend of mine, and his wonderful team. Thank you all for being here and making So-Con-Con possible. This conference has become an invaluable resource for social conservatives to communicate, and for policymakers to be reminded of, the values that made America great … and can do so again. The question is: How? How do we translate So-Con values into So-Con policy? As a social conservative, speaking to a room full of social conservatives, what I am about to suggest might sound counterintuitive. But perhaps our first step should be to stop thinking of ourselves as social conservatives at all. From Party of Families to Party FOR Families Inside the Beltway, and especially in the Republican establishment, the adjective “social” in front of “conservative” is a diminutive. It is meant to distinguish us from the quote-unquote “real” conservatives who call the shots on the elite Right—the corporations, Wall Street and K Street, and the national security establishment. Here in Washington, social conservatives always have been seen only as an interest group to manage, not a core constituency to serve. Even if this weren’t insulting, it would still be absurd. Because let’s face it: For several decades now, the Republican Party has owed its every substantive victory to one group above all others: families, and in particular, parents. Married mothers and fathers. Parents with younger and older kids. Across every demographic group. And up and down the income scale. The data confirms what we all know. Raising children in a culture besieged by anti-family elite institutions moves Americans to the Right. Everyone in this room already knows that it’s parents who create our families, our communities, and our nation. What we have to remember—and remind elites—is that it’s parents who create Republican political majorities, too. So in a sense, the “how” social conservatives face is simple. We need to turn a political party of moms, dads, and kids into a party for moms, dads, and kids. And the way to do that is to recognize and insist that in this movement and in this moment, every issue must be understood first as a family issue—one that is centered around the dinner table, not the basement. Failure of Hyphenated Conservatism The essence of conservativism is the preservation of those institutions that support—as political philosopher Russell Kirk would tell us—the permanent things. Chief among them is the institution God established in the beginning, the one that reflects his own essence—the family. To be conservative, you must be a social conservative who puts family first. No longer should we accept the premise that we are junior partnersin someone else’s political coalition. No longer should we submit to the false hierarchy promoted by Republican elites. No longer should we subcontract economic policy to materialistic libertarians. Or subcontract regulatory policy to corporate lobbyists, immigration policy to globalist ideologues, fiscal policy to party insiders, or foreign policy to the military industrial complex. No longer should social conservatives accept the occasional abortion “show vote” as a reward for being team players on a team whose coaches and captains look down on us. Except for President Donald Trump, who promised and delivered on reversing Roe v. Wade, those coaches and captains have done nothing over the last generation to merit our deference. And with Trump’s great selection of Sen. JD Vance of Ohio, I remain confident the next presidential administration will continue to champion socially conservative causes. The division, dysfunction, and decline we see all around us—led at every step by the breakdown of our families—did not just happen. Some Republican leaders helped make it happen. We are living in the nation their political myopia built. They were the ones who subordinated blue-collar communities and social solidarity to trade with China. They were the ones who insisted that repeated, unauthorized, and unclear military interventions would make our nation safer and stronger. They were the ones who scolded us that illegal immigration was good and big government could somehow be compassionate. They were the ones who said Donald Trump could never win … and would never keep his promises on life, gender ideology, and religious liberty. I think it’s time for social conservatives to start trusting our instincts, and to stop following supposed “leaders” who spent the past three decades fighting us and failing our nation. Stakes: The Next Fight For too long, conservatives allowed Republican leaders to put first things second. They focused on taxes, regulations, free trade, and far-away wars, leaving our moms, dads, kids, and culture defenseless against the elite barbarians already inside our gates. They forgot that the purpose of government policy isn’t economic growth or security or progress. It’s human flourishing. And as you know, happiness and flourishing ultimately depend on the health and strength of our families. The Left certainly understands this. Leftists know that to fundamentally change America—that is, to destroy it—they first have to destroy the American family. Have you noticed in recent years how “progressive” Democrats never talk about taxes, health care, and welfare like they used to? What is their agenda now?                        Indoctrinating children. Piercing parental authority. Slandering biblical religions. Punishing and discouraging marriage. Censoring conservative and patriotic speech. Condemning the Constitution, especially the First Amendment. They understand the stakes. They understand the fight. That’s why the Left—not the Right—turned families into the battlefield of American politics, starting with America’s cultural institutions: colleges, schools, churches, civic groups, and entertainment. And it’s why social conservatives and all conservatives must join the battle on that field to defend the moms, dads, and kids now fighting for their very way of life. Our national survival depends on America’s families. And America’s families are depending on us. Substance: Of, by, and for the Family This is what I mean when I say that going forward, we need to see every issue as a family issue. It’s also why Heritage has worked so hard with our partners across the conservative movement to develop a menu of policies and train potential future personnel to help the next conservative presidential administration put families first. This is why the anti-family Left is furious we would do such a thing. A united, pro-family, pro-American conservative agenda should scare them to death. Think of what we could do if conservatives reformed taxes, regulations, and trade policy not merely to boost corporate profits, as good as that is, but to make it easy for young couples to get married, buy a home, and have and raise kids. Lots of kids. What if we stripped marriage penalties from all federal programs and instead rewarded parents for staying married and having more children? What if we thought outside the box and started treating young couples as the start-up entrepreneurs they are? What if we gave family formation the same attention and care that Washington has always given to capital formation? What if we treated stay-at-home moms like the invaluable, full-time workers we all know they are? Think of the revolutions in education, day care, health care, technology policy, criminal justice, infrastructure, even foreign policy … if Washington finally represented families instead of corporate interest groups. Think of how quickly that revolution would spread if our current generation of conservative governors were given the freedom to experiment with different approaches based on the needs and values of their communities. Family-first conservatism can offer a new perspective to every issue under the sun. And, I submit, it could finally solve problems as diverse as porn addiction, mental health, and climate change—problems that anti-family elites only exacerbated. Conclusion: Think Bigger The bottom line is that social conservatives need to think bigger. We need to stop thinking of ourselves as part of a movement, or partners in a coalition, but as the leaders of a nation. The Republican establishment has failed. Elite insider-ism has failed. The Left is filling that vacuum with anti-family, anti-American poison. And if we don’t fight back, they will win. We cannot let that happen. The fight for our nation is ultimately a fight for our families. It’s a fight only conservatives can win, but only if we step up and lead. And as we do so, may we be motivated by the wisdom of the apostle Paul, who in Romans exhorted believers: “Do not conform yourselves to this age but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and pleasing and perfect.” The post Why It’s Time for Family-First Conservatism appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y ·Youtube Politics

YouTube
There might be a giant war in the Middle East
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Satire
Conservative Satire
1 y Funny Stuff

rumbleOdysee
Sky News ABRUPTLY cuts LIVE feed as MOB of migrants surround reporter covering "FAR-RIGHT" riots
Like
Comment
Share
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
1 y

Federal Judge Rules “Google Is A Monopolist”
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

Federal Judge Rules “Google Is A Monopolist”

A federal judge ruled Monday that Google ‘has exercised monopoly power’ and violated antitrust law. “After a lengthy anti-trust trial, a federal judge has ruled that Google has an illegal monopoly in both search and advertising,” Sean Davis, CEO of The Federalist, commented. BREAKING: After a lengthy anti-trust trial, a federal judge has ruled that Google has an illegal monopoly in both search and advertising. https://t.co/pDuHRVx8nA pic.twitter.com/XRZUPjDsKU — Sean Davis (@seanmdav) August 5, 2024 “The ruling, made by the District of Columbia’s Judge Amit Mehta, sided with the US Justice Department and a group of states in a set of cases alleging the tech giant abused its dominance in online search,” Yahoo Finance reports. “After having carefully considered and weighed the witness testimony and evidence, the court reaches the following conclusion: Google is a monopolist, and it has acted as one to maintain its monopoly. It has violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act,” Mehta wrote. “Specifically, the court holds that (1) there are relevant product markets for general search services and general search text ads; (2) Google has monopoly power in those markets,” the ruling noted. “Importantly, the court also finds that Google has exercised its monopoly power by charging supracompetitive prices for general search text ads. That conduct has allowed Google to earn monopoly profits,” it added. "'T]he court reaches the following conclusion: Google is a monopolist, and it has acted as one to maintain its monopoly. It has violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act." BREAKING. A federal judge has *FINALLY* ruled Google has an ILLEGAL monopoly on both search and advertising pic.twitter.com/yz2oOpcDm4 — Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) August 5, 2024 Yahoo Finance reports: The findings, if upheld, could outlaw contracts that for years all but assured Google’s dominance. Google said it planned to appeal the decision, which it said “recognizes that Google offers the best search engine, but concludes that we shouldn’t be allowed to make it easily available.” Judge Mehta ruled that Google violated antitrust law in the markets for “general search” and “general search text” ads, which are the ads that appear at the top of the search results page. He said Google was not liable in the market for “search advertising” because it did not hold a monopoly there. The decision is a huge win for the Justice Department and could have giant implications for some of the other big names in the tech world. That’s because Apple (AAPL), Amazon (AMZN), and Meta (META) are defending themselves against a series of other federal- and state-led antitrust suits, some of which make similar claims. HUGE: A federal court judge rules — in a case brought by the Trump DOJ and continued by the Biden DOJ — that Google is an illegal monopoly and violated anti-trust laws by abusing their search monopoly by forcing consumers to use its search engine. Remedies to be decided next. — Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) August 5, 2024 Breaking News: Google acted illegally to maintain a monopoly in online search, a federal judge ruled on Monday, a decision that strikes at the power of big tech companies and that may fundamentally alter the way they do business. https://t.co/jITvbqa70p — The New York Times (@nytimes) August 5, 2024 From The Verge: It’s not yet clear what this ruling will mean for the future of Google’s business, as this initial finding is only about the company’s liability, not about remedies. Google’s fate will be determined in the next phase of proceedings, which could result in anything from a mandate to stop certain business practices to a breakup of Google’s search business. Google plans to appeal the ruling, president of global affairs Kent Walker said in a statement. “This decision recognizes that Google offers the best search engine, but concludes that we shouldn’t be allowed to make it easily available,” he said. “As this process continues, we will remain focused on making products that people find helpful and easy to use.” “This landmark decision holds Google accountable,” DOJ antitrust chief Jonathan Kanter said in a statement. “It paves the path for innovation for generations to come and protects access to information for all Americans.” DuckDuckGo, whose CEO testified against Google in the trial, applauded the decision, but recognized the fight isn’t over. In a statement, SVP for public affairs Kamyl Bazbaz said, “The journey ahead will be long. As we are seeing in the EU and other places, Google will do anything it can to avoid changing its conduct. However, we know there is a pent up demand for alternatives in search and this ruling will support access to more options.” Read the full 286-page ruling HERE.
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 60036 out of 96927
  • 60032
  • 60033
  • 60034
  • 60035
  • 60036
  • 60037
  • 60038
  • 60039
  • 60040
  • 60041
  • 60042
  • 60043
  • 60044
  • 60045
  • 60046
  • 60047
  • 60048
  • 60049
  • 60050
  • 60051
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund