YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #satire #faith #libtards #racism #crime
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
1 y

Pro-Life Activist Charged by Biden DOJ Gets Almost 5 Years in Prison for Trying to Stop Abortions
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

Pro-Life Activist Charged by Biden DOJ Gets Almost 5 Years in Prison for Trying to Stop Abortions

Pro-life activist Lauren Handy has been sentenced on Justice Department charges to almost five years in prison for attempting to stop abortions of unborn babies from taking place at a Washington, D.C., abortion clinic. Handy will spend 57 months in prison and is the first person sentenced for violating the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act, a 1994 law that supposedly protects both abortion clinics and pregnancy resource centers, but has been heavily enforced by President Joe Biden’s DOJ against pro-lifers since the June 2022 overturning of Roe v. Wade. Those efforts are led by Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke, the head of the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, who just admitted following a report from The Daily Signal that she hid an arrest and its subsequent expungement from investigators when she was confirmed to her Justice Department post. The president’s critics have accused Biden and the DOJ of weaponizing the FACE Act against pro-lifers while failing to charge pro-abortion criminals for the hundreds of attacks on pregnancy resource centers since the May 2022 leak of the draft Supreme Court opinion indicating Roe would soon be overturned. Some, among them Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, and Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, have called for the repeal of the FACE Act. “Today’s outrageous 57-month sentence for a progressive pro-life activist is a stark reminder: Biden’s DOJ is fully weaponized against pro-life American citizens, and they are using the FACE Act to do it,” said Roy in a statement following Handy’s sentence. “House Republicans should defund the DOJ weaponization, repeal the FACE Act, and stand up for the freedoms that we campaign on.” U.S. District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly told Handy, according to The Washington Post, that “the law does not protect violence or obstructive conduct—nor should it. That’s what you’re being punished for; not your views on abortion, nor your very American commitment to peaceful protest.” Handy is being represented by lawyers with the Thomas More Society, which said Tuesday that it is preparing to proceed with an appeal seeking to overturn her conviction and challenge the constitutionality of the FACE Act. A Washington, D.C., jury had convicted Handy on Aug. 29, 2023, on charges of violating both the FACE Act and “conspiracy against rights” brought by the Biden DOJ against her and a number of other pro-life activists related to a “rescue” they performed at a D.C. abortion clinic, the Washington Surgi-Clinic. Thomas More Society lawyers had asked the court to show leniency towards Handy with a 12-month sentence, while the Biden DOJ had requested a sentence up to six-and-a-half years. ? BREAKING: Today, peaceful pro-life advocate Lauren Handy was sentenced to 57 months in federal prison on FACE Act charges brought by the Biden DOJ. Read our reaction: https://t.co/UYC0OU0E1a— Thomas More Society (@ThomasMoreSoc) May 14, 2024 “There was only one thing around which Ms. Handy and her co-defendants were unified, and that was nonviolence,” said Martin Cannon, Thomas More Society senior counsel, in a statement on Tuesday. “They conspired to be peaceful. Yet, today, the Court granted the Biden Department of Justice its wish by sentencing Ms. Handy to 57 months—nearly 5 years in prison.” “For her efforts to peacefully protect the lives of innocent preborn human beings, Ms. Handy deserves thanks, not a gut-wrenching prison sentence,” he added. “We will vigorously pursue an appeal of Ms. Handy’s conviction and attack the root cause of this injustice; that is, the FACE Act—which we believe is unconstitutional and should never again be used to persecute peaceful pro-lifers.” Steve Crampton, who is also senior counsel with the Thomas More Society, called Handy’s sentence a “miscarriage of justice, plain and simple.” “As I’ve gotten to know Ms. Handy, I’ve seen up close her unwavering passion for pro-life advocacy and resolute dedication to nonviolence,” he said in a statement. “The caricature of Ms. Handy that the Biden Department of Justice fabricated flies in the face of reality. Ms. Handy should have been shown the same mercy that she has herself shown to countless many downtrodden throughout her young life.” Handy is a member of the Progressive Anti-Abortion Uprising, a pro-life group made up of activists with more unusual backgrounds than one might expect—including atheism, transgenderism, and more. In March 2022, Handy and colleague Terrisa Bukovinac discovered the bodies of five preemie-sized aborted babies’ bodies in a box of fetal remains outside the Foggy Bottom-based abortion facility. That box also contained over a hundred pulverized remains of first-trimester babies, they said. Pro-life activists believe the babies’ bodies are evidence that a D.C. abortionist was performing illegal abortions, but for two years now, D.C. authorities have stonewalled any questions about the babies’ deaths. Handy has said that she was motivated to stop abortions from occurring inside Washington Surgi-Clinic after she viewed an undercover video published by the pro-life group Live Action that allegedly showed abortionist Cesare Santangelo discussing how he would allow babies to die if they were accidentally delivered during abortions. The District does not have any laws that regulate how late during pregnancy a baby can be aborted. So when the babies’ bodies were originally brought to light, D.C. police shrugged off the matter.  Ashan Benedict, the Metropolitan Police Department’s executive assistant chief of police, went so far as to tell reporters in April 2022 that the babies appeared to have been aborted “in accordance with D.C. law.”  Police have repeatedly told The Daily Signal since then that the case is still “under investigation.” Authorities will not share whether autopsies have been performed on the babies’ remains, though the D.C. Medical Examiner said in February that it would not immediately destroy the babies’ bodies after a slew of lawmakers demanded that they be preserved. The mayor’s office has completely stonewalled questions about the babies. Even the office of the chief medical examiner for the District of Columbia directs queries to the mayor’s office—specifically, to Dora Taylor-Lowe, who refused to answer The Daily Signal’s requests for comment.  It remains unclear whether autopsies have been performed on the bodies of the five babies, whose bodies were photographed by Bukovinac. (Warning: These images are graphic and disturbing.) And though D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser refused to address the possibility that Santangelo was criminally aborting late-term babies in the nation’s capital, she did accuse Handy of “tampering with fetal remains” in an April 2022 letter to Republican lawmakers highlighting that Handy herself faced FACE Act charges for blocking the entrance to a D.C. abortion clinic in October 2020. Handy’s involvement in the discovery of the remains, as well as her participation in the October 2020 “blockade,” according to Bowser, are potentially “serious violations of federal law.” The post Pro-Life Activist Charged by Biden DOJ Gets Almost 5 Years in Prison for Trying to Stop Abortions appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
1 y

