YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #humor #loonylibs #charliekirk #illegalaliens #tpusa #bigfoot #socialists #deportthemall #blackamerica #commieleft #buy #sell #lyinglibs #shemales #trannies
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Day mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Jihad & Terror Watch
Jihad & Terror Watch
1 y

‘MICHIGANISTAN’ Far left Democrats say Muslims used voter fraud to secure power in Hamtramck, America’s first Muslim majority city
Favicon 
barenakedislam.com

‘MICHIGANISTAN’ Far left Democrats say Muslims used voter fraud to secure power in Hamtramck, America’s first Muslim majority city

“Hoisted by their own petard?” Democrats in Hamtramck Michigan are having buyer’s remorse now that their once celebrated all-Muslim City Council is wielding power in controversial ways. Local left-wingers, who enjoyed the Detroit enclave as a stronghold of progressive values and tolerance, are quickly learning that their new Muslim Democrat leaders have different plans for […]
Like
Comment
Share
Jihad & Terror Watch
Jihad & Terror Watch
1 y

Illegal alien Muslim invaders from Jordan who ‘tried to breach’ Quantico Marine Corps base allowed to walk free after posting bail
Favicon 
barenakedislam.com

Illegal alien Muslim invaders from Jordan who ‘tried to breach’ Quantico Marine Corps base allowed to walk free after posting bail

The two illegal alien Muslim invaders (potential terrorists) who are charged with trying to breach Marine Corps Base Quantico in May posted thousands of dollars in bail and were allowed to leave federal custody. NY Post Hasan Yousef Hamdan, 32, and Mohammad Khair Dabous, 28, were released from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention despite […]
Like
Comment
Share
Front Page Mag Feed
Front Page Mag Feed
1 y

“It Will Be Up To Us On Jan 6, 2025, To Tell the Rampaging Trump Mobs That He’s Disqualified”
Favicon 
www.frontpagemag.com

“It Will Be Up To Us On Jan 6, 2025, To Tell the Rampaging Trump Mobs That He’s Disqualified”

"Cvil war conditions." The post “It Will Be Up To Us On Jan 6, 2025, To Tell the Rampaging Trump Mobs That He’s Disqualified” appeared first on Frontpage Mag.
Like
Comment
Share
Independent Sentinel News Feed
Independent Sentinel News Feed
1 y

Kamala of Kamalot Clips for Monday
Favicon 
www.independentsentinel.com

Kamala of Kamalot Clips for Monday

The economy is collapsing, another major war is about to break out in the Middle East, and illegal aliens on the terror watch list have crossed our southern border. Other than that, Kamala Harris has done a great job. Kamala hasn’t given a presser, and she won’t answer questions. If she did, no one would […] The post Kamala of Kamalot Clips for Monday appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Wire Feed
Daily Wire Feed
1 y

Supreme Court Spurns Bid To Block Trump Sentencing And Gag Order In Hush-Money Case
Favicon 
www.dailywire.com

Supreme Court Spurns Bid To Block Trump Sentencing And Gag Order In Hush-Money Case

The Supreme Court rejected on Monday an effort to freeze sentencing and a gag order in Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s hush-money case against Donald Trump until after the November election in which the former president is seeking another term in the White House. Missouri‘s GOP attorney general, Andrew Bailey, petitioned the high court in July, raising concerns about his constituents not being able to participate in a contest “free from New York’s exercise of coercive power limiting the ability of Trump to campaign.” New York fought back. The Supreme Court said Missouri’s bill of complaint was “denied” and its motion for preliminary relief or a stay was “dismissed as moot.” Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito “would grant the motion for leave to file the bill of complaint but would not grant other relief,” the order added. “It’s disappointing that the Supreme Court refused to exercise its constitutional responsibility to resolve state v. state disputes,” Bailey said on X. He added he would “continue to prosecute our lawsuit” against the Justice Department for alleged coordination of “illicit prosecutions” against Trump. In late May, a jury convicted Trump of falsifying business records to allegedly cover up a tryst with adult film star Stormy Daniels for a “catch-and-kill” scheme to influence the 2016 presidential election. Trump denied the affair and had pleaded not guilty to the charges. Judge Juan Merchan initially picked a July 11 date for sentencing, but approved a delay until at least mid-September while he considers whether an immunity ruling by the Supreme Court could have a bearing on the case. A decision is reportedly expected on September 6. WATCH THE TRAILER FOR ‘AM I RACIST?’ — A MATT WALSH COMEDY ON DEI Meanwhile, Trump has appealed a gag order in the case. Merchan did remove limits on what Trump could say about trial witnesses and the jury after the verdict in late May, but kept restraints on comments about court staff, Bragg’s staff, and family members of court staff and prosecutors. A panel of the mid-level state Appellate Division disagreed with Trump’s contention that the conclusion of the trial resulted in a “change in circumstances” warranting an end to the entire gag order and denied the appeal. Bragg’s team made submissions that demonstrated “threats received by District Attorney staff after the jury verdict continued to pose a significant and imminent threat,” the appeals court decision last Thursday noted. Despite multiple setbacks, a spokesperson for Trump’s 2024 campaign said the former president “continues to forcefully challenge” the “decision to leave in place portions of the unconstitutional Gag Order,” according to a statement reported by ABC News.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Wire Feed
Daily Wire Feed
1 y

