Sean “Diddy” Combs has been hit with another sexual assault lawsuit after the rap mogul recently admitted he’d beaten ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura following the release of video of the attack. In a suit filed this week in New York obtained by Entertainment Weekly, former adult film star Adria English accused Combs of sexual assault and sex trafficking. In the suit, the former porn star claimed that between 2006 and 2009, Combs forced her to engage in “prostitution and sex work” with guests during his infamous “white parties” at his homes in Miami, the Hamptons, and New York, People magazine noted. The former porn star alleged that she “has lived her adult life with the memories of being trapped in a cycle of sex trafficking she never asked to be a part of and was chosen because Defendant Combs knew he could groom her,” ABC News reported. English claimed in the suit that she was forced to take narcotics and was “unable to recall details” from parties at his Miami house “due to the increased demand” that she “engage in illicit narcotics and alcohol use while employed” under Combs, EW noted. Combs’ attorney Jonathan Davis has called the allegations “baseless.” Sean “Diddy” Combs is accused of sex trafficking in a new civil lawsuit. Combs already faces allegations of sexual, physical and emotional abuse from at least eight people. He denies those claims. pic.twitter.com/EvxZCp8VmO — CBS Mornings (@CBSMornings) July 4, 2024 “No matter how many lawsuits are filed, it won’t change the fact that Mr. Combs has never sexually assaulted or sex trafficked anyone,” Davis said in a statement to EW. “We live in a world where anyone can file a lawsuit for any reason and without any proof. Fortunately, a fair and impartial judicial process exists to find the truth and Mr. Combs is confident he will prevail against these and other baseless claims in court,” his statement added. CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP English’s suit also names a second person, a woman, whom she compared to Jeffrey Epstein’s convicted co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell. The woman “was to Defendant Combs as Ghislaine Maxwell was to Jeffrey Epstein,” the lawsuit said, ABC News noted. It added that without the “woman using her inherent good will as a woman to gain the trust of another woman, coordinating and acting as an avatar for Defendant Combs, Defendant Combs would be unable to execute his corrupt sex trafficking organization.” The latest suit becomes at least the 6th suit against the rap mogul from a variety of women who have alleged sexual abuse or harassment against Combs. He has denied the allegations. In November, Combs settled a lawsuit brought by his ex-girlfriend Ventura who accused the rap mogul of sexual assault and sex trafficking. Last month, the 54-year-old rapper admitted he’d beaten Ventura after a 2016 surveillance video showing the assault in a hotel hallway was released. Combs later released a statement and said that it’s “so difficult to reflect on the darkest times in your life, but sometimes you got to do that. I was f***ed up. I mean, I hit rock bottom. And I make no excuses. My behavior on that video is inexcusable. I take full responsibility for my actions in that video.” Related: Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs Returns Key To City After Admitting To Beating Ex-Girlfriend

Michael Moore said the “elder abuse” against President Joe Biden must stop as he called for the president to step down following what he called Biden’s “utter collapse” at the presidential debate. In a lengthy article on the activist film director’s substack, Moore blasted the “out of control” Democratic Party machine, which he said wants Americans not to believe the disastrous performance they witnessed of Biden “so mentally and physically incapacitated that he cannot complete a sentence” during the CNN presidential debate. “This was not a cold. This was a human being in utter collapse,” Moore wrote. “Not just political collapse, or performance collapse, but rather a full frontal lobe meltdown where at any moment you had to wonder… was it possible that the sweet and fragile existence we call ‘life’ was about to short-circuit, or worse, lose power (to Trump)?” Dem leaders want us to believe we didn’t see what we saw at the debate. But my eyes don’t lie. Neither do yours. This isn’t about whether Biden’s fit to serve 4 more yrs—but rather should he serve 4 more days? What happened on that stage was heartbreaking. https://t.co/JTYETNCaVi — Michael Moore (@MMFlint) July 5, 2024 “This is not about whether he’s fit to serve another four years — this is about whether he should serve another four days in the toughest job in the world,” he added. “That’s the question we should be asking.” Moore then apologized for what he was saying and said if he has to be the only one to protect Biden from the “cruelest form of elder abuse I’ve ever been forced to watch,” then that’s exactly what he will do. CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP “Biden was not well. Biden did not possess the faculties he needed. Something was wrong,” the filmmaker wrote. “Did nobody see this in the days leading up to the collapse? Did not a single person raise their voice to ask, ‘Maybe we shouldn’t do this to him?’ But they did do it to him. And the repercussions that we, the world, and the generations after us will have to suffer through are not even part of the discussion this week. It’s all about making sure he stays in the race — and nothing about the risk to his life he is facing as they push him to soldier onward.” Moore said that the Founding Fathers knew we would have leaders who wouldn’t be able to carry out their terms and suggested the answer to Biden is Vice President Kamala Harris. “For the good of the country,” he said the Democrats should “leave Mr. Biden alone. Let him rest. Let him go home.” The leftist filmaker wrote that Biden resigns and then Harris gets “sworn in as President. By federal campaign rules, she, and only she, inherits all the campaign funds in the Biden-Harris war chest. Biden will urge all his Biden-Harris convention delegates to support her.” He concluded his long article by saying with Harris now as “the Incumbent President,” “there will be no real convention fight, and nearly every American who had planned to vote for Biden will vote for Harris (as recent polling has revealed).” Related: Michael Moore Warns Biden’s Chances Of Being Re-Elected Are Not ‘So Great’

In a controversial move, the federal government, through the USDA, is proposing a new rule that would mandate RFID (radio-frequency identification) tagging of all cattle and bison crossing state lines. The aim of this rule is to enhance the tracking of livestock movements, ostensibly to improve food safety and manage disease outbreaks. However, the proposal has sparked significant concern among ranchers and privacy advocates who view it as another instance of government overreach. The RFID tags, unlike traditional ear tags or tattoos, can be scanned from a distance, allowing for real-time tracking of livestock movements. Proponents argue that this technology will streamline the tracking process, making it easier to trace the origins of foodborne illnesses and respond more swiftly to outbreaks. This system is seen as crucial for ensuring the safety of the national food supply chain, especially in the face of increasing concerns about diseases like bovine tuberculosis and foot-and-mouth disease. The Government Wants To Track Your SteakA proposed USDA rule would require RFID tagging of all cattle and bison that move across state lines. https://t.co/Iy22gMqGWq — MCH (@MCH_Law) June 22, 2024 However, critics are not convinced. They argue that the costs associated with implementing RFID tagging are prohibitively high for small and medium-sized ranchers, potentially driving many out of business. Additionally, there are privacy concerns about the government having the capability to track the movement of livestock in real-time, which some see as a slippery slope towards increased surveillance and control over the agricultural sector. Mandatory RFID chips to track all cattle in the USA….for what purpose? pic.twitter.com/PdAypYvxyc — GreatLakesLady (@GreatlakesladyM) March 8, 2024 One of the most vocal opponents of the RFID mandate is the R-CALF USA, a cattlemen’s association that represents independent cattle producers. They argue that the USDA's proposal favors large agribusinesses that can more easily absorb the costs associated with the new technology. Bill Bullard, the CEO of R-CALF USA, stated, "This is nothing more than a means for the government to further control and monitor our industry under the guise of food safety." There is also a broader context of growing government surveillance that adds fuel to the opposition's fire. The RFID proposal is seen by many as part of a larger trend of increased government intervention and monitoring, which includes everything from digital currencies to health regulations. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has previously criticized such measures, likening them to "a wolf in sheep's clothing"​​. This sentiment is echoed by many in the agricultural community who fear that this could set a precedent for further invasive policies. The USDA counters that the RFID tags will bring the U.S. in line with international standards, which could open up new markets for American beef and bison products. They also assert that the technology will lead to a more efficient and resilient food system, capable of quickly addressing any potential threats. While the debate rages on, it is clear that the proposed RFID tagging rule is emblematic of a larger conflict between government regulatory efforts and the rights of individual farmers and ranchers. The outcome of this proposal will likely have significant implications not only for the livestock industry but also for the broader discussions about privacy, surveillance, and government overreach. The post Government Wants to Track Your Steak with RFID Tags appeared first on The Conservative Brief.

The crash left one dead and ten hospitalized.

When Led Zeppelin broke up after John Bonham’s death, Jimmy Page faced the reality that any new vocalist he would ever work with would forever be compared to the legendary Robert Plant. There was simply no way around it. Led Zeppelin’s sound was so unique and powerfully defined by four individuals that losing any member would prove too difficult for the band to survive. Robert Plant understood that more than Page and Jones, or at least that is what we have been led to believe. In the post-Led Zeppelin era, Jimmy Page released music sparingly. The most consistent project that The post Why “Wasting My Time” Was Jimmy Page’s Best Post Led Zeppelin Song appeared first on ClassicRockHistory.com.

Fisker Fire Sale

A Tennessee judge has ruled that writings from the Covenant school killer will not be released "at this time."There has been an ongoing legal battle to secure the release of the writings that the killer left behind. After the tragedy last year, Nashville police vowed to release the documents, but that day never came. The FBI pressured against the release of the documents, and the families of the victims oppose the documents making their way into public hands.'Compliance with both the TPRA and federal copyright law cannot be accomplished, therefore state law must cede to federal law.'But the other side argues there is a compelling public and constitutional interest requiring the documents be made public.Just minutes before the clock struck midnight on July 4 — at 11:58 p.m., according to court documents — Davidson County Chancellor I'Ashea Myles (D) issued a ruling that blocks the release of the documents — at least for now."Tennessee courts have determined that unfettered access to every record at any time does not serve to uphold the system of justice that we all depend upon to ensure that the criminal legal system and investigations remain fair and impartial for every involved person," Myles wrote in her ruling.As legal justification for her ruling, Myles cited the Constitution's Supremacy Clause."Based upon Supremacy Clause and conflict preemption, the federal Copyright Act serves as a valid exemption to the Tennessee Public Records Act and thus preempts the disclosure of any original work of authorship in any form created by the assailant," she explained."Compliance with both the TPRA and federal copyright law cannot be accomplished, therefore state law must cede to federal law," she added.Legally, the victims possess ownership over the documents after the killer's family transferred legal ownership of them last year.Even documents not protected by copyright law, Myles ruled, do not have to be released until the "investigation and any collateral criminal proceedings are complete." In a statement after the ruling, the city of Nashville said officials will release documents upon the conclusion of the investigation — with the exception of the killer's writings. The investigation, the statement added, "is in its final stages."The victims' families praised the ruling, which will likely be appealed.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

After Joe Biden’s disastrous first debate, Democrats are scrambling to figure out who will lead them into the 2024 election. Vice President Kamala Harris is a contender, but as Sara Gonzales highlights, she’s not a good one. To put it simply, Gonzales calls her “one of the worst DEI hires.” “This whole thing imploding with Joe Biden, an old white man, and Kamala Harris, who everyone knows cannot handle the job, but they’re afraid to be like, ‘Well, how do you jump over Kamala? Because you guys sold her as like the first black, the first woman, the first, what, Indonesian?’” Gonzales says. Understandably, this is causing a rift between Democrats. “Now they are in this position where there’s a lot of infighting, because they’ve just sold all these DEI measures as, like, the most important qualifications for the job,” Gonzales says, noting that Stephen A. Smith recently had a delegate on his show who illustrates her point perfectly. “There’s a long list of Democrats: Kamala Harris, Gavin Newsom, Gretchen Whitmer. The list goes on, and on, and on,” the delegate, who is a black woman, tells Stephen. “If you pick a white man over Kamala Harris, black women, I can tell you this, we gonna walk away, we gonna blow the party up.'” “Democrats, you’ve done it to yourselves,” Gonzales comments. “You radicalize all of these people on all of these initiatives, and then they’re mad that you’re not going far enough against Israel, and they’re not going to vote for you. You radicalize these people on climate change, and they’re mad that you still use, you know, private jets, and they’re not going to vote for you,” she continues. While it’s a complete mess, Gonzales doesn’t mind. “‘If you don’t choose her, we’re going to blow the party up.’ I love this. I can’t wait to watch that happen,” she says.Want more from Sara Gonzales?To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred take to news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

DISASTER: An Hour-Late Biden Burns Wisconsin Down With His Senility, Gets Trolled by His Own Supporters

CNN's Dr. Sanjay Gupta Calls on Biden to Undergo 'Detailed Cognitive Testing,' Release Results to Public