YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #virginia #biology #loonylibs #plantbiology #gardening #autumn #animalbiology #fallcolors #fall #lakeburke #lake #burkelakepark #autumnleaves #fall2025 #mallard
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Daily Wire Feed
Daily Wire Feed
1 y

NY School District Apologizes For ‘Exclusionary Language’ Around Event For Non-White Students
Favicon 
www.dailywire.com

NY School District Apologizes For ‘Exclusionary Language’ Around Event For Non-White Students

A New York school district is apologizing for the “exclusionary language” it used to promote an event for non-white students. The Ithaca City School District advertised this year’s Students of Color Summit by saying the event was for “students of color in grades 6-12.” However, the school district ultimately welcomed students of all races at the event, which was held on Friday at Ithaca High School. “Please know that SOCU is open to all of our secondary students. We apologize for any previous communication that included exclusionary language about the event,” the Ithaca City school district’s communications staff wrote in an email to students and staff. The event was flagged a few days beforehand by the Equal Protection Project, a nonprofit that says it opposes racial discrimination in any form. The group sent a scathing letter to the school district’s superintendent and school board president. “We are deeply troubled to learn of a program in the Ithaca City School District (ICSD) which appears to segregate students by race,” the letter read. The group’s letter claimed an email was set by staffers saying the event was “for students of color to interact with each other” and that “allies” were not invited. CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP “We understand in this context that the word ‘allies’ refers to white students and staff. In fact, the message goes on to invite only non-white staff, stating: ‘If you are a staff member of color and would like to attend the summit with our students, please email,'” the letter states. The letter also said the school district has held Students of Color Summits in previous years that appeared to exclude white students. The group accused the school district of violating the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits racial discrimination by schools receiving federal funds. The Equal Protection Project requested that the school district “publicly denounce and renounce past and planned segregationist programs, and open up the upcoming SOCU Summit to all students and staff without regard to race.” “At EqualProtect.org, we reject the claim that there is a ‘good’ form of racism, or that the remedy for racism is more racism,” said William Jacobson, founder of the watchdog group. “These principles are embodied in the law and ICSD policies. Why were such policies not followed? ICSD should be transparent and open about how this situation came about,” Jacobson said. Superintendent Dr. Luvelle Brown also said the district would segregate students at the event and called the event a “safe space.” “This is something that our young people have led and have developed because they want a safe space and they want other people to see what that space looks like, too,” Brown said Tuesday in a video posted by the school district. “I would hope that it would be every day we’d have this kind of event, but it does not happen every day because of the supremacy and the lack of people seeing (our) humanity, and some folks leading with ‘your schools are failing,'” Brown added.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Wire Feed
Daily Wire Feed
1 y

Sen. Hawley Blasts Biden Admin For Giving ‘De Facto Amnesty’ To Illegal Immigrants
Favicon 
www.dailywire.com

Sen. Hawley Blasts Biden Admin For Giving ‘De Facto Amnesty’ To Illegal Immigrants

United States Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) tore into the Biden administration over its decision to cancel the asylum proceedings for more than 350,000 migrants, a move that the Republican Senator called “de facto amnesty.” Hawley’s letter comes in the wake of reports revealing that over 350,000 migrants who applied for asylum have had their cases quietly canceled since 2022, allowing them to remain in the United States indefinitely. Those who’ve had their cases canceled are no longer tracked to immigration authorities and are not subject to deportation. “I write with alarm that your Department once again appears to be circumventing its duty to enforce immigration laws,” Hawley wrote in his letter to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), condemning the organization for “granting de facto amnesty to hundreds of thousands of illegal migrants.” “These migrants are then no longer required to check in with authorities and can pursue other avenues to obtain legal status and remain in the country,” the Senator went on to explain. “Let’s be clear: granting mass amnesty to illegal migrants contradicts any Biden Administration claim that it is now somehow getting ‘tough’ on the border. You must immediately reverse course and put an end to your covert mass amnesty program.” “In other words, you have created a mass de facto amnesty program that shields migrants from deportation,” Hawley went on to add, also saying that the move “poses grave threats to the safety and security of the American people.” Hawley posed a number of questions to the DHS, asking “what, if anything, is your Department doing to track the hundreds of thousands of migrants who have had their asylum cases closed without a merits decision?” as well as “how many migrants who have had their asylum cases closed have then committed crimes in the United States?” “The closed cases pertain to migrants who did not have a criminal record, but ICE officers have reported to news outlets an increase in cases of migrants committing crimes after their asylum cases have been closed,” Hawley stated, pointing to recent violent crimes allegedly committed by illegal immigrants like the murder of Laken Riley and the shooting of two New York City Police officers. The Senator also asked how many migrants who’ve had their asylum cases closed have gone on to apply for visas, temporary protected status, or the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). The vast majority of those who’ve applied for asylum, 77 percent, have been allowed to remain in the United States under the Biden administration. Meanwhile, the current asylum backlog is more than 3.5 million. The Biden administration has presided over an unprecedented border crisis, with authorities recording over 9.5 million nationwide encounters and 1.7 million estimated illegal immigrant gotaways during his term. The foreign-born population residing in the U.S. has also reached a record high of 51.6 million people under Biden, with the massive increase being driven primarily by mass illegal immigration.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Wire Feed
Daily Wire Feed
1 y

Parents Ask Supreme Court To Intervene In Their Battle Against Wisconsin School District’s Transgender Policies
Favicon 
www.dailywire.com

Parents Ask Supreme Court To Intervene In Their Battle Against Wisconsin School District’s Transgender Policies

A group of Wisconsin parents are asking the Supreme Court to intervene in their effort to overturn a district policy that allows parents to be kept in the dark if their child decides to identify as transgender.  The parents want the Supreme Court to recognize that they have standing to challenge an Eau Claire Area School District policy that does not require parents to be notified if their child decides to change names/pronouns or start using opposite sex facilities. Represented by the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty (WILL) and America First Legal asked the Supreme Court on Wednesday in a petition for writ of certiorari to allow it to challenge the Eau Claire policy.  “Thousands of school districts across our country have these policies,” WILL Deputy Attorney Luke Berg said in a statement obtained by The Daily Wire. “If parents cannot challenge them until after their children are harmed, they have no way to protect their kids other than pulling them from public school.” A lower federal court previously struck down an effort by the parents to challenge the policy, saying that they lacked standing because none of their children had yet been harmed by the policy. The parents say that their First Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment rights as well as their parental right to make decisions about the care, custody, and control of their children have been violated by the policy.  “When a school district adopts an explicit policy to usurp parental decision-making authority over a major health-related decision—and to conceal this from the parents—parents who are subject to such a policy have standing to challenge it,” the Wednesday legal filing from WILL said.  The school has stood by the policy, saying that the goal of the policy is to get the parents on board with their child’s change in gender identity. CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP “Is federal standing law so constrained that when a school district openly declares what it will do when a child expresses a desire to transition — that it will not only make the decision for parents about whether that is in the child’s best interest, but will also hide it from them — parents are powerless to challenge that policy until after their children have been harmed by it, hope they discover it, and even then, good luck overcoming all the other obstacles?” the filing added.  Parents across the country have pushed for more transparency at public schools, especially pushing back against policies that allow a child’s so-called “gender transition” to be hidden from the parents.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Wire Feed
Daily Wire Feed
1 y

Guilty Verdict Could End Up Being A 2024 Trump Card
Favicon 
www.dailywire.com

Guilty Verdict Could End Up Being A 2024 Trump Card

The guilty verdict in former President Donald Trump’s hush-money trial in Manhattan has shaken up the 2024 White House race in some ways and failed to move the needle in others. It remains to be seen whether the result will help determine a winner in his expected rematch against President Joe Biden, but the Republican powerhouse is far away from no longer being competitive due to the case. A New York jury convicted Trump last Thursday on all 34 felony counts of falsifying business records to allegedly cover up payments in a bid to conceal a tryst with adult film star Stormy Daniels as part of a “catch-and-kill” scheme to influence the 2016 election. Trump, who denied the affair and pleaded not guilty to the charges, said he would be “appealing this scam.” Sentencing is scheduled for July 11. Steven Hirsch / New York Post / Bloomberg via Getty Images Within the first several hours of the verdict, GOP online payment processor WinRed temporarily crashed as Trump’s campaign website redirected to a page that sought donations, a sign that supporters were flooding the system. The Trump campaign later boasted $53 million was raised online within the first 24 hours, a large portion of its $141 million haul with the Republican National Committee (RNC) for the month of May. That figure dwarfs the $76 million they raised in April. It appears wealthy donors are warming up to Trump, and not just those in Republican circles. Shaun Maguire, a partner at venture capital firm Sequoia, announced last week after the verdict that he just gave $300,000 to Trump after backing Hillary Clinton in 2016 and not voting in 2020. Hedge fund manager Bill Ackman, who has supported Democrats in the past, is reportedly leaning toward Trump. Polls indicate the verdict did little to change public opinion. One from ABC News and Ipsos showed 50% of Americans think the guilty verdict was correct while 49% said they think Trump should end his campaign because of the conviction. However, Trump’s favorability remained fixed at 31% while Biden’s came in at 32%. Morning Consult noted Trump’s polling lead shrunk from 2 points to 1 point after the verdict. A Reuters/Ipsos poll found just one in 10 Republicans were less likely to vote for Trump after the guilty verdict. Trump’s prospective matchup against Biden remains very close. Three other criminal matters on the state and federal levels hang over Trump as he seeks re-election, prompting the former president to say he is the victim of a politically motivated “witch hunt.” It is not clear whether any of those cases will reach the trial stage before the November election. Still, they are certain to remain at the forefront as Trump’s allies rally behind a message of combating “lawfare.” House Republicans aim to “fight back” with “everything in our arsenal” against “political retribution in the court system to go after political opponents,” Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) announced over the weekend. They have a “three-pronged” plan that involves investigations, legislation, and funds. In the Democrat-led Senate, a band of Republican senators have vowed to do what they can to stand in the way of Biden’s agenda — including opposing his political and judicial nominees — to protest the prosecutions against Trump, though their ability to stop forward progress on their own is limited. Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT), a Republican who has spoken out against Trump during his time in Congress, told a staff writer for The Atlantic that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg “should have settled the case against Trump, as that would have been the normal procedure.” He added, “But he made a political decision. Bragg may have won the battle, for now, but he may have lost the political war. Democrats think they can put out the Trump fire with oxygen. It’s political malpractice.” Legal experts doubt the 77-year-old Trump will end up being placed behind bars given that he had no criminal record prior to the conviction, though the Secret Service has reportedly coordinated with local jail officials just in case. Possible alternatives to imprisonment include probation or community service. Because the presiding judge in the New York case picked a date for sentencing that falls just days before the Republican convention in Milwaukee, RNC chief told Newsmax this week that officials are preparing for the possibility that Trump will be in jail when he receives the party’s nomination.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Wire Feed
Daily Wire Feed
1 y

Court Pauses Georgia Election Case Against Trump, Likely Until After The 2024 Election
Favicon 
www.dailywire.com

Court Pauses Georgia Election Case Against Trump, Likely Until After The 2024 Election

A Georgia appellate court on Wednesday halted the 2020 election interference case against former President Donald Trump and his allies — during an appeal of a decision that allowed Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis to stay on the case. The Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia released a brief order staying the “underlying proceedings.” A tentative hearing date has been set for October 4, which combined with the pause all but assures a trial would not start before the November election. Judge Scott McAfee determined in March the defendants failed to prove a conflict of interest existed due to a romance between Willis and her special prosecutor in the case, Nathan Wade. However, the judge raised concerns about the “appearance of impropriety” and only allowed Willis to press forward after Wade resigned. Her other option was to step down. Trump and some of his co-defendants moved to appeal, arguing Willis should be disqualified and that the case should be dismissed. They claimed the romance flush with gifts and trips “created an appearance of impropriety in this case that cast a pall over these entire proceedings.” Willis then filed a motion insisting there was “no basis” to grant a review of the lower-court order. The Associated Press reported on Wednesday the appeals court, which agreed to hear the challenge a month ago, has until mid-March to issue a ruling and then the losing side would be able to seek relief from the Georgia Supreme Court. A trial date had not yet been set in the racketeering case, but CNN noted that Willis had hoped to have it before the 2024 election. Trump and 18 co-defendants pleaded not guilty to a bevy of charges in the Georgia case. Four have since taken plea deals. Toward the end of last month, Willis appealed McAfee’s decision to dismiss six of 41 counts lodged at Trump and his co-defendants. The judge had opined the “lack of detail concerning an essential legal element” in the dismissed charges was “fatal.” As Trump seeks a second White House term, the former president has broadly denied wrongdoing across multiple cases. A judge delayed a federal classified documents case trial indefinitely. The Supreme Court is considering an immunity question in a federal election case. Only one, an election-related “hush money” case in New York, has gone to trial. A jury found Trump guilty on all counts last week. Trump has vowed to appeal the decision. CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP Willis is seeking re-election herself this year. She won the Democratic primary last month by a wide margin, after which Wade showed up at the victory celebration that night. “Well consider me shook. At DA Willis’ campaign party in Buckhead and Nathan Wade just walked in. All smiles,” Atlanta Journal-Constitution reporter Tamar Hallerman posted to X with a photo.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Wire Feed
Daily Wire Feed
1 y

‘JUDGED by Matt Walsh’ Ep. 10:  Broken Promises Plus A Special Guest
Favicon 
www.dailywire.com

‘JUDGED by Matt Walsh’ Ep. 10: Broken Promises Plus A Special Guest

This season of “JUDGED by Matt Walsh” has certainly been a whirlwind. With unexpected twists and turns, hostile defendants, wacky plaintiffs, and even literal animals in the courtroom, it’s fair to say that viewers can never predict what they’re going to witness next. Of course, that’s half the fun. This week, Judge Walsh made wise and fair judgments on broken promises and busted lawnmowers, plus the bailiff debuted a special helper. First up for episode 10, Judge Walsh asked the bailiff about the small child who showed up to court wearing an adorable mini bailiff uniform. The bailiff said it was his nephew who he was babysitting and who wants to be a bailiff when he grows up. Wyatt, age 7, was the one who instructed the courtroom to rise for the Honorable Judge Walsh.  The bailiff told the judge he found the miniature bailiff uniform at “the bailiff store” which has a “kids section.” The plaintiff Mariah Woods began by stating her case, saying she was suing her friend, Lori McCrory, whom she claims had agreed to go on a trip to London with her. She described what happened next as a “harrowing experience.” The judge chastised Woods for calling the defendant a “loser,” reminding her that there was a child in the courtroom. “We don’t say loser,” Walsh advised the miniature bailiff. “This all started in 2023,” Woods said. “We always plan a friend trip like, we go to somewhere, we choose somewhere. But I am the planner. I’m the planner friend. I’m literally looking up, when is it hurricane season in this country? What are the flight prices going to be like?” The plaintiff added, “I literally take on a full-time job in addition to my full-time job.” When Judge Walsh mentioned he wasn’t surprised she was the “controlling and micromanaging” friend of the group, Woods replied, “Because if there isn’t somebody to micromanage and control … then things turn to chaos if we don’t have order.” Woods said when she and the defendant arrived in London, McCrory thought the hotel room was too small and decided to book her own. However, since the plaintiff said they discussed the room size and the defendant was shown photos in advance, she should still be responsible for paying her share, even though she wound up getting another room. The defendant next stated her side of the story. She said Woods had told her there was a free cancellation policy at the hotel up to and including their arrival time, meaning she shouldn’t owe anything. Woods said she was suing McCrory for $1,400, which included $700 for the hotel room cost and $700 for emotional damage. McCrory said she was counter-suing for emotional damage, claiming the plaintiff was “badgering” her via text, showing up at her work, and harassing her boyfriend in an attempt to collect the money she believed she was owed. The defendant was seeking $5,000 for her pain and suffering. “If I could make you all pay all of us $5,000 apiece for emotional damages, I would, for sitting through this,” Judge Walsh said as the courtroom erupted in laughter. Next, it was time for deliberations. When he returned, the judge began by addressing the junior bailiff.  “Wyatt, I want to apologize to you for the unruly behavior you’ve seen in this courtroom. I’m sure you would never act with your parents the way that these women have acted, would you?”  Wyatt nodded. “You would. You would act that way. Well, that didn’t make the point I was hoping you would make. Never mind,” he said. “Miss McCrory, usually I give a little speech here, but in this case, there’s not much to say,” Walsh continued.  Tune in to Episode 10 to discover the final verdict. The next case featured plaintiff Al Barney suing his former roommate for withholding a security deposit to cover the cost of lawn care, which he felt was done unfairly. Barney said when he moved in, he gave the defendant a $1,000 security deposit to cover any damages his dog would potentially cause. Barney said the former roommates had agreed to split the bills 50/50. He went on to explain how the defendant used to cut the grass himself but when the lawn mower died, he hired a lawn service. Barney said he personally only used a small portion of the home.  “I basically had a bedroom and a bathroom, and everything else was his, his decoration, his living situation,” Barney said. “It was his house originally, when I moved in, he was already there.” The testimony was interrupted by the bailiff noisily eating a snack, which Judge Walsh chastised him for.  “What else do you have?” the judge asked. “You got some M&Ms in your front pocket? Got some trail mix shoved up your ass? What?” The bailiff replied that he was carrying jelly beans “for dessert.” The bailiff shared his snack with the judge as Walsh said, “We don’t snack in the courtroom” and banged his gavel. The plaintiff next described his former roommate as a “clean freak” and said he didn’t feel comfortable spending time in the main living spaces because of it. Barney said for that reason, he didn’t think it was fair to have to pay for lawn care since they were splitting everything else.  When Barney decided to move out, he said the defendant kept his security deposit. He chose to sue for $1,000 to recoup that money. Next, defendant Matthew Steigelman insisted he didn’t owe Barney any of the money. He said neither roommate had time or inclination to mow the lawn. He also refuted Barney’s claim that he was a “tyrant” and brought up an incident of the plaintiff leaving a leftover bucket of Kentucky Fried Chicken sitting on the counter.  Judge Walsh questioned Steigelman on if he believed Barney did $1,000 worth of damage to the home. The defendant said no, the damage was minor, but he kept the money to offset the cost of the lawn care even though it hadn’t been part of the original rental charges when Barney moved in. After deliberations, the judge delivered a verdict.  “Mr. Barney, Mr. Steigelman, we’ve heard many details in this case. The problem is that few of the details have anything to do with anything,” Walsh said. “And none of the details have been especially interesting to me. You’ve committed the greatest crime of all in this courtroom, which is that you have bored me. And for that, I cannot forgive you.” Tune into episode 10 of “JUDGED” to hear the conclusion, plus catch a sneak peek of episode 11, which is all about dog fights and Halloween frights.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Wire Feed
Daily Wire Feed
1 y

Biden Demonstrates He’s A Vegetable
Favicon 
www.dailywire.com

Biden Demonstrates He’s A Vegetable

The president of the United States is a yam or a squash or some other sort of vegetable because he is no longer sentient. I say this after some consideration and after reading a very long interview that he did with Time Magazine. He’s on the cover of Time — which is basically a defunct magazine at this point — gazing out stonily, standing over the Resolute desk staring into the camera in black and white, with a headline reading, “If He Wins.” Time is doing its best to try and massage him through this campaign. In their piece behind the cover, they say, “In the time we spent with the President, he remembered long-ago encounters with historic figures ranging from Pope John Paul II to Henry Kissinger. He recalled the words of historian Jon Meacham, who told Biden after the President entered the Oval Office on Inauguration Day that the country had not been as divided since the days of Lincoln, nor the future of its democracy as challenged since those of FDR. The overall impression Biden left us with is one of a man in conversation with history, both the country’s and his own.” But when you read the interview, what you come away with is a president who’s in conversation with the walls, perhaps with his gruel. This president is no longer with us. That’s not just because he’s got all the wrong principles. It’s not just because he has effectively set America’s foreign policy on fire, while also lighting the jet fuel under the inflationary economy that Americans have been suffering through. The transcript of the interview exposes that he is no longer with us. Time did not release the tape of the interview, likely because he stumbles over himself. He is verbally what he is physically, such as when he attempted to climb up a flight of stairs into Air Force One. This matters — because the rest of the world can see it. We have been told by all of his allies that he is sharp as a tack, that he is razor-sharp, that this man is the most alert president we’ve ever had in meetings. We have been told that he is quizzing people fast, asking them about events, about times and places. According to his aides, he is so with it that they cannot keep up with this geriatric dotard. That’s not the impression from this interview. He covers several different topics in this extraordinarily long interview, and he falls apart in nearly every answer. WATCH: The Ben Shapiro Show The interview begins with him discussing American foreign policy. He says, “We are, we are the world power. And what I inherited, as a consequence of the mistake that we made in Afghanistan is a — was not a loss in Afghanistan, excuse my cold.” He continues, saying, “I’ve always believed that there are two elements to American security, and the biggest element and, and our normative example, is our alliances, our alliances.” “I’ve always believed that there are two elements to American security, and the biggest element and, and our normative example, is our alliances, our alliances,” he says. “We are — we have, compared to the rest of the world, we have put together the strongest alliance in the history of the world, number one. Number two, we’re in a situation where we are able to move in a way that recognizes how much the world has changed and still lead the world. And it’s our security. For example, the idea that if when Putin decided to go into Russia — I mean, he’s gonna go from Russia into Ukraine — the reason why I cleared the intelligence so we can release the information we knew that he was going to attack, was to let the world know we were still in charge.” Now, if you can follow that as an answer, you win $100 because that is absolutely nonsensical. In the course of one paragraph, Biden falls all over himself. He suggests that we did not lose in Afghanistan. He suggests we put together “the strongest alliance in the history of the world,” the alliance to take on Russia in Ukraine. But he says in the middle of this that Putin decided to go into Russia. Does this sound like a sentient president to you? Then, he pats himself on the back for his activity in Ukraine, saying he put NATO back together: “I did it. I did it. And we’re now the strongest nation. We have the strongest alliance in all of America, all of history. In the meantime, what we keep skipping over is what the consequence of the success of Russia in Ukraine would be. That’s why I brought this along. You probably haven’t read it. Most people haven’t read it. He says this is part of reestablishing the Soviet Union. That’s what this is all about. It wasn’t just about taking part of— He wanted, he wanted to go back to the, to the days when there was NATO and there was that other outfit that Poland, everybody belonged to.” “There was that other outfit that Poland, everybody belonged to.” Like a hockey team, or does he mean the Warsaw Pact? The fact that the President of the United States is old enough to actually remember the Warsaw Pact but cannot remember what it is called is not a good sign for his mentality going into an election where, if elected, he will finish his term at the age of 86. When asked what peace looks like in Ukraine, he answers, saying, “Peace looks like making sure Russia never, never, never, never occupies Ukraine. That’s what peace looks like. And it doesn’t mean NATO, they are part of NATO, it means we have a relationship with them like we do with other countries, where we supply weapons so they can defend themselves in the future. But it is not, if you notice, I was the one when — and you guys did report it at Time — the one that I was saying that I am not prepared to support the NATOization of Ukraine.” He’s not even speaking English. Forget about the bad policy. Forget about the fact that he has slow-walked aid to Ukraine, that only in the last week or so has he decided if we are going to ally ourselves with Ukraine sufficient to push the Russians back to lead to some sort of negotiation, perhaps we might want to supply them the weaponry to hit bases in Russia that are being used to target Ukraine. That’s been happening in the last two weeks, after two years of war. It’s not just that he’s wrong about everything. He is no longer with us. Next, he gets to Israel. And on Israel, he’s totally discombobulated because the moral math is extremely clear. An American ally, a democracy, was attacked on October 7 by an actual, honest-to-God terror group who murdered 1,200 people and took 250 hostages, and are hiding behind civilians, stealing humanitarian aid, and killing anyone who might govern the Gaza Strip after they’re gone. Joe Biden is having a supremely tough time with simply supplying Israel what they need to finish off Hamas, or even allowing Israel to finish off Hamas in the South so that they can turn north and push Hezbollah back. Hezbollah has gotten more aggressive; they have set a lot of northern Israel on fire. Over the course of the last 72 hours, Israel was able to put out those fires. Israel is also under attack from the Houthis in Yemen. They’re under attack from bases in Iraq and Syria. They’re under direct attack from Iran. They’re under attack on seven different fronts, minimum. But Biden believes the real threat is, of course, the Israeli government.  The Time Magazine interviewer asks, “So in Israel, obviously, a difficult time there. What steps are you prepared to take against Israel now that Netanyahu appears to have crossed your red line in Rafah, Mr. President?” The reality is that Israel did not cross Biden’s supposed red line in Rafah. And let’s be direct about this crossing of red lines of Joe Biden’s: It has no consequence. You’ll recall that Biden said there was a red line for Iran attacking Israel, and Iran did crossed it and not much happened. You’ll recall that Barack Obama once said there was a red line in Syria, and then Syria used chemical weapons. He did nothing. It turns out crossing Democratic red lines has no consequences.  But Biden’s brains are scrambled eggs. He answers, “I’m not going to speak to that now because you’re going to report this before I make, before— I’m in the process of talking with the Israelis right now. So I’m not going to . . .” Some back and forth then ensues, as Time attempts to have Biden clarify: Time: What does that mean? Biden: If I tell you, you’ll write it.  It’s not time for you to write it. Time: What are the nature of your conversations with the Israelis right now? Have you spoken with Bibi? Biden: I have not spoken with Bibi since— I have not spoken with Bibi since the attack on Sunday. Was it Sunday? Time: Yep. Sunday. Biden: I have not. My team has. Time: But has he crossed your red line? Biden: I’m not going to respond to that because I’m about to make a . . . anyway. He finishes the sentence with the word “anyway.” You might think to yourself, that’s not a complete sentence. You would be right. But don’t worry, there’s more. Time asks, “Whose fault is it that the deal, the ceasefire for hostages has not been consummated? Is it Hamas or Israel or both?” And Biden correctly says, “Hamas. Hamas could end this tomorrow. Hamas could say” — and the transcript then says “unintelligible.” The editor put “unintelligible” there. He put “unintelligible” in the transcript three times. Biden mixes up Iraq and Iran, and later, he mixes up Russia and China. There’s an actual editor’s note saying, “Biden appeared to mean XI here, not Putin.” Time asks, “You are 81 years old, and would be 86 by the time you left office. Large majorities of Americans, including in the Democratic Party, tell pollsters they think you are too old to lead. Could you really do this job as an 85-year-old man?” And Biden answers, “I can do it better than anybody you know. You’re looking at me; I can take you, too.” He threatens to fight the interviewer. Again, let’s be clear about this. Biden could not successfully fight a day-old head of cabbage. Not only would it disrupt his digestive system, leading to more clean-up on aisle five from his night nurse, but he also could not physically fight an inanimate object. He routinely loses to them, from teleprompters to staircases. But he’s threatening to fight people. Seems about right — for a yam.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Wire Feed
Daily Wire Feed
1 y

Women Aren’t Showing Up For Female-Led ‘Furiousa: A Mad Max Saga’
Favicon 
www.dailywire.com

Women Aren’t Showing Up For Female-Led ‘Furiousa: A Mad Max Saga’

The numbers show that women and young moviegoers just aren’t showing up for the female-led dystopian “Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga,” and it might mean the end of the franchise. The latest “Mad Max” film opened domestically over the long Memorial Day weekend and brought in a dismal $32 million at the box office, just barely beating the Chris Pratt-led “The Garfield Movie,” which earned $31 million that same weekend. Diving into the numbers, the Blaze News found that between the Charlize Theron-Tom Hardy 2015 “Mad Max: Fury Road” and the newest one led by actress Anya Taylor-Joy, fewer women and young moviegoers turned out to watch the George Miller-directed film. In 2015, the film’s opening weekend saw a 40% female audience, compared to the latest opening weekend, which only saw 29% female viewership, the outlet noted. At the same time, the film also failed to attract the coveted age demographic of ages 18-24, with only 21% turning up to watch the latest “Mad Max” film compared to 31% who trekked to the theaters in 2015, the outlet noted. ‘Mad Max’ franchise likely put on hold after ‘Furiosa’ flop sees far fewer female viewers than it hoped https://t.co/cPoMtQtxnU pic.twitter.com/iRmL2ilac3 — TheBlaze (@theblaze) June 4, 2024 Ahead of the release, Miller talked about the franchise’s future and made it clear there are more stories to tell based on how the latest film does. “There’s certainly more stories there,” Miller told the press at the annual Cannes Film Festival. “Maybe because in order to tell the story of ‘Fury Road,’ we needed to know about ‘Furiosa’ and Max in the years before.” “I’ll definitely see how this goes,” he added. CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP Entertainment Reporter Christian Toto told Blaze News that the film’s struggle “won’t kill the franchise. Hollywood clings to IPs[Intellectual Properties], even the ones that have stumbled or collapsed.” “See the ‘Terminator’ saga, which had not one but two duds before they took a knee. Still, a ‘Mad Max’ movie without Mad Max — or the actress who embodied the title character — is a tough sell,” he added. “Audiences increasingly know films are hitting video on-demand faster and faster these days. Just look at ‘The Fall Guy,’ already available for home viewing.” Over the weekend, the “Mad Max” film fell behind “The Garfield Movie” in first place and the live-action animated movie “IF” from John Krasinski in second. The Miller-directed film landed in the third spot as the film has continued to struggle since it opened on May 24 — earning just $10.7 million over the weekend to bring its gross total in the states to $49.7 million at the time of this publication. The movie cost $168 million to produce and in its second weekend out, it fell 59 percent in sales, as previously reported. Related: Box Office On Track To Have Worst Memorial Day Weekend Since 1995, ‘Garfield’ And ‘Furiosa’ Flounder
Like
Comment
Share
The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
1 y

“Anti-Bullying Gang” Shows Up In Droves To Support Teen Bullied For Brain Cancer
Favicon 
www.inspiremore.com

“Anti-Bullying Gang” Shows Up In Droves To Support Teen Bullied For Brain Cancer

A group called the “Anti-Bullying Gang” is making national headlines after they showed up at a Texas high school to support a teen who was being bullied for brain cancer. Tayden Ybarra, a 15-year-old sophomore at Katy High School has been battling astrocytoma since she was six. Over the years, she’s had two brain surgeries and is still in treatment today. According to her mother, Tammy Ybarra, Tayden has been dealing with bullying since her diagnosis. “She’s had kids making fun of her eyes, the way they cross. And she had one kid trip her,” she told Fox 26. “Kids will think it’s contagious or if they get close to me, they’ll get it somehow,” Tayden added. Someone reported Tayden’s situation to The Anti-Bullying Gang, which travels to schools across Texas to support victims. So they headed out to Katy High on March 13 to surprise Tayden and show solidarity. “Just finding out that she had cancer, and she had to deal with getting bullied,” the group’s founder, King Kyle Lee, told the publication. “I can’t even imagine going through something like that, then people making fun of you, picking on you.” View this post on Instagram A post shared by King Kyle Lee (@kingkylelee) Videos show a massive show of support with the group driving up to the school in luxury cars. “We pull up right to the front of the school. We make a big scene. I want the principal to come outside. I want the teachers to be looking out the windows,” he continued. The Anti-Bullying Gang Has Helped Over 50 Students Tayden had no idea that the group was heading out to visit her, and the show of support meant everything to her. The Anti-Bullying Gang was able to bring awareness to Tayden’s bullying. Then, they drove her home in a Lamborghini. “I was so surprised,” Tayden shared. “I was like whoa, those are a lot of nice cars, and they were all lined up and everything.”  The group has helped over 50 kids since its formation. According to King Kyle Lee, it only takes three minutes to get the faculty and students on board to help victims “We’re going to be there for them,” he added, “and do everything possible for them to feel safe, to let them know that somebody has their back, to let them know that they are loved.” You can find the source of this story’s featured image here. The post “Anti-Bullying Gang” Shows Up In Droves To Support Teen Bullied For Brain Cancer appeared first on InspireMore.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Caller Feed
Daily Caller Feed
1 y

Six Illegal Immigrants On State’s ’10 Most Wanted’ List Stand Accused Of Child Sexual Abuse
Favicon 
dailycaller.com

Six Illegal Immigrants On State’s ’10 Most Wanted’ List Stand Accused Of Child Sexual Abuse

'Texas is a law-and-order state'
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 65643 out of 95154
  • 65639
  • 65640
  • 65641
  • 65642
  • 65643
  • 65644
  • 65645
  • 65646
  • 65647
  • 65648
  • 65649
  • 65650
  • 65651
  • 65652
  • 65653
  • 65654
  • 65655
  • 65656
  • 65657
  • 65658
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund