Newly launched GBrakes offers high-performance brake products for a wide range of motorcycle applications. Giocar America, distributor of Galfer Spain brake products, has announced a transition from the brand previously called Galfer USA to a new brand called GBrakes. GBrakes was officially launched Sept. 16, 2025, and it offers high-performance brake products through its new website or at dealerships through its U.S. distributors. Galfer was founded in Barcelona in 1952 by Maffio Milesi. In 1992, his son Giorgio carried the brand into the U.S. market. Now, Sandro Milsei is leading GBrakes as the third generation, working as CEO of the brand. Through the new GBrakes website, customers can find products like precision laser-cut rotors, high-performance pads, steel braided lines, and full brake kits for V-Twins, sportbikes, street motorcycles, dirtbikes, and dual-sports. GBrakes will also offer braking customization services. An online custom rotor configurator allows customers to explore V-Twin rotor configurations, and a dedicated line configurator is expected to be available soon. “We are excited to announce our strategic shift to focus solely on developing our own brand of braking systems,” said Sandro Milesi. “We’ve taken everything we’ve learned over the past seven decades from my father and grandfather and evolved it into something new with GBrakes — while still maintaining the same commitment to performance, same passion for supporting the rider communities, and of course, delivering the best customer service.” GBrakes products can be found on the GBrakes website, and they are distributed to dealers and custom shops through Parts Unlimited, Drag Specialties, and Western Power Sports. The post Galfer Launches New Brand, GBrakes, in U.S. appeared first on Rider Magazine.

While many riders still favor gas-powered motorcycles, the Reload Land Electric Motorcycle Festival celebrates the innovated leaps being taken in the realm of electric motorcycles. (Photos by the author) After participating in this year’s Moto Giro d’Italia – well known for its glorious array of petrol-powered classic motorcycles – I travelled to Berlin for a very different type of event: Reload Land – The Electric Motorcycle Festival, which was held June 7-8 at the Napoleon Komplex.  I lived in West Berlin back when the wall still cut through this part of the city, so this would be a homecoming of sorts, allowing me to revisit my old stomping grounds while immersing myself in the sights – and silence – of the electric motorcycle scene. Until now, this world had been mostly unfamiliar to me. While the switch from warm Italian sunshine to Berlin’s unseasonably chilly air and looming rainclouds wasn’t ideal, my excitement for the weekend didn’t waver. The Napoleon Komplex had been transformed with banners and manufacturer displays, unified under the event’s slogan: Fahre elektrisch – Tanze aus der Reihe, or “Drive electric – dance out of line.”  Test riding the LiveWire Del Mar. It was a fitting motto for a thoughtfully curated event brought to life by festival founder Maximilian Funk and his team. Their aim? To show that life on two wheels without engine noise can be just as thrilling as its petrol-powered counterpart.  To the right of the main entrance was a dedicated demo fleet area. To the left, a large Can-Am display stood alongside LiveWire’s offering, both adjacent to an outdoor bar and seating area. A modest stage was set up for the evening’s entertainment: electronic music, naturally. Notably absent was Zero Motorcycles – at least officially. The only appearance of a Zero came courtesy of German YouTuber Paddy Lectric, whose privately owned Zero DSR/X was parked nearby. Paddy also runs a website called “Stecker Biker” (Plug Biker).  Also making a charming appearance in the forecourt was Revive’s classic VW Bulli van and a Citroën 2CV coffee cart – both, of course, converted to electric.  Can-Am Pulse Inside the Electric Kingdom  Inside the darkened hall, spotlit stands created a moody, theatrical vibe. Photography was a challenge until the daylight improved later in the day. Near the entrance, in front of the main stage, stood a striking electric Porsche 911, converted by the firm Revive. Yours for a tidy $100,000 and change.  Sharing stage space were custom bikes from Crooked and Loose Screw. Crooked’s E-Type – built on an RGNT No. 1 Scrambler SE – merges the looks of their petrol-based customs with an electric powertrain, illustrating how the two worlds can coexist.  Crooked E-Type Nearby was a practical electric cargo bike from Fat Albert, seemingly designed with crate-of-beer transport in mind. Can-Am’s electric offerings, the Pulse and Origin, were not only displayed in the main hall but also available for test rides outside. RELATED: Major Price Drop on 2026 Can-Am Electric Motorcycles Maeving, a British manufacturer, showcased two bikes in their minimalist-retro style: one in cool white with racing stripes and another in a more understated gray. Test rides were on offer too.  Maeving showed two bikes and offered test rides. Black Tea Motorcycles, a Munich-based firm, displayed their signature model sans faux fuel tank to highlight the battery arrangement. Meanwhile, Metorbike from Hamburg leaned into nostalgic vibes, designing their frames around the 1970s Puch Magnum moped.  A Black Tea Motorcycles bike without the faux fuel tank. Enverotricity – quite the tongue-twister – offered an off-road platform that could be configured into five different versions depending on rider preference.  From India to Estonia  Emco scooters, from Lower Saxony, were also on display, including their sleek black Unu scooter. Their fleet-focused electric scooters have ranges of 50 to 130 km (31-81 miles) and top out at 45 km/h (28 mph).  Emco scooter A major international highlight was Ultraviolette, an Indian electric motorcycle brand that launched its F77 Mach 2 Recon and F77 Superstreet Recon models in Europe at the event. With aerospace-inspired engineering, the F77 boasts 40 hp, 74 lb-ft of torque, and a top speed of 155 km/h (96 mph). Acceleration is equally impressive: 0-60 km/h (37 mph) in 2.8 seconds and 0-100 km/h (62 mph) in 7.7. A five-year battery warranty and regenerative braking (up to 30% energy recovery) make this a very compelling option.  Ultraviolette’s F77 Mach 2 Recon For 2026, Ultraviolette plans to launch two more models: the Tesseract e-scooter and the Shockwave, a lightweight motorcycle promising the thrill of old-school 2-stroke bikes in futuristic form.  Verge Motorcycles, with roots in Estonia and an innovation hub in San Francisco, had jaws dropping with their TS Pro – delivering an earth-moving 738 lb-ft of torque and a top speed of 200 km/h (124 mph). Its massive rear tire is like that of Triumph’s Rocket 3 and Ducati’s XDiavel.  Verge Motorcycles TS Pro East German Classics and Swiss Speed  Czech designer Ladislav Jecminek presented the Havoc, a futuristic dual-purpose e-motorcycle capable of 43 hp and a range of around 130 km (81 miles).  A Simson converted to electric by Second Ride. Berlin-based Second Ride brought something special: converted Simson mopeds and scooters from East Germany. These 2-stroke classics, once the most produced two-wheelers in the country, have been reborn as low-maintenance, zero-emission machines. Over 800 conversion kits have already left their facility. I took a black version of the S51 for a spin around the block and was surprised by its pep.  