The Kamala Harris Stock Market Crash 
Favicon 
www.dailywire.com

The Kamala Harris Stock Market Crash 

There will come a point when Kamala Harris has to answer a serious question.  Democrats are hoping that doesn’t happen until after the election. After all, there are only 98 days until the election and early voting begins in roughly one month. In September, early voting will begin in some of the swing states like Pennsylvania. And today is August 5. All Harris has to do is avoid serious questions for the next couple of weeks, and then she will be at the Democratic National Convention. She will hit a bump coming out of that.  So the Harris honeymoon will likely continue for another solid three weeks or more.  We are now at 16 days and counting since Kamala Harris became the presumptive Democratic nominee. She has not been asked one question over two weeks. Zero questions.  The press acts as the Praetorian Guard for Kamala Harris. Donald Trump should be saying he wants to debate her every week from now until the election because no one else is going to ask her a tough question.  She’s being completely dishonest about the debate challenge. Trump accepted a debate under certain circumstances with Biden, and then they slotted in Harris. Why won’t he keep that same debate calendar? Because she’s a different human. Does she have to debate JD Vance now since she had agreed to a vice presidential debate with JD Vance when Biden was the actual nominee?  The American people know Donald Trump. The American people do not know Kamala Harris. The vast majority of Americans have no idea who is the sitting vice president of the United States right now. They have no idea what Harris even does for a living. WATCH: The Ben Shapiro Show She should be forced to answer questions since her administration is sitting at the top of American governance. It’s amazing that until now, it was always the Biden-Harris administration, even while Biden was attempting to shuttle her off somewhere so that she didn’t have any part in governance. She kept glomming onto him and claiming that she was part of all the decision-making. Fine. If she was and still is part of the decision-making, why doesn’t she have to answer for the fact that we’re in the middle of a massive stock market sell-off? According to the Wall Street Journal:  A stock-market selloff intensified around the world, sending U.S. indexes sliding and volatility spiking to its highest levels since the Covid-19 pandemic.  In early trading, the Nasdaq Composite fell more than 5%, while the S&P 500 fell about 4% and the Dow was around 3% lower.  Painful turbulence started in Japan early Monday, with the Nikkei 225 falling more than 12%, its worst one-day drop since the crash after Black Monday in 1987. Losses then cascaded across South Korea, Europe and the U.S., as investors dumped riskier assets and flocked to safety. The declines extended what has been a dizzying few days on Wall Street during which this year’s most popular trades have been aggressively unwound. A selloff in tech shares continued Monday, with Nvidia, Meta and Apple each losing 9% or more. (The iPhone maker took an extra hit from news that Berkshire Hathaway had slashed its Apple stake.)  Why is all of this happening? Because people are beginning to realize that as the job market is coming in really, really soft, we may be entering a recession. When inflation rates are jacked up to 10% or 12%, even with jacking them back down all the way to 2.5%, all the loose money is siphoned off in that process, which leads to less investment and to job losses, which is what is about to begin happening. The Wall Street Journal continues in their report, writing: Concerns about a slowing U.S. economy are front and center for investors after job growth slowed sharply in July. Investors are worried that the Federal Reserve has moved too slowly and will need to play catch up in cutting rates. One of the things that’s so amazing about how our global economy works at this point is how much of it is run by the central banks. Your job should not be reliant on whether Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell is good at his. Your job should not be reliant on whether central bankers in London are good at predicting the future and determining exactly what the inflation rate should be. This is why the very idea of a Federal Reserve in the United States that jacked up and down the supply of money in order to manipulate job markets is ridiculous. What you really want is a perfectly predictable regime in monetary and fiscal terms so that you can make good decisions about whether or not to invest or not invest. That’s not the way this works anymore. Now, we’re all reading tea leaves. Now, we’ve all been sitting around wondering what Jerome Powell was going to do. Maybe he was too late on the gas or maybe he was too late on the brake. That is not the way a healthy global economy should run. That is the way things are running, however, and a lot of that has been brought about, of course, by the massive spending Harris voted for. Remember, the Inflation Reduction Act was a 50-50 vote in the Senate — and she was the deciding vote. Does she get to take credit for that? It seems to me that if she gets to take credit for all of the supposed Biden administration accomplishments, when the stock market starts to tank, she gets to take credit for that one as well. Warren Buffett is looking at the markets and saying, “I don’t like what I’m seeing here.” The Wall Street Journal’s “Stock Market Today” writes: Shares of the iPhone maker dropped more than 6% Monday after Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway disclosed over the weekend that it had sold nearly half of its Apple stock in the second quarter. Buffett’s reputation as one of the all-time greatest stock pickers means his decisions can significantly sway the market. But Apple is also facing pressure from an aggressive rotation out of technology stocks. In addition to Apple, shares of Nvidia, Tesla and Alphabet also fell sharply as investors unloaded riskier assets. Meanwhile, Wall Street’s fear gauge has been soaring. CNBC reported:  The Cboe Volatility Index, or VIX, briefly broke above 65 on Monday morning, up from about 23 on Friday and roughly 17 a week ago. It had cooled to about 32 shortly after noon ET. The Monday morning peak was the highest level the VIX has hit since March 2020, shortly after the Federal Reserve’s emergency actions during the Covid-19 pandemic, according to FactSet. The VIX rose as high as 85.47 in March 2020, according to FactSet. The VIX is calculated based on market pricing for options on the S&P 500. It is designed to be a measure of expected volatility over the next 30 days, and is often referred to as Wall Street’s “fear gauge.” Even after the COVID lockdowns were over, Biden just kept spending oodles and oodles of money, keeping the money loose. Signs of lower consumer spending are cropping up. And there’s the inverted yield curve where longer dated bonds have a lower yield than the short-term Fed funds rate, which usually signals recession. Where is Kamala Harris in all this? Given the supreme importance of the economy to voters, this could turn a neck-and-neck race between Trump and Harris to one strongly in favor of Trump. * * * WATCH THE TRAILER FOR ‘AM I RACIST?’ — A MATT WALSH COMEDY ON DEI
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Wire Feed
Daily Wire Feed
1 y

Several U.S. Personnel Injured In Iranian-Backed Terror Attack On Base In Iraq: Report
Favicon 
www.dailywire.com

Several U.S. Personnel Injured In Iranian-Backed Terror Attack On Base In Iraq: Report

Several U.S. personnel were injured in an attack on Al-Asad airbase in Iraq late on Monday that was reportedly carried out by an Iranian-backed terrorist group. “We can confirm that there was a suspected rocket attack today against U.S. and Coalition forces at Al Asad Airbase, Iraq,” U.S. officials said in a statement. “Initial indications are that several U.S. personnel were injured. Base personnel are conducting a post-attack damage assessment.” The official said that more updates will follow as new information becomes available. The attack was reportedly carried out by one of Iran’s terrorist proxy groups, the same terror groups that have launched more than 170 attacks against U.S. forces in the region following Hamas’ October 7 terrorist attack on Israel. WATCH THE TRAILER FOR ‘AM I RACIST?’ — A MATT WALSH COMEDY ON DEI Charles Lister, director of the Syria program of the Washington-based Middle East Institute think tank, wrote on X: “Today’s rocket attack on Ain al-Asad was the 219th attack by Iran’s proxies on U.S. forces in Syria & Iraq since Oct 2023.” He added that 6 attacks have happened in the last three weeks. There were also reports that media linked to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Crops (IRGC) said that the attack was carried out by one of their proxies. NEWS Ain al-Asad air base in Iraq, where US troops are stationed, has faced an attack from a proxy of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Per IRGC media — Yashar Ali ? (@yashar) August 5, 2024 This is a breaking news story; refresh the page for updates.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Wire Feed
Daily Wire Feed
1 y

Kamala Harris Still Hasn’t Done A Major Interview 15 Days After Biden Dropped Out
Favicon 
www.dailywire.com

Kamala Harris Still Hasn’t Done A Major Interview 15 Days After Biden Dropped Out

It’s been two weeks and one day since President Joe Biden abandoned his reelection campaign and bumped his running mate to the top of the ticket. In that time, Vice President Kamala Harris has not sat down with the press for a single long-form interview, and no upcoming ones have been announced. It’s difficult to imagine the major news networks have not reached out to the Harris campaign for a long interview at this point. Not only is she the presumptive nominee of one of the country’s two major political parties, but the news cycles of the last month have involved one historical event after another — surly worthy of comment. Even Biden, who has been notoriously reluctant to do press conferences during his presidency, sat down with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos in early July, shortly before he dropped out of the race. However, on Monday, Biden ignored shouted questions about the stock market and the volatile situation in the Middle East as he made his way from Marine One to a meeting with his national security team, according to the pool report. Previously, Harris’ long-form interviews have not always gone the way her communications team hoped. In an infamous moment from a 2021 interview with NBC’s Lester Holt, Harris stumbled when the anchor asked her whether she had any plans to visit the porous southern border. WATCH THE TRAILER FOR ‘AM I RACIST?’ — A MATT WALSH COMEDY ON DEI “You haven’t been to the border,” Holt noted during the June 2021 interview just five months after Biden took office. “And I haven’t been to Europe,” Harris responded, laughing. “I mean I don’t understand the point that you’re making.” Last week, the media backtracked on calling Harris the “border czar,” a title they had given her back in 2021 when she was tasked with finding a solution to surging illegal immigration. Immigration is among the Biden administration’s most vulnerable issues, and so far, Harris’ team has not appeared eager to thrust her in front of a camera to face questions again about her handling of the border crisis. Harris is also known for her vague word salads, another reason her communications team may not want her doing interviews right now during her brand new presidential campaign’s honeymoon phase with the public. “It is time for us to do what we have been doing, and that time is every day. Every day it is time for us to agree that there are things and tools that are available to us to slow this thing down,” she said during a 2022 interview with NBC. Since Harris announced her intention to “earn” the Democratic nomination, her campaign has seen little negative coverage from legacy media outlets, and her candidacy has even sparked a string of positive memes and trends among younger voters. Election Day is only 91 days away. It remains to be seen whether Harris could potentially avoid a single real interview until then.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Wire Feed
Daily Wire Feed
1 y

‘Gentle Parenting’ Is A Great Way To Turn Your Child Into An Obnoxious, Insufferable Brat
Favicon 
www.dailywire.com

‘Gentle Parenting’ Is A Great Way To Turn Your Child Into An Obnoxious, Insufferable Brat

It’s difficult to be a good parent in our culture today. The forces pulling your child away from you — the corrupting influences that seek to degrade him and destroy his soul — are more numerous and more powerful and more ubiquitous and unavoidable, and have more immediate access to him, than at any other point in human history. This is why it is so easy to fail at parenting, but also why it is so crucial that we don’t. For that reason I’m always troubled when some confused, fatally stupid and inept parenting method arises. Every few years a fancy new parenting trend seems to crop up. They always have different names and present themselves as different strategies, but they are basically the same bad ideas repackaged and resold over and over again. You’ll notice that up until the latter half of the last century, there were no parenting trends or parenting methods. You didn’t have different types of parenting. There was only parenting. If you’d asked your great grandfather what parenting strategy he preferred — if you asked him if he was a “conscious parent” or a “helicopter parent” or a “positive parent” or whatever — he would have looked at you confused, not understanding the question. Or else he would have shown you his belt.  In recent decades, thanks in large part to the psychiatric industry, parenting has become much more complicated than it needs to be, with too many competing strategies — all of them seemingly designed to make your child into a dysfunctional, needy, entitled little hellion. And in that way, they’ve been extremely successful.  Which brings us to a parenting trend that has gotten a lot of attention lately. It’s called “gentle parenting.” If you have ever ventured into the world of TikTok and Instagram parents, you are familiar with this term. It’s a style of parenting gaining popularity especially in my generation. A recent survey of millennial parents conducted by Lurie Children’s Hospital in Chicago found that a staggering 75 percent use the gentle parenting technique. So what is gentle parenting? The website parents.com has an explainer on the subject:  Gentle parenting is a peaceful, positive style of parenting that is very different from that of previous generations of parents. It is but one of many styles of parenting out there. From authoritative and permissive to free-range and conscious parenting, there are seemingly more variations than a burnt-out parent can count. But if you’re looking to add a new approach to your arsenal, you may want to consider gentle parenting. Before parents.com tells us exactly what this approach consists of, we should make note of one thing. We’re told that gentle parenting is “very different from that of previous generations of parens.” That’s true. And also the whole problem. I’m not saying that we should parent exactly as our own parents and grandparents did. I’m not saying that previous generations of parents didn’t make mistakes. But previous generations of parents did parent the people who built human civilization. They parented the pioneers and poets and philosophers and artists and inventors and warriors and leaders who accomplished incomprehensible feats of heroism and genius, and who gave us every good and wonderful and beautiful thing we have in our lives. Old fashioned parenting has a track record. It’s the parenting that took us from mud huts to the moon. What has modern parenting produced? Does it have a similar record of success? Or has it instead produced multiple generations of depressed, lazy, overgrown brats stuck in a perpetual state of emotional and mental adolescence? I’ll let you answer that question for yourself. WATCH: The Matt Walsh Show The point is: we should be immediately suspicious of a “very different” style of parenting. Why is it very different? Was old fashioned parenting broken? If not, why are we fixing it?  Continuing: Gentle parenting is a means of parenting without shame, blame, or punishment. It is centered on partnership as both parents and children have a say in this collaborative style…. “Gentle parenting, also known as collaborative parenting, is a style of parenting where parents do not compel children to behave by means of punishment or control, but rather use connection, communication, and other democratic methods to make decisions together as a family,” says Danielle Sullivan, a parenting coach… “Gentle parenting teaches children that they can be active in the world, set their own boundaries, trust their own needs, and make their voices heard. Now there is a lot wrong with what I just read. Using “democratic methods” in your home is a recipe for dysfunction and chaos. As the father and head of my household, I am not presiding over a democracy. I was not elected to my position. Even if my children voted to throw me out of office, I would remain in power. Our system of government in the United States, in theory anyway, depends on the consent of the governed. My home does not. If your home does, that certainly means — without exception — that you have failed as a parent and your children are the kinds of horrible, out of control, miniature terrorists who nobody wants to be around, and who, without miraculous intervention, will grow into maladapted, miserable adults.  To explain why, it may be helpful to take a look at some examples of gentle parenting in action. In fact this article provides one:  If you’re looking for a way to incorporate gentle parenting into your life, your best bet is to start small… Model what you want to see on a regular basis. Practice kindness, compassion, and empathy at all times. And try to be less demanding and commanding. Instead of saying “tie your shoes,” make it a suggestion. Something like “Do you think you should tie your shoes so you don’t trip? The first few sentences of this paragraph start out fine, but then we’re told that you should be “less demanding and commanding.” This is only half right. Less demanding, sure. But you should be commanding. Demands are weak. Demands are made by people who are not in control but want to be. Kidnappers and bank robbers make demands. Demands are desperate and weak. It means that you are not in control of yourself or your surroundings. To demand respect is to pathetically and impotently request it. It is to shout “respect me!” because nobody does. But to command respect is to be regarded with esteem, admiration, and obedience without asking for it. If you have to demand respect from your children, it means that you are not commanding respect. So you should be less demanding because you are more commanding. But to be neither demanding nor commanding is to be a figure with no authority or respect at all.  So instead of telling your child, “tie your shoes,” you’re encouraged to say, “Do you think you should tie your shoes so you don’t trip?” This is all wrong. A strong leader knows what things must be done and gives clear, concise, and confident instructions accordingly. Tying shoes is a thing that must be done. It doesn’t matter if your child thinks he should tie his shoes. You don’t need to build a consensus on the matter. You don’t need to put a referendum up for a vote to democratically establish the necessity of tying shoes. And what if he says that, no, he doesn’t think he should? What then? Will you respect him as an equal and let him fall down the steps and break his neck? Or will you tell him to tie them anyway? If the latter — and I hope it’s the latter — what was the point of asking the question in the first place?  Your child is a child. He has no idea what he’s doing, what he should be doing, or what’s going on. He needs to know that you know. He needs to know that you are confident and secure in your position as the leader. Here’s a parenting secret for you: a child wants to be told what to do. He doesn’t want open ended questions and limitless options. He wants direction. He may not know that he wants it. He may say that he doesn’t want it. But that’s because he doesn’t understand his own wants, much less his needs. If you give instructions — not requests, instructions — and you do it clearly and firmly, he will be a happier kid. He will feel safer, more loved, and will end up a better person in the long run. This is the major problem with the “gentle parenting” method. It relies heavily on “partnering” with children who don’t know what’s best for them and are relying on you to know instead. You should not be looking to make your child a partner in his own parenting, any more than you’d want the captain of your plane to invite you to be a co-pilot. Your captain’s commitment to democratic equality may flatter you for a moment, but it also makes it much more likely that you’ll die a fiery death. If you go over to TikTok, as mentioned, you’ll find many examples of influencers promoting gentle parenting, and they all run into the same problem. Here’s one popular gentle parenting video from a guy with 12 million followers on the platform: Now, it will not surprise you to learn that the comments — and there are hundreds of them — are all from people applauding this strategy and saying that they wish this guy was their own dad. That’s because most of the comments are likely from teenagers who, for obvious reasons, would love to have a dad who only grounds them if they agree that it’s fair, and who will still let them go to parties even when they’re grounded. Which is like the court sentencing you to house arrest, but then telling you that your house, for these purposes, includes anywhere on the Earth. Of course, in real life, if you tell your teenage daughter that she’s grounded and then ask her if it’s fair, in a million cases out of a million, she will say “no.” What then? Will you respect her opinion and validate her perspective by throwing out the punishment? If so, what was the point of the whole exercise, other than making you look emasculated and weak? And if you will stick with the punishment even though she says it’s unfair, what was the point of asking her whether it’s fair or not? This is what gentle parenting is all about. It’s designed to make parents look indecisive and pathetic in the eyes of their children. Here’s another example: Dear God. That video has 360 thousand likes by the way. Let me see if I have this right. Your daughter slammed the freezer door, lectured you, and instructed you not to eat food without her permission, and you stood there, tail between your legs like a scolded puppy and just took it? You allowed yourself to be chastised and reprimanded by your own daughter? You permitted her to rebuke you for eating your food that you purchased? This is disordered in the extreme. What you and your husband should be communicating is that the ice cream is your ice cream. It is your fridge. Your kitchen. Your house. You don’t have to ask her for permission to do anything. She should be grateful that she has a roof over her head, a room to sleep in, and food to eat. You’re so generous that you even buy her ice cream sometimes. The only attitude you should accept from her is gratitude for the things you give her and the life your provide for her. And if she speaks to you that way, you should not respond by promising to give her more snacks in the future. No, you should take away snacks, take away privileges, take away freedom until she learns how to speak to you and afford you the respect that she owes you. The only things you have to give her are the basic necessities to keep her alive. Everything else is a privilege, and privileges can and should be revoked if they are not deserved. I had to give my own daughter a lecture like this recently. She wasn’t scolding me for eating my own food out of my own fridge, and wouldn’t dare talk to me like that. But she did tell me, after I reprimanded her for not keeping her room clean, that it’s her room and she doesn’t know why I care so much whether it’s clean or not. I did not validate her feelings or get down to her level to make sure that she felt seen and heard. I didn’t get on my knees and look her in the eyes and say “I’m sorry you feel that way, sweetie. That must be so hard. I’d just really like it if your room was clean. Is that fair?” No, instead I stood there and simply said: “No, it’s not your room. It’s my room. It’s my house. I let you stay in this room under certain conditions. One of those conditions is that you keep it clean. That’s a requirement. Not a request. I’m going downstairs and when I come back up in an hour, it will be clean.” That’s it. I wasn’t negotiating or asking for permission or trying to come to a consensus. I simply asserted my authority, gave the instruction, and made sure that I was clear. It wasn’t any kind of revolutionary parenting technique. It was just parenting. I want to play one more gentle parenting video for you. Another thing you hear from the gentle parents is that you shouldn’t punish your children. You should instead rely on “natural consequences.” What does that mean? Well here’s another popular parenting TikTok influencer named Dr. Chelsey — she has a doctorate in education, but still uses the “doctor” prefix — explaining how consequences should work:   Well you should know from the start not to pay attention to a parenting guru who can’t even get her own kids to be quiet for two minutes so she can record a video. More to the point, there’s a major problem with the consequences she suggests. She calls them “natural” — I don’t even know what that’s supposed to mean in this context — but they would more aptly be called flimsy and toothless. The problem with a “consequence” like pulling the car over momentarily before you start driving again, or taking TV away only until dinner, is that those consequences cause no discomfort, pain, or even inconvenience to your children. They aren’t going to care about the consequences because there’s no reason to care. A consequence should be something that causes them enough grief that they want to avoid it in the future. No other consequence has any meaning or will have any impact. Think of the consequences that she says don’t work: taking away screen time, grounding, taking away a party that they were supposed to go to. But those are all good consequences, effective consequences, because they are consequences a child will not like. A child will be upset about losing screen time, losing a party, etc. And that’s the whole point of the consequence. If they are not upset with the consequence, then it was not a consequence. The problem is that many parents today are terrified of making their children upset. They’d rather be friends than authority figures. They’re so focused on “validating” their kids that they’ve lost all sight of the much more important job, which is guiding, instructing, and civilizing their kids. That is the primary role of a parent. That IS parenting. Gentle parenting — like so many modern methods to come before it, and so many that will come after — may more accurately be called non-parenting. It is not a new way of fulfilling your parenting duties, but a way of abdicating them entirely.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Wire Feed
Daily Wire Feed
1 y

Justin Timberlake’s License Suspended After DWI Arrest, Judge Threatens His Attorney With Gag Order
Favicon 
www.dailywire.com

Justin Timberlake’s License Suspended After DWI Arrest, Judge Threatens His Attorney With Gag Order

Justin Timberlake had his license suspended following his DWI (driving while intoxicated) arrest in June in New York and his attorney was threated with a gag order. The 43-year-old pop star appeared virtually on Friday where he pleaded not guilty for a second time to the charge in Sag Harbor Village Justice Court, NBC News reported. During the hearing, Justice Carl Irace announced that the pop star’s out-of-state New York license would be suspended because Timberlake refused to take a breathalyzer test on June 18 when he was pulled over, the outlet noted. The judge also blasted the singer’s attorney, Edward Burke, for his “irresponsible” comments, claiming that it “comes off as an attempt to poison the case before it even begins,” NBC News noted. A Sag Harbor Village judge suspended Justin Timberlake’s driving privileges at a virtual hearing after the pop star pleaded not guilty to a charge of driving while intoxicated https://t.co/SeJapYiJiX pic.twitter.com/kIVicqDXTL — Reuters (@Reuters) August 2, 2024 Justice Irace even threatened Burke with a gag order if he continued to make such comments. However, the judge never shared exactly what those comments were, the outlet noted. The hearing took place after Burke claimed the case would be dismissed, alleging the police screwed up when they arrested Timberlake, as previously reported. At the time, Burke told the court that his client was “not intoxicated” when he was arrested. “The police made a number of very significant errors in this case,” Burke said in his statement. “Justin respects law enforcement and the very important job that they do. He cooperated with the police officers at all times and treated them with the respect they deserve.” WATCH THE TRAILER FOR ‘AM I RACIST?’ — A MATT WALSH COMEDY ON DEI “He also respects the entire judicial process including the District Attorney and Judge who were in court today,” he added. “But the fact remains, he was not intoxicated and they made an error in arresting him for it. We are confident that this charge will be dismissed.” Surveillance footage from the night of the arrest shows Timberlake’s 2025 BMW driving down a deserted street near the American Hotel in Sag Harbor in the Hamptons. The arrest report says Timberlake was stopped after a police officer noticed him ignoring a stop sign and “fail[ing] to keep on the right side of the roadway,” People noted. The officer reported that Timberlake’s “eyes were bloodshot and glassy, a strong odor of an alcoholic beverage was emanating from his breath, he was unable to divide attention, he had slowed speech, he was unsteady afoot, and he performed poorly on all standardized field sobriety tests.” The report also noted that Timberlake said, “I had one martini and I followed my friends home.” The “Cry Me a River” singer was charged with one count of driving while intoxicated and was given citations for running a stop sign and failure to keep in lane. The next hearing Timberlake might need to appear at will take place September 13, NBC News noted. Related: Justin Timberlake Lawyer Argues In Court Singer Wasn’t Intoxicated During DWI Arrest
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 60245 out of 97134
  • 60241
  • 60242
  • 60243
  • 60244
  • 60245
  • 60246
  • 60247
  • 60248
  • 60249
  • 60250
  • 60251
  • 60252
  • 60253
  • 60254
  • 60255
  • 60256
  • 60257
  • 60258
  • 60259
  • 60260
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund