Site has no Description

Source: "NEM-Truth-Videos" https://old.bitchute.com/video/9bu91jjr5uam

Electric car review. Electric Cars Have Been Shown to Cause Cancer, DIY and car review Scotty Kilmer. Electric car review. Worst electric cars to buy. Buying a new electric car. Buying a used electric car. Should I buy an electric car. How much does it cost to run an electric car. Why not to buy a electric car. The truth about owning an electric car. Car advice. DIY car repair with Scotty Kilmer, an auto mechanic for the last 54 years. ⬇️Scotty’s Top DIY Tools: 1. Bluetooth Scan Tool: http://amzn.to/2nfvmaD 2. Mid-Grade Scan Tool: https://amzn.to/33dKI0k 3. My Fancy (Originally $5,000) Professional Scan Tool: https://amzn.to/31khBXC 4. Cheap Scan Tool: https://amzn.to/2D8Tvae 5. Dash Cam (Every Car Should Have One): https://amzn.to/2YQW36t 6. Basic Mechanic Tool Set: https://amzn.to/2tEr6Ce 7. Professional Socket Set: http://amzn.to/2Bzmccg 8. Ratcheting Wrench Set: https://amzn.to/2BQjj8A 9. No Charging Required Car Jump Starter: https://amzn.to/2CthnUU 10. Battery Pack Car Jump Starter: http://amzn.to/2nrc6qR ⬇️Scotty’s Top DIY Tools: 1. Bluetooth Scan Tool: http://amzn.to/2nfvmaD 2. Cheap Scan Tool: https://amzn.to/2D8Tvae 3. Professional Socket Set: http://amzn.to/2Bzmccg 4. Wrench Set: http://amzn.to/2kmBaOU 5. No Charging Required Car Jump Starter: https://amzn.to/2CthnUU 6. Battery Pack Car Jump Starter: http://amzn.to/2nrc6qR ?Scotty Shirts and Merch ► https://goo.gl/pTAeca Subscribe and hit the notification bell! ► https://goo.gl/CFismN Scotty on Social: Facebook ► / scottymechanic Instagram ► / scotty_the_mechanic Twitter ► https://twitter.com/Scottymechanic?la... This is the people's automotive channel! The most honest and funniest car channel on YouTube. Never any sponsored content, just the truth about everything! Learn how to fix your car and how it works. Get a chance to show off your own car on Sundays. Or show off your own car mod on Wednesdays. Tool giveaways every Monday to help you with your own car projects. We have a new video every day! I've been an auto mechanic for the past 50 years and I'm here to share my knowledge with you. ►Here's our weekly video schedule: Monday: Tool giveaway Tuesday: Auto repair video Wednesday: Viewers car mod show off Thursday: Viewer Car Question Video AND Live Car Q&A Friday: Auto repair video Saturday: Second Live Car Q&A Sunday: Viewers car show off ►Second Daily Upload Every Afternoon of Live Car Q&A videos as well! As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. #savagescotty WITH THANKS TO:- https://www.youtube.com/@scottykilmer

In a time of increased frustration with our public school system, a 2nd grader is giving us someplace to channel our frustrations. In a hilarious video rant, a youngster named Taylor shared a story that has folks ready to go to the mat for her and her beloved, pink, perfect attendance pencil.Instagrammer @tabgeezy shared a video of her daughter telling the story of how she put her perfect attendance pencil—the pink one that she had legitimately earned—in the classroom box of pencils to be sharpened. But when she went to retrieve it from the sharpened pencils box, all she found were plain yellow pencils. That's because Lizzie—who, by the way, had not earned a perfect attendance pencil because she had gone to CANADA—was using it. And not only that, but Canada Lizzie then lost Taylor's pencil in her desk, and her teacher was no help.You have to hear Taylor tell it to understand why this travesty of justice has gone viral. See on Instagram If you think this pencil battle is of no consequence whatsoever, think again. People on Twitter got hold of the video, and folks are rallying behind Taylor as if that pink pencil is our democracy and Taylor and Lizzie are the House and Senate. If somebody ever takes my child\u2019s perfect attendance pencil which SHE earned cuz she didn\u2019t even go to Canada, the entire school getting shut down. — riley wuz here (@riley wuz here) 1580451908 IS THERE NO JUSTICE IN THE WORLD — Charlotte Clymer \ud83c\udff3\ufe0f\u200d\u26a7\ufe0f\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\udde6 (@Charlotte Clymer \ud83c\udff3\ufe0f\u200d\u26a7\ufe0f\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\udde6) 1580482234 "Lizzie" trendied on Twitter as people called out the little girl who went to CANADA and then dared to take Taylor's perfect attendance pencil. Me and the crew showing up to school the next day looking for Lizzie and getting to ride out for Taylor\u2019s Perfect Attendance Pencil https://twitter.com/_FemGod/status/1223105472393121793\u00a0\u2026pic.twitter.com/3Hw7ASVmpX — Matthew A. Cherry (@Matthew A. Cherry) 1580483395 All I am saying is that if Lizzy wanted a pink Perfect Attendance pencil then she shouldn't have gone to CANADA.\n\n#JusticeForThePencil — Gail Simone \ud83d\udc99\ud83d\udc9b (@Gail Simone \ud83d\udc99\ud83d\udc9b) 1580488889 There were some shout-outs to Taylor's classmate who understood what that pencil meant to her. shout out to reece who was the only one who understood the gravity of the situation. don't let me see lizzie in the streets! https://twitter.com/_FemGod/status/1223105472393121793\u00a0\u2026 — in charge of the girls (@in charge of the girls) 1580474444 But Taylor's teacher certainly wasn't getting any love. Me writing an email to my baby\u2019s teacher saying that messy ass Lizzie better come up with a perfect attendance pencil or she\u2019s going to be going back to Canadapic.twitter.com/ZbcjpwBvUr — \u2728La Bruja Buena\u2728 (@\u2728La Bruja Buena\u2728) 1580474199 Twitter's collective reaction even started getting its own GIFs. All of Twitter getting ready to go ask Lizzie, who was in Canada, about a certain pink perfect attendance pencilpic.twitter.com/xwIBRzYFF5 — Lana Del Gay (@Lana Del Gay) 1580485811 Twitter uniting to get her perfect attendance pencil back from Lizzie because she went to Canada and DID NOT earn it:pic.twitter.com/4U9qFgB6Jm — Sarah Guy (@Sarah Guy) 1580477370 People had so. many. feelings. about baby girl getting back her pencil, about the way her mom and teacher dismissed it as "just a pencil," and about poor little Lizzie who probably still doesn't understand what all the fuss is about.Why do we care so much? Adorableness aside, we're all a little burned out on politics and the methodical dismantling of our country's checks and balances, so maybe getting charged up over an adorable little girl's pencil injustice somehow feels cathartic. John Delaney dropped out of the race... Meh!\n\nThere\u2019s a Presidential impeachment... Yawn. \n\nSomeone stole a little girl\u2019s perfect attendance pencil. \n\nMe:pic.twitter.com/aXBot4y58G — AL (@AL) 1580478694 Hope you get your pencil back soon, Taylor. We all need a little glimmer of hope that justice can, indeed, prevail.This article originally appeared on 01.31.20

One of the greatest parenting milestones is the day you get to explain to your children the basics of sex. Sometimes that day arrives because a kid bluntly asks how babies are made, sometimes parents bring it up so their kids to hear it from them before they hear it from other people, and sometimes it's a result of an unexpected encounter (like a kid walking in on their parents doing the deed).However you arrive at it, that initial conversation is always interesting. No matter how prepared you think you are, some awkward hilarity is inevitable as you navigate those new waters. Sex is pretty simple on the one hand, but quite complicated on the other, and figuring what details to share at what stage is a tricky balancing act.Some kids are open and curious and ask a million questions. Some kids are quiet and reserved and process it all in their own sweet time. But the first reaction of most pre-pubescent kids when they first hear about the mechanics of sex, even if you introduce it in a sex-positive way, is something along the lines of "What?? Are you serious? EW." And when they connect the dots that their parents had sex in order for them to be alive, the reaction gets even funnier.A thread on Twitter illustrates how true this is as parents share their children's reactions to hearing about the birds and the bees. \u201c@Kezfromchadders @meganmuircoyle My daughter (6 at the time) asked if we need to have a doctor watch us do it since he is putting something inside my body. Then she asked if she could see how far it goes inside. \ud83d\ude2c We then explained privacy.\u201d — megan (@megan) 1612314141 Clearly, Megan has three kids. Logic.Some kids let questions slip out before thinking about whether they really want to know the answer. Once you know it, you can't unknow it. Sorry, kiddo.@meganmuircoyle On a summer walk my 1 boy(9) was asking ? about sex & I explained everything. My husband was away f… https://t.co/0hHQQxUFgt— arlene geerlinks (@arlene geerlinks) 1612372163.0Parents have to be prepared for awkward questions, but sometimes you really can't predict what a kid might want to know. Kids aren't exactly known for having boundaries, and that's doubly true for a topic that's totally new for them.Most of us don't like to imagine our parents having sex, so this is one area where kids who are adopted have somewhat of an advantage (until they learn that procreation isn't the only reason people have sex). \u201c@meganmuircoyle My kids are adopted, and I once heard, "Well, at least you guys didn't have to do THAT!"\u201d — megan (@megan) 1612314141 \u201c@meganmuircoyle My kid learned about it in the backseat at Target in a spur of the moment conversation. We got home and she goes up to her Dad, \u201cYOU STUCK YOUR PENIS IN MOM\u2019S VAGINA TWICE!!!\u201d\u201d — megan (@megan) 1612314141 It's not just the questions, but the declarations that come along with kids learning about sex that can take parents by surprise. \u201c@meganmuircoyle @bames_jrolin My nephew was about 7 when he got this info. At the next big holiday dinner he spontaneously stood up on his chair, flexed his biceps and loudly announced, \u201cI am strong and healthy and full of sperm!\u201d\u201d — megan (@megan) 1612314141 It's always entertaining to see a kid's understanding move from innocence to reality.@meganmuircoyle when he got older I told him about the cervix, contractions, labour etc and he was like "oh. okay.… https://t.co/u7mnCiVYUg— L. (@L.) 1612384726.0And even more entertaining when you realize that you were the one who inadvertently introduced your kid to a sexual concept you may not have been prepared to discuss.And then there are the unintentional misunderstandings that occur when kids don't get quite enough information. — (@) Perhaps the funniest part about talking about sex with kids is how actually kind of weird the physical act really is when you think about it. Of course it seems absurd to children who haven't sexually developed yet.In fact, some kids find it so weird, they literally don't believe it.Like, what the heck with this design? And they don't even know at this point about the nitty-gritty details that you only really know once you've done it.As funny as these stories are, the fact that parents are having open and honest conversations with their kids about sex is seriously awesome. Some people do their kids a disservice by being too creeped out to talk about it, or maybe worrying they'll give too much info, so they don't talk about it. — (@) Whatever your moral perspectives on the topic, sex is part of life. It's basic health and biology. It's a human reality that everyone learns about one way or another, and it's generally better for kids to learn about sex from their parents than from their peers, who might give wrong information. Starting early by answering kids' questions matter-of-factly, giving age-appropriate details (which admittedly can be hard to discern), and bringing up the topic occasionally if your kids don't can help kids ease into a healthy understanding of sex.While the basic mechanics conversation is indeed a parenting milestone, the best parent-child conversations about sex are ongoing and ever-expanding. Making consent and boundaries part of the conversation is vital as well. Some uncomfortable moments may be inevitable, but keep the line of communication wide open will go a long way toward helping kids prepare for what's to come.This article originally appeared on 02.04.21

If it seems that everyone is being diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), there may be a reason and it's likely not the reason people think. Diagnostic criteria were initially based off of how ADHD presented in white children who were mostly male, so if you fell outside of that box your diagnosis was often overlooked. This is especially true in girls who then turned into undiagnosed or misdiagnosed women.But it's not just women who were undiagnosed since the criteria mostly included ways in which hyperactivity showed up—you know, the "H" in ADHD. But not everyone with ADHD presents with the stereotypical hyperactivity bit. Dr. Heather Brannon breaks down ways in which ADHD is missed and how to identify it in adults. In the first few minutes of the video, Brannon drops a statistic that feels mind-boggling: "75% of adults with anxiety actually have ADHD as the cause of their anxiety." Even though I fit into that category, consider my mind completely boggled because I thought I was a rarity and my psychiatrist was a magician. Turns out, he was probably just up to date on his continuing education credits.Brannon talks about how people who may express feelings of overwhelm, anxiousness, and tiredness and who are easily frustrated may actually have undiagnosed ADHD. It's pretty easy to overlook ADHD that presents with more of the attention deficit part of the diagnosis than the hyperactivity part. When someone is having difficulty sitting still, talking so fast that you can barely keep up and is constantly on the go, it's pretty easy to pinpoint there may be an issue. But when the person is quiet, sits still but misses large chunks of conversations or is chronically forgetful and sleepy, it's much easier to miss the signs, according to Brannon. Brannon says many people feel bad about themselves without knowing why, so having an answer for why you're feeling this way can be helpful. The video is really fascinating and may help others recognize signs within themselves or with loved ones. Give it a gander below:This article originally appeared on 1.20.23

Cats are underappreciated geniuses in so many ways…why not add singing into the mix? Folks on Reddit were delighted by a video of a girl singing opera and getting unapologetically interrupted by her cat, who then ended up completely stealing the spotlight by belting out a few notes. Yep, a total diva move that only a cat could get away with. The clip is so hilarious that we didn’t want you missing out. Even the girl can’t stay mad as kitty starts to make those weird little chirps (you know, the alien noises cats make when they see a bird) set in perfect tempo to the accompaniment. Her mood quickly goes from “Excuse me?” to all out cackling.Watch: Singing girl is interrupted in the most adorable way. by u/SnorkinOrkin in MadeMeSmile Like, seriously…that cat is definitely singing, amirite? Viewers on Reddit had a field day in the comments. “I love cats. Such perfectly broken creatures,” one person wrote. Another added, “It sounded like the cat was actually trying to meow along with the tune of the song! So cute! Clever cat!”And of course, fellow cat owners couldn’t help but relate. One shared, “As a singer with cats, they love singing. I have an audience whenever I practice.”Many were hellbent on figuring out how kitty was able to seemingly sing on beat. One person made a valid guess, writing, “I think she’s playing a YouTube karaoke track and there’s some kind of bouncing icon above the words that the cat is focusing on, that’s why the cat is so in sync ?”One helpful Reddit user noted that the singer has a TikTok channel (@maura.music) filled with even more opurra—or should we say meowpera?—duets with her cat, who we can now lovingly call Max.Check out this one: @maura.music Warming up those vocal chords?#OperaCat #catsinger #catsoftiktok #musictok #operatok #catduet #catcomedy #OperaSinger ♬ original sound - maura music Thanks, Max. You truly are a star. (And your human is pretty talented, too.)This article originally appeared on 4.7.23

There’s an old trope in movies and TV where a criminal will return to the scene of a crime shortly after it was committed. It’s a great way to create a sense of drama and to give an easy way for the heroes to catch the perpetrator, but does it happen in real life?It doesn’t make much sense for a criminal to put themselves in a position to get caught, but neither does committing a crime in the first place. If a criminal does return to the scene, it’s often so they can relive some of the sensations they felt while committing the crime.Such was the case with alleged dog-napper Kyle Gariepy, 29.On Friday, May 7, 2021, the Cambridge Police Department in Massachusetts reported that a 13-month-old German shorthaired pointer named “Titus” was stolen out of a parked vehicle. The department released footage of the alleged dog-napper walking the dog over the Boston University bridge. Yesterday at approximately 12:32p, an unknown suspect broke into and entered a vehicle that was parked at\u00a0620 Memorial Drive\u00a0& stole a 13-month-old white German Short Haired Pointer out of the vehicle. The suspect was then observed walking the dog over the BU Bridge into Boston.pic.twitter.com/titQ0WvPMM — Cambridge Police\ud83d\udc6e\ud83c\udffd (@Cambridge Police\ud83d\udc6e\ud83c\udffd) 1620479831 The dog was wearing an orange collar with the name “Titu.”If anyone has any information about this incident, they are strongly encouraged to call the Cambridge Police at 617-349-3300. #CambMA pic.twitter.com/iUQAO62u9L— Cambridge Police?? (@CambridgePolice) May 8, 2021 The next day, members of the local 7NEWS crew, including Juliana Mazza and photojournalist John Guice, posted up in the parking lot where the dog was stolen to report on the theft. While the news crew was setting up, they noticed a man who looked like the person in the surveillance cam footage walking a dog that looked like Titus.Guice walked over to the man, whose name is Kyle Gariepy, and struck up a conversation with him while the news team rolled the camera. Mazza then walked over and asked if she could pet the dog so she could surreptitiously see if he had a name tag.When she found out the dog was Titus, she asked the man why he didn’t call the number on the tag and he said his phone was “broken.” This begged a follow-up question. It’s been a day, why haven’t you contacted the owner or the authorities?Gariepy gave a very strange excuse for why he had the dog."He was just barking in the car, and I walked past the car, and I thought it was supposed to be a dog I was dog walking," Gariepy told the crew. "It wasn't a kidnapping. It was just a simple mistake."Why in the world would someone ask him to walk a dog that was in a parked car?Gariepy’s story didn’t add up, so the news crew called the police and Gariepy stood there and waited until they arrived. Gariepy was arrested and charged with larceny of more than $1,200, and breaking and entering into a vehicle to commit a felony. Just need to say how grateful I am to my photojournalist that day, John Guice! He actually spoke with the man first about how beautiful Titus was. As I walked over I quickly realized we found the dog and had the suspect. Wouldn\u2019t have been possible without him!https://twitter.com/InsideEdition/status/1391913529243049984\u00a0\u2026 — Juliana Mazza (@Juliana Mazza) 1620694235 Later, the police called Titus’ owner Greg Siesczkiewicz and asked him to come and pick up his dog."I'm thrilled to have Titus back. I think, he is thrilled to have me back," he told Inside Edition."I'm just glad that the person came back and I'm just glad that you guys were there," Siesczkiewicz told 7NEWS. "If anyone ever sees this who questions the value of media, social media, broadcast media, this proves it."This article originally appeared on 2.25.22

Optical illusions are always fun to play with, but some can be particularly challenging on the old eyes and brain. It's fascinating to see how different people process them and how quickly or slowly—or sometimes not at all—people see things that aren't really there or see images hidden within other images.Not to brag, but I'm kind of an optical illusion savant. It usually doesn't take me longer than a few seconds to see whatever it is people say they are seeing. But occasionally an illusion comes along that stumps me to the point where I wonder if people are actually lying about what they are seeing. This rectangle/circle illusion is one of those.It's called the coffer illusion and was created by Stanford University psychologist and vision scientist Anthony Norcia. The image is made up of a pattern of black, white and gray lines of various shades that create the illusion of rectangles. It's easy enough to see the rectangles. What's not so easy to see are the 16 circles in the image. Yes, they really are there. Take a look: \u201cLook closely.\n\nThere are actually 16 circles in this image.\n\nAnd once you see them, the image appears changed forever. \n\nThe wonderful coffer illusion, by Anthony Norcia\u201d — Gavin Buckingham (@Gavin Buckingham) 1657479098 Seriously, at first my brain said, "Nope." How could there be circles? All I see are straight lines. Straight lines horizontally. Straight lines vertically. Not a single curved line anywhere in sight. How can there be circles if there are nothing but right angles in the image?So I did what any self-respecting social-media-savvy person would do and started scrolling the comments to see if anyone explained how they saw circles. (Warning: Spoilers ahead if you're still trying to see the circles on your own.) One way to see the circles is to focus on the vertical bars between the rectangles. For some, that makes the circles suddenly pop off the screen. \u201c@DeVore @adamgreatkind @DrGBuckingham Thanks, I was staring and staring, following your advice, nothing, still just rectangles, and then I blinked and the circles were there. Magic!\u201d — Gavin Buckingham (@Gavin Buckingham) 1657479098 For people who need more of a visual clue, someone broke it down with colored shapes, literally circling one of the circles. \u201c@nathangs20 @DrGBuckingham THANK YOU. \n\nSo weird, my brain actually jolted when I saw them.\u201d — Gavin Buckingham (@Gavin Buckingham) 1657479098 Once you see them, it's pretty easy to switch back and forth, but hoo boy, does it take a while to actually see them the first time. Why is that?According to an explanation from a professor and student from the University of Sydney, the reason we have a hard time seeing the circles at first is because of our brain's strong tendency to identify objects in what we're seeing. The lines come together to form edges, contours and shapes, and our brains fill in the objects. "For most people, the grouping into rectangles initially dominates," the authors write. "This may be because rectangles (including the ones we see in door panels) are often more common than circles in our daily environment, and so the brain favours the grouping that delivers rectangular shapes."I figure it's also likely due to the rectangles looking more 3D (therefore like a real object) while the circles appear as 2D. Aren't our brains amazing? This article originally appeared on 7.11.22