If you’re one of the twelve people in this country who still believes anything you see on cable news — if you’re the kind of person who, say, watches Chuck Schumer’s press conferences on Capitol Hill without being paid to do it — then there’s a chance you’re actually enthusiastic about the candidacy of Kamala Harris. You’ve been told that her campaign is off to a great start, and why would you possibly doubt it? In a matter of days, she’s transformed into a better candidate than anyone expected. She’s so inspirational, in fact, that the Obamas endorsed her in an awkward phone call, several days after everyone else in the party endorsed her. What’s missing in all of this manufactured enthusiasm is any explanation for why the party coalesced around Harris, or why she’s supposedly a better candidate now than she was four years ago. She hasn’t had a single clever moment, a great speech, or an innovative policy idea. To the extent she’s said anything about policy, it’s to undo everything she said back in 2020. She has no substance or even style. At least Obama was skilled enough with flowery rhetoric that the media could pretend he was profound and inspirational. But what is Kamala’s skill? What positive characteristic are they inflating or overstating to turn her into this political sensation? There isn’t one. The “transformation” is happening entirely and solely in the media. Kamala is the same Kamala she’s always been. What we’re witnessing is the media figuring out a new branding strategy in real time. Four years ago, Democrats experienced a similar political crisis. To stop Bernie Sanders, they had to rally around Joe Biden — a perennial failure in politics who no one, including his old boss Obama, took seriously. To help sell Biden to voters who had rejected him several times before, Democrats resorted to a strategy that’s now very familiar: they manufactured racial conflict. They told black voters that the other side wanted to hunt them down and kill them. They turned lifelong criminals like George Floyd and Jacob Blake into heroes. And they told white voters that, unless they’re bigots, they should be good allies and vote for Democrats.  The strategy worked. The fabricated media narratives and race hoaxes contributed to a kind of mass formation psychosis, to borrow a term from Robert Malone. Tens of millions of Americans were convinced by the lie that police officers regularly murder black people. They tolerated looting and violence in major cities in the name of racial retribution. And ultimately, more than a decade after Obama promised to usher in a racial utopia, we became a far more race-obsessed and racially conflicted society than we were at the turn of the century. It’s precisely because this strategy worked that Democrats are now trying it again. WATCH: The Matt Walsh Show For the second time in as many election cycles, Democrats are running a candidate who can barely complete coherent sentences, much less articulate a single achievement from their time in office. They know that “race hate” is once again their best option. Only this time, they’re being even more explicit about their intention of dividing Americans on the basis of race. We are now in the midst of a full-on “white guilt election.” Democrats are doing everything they can to mobilize voters by playing on white guilt. They’ve decided that, solely by virtue of their skin color and the mortal sins of their ancestors, white people have an obligation to support Kamala Harris. And while they’re supporting Harris, for good measure, white people need to stay the hell away from black people. In fact, white people aren’t even supposed to join the same virtual calls as black people. That’s how unclean white people are, according to the modern Democrat Party. To that end, just hours Joe Biden ended his campaign for a second term, Democrats began holding racially segregated political events using Zoom. First there was an event for black women supporters, which more than 40,000 black women joined. Whites weren’t welcome, apparently. Then there was an event for black men, black queer men, and Asian women. Again, whites weren’t welcome. They went through all the identity groups and sub-genres. I don’t know if they had a Zoom event for gay Aboriginals or plus-sized disabled furries, but they’ll get around to it if they haven’t. Finally on Thursday, there was a Zoom call for people identifying as white women, which was joined by more than 200,000 participants — a number so high that the Zoom call crashed several times. And you can understand why there was so much interest. It was history in the making: This Zoom call marked the first major opportunity for white people to get together in a whites-only political meeting since the KKK was shut down. And the white women certainly made the most of it. Of course, at their whites-only meeting, they made sure to say that conservatives are racist. That’s one of the things you do at whites-only meetings, naturally. You call people racist for refusing to hold segregated events. That goes without saying. But then things got weird, to use the term that Democrats now repeat at every opportunity. A woman named Arielle Fodor began speaking — or sort of half-singing, or whatever the hell she was doing — and her contribution to the struggle session was so on the nose, it verged on self-parody. Watch: Arielle Fodor, a.k.a. “Ms. Frazzled” — not to be confused with Ms Frizzle, of Magic School Bus fame — says “BIPOC women have tapped us in, as white women.” So apparently all women who identify as “black, indigenous and people of color” — every single one of them — have collectively decided, with no dissent, to “tap” women like Arielle Fodor in, to help achieve their political goals. I have my doubts about whether that happened. But if it did, that ranks up there as one of the worst decisions that the BIPOC collective has ever made, at least since they started referring to themselves as BIPOC. As it stands, the message Democrats are sending via Arielle Fodor is clear: white people are not allowed to correct black people. Ever. “God forbid” you do that, says Arielle Fodor. You see, black people are never wrong. And if you think black people can make mistakes, then you need to update your “algorithm,” says Arielle Fodor. She actually said that. In other words, you need to make sure your programming aligns with the latest software update from the DNC. So if a black person says that 3 x 7 = 57, just nod your head and smile. If a black person claims that elephants are reptiles, do not correct them. Remember that you are the one who is wrong, automatically. If a black person shoots you in the chest and steals your wallet, do not dare breathe a word of protest, you bigot. You thank that BIPOC American for his feedback and die without complaint, like an ally. I looked into this woman to make sure she’s a real person. I thought for sure that she had to be a conservative plant who infiltrated the white women meeting to make Democrats look bad. But it turns out she has a huge TikTok account. She’s apparently a “teacher” who makes videos about political topics — except she addresses her audience as if they’re kindergartners. Here’s one of them: The reason the schtick doesn’t work is that she’s clearly the dumb one, not the conservatives she’s attempting to mock. The only reason she’s pretending to address a mute, off-screen kindergartner is that it’s the only way she can potentially win an argument about anything. And even then she still loses. She’s arguing with invisible 5-year-olds, and you can’t help but be one the 5-year-old’s side — even if they don’t exist. To be clear, I’m not cherry-picking one insane speaker from the white women Zoom call. They were all varying degrees of crazy. Here for example was actress Connie Britton. She begins on message, by saying all white women are “privileged.” But then she starts talking about all the great things white women have done, before spiraling into a discussion about her own “life experiences” and then concluding that women need to “break free” by “literally” blowing up American culture. It’s not really clear what she’s talking about, but you can judge for yourself. Watch: We’re supposed to watch footage like this and conclude that conservatives are the “weird” ones. We’re supposed to watch this unhinged whites-only call and conclude that Republicans are the party of bigotry. And I guess we’re supposed to wait in suspense to see what Connie Britton decides to blow up. Not to be outdone, the pop singer Pink joined the call. And just a couple of weeks after the attempted assassination of Donald Trump, her contribution was to declare that Donald Trump is not a human being. Watch: Nobody knows what she’s talking about. Nobody knows why she’s dressed like she just got signed by Cash Money Records in 1998. There are many mysteries here. Now, in response to videos like this, it’s tempting to say, “well, these are just wealthy, demented celebrities who aren’t remotely representative of the rest of the electorate.” But that’s not true. Again, there are hundreds of thousands of people on these calls. And there are other indications that these events reflect much broader and more fundamental changes in the electorate, all over the world. Back in January, the Financial Times published this chart: FT graphic: John Burn-Murdoch. Copyright Financial Times. The data, which is pulled from Gallup, shows that men and women were split pretty much equally for decades along the liberal-conservative divide. But over a period of just six years, a massive gap has opened up. Women between the ages of 18 to 30 are now “30 percentage points more liberal than their male contemporaries,” the Financial Times found. There are similar gaps in Germany, the UK, and South Korea. More recently, this week, the Wall Street Journal found that there are massive gaps between men and women on several fundamental cultural issues. Courtesy: Stephanie Stamm/WSJ For example, young men oppose allowing children to “choose their gender identity without parental approval,” by a margin of 33 percentage points. That margin should be much higher, of course, because the idea of “gender identity” is made-up, and parents should be able to tell their children that. But the numbers for women are even worse. In fact, women actually support allowing children to pick their “gender identity” without parental approval, by a margin of 2 points. Meanwhile, the University of Michigan found that 12th grade girls are now far more likely to identify as liberal than they’ve been at any point since 1975. Courtesy: University of Michigan. Monitoring the Future Survey. These are seismic shifts. And they suggest that what we’re seeing on this Zoom call is now more common among American women than it’s ever been. Women — particularly single women — are now the backbone of the Democrat Party. Married women and both single and married men tend to vote conservative. Single women are the outlier. They’re the ones tuning into these Zoom calls and nodding their heads as Pink says, “Donald Trump isn’t human.” As significant as this problem may be for Republicans, of course the problem isn’t confined to women. Pretty much anyone with low testosterone appears to be affected.  If you thought the estrogen was out of control in the whites-only women’s event for Kamala, wait until you see what happened at the whites-only men’s event for Kamala last night. Somehow, there was even more talk of crying and feelings than there was at the women’s event. Here’s the actor Josh Gad for example: "On Election Night 2016, I wept. We had a chance to have a female president." White Dudes For Harris meeting ? pic.twitter.com/ruNLshd5cr — End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) July 30, 2024   So eight years ago, Josh Gad cried on election night because Hillary Clinton didn’t win. There are some mean people who saying that Josh Gad hadn’t cried that much since his local Krispy Kreme shut down. I’m not a mean person, so I’m not saying that. But mean people are, and I absolutely abhor such insensitive comments. Anyway, instead of doing everything he can to scrub this memory from his mind, and pretending it never happened, he’s openly admitting it — on a racially segregated Zoom call with hundreds of thousands of white people, no less. Oh and also, he thinks Democrats are better than Republicans because they have more celebrities on their side that he likes.  One of those celebrities is the guy who played one of the hobbits in “The Lord of the Rings,” Sean Astin. And he actually stumbled on an interesting observation, as he was overcome with some sort of emotion. Watch: “The idea that men can gather to talk about how we feel” The Lord of the Rings actor Sean Astin supports “white dudes for Kamala Harris” because he wants men to talk to other men about their feelings. pic.twitter.com/c27gRMuRuV — TENET Media (@watchTENETnow) July 30, 2024 “The idea that men can gather to talk about how we feel is an interesting, powerful concept.” This is an observation that might explain a lot, actually, although Sean Astin didn’t realize it. For a lot of people in this country, the idea of white men communicating about issues that affect them is simply unheard of. You might as well talk about communicating with aliens. Every other demographic group gets to communicate about its alleged problems. But if white men do that, they’re demonized.  That brings me back to one major factor that Democrats do have working in their favor this election: They’re making an explicit and direct pitch for the white vote. Yes, they’re doing it in a twisted, insane way. But they are doing it. Republicans on the other hand are terrified to even acknowledge the existence of white people — especially white men. They will make a direct appeal for the black vote, Hispanic vote, female vote, but never for the white vote. Which means that this white guilt strategy isn’t countered. Republicans will make fun of it (rightly so) but they won’t counter it. They won’t say, “No, white people shouldn’t feel guilty — they should be proud of who they are.” They’ll never say that in a million years. They want to have a “big tent” but they will not explicitly invite white men into it. Instead they simply take their support for granted and do nothing to mobilize it — a mistake that Democrats never make with their core constituency. There’s an opening here because again and again, Democrats attack white men. They also attack the very idea of masculinity. This is from the very beginning of yesterday’s Zoom call. Watch: White Dudes For Kamala Harris meeting starts off by attacking masculinity: pic.twitter.com/GA5PcJ39cw — End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) July 30, 2024 This is apparently the message that Democrats are running with. It’s a “myth” to say that “men are expected to be protectors and providers.” Now, the second part of the guy’s statement is true — the economy under Joe Biden makes it much harder for men to provide for their families. But that doesn’t make the role of men a “myth.” It means we should be doing everything we can to fix the economy and encourage more men to create families that they can provide for.  But instead of saying that, Pete Buttigieg — the paragon of masculinity — hopped on the Zoom call and said abortion is great because it gives men more “freedom.” This is why Mayor Pete supports abortion up until the moment of birth. This is one of those things Democrats are never supposed to say out loud, even though they all think it. Abortion frees men to have sex with random women, because if a baby is created in the process, they can always have it killed and disposed of. That’s what’s being said here. It’s not really about women at all, for Mayor Pete. It’s about empowering more men to abandon women and their potential future family to have more meaningless sex. Watch: Pete Buttigieg tells #WhiteDudesForKamala that “of course, men are also more free in a country where we have a president who stands up for things like access to abortion” pic.twitter.com/CEiAQf9TNa — Matt Wolking (@MattWolking) July 30, 2024 So Democrats’ message to white people on this call is clear: You’re racist, you need to shut up, and if possible, you should kill your child so you don’t have a family. That’s what they want white men to aspire to, instead of masculinity.  This racial guilt trip strategy is one that either works extremely well, or it falls laughably flat. There’s not a lot of room in between those extremes. For those white people who have been successfully indoctrinated into the cult of “anti-racism” — who’ve had their minds twisted nearly from birth by the idea that they are responsible for every atrocity in human history simply because of their skin pigment — this strategy is deeply effective. For those of us who were not successfully brainwashed, the whole thing is absurd. Often grotesque. Always laughable.  Right now, it’s clear that the Harris campaign is wagering that there are enough white people in the former category to push them over the top. They’re not being subtle about it. After jettisoning Joe Biden, Democrats have decided that they’re once again going all-in on anti-white race hatred. They’re betting that conservatives won’t even attempt to counter it.  But it wouldn’t be hard to do so. Imagine if Trump came out and just said this: “White men have been demonized and scapegoated for too long. They helped build this country. They deserve respect.” That would be a start. Millions and millions of white men would hear themselves actually defended by name — the same way every other group is — for the first time on the national political stage. That’s how you respond to the strategy that Democrats are now fully committed to. It’s how you return masculinity and sanity to this country. And it’s how you ensure that, in a little over three months, all of these celebrities are crying like it’s 2016 all over again.

The much-talked-about “White Dudes for Harris” Zoom call on Monday night boasted a few well-known names who talked about their support for Vice President Kamala Harris, but star Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow was not one of them despite a popular pro-Harris X account claiming he was. The X account, Kamala’s Wins — which has over 550,000 followers — wrote on Tuesday, “BREAKING: Joe Burrow is supporting Vice President Kamala Harris and even joined the White Dudes for Kamala call.” A spokesman for the Bengals, however, told the Cincinnati Enquirer on Tuesday that Burrow was not on the “White Dudes for Harris” call, and Kamala’s Wins later deleted its post. Another viral tweet claimed that New York Giants quarterback Daniel Jones and Detroit Lions quarterback Jared Goff also joined the Zoom session, but Front Office Sports reported that sources close to Jones and Goff said neither quarterback was on the pro-Harris call. Big names who did appear on the “White Dudes for Harris” call included actors Mark Hamill and Jeff Bridges, singer Josh Groban, Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg, and Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), among others. The group’s organizers said that they raised over $4 million for the Harris campaign during the Zoom session. During the call, speakers discussed their enthusiasm to support Harris while blasting former President Donald Trump. WATCH BEN SHAPIRO’S ‘SCAMALA: KAMALA HARRIS UNMASKED’ ON DAILYWIRE+ Burrow, who has stayed away from commenting on politics during his four-year NFL career, has not weighed in on the 2024 race. Earlier this year, the Bengals quarterback was seen chatting with Trump, along with San Francisco 49ers star defensive lineman Nick Bosa, at a UFC match, and Burrow also met the former president when his LSU Tigers visited the White House after winning the national championship in 2020. President Trump converses with Joe Burrow and Nick Bosa at UFC 299 in Miami, then posed for a photo with them. Think the left will have a meltdown? Apparently they already did! I think it’s a great video! pic.twitter.com/Es10CdNu3v — ??? ???????™️ (@CL4WS_OUT) March 13, 2024

British broadcaster Piers Morgan congratulated gymnast Simone Biles after the U.S. women earned gold in the team competition at the Paris Olympics on Tuesday — and he even took the time to admit he’d been wrong to criticize her after she dropped out of the 2021 Tokyo Olympics. “Congrats @simonebiles on becoming the most decorated American gymnast of all time. I was too harsh on you in 2021 when you quit the team finals,” Morgan said in a post to X, also sharing a photo of himself with Biles. “You’re a great champion, and have since proved me wrong in the best possible way — by letting your supreme talent do the talking.” Congrats @Simone_Biles on becoming the most decorated American gymnast of all time. I was too harsh on you in 2021 when you quit the team finals. You’re a great champion, and have since proved me wrong in the best possible way – by letting your supreme talent do the talking. ? pic.twitter.com/Zw5wWzQ4WH — Piers Morgan (@piersmorgan) July 30, 2024 Biles dropped from competition during the Tokyo Olympics, saying at the time that she needed to step back and focus on her mental health after getting “the twisties” — a dangerous condition in which gymnasts are unable to tell where they are while flipping and twisting through the air. “It’s so dangerous,” Biles explained during an interview later that year. “It’s basically life or death. It’s a miracle I landed on my feet. If that was any other person, they would have gone out on a stretcher. As soon as I landed that vault, I went and told my coach: ‘I cannot continue.'” Morgan criticized Biles’ abrupt exit from the competition, saying in a Daily Mail op-ed that she had let down her teammates and her country. He was equally harsh on X, saying, “Are ‘mental health issues’ now the go-to excuse for any poor performance in elite sport? What a joke.” Biles, now the most decorated American gymnast in history, will compete later this week for the all-around title.

Team USA Women’s Rugby Sevens team finally scored its first-ever Olympic medal on Tuesday when they took home a bronze in an unbelievable finish. During the 2024 Summer Olympics in Paris, the U.S. faced off against Australia in a heated game that literally came down to the final 90 seconds of the game, with USA coming away the victor, NBC News reported. In clips that have surfaced on X, USA had fallen to 7-12 behind Australia, when the Aussie’s Maddison Levi went for the conversion and missed. Team USA’s Ariana Ramsey got the ball and threw it to teammate Alex Sedrick, who caught the ball and went on to fight off not one but three Team Australia defenders. A FINISH YOU HAVE TO SEE TO BELIEVE! ? ALEX SEDRICK LEADS TEAM USA TO THE FIRST-EVER OLYMPIC RUGBY SEVENS MEDAL FOR THE UNITED STATES ON THE FINAL PLAY OF THE GAME! ? #ParisOlympics pic.twitter.com/1FMu9SWxDo — NBC Olympics & Paralympics (@NBCOlympics) July 30, 2024 It was then off to the races as Sedrick ran the entire length of the rugby pitch with no one even close to catching her.  In the final seconds, she dove over the line and slid down under the posts to score as her team went wild, bringing the score to 12-12. It was then up to Sedrick — who isn’t the normal kicker for the team — to make the final kick that went right through the uprights to give USA a 14-12 victory, the outlet noted. Members of Team USA then gather on the field to hug and celebrate as the crowd goes wild with their historic win. “One minute for the rest of her life, that’s a life changing moment for all of us and for rugby in America,” said overjoyed prop Kristi Kirshe, a native of Franklin, Massachusetts. “And thank God, (Sedrick) took off the way she did.” Team USA continues making history at the 2024 Olympics. On Sunday, American swimmer Nic Fink broke a 120-year-old Olympic record when he tied British champion Adam Peaty for the silver medal in the men’s 100-meter breaststroke: he competed — and medaled — in the Olympic Games at the age of 31 while also holding down a day job. On Monday, American pommel horse specialist Stephen Nedoroscik delivered a great routine to give the US a bronze medal in the team event, marking the first team medal for the U.S. men’s team since 2008, as previously reported. Virginia Kruta contributed to this piece. Related: American Swimmer Breaks 120-Year-Old Olympic Record, Medals At 31 While Holding Full-Time Job

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) confirmed late on Tuesday night that a targeted strike it launched earlier in the day in Lebanon killed Hezbollah’s top military commander. Israeli Air Force fighter jets conducted the strike on Fuad Shukr in Beirut after the Iranian-backed terrorist group murdered 12 children in northern Israel over the weekend in a rocket attack. The IDF said that Shukr was Hezbollah’s “most senior military commander and the head of its Strategic Unit” and Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah’s “right-hand man” and was his “adviser for planning and directing wartime operations.” Shukr was responsible for directing all of Hezbollah’s attacks on Israel since Hamas’ unprecedented October 7 terrorist attack in which thousands of terrorists stormed into Israel from Gaza and murdered 1,200 people, wounded more than 5,000, and took hundreds of people hostage. “As the Head of Hezbollah’s Strategic Unit, Fuad was responsible for the majority of Hezbollah’s most advanced weaponry, including precise-guided missiles, cruise missiles, anti-ship missiles, long-range rockets, and UAVs,” the statement said. “He was responsible for force build-up, planning, and execution of terror attacks against the State of Israel.” Fuad has been with Hezbollah for nearly 40 years and played a key roles in a number of major attacks since the early 1990s. CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP “In the 1990s, Fuad advanced numerous attacks against the IDF and the South Lebanon Army,” the statement said. “In 2000, he was directly involved in the abduction of the bodies of three IDF soldiers – SSGT Benyamin Avraham, SSGT Adi Avitan, and SSGT Omar Sawaid -who were killed by Hezbollah terrorists while patrolling the security fence adjacent to Har Dov. Since then, he has planned and directed numerous terror attacks against innocent civilians.” The U.S. government had placed a $5 million bounty on Shukr for playing a “central role in the October 23, 1983 bombing of the U.S. Marine Corps Barracks in Beirut which killed 241 U.S. military personnel and wounded 128 others,” according to the U.S. State Department.

The Kamala Harris campaign is focusing like a laser beam on single women. That is the absolute definition of her campaign. She’s going to try to run up the gender gap to the highest levels ever seen in the history of American politics, not on the back of married women, but on the back of single ladies. There’s a fascinating piece from the American Enterprise Institute circa 2023 by Samuel J. Abrams, who is a professor of politics at Sarah Lawrence College, and Joel Kotkin, the executive director of the Urban Reform Institute. Here’s what they say in terms of American politics:  Unmarried women without children have been moving toward the Democratic Party for several years, but the 2022 midterms may have been their electoral coming-out party as they proved the chief break on the predicted Republican wave. While married men and women as well as unmarried men broke for the GOP, CNN exit polls found that 68% of unmarried women voted for Democrats.  That is, in fact, its own voter bloc. Those are percentages equivalent in their magnitude to what you would perceive as a giant, self-interested voter bloc: single ladies.  The number of unmarried women in American society has dramatically increased over the course of the past several decades. The number of never-married women grew from about 20% in 1950 to over 30% in 2022, and the percentage of married women has declined from almost 70% in 1950 to under 50% today.  Single ladies have decided that they are their own voter bloc. Pew recently found, “Men are far more likely than women to be on the dating market: 61% of single men say they are currently looking for a relationship or dates, compared with 38% of single women.” And while married men and married women are far more likely than unmarried females to think that women are well-treated or equally treated, it turns out that younger, discontented single women are developing something of a group consciousness, according to Abrams and Kotkin. They state, “Nearly two-thirds of women under 30 see what happens to other women as critical to their own lives. Among women over 50, this mindset shrinks to less than half.” In other words, if you are an older, married woman, you tend to see yourself in the context of your family. And if you’re an unmarried, young single woman, you tend to see a certain level of female solidarity, which makes some sense because when you are a single, somewhat-atomized individual of any sort, you tend to try to find a community of like-minded people. WATCH: The Ben Shapiro Show As that ideology and constituency grows, it tends to form its own voter bloc. As AEI writes, “The key driver of these attitudes may be universities, where feminist ideology often holds powerful sway. Women now predominate on college campuses. In the late 1960s they were about 39% of college graduates; now they are about 59%. The percentage of full-time female professors has risen dramatically; at the full professor level the percentage has grown by roughly one-third.” Abrams and Kotkin cite the National Center for Education Statistics’ research, explaining that “the number of Women and Gender Studies degrees in the United States has increased by more than 300% since 1990.” “Married people account for 77% of all homeowners,” they continue. “Married women tend also to do far better professionally and economically.” Meanwhile, in terms of the rate of marriage, “those without spouses have declined by 15% over the past four decades.” And single-parent households do far worse than that.  It turns out that, economically speaking, married women tend to do better than single women. So what you have here is a disaffected constituency which the Democratic Party is honing in on like a laser beam. The campaign is trying to find white men who are going to pay homage to Kamala Harris as a woman to make all the single ladies feel really good. And then they’re trying to find white women who are willing to pay homage to Harris as a black woman. This is full intersectionality on display in the Harris campaign. If you like what you’re seeing in the campaign, get ready for that in the presidency. Intersectionality is the theory that everyone is describable by their group characteristics, and we can then rank how we ought to treat people based on their level of victimization, based on those group characteristics. For example, they will argue white women are more victimized than white men. Black women are more victimized than white women. That means that a white woman can’t speak to a black woman and a white man can’t speak to a white woman. If you like that in the campaign, get ready for that in the presidency because this is absolutely what the Harris candidacy stands for. On Monday night, the Harris campaign met with a group called White Dudes for Kamala. Roughly 30,000 men showed up on this Zoom call. This was not a group of people who were just supportive of Harris. It was a struggle session in which white dudes declared themselves subservient to both women and also to black women because this is the essence of intersectionality. Every speaker was an upper-class, college-educated or extraordinarily wealthy Hollywood liberal who talked about how, because of their privilege, they had to demonstrate to the world that Harris was the candidate for them — not because she is well-qualified, not because she is amazing at her job, and not because they agree with her policies, but because it is just so important based on intersectional characteristics to support Kamala Harris. They were simping for Kamala. What was this White Dudes for Kamala about? It was certainly not about reaching out to white dudes. It was about reaching out to single ladies. It was about establishing a hierarchy within the Kamala Harris campaign where white dudes are going to come on, Game of Thrones style, on bended-knee, to plead for their lives in the Kingdom of Kamala. This isn’t about driving male votes out. This is about driving female votes out. The reason for that is because Kamala Harris has only one issue where she has an advantage against Donald Trump. She’s running behind him on the economy. She’s running behind him on immigration. She’s running behind him on foreign policy. She’s running behind him on pretty much everything crime-related. There’s one area where she’s consistently running ahead of Donald Trump: abortion. The entire Harris campaign is going to be about lady parts and abortion. And you need to pay homage to Kamala Harris because she is a woman.

Democratic National Committee compliance manager Joyce DeCerce admitted while on a hidden camera that he did not believe Vice President Kamala Harris — his party’s new de facto nominee — could win the 2024 presidential election. In a new video released Tuesday afternoon by James O’Keefe, DeCerce told an O’Keefe Media Group undercover journalist that Harris was “weirdly unpopular” and did not have any real “accomplishments to speak of,” even after serving three years as vice president to President Joe Biden. WATCH: BREAKING: DNC Manager: ‘I Don’t Think Kamala Harris Would Win;’ Admits to Making Empty Promises to Donors “I don’t think Kamala Harris would win this year,” reveals Joyce DeCerce (@JoyceDecerce) (he/him), Compliance Manager for the Democratic National Committee (@DNC) and Kamala… pic.twitter.com/p2jCmwbEPu — James O’Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) July 30, 2024 DeCerce, who said that his job was essentially to report how much money the DNC took in via donations and then report on how that money was spent, went on to explain that fundraising was built on listening to potential donors explain what they would like to see from the party or from the campaign, and then telling them exactly “what they want to hear.” “You just put on a performance for them, a little show, right?” he said, adding that he believed some people withheld donations when they believed the campaign was floundering. WATCH BEN SHAPIRO’S ‘SCAMALA: KAMALA HARRIS UNMASKED’ ON DAILYWIRE+ DeCerce later claimed that many of the attacks against Harris were “a bunch of racist, sexist, bulls***.” “It’s the stuff you wouldn’t say about a man,” he said. “People call her ditsy.” O’Keefe flashed back to an earlier video featuring Charlie Kraiger, Cybersecurity Policy Analyst and Foreign Affairs Executive Office of the President, who worried in January of this year that Harris was dragging the Biden reelection campaign down. On hidden camera, Kraiger said that Harris was “not popular,” adding, “but you can’t remove the first black lady to be Vice President from the god**** presidential ticket … She can’t keep black staff. They quit on her en masse.”

A wedding ring is a symbol of love that many people take very seriously. They wear that ring to show the world another person has taken their heart and to remind themselves of the one they love so dearly when they are apart. Italian Olympian Gianmarco Tamberi was proudly wearing his wedding ring on July 26 during the opening ceremony of the summer Olympics in Paris when an unfortunate accident occurred. During team Italia’s trip down the River Seine, Gianmarco’s ring slipped off his finger and into the river. View this post on Instagram A post shared by HALFSHAVE (@gianmarcotamberi) Gianmarco was heartbroken but shared a touching message with his wife about their love on his Instagram account. His original post was in Italian and translated into English. The high jumper started with an apology to his wife, writing, “I’m sorry, my love, I’m so sorry.” The high jumper explained that his ring flew off his hand and there was nothing he could do to stop it. Gianmarco believes the ring knew where it was going. “But if it was meant to happen, if I’m really going to lose this faith, I couldn’t imagine a better place. It will stay forever in the riverbed of the city of love, flown away while I tried to carry the Italian tricolor as high as possible during the opening ceremony of the most important sporting event in the world,” he wrote. Gianmarco Tamberi Wants To Make His Wife’s Dreams Come True “I think there might be a huge poetic side to yesterday’s misdeed. And if you want, we’ll throw yours into that river, too, so they’ll be together forever, and we’ll have one more excuse to, like you’ve always asked, renew our vows and get married to new. I love you, my love,” he shared. There is no word on whether her wedding ring will join his in the river during the Olympics. But, there is no doubt the couple’s love is strong, and their story has many more chapters ahead. This story’s featured image is by Kate Green/Getty Images. The post Olympic High Jumper Loses His Wedding Ring In The Seine… And His Response Will Bring You To Tears appeared first on InspireMore.

What’s the alternative?

'they have obliterated Title IX'