YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #astronomy #florida #nightsky #biology #moon #plantbiology #terrorism #trafficsafety #animalbiology #gardening #assaultcar #carviolence #stopcars #autumn #notonemore
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

BlabberBuzz Feed
BlabberBuzz Feed
1 y

TOTAL Perversion: Mainstream Democrats PUSH To Decriminalize THIS, And They Have Kamala's Support...
Favicon 
www.blabber.buzz

TOTAL Perversion: Mainstream Democrats PUSH To Decriminalize THIS, And They Have Kamala's Support...

Like
Comment
Share
The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
1 y

“Wheel Of Fortune” Host Pat Sajak Is Coming Out Of Retirement!
Favicon 
www.inspiremore.com

“Wheel Of Fortune” Host Pat Sajak Is Coming Out Of Retirement!

Just one month after Pat Sajak signed off as the longtime host of Wheel of Fortune, he announced a comeback. On July 10, ABC shared that Pat will be coming out of retirement this fall to host the next season of Celebrity Wheel of Fortune. In a press release, the network wrote that Pat Sajak will helm the wheel beginning Oct. 7, and the season will be his “final spin” with the franchise. The iconic game show host took over for the original Wheel of Fortune host, Chuck Woolery, in 1981 and remained on the series for 41 straight years. He had planned on retiring from television following the June 7th installment of Wheel of Fortune. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Wheel of Fortune (@wheeloffortune) “Well, the time has come to say goodbye,” he said during the final moments of the show. “I have a few thanks and acknowledgments before I go. And I want to start with all of you watching out there. It’s been an incredible privilege to be invited into millions of homes night after night, year after year, decade after decade.” Ryan Seacrest “Humbled To Be Stepping Into The Footsteps” Of Pat Sajak A few weeks after Pat’s finale, ABC announced that Ryan Seacrest would take his place on Wheel of Fortune when Season 24 kicks off  “I’m truly humbled to be stepping into the footsteps of the legendary Pat Sajak,” Ryan wrote on Instagram after the news broke. “I can say, along with the rest of America, that it’s been a privilege and pure joy to watch Pat and Vanna on our television screens for an unprecedented 40 years, making us smile every night and feel right at home with them.” View this post on Instagram A post shared by Wheel of Fortune (@wheeloffortune) “Pat, I love the way you’ve always celebrated the contestants and made viewers at home feel at ease,” he added. “I look forward to learning everything I can from you during this transition.” You can watch Ryan’s freshman year on Wheel of Fortune weeknights on ABC beginning in September. Check your local listings for times. Pat Sajak’s Celebrity Wheel of Fortune will air on Monday nights on ABC at 9/8 C. This story’s featured image is by Joe Seer via Shutterstock. The post “Wheel Of Fortune” Host Pat Sajak Is Coming Out Of Retirement! appeared first on InspireMore.
Like
Comment
Share
The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
1 y

Expert tips and tricks to stop your sunscreen from pilling
Favicon 
www.optimistdaily.com

Expert tips and tricks to stop your sunscreen from pilling

BY THE OPTIMIST DAILY EDITORIAL TEAM Sunscreen is a vital component of any skincare regimen, but it can occasionally pill, resulting in tiny flakes or granules on the skin. This can be irritating and may discourage regular use. Understanding why sunscreen pills and how to avoid them might help you maintain good sun protection with less fuss.  The expert: Dr. Macrene Alexiades, a board-certified dermatologist and the founder of Macrene Actives, provides excellent insight into this topic. Dr. Alexiades, who holds three Harvard degrees in Biology, Medicine, and Genetics and has a successful private practice in New York, is certainly well-equipped to explain the science of sunscreen pilling and offer us practical solutions. What causes sunscreen pilling on the skin? “Pilling is when a product rubs off the skin in tiny flakes or granules,” says Dr. Alexiades. This can be due to improper application or formulation flaws in the sunscreen or underlying skincare products. Ingredients that cause pilling These ingredients are more likely to cause sunscreen to pill: – Silicones (dimethicone, amodimethicone, and cyclomethicone): These build a skin barrier to defend against environmental stressors, but they can cause the product to clump. – Xanthan Gum: Used as a thickening and stabilizer, it can cause pilling in high concentrations. – Carbomer: Prevents separation of oil and liquid components in sunscreens, but must be appropriately neutralized to prevent pilling. If pilling continues to be a problem, Dr. Alexiades recommends examining sunscreen labels for these ingredients. What is more likely to cause pilling: mineral or chemical sunscreens? Physical sunscreens with a high mineral content are more likely to pill, particularly when rubbed vigorously. Mineral sunscreens remain on the skin’s surface, but chemical sunscreens are absorbed, making them less likely to pill. How to keep sunscreen from pilling 1. Begin with a clean slate Always start with a clean face. Washing your face properly with a cleanser eliminates oils and pollutants, leaving a smooth surface for skincare products and sunscreen. 2. Exfoliate regularly Exfoliation eliminates dead skin cells that might impede product absorption, lowering the likelihood of pilling. Dr. Alexiades highlights the importance of this step in enhancing the efficacy of skincare and sunscreen. 3. Layer products properly Layering goods from thinnest to thickest improves absorption and prevents pilling. Begin with a toner or essence, then apply serums, moisturizer, then sunscreen. For people with oily skin, avoiding moisturizers and using a non-greasy sunscreen can be beneficial. 4. Allow time for absorption Dr. Alexiades suggests letting each skincare layer fully permeate before adding the next. “Allow each layer about ten minutes to absorb before applying sunscreen as the final step of their routine,” she advises. Remember to apply sunscreen at least 15 minutes before sun exposure. 5. Reapply sunscreen properly Choose a reapplication strategy that fits your lifestyle. SPF mists or sprays are useful for makeup wearers, while individuals who want to wear minimal makeup can use normal sunscreen or a sunscreen stick. Reapply every few hours to ensure maximum protection. 6. Check skincare ingredients If you have a problem with pilling, avoid beauty products that contain petrolatum, mineral oil, or wax. “These ingredients can be occlusive or form a film over your skin, preventing proper absorption and leading to pilling,” Dr. Alexiades explains. Understanding the reasons for sunscreen pilling and taking expert guidance will help you keep smooth, protected skin. It’s possible to integrate sunscreen into any skincare routine without pilling by choosing the right products, applying them correctly, and giving the products adequate time to be absorbed into the skin. Now that you’re armed with a thorough understanding of the underlying reasons behind sunscreen pilling, you can take the proper steps and enjoy smooth, protected skin throughout the day.The post Expert tips and tricks to stop your sunscreen from pilling first appeared on The Optimist Daily: Making Solutions the News.
Like
Comment
Share
The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
1 y

Bionic leg breakthrough: mind-controlled prosthetics transform mobility for amputees
Favicon 
www.optimistdaily.com

Bionic leg breakthrough: mind-controlled prosthetics transform mobility for amputees

BY THE OPTIMIST DAILY EDITORIAL TEAM MIT researchers made a significant advancement in prosthetic technology by producing a bionic limb that can be controlled directly by the wearer’s brain impulses. This device promises to greatly improve amputees’ quality of life by delivering a more natural and responsive walking experience. Unparalleled mobility and natural gait The cutting-edge prosthetic, described in a paper published in the journal Nature Medicine, greatly enhances walking speed and adaptability for its wearers. The “neuroprosthetic” increased walking speed by 41 percent over traditional prostheses, allowing peak speeds equivalent to those of people without leg amputations. Furthermore, this incredible prosthetic limb can adjust in real time to different situations, such as slopes, stairs, and restricted passageways. “This is the first prosthetic study in history that shows a leg prosthesis under full neural modulation, where a biomimetic gait emerges,” said Hugh Herr, co-director of the MIT Center for Bionics and himself a double amputee. “No one has been able to show this level of brain control that produces a natural gait, where the human’s nervous system is controlling the movement, not a robotic control algorithm.” Advanced surgical techniques and technology integration The study included seven individuals who had an experimental procedure known as “agonist antagonist myoneural interface” (AMI). This method enables patients to accurately feel the position, speed, and torque of their limbs. Unlike conventional prosthetics, which rely on robotic controllers and have limited spatial awareness, AMI surgery allows muscles in the residual limb to communicate organically with each other. The team released a video that shows just how naturally the user moves with the prosthetic. The bionic leg recognizes brain signals transmitted to the residual limb and converts them into movement. This direct neurological link creates a more natural and intuitive gait. “Because of the AMI neuroprosthetic interface, we were able to boost that neural signaling, preserving as much as we could,” noted Hyungeun Song, principal author and MIT Media Lab postdoc. “This was able to restore a person’s neural capability to continuously and directly control the full gait, across different walking speeds, stairs, slopes, even going over obstacles.” Improved quality of life The implications of this technology go beyond simple mobility. “Not only will they be able to walk on a flat surface, but they’ll be able to go hiking or dancing because they’ll have full control over their movement,” Herr told The Guardian. This increased control over mobility can significantly improve amputees’ overall quality of life, allowing them to participate in a broader range of activities. “This work represents yet another step in us demonstrating what is possible in terms of restoring function in patients who suffer from severe limb injury,” said Matthew Carty, coauthor and associate professor at Harvard Medical School. Personal commitment to innovation Herr, who lost both of his legs in a blizzard in 1982, is particularly interested in the technology’s success. He has expressed a desire to get the procedure and use the new prosthetic himself. “When I walk, it feels like I’m being walked because an algorithm is sending commands to a motor, and I’m not,” he told The Washington Post. Herr is considering getting revision surgery to equip himself with similar bionic legs “in the coming years,” as he mentioned to The Guardian. A bright future for prosthetics The advancement in prosthetic technology is a key step toward improving amputees’ movement and autonomy. By directly combining brain impulses with prosthetic movement, MIT researchers’ neuroprosthetic limb presents a hopeful future in which amputees can reach unparalleled degrees of natural movement and control.The post Bionic leg breakthrough: mind-controlled prosthetics transform mobility for amputees first appeared on The Optimist Daily: Making Solutions the News.
Like
Comment
Share
Living In Faith
Living In Faith
1 y

A Prayer When it Feels Like You Don't Have Enough Grace for the Day - Your Daily Prayer - July 11
Favicon 
www.ibelieve.com

A Prayer When it Feels Like You Don't Have Enough Grace for the Day - Your Daily Prayer - July 11

It can be hard to accept the free gift of grace when we don’t feel like we deserve it. But in Jesus' kingdom, we do not live by the world's rules of deserving or undeserving.
Like
Comment
Share
Living In Faith
Living In Faith
1 y

Don’t Let Nietzsche Be Your Political Teacher
Favicon 
www.thegospelcoalition.org

Don’t Let Nietzsche Be Your Political Teacher

Nietzsche wrote in his book The Anti-Christ, “What is good? All that heightens the feeling of power, the will to power, power itself in man.” This is a poignant example of what Augustine termed “the city of man” and “love of self, even to the point of contempt for God,” which is in stark contrast to “love of God, even to the point of contempt for self, [which] made the heavenly city.” Indeed, Nietzsche knew he was presenting an opposing vision for humanity and society, hence the title of his book. While Augustine’s vision for a society shaped by the city of heaven still influences both the left and right of America’s political spectrum, we have in significant ways become more and more children of Nietzsche. He has become our teacher. Here are three dynamics of Nietzsche’s philosophy influencing our politics today and some suggestions for how those living for the heavenly city might respond to a political world so influenced by him. Thirst for Power Nietzsche taught a hermeneutic (a way of seeing the world) predicated on power: “My idea is that every specific body strives to become master of all space, and to extend its power (its will to power), and to thrust back everything that resists it.” The political left increasingly sees the world this way. There’s a strong concern for equalizing power imbalances and promoting liberty by removing roadblocks to social groups who lack power. These goals may be admirable, but theories have arisen alongside them with moorings in Nietzsche’s and Marx’s philosophies that view people through intersections of power and advocate a reversal of social power dynamics. And while the political right may see itself in opposition to such an approach, populism’s rise suggests otherwise. For Nietzsche, the embodiment of the will to power was the Übermensch (the Overman or Superman), who embodied the ideals we now see played out in populist leaders. Populism portrays “the people” (the populus) as weakened by corrupt powers—“elites” at the top of society—and by those coming into the populus from outside. Complex social issues are typically reduced to this corrupting/weakening narrative, with the Übermensch the one person who “says it as it is,” offering to clean things up and restore the people’s strength. If this sounds familiar, that’s the point. Even when it has some explanatory use, seeing things through lenses of power can’t chart a constructive way forward. Power reduces everything to a zero-sum game. We’d do well to reflect on the bloody regimes of the 20th century that, whether underpinned by Nietzsche or Marx, saw the world this way. The gospel is a hermeneutic of love, not selfish power. The foundational reality in the universe is Christ, “who, though he was in the form of God [and equal in power], did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant” (Phil. 2:6). Christ laid down his life for the sake of others, loving us supremely through his sacrifice on the cross. Christians should reject a “win at all costs” and a “winners and losers” mentality. Loving others isn’t the same as affirming everything about them; instead, love is seeking their good, which may require gracious disagreement. However, when we see the world through a way of love, we can envision a future of mutual flourishing for all, not just for the winners. Distortion of Truth One of the problems with power being the bottom line is that it distorts truth. Nietzsche wrote in his Notes, “Against that positivism which stops before phenomena, saying ‘there are only facts,’ I should say: no, it is precisely facts that do not exist, only interpretations.” The gospel of Jesus Christ is a hermeneutic of love, not power. What was “true” for Nietzsche was the interpretation of the group in power. This gives rise to a hermeneutic of suspicion. If politicians talk about the “flourishing of society,” we don’t think they mean what they say; it’s just a rhetorical mask that manipulates people into believing those who want to increase their power. And it’s not just politicians—we also become suspicious of one another. This erodes relationships and the very foundations of civil dialogue. We should be alarmed by the rise of fake news, the blurring of boundaries between reporting and commenting on the news, social media echo chambers, and the prevalence of both sides of the political spectrum adopting tactics once reserved for propaganda in totalitarian regimes. The apostle John describes Jesus as “full of grace and truth” (John 1:14). His grace and truth are fully revealed at the cross, where the objective and stubborn “truth” about our sin and his amazing grace meet. When we believe this, we can be charitable to others while pursuing truth. We can seek to see the best in them while not being naive: If sin and our propensity to deception are so serious that Jesus had to die, how can we be naive? But if Jesus died to extend his grace to us, how can we not be charitable? Charity will look like seeking to understand others and fostering good dialogue, not because people never have ulterior motives but because we’re secure enough in Christ not to default to cynicism. Erosion of Morality Like the erosion of truth, a hermeneutic of power relativizes morality. Morals are seen as mere values those in power impose on others. Nietzsche wrote, “The distinctions of moral values have either originated in a ruling caste, pleasantly conscious of being different from the ruled—or among the ruled class, the slaves and dependents of all sorts.” Nietzsche concluded from this view that Judeo-Christianity was a “slave morality” that was harmful because it weakened society. Similarly today within large parts of the political left, Judeo-Christian ethics like the rights of the unborn and those with disabilities (and increasingly the rights of the elderly), the fixed reality of biological sex, and Christian sexual norms aren’t just viewed as outdated but dangerous, inhibiting our march to “progress.” However, the relativizing of ethics also grips large swaths of the right who are too prone to overlook the character failings of populist leaders and who adopt aggressive and xenophobic rhetoric when describing those in their political crosshairs. In the U.K. (my home context) in 2018, Boris Johnson described Muslim women wearing burkas and niqabs as looking like “bank robbers” and “letterboxes,” incurring the ire of liberals but strengthening his appeal to his populist base. Similar examples abound in the U.S. during the last two political cycles. How can we respond? If we live for a heavenly city marked by a love of God and others, morality can never be merely a function of power; power must serve love and the flourishing of humanity. This doesn’t mean we can expect people to agree with Christian morals, but we should be confident that, far from being dangerous, the Christian ethic is the path to flourishing. If we live for a heavenly city marked by a love of God and others, morality can never be merely a function of power. At the same time, we need to be acutely aware of the terrible irony that it undermines our witness to gloss over (or even justify) the moral failings of politicians who advance, in some areas, a Judeo-Christian ethical position. Humility, gentleness, self-control, honesty, and charity are to be praised in leaders with whom we disagree. In the same way, pride, aggression, anger, deceit, and self-aggrandizement should be lamented and called out in leaders, even in those with policies we support. Love, Not Power We’d do well to heed Augustine’s warning and exhortation: While some steadfastly continued in that which was the common good of all, namely, in God Himself, and in His eternity, truth, and love; others, being enamored rather of their own power, as if they could be their own good . . . became proud, deceived, envious. The cause, therefore, of the blessedness of the good is adherence to God. Or as Micah puts it, “He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the LORD require of you? To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God” (Mic. 6:8, NIV).
Like
Comment
Share
Living In Faith
Living In Faith
1 y

Think Biblically About Relational Boundaries
Favicon 
www.thegospelcoalition.org

Think Biblically About Relational Boundaries

We’ve all felt wounded or taken advantage of by the way another person has treated us. It can be hard to know how to respond, especially when this is a pattern. Some relationships are more challenging than others, some seasons are more full, and some people require a great deal of effort to be in relationship with. According to common wisdom, establishing boundaries to prevent burnout is necessary, and this makes sense on the surface. But as a Christ-follower, how does it fit with Jesus’s instruction to take up your cross (Matt. 16:24)? To save your life by losing it (v. 25)? To be a servant (Mark 10:42–45)? The call to be humble (Phil. 2:3), self-sacrificing (Rom. 12:1; Heb. 13:16), and others-oriented (Phil. 2:4; Luke 6:31) is so consistent in the Bible that it’s clearly meant to be more than an occasional practice. It’s a way of living that Jesus calls us to emulate. However, Jesus also says things like “Come to me, all who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest” (Matt. 11:28–30). While sacrificial living isn’t something we’re only called to occasionally, it also doesn’t fully define the life we’re offered in Christ. We are called to sacrifice, but we’re also offered spiritual abundance and rest for the weary soul. That’s why interpersonal boundaries are so challenging. Of course, in abuse situations, boundaries are necessary. But in many difficult relationships, discerning a Christlike response can be complicated. It can be hard to know how to respond when a family member has routinely rigid expectations, a friendship requires significant effort to maintain, or an acquaintance always interacts with you in ways that are challenging and frustrating. Boundaries can be primarily self-protective and self-oriented or promote relational, spiritual, and personal health. How can we know the difference? Let’s consider our motives through two lenses. Lens of Loving Others Well Often when we talk about boundaries, we focus primarily on our felt needs. We put up walls to guard and protect our space, our emotions, and our sense of security. But the Bible doesn’t encourage us to prioritize our comfort, desires, or protection above caring for others. A biblical perspective compels us to create boundaries based on what’s loving to the other person. The Bible doesn’t encourage us to prioritize our comfort, desires, or protection above caring for others. The most loving response isn’t necessarily to give the person what she wants. For example, we shouldn’t be culpable in someone’s sin—we shouldn’t facilitate or enable it. If someone is mistreating you or other people, your response should attempt to prevent her from continuing that behavior. Loving others may mean establishing healthy boundaries rather than enabling habitually sinful and destructive behavior. We’re called to demonstrate grace and truth in our relationships. But most often, we act with one more than the other. We may tend to be nice and overlook sin (sometimes inaccurately deemed “showing grace”) or to be brutally honest and then slam the door in someone’s face (sometimes our perspective of “truth”). Or perhaps we avoid difficult people altogether. Jesus, however, simultaneously embodied grace and truth, and he calls us to do the same. We need to see ourselves as fellow sinners and recipients of God’s grace. This shapes our response to the difficult person, allowing our interactions to have a redemptive tone. Loving others doesn’t require us to completely trust someone who has broken our trust, but it does require us to consider setting boundaries that will benefit him rather than focusing on making our lives more comfortable. Lens of Stewardship We must steward well the gifts and body God has given us by considering the effects of a difficult situation or relationship on our health and well-being. But the goal isn’t to avoid all physical or emotional hardship; it’s to care for our bodies so we can use them to serve, love, and obey God. This means that unless we’re disobeying what the Bible clearly says, there’s room for discretion. If a relationship produces significant dysfunction in our lives, it may be wise to consider whether additional boundaries would help us better steward our physical and emotional resources. But the presence of dysfunction isn’t a license to respond sinfully, nor an automatic reason to set a boundary. If someone’s behavior is weighing on me to the point that I struggle to sleep, for example, I can’t ignore the person simply because I’m not sleeping well. Instead, I need to prayerfully consider what following Jesus in this relationship might look like and how I can best steward the resources God has given me. What’s most helpful about the stewardship lens is that it allows for redemptive sacrifice. When a relationship is stressful or difficult, expending myself sacrificially might be the best way to use my resources for God’s glory. We need wisdom here, but the example we often see in the Bible is people willing to pursue God’s kingdom at great cost to themselves (John 15:13; 1 John 3:16; Mark 10:45). In difficult relationships, it may be helpful to ask, When I put up boundaries (or live completely outside them), whose kingdom am I building? Sometimes a boundary is necessary because I’m condoning or facilitating problematic patterns. But sometimes the sacrifices, the difficult relationship’s effects on my life, are worth the cost. They’re part of taking up my cross and bearing another’s burden. The stewardship lens allows me to consider that God may call me to do something incredibly difficult. Just because something is costly doesn’t mean it’s wrong—Jesus proved this for us. What’s Wise? These two lenses are helpful, but perhaps they leave you with more questions than answers. How do you determine what’s wise, best, and most glorifying to God? I suggest the following: Pray for wisdom. God promises wisdom to those who ask in faith (James 1:5–6). Consider what response is most loving to the other person. How can you respond in a way that’s full of grace and truth? What will be most helpful and redemptive? What will represent Christ to this person? Consider what the Bible clearly says about relationships. Many passages highlight godly responses when treated poorly by others. How might these apply to your situation? Consider your limitations. How can you steward the life God has given you to be most honoring and glorifying to him? Some costs honor him; some could be foolish or even detrimental. Remember personal discomfort isn’t a good reason to avoid an action that honors God and loves others well. How might God be using difficult relationships to grow you in Christlikeness? Seek godly counsel (Prov. 11:14; 15:22; 19:20). You don’t have to figure it all out alone. Let the body of Christ help you. Sometimes the sacrifices, the difficult relationship’s effects on my life, are worth the cost. Because people are complex, determining how to respond to human brokenness is also complex. There are no easy answers. But there should be a difference between our culture’s assumptions about boundaries and how we pursue them as Christ’s followers. Rather than focusing on our comfort or protection, we should consider our choices through the lens of loving God and loving others. Despite my failures, I’m convinced this is the way of following Jesus. May God grow us to look continually more like Jesus—with wisdom, grace, truth, and a willingness to sacrifice our comforts for his name’s sake.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Caller Feed
Daily Caller Feed
1 y

Several Uruguay Players Climb Into Stands, Get Into Gargantuan Brawl With Colombia Fans After Copa América Semifinal
Favicon 
dailycaller.com

Several Uruguay Players Climb Into Stands, Get Into Gargantuan Brawl With Colombia Fans After Copa América Semifinal

Usually this happens in Europe or South America ... this was in the United States
Like
Comment
Share
Hot Air Feed
Hot Air Feed
1 y

Were More People Killed in the Name of God or in the Name of Equality?
Favicon 
hotair.com

Were More People Killed in the Name of God or in the Name of Equality?

Were More People Killed in the Name of God or in the Name of Equality?
Like
Comment
Share
Science Explorer
Science Explorer
1 y

The Mystery of Lost City of Cahokia's Abandonment Just Got Even Deeper
Favicon 
www.sciencealert.com

The Mystery of Lost City of Cahokia's Abandonment Just Got Even Deeper

What exactly happened here?
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 64663 out of 98380
  • 64659
  • 64660
  • 64661
  • 64662
  • 64663
  • 64664
  • 64665
  • 64666
  • 64667
  • 64668
  • 64669
  • 64670
  • 64671
  • 64672
  • 64673
  • 64674
  • 64675
  • 64676
  • 64677
  • 64678
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund