YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #police #astronomy #florida #law #racism
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
News Feed (Home) Popular Posts Events Blog Market Forum
Media
Go LIVE! Headline News VidWatch Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore Offers
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Group

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

INFOWARS
INFOWARS
1 y

???#alexjonesshow Monday LIVE: Supreme Court Destroys Deep State Attempts to Steal Election From Donald Trump, Votes 9-0 Against Weaponized Judiciary!

WATCH NOW:

https://madmaxworld.tv/channel/the-alex-jones-show
https://www.infowars.com/posts..../the-american-journa

»»» Play #nwowars: http://AlexJonesGame.com

The Alex Jones Show
Favicon 
madmaxworld.tv

The Alex Jones Show

Watch The Alex Jones Show!
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
1 y

Is California’s Crony Command Economy Propping up Billionaires Over Bread Bakers?
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

Is California’s Crony Command Economy Propping up Billionaires Over Bread Bakers?

Advocates of command economies argue that government regulation of wages‚ prices‚ and production will lead to a more equitable allocation of income and wealth. But that’s hardly the case under California’s new fast-food command economy. An unusual exemption from California’s new $20 minimum wage requirement for fast food workers appears aimed at propping up at least one billionaire friend and donor of Gov. Gavin Newsom at the expense of the wages of bread bakers. In September 2023‚ California created a Fast Food Council within the Department of Industrial Relations and tasked it with developing minimum standards for fast-food employment related to training‚ working conditions‚ health and safety‚ and wages. The same law that created the council—Assembly Bill 1228—set a $20 per hour minimum wage for fast-food restaurant workers‚ beginning April 1‚ 2024. That’s $4 higher than California’s statewide $16 minimum wage. That minimum wage hike and all other regulations that the Fast Food Council imposes apply to all fast-food and limited-service restaurants that have at least 60 establishments nationwide.   But there’s one unusual exception: “Fast food restaurant” shall not include an establishment that on September 15‚ 2023‚ operates a bakery that produces for sale on the establishment’s premises bread … only where the establishment produces for sale bread as a stand-alone menu item‚ and does not apply if the bread is available for sale solely as part of another menu item. In plain English‚ this means that restaurants that were already in the practice‚ as of Sept. 15‚ 2023‚ of baking their own bread where customers could buy that bread by itself as a stand-alone product are exempted from the higher minimum wage‚ while other restaurants that also baked their own bread but used it in their sandwiches and other menu items and didn’t sell by itself are not exempted. This seems like a very specific and narrowly tailored part of the law. This exception most notably applies to Panera Bread franchises‚ including those owned by billionaire CEO Greg Flynn of the Flynn Restaurant Group that owns two dozen Panera Bread locations in California. Flynn reportedly attended the same high school as Newsom‚ has been involved in business deals with Newsom‚ and has donated at least $164‚800 to Newsom’s campaigns.   Newsom told reporters in January that the exemption was “part of the sausage-making” of writing laws. Now‚ while most national restaurant chains in the state will have to cope with a 25% wage hike‚ Panera Bread owners will be exempt from this and any other commands that the Fast Food Council rains down. From the perspective of command economy advocates who believe that government can effectively redistribute resources with little or no unintended consequences‚ this exemption equals a redistribution from bread bakers’ wages to a billionaire’s profits. In reality‚ there are greater economic forces at play. Bread bakers (and others working in bread-baking restaurants) could actually see benefits of the exemption through fewer lost jobs and lost benefits than they would see at restaurants that don’t get the exemption. For example‚ Pizza Hut‚ which does not have an exemption because its bread is not sold as a stand-alone product‚ already laid off 1‚200 workers in the state. Other companies are undoubtedly turning to automation to replace some workers. The benefits of the exemption could also mean fewer price increases for customers. Chipotle and McDonalds announced they will raise menu prices in California to pay for the wage hike. Whereas command economy mandates and crony exemptions allow politicians to pull the levers of production and wages‚ such manipulation results in a smaller and unlevel playing field. In a market economy‚ workers set the rate at which they are willing to provide their labor‚ employers set the rate they are willing to pay for labor‚ and if the employer’s rate is the same or higher than the worker’s‚ they enter into a mutually beneficial agreement. History demonstrates that people engaged in free exchange of their labor and resources produces greater widespread prosperity than political elites engaged in sausage-making. That’s why the centrally planned economies of Eastern Europe produced significantly lower family incomes and less freedom during the Cold War than predominantly market economies. It is also why they eventually collapsed. California’s crony command economy may be currently limited in scope to the fast-food sector‚ but this is presumably not the end of the Golden State’s heedless attempts to supposedly help workers. If politicians in California actually want to improve the wages of all workers—not just those at fast-food restaurants that didn’t serve fresh-baked bread as a stand-alone menu item on Sept. 15‚ 2023—they should focus on the only lasting way for people to earn higher wages‚ which is by them becoming more productive.To that end‚ California and other states could eliminate unnecessary licensing laws that prevent people from using skills they already have—like braiding hair‚ arranging flowers‚ or bartending—to earn a living. Policymakers should also expand educational opportunities by breaking down unnecessary regulations on apprenticeships. And reducing taxes and regulations on businesses would free up resources for employers—who report that labor quality and costs are their greatest struggles—to invest in their workers rather than government revenues and compliance. Have an opinion about this article? To sound off‚ please email letters@DailySignal.com‚ and we’ll consider publishing your edited remarks in our regular “We Hear You” feature. Remember to include the URL or headline of the article plus your name and town and/or state. The post Is California’s Crony Command Economy Propping up Billionaires Over Bread Bakers? appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
1 y

BREAKING: Supreme Court Rules 9-0 That Trump Can’t Be Removed From Colorado Ballot
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

BREAKING: Supreme Court Rules 9-0 That Trump Can’t Be Removed From Colorado Ballot

The Supreme Court ruled unanimously on Monday that former President Donald Trump couldn’t be removed from the 2024 primary ballot in Colorado. The case revolved around the issue of whether Trump could be removed from the ballot by the state under the “insurrection” clause of the 14th Amendment. “We conclude that States may disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold state office. But States have no power under the Constitution to enforce Section 3 with respect to federal offices‚ especially the Presidency‚” the Court wrote in its decision according to Fox News. Trump posted on Truth Social‚ “BIG WIN FOR AMERICA!” Trump’s counsel of record on the case‚ Harmeet K. Dhillon‚ made a statement about the decision: Today’s unanimous Supreme Court decision underscores the bedrock principles of our democracy and the rule of law. This victory is not just for President Trump but for the integrity of our electoral system and the rights of voters across the country. The attempt to use the 14th Amendment in this manner was a dangerous overreach that‚ if left unchallenged‚ could have set a perilous precedent for future election. We are proud to have defended the constitutional rights at stake and grateful for the Supreme Court’s unequivocal affirmation of these fundamental principles. Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold wrote on Twitter‚ formerly X‚ that she was “disappointed” with the Supreme Court’s decision. I am disappointed in the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision stripping states of the authority to enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment for federal candidates. Colorado should be able to bar oath-breaking insurrections from our ballot.— Jena Griswold (@JenaGriswold) March 4‚ 2024 “I am disappointed in the Supreme Court’s decision stripping states of the authority to enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment for federal candidates‚” she wrote. “Colorado should be able to bar oath-breaking insurrections from our ballot.” Heritage Foundation senior legal fellows Hans von Spakovsky and Charles Stimson praised the ruling a statement: “The Supreme Court justices brought order to what could have become a chaotic election season by shutting down this partisan‚ anti-democratic‚ and unconstitutional effort in Colorado. They found numerous constitutional and statutory reasons why the Colorado court got it wrong.“Activist courts and partisan bureaucrats should not be able to take away American voters’ right to choose the president. This ruling‚ which came together with amazing speed for the Supreme Court‚ should serve as a stern warning that radicals cannot interfere in our election process. Podcast host Keith Olbermann blasted the decision and called for abolishing the Supreme Court. “The Supreme Court has betrayed democracy‚” Olbermann wrote on X. “Its members including Jackson‚ Kagan and Sotomayor have proved themselves inept at reading comprehension. And collectively the ‘court’ has shown itself to be corrupt and illegitimate. It must be dissolved.” This is a breaking news story and will be updated. The post BREAKING: Supreme Court Rules 9-0 That Trump Can’t Be Removed From Colorado Ballot appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Reclaim The Net Feed
Reclaim The Net Feed
1 y

Dr. Phil Reveals Facebook Censored His Video on Child Trafficking at the Border
Favicon 
reclaimthenet.org

Dr. Phil Reveals Facebook Censored His Video on Child Trafficking at the Border

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties‚ subscribe to Reclaim The Net. In an interview on “The Breakfast Club‚” well-known radio and TV show show host‚ psychologist Dr. Phil McGraw‚ usually known as Dr. Phil‚ called out Facebook and Instagram for their censorship practices. He shared this during a conversation with the show’s host‚ Charlamagne tha God. Dr. Phil highlighted the significance of social media platforms in shaping public opinion‚ particularly among young Americans. Dr. Phil’s encounter with censorship began after he posted a video clip from his visit to the US-Mexico border on Facebook and Instagram. The clip‚ which quickly garnered tens of thousands of views‚ featured Dr. Phil discussing child trafficking. However‚ just 50 minutes after going live and experiencing rapid viral growth‚ the video was abruptly taken down. Dr. Phill stated: “I put a clip up of my trip to the border‚ just a small clip… I posted it up on Facebook and Instagram and it was the part of me talking to him about trafficking these children… It was up about 50 minutes and going viral super fast‚ I mean like tens of thousands of views in a matter of a few minutes‚ it was going straight vertical and then bang! It just stopped. It stopped and it got shut down. They just – the algorithm – they shut it down.” https://video.reclaimthenet.org/articles/dr-p-ctg2.mp4 Charlamagne‚ in response‚ shared a similar experience with The Breakfast Club content on YouTube. He pointed out that their politically charged videos often face restrictions due to the censorship algorithms embedded in various social media platforms. The post Dr. Phil Reveals Facebook Censored His Video on Child Trafficking at the Border appeared first on Reclaim The Net.
Like
Comment
Share
Reclaim The Net Feed
Reclaim The Net Feed
1 y

Biden Goes To Court‚ Demanding Warrantless Surveillance Powers
Favicon 
reclaimthenet.org

Biden Goes To Court‚ Demanding Warrantless Surveillance Powers

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties‚ subscribe to Reclaim The Net. A request by the Biden administration to the courts for the renewal of contentious warrantless surveillance powers‚ has stoked controversy. These surveillance powers‚ demanded by American intelligence agencies‚ are on the verge of expiration. Critics argue that this move either reflects business as usual‚ or reflects a sidestepping of spying reforms. According to US Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR)‚ the decision of the US Department of Justice to pursue an extension of the FISA Section 702 for a year without congressional consideration manifests a disregard for reforms aimed at safeguarding American rights. Related: FISA Court Shows the FBI Illegally Searched Data on a Senator‚ a State Senator‚ and a Judge  Expressing his criticism‚ Wyden offers an alternative legislation which he and other lawmakers proposed that seeks to maintain Section 702 surveillance albeit under strict regulations constraining unwarranted spying on Americans. Wyden is particularly irked by the White House’s direction to prosecutors to seek renewal of the FISA powers in court before his proposed alternative legislation could be wholly considered by Congress. Senator Wyden did not mince words in expressing his dissatisfaction with the approach of the Biden administration and the Justice department. “It is utterly ridiculous that the Biden Administration and the Justice Department would rather risk the long-term future of an important surveillance authority than support a single meaningful reform to protect Americans’ rights‚” he said. The contentious issue revolves around Section 702‚ an amendment to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act that allows US intelligence agencies to spy on foreigners considered a threat to national security. Despite the fact that this surveillance is meant for overseas intelligence targets‚ the incidental warrantless surveillance of US residents has prompted concerns among privacy advocates. The FBI’s past missteps of using Section 702 to snoop on various individuals ranging from US elected officials to campaign donors adds credence to these concerns. Section 702 is scheduled to lapse by April 19 unless Congress moves to renew it. This has led to a push among several lawmakers to alter the rules and add guards against potential future abuse. To keep it running‚ Congress had granted a four-month extension last year. There are currently four legislative proposals in the works to renew Section 702. Two of these initiatives‚ namely the Protect Liberty and End Warrantless Surveillance Act and the Government Surveillance Reform Act of 2023‚ entail a warrant requirement prior to investigations. The White House has resisted attempts to reform Section 702. The post Biden Goes To Court‚ Demanding Warrantless Surveillance Powers appeared first on Reclaim The Net.
Like
Comment
Share
Reclaim The Net Feed
Reclaim The Net Feed
1 y

House Republicans Seek Documents From Google on Alleged Government Influence in Biased AI Program Gemini
Favicon 
reclaimthenet.org

House Republicans Seek Documents From Google on Alleged Government Influence in Biased AI Program Gemini

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties‚ subscribe to Reclaim The Net. Under increasing scrutiny‚ Google is being pressed by US House Republicans to disclose any government influences that may have swayed the development of its controversial artificial intelligence program‚ Gemini. The application‚ recently criticized for its racist ideologies by refusing to depict white people‚ has been a hot topic and the cause of much criticism. The House Judiciary Committee addressed a letter to Alphabet‚ Google’s parent company‚ over the weekend. We obtained a copy of the letter for you here. The document stresses that the committee is insisting upon receiving any connection or correspondence detailing interaction between the American authorities and Alphabet concerning Gemini. All requested communication records must be submitted to them by March 17th. The committee’s chairperson‚ Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan‚ authored the letter stating their interest in how the AI model’s results were intentionally skewed‚ saying‚ “In light of new reporting regarding how Alphabet intentionally biased its AI model‚ Gemini‚ by giving it instructions that distort the results shared with Americans…we write to inform you that the committee views the subpoena as covering material relating to this technology.” Reports from inside the Gemini team have raised eyebrows‚ suggesting that the program adhered to the Biden administration’s guidelines emphasizing “equity.” This concept prioritizes promoting traditionally marginalized groups‚ even over accuracy or truth. This resulted in the AI system often presenting images that disproportionately represent diverse individuals‚ ignoring historical accuracy. Gemini’s portrayal of historical figures‚ for example‚ the Founding Fathers or revolutionary soldiers as black or other minorities and the refusal to portray them as white‚ was the subject of widespread ridicule that affected Google’s stock price. The letter goes on to convey fears circling potential violations of free speech. The committee observed Google’s history of censoring speech protected under the First Amendment as per government requests and demands. The post House Republicans Seek Documents From Google on Alleged Government Influence in Biased AI Program Gemini appeared first on Reclaim The Net.
Like
Comment
Share
Pet Life
Pet Life
1 y

Weekly Roundup: Funny Dog Posts From Last Week (Mar 04)
Favicon 
www.dogingtonpost.com

Weekly Roundup: Funny Dog Posts From Last Week (Mar 04)

We present you funny dog posts from Feb 25 to Mar 02 that will paws-itively make you through the rest of the week!
Like
Comment
Share
Survival Prepper
Survival Prepper  
1 y

The Real Problem with Julian Assange
Favicon 
preppersdailynews.com

The Real Problem with Julian Assange

The Real Problem with Julian Assange
Like
Comment
Share
Survival Prepper
Survival Prepper  
1 y

Alarm Bells For The U.S. Food Supply
Favicon 
preppersdailynews.com

Alarm Bells For The U.S. Food Supply

Alarm Bells For The U.S. Food Supply
Like
Comment
Share
Survival Prepper
Survival Prepper  
1 y

FBI ARRESTS BlazeTV Reporter Steve Baker who EXPOSED Jan 6 LIES
Favicon 
preppersdailynews.com

FBI ARRESTS BlazeTV Reporter Steve Baker who EXPOSED Jan 6 LIES

FBI ARRESTS BlazeTV Reporter Steve Baker who EXPOSED Jan 6 LIES
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 66838 out of 85598
  • 66834
  • 66835
  • 66836
  • 66837
  • 66838
  • 66839
  • 66840
  • 66841
  • 66842
  • 66843
  • 66844
  • 66845
  • 66846
  • 66847
  • 66848
  • 66849
  • 66850
  • 66851
  • 66852
  • 66853
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund