California is heavily regulated, and housing is no exception. People hurt by nature in the past have often had to wait years to rebuild. Some people are worried that California, a WEF-friendly state, will try to use this as an opportunity to build those 15-minute cities with hi-rises. If nothing else, it won’t be easy […] The post The Nightmare of Rebuilding in California After the Fires appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

'Based on your conduct, Major League Baseball ("MLB") is banning you indefinitely'

Denmark to Trump: Let's Make a Deal?

During the Cold War, a time defined by covert operations and technological innovation, one of the CIA’s most ambitious espionage projects was Project Aquiline. This classified initiative aimed to revolutionize intelligence gathering with bird-shaped drones powered by nuclear energy. However, despite its cutting-edge aspirations, the project never made it beyond the testing phase. Project Aquiline was conceived as the CIA’s first uncrewed system for covert reconnaissance. The agency sought to develop small, bird-like drones that could infiltrate restricted areas undetected. Based initially on the study of flight characteristics of birds, Aquiline was envisioned as a long-range vehicle that could safely and stealthily provide a window into denied areas. Credit: CIA Designed by McDonnell Douglas, a defense contractor renowned for its military aircraft, the drone measured five feet in length, had a wingspan of 7.5 feet, and weighed just 83 pounds. The drone’s specifications were ahead of its time. Equipped with a silent 3.5-horsepower, four-cycle engine, Aquiline could achieve speeds of 47 to 80 knots, reach altitudes of 20,000 feet, and endure flights lasting up to 50 hours over distances of 1,200 miles. Its compact design included optical cameras, infrared sensors, and electronic intelligence equipment capable of intercepting communications and radar signals. Aerial intelligence collection platforms have played a critical role in US national security from the earliest beginnings of aviation. Credit: CIA The Promise of Nuclear Power To extend its range and operational duration, the CIA envisioned equipping Aquiline with a nuclear power source. A radioisotope thermoelectric generator (RTG) would convert heat from decaying plutonium into electricity, potentially enabling the drone to remain airborne for 30 days or cover 36,000 miles. This same technology was used in deep space missions, demonstrating its potential for long-term energy supply. Aquiline’s bird-like design was deliberate. By mimicking the appearance and behavior of a bird, the drone could evade detection by both radar and human observers. The CIA described it as a “small, bird-like surreptitious vehicle” that blended seamlessly into its natural environment. This deceptive quality was critical for operations near high-security sites in the Soviet Union and China. Despite its innovative design, Aquiline faced significant technical and logistical hurdles. The drone lacked landing gear, requiring it to crash into nets upon return. These landings often damaged the wings and propellers, leading to delays and additional costs. Out of several prototypes tested, three were destroyed during these precarious recoveries. Another issue was the limited technology of the era. Data storage options were bulky and inefficient, necessitating reliance on a modified DC-6 or U-2R spy plane to collect intelligence mid-flight. This workaround added complexity to an already intricate operation. CIA’s 1960s OXCART Program and its use of U-2s are examples of collection innovations that have kept US leaders informed about adversaries’ capabilities and intentions. Credit: CIA The Demands of Secrecy The project’s secrecy was unparalleled. Personnel were subjected to rigorous security clearances, with recruitment starting two years before the anticipated first flight. Testing occurred at the enigmatic Area 51, where engineers painted one prototype bright orange to improve visibility during test flights—yet even then, the drone’s small size made it difficult to spot. By 1970, testing was underway, and the CIA hoped to transition the project to full operational status. However, the program was quietly shelved. While it never became operational, the concept proved invaluable as a forerunner to today’s multi-capability UAVs. Credit: CIA The exact reasons remain unclear, but they likely included technical limitations, high costs, and the risk of exposure. If the Soviets or Chinese had identified the drones, their anti-aircraft defenses could have easily neutralized them. Although Project Aquiline never became operational, it represented a bold leap forward in espionage technology. The concept of a bird-like drone powered by nuclear energy underscores the lengths to which intelligence agencies were willing to go during the Cold War. As drone technology in 2025 continues to push boundaries—from military applications to mysterious sightings—the question of whether prototypes of these Cold War creations survive takes on new turn. Do these “radioactive birds” of the past hold clues to the advancements and mysteries of today’s UAPs? The post CIA Already Has Nuclear-Powered ‘Eagle’ Drones Back In 60s appeared first on Anomalien.com.

If there’s one thing Donald Trump understands, it’s the art of the deal. The architect of America’s new political realignment saw the value that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his broad coalition of voters brought to the table. So he invited them to join his campaign. It worked. That partnership led to a historic win that gave the Republican Party a rare “trifecta,” control over the White House, the House, and the Senate. It also gave the GOP a mandate to deliver on the MAGA agenda.But what about the “Make America Healthy Again” agenda?RFK has already committed to put in place the same set of historic pro-life policies that President Trump implemented during his first term.Well, that was also part of the mandate. Trump made it clear that he valued RFK’s insights on the campaign trail. Now, he’s tapped him to head the Department of Health and Human Services. That’s not just an alliance. It’s a merger. MAGA and MAHA are officially united under one banner to accomplish our shared goals.And one of those goals is to revitalize the American family. President Trump and RFK have a great opportunity to return the family to the heart of public policy by reforming HHS to focus less on promoting abortion, DEI, and gender ideology and more on promoting family formation and better health outcomes.Still, some of my closest friends and movement allies have privately expressed concerns to me about RFK’s previous statements in support of abortion. I get it. I had my own concerns and voiced them publicly during the campaign. But I suspect we can trust him on this issue for three reasons.First, Kennedy doesn’t appear to be captured by the modern left’s abortion fanaticism. While many Democrats proudly trumpet their support of elective abortion at any point throughout a pregnancy, even supporting late-term abortions when the baby can feel pain, Kennedy’s position has always been less gung-ho. On the campaign trail, he declared that “every abortion is a tragedy,” expressed his opposition to elective late-term abortions, and suggested that he would support restrictions on abortions after “a certain number of weeks.” This is a very far cry from the radicalism of the modern pro-abortion movement.Second, Kennedy has every reason to follow through on his side of the bargain and execute Trump’s agenda at HHS. Kennedy has his own priorities, and Trump is giving him free rein to pursue shared goals. He’s not going to let previous lukewarm convictions about abortion get in the way.Trump will be running point on abortion policy, not RFK, and Kennedy will certainly not be overruling Trump’s pro-life agenda at HHS. He has an agenda he wants to focus on, and that agenda does not include shilling for the abortion industry.Third and most importantly, RFK has already committed to put in place the same set of historic pro-life policies that President Trump implemented during his first term.In a thread on X last month, Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) laid out a few of the specific policies that this would entail. Kennedy has pledged to end taxpayer funding of organizations that perform or promote abortions, both domestically and overseas. He has pledged to reinstate “the bar on Title X funds going to organizations that promote abortions.” He has pledged to reinstate conscience protections for medical professionals so that they can’t be forced to dismember children against their will. He’s pledged that all his deputies will be pro-life. And he’s pledged to reverse the Biden rule that ridiculously “reinterpreted” anti-discrimination law to force doctors to perform abortions.We also have no reason to doubt RFK on the transgender issue. Again according to Hawley, Kennedy has already pledged to reverse Biden’s HHS rule that classified a doctor's refusal to perform sex-change operations on children as illegal discrimination. And there is no indication that Kennedy would stand in the way of the rest of Trump’s plans to protect America’s children, either.Trump made his agenda known from the early days of the campaign: He plans to block all federal funds from going toward sex-change procedures, and he plans to kick hospitals out of the Medicaid and Medicare programs if they continue to perform sex-change procedures for minors. He also announced that he would order HHS to investigate Big Pharma for illegally marketing hormones or puberty blockers for off-label use. RFK should take particular joy in that one.I’ve liked most of President Trump’s nominations, so it’s hard to pick a favorite. But the RFK Jr. nomination is certainly up near the top. He’s a change agent in a department that desperately needs change. He’s a disruptor who will be overseeing powerful industries that desperately need disruption. That’s exactly the type of person we should want leading Health and Human Services.

CLEANSING FIRE! Mike Waltz Purges Biden's NSC Team (and Alex Vindman Has a Good Cry About It)

Pod Save America Solicits Donations for Fire Victims (It's Been Community Noted Where the Link Goes)

CNN's Resident 'Fact' Checker Shown to be Completely Wrong in Defending Dems on Wildfire Water Issues

The Battle of Gettysburg during the U.S. Civil War is usually considered a victory for the North; however, alternative arguments can be made. Here, Jeb Smith considers whether Gettysburg was really a major defeat for the Confederacy. Bayonet charge by the Union’s 1st Minnesota against Confederate forces on July 2, 1863. By Dan Troiani, available here.In his lecture series on the U.S. Civil War, renowned historian Gary Gallagher explained that the South in 1863 did not perceive the Battle of Gettysburg as a defeat but rather as a draw. Even though it ultimately fell short of its primary objective, to achieve a significant victory over the Army of the Potomac and thus bring about peace talks, many Southern leaders saw the campaign as a success because it pulled the Federals out of Virginia, providing its war-ravaged farmlands much-needed rest. It also maneuvered the war to the North where Confederates lived off of Northern farms and supplies. Famed cavalry general Jeb Stuart wrote his wife, "Gen Lee maneuvering the Yankees out of Virginia is the grandest piece of strategy ever heard of.”Gary Gallagher mentioned how the Battle of Gettysburg was not driven from the field for the South; they simply failed to remove the Federals from their positions on Day 3. Since they made an orderly retreat rather than being driven from the battlefield, the engagement was viewed by most at the time as a draw. Some Southern soldiers (and the populace, newspapers, etc.) viewed it as a victory since they won day 1, driving the Federals back, and maintained their positions on days 2 and 3. In Jeb Stuart: The Last Cavalier Burke Davis wrote, “There was not a spirit of defeat in the army this morning; men waited hopefully for Federal attack on their hill.” BattleGallagher described Day 1 as one of the great attacking victories of the war, with Southern forces successfully pushing back two Federal corps and inflicting heavy losses. On Day 2, the outnumbered South launched an attack against Federals who were entrenched on high ground, managing to cause more damage than they sustained. Federal General George Meade was so bloodied after Day 2 that he considered retreating and made plans to do so, but his subordinates persuaded him to stay. As Confederate General James Longstreet was quoted as saying in the Ken Burns Documentary on the Civil War, “When the second day's battle was over General Lee declared it a success.”By the end of the three-day bloodbath, the Federals had suffered such enormous casualties (the largest of any battle of the war) that they did not mount a significant offensive in Virginia for 10 months.Many see Gettysburg as a major defeat because Lee never invaded the North again. Yet this had more to do with the cumulative loss of manpower to all Southern armies and a drop in morale coupled with larger, more aggressive Northern armies. At the time, nobody knew Lee would not invade again, and some thought he would. General Jeb Stuart wrote his wife on July 13th “We return without defeat to recuperate and reinforce when no doubt the role will be reenacted."Further, Confederate General Jubal Early invaded the North in ‘64, at one point threatening Washington D.C., and Lee sent Longstreet and two divisions to Tennessee after Gettysburg, enabling Braxton Bragg to take the offensive there and win the battle of Chickamauga. If Lee had just suffered a significant defeat or thought himself in danger, why would he send his top corps with two veteran divisions to the Western theatre? Why not consolidate defensively? Instead, he was still thinking offensively. And Lee showed the South had plenty of fight left in ‘64. Loss?Others say the South lost the war at Gettysburg; I don't see how this is so. Gettysburg, combined with Vicksburg, was a big blow to Southern manpower. However, it could also be argued the South was already finished when Stonewall Jackson died. But still, regardless of Jackson and the results of Gettysburg and Vicksburg, Lincoln was not likely to be reelected (Peace Democrats would have triumphed) until General Sherman captured Atlanta and Jubal Early (who was making headlines) was defeated in the Shenandoah Valley. Those events, along with Admiral Farragut’s earlier triumph at Mobile Bay, secured Lincoln's reelection and won the war for the North, not Gettysburg. The high casualties of 1864 and battles like Gettysburg (union losses of 23,000) almost cost the Union the war, and the people of the North desired peace, until new Union victories restored popular morale.  Jeb Smith is the author of four books, the most recent being Missing Monarchy: Correcting Misconceptions About The Middle Ages, Medieval Kingship, Democracy, And Liberty. Before that, he published Defending Dixie’s Land: What Every American Should Know About The South And The Civil War. Smith has authored dozens of articles in various publications, including The Postil Magazine, History is Now Magazine, Medieval History, Medieval Magazine and Fellowship & Fairydust, and featured on various podcasts.

The Justice Department has asked a federal appeals court to move swiftly in reversing a judge's order that had blocked the agency from releasing any part of special counsel Jack Smith's investigative report on President-elect Donald Trump.