Watch the Friday sermon at the Mosque the New Orleans terrorist attended below. We have a radical Islamist problem in the United States, and we are doing nothing about it. In fact, our open borders made it much worse. The imam of the mosque told a story of the people of Saturday. “Allah ordered them […] The post Terrorist’s Imam: Allah Turned Jews Into Monkeys, Pigs, Rats appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

In 2022, a Rochester community school district in suburban Detroit settled a lawsuit for nearly $200,000 with a mom who claimed the district was keeping a dossier on parents who opposed COVID lockdowns. Another mom was given a bill for $33 million to respond to a FOIA request. The school is back in the news. […] The post $33M for a FOIA Request! What Is This MI District Hiding? appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

Prominent legal scholar and George Washington University Law School professor Jonathan Turley on Friday criticized Judge Juan Merchan’s recent decisions in the hush-money case against President-elect Donald Trump as the “final cathartic act for lawfare warriors.” As highlighted by The Daily Wire, Judge Merchan on Friday dismissed a Trump bid to have the hush-money case dismissed due partly to a U.S. Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity. Instead, the Democrat judge assigned Trump’s sentencing for January 10, ten days before his inauguration, and signaled that he’ll impose an “unconditional discharge.” Turley explained that the decision effectively provides a “talking point” for the anti-Trump media on Inauguration Day — that Trump’s a convicted felon — but it also allows Trump a path to an appeal. “Judge Merchan just set Trump for a sentencing shortly before his inauguration. As some of us predicted, he is indicating that he will impose an unconditional discharge without jail or probation,” Turley explained on X. “The sentence will finalize the case and allow for an appeal.” However, Turley noted, the decision also labels Trump “a convicted felon just before he is sworn into office,” which the law professor said was “the final cathartic act for lawfare warriors.” …The sentence will finalize the case and allow for an appeal. However, it would also label the President-elect a convicted felon just before he is sworn into office. It is the final cathartic act for lawfare warriors… — Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) January 3, 2025 “Merchan will supply the talking point for the inauguration coverage as reporters repeat the mantra of the historic status of Trump being sworn in as a convicted felon,” Turley said. At the same time, Trump “will also finally be able to see an appeal of his case,” he explained. “While there are low expectations for the New York court system, the sentencing will allow the full array of alleged errors by Merchan to be placed before appellate judges.” …we will also finally be able to see an appeal of his case. While there are low expectations for the New York court system, the sentencing will allow the full array of alleged errors by Merchan to be placed before appellate judges. — Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) January 3, 2025 “While this Court as a matter of law must not make any determination on sentencing prior to giving the parties and Defendants opportunity to be heard, it seems proper at this juncture to make known the Court’s inclination to not impose any sentence of incarceration, a sentence authorized by the conviction but one the People concede they no longer view as a practicable recommendation,” Judge Merchan wrote in his ruling. Trump spokesperson Steven Cheung reacted to the decision on Friday, calling it “a direct violation of the Supreme Court’s Immunity decision and other longstanding jurisprudence. This lawless case should have never been brought and the Constitution demands that it be immediately dismissed.” “There should be no sentencing, and President Trump will continue fighting against these hoaxes until they are all dead,” Cheung added. Related: Fani Willis Disqualified From Trump Election Case. What Does That Mean For Trump?

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. Apple has agreed to a $95 million cash settlement to resolve a proposed class action lawsuit accusing the tech giant of breaching user privacy through its Siri voice assistant. The preliminary settlement, filed in a federal court in Oakland, California, awaits approval from US District Judge Jeffrey White. The lawsuit alleged that Siri recorded private conversations inadvertently activated by users and disclosed these recordings to third parties, including advertisers. Siri, like other voice assistants, responds to “hot words” such as “Hey, Siri,” which can unintentionally trigger recording. Plaintiffs claimed this led to targeted ads based on private discussions, citing examples such as ads for Air Jordan sneakers after casual mentions of the brands. One plaintiff also reported receiving ads for a surgical treatment brand after a private conversation with their doctor. The lawsuit covers users of Siri-enabled devices, including iPhones and Apple Watches, from September 17, 2014, when the “Hey, Siri” feature was introduced, to December 31, 2024. Class members, estimated to number in the tens of millions, could receive up to $20 per eligible device. Apple denied any wrongdoing in agreeing to the settlement and did not immediately comment on the matter. Similarly, the plaintiffs’ attorneys have yet to issue statements. From the $95 million settlement fund, attorneys may seek up to $28.5 million in legal fees and an additional $1.1 million for expenses. For Apple, the settlement represents a fraction of its financial might, equivalent to just nine hours of profit. The Cupertino-based company reported a net income of $93.74 billion in its most recent fiscal year. This lawsuit isn’t the only privacy-related legal battle involving voice assistants. A separate case against Google’s Voice Assistant is ongoing in a federal court in San Jose, California, within the same judicial district. The same law firms represent the plaintiffs in both lawsuits. If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The post Apple Settles $95M Class Action Over Siri Privacy Violations appeared first on Reclaim The Net.

This content is for members only. Visit the site and log in/register to read. The post Linking Ancient Texts with UAPs Emerging from the Sea appeared first on Anomalien.com.