On today';s CNN This Morning‚ host Kasie Hunt danced on the latest media party line‚ that Donald Trump can';t pose as a ";moderate"; on abortion now after appointing Supreme Court justices that repealed Roe vs. Wade.But then Hunt unleashed a series of pro-abortion messages‚ airing for free 30 seconds of a new Biden-Harris campaign ad‚ as well as an ad for Democrat Gov. Steve Beshear of Kentucky‚ and a teary interview with Texas native Kate Cox from NBC News. Hunt emphasized women telling sympathetic stories about how the overturning of Roe impaired their ability to destroy their babies.The Biden ad‚ in which a sobbing Amanda Zurawski displays a tiny blanket for her child‚ ended with this blunt attack: ";Donald Trump did this."; Zurawski and Kate Cox have both been hosted in First Lady Jill Biden';s box during State of the Union addresses‚ underlining how Kasie Hunt seems like a Biden campaign surrogate.They can';t interview pro-life doctors who argue the pro-abortion forces mislead the public about state laws and miscarriage treatment. Hunt could only talk about abortions as ";the care she needed.";One thing CNN didn';t do‚ and can';t do‚ was to interview unborn babies. But if CNN could‚ you would hear heartbreaking stories of children who wanted to live‚ but had that possibility ripped away from them in unspeakably cruel fashion in states that won';t protect them from abortion. Hunt talks about ";protecting"; abortion rights‚ not protecting babies.Hunt ended her pitch for Biden by dramatically claiming that ";these are just three stories of countless stories like them‚ no doubt‚ unfolding across the country because of the fall of Roe vs. Wade."; Perhaps. But what is undoubtedly true is that under Roe‚ tens of millions of unborn babies perished‚ babies whose stories will never be told.Now with the overturning of Roe‚ some babies who otherwise would have died have been born‚ and in years to come will be able to express how thankful they are that the overturning of Roe gave them the chance to live.The balance between the rights of mothers and the unborn will be determined on a state-by-state basis. But CNN‚ like the rest of the liberal media‚ will only present the issue from the most heart-wrenching women';s perspectives--never of that of babies whose lives have been saved.Here';s the transcript.CNN This Morning4/11/246:00 am EDTKASIE HUNT: This morning‚ Republicans in the Arizona state legislature blocking attempts to repeal the 1864 law banning all abortion there with just a single exception for the life of the mother. As outrage grows‚ presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump is trying to convince voters that he doesn';t support the Arizona law‚ and now says he would not sign a national abortion ban if he is elected president.DONALD TRUMP [responding on the tarmac to a question]: Yeah‚ they did‚ and that';ll be straightened out. As you know‚ it';s all about states'; rights‚ and it';ll be straightened out‚ and I';m sure that the governor and everybody else are going to bring it back into reason‚ and that will be taken care of‚ I think‚ very quickly.REPORTER: Would you sign a national abortion ban if Congress sent it to your desk?TRUMP: [Shakes his head in the negative.] No.Hunt: No. Trump is trying to sound more moderate on an issue that has galvanized voters from Ohio to Kansas‚ to Kentucky to vote to protect abortion rights. But this Arizona law‚ and restrictions similar to it in other states‚ they are in force because of Donald Trump.Recall: how did he win the Republican nomination in the first place? Back in 2016‚ he released a list of 11 Supreme Court Justices he would consider appointing‚ to convince skeptical evangelical voters‚ who are the bedrock of the Republican base‚ that he‚ Trump‚ was one of them‚ or at least that he would act like one of them.Then‚ to hammer that home‚ he picked the very publicly pious Mike Pence as his running mate. And then‚ he was elected president‚ and he transformed the Supreme CourtTRUMP: Today‚ I am keeping another promise to the American people by nominating Judge Neil Gorsuch. I will nominate Judge Brett Kavanaugh. Judge Amy Coney Barrett.HUNT: In June of 2022‚ after nearly 50 years‚ the Court struck down Roe versus Wade. And Trump‚ who is now trying to say that he doesn';t support the strictest restrictions that have been exploding in red states across the country‚ he has repeatedly bragged about how he made that possible.TRUMP: We ended Roe v. Wade. We terminated Roe v. Wade. I was able to terminate Roe v. Wade after 50 years of trying.HUNT: The results have been stories like this one‚ told in a Biden campaign ad‚ yes‚ but about a woman‚ a family. who wanted their child‚ wanted a child‚ and were devastated by the consequences of the fall of Roe.BIDEN CAMPAIGN AD: [As mother speaks in the background‚ screen reads] At 18 weeks‚ Amanda';s water broke and she had a miscarriage. Because Donald Trump killed Roe v. Wade‚ Amanda was denied standard medical care to prevent infection: an abortion. the outfit she was gonna maybewhere home from the hospital. Doctors were forced to send her home.WOMAN IN AD: [Sobbing] This is the blanket that she was on.AD: Donald Trump did this.HUNT: There';s also Kate Cox. She';s the Texas woman who also desperately wanted a baby. When she was told that her baby likely wouldn';t live for more than a few days outside the womb‚ she sought an abortion to try to protect her ability to try again‚ to have a child. Here';s what she told NBC News in December.KATE COX: It';s a hard‚ hard time‚ you know‚ even with‚ you know‚ being hopeful with the decision that came from the hearing this morning. There';s‚ there';s still‚ we';re going through the loss of a child. There';s no outcome here that I take home my healthy baby girl‚ you know. So it';s hard‚ you know. Cox had to leave her home state of Texas to get the care that she needed.Then there was this woman‚ Hadley Duvall‚ who told her story in a campaign ad for Kentucky';s Democratic governor.BESHEAR CAMPAIGN AD: I was raped by my stepfather after years of sexual abuse. I was 12. Anyone who believes there should be no exceptions for rape and incest could never understand what it';s like to stand in my shoes.HUNT: These are just three stories of countless stories like them‚ no doubt‚ unfolding across the country because of the fall of Roe versus Wade.

Oh so now in America we cant even display the American flag without triggering people?The Borderline Dance team was kicked out of a Seattle dance convention called the Emerald City Hoedown for wearing American flag-themed shirts‚ which reportedly made others feel triggered and unsafe.Nope‚ this isn';t a joke.The country line dance convention was put on by the Rain Country Dance Association‚ an LGBTQ-focused western dance community‚ Jason Rantz noted on770 KTTH. The Borderline Dance team was invited to the event but when they arrived‚ said they didnt get the greeting they were expecting.The hostility against Borderline arose because the team wore matching shirts with American flags on them. Like are you serious?Sad part is‚ this is the first year that Borderline was even able to attend the event. According to the teamsFacebookpage‚ theyve been invited for the past three years but because of their Covid restrictions‚ we have been unable to [attend] until this year so they were stoked to get to attend this Spring. Heres more of what the team wrote in their Facebook post:Unfortunately‚ what our team was met with upon arrival was that our flag tops were offensive to some of the convention goers. There was a small group that felt triggered and unsafe. They had several claims for this reasoning. Mostly associated with the situation in Palestine and the Trans community in America. At first we were told we would just be bood‚ yelled at and likely many of them would walk out. This did not deter us. But then we were given an ultimatum. Remove the flag tops and perform in either street clothes (which most didnt bring as they traveled there in their uniforms) or they would supply us with ECH shirts from years past Or‚ dont perform at all‚ which effectively was asking us to leave.Turns out Borderline wasnt the only team who had to leave the convention. Their friends from West Coast Country Heat left‚ too‚ after sporting the same spirit of patriotism that Borderline did.Although we may not always agree with the current state of things‚ we recognize that being an American means true FREEDOM. We all understood and accepted this and walked out with class and dignity despite the discrimination we had experienced‚ the team added.Related:Disney-Owned ABC Procedural Drama Will Trent Paints Conservative Christians As Violent‚ Hateful‚ Murderous BigotsWhats super odd is that line dancing‚ in its most traditional form‚ is pretty American. When you look at the style of dance across the country‚ most dancers who partake wear cowboy hats‚ bootcut jeans‚ flannels and boots. Not to mention‚ most of it is done in America-loving areas like Texas or the deep South where the patriotism is often loved and honored. Country music is usually pretty pro-America too‚ and doesnt often tout super progressive ideas.Regardless of all of that‚ the Borderline dance team and the West Coast Country Heat shouldve been able to compete. If youre triggered by a t-shirt with a flag that represents the country that you live in on it‚ you should move overseas.Follow us on Twitter/X:In what world does trying to be an OnlyFans star do anything to honor a deceased grandfather?@tierin_rosebreaks down the left';s latest insanity in this week';s Woke of the Weak!pic.twitter.com/mvUFDdwPCb MRCTV (@mrctv)April 9‚ 2024

The network evening newscasts did their best to bury yesterdays bad inflation news. Literally. Both by leading their newscasts off with severe weather and by running their respective inflation items after the 10-minute mark.The most bizarre among these reports comes from NBC Nightly News‚ which bifurcated the story. First‚ a brief read by anchor Lester Holt on the inflation reports effect on the stock market‚ and then the rest as part of White House Correspondent Peter Alexanders roundup‚ which covered an array of subjects. Heres that reassembled report‚ as aired on NBC Nightly News on Wednesday‚ April 10th‚ 2024:LESTER HOLT: We';ll turn to the economy. Stock markets way down across the board today. The Dow losing more than 400 points after disappointing news about inflation. The government said inflation accelerated to 3.5% in March from a year ago‚ that was up from a 3.2% increase in prices in February.PETER ALEXANDER: Another challenge for the Biden campaign: the economy‚ with today';s headline that inflation ticked up again‚ even higher than expected. Housing and gas prices accounting for most of it. Overall prices up nearly 19% since president Biden took office. Former President Trump tonight:DONALD TRUMP: Biden has totally lost control of inflation. It';s back. It';s raging back.ALEXANDER: President Biden saying he';s made tremendous progress.JOE BIDEN: We have dramatically reduced inflation from 9% down to close to 3%...my opposition talks about two things. They just want to cut taxes for the wealthy and raise taxes on other people.In sum: bad news‚ a challenge for the Biden campaign‚ and tremendous progress. Peter Alexander depicts President Biden as a hapless victim of the inflation report‚ rather the one responsible for it. And‚ as always‚ the purest victim of any bad news is the electoral prospects of Joe Biden.Burial notwithstanding‚ ABC and CBS aired more substantial reports reflecting the pain felt by consumers. At ABC World News Tonight‚ anchor Whit Johnson framed the report as disappointing and concerning. Correspondent Elizabeth Schulze threw cold water on the idea of the Fed cutting interest rates until inflation stabilizes. (Click expand to view full transcript)ABC WORLD NEWS TONIGHTWEDNESDAY‚ APRIL 10th‚ 2024:WHIT JOHNSON: Now to that disappointing report on inflation. Consumer prices in March were up 3.5%‚ compared to a year ago‚ higher than expected. Report casting doubt on an interest rate cut in the near future. Here';s ABC';s Elizabeth Schulze.ELIZABETH SCHULZE: Tonight‚ Americans hoping to see the Federal Reserve cut interest rates as early as June may now have a longer wait‚ with inflation climbing for the third straight month.MAN ON THE STREET: The prices is too high.SCHULZE: The consumer price index up 3.5% in March from a year ago‚ fueled by higher costs for rent‚ car insurance‚ clothes‚ medical care‚ and gas.SUSAN STANKUS: I used to fill it up for 35 bucks‚ it was a beautiful thing.SCHULZE: And now it';s 45.STANKUS: 45‚ and sometimes it';s 60. Between food and gas‚ it';s had a big impact.SCHULZE: For Alexandria Jones at her vintage shop in Chicago‚ rent jumped from $1‚400 to $1‚800 a month.ALEXANDRIA JONES: I have to do a sale. I have to bring people in just so I can be able to deal with what is‚ you know‚ the inevitable of my rent being $400 more than it was.SCHULZE: To combat inflation the Fed increased borrowing costs to a 22-year high‚ making it more expensive to pay for a new mortgage‚ car‚ or credit card debt. President Biden today pointing to inflation';s improvement from 9% two years ago‚ still predicting an interest rate cut this year.JOE BIDEN: This may delay it a month or so‚ I';m not sure of that. I dont- we don';t know what the Fed is going to do for certain.SCHULZE: Whit‚ that first interest rate cut by the Federal Reserve had been expected in June‚ but after today';s report‚ most analysts aren';t predicting it will happen until September. And that';s assuming that the inflation picture improves by then. Whit.JOHNSON: All right‚ concerning news there. Elizabeth‚ thank you.CBS Evening News also went in-depth‚ depicting with greater detail how consumers are feeling the pinch. Correspondent Jo-Ling Kent tried to find bright spots in a report that offered none‚ and ended her report by also nixing the idea of a summer rate cut. (Click expand to view full transcript)CBS EVENING NEWSWEDNESDAY‚ APRIL 10th‚ 2024:NORAH ODONNELL: Now to some breaking news. Wall Street took a hit‚ with all three major indexes finishing the day in the red. The Dow fell more than 400 points after the Labor Department reported a higher-than-expected spike in inflation. The Consumer Price Index for March rose at an annual rate of 3.5%‚ and that is the biggest jump in six months. In tonights ";Money watch‚"; CBS';s Jo-Ling Kent shows us how consumers are feeling the pinch.JO-LING KENT: For the third straight month‚ prices have gone up more than expected‚ from the rising cost of car insurance and repairs.So how much are you paying at the grocery store every week?TIKTOKER 1: Do you know how much one of these cost? Two freaking dollars.TIKTOKER 2: This was $200.TIKTOKER 3: Are we supposed to skip the power bill this month so we can buy groceries or the mortgage?KENT: Before the pandemic of all of these groceries‚ about 30 items‚ cost $100 on average. Now five years later‚ according to Nielsen IQ‚ all this cost 33% more‚ meaning youd have to skip about ten items. Like chicken‚ bread‚ milk‚ and bananas‚ to make your $100 budget.Five years ago versus today‚ the difference is remarkable. Is that normal?CARMAN ALLISON: Oh‚ goodness‚ it';s not normal at all. That is why consumers are really‚ really scrutinizing their behaviors because‚ you know‚ prices are leveling off‚ but they are leveling off at these record high levels.KENT: Higher gas prices and rent also helped push inflation up 3.5% over the last year. Also more expensive‚ baby food and formula spiking nearly 10%. Eldercare up over 14%. And veterinary care jumping almost 10%. President Biden responding today.JOE BIDEN: We are better situated than we were when we took office. Where inflation was skyrocketing. And we have a plan to deal with it.KENT: But until then‚ shoppers continue to cut corners where they can.ALLISON: We ask Americans‚ have you changed your behavior? And 87% of Americans have said yes to that. We may be seeing more‚ you know‚ white meat on the barbecue than red meat this summer because beef prices have gone up 9%. Everybody';s been impacted by this. There is no way you can get around it.KENT: The good news here is wage growth last month did outpace inflation‚ but this March inflation number is the biggest annual jump in six months‚ and it really makes it very unlikely that the Federal Reserve will lower interest rates any time soon. Norah.The grim news‚ with few silver linings‚ was simply too much to suppress outright. The networks‚ compelled to cover the story‚ did so reluctantly and after burning the story beneath weather reports and actual local crime stories.

NBCs Late Night host Seth Meyers brought out the bleep button on Wednesdays show to angrily respond to a Fox Business segment suggesting Donald Trumps federalist stance on abortion makes him a moderate or even pro-choice‚ as he labeled radio host Mark Simone a piece of [bleep] and a mother[bleep].Meyers introduced the clip of Simone on Kudlow by declaring that [Trump';s] allies think they can trick everyone into thinking he';s a moderate on abortion by lying and claiming he';ll leave it up to the states‚ which he won';t.In the clip‚ Simone responded to Trumps position by arguing‚ That makes him the pro-choice candidate‚ leave it up to the states.An angry Meyers replied‚ This brings us to astatement were calling Seth triesreally hard not to lose his[bleep].Trump is the pro-choicecandidate?Are you out of your [bleep]?I';m sorry‚ I believe you aremistaken.Your statements are misleading‚and you are failing to providean accurate good faith analysisof the facts.You';re inverting the truth forpolitical purposes andgaslighting your viewers bygrossly misrepresenting thedetails of the situation.Meyers continued‚ Let me put it another way: you';re a [extended bleep]piece of [bleep].Well‚ I failed!This has been Seth tries reallyhard not to lose his [bleep].";Fox Business is not the first and certainly wont be the last news program to discuss the political ramifications of abortion stances‚ but Meyers was not done ranting‚ Also‚ let me just say‚ so coolto watch a couple dudes discussan issue that literally hurtswomen as to whether or not itwill hurt another dude‚Donald Trump‚ at the ballot box.Introducing a second clip of the segment‚ Meyers added‚ That guys a right-wing radio host named Mark Simone. Also‚ he suggested in that interview that if women have to flee their states and travel tens or hundreds of miles to access life-saving medical care‚ it';s no big deal.In the clip‚ Simone proclaimed‚ If you had to travel to another state to get an abortion‚ it';s not the worst thing in the world. Hopefully this is a very rare occurrence in your life‚ once in your life‚ maybe you would do it. Buying a bus ticket to go somewhere to get it is not the worst thing in the world.In full rant mode‚ Meyers huffed‚ Then you take the bus‚ mother[bleep]. You take the bus. How about every time someone has to take the bus to get abortion care out of state‚ we make Mark Simone wait in line for a Greyhound at the port authority. Dude would run out that day and buy a t-shirt that says My body‚ my choice.";With his Closer Look segments‚ Meyers likes to portray himself as the thinking mans comedian who uses elaborate metaphors and analogies to make a point‚ but Wednesdays show was just a bitter‚ angry man yelling into the wind.Here is a transcript for the April 10-taped show:NBC Late Night with Seth Meyers4/11/202412:46 AM ETSETH MEYERS: But Trump and his allies thinkthey can trick everyone intothinking he';s a moderate onabortion by lying and claiminghe';ll leave it up to the states‚which he won';t.MARK SIMONE: This issue does not hurtDonald Trump.He';s not against abortion.He';s actually okay withabortion.He wants that 15-week limit‚perfectly reasonable.LARRY KUDLOW: Well‚ wait‚ he didn';t say 15weeks‚ that';s not quoting.Yesterday he had a differenttake.He didn';t say 15 weeks.He said‚ let the states decide.SIMONE: Well‚ that KUDLOW: a point I happen to agree with‚by the way‚ wholeheartedly.But I can';t pin 15 weeks on himbecause it';s not what he said.SIMONE: Okay‚ but that makes him thepro-choice candidate‚ leave itup to the states.MEYERS: This brings us to astatement were calling ";Seth triesreally hard not to lose his[bleep].";Trump is the pro-choicecandidate?Are you out of your [bleep]?I';m sorry‚ I believe you aremistaken.Your statements are misleading‚and you are failing to providean accurate good faith analysisof the facts.You';re inverting the truth forpolitical purposes andgaslighting your viewers bygrossly misrepresenting thedetails of the situation.Let me put it another way: you';re a [extended bleep]piece of [bleep].Well‚ I failed!This has been ";Seth tries reallyhard not to lose his [bleep].";Also‚ let me just say‚ so coolto watch a couple dudes discussan issue that literally hurtswomen as to whether or not itwill hurt another dude‚Donald Trump‚ at the ballot box.That guys a right-wing radiohost named Mark Simone.Also‚ he suggested in that interview that if women have toflee their states and traveltens or hundreds of miles toaccess life-saving medical care‚it';s no big deal.SIMONE: If you had to travel toanother state to get anabortion‚ it';s not the worstthing in the world.Hopefully this is a very rareoccurrence in your life‚ once inyour life‚ maybe you would do it.Buying a bus ticket to gosomewhere to get it is not theworst thing in the world.MEYERS: Then you take the bus‚mother[bleep].You take the bus. How about every time someone hasto take the bus to get abortioncare out of state‚ we makeMark Simone wait in line for aGreyhound at the port authority.Dude would run out that day andbuy a t-shirt that says ";Mybody‚ my choice.";

ABCs millionaire moderator‚ Whoopi Goldberg was in a foul mood during Thursdays edition of The View because former White House Chief of Staff Ron Klain dared to say President Biden should focus his reelection message on issues that average Americans were concerned with such as inflation and high grocery prices. She repeatedly shouted down any attempt to suggest he had the power to curtail inflation but then went on about how expensive her commute was as if Biden could deal with it.According to big brain Goldberg‚ who recently couldnt remember which years former President Trump ran for office‚ Biden wasnt responsible for inflation at grocery stores; rather‚ it was the stores just raising prices for the hell of it. I think our kvetch is not with him for grocery prices. Im mad at the grocery stores‚ because if all of the things have been open why are you still raising prices? she shouted.Faux conservative Alyssa Farah Griffin tried to argue that prices were the top concern of the undecided voters shes spoken to and that there was a way for Biden to address it‚ but Goldberg repeatedly shouted over her‚ suggesting if those people knew civics as she did theyd know they were wrong (Click expand):FARAH GRIFFIN: What I hear when I talk to undecideds is the grocery bills are--GOLDBERG (interrupting): Yes‚ but if the people knew civics they would know that is not his -- FARAH GRIFFIN: There are absolutely things that Biden can do to address it and grocery prices have jumped 25 percent over four years.JOY BEHAR: What can he do?[Crosstalk]FARAH GRIFFIN: Hang on real quick. This is the reality. Its the most immediate and repetitive thing. You have to buy groceries every week.GOLDBERG (interrupting): We get all that. But the question is what do you want him to do? What can he do?FARAH GRIFFIN: He can challenge the major grocery chains if he wants to. There are things that he could do with that he could encourage the Fed to do.Goldberg insisted Biden was doing stuff hes supposed to be doing. Hes doing what hes supposed to be doing‚ but never explained what that stuff was.Farah Griffin tried to reiterate that Americans are spending 11 percent of their income on food but Goldberg interjected with her own problems. I';m an American. I';m a little pissed off about over-the-price stuff‚ but Ill tell you what I';m really pissed off about‚ she shrieked. I wanted to talk about why the people in New Jersey now are facing not just getting the prices raised on the buses and trainsSuggesting that Biden was in a damned-if-you-do-damned-if-you-dont scenario‚ Goldberg argued that he was just a busy guy getting pulled in different directions:Listen‚ he can do what he did with the gas people. He can do everything but then he';s not going to be able to take care of what he needs to do in Israel‚ then he';s not taking care -- I mean‚ it';s like‚ there';s a lot of stuff to do but we get it. We know there';s a lot to do.Backing up Goldberg through all of this‚ was staunchlyracistandanti-Semiticco-host‚ Sunny Hostin(thedescendant of slave owners)‚ who was blaming the high prices on grocery stores. Without evidence‚ she accused all grocery stores of price gauging.Maybe we just need corporations like these grocery stores to be good corporate citizens and stop gouging! Stop trying to make money off of our backs! she shouted.A little over a year ago‚ Hostin bragged that she hadnt gone grocery shopping in years‚ ever since the COVID pandemic.The transcript is below. Click ";expand"; to read:ABCs The ViewApril 11‚ 202411:05:49 a.m. Eastern()WHOOPI GOLDBERG: I think our kvetch is not with him for grocery prices. Im mad at the grocery stores‚ because if all of the things have been open why are you still raising prices?()11:07:07 a.m. EasternALYSSA FARAH GRIFFIN: What I hear when I talk to undecideds is the grocery bills are--GOLDBERG (interrupting): Yes‚ but if the people knew civics they would know that is not his --FARAH GRIFFIN: There are absolutely things that Biden can do to address it and grocery prices have jumped 25 percent over four years.JOY BEHAR: What can he do?[Crosstalk]FARAH GRIFFIN: Hang on real quick. This is the reality. Its the most immediate and repetitive thing. You have to buy groceries every week.GOLDBERG (interrupting): We get all that. But the question is what do you want him to do? What can he do?FARAH GRIFFIN: He can challenge the major grocery chains if he wants to. There are things that he could do with that he could encourage the Fed to do.SUNNY HOSTIN: Challenge how? Can he take them to court?BEHAR: So far‚ we';re in a free country.GOLDBERG: Let her answer.FARAH GRIFFIN: There are a number of things to be done but to say‚ I wash my hands‚ it';s not my problem you cant afford groceries.HOSTIN: But what can he do? Can he take them to court because theyre price gauging?FARAH GRIFFIN: No‚ it';s not a matter of taking them to court.[Crosstalk]SARA HAINES: I see what youre saying. Even campaigning on things like that helps. Because I think also making room for immigration would be helpful here. One of the things‚ if you';re looking towards the election if you want to grab people and get them voting‚ immigration is one of the most agreed upon problems.GOLDBERG: But here';s the problem‚ he does -- He goes and he takes care of what he';s supposed to be taking care of‚ which is the bridge and how to open just hold on.FARAH GRIFFIN: I don';t think that';s what Ron Klain was saying. He was talking about him going to [crosstalk] infrastructure projects [Crosstalk]GOLDBERG: But here';s the thing‚ you know‚ people are bitching if he does stuff‚ they bitch if he doesn';t do stuff. Listen‚ hes doing stuff hes supposed to be doing. Hes doing what hes supposed to be doing. But I';m pissed off.[Crosstalk]FARAH GRIFFIN: Americans are spending 11 percent of their income on food‚ the most GOLDBERG (interrupting): I';m an American. I';m a little pissed off about over-the-price stuff‚ but Ill tell you what I';m really pissed off about. Im really pissed out that people seem to think that the American citizen is a wallet where you can just get your hand in through. That';s what I wanted to talk about. I wanted to talk about why the people in New Jersey now are facing not just getting the prices raised on the buses and trainsHOSTIN: Congestion pricing.GOLDBERG: No‚ no‚ this is on the Jersey side.HAINES: Yeah‚ I know‚ but it';s all part of the same --GOLDBERG: But the congestion pricing isn';t making me as nuts as --FARAH GRIFFIN: I just want to underscore. I think it';s a fair point. There';s not one box he can check and suddenly grocery prices go down. That would be ridiculous to suggest but what is being told by advisers is‚ You need to speak to what people are feeling. You need to speak to this very real reality. I make a lot of money. I put a red onion back the other day because it was $4.99. That';s ridiculous!GOLDBERG: Yeah‚ but‚ again‚ he can talk -- Listen‚ he can do what he did with the gas people. He can do everything but then he';s not going to be able to take care of what he needs to do in Israel‚ then he';s not taking care -- I mean‚ it';s like‚ there';s a lot of stuff to do but we get it. We know there';s a lot to do.My kvetch with him is Listen‚ Ron‚ if there';s something you want him to talk about‚ let';s say‚ listen‚ we know you';re doing all this stuff but when you say‚ I don';t want him to be talking about bridges anymore‚ it sounds to people who live and need that bridge like they';re being dismissive.HOSTIN: Maybe we just need corporations like these grocery stores to be good corporate citizens and stop gouging! Stop trying to make money off of our backs!()

In footage first aired Wednesday night on Fox Newss Jesse Watters PrimeTime‚ Fox Business correspondent Hillary Vaughn doggedly ran down Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) earlier in the day over video from a Dearborn‚ Michigan event inside her district which featured chants of death to America and death to Israel.Not surprisingly‚ the far-left‚ raging anti-Semite declined to condemn the chants and instead accused Vaughn and her Fox colleagues of being Islamphobic people engaging in racist tropes.The footage began with Vaughn only being able to call out to Tlaib before the Michigan Democrat shouted back‚ I dont talk to Fox News! I dont talk to Fox News!Vaughn nonetheless asked her question as a staff member tried to move Vaughn out of the way and Tlaib reiterating she wouldnt speak to Fox: At a rally in your district‚ people were chanting death to America. Do you condemn?When Tlaib again said she wouldnt talk to Fox News‚ Vaughn asked again why she wouldnt condemn chants of death to America.Clearly flustered‚ Tlaib dodged the question by claiming she doesnt talk to people that use racist tropes even though its a known fact it was indeed chanted and pointing that out isnt racist.Why cant you just say whether or not you condemn people chanting death to America‚ Vaughn wondered‚ to which Tlaib played a broken record‚ [b]ecause I dont talk to Fox News.As the first elevator Tlaib and a staffer had rushed to hide in wouldnt open‚ they rushed to try another close by. Vaughn kept following them and tweaked her question to reflect Tlaibs screeching: Why are you afraid to talk to Fox?Tlaibs answer sounded like it was curated by her friends at the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR): Fox News is not nice. Listen‚ using racist tropes towards my community is what Fox Tunes [sic] is about and I don';t talk to Fox News.Vaughn tried one last time: Is death to America racist? Is chanting death to America racist?Tlaib restated her position of ignoring Fox and‚ as she finally walked into an elevator‚ The Squad member reiterated her Fox smear and called the network Islamophobic: Im talking about your guyss racist tropes. You know‚ you guys are you guys know exactly what you do. And I know youre Islamophobic‚ but you guys gotta go deal with it on your own selves‚ not going to use me.This was not the first run-in between these two. For example‚ back on October 10‚ Vaughn chased Tlaib down and called out her silence on some of the most brutal atrocities committed by Hamas during their animalistic attacks in Israel on October 7.To see the relevant exchange from April 10‚ click expand.FNCs Jesse Watters PrimeTimeApril 10‚ 20248:25 p.m. EasternHILLARY VAUGHN: Congresswoman Tlaib CONGRESSWOMAN RASHIDA TLAIB (D-MI): I dont talk to Fox News! I dont talk to Fox News!TLAIB STAFF MEMBER: Excuse me.VAUGHN: At a rally TLAIB STAFF MEMBER: Sorry.VAUGHN: in your district TLAIB: Im not talking to Fox News.VAUGHN: people were chanting death to America. Do you condemn?TLAIB: Do not talk to Fox News.VAUGHN: But do you condemn chants of death to America?TLAIB: I dont talk to people that use racist tropes.VAUGHN: Why cant you just say whether or not you condemn TLAIB: Because I dont talk to Fox News.VAUGHN: people chanting death to America?TLAIB: [Inaudible]VAUGHN: Why are you afraid to talk to Fox?TLAIB: Fox News is not nice. Listen‚ using racist tropes towards my community is what Fox Tunes [sic] is about and I don';t talk to Fox News.VAUGHN: Is death to America TLAIB: [Inaudible]VAUGHN: racist?TLAIB: never speak to Fox News.VAUGHN: Is chanting death to America racist?TLAIB: No [inaudible] Im talking about your guyss racist tropes. You know‚ you guys are you guys know exactly what you do. And I know youre Islamophobic‚ but you guys gotta go deal with it on your own selves‚ not going to use me.

National Co-Chair for the 2024 Biden Presidential Campaign Rep. Jim Clyburn wasnt expected to be blindsided by bad news in friendly territory.During the April 10 edition ofMorning Joe‚ co-host Mika Brzezinski had to cut off Clyburns rosy message about the state of the Biden economy to get an update from reality. Clyburn complained about disinformation and misrepresentation on social media in his uninformed response to a question about the Biden economy. Then‚ after seemingly nervously beginning her statement with Ill validate that‚ Brzezinski covered the breaking news: The consumer price index increased at a faster than expected pace last month‚ a signal that inflation remains stubbornly high.To make matters worse‚ Clyburn had to sit through a segment of CNBC anchor Andrew Ross Sorkin discussing this horrible news. Sorkin speculated that theyre throwing a party in Mar-a-Lago. Sorkin added‚ The truth is that right now inflation has now moved in the opposite direction. So‚ its going to be harder for the administration to make the argument around this inflation trendline‚ before opening the spigot with further bad news‚ [F]rankly‚ mortgage rates are not going to be coming down‚ credit card rates are not going to be coming down.Sorkin went on‚ suggesting that It has been a shock‚ and I think a surprise for many just how hot this number has turned out to be.Few were more surprised than Clyburn.However‚ Clyburns humiliation was not just the result of bad timing. It was well deserved. His Bidenomics talking points were obviously false even before the March numbers made them look even more ridiculous.Brzezinski had asked Clyburn about struggling Americans who feel gaslit while showing a graphic that gave former President Donald Trump a 9.3 percent advantage with key undecided voters (Undecided voters in PA‚ MI and WI on the topic: Better for you and your familys finances).Clyburn started off weak‚ telling Brzezinski that 401ks are not about peoples everyday lives‚ before following up with an statement favorably comparing current inflation to inflation earlier in Bidens presidency. Clyburn confidently told Brzezinski that the inflation rates are down and peoples incomes are up. Later‚ Clyburn would add‚ Although we see the prices at the stores costing more money‚ people are in fact earning greater incomes.Morning Joeand Sorkin made Clyburns inflation point look outrageous‚ but his point on wages isnt true either. Real wages have gonedownunder Biden. American median weekly real earnings havedeclinedfrom $373 in the first quarter of 2021 to $371 in the fourth quarter of 2023.Conservatives are under attack!Contact ABC News at (818) 460-7477‚ CBS News at (212) 975-3247 and NBC News at (212) 664-6192 and demand they tell the truth about the Bidenomics disaster.

Every White House team seeks to pressure the media into more favorable coverage. It';s only natural to discover Team Biden can have their way in influencing liberal operations to edit things they';ve already posted. But it usually happens on the ";down low‚"; where there';s no proven connection.Thomas Catenacci at FoxNews.com reported on Thursday that Snopes.com changed a rating on of their fact checks from ";Mixture"; to ";False"; in an article headlined ";Is Biden Administration Banning Gas Stoves Over Climate Change Concerns?";Nur Ibrahim of Snopes noted Richard Trumka Jr.‚ a member of the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC)‚ said such a ban was ";on the table.";";This is a hidden hazard‚"; Trumka told Bloomberg at the time. ";Any option is on the table. Products that cant be made safe can be banned.";A month earlier‚ Trumka said regulating gas stoves needs to be a priority ";whether it';s drastically reducing emissions or banning gas stoves entirely"; because of their climate and health impacts‚ CBS News reported.But Snopes‚ which originally gave its ";mixture"; rating as a result of Trumka';s statements‚ changed the rating to ";false‚"; stating the CPSC is ";not currently considering a ban on gas stoves."; Snopes'; updated article included additional comments from the CPSC and downplayed Trumka';s earlier statement.However‚ Snopes only altered its article after pressure from the CPSC to do so‚ according to emails exchanged between CPSC and White House communications officials and obtained by watchdog group Functional Government Initiative (FGI) through an information request.";Sent over tough letter to this writer yesterday when the initial claim was rated as ';mixed‚';"; CPSC communications director Pamela Rucker Springs wrote in an email to White House assistant press secretary Michael Kikukawa Jan. 11‚ 2023‚ linking to the updated Snopes fact check.Kikukawa responded enthusiastically‚ saying the alteration would be ";so helpful going forward.";Snopes then tweeted it was ";simply false"; to presume that they changed it due to CPSC ";pressure."; It';s obvious that they received an angry call‚ and then changed it. They just hope nobody connects the dots.Jason Cohen at the Daily Caller (who interned with us) reported earlier thatUSA Today altereda Monday headline on Donald Trumps current abortion stance after the Bidens campaign blasted the outlets coverage.Trump said on Monday that states should craft their own abortion laws‚ which many‚ including USA Today‚ interpreted as opposition to a federal ban on killing the unborn. But the Biden campaign pressured the media with predictions Trump would end up signing a national ban.Trump kept his word to overturn Roe in his last term‚ and he will not rest until he has banned abortion across the entire country. Period‚ Biden campaign Deputy Communications Director Brooke Goren said on the call. We all know this and the coverage needs to reflect it. These are the same people who are enraged when Republicans point out they support abortion at any time for any reason up until birth across America.USA Todays initial headline on David Jackson';s report was The will of the people: Trump opposes national abortion ban; says states should decide. Goren called thatparticularly egregiously false.About two hours after the conference call‚ it was changed to Donald Trump says states should decide abortion policy‚ avoids talk of a national ban without noting the change with an editors note.Mediaite first reported the change.Our mission is to report the facts as accurately as possible‚ a USA Today spokesperson told the Daily Caller News Foundation. As part of our routine editorial process with breaking news‚ headline updates are not uncommon. In this instance‚ the headline was updated to more precisely reflect the story.Updates aren';t uncommon. What';s uncommon is learning how Team Biden pressures ";more precise reflections."; This is about a partisan pro-abortion prediction of what Trump would do‚ not a fact.

On Thursday before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution and Limited Government‚ former CBS News correspondent Catherine Herridge emerged to give her first set of extended public remarks about her sudden firing from CBS News and what she would describe as a journalistic rape and the crossing of a red line that...should never be crossed again in the (temporary) seizure of her files that contained sensitive details about sources.Joined by Sinclairs Sharyl Attkisson‚ SAG-AFTRAs Mary Cavallaro‚ and the Knight First Amendment Institutes Nadine Farid Johnson‚ Herridge spoke out in favor of the bipartisan PRESS Act‚ which would largely protect journalists from being forced by the government to disclose the identity of their sources.Herridge has particular interest as‚ in addition to sudden unemployment‚ she was recently held in contempt and ordered (pending a stay) to divulge a source relating to a story from her Fox News tenure or face a $500/day fine.Herridge largely took the high road‚ such as in her opening statement thanking the House for taking the time to focus again on the importance of protecting reporter sources and the vital safeguards provided by the PRESS Act.She explained what the contempt case has done to her family and the impact itd have on (actual) journalism (click expand):One of our children recently asked me if I would go to jail‚ if we would lose our house‚ and if we would lose our familys savings to protect my reporting sources. I wanted to answer that‚ in this United States where we say we value democracy and the role of a vibrant and free press‚ that it was impossible‚ but I could not offer that assurance. The bipartisan PRESS Act‚ which came out of this House Committee‚ would put it into the sort of legal jeopardy that I had experienced firsthand in the federal courts. And without the legislation‚ more journalists will run into the uncertainty of the contempt gauntlet in the future. This legislation will provide protections for every working journalist in the United States‚ now and for the next generation. The legislation provides strong protections at the federal level for reporters and their sources. It would block litigants and federal governments from prying into reporters files‚ except when theres imminent threat of violence‚ including terrorism and in defamation cases. At the state level‚ similar rules are already in place at the state level to protect press freedom. It is my sincere hope the passage of the PRESS Act will provide similar protections at the federal level. I hope I am the last journalist who has to spin two years in the federal courts fighting to protect my confidential sources. My current situation arises from a privacy act lawsuit. I am only a witness in the case. It is not common for these cases to reach the stage of holding a reporter in contempt. But when such cases happen‚ they have profound consequences‚ impacting every journalist in the United States. Forcing a reporter to dispose confidential source would have a crippling effect on investigative journalism because‚ without reliable assurances of confidentiality‚ sources will not come forward. The First Amendment provides protections for the press because an informed electorate is at the foundation of our democracy. If confidential sources are not protected‚ I fear investigative journalism is dead. Each day‚ I feel the weight of that responsibility. As you know‚ I was held in contempt of court for upholding the basic journalistic principle of maintaining the pledge of confidentiality to my sources.Acknowledging this and losing your job gives you clarity‚ Herridge said its solidified the importance of protecting confidential sources with some having reached out when her CBS files were seized and were concerned that‚ by working with me to expose government corruption and misconduct‚ they would be identified and exposed.Despite the fact she did receive her files‚ she added this decision to receive my reporting records crossed a red line that I believe should never be crossed again by any media organization in the future‚ especially because such legal threats and fines would be crushing for smaller and independent journalists.For her part‚ Attkisson tied in the host of stories shes covered‚ the Obama administration spying on her‚ and need for confidential sources to the Deep States unrepentant penchant for targeting those they perceive to be enemies (click expand):.@SharylAttkisson';s full statement during the House @JudiciaryGOP on the free press:In decades of reporting nationally at CNN‚ CBS‚ PBS‚ and for the last nine years on my tv show Full Measure‚ countless new stories that I broke or facets of them could not even reported without pic.twitter.com/GD0P1WeIxI Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 11‚ 2024Herridge refused to throw CBS under the bus for letting her go. In answering questions from Congressman Tom McClintock (R-CA) about whether if CBS actions were influenced by the government in any way‚ Herridge declined to answer as shes not someone who is known to offer speculation.Attkisson‚ however‚ wadded in with the reality government interference in the liberal media happens everyday with [m]embers of committees‚ heads of committees‚ members of Congress and the White House having called the bureau in Washington‚ D.C.‚ contacts that they have‚ editors and managers up in New York to try to shape our coverage.Herridge did open up when Congresswoman Harriett Hageman (R-WY) astutely invited her to expand on why government coercion to reveal sources is dangerous (and in particular for stories aiming to hold those in power to account).At one point‚ Herridge said she hasnt lost a nights sleep about my decision to protect my confidential sources and taking anonymity off the table severely decreases the likelihood whistleblowers will reveal government wrongdoing (click the tweet to read the full thread):@RepHageman: Ms. Herridge‚ how fundamental to reporting is the protection of your sources?Catherine Herridge (@C__Herridge): Congresswoman‚ I have not lost a nights sleep about my decision to protect my confidential sources. That is the core of who I am as a journalist. I am pic.twitter.com/jNgg5H0291 Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 11‚ 2024A little later on and after Congressman Kelly Armstrong (R-ND) walked Attkisson through many of her major‚ career-defining scoops and the necessity to have sources‚ Herridge told Jordan her career hasnt been about focusing just on‚ say‚ the Biden family‚ but call[ing] balls and strikes and the seizure of her files was not my experience in the other two networks I worked at or with my colleagues at CBS News.When the network of Walter Cronkite seizes the reporting files‚ including confidential source information‚ that is an attack on investigative journalism‚ she added.Jordan laid out summation of what seems to happen to journalists who dare to be critical of the government‚ which is a pattern in which all kinds of strange things happen to them‚ whether its suddenly losing ones job to having files seized to communications surveilled.Thats scary...[Y]ou talk about a chilling effect on the First Amendment‚ I dont know how we could be more chilly‚ he said.Herridge became more pointed:Wherever you work‚ if this happened to you‚ its an attack on free press. Its an attack on the First Amendment. It makes it more challenging for reporters to work in the future. That disrupts the free flow of information to the public. They call it journalism a profession for a reason because its about an informed electorate‚ and its a cornerstone of our democracy. I can only speak for myself. When my records were seized‚ I felt it was a journalistic rape.Herridge further opened up to Subcommittee Chairman and Congressman Chip Roy (R-TX) about pressure she felt at CBS when covering Biden family corruption after Roy observed there was [n]othing to indicate that there was a failure to perform your duties when CBS laid her off (click expand):HERRIDGE: Congressman‚ I think what you are asking me is whether I was terminated for for poor performance. I dont believe that my record would reflect that. I dont know what factors the CBS News executives considered when they terminated my position. There was tension over the Hunter Biden reporting and the Biden administration‚ but I cant speak for sure why I was let go.ROY: And you mentioned tension. You had been one of the the reporters certainly in what we might define as the mainstream media that was focusing intently on the Hunter Biden laptop‚ on the various facts surrounding the Biden family and the flow of money and all of those things involved with that. Is that correct?HERRIDGE: That is correct. For the full picture‚ though‚ I was also the reporter at CBS News who obtained the audiotape of former President Trump apparently bragging about the Iran classified documents at Mar-a-Lago‚ and I also exposed how 50 soldiers were denied the Purple Heart under the Trump administration in an effort to descalate after a ballistic missile attack in Iran. I Im someone who calls balls and strikes‚ Congressman. I just follow the facts where they lead. That has always been my calling card.ROY: When CBS let you go‚ was it around the time of you calling out the Trump administration or around the time that you were pursuing more of the Hunter Biden?HERRIDGE: Ah‚ I was let go a few days after the Special Counsel Robert Hur report into President Bidens handling of classified information.(....)ROY: In closing‚ can you just reiterate the extent of your belief of what this means for other journalists/ And you alluded to before‚ smaller journalists without the protection of the kind of corporate structure that weve got with Fox backing you up from your previous reporting.HERRIDGE: I just dont think any journalists could withstand the threat of significant and crippling financial sanctions. They may not have a former employer or a current employer whos in position to mount a vigorous or costly defense. I think its a very dangerous period for journalism. The PRESS Act would close the legal cap in the system‚ this ambiguity Ive had to deal with for two years and I want to emphasize. This is not about a single journalist. Its not about a single-story. Its not about a single network. What happens in my case‚ the passage of the PRESS Act is going to impact every journalism journalist working in this room and its going to impact every journalist in the United States and for the next generation to come. If theres anything I can accomplish in my career as a journalist‚ its going to get this over the finish line. I feel this with every core of my being.Herridge showed more of her cards to Congressman Dan Bishop (R-NC) as he closed out the hearing‚ including an admission about the bias she saw at CBS:Fascinating exchange at the end of the House hearing on the free press in which Catherine Herridge emphasizes real journalism must include diverse points of view and‚ while at CBS‚ bosses limited points of view and voices that made her uncomfortable (1/3):@RepDanBishop: pic.twitter.com/KPP4a6ScR0 Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 11‚ 2024The left often parodies conservatives and Republicans as anti-media‚ but like most things out of the so-called fact-checkers‚ it couldnt be any further from the truth.Click the tweet to see a thread containing the opening statement from Roy:.@ChipRoyTX: Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press and that cannot be limited without being lost. Those words were true when Thomas Jefferson wrote them in 1786 and they are still true today. The First Amendment to the Constitution guarantees freedom of the press and pic.twitter.com/oYqv4BE0Zt Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 11‚ 2024Jordan sounded similar tunes‚ noting:[i]ts not just the press thats under attack in recent years‚ but [e]very single liberty we enjoy under the First Amendments been assaulted in the last couple years:.@Jim_Jordan: Its not just the press thats under attack. Every single liberty we enjoy under the First Amendments been assaulted in the last couple years. I mean‚ you think about it your right to practice your faith‚ your right to assemble‚ your right to petition the pic.twitter.com/9hwMjY824s Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 11‚ 2024To see the relevant transcript from the April 11 hearing‚ click here.

Click to Skip Ahead About The Blissful DogOverviewKey FeaturesIs It A Good Value?FAQOur Experience Our Final VerdictWe give The Blissful Dog No H2O Spray Pet Shampoo a rating of 4.8 out of 5 stars. Effectiveness: 4.6/5Scent: 4.8/5Ingredients: 4.9/5Value: 4.9/5 Check Price on The Blissful DogFor most pet owners‚ the trickiest part of owning a pet is grooming them. Have a dog that needs to sit still so you can brush them? Theyre wiggling away. Trying to clip their nails or brush their teeth? They think its terrifying. Need to dunk your dog in a bathtub full of water? Absolute torture!Bath time can be the hardest task to accomplish with a dog‚ especially ones that are already nervous‚ older‚ or just hate getting wet. If you cant get your dog in your tub at home but dont want to drag them to the groomers every time they roll in something outside‚ The Blissful Dogs No H2O Spray was made for you!About The Blissful DogThe Blissful Dog was started by Kathy Dannel Vitcak who‚ for over twenty years‚ bred and showed Top Winning French Bulldogs. When there was nothing available to be used to moisturize the Frenchies noses‚ Kathy took matters into her own hands. She began with Nose Butter‚ then expanded to more dog products like Paw Butter‚ Boo Boo Butter‚ and more!Every tin‚ tube‚ whatever container their products come in‚ is still individually handcrafted by one of The Blissful Dog team members. The Blissful Dog knows our dogs are so important and make sure to put the same amount of care into every product to help every dogs health and well-being. They are dedicated to helping your dog look and feel their best physically‚ emotionally‚ and mentally.What Is No H2O Spray Pet Shampoo?No H2O Spray is a spray product made by The Blissful Dog that is exactly what it sounds like! It is designed to simplify bath time and even remove the bathtub aspect from the experience. It is essentially a waterless shampoo to be sprayed on your dog‚ rubbed in‚ and used to freshen them back up in between proper baths. This product isnt meant to fully take the place of baths but to lengthen the time in between and help de-stink your dog. Since theres no bathtub or water involved‚ this product is easy to use and great for messy puppies‚ nervous dogs‚ senior dogs‚ or any dog that just hates getting a bath.The spray includes ingredients such as water‚ a mild coconut-derived cleanser‚ aloe‚ citric acid‚ and some fragrance. It is a non-drying formula that is also irritation and alcohol-free‚ with a scent of soft mimosa.Overview Check Price on The Blissful DogPricingThe Blissful Dog offers several sizes of their No H2O Spray so that whether youre just trying it out‚ or need a jug of it in your household‚ theyve got you covered. The 4 oz bottle is priced at $11.95‚ the 8 oz bottle at 17.95‚ the 16 oz bottle at 27.95‚ and the gallon at 72.95. Its good to note that the Blissful Dog does have free shipping within the USA and free priority shipping for orders over $50 in the USA.ContentsWhen I received my package from The Blissful Dog‚ I was pleasantly surprised to see the contents! It had my bottle of No H2O Spray‚ but also a special Blissful Dog bath towel for me to use. I hadnt seen any images of a towel in the product imagery on the website‚ so it was a fun surprise. The towel is super cute with their logo on it‚ so you dont mix up which towels are for your face and which are for your dog. It also contained a little packet with more information on The Blissful Dog and a thank you notecard‚ which I always think is such a sweet touch.How To UseThe Blissful Dogs No H2O Spray Pet Shampoo is so easy to use! You simply give your bottle a little shake‚ and spray down your dogs spine. Go from the back of the neck‚ all the way down to the base of the tail to spray the length of your furry friend. Then rub the product in a little bit with your hands‚ or with a towel. You can also apply the product to the towel first and go over their coat that way if preferred.ReturnsThe Blissful Dog wants to leave all customers happy and ecstatic with their order. If you are displeased with your order‚ they want to make it right! They accept returns and exchanges and will work with you to make you happy and therefore offer an unlimited 90-day return policy.In SummaryPros No tub involved Quick and easy spray application Good smell No stress for people or dogsCons Gallon option needs to be transferred into a spray bottleKey Features Check Price on The Blissful DogIngredientsOne of the best parts of The Blissful Dogs No H2O Spray Pet Shampoo is that it has a short ingredient list of all-natural good stuff‚ as they say. All the ingredients are listed on their website. The list includes water‚ mild coconut-derived cleanser‚ aloe‚ citric acid‚ a soft fragrance‚ and a few more. This is a product with fewer ingredients in it and better ingredients for your pup.Quick and EasyThe Blissful Dogs No H2O Spray is great because it is incredibly quick and easy to use. You simply spray down your dogs back and rub the product in. Even the most uncooperative dogs could probably handle this spray for the few seconds it takes to apply! With a few treats as well‚ it would be super easy to practice some cooperative care and even get your dog to enjoy the spray bottle coming out.Is The No H2O Spray Pet Shampoo a Good Value?Waterless shampoos for dogs come in quite a range‚ from several being priced at $8‚ to more options being priced around the $22 range (when looking at 8-ounce bottles). The Blissful Dogs No H2O Spray Pet Shampoo falls in-between‚ at $17.95. There are cheaper options that can be found than the one from The Blissful Dog‚ but with the small company attention the No H2O Shampoo gets‚ I feel more comfortable using it on my dog. Plus‚ a little of it goes a long way. Check Price on The Blissful DogFAQWhat is No H2O Spray Pet Shampoo?No H2O shampoo is a waterless shampoo. Its designed to make bath time easy because theres no bath! The No H2O Shampoo is a spray you can use to freshen up your pup.How do I use the shampoo?Thats easy! Since its a No H2O shampoo‚ theres no need to try to wrangle your pup into a bath or even get them wet. All you need to do is spray the shampoo on‚ and towel them offkind of like a dry shampoo a person would use! Spray your dog from the back of their neck‚ down their spine. Then‚ tousle the spray into the coat with your hands. Just make sure to avoid their eyes and take extra care by applying with a towel or paper towel if you are cleaning your pups face!Whats in the No H2O Spray Pet Shampoo?The Blissful Dog has the ingredients in the product listed out. The shampoo includes water‚ a mild coconut cleanser‚ aloe‚ a slight fragrance‚ and a few more ingredients. Always good to know what youre putting on your furry friend!Our Experience With The Blissful Dogs No H2O ShampooI know in my house‚ baths are pretty much out of the question when it comes to my nervous pup‚ Elo. It was such a miserable experience to pick him up and force him into a tub of water that he was clearly terrified of. Once he was in the bathtub‚ he would be scrambling around the whole time‚ trying to jump out. It was a two-person job‚ one person holding him‚ and the other trying to shampoo and wash him as fast as humanly possible. Without fail‚ this always resulted in everyone getting completely soaked and the humans getting some accidental scratches from panicked claws that were thrashing about.Since my dog is a rescue‚ hes pretty anxious and probably wasnt exposed to things like baths. Because of that lack of exposure‚ everything bath and grooming-related is a bit more difficult. Since I dont want to traumatize him by forcing him into the bathtub‚ he is typically taken to a groomer at our vets office so he can be helped by a professional. However‚ he doesnt go very often since he still hates getting bathed and going to the groomers. So‚ when I started hearing about waterless shampoos‚ I was super interested to learn more!The Blissful Dog caught my attention with how easy and fast their spray sounded to apply‚ and when my No H2O Spray box came‚ I had to try it out right away. Since I know Elo is startled by even the smallest of new things‚ I thought the sound of the bottle spritzing onto him might spook him away. Instead of spraying it directly onto him‚ I took a few steps away‚ sprayed my Blissful Dog towel‚ and ran that over his coat as if I were just giving him back scratches. I also used the corner of the towel to clean off his face‚ being very careful to avoid his eyes‚ mouth‚ and nose. Elo had no problem letting the towel rub the product into his fur to clean him up.Ive used this spray a few times after long days in the backyard sniffing‚ playdates‚ and trail walks. I love how hassle-free this spray is; theres no stress for me or for my dog. The application is super fast and can be done in less than five minutes. And at the end of the application‚ I was still dry and had a freshened-up pup who was happy and wagging instead of running away from me. Check Price on The Blissful DogConclusionOverall‚ The Blissful Dogs No H2O Spray Pet Shampoo was a hit. This product is a game-changer for wiggly puppies‚ senior dogs‚ nervous pups‚ or any dog who hates bath time. It only takes a couple of minutes and a few sprays down their spine to apply the No H2O shampoo. The spray definitely helps to lengthen the time that pups can go between baths and would help clean up and de-stink any dog!The post The Blissful Dog No H2O Spray Pet Shampoo Review 2024: Our Experts Opinion appeared first on Pet Keen.