You may have it in your kitchen right now. READ MORE...

The Chicks singer Natalie Maines was the target of a death threat when the country trio played in Texas in 2003. Continue reading…

A source says he's keeping an "open mind." Continue reading…

Are you ready for Hillary Clinton to run for President (and lose) a third time/ It’s looking like you might get your wish. With Joe Biden almost certain to die, step down or be removed prior to the election, popular speculation has placed Michelle Obama and Gavin Newsom as his most likely replacements. Of course there’s also Kamala Harris to deal with…. Other contenders have emerged like (the awful) Gretchen Whitmer from Michigan, or even outsiders like The Rock or Oprah, designed to take on President Trump’s populist appeal. But one name has remained mostly out of the discussion:  Hillary Rodham Clinton. Or as she once called herself: Hill-Rod This Is Why I Call Her Hill-Rod Ready for Hillary 3.0? Let me explain why she's suddenly shooting up the ranks of possible replacements.... I'm not just picking this out of thin air. We start with this post from Buzz Patterson who is not just a random Twitter user but rather someone who literally once carried the Nuclear Football during his time serving as the Air Force Military Aide for Bill Clinton.  Patterson writes the following: I’m hearing rumors from several sources that the Democrats are planning to dump Joe Biden after the upcoming debate and replace him. It’s not going to be with Kamala Harris. It’s going to be Hillary Clinton. As some of you know, I was the Air Force Military Aide for Bill Clinton, lived in the White House, traveled everywhere they traveled, and carried the “nuclear football.” As such, I was always in close proximity to both Bill and Hill. Among the military who served in the White House and the professional White House staff, the Clinton administration was infamously known for its lack of professionalism and courtesy, though few ever spoke about it. But when it came to rudeness, it was Hillary Clinton who was the most feared person in the administration. She set the tone. From the very first day of my assignment. When I first arrived to work in the White House, my predecessor warned me. “You can get away with pissing off Bill, but if you make her mad, she’ll rip your heart out.” I heeded those words. I did make him mad a few times, but I never really pissed her off. I knew the ramifications. I learned very quickly that the administration’s day-to-day character, whether inside or outside of DC, depended solely on the presence or absence of Hillary. Her reputation preceded her. We used to say that when Hillary was gone, it was a frat party. When she was home, it was “Schindler’s List.” In my first few days on the job — and remember, I essentially lived there — I realized there were different rules for Hillary. She instructed the senior staff, including me, that she didn’t want to be forced to encounter us. We were instructed that “Whenever Mrs. Clinton is moving through the halls, be as inconspicuous as possible.” She did not want to see “staff” and be forced to “interact” with anyone — no matter their position in the building. Many a time, I’d see mature, professional adults, working in the most important building in the world, scurrying into office doorways to escape Hillary’s line of sight. I’d hear whispering, “She’s coming, she’s coming!” I could be walking down a West Wing hallway, midday, busier than hell, people doing the administration’s work, whether in the press office, medical unit, wherever. She’d walk in, and they’d scatter. She was the Nazi schoolmarm, and the rest of us were expected to hide as though we were kids in trouble. I wasn’t a kid. I was a professional officer and pilot. I said, “I’m not doing that.” There was also a period of time when she attempted to ban military uniforms in the White House. It was the reelection year of 1996, and she was trying to craft the narrative that the military was not a priority in the Clinton administration. As a military aide, carrying the football and working closely with the Secret Service, I objected to that. It simply wasn’t a matter of her political agenda; it was national security. If the balloon went up, the Secret Service would need to find me as quickly as possible. Seconds matter. Finding the aide in military uniform made complete sense. Besides, what commander-in-chief wouldn’t want to advertise his leadership and command? She finally relented because the Secret Service weighed in. If the Democrats dump Biden, and I think they’re going to have to, good ole Hill will be on the shortlist. If she runs, I will dedicate this space to raining hell on her campaign. The Clintons are corrupt beyond words. Hillary is evil, vindictive, and profane. I’m hearing rumors from several sources that the Democrats are planning to dump Joe Biden after the upcoming debate and replace him. It’s not going to be with Kamala Harris. It’s going to be Hillary Clinton.  As some of you know, I was the Air Force Military Aide for Bill… — Buzz Patterson (@BuzzPatterson) July 5, 2024 But if it were just one Twitter post from one person, I would not be writing this article. There's a lot more and I'll save the best for last. Next are Vegas betting odds, which now suddenly have Hillary Clinton added as a candidate.  While she's still coming in very low, she's now on the list: Some are asking if she replaces Biden or Harris, but I can tell you that Hillary Clinton is so arrogant and so evil she would never allow herself to be "only" the VP: So who does Hillary Clinton replace on the Democratic ticket, Biden or Harris ? pic.twitter.com/jHdpMtDBQe — phil c. (@philc411) June 20, 2024 Never forget Kim Clement telling us the enemy will do everything in its power to put a WITCH in the White House: Now that Biden is more than likely going to be replaced.. "The enemy will do everything in its power to put a witch in the white house." Hillary coming back? Yay or nay? Do you think this was about 2016 or now? pic.twitter.com/QKZpZ1HnLL — Israel (@_AlphaAnon) June 28, 2024 Which, to be fair, I suppose could apply to Harris, Whitmer or Hillary.  Or Michelle. But I want to end with the most compelling evidence of all, and a big shoutout to a reader for sending me this (thanks JQ!). Hillary has just launched a new website called "The Office of Hillary Rodham Clinton": Hillary just launched a new website today titled ‘The Office of Hilary Rodham Clinton.’Tell me she is NOT Biden’s replacement!What do you all think? This is quite a coincidence… pic.twitter.com/znnxPaTM8c — RoamingRN (@roaming_rn) June 18, 2024 It's true... I verified it myself and you can find it right here:  https://www.hillaryclinton.com Screenshot here in case it gets taken down: NOTE the 2024 copyright in the bottom footer.  The site is NEW.  It's not some old website she's had forever. But that's not the key part. A website itself doesn't mean she's running for President. Heck, I have this website at WLTReport.com and I'm not running! The key part is this page:  https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/climate/ Here's another screenshot in case this gets taken down: Folks, read it....that's a policy page. Look at all the buzzwords that tell you in no uncertain terms she is running! "As president, Hillary will:" "On day one, Hillary Clinton will..." Folks, she can't make it any clearer than that. It sure looks to me like Hillary is running! Who's ready for this moment again? Like Hillary the first time she saw balloons. pic.twitter.com/Jc9IcE0t7Z — Gregory (@gregzilla901) August 27, 2023 Hillary Clinton on Russia TV: ‘Our Goal is to Help STRENGTHEN RUSSIA https://t.co/NssBb4B13Q Pic of Hillary mistaking balloons for cash while Bill signals to a fan in the crowd: “yeah you in the blue dress, meet me backstage!” pic.twitter.com/DkBlZNz5hl — Tweaked Captions (@TweakedCaptions) June 15, 2023 Or maybe this one? Think back to 2016....Trump losing... Hillary for the win... a shoe in...Had her victory speech all ready and balloons ready to flood the stage... then this happened...Do you remember? huh? pic.twitter.com/Ac4MBGSJ3M — Bond...Eva Bond is back (@stiletoprincess) April 2, 2024 Let's do this! Welcome to the race, Hill-Rod!

The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled 4-3 to restore the use of absentee ballot drop boxes in the critical swing state ahead of the 2024 elections. The battleground state’s liberal-controlled Supreme Court overturned a prior decision to ban the use of most drop boxes. “The newly liberal Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled 4-3 to reinstate the use of drop boxes across the state. I tried to warn people. No one listened,” Scott Presler said. The newly liberal Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled 4-3 to reinstate the use of drop boxes across the state. I tried to warn people. No one listened. pic.twitter.com/ZdjZxU0QZg — ThePersistence (@ScottPresler) July 5, 2024 The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports: The 4-3 decision was a win for Democrats who argued the longstanding practice of allowing voters to file ballots into the locked, unmanned boxes made voting more accessible. That process, however, was highly criticized in 2020 by former President Donald Trump and Republicans who claimed without evidence that the boxes and absentee voting were rife with fraud. “Our decision today does not force or require that any municipal clerks use drop boxes. It merely acknowledges what (state law) has always meant: that clerks may lawfully utilize secure drop boxes in an exercise of their statutorily-conferred discretion,” Justice Ann Walsh Bradley wrote in the majority opinion. Friday’s decision means election clerks across Wisconsin can use the ballot drop boxes during the Aug. 13 partisan primaries and the Nov. 5 presidential election. Justice Rebecca Bradley, a conservative, wrote in the dissent that the liberal majority “again forsakes the rule of law in an attempt to advance its political agenda,” citing the court’s previous ruling tossing the state’s electoral maps. “July 2022, The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled that absentee drop boxes are ILLEGAL in the state. The court said drop boxes can only be placed INSIDE election offices,” MJTruthUltra wrote. “That has now changed.. and they will be placed everywhere again… —— the Wisconsin Supreme Court, just yesterday, reinstated the use of ballot drop boxes in the state,” he added. “This is a video compilation of Detroit’s satellite voting centers before the November 2020 election. Individuals and sometimes teams of people caught on camera depositing STACKS of ballots into those boxes… those Ballots were counted. No arrests,” he continued. WATCH: Here we go again… so sick of this.. The Wisconsin Supreme Court Reinstated the Decision to Allow Ballot Drop Boxes in the State • July 2022, The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled that absentee drop boxes are ILLEGAL in the state. The court said drop boxes can only be placed… pic.twitter.com/Xkk8GgJLwi — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) July 5, 2024 BREAKING: In a 4-3 decision today, Wisconsin Supreme Court reinstates the use of most ballot drop boxes across the state, overturning a decision it made less than two years ago that banned the use of most of those boxes. pic.twitter.com/yT0wJlRO0I — Real Mac Report (@RealMacReport) July 5, 2024 Per NBC News: After liberals won back the court majority in 2023, however, the Democratic group Priorities USA filed a suit explicitly seeking to overturn the 2022 ruling curtailing the use of drop boxes, as well as other rules and restrictions regarding absentee voting. (After a Wisconsin trial court narrowed the suit, the group appealed directly to the state Supreme Court, skipping over lower appeals courts.) The group had argued that the 2022 ruling was incorrectly decided due to the fact that Wisconsin law is silent on the issue of drop boxes. While the group has acknowledged that Wisconsin laws do make clear that absentee ballots must be returned by mail or in person, they raised the question in the case that it remained unclear whether voters can return absentee ballots in person to locations other than a clerk’s office. The Wisconsin Supreme Court’s four liberal justices voted to accept the case, agreeing only to resolve whether the ruling was incorrectly decided but not any other issues raised in the suit. Democrats and progressives in the state filed numerous briefs urging the court to overturn its 2022 decision, while conservative groups and the Wisconsin Republican Party filed several briefs in support of upholding the current rules regarding drop boxes. Friday’s ruling may, however, accelerate Republican efforts to embrace drop boxes in Wisconsin.

EDITOR’S NOTE: we cannot confirm or deny whether Joe Biden does indeed have Parkinson’s Disease or any form of dementia.  We are simply reporting on the growing number of reports that claim he does. Reports are swirling online that Joe Biden has been confirmed to have Parkinson’s Disease and/or forms of Dementia.  A very bad combination. Laura Loomer has led a lot of the reporting, which has been criticized by the White House but which is appearing to be confirmed by other sources as time goes on. We start with this report from Loomer from yesterday: EXCLUSIVE: When Dr. Kevin Cannard, the Parkinson’s Disease specialist met with @JoeBiden ’s physician, Dr. Kevin O’Connor on January 17th, 2024 at the @WhiteHouse , the appointment was made on January 12th (5 days before the meeting) and White House logs show the meeting was NEARLY 7 HOURS and didn’t end till MIDNIGHT! Why was a Parkinson’s specialist at the White House with Biden and his doctor till MIDNIGHT for 7 hours????? This was not mentioned this morning in the report by @nypost about the visit to the White House. 7 hours is ABNORMAL for any doctors visit. And unless it’s an emergency, doctors are not meeting with patients and their primary care doctor till Midnight. See White House log below. EXCLUSIVE: When Dr. Kevin Cannard, the Parkinson’s Disease specialist met with @JoeBiden’s physician, Dr. Kevin O’Connor on January 17th, 2024 at the @WhiteHouse, the appointment was made on January 12th (5 days before the meeting) and White House logs show the… pic.twitter.com/4ifa5Fi0Ox — Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) July 6, 2024 It should be noted that Loomer’s post is not pure speculation but is relying on White House visitor logs. Follow up here: Indeed. And they are just jealous they didn’t get it first. Now after my report came out, it’s being reported this morning that Biden’s doctor met with a Parkinson’s disease specialist at the White House. The media calls every story they didn’t break first “fake news”. They… https://t.co/X0PmbBUCgz pic.twitter.com/kUa1rzvlvn — Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) July 6, 2024 But then the NY Post got involved, posting this: President Biden’s physician met with Parkinson’s disease specialist in White House https://t.co/fOzvzpgsRr pic.twitter.com/g9lNMyA1Un — New York Post (@nypost) July 6, 2024 Here are more details from the NY Post report: A top Washington D.C. neurologist had a meeting with President Biden’s personal doctor at the White House earlier this year, visitor logs reviewed by The Post show. Dr. Kevin Cannard, a Parkinson’s disease expert at Walter Reed Medical Center, met with Dr. Kevin O’Connor, and two others at the White House residence clinic on Jan. 17, according to the records, which emerge as questions continue to swirl about the 81-year-old president’s mental health in the wake of his debate debacle last week with former President Trump. Dr. John E. Atwood, a cardiologist are Walter Reed, was also in the 5 P.M. meeting, the White House visitor logs show. The fourth person has not been identified in the logs from that day, when Biden was at the White House and hosted House and Senate leaders to press them for more Ukraine funding, according to his official schedule. Cannard is an authority on Parkinson’s who has worked at Walter Reed for nearly 20 years. Since 2012, he has served as the “neurology specialist supporting the White House Medical Unit,” according to his LinkedIn. His most recent paper was published in August 2023 in the journal Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, and focuses on the “early-stage” of the crippling disease. Since Biden’s health is O’Connor’s primary responsibility, it is highly probable the meeting was about the commander in chief, according to Rep. Ronny Jackson (R-Tx), the doctor for both Presidents Obama and Trump. “It’s highly likely they were talking about Biden,” Jackson told The Post. “He should only be [regularly] treating the president and the first family.” Bill Ackman reports that according to his sources and experts, Joe Biden has “lewy body dementia, Parkinson’s and/or Alzheimer’s”: I just spoke to one of the most respected doctors in the world. He says that it is eminently apparent that @POTUS Biden has lewy body dementia, Parkinson’s and/or Alzheimer’s and that his decline will not be linear. It will accelerate. — Bill Ackman (@BillAckman) June 30, 2024 Ackman also notes that the decline from here will not be “linear” but will accelerate quickly. More here: Neurosurgeon opinion of Biden. He undoubtedly has Parkinson’s disease, and is increasingly suffering from Parkinson’s dementia. The signs are unmistakable:-his shuffling gait-the absence of associated movements (facial expression, arm swinging)-gait instability-soft voice pic.twitter.com/U6rrE3DtTn — Caribbean Hawk (@CaribHawk) July 2, 2024 Chris Greene at AMTV actually had the report about the same time as Loomer, and posted this video explaining what he is hearing from his sources: NOTE: his videos get removed (or he takes them down) often, so this may be gone by the time you read the article. Watch here for more from OANN: “There’s so much evidence of dementia and Parkinson’s, what we saw last night was exactly that.” Dr. Sherry O’Donnell @SherryForSenate translates the telltale signs of Biden’s cognitive decline – like the blank stares and the masked face – that we all saw during the debate. pic.twitter.com/DQcGeG3sT7 — MONICA PAIGE✰OANN (@MonicaPaigeTV) June 28, 2024