The author rode this converted Simson. Coopop, a brand developed in South Korea and refined in Germany, had a tidy line-up of city-focused e-bikes, including bobber and scrambler styles with 11 hp, 120 km (75 miles) of range, and top speeds of 45 km/h (28 mph).  A Coopop e-bike. Bold Concepts & Silent Power  Around the corner, another space featured interviews with exhibitors and hosted the Reload Custom Electric Bike exhibit – dramatically lit and full of boundary-pushing design.  Danish startup Diem showed off its X-01, a striking concept featuring a single-beam frame, single-sided swingarm, Brembo brakes, Showa forks, and an axial flux hub motor rated at 47.5 hp.  Diem X-01 From Sweden came the Polestar Exö, a concept designed by industrial design graduate Joel Wengström. Inspired by biomimicry and featuring a bio-composite exoskeleton shaped like a scorpion’s tail, it was one of the show’s more avant-garde entries.  Switzerland’s Hush Cycles stunned attendees with their Superior GT – a 200-hp hubless electric motorcycle with a range of up to 400 km (249 miles), acceleration from 0-100 km/h (62 mph) in 2.5 seconds, and a whopping 50-liter trunk. Only 300 units will be built.  Hush Cycles Superior GT Electric Shock & Chopper Cool  Proving electric vehicles can still pack a punch, Volto – a yellow custom electric car based on a Volvo 850 – was transformed by JP Performance into a beast with 1,000 hp and selectable drive modes.  To close the loop between old school and new school, Sine Cycles presented the King Current – a chopper-style electric bike built around a 2016 Zero FX drivetrain. With exposed backbone, cantilever suspension, and 43 hp on tap, it made a statement without making a sound.  Sine Cycles’ chopper-styled King Current Riding the Silence  Later in the day, I suited up for a booked test ride on the LiveWire Del Mar. A group of four riders was led through Berlin’s streets. This was my first proper ride on an electric streetbike. At first, the silence was unnerving – until I opened the throttle on a clear stretch of road and felt the instant torque. I was hooked.  Traffic stops were slightly comical – a group of silent machines idling at red lights, no exhaust notes to be heard. Some of the roads we travelled had already seen rain, and with more on the way, I made a quick dash to the Can-Am area for another test ride.  First up was their Origin dual-sport bike. While the power delivery was great, I found the seat height a bit too tall for comfort. Halfway through the ride I swapped to the Pulse, and by then, the heavens had opened. We were soaked, but I found the lower-slung Pulse much more enjoyable. RELATED: 2025 Can-Am Pulse and Origin Video Review Can-Am Origin Both bikes feature a Rotax E-Power system that cleverly combines the battery, inverter, charger, and motor into a single liquid-cooled unit – helping manage heat even during fast charging. With 47 hp, 53 lb-ft of torque, and a sub-4-second 0-60 mph time on the Pulse, performance was more than adequate.  I returned drenched and opted to skip Sunday’s program due to worsening forecasts. I missed the launch of the Ichiban electric bike, which was prominently featured on the Reload poster, and also the Saturday Night Silent Ride, which reportedly drew over 100 electric bikes and scooters – a signature moment for the event.  A Simson converted to electric by Second Ride. Final Thoughts  As I rode the LiveWire Del Mar through Berlin, silently speeding along on an open stretch of road, I couldn’t help but wonder: What if a pedestrian stepped out, unaware of my presence due to the lack of sound? Fortunately, some brands are addressing this concern – Metorbike, for example, offers eight sound modules for its bikes.  Finally, it’s worth noting that Reload Land is expanding its footprint: The first Silent Ride Paris took place on June 28, 2025, cruising through the French capital’s iconic landmarks. Next up is Milan, Italy, on September 13, 2025. Spread the volt!  The post Reload Land Electric Motorcycle Festival: Dance Out of Line  appeared first on Rider Magazine.

Would Charlie Kirk have supported the Death Penalty for his assassin? His actual answer might surprise you! I’ve seen a ton of people online saying Charlie surely wouldn’t support that because he was a Christian. And while I appreciate the intent behind that sentiment, it’s not what Charlie would have said. How do I know? Because luckily we have a VAST database of him speaking on virtually any topic you can think of, and a big hat tip to my friend Pepe Deluxe for finding this clip. Watch Charlie answer that question himself — not just giving a simplistic “love everyone” message but weighing the balance between Grace and Justice in the Bible.  Too often we go 100% Grace or 100% Justice and each of those is dangerous.  Charlie brilliantly navigated both in this answer: WATCH: Charlie Kirk on the death penalty pic.twitter.com/RNrIQVW4xS — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) September 16, 2025 FULL TRANSCRIPT HERE IF READING IS BETTER FOR YOU: It’s like, yeah, we’re pro-choice, but then when it comes to like vaccinations and my body, my choice, suddenly they’re not so pro-choice anymore. I feel like conservatives do the same thing, but on the pro-life side. So can you ex—can you defend—I mean, come on man, you seem so much smarter than that. What do you think my answer is? I don’t—’Cause they did something bad? Well, yeah. But if life is—and, and, and—invaluable—well then why do you not consider it valuable throughout the whole lifespan, not just the beginning? Well, ’cause you believe in putting criminals in jail, right? Yes. Which is a taking of their rights. Not their life. Well, again, but their whole life is completely changed. So I guess it’s— Right. Also an insult to the victim, isn’t it, saying that your life doesn’t matter so much, that your murderer can keep on living but you yourself aren’t living? It’s— Well— Actually devalues the value of the victim— Mm-hmm. Or the victims, actually, in a lot of times. Mm-hmm. And you have a hat that says, “Make America Holy Again.” Yes. God repeated in all 5 books of the Torah, “You take a life, your life will be taken.” To the consistency argument, if there is a baby here, you know, in the womb, that baby has done nothing wrong, whereas a guy who went and shot up a school did a lot wrong. Mm-hmm. And so the only answer is to say, “We value human life so much that you don’t get to keep on living if you take a precious human life.” It’s actually an explicitly pro-life position because it’s honoring the dead and honoring the victim so much that it’s not just one to be discarded. That’s, oh, it’s not just a clump of cells. You see, to be against the death penalty is actually consistent for the left because they’re like, “Oh, you know, it’s just a bunch of clump of cells that got shot up at a school. It doesn’t really matter. Go put them in a jail.” Where we say, “No, that’s a life you took and you don’t get to, get to keep on having breath if you go take another precious human life.” Mm-hmm. Does that make sense? It makes sense. Share!

HOLY CRAP THIS IS GOOD! Kash Patel is all of us right now… We’re done trying to co-exist with these people. No, I am not advocating for violence, but I am saying trying to talk to these nutcases has proven to be a fool’s errand. They don’t want open and honest debate…. They don’t want to solve issues…. They just want soundbites and money and power.  That’s it. And I think we’re all done playing the game. We’re all done smiling and trying to follow decorum and letting them destroy us. No more. WE THE PEOPLE are taking back this country, peacefully and patriotically of course, but make no mistake we’re taking it back from the criminal politicians! Kash Patel was all of us today when he EXPLODED on Adam Schiff. I cannot possibly love this any more than I already do. Here is just one quote, but he was only getting started with this: “You are the biggest fraud to ever set foot in the United States Senate. You are a disgrace to this institution and an utter coward…. You are a political BUFFOON at best.” Watch here: WOW! Kash Patel just went NUCLEAR on Adam Schiff “I am combating the weaponization of intelligence by the likes of YOU!” We have constantly proven YOU to be a LIAR in Russiagate, J6… you are the BIGGEST FRAUD to ever sit in the U.S. Senate You are a DISGRACE to this… pic.twitter.com/3ObCEwLjuE — Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) September 16, 2025 Kash laid such a beatdown on Watermelon Head that Congress had to adjourn afterwards! Longer clip here: Shouting match… Kash v Watermelon Head. Who won? Kash Patel slams Adam Schiff for His Conveniently Timed Concern Over Epstein After Years of Inaction by Obama and Biden Administrations, While Applauding Trump for bringing New Charges “You are the biggest fraud to ever set foot… https://t.co/sqvmDYoaDV pic.twitter.com/uX7mCGBxQA — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) September 16, 2025 FULL TRANSCRIPT: You’ve seen most of the files. Who, if anyone, did Epstein traffic these young women to besides himself? And you said, “Himself.” There’s no credible information, none. If there were, I would bring the case yesterday, that he trafficked to other individuals. And Kennedy, the information we have, again, is limited. And Senator Kennedy said, “The answer is no one.” And you said, “For the information we have.” So, is it your testimony today that in all the Epstein files that Jeffrey Epstein trafficked no one to anyone but himself? Is that your testimony, Mr.— I never said Jeffrey Epstein didn’t traffic anyone else. Did he traffic any young woman to someone other than himself? That was Mr. Kennedy’s question, Senator Kennedy’s question. I said the information that three administrations have had access to have made determinations that there are no investigative leads that were credible to prosecute and investigate any others. I’m asking— Well, I’m stating we were working on— Well, I’m asking you whether your testimony today, that, that, I— Well, you just read it and I said it 10 minutes ago, so let the record reflect my testimony. I just wanna make sure there’s no misunderstanding because there are victims, like Virginia Giuffre, who have testified otherwise, who have said otherwise, and you’re telling the American people today that the Epstein list is a single name and it’s Jeffrey Epstein. That’s what we’re to believe? That’s not what I’m saying. That’s what you’re saying. And you can say whatever you want. Well, let me ask you this. When Todd Blanche went to interview Ghislaine Maxwell, she said, “But did I, like, think these guys were coming for that? I really don’t. If you met Epstein, there’s no way that this cast of characters, of which it’s extraordinary, and some are in your cabinet, who you value as your coworkers and you know would be with him if he was a creep or because they wanted sexual favors. A man wants sexual favors, he will find that. They didn’t have to come to Epstein for that.” And the next question Todd Blanche, the president’s former criminal defense lawyer, asked is not, “Who in the cabinet? Who are you referring to?” His question is, “So when’s the last time you think you were with Mr. Epstein when he got a massage?” So let me ask you, who are those cabinet members that Ghislaine Maxwell is referring to, that were part of this cast of characters associated with Mr. Epstein? Who are they? The Deputy Attorney General took the aggressive step that no one else did and interviewed Ms. Maxwell for two days— No, I’m asking you who are the cabinet members? And we released the entirety of that transcript. Who are the cabinet members? I do not have that transcript in front of me. You’re picking at piecemeal. The American public can read the entirety of that. And let me ask you one last question, because you clearly won’t tell us the cabinet members associated with Mr. Epstein. But let me ask you one last question, and that is, right after she gives this testimony in front of an FBI agent, among others, she’s transferred to a minimum security prison not suitable for a sex offender like herself. Who made that decision and why? The Bureau of Prisons. The Bureau of Prisons decided, on their own, without any consultation with Blanche or anyone else, that they were gonna suddenly, after this interview, completely unrelated to this interview, completely unrelated to anything she said, move her to a prison not suitable for a sex offender. You want the American people to believe that? Do you think they’re stupid? No. I think the American people believe the truth, that I’m not in the weeds on the everyday movements of inmates. Oh, you’re not in the weeds? The most, the most significant witness that the Epstein files cover up gets moved— What I am doing is protecting this country, providing historic reform, and combating the weaponization of intelligence by the likes of you. And we have countlessly proven you to be a liar in RussiaGate and in January 6th. And you call that being in the weeds? You are the biggest fraud to ever sit in the United States Senate. You are a disgrace to this institution and an utter coward. This speaks to high heaven. And I’m not surprised that you continue to lie from your perch and put on a show so you can go raise money for your charade. You are a political buffoon at best. Well, you can take an internet troll and make the FBI director or Mr. Chairman nothing more than an internet point of order. Take it to the bank that the FBI is protecting this country and the state and citizens of California. We have brought historic reform. But all you care about is a child sex predator that was prosecuted by a prior administration, and the Obama Justice Department and the Biden Justice Department did squat. And what did President Trump do? Bring new charges courageously. And what have we done? You said, “I’m the most transparent FBI director in history.” 33,000 pages of information to you. I challenge you to say anything credibly to the truth. Go ahead and run to the cameras where you wanna go now. Both of you be quiet.

It is official. The District Attorney handling the case in Utah against Charlie Kirk’s suspected assassin has made it clear in a press conference a short time ago. Not only did he file a litany of charges against Tyler Robinson related to the murder of Charlie Kirk, but it also included a count of first degree AGGRAVATED murder. And he does intend to seek death as punishment if Robinson is ultimately found guilty. The list of charges includes tampering with evidence and obstruction charges — but that “AGGRAVATED” descriptor on the murder charge is what will carry the most weight in a sentencing hearing. Coupled with the 7th count of a violent crime with children present… Utah’s laws would indeed warrant the death penalty in a guilty conviction. Here’s a breakdown of the 7 charges filled this morning by District Attorney Jeff Gray’s office, along with a clip from the press conference announcing he would be seeking the death penalty: BREAKING: Utah County District Attorney Jeff Gray announces he will be seeking the death penalty for Charlie Kirk’s killer. Tyler Robinson is being charged with the following: Count 1: Aggravated murder. Count 2: Felony discharge of a firearm. Count 3: Obstruction of justice… pic.twitter.com/ScHRVdj3x7 — Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) September 16, 2025 Here’s the full text from that post listing every count against Robinson: BREAKING: Utah County District Attorney Jeff Gray announces he will be seeking the death penalty for Charlie Kirk’s killer. Tyler Robinson is being charged with the following: Count 1: Aggravated murder. Count 2: Felony discharge of a firearm. Count 3: Obstruction of justice – moving a firearm. Count 4: Obstruction of justice – disposing of clothing. Count 5: Witness tampering – telling a roommate to delete text messages. Count 6: Witness tampering – directing a roommate to stay quiet. Count 7: Committing violent crime when children are present. The District Attorney detailed those accounts during the press conference, and although he appeared professional and formal… I couldn’t help but detect that the DA was nearly overcome with the sense of duty weighing on him to ensure justice is done in this case. Here is the full screen version of that clip for convenience, including Gray announcing the “notice of intent” he says he is filing to seek the death penalty: BREAKING: Utah County District Attorney Jeff Gray announces he will be seeking the death penalty for Charlie Kirk’s killer. Tyler Robinson is being charged with the following: Count 1: Aggravated murder. Count 2: Felony discharge of a firearm. Count 3: Obstruction of justice… pic.twitter.com/ScHRVdj3x7 — Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) September 16, 2025 Along with the charges and intent to level a capital punishment sentence if found guilty… The District Attorney’s Office specified he had decided to seek that punishment independently based on the realities of the situation, according to this report from Reuters: Utah prosecutors said on Tuesday they will seek the death penalty for the suspect in conservative activist Charlie Kirk’s assassination and revealed some of the evidence against him, including alleged text messages in which he appeared to confess to the crime. “I had enough of his hatred,” Tyler Robinson, 22, told his roommate and romantic partner when asked why he had committed the murder, according to transcripts of messages in court documents filed by prosecutors on Tuesday. He is accused of firing the single rifle shot from a rooftop sniper’s nest that pierced Kirk’s neck last Wednesday on the campus of Utah Valley University in Orem, about 40 miles (65 km) south of Salt Lake City. Utah County District Attorney Jeffrey Gray said at a press conference that his office had filed seven counts against Robinson on Tuesday, including aggravated murder, obstruction of justice for disposing of evidence and witness tampering for asking his roommate to delete texts implicating him. Gray said he had made the decision to seek the death penalty “independently, based solely on the available evidence and circumstances and nature of the crime.” Some politicians, including U.S. President Donald Trump, had called for the death penalty in the case. The suspect was scheduled to appear via video feed from jail later on Tuesday in Utah County Justice Court in Provo. DNA found on the trigger of what authorities believe was the murder weapon was linked to Robinson, prosecutors said. Prosecutors have added aggravating factors to the murder and firearm charges because Robinson is believed to have targeted Kirk based on political views and knew that children would witness the killing, Gray said. Under state law, only aggravated murder can carry the death penalty. Even the press conference by the DA’s Office was imbued with the same gravity that all of us have felt over the last few days. You can watch the entire press conference held earlier by the Utah County District Attorney’s Office here: Ironically, Charlie Kirk not only believed in the death penalty. He argued that those “aggravated” conditions that will now be used to seek death for his own killer under Utah law… shouldn’t be necessary to qualify for a death sentence. Charlie Kirk fielded a question from a debater not long ago regarding the government’s ability to “kill”, contrasted with his belief in the need for a smaller and limited government. In true Charlie Kirk fashion, he didn’t answer in emotional platitudes or with a false logic based on relative morality. He gave an answer based in PRINCIPLE, as was recently covered by Fox News: Late Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk advocated the death penalty on several occasions, arguing it should apply broadly in murder cases rather than only in the most extreme circumstances. Officials on Friday identified Tyler Robinson, 22, as the suspect in Kirk’s assassination on a Utah college campus. Utah Gov. Spencer Cox said the state intends to pursue the death penalty if the case goes to trial. President Donald Trump also voiced support, saying he hopes Robinson receives the death penalty if found guilty. Earlier this year, Kirk discussed his stance on capital punishment during an exchange with a student captured in a video posted to Turning Point USA’s YouTube channel. Kirk was asked about how he could support a “limited government” while also believing it should have the power to execute people. The student countered that the death penalty should be reserved for extreme instances, such as school shootings, mass murders and crimes against humanity, but not for what she described as “eye-for-an-eye nonsense.” “Why is it that if you kill 10 people, such a morally different thing than killing one person?” Kirk asked the student, arguing that even people who claim to oppose the death penalty occasionally make exceptions. “Death penalties should be public, should be quick. It should be televised,” Kirk said. As he was known to do, Charlie Kirk readily identified the moral relativism hidden within the question meant to trip him up. Here’s a clip of that interaction mentioned in the previous Fox News story: The Christian Church in American — and in other nations as well — has already undergone a transition over the last few years. As the world grows darker, and hearts grow colder, there has been a growing remnant of believers who have begun to recognize their own need to hold the line spiritually. That spiritual awakening has already started to translate to practical realities as many of us have “upped our game”, determined to actually be who we claim to be. Charlie Kirk has been at the tip of the spear for that movement for YEARS now. As Benjamin Franklin once put it: “What you would seem to be, be really.” With his death — a true martyrdom — many are describing witnessing a hyper-push from God in that same direction. But not only in our own devotion to God personally. There is a renewed call across the land for JUSTICE. Not the sort of justice that revolves around the degree of sensationalism that can be stirred up for political purposes. But the sort of justice that effects the purposes that the Bible makes clear will happen to a land and a people who turn away from the “social justice” that Charlie Kirk talked about in that clip… And turns instead to the TRUE justice that is predicated on objective right and wrong. We cannot have a revival, like the sort that so many of us believe is brewing on the heels of Charlie Kirk’s death, without a return to JUSTICE in our land. Thankfully, that is exactly what has appeared on the court docket in Utah. Let’s pray that justice does indeed prevail once again in our land where only a false “social” justice has supplanted it for so long. RELATED REPORT: Would Charlie Kirk Support The DEATH PENALTY For His Assassin? His Answer Might Surprise You — WATCH Here! Would Charlie Kirk have supported the Death Penalty for his assassin? His actual answer might surprise you! I've seen a ton of people online saying Charlie surely wouldn't support that because he was a Christian. And while I appreciate the intent behind that sentiment, it's not what Charlie would have said. How do I know? Because luckily we have a VAST database of him speaking on virtually any topic you can think of, and a big hat tip to my friend Pepe Deluxe for finding this clip. Watch Charlie answer that question himself -- not just giving a simplistic "love everyone" message but weighing the balance between Grace and Justice in the Bible.  Too often we go 100% Grace or 100% Justice and each of those is dangerous.  Charlie brilliantly navigated both in this answer: WATCH: Charlie Kirk on the death penalty pic.twitter.com/RNrIQVW4xS — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) September 16, 2025 FULL TRANSCRIPT HERE IF READING IS BETTER FOR YOU: It's like, yeah, we're pro-choice, but then when it comes to like vaccinations and my body, my choice, suddenly they're not so pro-choice anymore. I feel like conservatives do the same thing, but on the pro-life side. So can you ex—can you defend—I mean, come on man, you seem so much smarter than that. What do you think my answer is? I don't—'Cause they did something bad? Well, yeah. But if life is—and, and, and—invaluable—well then why do you not consider it valuable throughout the whole lifespan, not just the beginning? Well, 'cause you believe in putting criminals in jail, right? Yes. Which is a taking of their rights. Not their life. Well, again, but their whole life is completely changed. So I guess it's— Right. Also an insult to the victim, isn't it, saying that your life doesn't matter so much, that your murderer can keep on living but you yourself aren't living? It's— Well— Actually devalues the value of the victim— Mm-hmm. Or the victims, actually, in a lot of times. Mm-hmm. And you have a hat that says, "Make America Holy Again." Yes. God repeated in all 5 books of the Torah, "You take a life, your life will be taken." To the consistency argument, if there is a baby here, you know, in the womb, that baby has done nothing wrong, whereas a guy who went and shot up a school did a lot wrong. Mm-hmm. And so the only answer is to say, "We value human life so much that you don't get to keep on living if you take a precious human life." It's actually an explicitly pro-life position because it's honoring the dead and honoring the victim so much that it's not just one to be discarded. That's, oh, it's not just a clump of cells. You see, to be against the death penalty is actually consistent for the left because they're like, "Oh, you know, it's just a bunch of clump of cells that got shot up at a school. It doesn't really matter. Go put them in a jail." Where we say, "No, that's a life you took and you don't get to, get to keep on having breath if you go take another precious human life." Mm-hmm. Does that make sense? It makes sense. Share!

In a gigantic win for President Trump, Fulton County DA Fani Wilis has just been permanently disqualified from prosecuting her sham RICO case against him and his allies! The Georgia Supreme Court finally kicked her off the case today by denying her appeal, ruling — once and for all — that she and her office can no longer prosecute the bogus election interference case. President Trump made the huge announcement on Truth Social: BREAKING NEWS! In a Big WIN for Justice and Law in Georgia, the Georgia Supreme Court just ruled that District Attorney Fani Willis and her “team” of Weaponized Prosecutors are DISQUALIFIED, once and for all, from the Fake Witch Hunt against me, and many other Great American Patriots, people that were treated so unfairly, and indeed, viciously. Willis and her lover, Nathan Wade, who she hired even though he was completely unqualified and had never prosecuted such a case before, blatantly lied, under oath, about their torrid “love” affair, the ridiculous amounts of money she paid him, their Caribbean vacations together, her clear Campaign Finance violations, unlawfully taking money from the honest Taxpayers of Georgia, and, most importantly, about their obsession with doing anything and everything they can to “GET TRUMP,” which included destroying the lives of many other people. Just like the purely political, lawless, and dismissed Witch Hunts brought through the Biden White House by Deranged Jack Smith, and others, this Unconstitutional Georgia Hoax, together with the remaining Shams in New York, should now be dead for good. The Prosecutorial Weaponization of DONALD J. TRUMP had no limits. They went after their Political Opponent at levels never seen before, and LOST. They are now CRIMINALS who will hopefully pay serious consequences for their illegal actions. Our Country was dead a year ago, in large part because of the illegal Weaponization of the American Justice System by the Radical Left Democrats. As we end illegal Political Lawfare, the U.S.A. is BACK now, bigger and better than ever before. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! President DJT Jeff Clark, another target in Fani Willis’ witchhunt against President Trump and his allies, also announced: I’m pleased to announce that Fani Willis has now been permanently disqualified from prosecuting the indictment that she brought against President Trump, me, and many others. The Georgia Supreme Court denied cert to Fani Willis, who was attempting to get that Court to take her… pic.twitter.com/mrJxKjUbMS — Jeff Clark (@JeffClarkUS) September 16, 2025 I’m pleased to announce that Fani Willis has now been permanently disqualified from prosecuting the indictment that she brought against President Trump, me, and many others. The Georgia Supreme Court denied cert to Fani Willis, who was attempting to get that Court to take her case, so that she could try to get un-disqualified after the Georgia Court of Appeals threw her off the case. The case now moves to the Prosecuting Attorneys Council of Georgia. They will decide on a replacement for Willis. Praise the Lord for progress in this case. It never should have been brought in the first place. The Georgia Court of Appeals originally ruled in December to remove Fani Willis and her team from the case over her affair with special prosecutor Nathan Wade. However, she filed an appeal, which was just denied today. Fox News has more: The Georgia Court of Appeals in December ruled that Willis and her office could not continue to prosecute the case, citing an “appearance of impropriety” stemming from her romantic relationship with special prosecutor Nathan Wade. Willis appealed to the Georgia Supreme Court in January, but on Tuesday the high court declined in a 4-3 decision to take up the case. One judge didn’t participate and another was disqualified. Steve Sadow, Trump’s attorney in the Georgia case, welcomed the decision. “Willis’ misconduct during the investigation and prosecution of President Trump was egregious and she deserved nothing less than disqualification,” Sadow said in a statement. “This proper decision should bring an end to the wrongful political, lawfare persecutions of the president.” Jeff Clarke, a former Justice Department official who is one of 19 defendants indicted under the state’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, said the case now moves to the Prosecuting Attorneys’ Council of Georgia, which will choose a replacement. “Praise the Lord for progress in this case. It never should have been brought in the first place,” he said. Willis said she disagreed with the decision but would make the case file and evidence available to the Prosecuting Attorneys Council for use in the litigation. “While I disagree with the decision of the Georgia Court of Appeals and the Georgia Supreme Court’s divided decision not to review it, I respect the legal process and the courts,” Willis said, per Fox Atlanta. This is great news. However, the case hasn’t been completely thrown out — yet. Now, a new prosecutor will be appointed and they will decide on whether or not to drop it (as they should) or press forward. The New York Times noted: The 4-3 ruling means that the criminal case — once considered one of the most serious legal threats to Mr. Trump after he sought to overturn his 2020 election loss — will not move forward anytime soon, if ever. The Prosecuting Attorneys’ Council of Georgia, a state entity, will now decide whether to reassign the case, and to whom. The executive director of the council, Pete Skandalakis, is a Republican. A new prosecutor could decide to press on with the case — now against a sitting president — drop it or bring a modified version. If charges remain against Mr. Trump, he would most likely not face trial until after his term ends in 2029. But if a new prosecutor wanted to proceed with the case against some or all of the 14 other defendants, they could be tried sooner.

What’s going on with FBI Director Kash Patel? FBI Director Kash Patel shared that there is no “credible evidence” that Jeffrey Epstein trafficked women to other individuals. Patels’ comment came ater Republican Senator John Kennedy asked Patel if Epstein trafficked any young women. Newsweek covered Patel’s comments on Epstein more in-depth: FBI Director Kash Patel told U.S. senators on Tuesday morning that there is “no credible information” in case files that Jeffrey Epstein trafficked young women to anyone other than himself. The remarks came during a heated hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee, in which Republican Louisiana Senator John Kennedy asked Patel about his knowledge of the Epstein files. The committee’s questioning of Patel comes amid increased scrutiny of his leadership of the FBI and his handling of the investigation into the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk last week. Kennedy, alongside other senators, questioned Patel over the Epstein files on Tuesday morning. “You’ve seen most of the files. Who if anyone did Epstein traffic these young women to, besides himself?” Kennedy asked Patel. Patel responded, “Himself. There is no credible information, none. If there were I would bring the case yesterday that he trafficked to other individuals. And the information we have, again, is limited.” Kennedy followed up, “So the answer is no one?” The FBI director responded, “For the information that we have. In the case files.” Kennedy said such an explanation was unlikely to satisfy calls for greater transparency. “This issue is not going to go away,” Kennedy said. “The central question for the American people is this: They know Epstein trafficked young women for sex with himself. What they want to know is whether he trafficked them to anyone else.” Watch here: KENNEDY: “Who, if anyone, did Epstein traffic these young women to?” PATEL: “There is no credible information, none … that he trafficked to other individuals.” pic.twitter.com/KwE5mjENjy — Acyn (@Acyn) September 16, 2025 Here’s how users on X responded to Patel’s comments: Kash Patel says that the FBI concluded that Epstein never trafficked any woman to anyone pic.twitter.com/OyooETcClU — Kaguya’s Top Gal (@hayasaka_aryan) September 16, 2025 Kash Patel now claims Jeffrey Epstein didn’t traffic young girls to anyone Then why not release the files ? The cover-up continues pic.twitter.com/IzGregWS0N — The Tennessee Holler (@TheTNHoller) September 16, 2025 Here’s Patel before he was the director of the FBI: Q: Why is the FBI not releasing the Epstein list? FBI Director Kash Patel: “Because of who’s on that list.” pic.twitter.com/GxONB43NFi — The Intellectualist (@highbrow_nobrow) September 9, 2025 Watch the full hearing here:

Attorney General Pam Bondi is causing a huge controversy in the wake of the tragic assassination of Charlie Kirk. Appearing on The Katie Miller Podcast, Bondi implied that the Justice Department will target so-called “hate speech” having to do with Kirk’s murder. Watch what she had to say here for yourself: Attorney General Pam Bondi: “There’s free speech and then there’s hate speech, and there is no place, especially now, especially after what happened to Charlie, in our society…We will absolutely target you, go after you, if you are targeting anyone with hate speech.” pic.twitter.com/Bqj6TQOGwP — The Bulwark (@BulwarkOnline) September 16, 2025 Later, Pam Bondi doubled down on Fox News’s Hannity. While talking about a recent incident at a Michigan Office Depot, where employees refused to print posters for a Charlie Kirk prayer vigil, Bondi threatened to prosecute. Watch: Bondi: If you want to go and print posters with Charlie’s picture for a vigil, you have to let them do that. We can prosecute you for that. We have right now our civil rights unit looking at that. pic.twitter.com/GugF4PsGwZ — Acyn (@Acyn) September 16, 2025 Is it wrong for someone to refuse to print posters for a prayer vigil of a loving husband, father, and impactful leader who was just brutally murdered? Yes. It’s good that Office Depot fired the employees responsible for refusing to do so, since it is against their store policies and just flat-out morally reprehensible. But, is it prosecutable? No. For years, conservatives, under the First Amendment, have fought cases like these. I’m thinking of the gay cake situation, where, after a long struggle, the Supreme Court ultimately ruled that a Christian bakery had the right to refuse to make a cake that went against their beliefs. We can’t be hypocrites here. We can’t go against the Constitution. As you can imagine, Bondi is facing a ton of backlash on social media over her remarks. In fact, calls are growing for Bondi to be ousted — from both sides of the aisle. Matt Walsh is just one conservative voice calling for Bondi’s removal: Get rid of her. Today. This is insane. Conservatives have fought for decades for the right to refuse service to anyone. We won that fight. Now Pam Bondi wants to roll it all back for no reason. The employee who didn’t print the flyer was already fired by his employer. This stuff… https://t.co/Ry7PEUz1ca — Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) September 16, 2025 Get rid of her. Today. This is insane. Conservatives have fought for decades for the right to refuse service to anyone. We won that fight. Now Pam Bondi wants to roll it all back for no reason. The employee who didn’t print the flyer was already fired by his employer. This stuff is being handled successfully through free speech and free markets. This is totally gratuitous and pointless. We need the AG focused on bringing down the left wing terror cells, not prosecuting Office Depot for God’s sake. Between this “hate speech” nonsense and Epstein, Pam Bondi has committed two of the most egregious errors we’ve ever seen from an Attorney General. How many seismic fuck ups will Trump permit her before he cuts her loose? Is this a ten strikes and you’re out deal or what? — Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) September 16, 2025 Auron MacIntyre of The Blaze also called for Bondi to be fired: She’s either intentionally destroying the ability of the administration to go after the leftist terror network that killed Charlie Kirk or she it too stupid to be in any position that requires public speaking I don’t care which, just fire her https://t.co/7FZMPAjqbC — Auron MacIntyre (@AuronMacintyre) September 16, 2025 The Hodgetwins called her “WEAK”: Pam Bondi needs to be fired She is WEAK — Hodgetwins (@hodgetwins) September 16, 2025 Conservative activist Christopher Rufo expressed his disappointed with Bondi: This is extremely concerning. The distinction is not between “free speech” and “hate speech,” but between “free speech” and “organizing illicit activities, engaging in political violence, depriving others of their civil rights, and committing tax or nonprofit fraud.” https://t.co/inFNF3prAa — Christopher F. Rufo (@realchrisrufo) September 16, 2025 Dave Rubin also criticized Bondi, pointing out that Charlie Kirk himself would be against this: Unbelievably bad take by Bondi, worthy of immediate resignation of an Attorney General. Hate speech does not exist, you can say mean things about people. We have very specific limitations such as direct calls for violence, but amorphous “hate speech” does not exist. Charlie… — Dave Rubin (@RubinReport) September 16, 2025 Unbelievably bad take by Bondi, worthy of immediate resignation of an Attorney General. Hate speech does not exist, you can say mean things about people. We have very specific limitations such as direct calls for violence, but amorphous “hate speech” does not exist. Charlie would never want this… “There’s free speech and then there’s hate speech, and there is no place, especially now, especially after what happened to Charlie, in our society…We will absolutely target you, go after you, if you are targeting anyone with hate speech.” No Pam, we will do a basic civics lesson on the show today for you… https://x.com/BulwarkOnline/ Dave Rubin is right, by the way. Charlie Kirk lived by that age-old saying: I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it. That’s why the First Amendment exists, and Charlie lived and died protecting it. But don’t take it from me; take it from Charlie himself. Last year in May, Charlie Kirk posted this: Hate speech does not exist legally in America. There’s ugly speech. There’s gross speech. There’s evil speech. And ALL of it is protected by the First Amendment. Keep America free. — Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) May 3, 2024 Matt Van Swol noted: Charlie would have stood for none of what Pam has said here. The government should make no law infringing on freedom of speech to curtail “hate speech” in any way. None, zero. This is incredibly disappointing to hear. — Matt Van Swol (@matt_vanswol) September 16, 2025 After facing harsh criticism over her remarks, Pam Bondi released a statement to clarify what she meant by “hate speech.” To give her the benefit of the doubt, she says that she was referring to speech that “crosses the line into threats of violence” like we have been hearing from the left for years now and has now escalated after Charlie Kirk’s death. Exhibit A: EVIL: TikToker Calls for Murder of Charlie Kirk’s Wife & Kids, Politicians, & CEOs — “Why Did You Stop With Him?” Exhibit B: VILE: Popular Liberal Streamer Destiny Says Conservatives Should “Be Afraid of Getting Killed” Bondi cited 18 U.S.C. § 875(c), which says: (c) Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication containing any threat to kidnap any person or any threat to injure the person of another, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. Read Pam Bondi's full statement here for yourself and let me know what you think: Hate speech that crosses the line into threats of violence is NOT protected by the First Amendment. It’s a crime. For far too long, we’ve watched the radical left normalize threats, call for assassinations, and cheer on political violence. That era is over. Under 18 U.S.C. §… — Attorney General Pamela Bondi (@AGPamBondi) September 16, 2025 Hate speech that crosses the line into threats of violence is NOT protected by the First Amendment. It’s a crime. For far too long, we’ve watched the radical left normalize threats, call for assassinations, and cheer on political violence. That era is over. Under 18 U.S.C. § 875(c), it is a federal crime to transmit “any communication containing any threat to kidnap any person or any threat to injure the person of another.” Likewise, 18 U.S.C. § 876 and 18 U.S.C. § 115 make it a felony to threaten public officials, members of Congress, or their families. You cannot call for someone’s murder. You cannot swat a Member of Congress. You cannot dox a conservative family and think it will be brushed off as “free speech.” These acts are punishable crimes, and every single threat will be met with the full force of the law. Free speech protects ideas, debate, even dissent but it does NOT and will NEVER protect violence. It is clear this violent rhetoric is designed to silence others from voicing conservative ideals. We will never be silenced. Not for our families, not for our freedoms, and never for Charlie. His legacy will not be erased by fear or intimidation. While some accused Pam Bondi of doing damage control, others, like Megyn Kelly came to her defense: Hate speech is not prosecutable in America (which is good). Pam Bondi knows this. I am guessing, given the statements by Stephen Miller yesterday about targeting violent cells, she means those who actually plan violence,which would not be about the speech but the conspiracy. https://t.co/gYpr6GxtV8 — Megyn Kelly (@megynkelly) September 16, 2025 So did Laura Loomer: Pam Bondi @AGPamBondi has clarified her comments about “hate speech”. President Trump and his administration have always shown a commitment to free speech. I think we should be gracious and accept Pam Bondi’s clarification of her comments because it’s obvious to be she meant to… https://t.co/EFK9Jj5wLV — Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) September 16, 2025 Pam Bondi @AGPamBondi has clarified her comments about “hate speech”. President Trump and his administration have always shown a commitment to free speech. I think we should be gracious and accept Pam Bondi’s clarification of her comments because it’s obvious to be she meant to say “incitement”, not hate speech. Was it an unfortunate misuse of words? Yes, but I don’t think it was intentional or malicious. She was on a podcast with @KatieMiller when she made her comments and it was not scripted. Sometimes things are awkwardly said on podcasts. It happens. Let’s focus on nudging the Trump admin to do what we want as it relates to cracking down on political violence. As someone who has very publicly attacked the AG, I truly believe she simply misspoke. She has since clarified to reiterate a commitment to protecting free speech but a crackdown on incitement of violence. The time to act is now. Let’s focus on what we want to see. A crackdown on political violence and action from the IRS @SecScottBessent to strip these leftist groups of their 501c3 status so they can’t get a tax write off for promoting assassination culture. We need to be focused on the action we want. Let’s rally behind action. I'm curious: what do you make of this? Do you agree or disagree with Pam Bondi?

FBI Director Kash Patel is not ruling out multiple suspects in the investigation of the assassination of Charlie Kirk. While speaking before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Patel was asked by Sen. John Kennedy if the suspected killer of Kirk Tyler Robinson acted alone. In response, Patel shared that the FBI is still early in its investigation but did reveal that they are investigating numerous suspects. Fox News broke the story and provided the following details: FBI Director Kash Patel did not rule out the possibility of others being involved in Charlie Kirk’s assassination as suspect Tyler Robinson awaits formal charges. During a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., asked Patel if Kirk’s assassin acted alone. “As I’ve said since the beginning, senator, it is very much an ongoing investigation, and I can’t speak to the state charges. That’s for the state to address on their own. But we are providing them with the same investigatory findings regarding the Department. And as I noted to Senator, I believe it was, Cornyn or Hawley, that there are a number of individuals that are currently being investigated and interrogated and a number yet to be investigated and interrogated, specific to that [Discord] chat room,” Patel said. “So we are very much in our ongoing posture of investigation,” Patel added. “So others could have been involved?” Kennedy asked him. “Yes sir,” Patel replied. Patel said earlier during the hearing that his agency is investigating “anyone and everyone involved” in a Discord chat with Robinson. Watch Patel here: SEN. JOHN KENNEDY: “So, others could have been involved” in the murder of Charlie Kirk? KASH PATEL: “Yes, sir.” pic.twitter.com/hwI81aWorA — Vigilant Fox (@VigilantFox) September 16, 2025 Here’s a longer clip: Senator Kennedy asks Dir. Patel about the Charlie Kirk ASSASSINATION & Epstein Files. Says there is no information he trafficked to anyone other than himself. Senator Kennedy ” DID MR. KIRK’S ASSASSIN ACT ALONE?”Kash Patel: It is very much an on going investigation.… pic.twitter.com/j4KPVds1QN — Johnny St.Pete (@JohnMcCloy) September 16, 2025 The Hill reported the Feds have seized Robinson’s devices and are currently investigating who he was in contact with before and after he allegedly assassinated Charlie Kirk: FBI Director Kash Patel said “multiple” electronic devices were seized from the Utah home of Tyler Robinson, the man accused of fatally shooting Charlie Kirk last week, as part of the ongoing investigation. “We are going to be interviewing scores of people, not just these chats on Discord, but any communications this individual have,” Patel said Monday evening during an appearance on Fox News’s “Hannity.” “We’ve seized multiple electronic devices from the home of the suspect and his romantic partner,” he continued. “We’ve got computers, we’ve got laptops, gaming systems, cell phones.” Law enforcement identified 22-year-old Robinson as the shooter who allegedly shot and killed Kirk, a conservative activist and co-founder of Turning Point USA, on Wednesday during an event at Utah Valley University. “The evidence and information will come out. I won’t stylize the evidence, but I will say what was found in terms of information was a text message exchange where he, the suspect, specifically stated that he had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and he was going to do that,” the FBI director told host Sean Hannity.