YubNub Social YubNub Social
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2026 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2026 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

YubNub News
YubNub News
1 y

Colorado Property Management Company Tells The Truth, EXPOSES Kamala Harris!
Favicon 
yubnub.news

Colorado Property Management Company Tells The Truth, EXPOSES Kamala Harris!

In a move even fact checkers can’t deny, CBZ Management called out Aurora’s Democrat-led government. Why? It turns out they were shrugging off warnings about a gang-led apartment takeover. Instead…
Like
Comment
Share
YubNub News
YubNub News
1 y

BRUTAL! Trump Tells Al Smith Dinner Crowd Why He's Not Worried About 'White Dudes for Harris'
Favicon 
yubnub.news

BRUTAL! Trump Tells Al Smith Dinner Crowd Why He's Not Worried About 'White Dudes for Harris'

You've no doubt by now heard about the "White Dudes for Harris" movement that's a desperate attempt to try and bring men into the fold and vote for Joe Biden's replacement.  Advertisement The group…
Like
Comment
Share
YubNub News
YubNub News
1 y

The Look on Chuck Schumer's Face While Listening to Trump Brutally Roast Dems Says It ALL
Favicon 
yubnub.news

The Look on Chuck Schumer's Face While Listening to Trump Brutally Roast Dems Says It ALL

The Al Smith dinner in New York City was held Thursday evening, and many political heavy hitters were in attendance, but not Kamala Harris. The Democrat nominee claimed to have a scheduling conflict and…
Like
Comment
Share
Science Explorer
Science Explorer
1 y

The Paradox of a Mysterious Brown Dwarf Has Finally Been Solved
Favicon 
www.sciencealert.com

The Paradox of a Mysterious Brown Dwarf Has Finally Been Solved

It's not what we thought!
Like
Comment
Share
Classic Rock Lovers
Classic Rock Lovers  
1 y

Questioning the validity of art itself: Patti Smith’s improvised, apocalyptic masterpiece
Favicon 
faroutmagazine.co.uk

Questioning the validity of art itself: Patti Smith’s improvised, apocalyptic masterpiece

The role of the artist. The post Questioning the validity of art itself: Patti Smith’s improvised, apocalyptic masterpiece first appeared on Far Out Magazine.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y

Kamala Harris: The New Coke
Favicon 
spectator.org

Kamala Harris: The New Coke

In 1985, the Coca-Cola Company took one of the biggest gambles in marketing history. It changed the formula for its widely popular soft drink and branded it “New Coke.” The result was an unmitigated disaster. Sales crashed, and the company became the brunt of jokes on the late-night talk shows that were popular in that era. Fast forward to 2024 and political image makers have created the “New Kamala.” They have repacked the unpopular far-left vice president of the failed administration currently in power as a moderate offering a “new way forward.” Unlike Coca-Cola, Democrats are unable to go back to their original product — Joe Biden — and are stuck with a failing replacement. There is an old saying in advertising that good advertising makes a bad product fail faster. Thus, as Kamala’s summer of joy fades into the autumn of reality, voters are finding she is not as advertised. The underlying problem for Kamala Harris and Democratic candidates all across Rush Limbaugh’s fruited plain is that not only their record — but the present reality — on the two issues voters care about most (the economy and immigration) cut against them.   Yes, government statics show the rate of inflation has declined, unemployment is low and the jobs market is strong, and the Fed has implemented an election year interest rate cut. But, with inflation having soared over 20 percent on the Biden–Harris watch, voters are not feeling the joy. Pennsylvania, with its 19 electoral votes, is being touted as the most important battleground state. There is no path to the White House for Kamala Harris if she loses Penn’s woods and a very narrow path for Donald Trump if he loses the state. Harris has not been successful in untethering herself from the Biden record. In recent interviews in sympathetic venues, she has been unable to articulate even one difference she has with Joe Biden. That effectively undercuts the “new way forward” message. Various polls have shown that voters believe they were better off during the first Trump administration than they currently are under the Biden–Harris administration. The Commonwealth Foundation’s most recent Common Ground poll conducted the last week of September found inflation and rising costs to be the top concerns of voters. The poll’s analysis states: “Nearly seven-in-ten registered voters say inflation and price increases impact their family’s ability to maintain their standard of living … over half of all voters surveyed say their economic conditions are worsening.”  The poll digs deeper: “High energy costs contribute to the inflation squeeze. According to the survey, 77% of respondents say their energy bills have increased over the past two years (33% saying “a lot”). A significant majority (71%) say they are concerned about their ability to afford their family’s energy needs.”  Voters clearly feel that both the state and nation are headed in the wrong direction. The Commonwealth Foundation voter poll found that 68 percent of respondents believe America is on the wrong track, while only 26 percent think the country is going in the right direction. Fifty-seven percent say Pennsylvania is on the wrong track, while 33 percent think the state is headed in the right direction. The Fall 2024 Keystone Business Climate Survey, conducted by the Lincoln Institute of Public Opinion Research, found the owners, top executives, and managers of businesses in the state to likewise be in a surly mood. By a three-to-one margin, respondents to the poll say the state’s economy has gotten worse, not better over the past six months. Forty-five percent said the state’s business climate has gotten worse over the past six months; just 17 percent say it has gotten better. For comparison, in the Spring 2024 Keystone Business Climate Survey, 36 percent of respondents said business conditions had gotten worse in the preceding six months, while 26 percent felt conditions had improved.  Inflation is clearly the key factor. Forty-six percent of the business leaders responding cited inflation as their top challenge, with 42 percent citing concern over current economic conditions and 37 percent citing concern over future economic conditions. Ninety percent of those participating in the Fall 2024 Keystone Business Climate Survey said inflation has impacted their business, with 49 percent saying the impact has been significant. On the other major issue — immigration — 56 percent report that illegal immigration has had a negative impact in Pennsylvania, with 31 percent saying the impact has been significantly negative. Fifteen percent believe illegal immigration has had a positive impact on the state. And so on, from the board room to the kitchen table, Pennsylvanians are unhappy with the current condition of the economy and think things are headed in the wrong direction. The problem for Kamala Harris is, as it was with New Coke, is that consumers simply don’t like the product. The question is: Will Donald Trump be the Pepsi Cola who benefits from that failure? Lowman S. Henry is Chairman & CEO of the Lincoln Institute and host of the weekly American Radio Journal and Lincoln Radio Journal. His e-mail address is lhenry@lincolninstitute.org. The post Kamala Harris: The New Coke appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y

The Spectacle Ep. 157: Indigenous People’s Day Is Over. Americans Choose Christopher Columbus.
Favicon 
spectator.org

The Spectacle Ep. 157: Indigenous People’s Day Is Over. Americans Choose Christopher Columbus.

The woke Left continues to push for Indigenous People’s Day to replace Columbus Day, but Americans are pushing back. In this episode of The Spectacle Podcast, hosts Melissa Mackenzie and Scott McKay discuss how Americans are over DEI holidays like Indigenous People’s Day. They also discuss the forgotten history often dismissed by the Left, such as the true origins of slavery. Scott harkens to a scene from Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee, which accurately depicts the relationship between the natives and colonists. (READ MORE: Indigenous Peoples’ Day: Cherokee Leader Stand Watie) Tune in to hear their discussion!    Listen to The Spectacle with Melissa Mackenzie and Scott McKay on Spotify. Watch The Spectacle with Melissa Mackenzie and Scott McKay on Rumble.  The post <i>The Spectacle</i> Ep. 157: Indigenous People’s Day Is Over. Americans Choose Christopher Columbus. appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y

At Stake in This Election: Manhood and Womanhood
Favicon 
spectator.org

At Stake in This Election: Manhood and Womanhood

This election cycle has been a bit of an odd one. There are plenty of important policy issues that could define it — the border, taxation, inflation, or foreign aid, for example — but none of them (despite how much Americans care about some of them) have risen to the fore. Instead, Americans — particularly young Americans — are having an identity crisis about a far more fundamental issue: sex. (No, this isn’t about to become a discussion of the marital act. I’m using that word in its more antiquated sense to refer to the binary biological human types.) (READ MORE: Is This Right? Is America Now R+7?) The crisis is so palpable that the Free Press called sex the defining issue of the election, and in the context of this election, we’re being asked to choose role models. When Tim Walz joined the Democratic ticket, liberal journalists and campaign strategists were convinced that he would be the silver bullet they needed to win the male vote. “Any liberal Democrat whose resume includes football coach, military veteran and sharp-shooting hunter is a challenge to MAGA mythology,” Francis Wilkinson wrote recently. Wilkinson might have been on to something if Walz could hold a gun comfortably and hadn’t lied about the details of his military service record. Democrats would like Tim Walz and Doug Emhoff to represent the new American man — a man who can dabble in sports and hunting but isn’t afraid to let the woman in his life run the show (or the country). It’s the American man radical feminists have always wanted. I can’t speak as a young man, but I can imagine it’s an uninspiring model. As a young woman, I can tell you it’s certainly an unattractive model. Of course, I’m not the first person to make note of all this, and I’m hardly the first person to say that it doesn’t seem to be working all that well. (Nate Hochman wrote a fantastic article for our latest magazine on the growing conservative cohort of young men, so definitely check that out!) Unfortunately, it might just be working well enough in this particular election. (READ MORE: Why I’m Voting for Donald Trump) According to a recent Harvard Youth poll, voters under 30 favor Kamala Harris by a 2-to-1 ratio. Another poll has young women in that age group favoring her by a 3-to-1 ratio. What many of us conservative commentators haven’t really talked about is the fact that the Democratic war on women, particularly young women, is working quite well. To be fair to the Trump campaign (which has barely even tried to reverse the trend), Democrats have won the votes of young women for quite some time now. But, it seems that women in general are particularly energized this year by the fact that Kamala Harris (a woman) is running for president and is extraordinarily vocal about “women’s rights” (especially women’s so-called “right” to kill unborn children). The Democrats’ new American man, with his feminine-flavored masculinity, may not be superbly effective, but their vision of the American woman as a girl-boss certainly is. Kamala Harris, having employed her feminine wiles to achieve power in California and then, perhaps by accident, having been propelled first to the vice presidency, and then to the presidential campaign stage, is the role model young women are being urged to support. (READ MORE: Krugman Tries to Denigrate Trump, Stumbles, and Flips Out) Because young women, by and large, haven’t discovered via experience that traditional forms of femininity are far more rewarding than the pant-suit feminine model they’ve been taught to try and emulate, Kamala Harris is (and this may come as a shock to the readers of this magazine) an attractive and even inspiring role model. Instead of making the election about policy and politics, Harris and Walz are playing to the identity crisis many young Americans are in the midst of. They’re forcing us to make a decision about what it means to be a man or a woman in our society. The post At Stake in This Election: Manhood and Womanhood appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y

46 Years Ago, the Soviet Empire’s End Was Set in Motion
Favicon 
spectator.org

46 Years Ago, the Soviet Empire’s End Was Set in Motion

On Oct. 16, 1978, the cardinal electors of the Roman Catholic Church elected Polish Cardinal Karol Wojtyla to sit on the Chair of St. Peter. Wojtyla took the name Pope John Paul II, having succeeded John Paul I, who died suddenly after serving as Roman pontiff for only 33 days. Though few recognized it at the time, the papal election of Karol Wojtyla was the beginning of the end of the Soviet empire. As George Weigel explained in The End and the Beginning, John Paul II, only eight months after his election, “ignited a revolution of conscience in his native Poland — a moral challenge to the Cold War status quo that helped set in motion the international drama that would culminate in the collapse of European communism in 1989 and the demise of the Soviet Union in 1991.” Wojtyla and his countrymen and countrywomen had suffered under the twin evils of 20th-century totalitarianism: Nazism and Communism. He was, wrote Paul Johnson in John Paul II and the Catholic Restoration, “the first pope from the Slavic east and the first pope with direct experience of the greatest challenge Christianity has ever faced, totalitarian atheism.” Weigel notes that one person who did recognize the potential impact that a Polish pope would have on the Soviet bloc was Alexander Solzhenitsyn, the famous Soviet dissident and author of The Gulag Archipelago who, from his exile in Cavendish, Vermont, said of Wojtyla’s election: “It’s a miracle. It’s the first positive event since World War I, and its going to change the face of the world.” Solzhenitsyn understood better than most the political fragility of the Soviet system and the power of spirituality to move men. Karol Wojtyla possessed intellectual curiosity, physical courage, and immense spirituality. He needed all three when he traveled to his native Poland on June 2, 1979, for a nine-day pilgrimage in which more than 12 million Poles came to see him in person. He broadcast to his fellow Poles and to the men in the Kremlin that “Christ cannot be kept out of the history of man in any part of the globe,” and “[t]here can be no just Europe without the independence of Poland marked on its map.” “That,” writes Paul Kengor in A Pope and a President, “was a shot heard in Moscow.” John Paul II, wrote Malachi Martin in The Keys of This Blood, “had opened the first effective challenge to the political order of the Soviet satellite system, and of the Soviet Union itself.” The Soviet empire had suffered the first tremors of a theological and political earthquake. The atheists in the Kremlin understood the threat that Pope John Paul II posed to their East European empire and to the very survival of the Soviet Union. Wojtyla’s message did not stop at the borders of Poland — it reverberated throughout the enslaved nations of Eastern and Central Europe. Two years later, another tremor struck the evil empire when workers in Gdansk, Poland, founded the Solidarity trade union in a direct challenge to the so-called “workers’ state.” But even before the rise of Solidarity in Poland, the men in the Kremlin issued a directive to the secret police, quoted in Kengor’s book, that stated: “Use all possibilities available to the Soviet Union to prevent the new course of policies initiated by the Polish pope; if necessary with additional measures beyond disinformation and discreditation.” Kengor notes that the directive was signed by nine members of the Soviet leadership, including Mikhail Gorbachev. George Weigel writes that “within a year after John Paul’s election, the Soviet political leadership and … Soviet intelligence considered the Pope the single greatest threat to their position.”  The Kremlin set in motion the assassination attempt against John Paul II on May 13, 1981, in St. Peter’s Square. Turkish terrorist Mehemet Ali Agca shot the pope. The late journalist Claire Sterling was perhaps the first non-governmental official to connect the dots, which led back to the Bulgarian secret police and ultimately the Soviet KGB. Sterling laid out the scheme hatched by the Kremlin in her book The Time of the Assassins, an example of investigative journalism at its best. Since then, other sources agree with Sterling that the KGB was behind the assassination attempt on the pope.  The assassination attempt failed. The Polish pope continued to send tremors throughout the Soviet empire. And he was joined in this by President Ronald Reagan, who rhetorically consigned Soviet communism to the “ash heap of history,” and substantively implemented policies — economic, military, technological, geopolitical — that further undermined Soviet power in the satellite empire and within the Soviet Union itself. No one tells that story better than Paul Kengor in his book A Pope and a President.  Joseph Shattan in his book Architects of Victory named John Paul II as one of the heroes of the Cold War. Shattan notes that even former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev admitted that, “Everything that happened in Eastern Europe in these last few years would have been impossible without the presence of this Pope and without the important role — including the political role — that he played on the world stage.”  The unraveling of the Soviet empire had many other causes, including its own systemic weaknesses, both economic and political. But that unraveling can all be traced back to Karol Wojtyla’s election as pope. Which means, Catholics believe, the hand of God was involved. READ MORE: The Synod on Synodality: Petering Out Into Irrelevance? The Vatican–China Pact Has Proved to Be a Catastrophe Pope Francis Equates Opposition to Illegal Immigration to Abortion The post 46 Years Ago, the Soviet Empire’s End Was Set in Motion appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
1 y

Why the Elites Are Using Weather Warfare To Collapse Society | Interview With Paul Stone
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

Why the Elites Are Using Weather Warfare To Collapse Society | Interview With Paul Stone

from The People’s Voice: TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 61117 out of 107507
  • 61113
  • 61114
  • 61115
  • 61116
  • 61117
  • 61118
  • 61119
  • 61120
  • 61121
  • 61122
  • 61123
  • 61124
  • 61125
  • 61126
  • 61127
  • 61128
  • 61129
  • 61130
  • 61131
  • 61132
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund