Islamic technology, always moving forward. The post Muslim Terrorists Unveil World’s First Suicide Baby appeared first on Frontpage Mag.

At this rate any convention floor protests will be deemed an 'insurrection'. The post Dems Plot to Rush Through Biden Nomination This Month appeared first on Frontpage Mag.

JoJo Siwa berated the crowd at a New York City Pride concert over the weekend when some of the attendees started heckling her. The 21-year-old recording artist was captured on video stopping her set to curse at the culprits. “Who the living f*** just booed me? Where the f*** did that come from? Which one of you? Which one of you?” Siwa yelled. She then took a handmade sign from fans in the audience before addressing the people booing again. “Respectfully, f*** you!” she said. Shortly after her tirade, Siwa grabbed a bouquet of flowers thrown on the stage and said, “Aww, this is sweet.” She plucked a flower from the bundle, placed it into her shorts, and made a lewd gesture by grabbing her crotch and sticking out her tongue. “F*** the booers, somebody just chucked a bra at me!” the former “Dance Moms” reality star said. The scene was captured on video and circulated on X. The person posting wrote across the video, “I cannot stop thinking about the 3 little girls in karma face paint and their mom who went up to the barricade right before she went on and what conversations might be going on right now.” The video caption said, “JoJo Siwa, they could NEVER make me like you.” For most of her career, Siwa has been a role model for young children. Recently, she has been experimenting with darker, more dramatic looks and music. In April, she turned heads at the 2024 iHeartRadio Video Music Awards for arriving in a revealing mesh outfit and black face paint. “This is my ‘KARMA,’ black beast look,” Siwa said during a red carpet interview with E! News, referring to her newly released single. “It’s got some rips in it, but you’d never know.” When asked how she’s responding to backlash for her new, more provocative look, Siwa said, “People are afraid of things they don’t know. Things can be scary for people. New things can be very, very scary.” The singer also defended herself by saying “respected” artists, including Lil Nas X and Meghan Trainor, liked her new look.

After The New York Times, always desperate to undermine Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, published an article claiming that top Israel Defense Forces generals want a cease-fire in Gaza even if it leaves Hamas in power, Netanyahu fired back. The Times wrote on Tuesday: “Israel’s top generals want to begin a cease-fire in Gaza even if it keeps Hamas in power for the time being, widening a rift between the military and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has opposed a truce that would allow Hamas to survive the war.” “The military is in full support of a hostage deal and a cease-fire,” former Israeli national security advisor Eyal Hulata claimed to the Times. “They believe that they can always go back and engage Hamas militarily in the future. They understand that a pause in Gaza makes de-escalation more likely in Lebanon. And they have less munitions, less spare parts, less energy than they did before — so they also think a pause in Gaza gives us more time to prepare in case a bigger war does break out with Hezbollah.” “Anonymous sources briefed the New York Times that Israel will be prepared to end the war before all of its objectives are achieved,” Netanyahu fired back. “I do not know who these anonymous sources are, but I am here to make it unequivocally clear: This will not happen. The war will end once Israel achieves all of its objectives, including the destruction of Hamas and the release of all of our hostages. The Government directed the IDF to achieve these war objectives and the IDF has all the means to achieve them. We will not capitulate to the winds of defeatism, neither in the New York Times nor anywhere else. We are inspired by the spirit of victory.” The IDF issued this official statement: “The IDF is determined to continue fighting to achieve the goals of the war to destroy the military and governmental capabilities of Hamas, the return of the hostages and the safe return of the residents in the north and south to their homes.” The New York Times has hated Netanyahu for years. In December 2022, The New York Times editorial board issued an opinion piece furiously condemning “ultrareligious and ultranationalist parties” that gained more power in Israel as they joined Netanyahu’s prospective government, claiming Netanyahu’s “coalition’s victory was narrow and cannot be seen as a broad mandate to make concessions to ultrareligious and ultranationalist parties that are putting the ideal of a democratic Jewish state in jeopardy.” “After burying the Holocaust for years on its back pages and demonizing Israel for decades on its front pages, the New York Times now shamefully calls for undermining Israel’s elected incoming government,” Netanyahu blasted on X. In April 2019, the Times published a monstrous Nazi-like cartoon that depicted Israeli Prime Netanyahu as a dog on a leash held by a blind President Donald Trump, who was wearing a yarmulke. That incident prompted the Times at first to issue a statement but no apology; only after the terrorist shooting at the Poway synagogue in California later did the Times issue another statement with an apology. Shame on you New York Times! This is the kind of cartoons the Nazis for their propaganda against the Jews. #Antisemitism https://t.co/0pytdIDERp — Hananya Naftali (@HananyaNaftali) April 29, 2019 The Times also ran another anti-Semitic cartoon in their weekend edition depicting a sour-faced Netanyahu in sunglasses taking a selfie while holding what looked like a stone tablet with a Star of David on it. Wait…the ⁦@nytimes⁩ featured ANOTHER Netanyahu cartoon? This one AFTER the Thursday cartoon depicting Netanyahu as a dog? Am I reading this right? Is the Times obsessed with Israel’s prime minister? pic.twitter.com/r1KsSaYWtw — Dan Senor (@dansenor) April 29, 2019 RELATED: Anti-Semitic New York Times Runs ANOTHER Cartoon Attacking Netanyahu New York Times Savages Netanyahu’s Incoming Government. Netanyahu Crushes Them.

Two teenage girls who testified in 2006 that they were victims of Jeffrey Epstein were accused of being prostitutes and told they could be charged with a crime, newly released grand jury documents revealed. The girls testified on July 19, 2006, following an effort by the Palm Beach Police Department to charge Epstein with felonies relating to his sexual exploitation of underage girls. Then State’s Attorney Barry Krischer had resisted charging Epstein for months, according to ABC News, before finally convening the grand jury. On this day of testimony, the two teenage girls were called, along with two police officers and an investigator with Krischer’s office. The entire proceeding took less than four hours, according to the newly released documents. The first witness called was Palm Beach Police Detective Joseph Recarey, who led the investigation into Epstein’s dealings with underage girls and had interviewed more than a dozen alleged victims. Recarey explained that police received a report from the stepmother of a 14-year-old girl, whom the mother said had received $300 to massage an older man on Palm Beach Island. That girl, who was 16 at the time of her testimony, was then called. She said that an older friend had recruited her to go to Epstein’s mansion the year earlier, just before her 15th birthday, and was asked to strip down to her underwear before Epstein entered the room. She testified that she then massaged Epstein and agreed to allow him to use a vibrator on her for an extra $100 in addition to the $200 she was promised for the massage. On the stand, she admitted to lying about her age and telling Epstein she was 18, which she said she was told to do by his assistant. Her parents found out about the encounter after she got into a fight at school when another girl called her a prostitute. A school official later found $300 in her purse. During the girl’s testimony, the prosecution asked her about using drugs and alcohol, getting body piercings, lying on MySpace about her age, and claiming to make $250,000. “Yeah, it’s a joke,” she testified. “Like, all my friends do that, cause it’s kind of funny and random and stupid.” A juror also asked the girl if she had “any idea deep down inside of you that…what you’re doing is wrong?” The girl responded by saying, “Yeah, I did.” The juror then suggested the girl was “well aware that what you’re doing to your own reputation,” to which the girl responded, “Yes, I do.” The juror then asked if the girl was “aware that you committed a crime?” “Now I am. I didn’t know it was a crime when I was doing it,” the girl replied. “Now, I guess it’s prostitution or something like that.” The only other alleged victim to testify said that she had gone to Epstein’s home about 10 times, starting when she was 16, and that he was “well aware of my age from the very beginning.” Later in her testimony, a prosecutor asked her if she understood that “you in effect were committing prostitution yourself?” The grand jury documents were released this week in response to a motion from the Palm Beach Post and other news outlets seeking to unseal the grand jury testimony, ABC News reported. The documents are meant to provide answers to how a grand jury could return an indictment on just one count of solicitation of a minor, yet the documents don’t reveal what charging options were presented to the grand jury.

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg‘s team said on Tuesday they will not fight a request by former President Donald Trump to challenge his guilty verdict in a hush-money trial and postpone sentencing. Prosecutors sent a letter to Judge Juan Merchan stating their position after reports that Trump’s attorneys reportedly sought permission to file a motion to challenge the recent conviction in New York after the Supreme Court ruled their client is immune from prosecution for official acts as president. “Although we believe defendant’s arguments to be without merit, we do not oppose his request for leave to file and his putative request to adjourn sentencing pending determination of his motion,” they said. Bragg’s team requested a July 24 deadline to file and serve a response with the expectation that Trump’s legal team will be allowed to file a memo in support of a motion to set aside the verdict by July 10. Merchan set sentencing for July 11, just days before Trump is expected to receive the GOP’s presidential nomination at the Republican National Convention. The judge may now choose to push back the date. A CNN source said Trump’s lawyers argued the Supreme Court ruling — delivered as part of a federal election case brought by special counsel Jack Smith — affirmed their position that Bragg should not have been permitted to offer evidence at trial regarding official acts and the guilty verdict should be set aside. In May, jurors convicted Trump on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records to allegedly cover up a tryst with adult film actress Stormy Daniels as part of a “catch-and-kill” scheme to influence the 2016 election. Trump, who denied the affair and pleaded not guilty to the charges, vowed to appeal the verdict. Three other criminal cases loom over Trump as he seeks a second term in the White House, including two led by special counsel Smith: a 2020 election case and one that focuses on classified documents. Another 2020 election case came together in Georgia and is led by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis. Trump has maintained his innocence throughout. Besides the hush-money case, it does not appear likely that any of the other cases will reach the trial stage before the November contest, in part due to the Supreme Court’s ruling on Monday that sent the federal election case back to a lower court for further review.

Newly released grand jury documents in the saga of Jeffrey Epstein reveal that Florida prosecutors were aware that Epstein had raped two teenage girls – two years before offering him a sweetheart deal that allowed him to escape serious punishment. The 2006 grand jury documents, released Monday, include the testimony of two girls who each described being paid to give Epstein massages and then engaged in sexual activity with the late millionaire and financier while they were underage. The documents also include testimony from police officers who interviewed many more girls who alleged similar acts with Epstein. But two years later, in 2008, Epstein was able to reach a deal with South Florida federal prosecutors that resulted in him pleading guilty to just one state charge of procuring a person under 18 for prostitution and solicitation of prostitution. He served 13 months in a work-release program, which allowed him to leave jail and go to his office nearly every day. He also served a year of house arrest and was required to register as a sex offender, the Associated Press reported. The deal had long been criticized as too lenient, eventually leading to the 2019 resignation of then-President Donald Trump’s labor secretary, Alex Acosta, who had signed off on it a decade earlier. Brad Edwards, who is representing many of Epstein’s alleged victims, told the AP that former Palm Beach County State Attorney Barry Krischer, who led the grand jury hearing, “took the case to the Grand Jury with an agenda — to return minimal, if any, criminal charges against Jeffrey Epstein.” “A fraction of the evidence was presented, in a misleading way, and the Office portrayed the victims as criminals,” Edwards told the outlet. “It is so sad, the number of victims Epstein was able to abuse because the State carried water for him when they had a chance to put him away.” The grand jury proceeding took less than four hours. The first witness called was Palm Beach Police Detective Joseph Recarey, who led the investigation into Epstein’s dealings with underage girls and had interviewed more than a dozen alleged victims. Recarey explained that police received a report from the stepmother of a 14-year-old girl, whom the mother said had received $300 to massage an older man on Palm Beach Island. That girl, who was 16 at the time of her testimony, was then called. She said that an older friend had recruited her to go to Epstein’s mansion the year earlier, just before her 15th birthday, and was asked to strip down to her underwear before Epstein entered the room. She testified that she then massaged Epstein and agreed to allow him to use a vibrator on her for an extra $100 in addition to the $200 she was promised for the massage. On the stand, she admitted to lying about her age and telling Epstein she was 18, which she said she was told to do by his assistant. Her parents found out about the encounter after she got into a fight at school when another girl called her a prostitute. A school official later found $300 in her purse. The girl and the other alleged victim were both painted as prostitutes during their testimony, with a juror asking the younger girl if she had “any idea deep down inside of you that…what you’re doing is wrong?” The girl responded by saying, “Yeah, I did.” The juror then suggested the girl was “well aware that what you’re doing to your own reputation,” to which the girl responded, “Yes, I do.” The juror then asked if the girl was “aware that you committed a crime?” “Now I am. I didn’t know it was a crime when I was doing it,” the girl replied. “Now, I guess it’s prostitution or something like that.” The only other alleged victim to testify said that she had gone to Epstein’s home about 10 times, starting when she was 16, and that he was “well aware of my age from the very beginning.” Later in her testimony, a prosecutor asked her if she understood that “you in effect were committing prostitution yourself?” The grand jury documents were released this week in response to a motion from the Palm Beach Post and other news outlets seeking to unseal the grand jury testimony, ABC News reported. The documents are meant to provide answers to how a grand jury could return an indictment on just one count of solicitation of a minor, yet the documents don’t reveal what charging options were presented to the grand jury.

It’s not always easy to stay safe as a solo traveler, expecially for women. That’s why it’s so helpful when more experienced travelers give advice to newbies! One social media user named Anna often shares her best tips for taking trips alone with her followers. Her content can be a useful resource for other women who might be intimidated by the idea of seeing the world on their own! In one video, Anna ranked some of the places she’s been to based on how safe she felt there by herself. She explained that, although she wasn’t alone the entire time in some of these locations, there were definitely occasions when she went exploring solo. “Rating destinations on how safe I felt as a solo female traveler,” she wrote in her caption. @annaj0an Rating destinations on how safe I felt as a solo female traveller Each experience is so different and I travelled to some of these places with groups or people but I am rating it as how safe I felt when I was alone, would I go back solo etc. I’ve rated Thailand, Vietnam, Morocco, Paris, Cambodia, India and Australia #solofemaletravel #solotravelsafety #traveltok #backpackinglife #southeastasia #australia ♬ i like the way you kiss me – Artemas First off, Anna gave Thailand a 10/10 ranking for safety. She gave the same score to Vietnam. Ranked just below were Paris and Cambodia, which each received a 9/10. Next, she gave Australia 8/10 and Morrocco 7/10. India earned the lowest score in her book at 5/10. Anna didn’t explain what made her feel safe or unsafe as a solo female traveler in these destinations. It’s also important to remember that her rankings are based on her own experiences. Some commenters disagreed with her scores, claiming that their own trips were very different. “Paris for me was a 4/10 unfortunately!” wrote one user. “Paris rated so highly even better than Australia really surprised me!” added another. “I felt much safer in Australia than Paris.” Screengrab from TikTok While Anna’s video probably shouldn’t be taken as a comprehensive travel guide, it’s great that she’s bringing up the issue of women’s safety in different locations. Obviously, everyone should be careful when they travel. However, women often do face more threats when journeying by themselves. We hope that Anna’s rankings will inspire other solo travelers to do their research on safety before heading to a new place! You can find the source of this story’s featured image here. The post “Rating Destinations On How Safe I Felt As A Solo Traveler” appeared first on InspireMore.

'either Western Civilization's identity will be preserved, or it will be lost forever'

'we do not oppose his request'