‘SHAM’: House Speaker Johnson Condemns Trial of Trump as ‘Politically Motivated’
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

‘SHAM’: House Speaker Johnson Condemns Trial of Trump as ‘Politically Motivated’

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., in New York on Tuesday, condemned the so-called hush-money criminal trial of former President Donald Trump. Johnson blasted the trial as a “sham” and said that it’s being used to manipulate the 2024 presidential election. I’m disgusted by what’s happening in the sham trial against President Trump.The American people can see it’s politically motivated.Their star witness, Michael Cohen, is a known liar who is clearly on a mission for personal revenge. pic.twitter.com/dub4dyu91s— Speaker Mike Johnson (@SpeakerJohnson) May 14, 2024 “I’m an attorney. I’m a former litigator myself. I’m disgusted by what is happening here,” the Louisiana lawmaker said. “What is being done here is being done to our entire system of justice overall.” Johnson said that the American people are “losing faith” in the U.S. justice system and our institutions because they see them being “abused.” The House speaker said that the facts in Trump’s case are important, as they always are in a trial. The former president’s actions were “previously reviewed, and no charges were filed. Why is that?” Johnson asked rhetorically. “Because there’s no crime here,” he said, answering his own question. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg started up this case eight years after the crime was allegedly committed, Johnson said, because “it’s painfully obvious, we’re six months out from an election day, and that’s the reason they brought these charges here and across the country.” Johnson noted that the legal officials in this case are all partisan Democrats. “What we’ve got here is a partisan Democrat district attorney. We have a [President Joe] Biden donor judge, and we have an [assistant district attorney] who was recently a top official at the Department of Justice, Biden’s DOJ, and recently received over $10,000 in payments from the Democratic National Committee,” he said. Bragg, who brought the charges against Trump, also is a Democrat. Johnson said that the “star witness” in the Trump trial, former Trump attorney Michael Cohen, is simply out for retribution. Cohen is “clearly on a mission for personal revenge,” the Louisiana Republican said, adding that Cohen is known to be a witness who “has had trouble with the truth.” Cohen admitted to lying to Congress in 2017, which was among the crimes that led to his disbarment. “There’s nothing he presents here that should be given any weight at all by a jury and certainly not by this judge,” Johnson said. The charge against Trump is falsification of business records, he said, “but I think everyone knows that he is not the bookkeeper of his company.” The House speaker said that Trump is “innocent” in the case and that “anyone with common sense can see what’s happening here.” On top of everything else, Johnson said, the court has issued a gag order against Trump, which deprives the former president of his right to free speech during an election campaign. The whole trial represents a clear case where the judicial system has been weaponized against Trump, he said, and is punishing one presidential nominee while providing “cover” for another. “The American people are not going to let this stand,” Johnson said. “Election Day cannot get here soon enough, and we will continue to shine a light on all of this in Congress because we have that constitutional responsibility.” The post ‘SHAM’: House Speaker Johnson Condemns Trial of Trump as ‘Politically Motivated’ appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
1 y

Mike Lee: Biden DOJ ‘Unjustly’ Persecuting Pro-Lifers, ‘Turning a Blind Eye’ To Leftist Crime
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

Mike Lee: Biden DOJ ‘Unjustly’ Persecuting Pro-Lifers, ‘Turning a Blind Eye’ To Leftist Crime

FIRST ON THE DAILY SIGNAL: Republican Utah Sen. Mike Lee accused President Joe Biden’s Department of Justice on Tuesday of “unjustly” persecuting pro-life activists exposing the “horrors of abortion.” “The Biden administration is using the FACE Act to give pro-life activists and senior citizens lengthy prison terms for non-violent offenses and protests—all while turning a blind eye to the violence, arson, and riots conducted on behalf of ‘approved’ leftist causes,” Lee told The Daily Signal in a Tuesday statement. The senator added: “Unequal enforcement of the law is a violation of the law, and men and women who try to expose the horrors of abortion are being unjustly persecuted for their motivations.” Lee’s comments come after news that pro-life activist Lauren Handy has been sentenced on DOJ charges to almost five years in prison for attempting to stop abortions of unborn babies from taking place at a Washington, D.C., abortion clinic. Handy will spend 57 months in prison and is the first person sentenced for violating the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act, a 1994 law that supposedly protects both abortion clinics and pregnancy resource centers, but has been heavily enforced by Biden’s DOJ against pro-lifers since the June 2022 overturning of Roe v. Wade. Those efforts are led by Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke, the head of the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, who recently admitted following a report from The Daily Signal that she hid an arrest and its subsequent expungement from investigators when she was confirmed to her Justice Department post. The president’s critics have accused Biden and the DOJ of weaponizing the FACE Act against pro-lifers while failing to charge pro-abortion criminals for the hundreds of attacks on pregnancy resource centers since the May 2022 leak of the draft Supreme Court opinion indicating Roe would soon be overturned. Some, among them Lee and Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas,have called for the repeal of the FACE Act. “Today’s outrageous 57-month sentence for a progressive pro-life activist is a stark reminder: Biden’s DOJ is fully weaponized against pro-life American citizens, and they are using the FACE Act to do it,” said Roy in a statement following Handy’s sentence. “House Republicans should defund the DOJ weaponization, repeal the FACE Act, and stand up for the freedoms that we campaign on.” Handy is being represented by lawyers with the Thomas More Society, which said Tuesday that it is preparing to proceed with an appeal seeking to overturn her conviction and challenge the constitutionality of the FACE Act. The post Mike Lee: Biden DOJ ‘Unjustly’ Persecuting Pro-Lifers, ‘Turning a Blind Eye’ To Leftist Crime appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
1 y

Why Did NPR Assign a Reporter With Ties to Soros-Funded Groups to Cover a Story About Illegal Alien Voting?
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

Why Did NPR Assign a Reporter With Ties to Soros-Funded Groups to Cover a Story About Illegal Alien Voting?

Are your own tax dollars funding an effort to discredit news about flyers encouraging illegal aliens to vote for President Joe Biden in U.S. elections? National Public Radio’s recent efforts to “cover” the story suggest an attempt to delegitimize it. NPR assigned a reporter with ties to left-wing groups funded by billionaire financier George Soros to write the story. That reporter refused to answer a question about whether she was concerned about illegal aliens voting in the 2024 presidential election. Last month, The Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project and the news site Muckraker exposed flyers posted at Resource Center Matamoros, just across the U.S.-Mexico border in Tamaulipas. (Heritage created The Daily Signal in 2014.) The flyers, written in Spanish, urged migrants headed to the U.S. “to vote for President Biden when you are in the United States,” explaining that the resource center needs “another four years of his term to stay open.” Gaby Zavala, the center’s founder, didn’t respond to The Daily Signal’s requests for comment, but she told other news outlets that she didn’t post the flyers. NPR told the story from Zavala’s perspective, quoting her before discussing the flyers. ?BREAKING – Flyers distributed at NGO in Mexico encouraging illegals to vote for President BidenThe flyers reads:“Reminder to vote for President Biden when you are in the United States. We need another four years of his term to stay open”A MUST READ CRITICAL THREAD ? pic.twitter.com/Mod4IeROXf— Oversight Project (@OversightPR) April 16, 2024 “We have never encouraged people to vote for anyone,” Zavala told NPR, saying that she knows illegal aliens aren’t allowed to vote in U.S. elections. Federal law prohibits illegal aliens from voting in federal elections. Some jurisdictions, such as Washington, D.C., allow them to vote in local elections. The NPR article raises many questions about the vote-for-Biden flyers, suggesting that they represent a political ploy, rather than a legitimate discovery. It frames the Oversight Project’s executive director, Mike Howell, and Muckraker founder Anthony Rubin as troublemakers. NPR’s article quotes Jared Holt, who used to write for the far-left website Right Wing Watch, warning that “claims like these … may very well be another possible avenue to try to delegitimize democratic processes in this country.” The article also didn’t seriously address the “Vote Biden-Harris” sign found at a camp outside the center, nor a social media post showing balloons celebrating President Donald Trump’s loss to Biden in the 2020 election on Nov. 7, 2020. A recent study estimates that 10-27% of non-citizens are registered to vote, and based on previous elections and federal data, at least 1-2.7 million non-citizens will vote in the 2024 election. And a balloon sign celebrating President Trump leaving office pic.twitter.com/ietLlBNv2a— Oversight Project (@OversightPR) April 25, 2024 Not Concerned About Illegals Voting? NPR, a publicly funded news outlet that recently faced renewed criticism for left-wing bias after parting ways with now-former business editor Uri Berliner, assigned the story about the pro-Biden flyers to a reporter who had just joined the outlet last month. The reporter, Jude Joffe-Block, once volunteered for the discredited left-wing group Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, better known as ACORN. NPR released video of Joffe-Block’s interview with Howell and Rubin alongside the article. In that interview, Howell and Rubin pressed the NPR reporter on her history, and she confirmed that she did voter registration for ACORN but tried to end the interview when asked about it. “Are you concerned at all with illegal aliens possibly voting in our upcoming election?” Rubin asked. “I am not answering any more questions,” Joffe-Block said. ACORN spearheaded liberal causes such as affordable housing and voter registration, but it shut down in 2010 after scandals involving voter registration fraud and reported offers to help prostitution. Multiple ACORN staffers were convicted of voter registration fraud in the lead-up to the 2008 presidential election. ACORN hired more than 13,000 part-time workers and sent them into 21 states to sign up voters in minority and poor neighborhoods. The group bragged that it had submitted 1.3 million registration cards to local election officials, but election officials rejected 400,000 of those registrations for a variety of reasons. Many of those registrations involved fictional characters such as Mickey Mouse. Barack Obama had worked as ACORN’s lawyer before becoming president. Accusations of voter fraud at ACORN traced back to 2004. Joffe-Block insisted that she did not register any illegal aliens to vote while working with ACORN. Yet her stances on immigration and voting rights suggest a willingness to turn a blind eye to the issue of illegal aliens voting. ?NPR Confronted on Recording@NPR sent an alum of a voter fraud organization (@judejoffeblock) to write a hit piece about us and @realmuckraker and the BOMBSHELL story on the invasion camp in Mexico with flyers encouraging illegals to vote for BidenWATCH TILL END ? pic.twitter.com/nicvRox5io— Oversight Project (@OversightPR) May 10, 2024 Who Is Jude Joffe-Block? Jude Joffe-Block has worked in journalism for 18 years, according to her LinkedIn profile. She often has covered immigration and election issues with a left-wing bias. She wrote a book condemning former Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio and claiming that backlash against Arpaio helped change Arizona from a conservative state to a battleground state. Joffe-Block had a fellowship with a nonprofit that takes millions from Soros-established foundations. She helped contribute to a voting rights report from a left-wing group, partially funded by Soros, that opposes voter ID laws. Joffe-Block accepted the fellowship from the nonprofit New America in 2017. The fellowship helped her write the book “Driving While Brown: Sheriff Joe Arpaio versus the Latino Resistance,” which she published with co-author Terry Greene Sterling in 2021. A New America webinar event described the book as providing “critical insights into effective resistance to institutionalized racism and the community organizing that helped transform Arizona from a conservative stronghold into a battleground state.” Joffe-Block revealed more of her perspective in an interview with Arizona radio station KJZZ. She partially credited the efforts of “Dreamers” for the political shift. “Dreamer” refers to an illegal alien who came to the U.S. as a child and would be protected from deportation under the proposed Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors Act, or DREAM Act. Although the bill failed in Congress in 2011, as president Obama directed his administration to enact some of its provisions in the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, or DACA. The DACA program faced legal challenges from the start and remains in legal limbo after Trump attempted to rescind it and his successor, Biden, attempted to resurrect it. Joffe-Block suggested that Arizona shifted from a conservative state to a battleground state due to a backlash against Arpaio’s policies, just as—she claimed—California shifted blue in response to Proposition 187, a 1994 ballot initiative that aimed to deny social services to illegal aliens. Proposition 187 was approved by voters but died in the courts. Joffe-Block said in the radio interview that Lydia Guzman, a Latina activist featured in her book, had been “involved in a mass naturalization effort to get immigrants registered to vote” in California. “People like Lydia were waiting for years to see if that would happen in Arizona,” she added. “I think there are a lot of people—Lydia Guzman included—who felt on election night of 2020 that this long process, this long backlash, the organizing, the registering voters, the telling immigrants and Latinos that they had to vote out people who were opposed to them, that that had finally paid off,” Joffe-Block added. “This kind of organizing and the political power that happened, the young people that were brought into the process to help their parents and grandparents, all of that that happened, and some of them Dreamers, who were advocating for themselves and their families, as well.” “I think that without that—that imminent threat that many of them felt to themselves and their families, to the integrity of their families, whether someone might be deported, that that really did inspire some of the organizing that has changed the state’s politics,” she concluded. Joffe-Block didn’t explicitly state that Dreamers who registered to vote turned the tide in Arizona, but her remarks suggest that family members of illegal aliens, motivated in part by a desire to prevent deportation, organized the political movement responsible for propelling Democrats to victory. She has also claimed that “people use the words Mexicans and illegals interchangeably.” A graphic recording of the conversation at @NewAmerica #RenewAmerica between @joseiswriting and @cecmunoz by @seeincolors pic.twitter.com/2lfVi133Ew— Jude Joffe-Block (@judejoffeblock) May 18, 2017 George Soros Connections New America, the organization that incubated Joffe-Block’s book, has received hefty contributions from influential left-wing donors and foundations, most notably the Open Society Foundations established by Soros (and now run by the financier’s son, Alex Soros). According to New America’s website, the Open Society Foundations has directed more than $6.5 million to the organization. Other major contributors include the Ford Foundation, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and the Rockefeller Foundation. The left-wing Arabella Advisors and the Tides Foundation set up nonprofits to allow donors to pour “dark money” into left-leaning projects without disclosing which projects these donors fund. According to IRS tax forms accessed via ProPublica, the Arabella network group New Venture Fund sent New America more than $1.6 million between 2014 and 2021, while three other Arabella funds (North Fund, Hopewell Fund, and Sixteen Thirty Fund) sent it more than $500,000 in 2020 and 2021. The Tides Foundation sent New America $1.1 million between 2018 and 2022. The Brennan Center In August 2019, the Brennan Center for Justice credited Joffe-Block for contributing to a report on “Restoring the Right to Vote.” That report calls for repealing laws preventing felons from voting, saying the laws “serve no legitimate purpose.” The report also claims that felon disenfranchisement laws “are rooted in the Jim Crow era and were designed to lock freed slaves out of the voting process.” It urges states to restore voting rights for felons automatically when they exit prison and urges law enforcement to educate inmates about their voting rights as they leave. Yet the claim that felon disfranchisement has racist origins is false. As explained by Han von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation, most states took voting rights away from those convicted of serious crimes long before the Civil War, when many black Americans were slaves and could not vote. The Brennan Center also condemns election integrity efforts such as laws requiring ID to vote, restricting voter registration, and “purging voter rolls.” The Brennan Center also has ties to Soros and the Left’s dark money network. Soros’ Open Society Foundations directed at least $4.8 million in grants to the center between 2016 and 2021, according to IRS records. The Arabella network’s New Venture Fund gave the center $1.6 million between 2014 and 2022, while the Tides Foundation funneled more than $1 million to the group between 2018 and 2022. NPR did not respond to The Daily Signal’s multiple requests for comment for this story. Zavala did not respond to questions about whether she is concerned that NPR would assign a reporter with ties to ACORN to defend her amid concerns that her center might have encouraged voter fraud. The post Why Did NPR Assign a Reporter With Ties to Soros-Funded Groups to Cover a Story About Illegal Alien Voting? appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
1 y

More Defensive Gun Uses Undermine Government Claims About Armed Civilians
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

More Defensive Gun Uses Undermine Government Claims About Armed Civilians

It should be painfully obvious to anyone paying attention that the Biden administration distrusts an armed civilian population and is willing to fudge the truth time and again to defend its untenable positions. But for those living blissfully unaware of the Biden administration’s animosity toward gun owners, it once again demonstrated its animosity in clear terms. Earlier this month, the Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security accidentally said the quiet part out loud: It thinks that only the government really can be trusted with firearms, even when the government at issue is notoriously corrupt. Fortunately, the bureau’s new export regulations—though problematic in many ways—don’t affect the Second Amendment rights of U.S. citizens. They do, however, explicitly push a United Nations-backed talking point that wrongly blames lawfully armed civilians for criminal gun trafficking and insists that guns are safest when in the hands of government actors. Even if we were to forget the atrocities committed during the 20th century against largely unarmed civilians at the hands of well-armed governments, this line of reasoning would still clash with natural law, which insists that all people have an intrinsic, unalienable right of self-defense. The reality is that the government simply cannot be present at all times and in all places to protect us from criminal harm, nor should we want to live in a police state where the government has such terrifying power. Moreover, when given the option to possess the instruments necessary to defend themselves, their loved ones, and their communities from harm, armed Americans routinely show themselves quite capable of doing so in a responsible manner. Almost every major study has found that Americans use their firearms in self-defense between 500,000 and 3 million times annually, according to a 2013 report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In 2021, the most comprehensive study ever conducted on the issue concluded that roughly 1.6 million defensive gun uses occur in the United States every year. For this reason, The Daily Signal publishes a monthly article highlighting some of the previous month’s many news stories on defensive gun use that you may have missed—or that might not have made it to the national spotlight in the first place. (Read other accounts here from past years.) The examples below represent only a small portion of the news stories on defensive gun use that we found in April. You may explore more using The Heritage Foundation’s interactive Defensive Gun Use Database. (Heritage founded The Daily Signal in 2014.) April 1, Norway, Maine: After hearing glass break at a neighbor’s home, police said, a man armed himself and went outside to investigate. He discovered a would-be burglar trying to break in and held her at gunpoint until police arrived. The woman was charged with attempted burglary and criminal mischief. April 3, Murray, Utah: A man armed with an illegally possessed firearm approached a woman who’d just left a gym and demanded her keys at gunpoint, police said. The woman—a concealed carry permit holder—exchanged gunfire with the would-be carjacker, striking him once. The wounded assailant fled, but he and his getaway driver were later arrested and charged with federal offenses. The woman was treated at a hospital for unspecified injuries. April 6, St. Louis: Police said a woman shot and wounded her ex-boyfriend after he acted as though he had a gun, threatened to kill her, and chased her around the block while her young son looked on from her car. The man had a history of domestic violence arrests and previously had used firearms to threaten her, investigators said. April 10, Hialeah, Florida: A woman’s ex-boyfriend showed up to her home and, after seeing a male friend of hers leave the residence, physically attacked him. Her friend drew a legally concealed firearm and fatally shot his assailant, police said. The dead man’s lengthy criminal history included stalking, harassing, and assaulting his former girlfriend. April 12, Coos Bay, Oregon: A resident shot and wounded an intruder who broke into his home just after midnight, armed with a golf club, police said. April 15, Chicago: When a gunman opened fire on people sitting outside a Greyhound bus station downtown, a concealed carry permit holder drew his own firearm and shot back. The gunman apparently fled and neither the permit holder nor any bystander was injured, police said. April 17, Georgetown County, South Carolina: A man acted in justified self-defense when he fatally shot the ex-boyfriend of a woman at whose apartment he was staying, police said. The former boyfriend arrived at the apartment, threatened to shoot the man, and reached into his pocket for a gun. The man drew his own gun and shot his would-be assailant first. Police were looking for an accomplice, who faces charges of attempted murder. April 20, Terre Haute, Indiana: Arriving home, a man noticed a truck was following him as he pulled into his driveway. When the resident got out of his car, the truck driver “let out this battle cry yell and just floored the gas,” police said. He sped directly at the resident, who tried to jump out of the way. As the truck struck him and his car, the resident drew his gun and fired “about 10 shots” to defend himself, police said. The truck driver, whom police said was naked and suffering from gunshot wounds, climbed out of a window and ran away. Police arrested him after a chase in a stolen vehicle. The resident’s injuries included two broken bones in a lower leg. April 25, San Antonio: In the span of a few hours, two armed residents shot three burglars in two separate incidents, police said. In the first, a resident shot and wounded an intruder who broke into his home. In the second, a resident shot and wounded two burglars after he caught them stealing roofing materials from his driveway. April 29, Houston: Police said that when an intruder broke into the home of a well-known criminal attorney and charged at a resident with a metal object, one of the homeowner’s relatives shot and wounded him. The intruder fled, but the homeowner and others caught and held him in the street until police arrived to arrest him. The Biden administration may think that ordinary civilians are less capable of responsible gun ownership than government actors, but as these defensive gun uses demonstrate, ordinary civilians have every reason to push back on such unfounded claims. Time and again, armed civilians like the ones highlighted here underscore why the right to keep and bear arms is so critical to a free society. Even in countries that, unlike the United States, fail to protect such a critical individual right, ordinary civilians retain an unalienable natural right to self-defense. We should correct false notions that armed civilians are inherently bad and government monopolies on the instruments of lethal force are good—and not bite hook, line, and sinker into authoritarian notions of international gun control. The post More Defensive Gun Uses Undermine Government Claims About Armed Civilians appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Hot Air Feed
Hot Air Feed
1 y

US Military Has Been Kicked Out of Niger
Favicon 
hotair.com

US Military Has Been Kicked Out of Niger

US Military Has Been Kicked Out of Niger
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
1 y

De Niro Goes on Profanity-Laced Tirade, Claims Trump Is 'Already' Hitler/Mussolini
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

De Niro Goes on Profanity-Laced Tirade, Claims Trump Is 'Already' Hitler/Mussolini

Between co-host Sunny Hostin saying there were too many white people in Trump’s courtroom and George Stephanopoulos praising the Deep State, the Tuesday edition of ABC’s The View was already stacked with outrageous moments before Trump-hater and actor, Robert De Niro took the stage late in the show. The bitter aging actor went on an unhinged and profanity-filled tirade against the former President and asserted that he was “already” like Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini. “I don't understand why people are not taking him seriously [as a threat],” De Niro decried, “because you read about it historically in other countries that they didn't take the people seriously. Think of Hitler and Mussolini. They were fools and clowns. Well -- and I hear -- some people -- I mean, who does not think that this guy is going to do exactly what he says he's going to do? He's done it already.” De Niro predicted that, if Trump got elected again, at some point he and other people against Trump would be able to say, “We told you so.” He then lashed out at Trump’s supporters with a deluge of profanity that caused executive producer Brian Teta to mute the entire show, not just De Niro: DE NIRO: It's going to happen. If he gets elected it's going to change this country for everybody and they might think that it's going to make their life better or just want, excuse my French [Show mutes as De Niro curses] [Cheers and applause] Literally. Those people who support him with anger and hate because that's what he's about, they're going to see. I mean, I used to see these things -- I didn't understand how he and Rosie O’Donnell used to get – I didn’t really care. I see what a hateful, mean-spirited awful thing he is.     Wallowing in hypocrisy, De Niro argued that he wanted to punch Trump in the face because Trump once said he wanted to punch a person who was disrupting one of his rallies during the 2016 election: And why will he not do that in this country? He's already done it. Why would he not -- when I say I want to punch him in the face, it’s cause what he said to a person, a bystander, or somebody in one of his rallies, he wants to punch him in the face. You don't talk that way to people. “What kind of person does that?” De Niro asked. Well, Robert, you do. What does that say about you? De Niro would go on a much longer profanity-filled tirade, causing the show’s audio to break in and out multiple times: DE NIRO: He's done everything. What more do you need? It's almost like he wants to do the worst that he could possibly do to show this country [Show mutes as De Niro curses] His Slau [Show mutes as De Niro curses] I [Show mutes as De Niro curses] [Cheers and applause] As they were nearing the end of the segment, moderator Whoopi Goldberg chimed in to claim – without evidence – that Trump planned to take over the country and not relinquish power until he died. “Listen, he's not going to not stop being president! You understand this?! His idea is to stay in until he drops dead!” she screeched. “That's it! He's not even conceding it now so imagine if he actually did win the election. It's over!” De Niro agreed. “We're going to have such civil strife. All the things he says because everybody is now on to him where he projects what he's saying. It's what he wants, what he envisions the world to be, which is chaos and craziness, total craziness.” The transcript is below. Click "expand" to read: ABC’s The View May 14, 2024 11:50:55 a.m. Eastern (…) ROBERT DE NIRO: I don't understand why people are not taking him seriously, because you read about it historically in other countries that they didn't take the people seriously. Think of Hitler and Mussolini. They were fools and clowns. Well -- and I hear -- some people -- I mean, who does not think that this guy is going to do exactly what he says he's going to do? SUNNY HOSTIN: Right. DE NIRO: He's done it already. JOY BEHAR: Worse. [Applause] DE NIRO: And then what? We're going to sit around and say, “What? We told you so” or whoever, “I told you so?” It's going to happen. If he gets elected it's going to change this country for everybody and they might think that it's going to make their life better or just want, excuse my French [Show mutes as De Niro curses] [Cheers and applause] Literally. Those people who support him with anger and hate because that's what he's about, they're going to see. I mean, I used to see these things -- I didn't understand how he and Rosie O’Donnell used to get – I didn’t really care. I see what a hateful, mean-spirited awful thing he is. BEHAR: He was vicious to her. DE NIRO: He's vicious. BEHAR: Vicious. DE NIRO: And why will he not do that in this country? He's already done it. Why would he not -- when I say I want to punch him in the face, it’s cause what he said to a person, a bystander or somebody in one of his rallies, he wants to punch him in the face. You don't talk that way to people. What kind of person does that? [Applause] BEHAR: Makes fun of the physically challenged. He makes fun of people who have physical challenges. DE NIRO: He's done that too. He's done everything. BEHAR: Trashes the military. He says people who go to war are losers. Wake up! DE NIRO: He's done everything. What more do you need? It's almost like he wants to do the worst that he could possibly do to show this country [Show mutes as De Niro curses] His Slau [Show mutes as De Niro curses] I [Show mutes as De Niro curses] [Cheers and applause] WHOOPI GOLDBERG: And the other thing is if he becomes president again, he is never -- listen, he's not going to not stop being president! You understand this?! His idea is to stay in until he drops dead! DE NIRO: That's it. He's not even conceding it now so imagine if he actually did win the election. It's over. We're going to have such civil strife. All the things he says because everybody is now on to him where he projects what he's saying. It's what he wants, what he envisions the world to be, which is chaos and craziness, total craziness. GOLDBERG: But what isn't crazy is the fact that we love when you come here. (…)
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
1 y

‘Shocked’: TV Host Blasts TikTok, Instagram for Blocking Pro-Israel Content
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

‘Shocked’: TV Host Blasts TikTok, Instagram for Blocking Pro-Israel Content

A NewsNation host slammed communist Chinese government-tied TikTok and Meta-owned Instagram for censoring content on one of the most hotly debated topics online. On May 3, NewsNation founder and host Dan Abrams declared himself “shocked” by censorship of his pro-Israel content on two popular social media platforms. These are just the latest cases of bias and censorship related to the Hamas-Israel conflict. Dan Abrams discussed the censorship of his content with his father Floyd Abrams during the Dan Abrams Live show. The NewsNation host played a clip of him challenging a pro-Palestinian professor on why anti-Israel protesters “call for a Hamas ceasefire proposal, if ceasefire was their true goal.” According to the host, this content was censored on Instagram for allegedly promoting a dangerous organization.  Dan Abrams also touched on TikTok’s ties to the communist Chinese government and compared the differing standards he said the app used in censoring content challenging Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu versus the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry.  “I mean, look, on TikTok, I guess I wasn’t as surprised, that they are, it’s owned by China, right? ... The content that they censored from me was when I was questioning the numbers from the Gaza Health Ministry, and I had an expert on who was saying that the numbers can’t make sense,” the NewsNation host said. “They wouldn’t let me share that. But then, when I asked tough questions of Netanyahu’s spokesperson, oh, that was fine to distribute.” Dan Abrams’s father appeared to agree. “It is really unforgivable for an entity that relies on free speech, that purports to defend free speech, to engage in that sort of content-centric, ‘you have to be on our side’ censorship,” the lawyer slammed TikTok.  TikTok is owned by Chinese ByteDance. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) owns a board seat and maintains a financial stake in TikTok’s parent company ByteDance. Previously, actor Nate Buzolic also accusedInstagram and TikTok of censoring his pro-Israel, anti-Hamas content. TikTok even openly bragged about removing over 500,000 pieces of content relative to the ongoing Hamas-Israel conflict. Conservatives are under attack. Contact TikTok via email at communitymanager@tiktok.com and demand Big Tech be held to account to mirror the First Amendment while providing transparency, clarity on so-called “hate speech” and equal footing for conservatives. If you have been censored, contact us at the Media Research Center contact form, and help us hold Big Tech accountable.
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
1 y

UCLA Jewish student ATTACKED; Biden turns a blind eye
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

UCLA Jewish student ATTACKED; Biden turns a blind eye

Amid the violent protests taking over UCLA, a young Jewish woman was surrounded by five people wearing keffiyehs and bludgeoned in the head until she lost consciousness.Her assailants stomped on her Israeli flag until she was carried away and sent to the ER. While the video is impossible to ignore, there hasn’t been a word from President Joe Biden about the anti-Semitic attacks taking place on college campuses. “Joe Biden hasn’t said a damn thing. Others have said, and they’re right, if these weren’t Jews, if they were black Americans or Asian Americans or Hispanic Americans, Joe Biden would have a completely different response,” Mark Levin says, disturbed. “But not when it comes to Jews,” he continues. “What does that tell you? What it tells you, what I’ve said, but nobody else wants to say: Joe Biden’s an anti-Semite.” “Why is that so hard to come to grips with? I mean, it’s horrendous, but he is what he is,” Levin adds.The protests at UCLA have escalated as a countermovement of Israeli-supporting students saying “they have had a hell of enough of this,” Levin explains, noting that the mainstream media is only playing video of the counterprotesters, ignoring the violent videos of the pro-Hamas protesters. “This is the kind of media we’re getting,” he says. “Spinning tales, trying to influence social media. It’s why I call them out all the time.”
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
1 y

Gold Star families unleash on Jen Psaki for lying about military ceremony to help Biden: 'Her useless a** wasn't even there'
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

Gold Star families unleash on Jen Psaki for lying about military ceremony to help Biden: 'Her useless a** wasn't even there'

Gold Star families are furious with MSNBC host Jen Psaki.In her new book, Psaki claimed that President Joe Biden did not look at his watch during the dignified transfer ceremony for American soldiers killed during his disastrous Afghanistan withdrawal. 'Her useless a** wasn't even there. We were.'According to Axios, Psaki claimed that Biden "looked at his watch only after the ceremony had ended."But that's not true.In fact, an Associated Press photographer snapped two different photos of the president looking at his watch during the ceremony at Dover Air Force Base. The photos were taken 10 minutes apart. Biden, according to a USA Today fact-check, looked at his watch at least three separate times during the ceremony. SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty ImagesDespite the facts, Psaki attacked her former boss' critics in her book, arguing they engaged in "misinformation" to smear Biden and make "him appear insensitive, concerned only about how much time had passed." Psaki levied these accusations despite the fact that she was not on the tarmac that day.Gold Star families respondSteve Nikoui — the father of Marine Lance Cpl. Kareem Nikoui who was arrested for shouting during the State of the Union — said that Psaki's "outright lie" is painful."It hurts to have the former White House press secretary state an outright lie for no other reason than to score, for the Democrat Party, political points at the expense of our kids’ lives and their service to their country," Nikoui told Townhall."I witnessed it with my own eyes. She is a perfect example of the administration: all lies and false propaganda," he added.Mark Schmitz, the father of Marine Lance Cpl. Jared Schmitz, told Townhall that what Psaki "wrote was absolutely disgusting and clearly only for political and financial gain at the expense of grieving Gold Star families.""Her useless a** wasn’t even there. We were," he added, threatening legal action against Psaki and her publisher.Darin Hoover, father of Marine Staff Sgt. Taylor Hoover, told Townhall that Psaki needs to be canceled."In the age of cancel culture, she needs to be canceled," he said. "She's trying to rewrite history and make money off of our kids’ backs and their legacy, and we will not stand for it. I'm calling on NBC, MSNBC, and Simon and Schuster, the publishers, to terminate Psaki for those lies."Christy Shamblin, mother-in-law of Marine Sgt. Nicole Gee, also slammed Psaki as "disgraceful."What's next?After being called out, Psaki told Axios the "the detail in a few lines of the book about the exact number of times he looked at his watch will be removed in future reprints and the ebook."Psaki responded to inquiries about the lie only after Axios published its story, the outlet reported.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 64295 out of 91052
  • 64291
  • 64292
  • 64293
  • 64294
  • 64295
  • 64296
  • 64297
  • 64298
  • 64299
  • 64300
  • 64301
  • 64302
  • 64303
  • 64304
  • 64305
  • 64306
  • 64307
  • 64308
  • 64309
  • 64310
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund